Localized fine-tuning and clinical evaluation of deep-learning based auto-segmentation (DLAS) model for clinical target volume (CTV) and organs-at-risk (OAR) in rectal cancer radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Various deep learning auto-segmentation (DLAS) models have been proposed, some of which have been commercialized. However, the issue of performance degradation is notable when pretrained models are deployed in the clinic. This study aims to enhance precision of a popular commercial DLAS product in rectal cancer radiotherapy by localized fine-tuning, addressing challenges in practicality and generalizability in real-world clinical settings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 120 Stage II/III mid-low rectal cancer patients were retrospectively enrolled and divided into three datasets: training (n = 60), external validation (ExVal, n = 30), and generalizability evaluation (GenEva, n = 30) datasets respectively. The patients in the training and ExVal dataset were acquired on the same CT simulator, while those in GenEva were on a different CT simulator. The commercial DLAS software was first localized fine-tuned (LFT) for clinical target volume (CTV) and organs-at-risk (OAR) using the training data, and then validated on ExVal and GenEva respectively. Performance evaluation involved comparing the LFT model with the vendor-provided pretrained model (VPM) against ground truth contours, using metrics like Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), 95th Hausdorff distance (95HD), sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: LFT significantly improved CTV delineation accuracy (p < 0.05) with LFT outperforming VPM in target volume, DSC, 95HD and specificity. Both models exhibited adequate accuracy for bladder and femoral heads, and LFT demonstrated significant enhancement in segmenting the more complex small intestine. We did not identify performance degradation when LFT and VPM models were applied in the GenEva dataset. CONCLUSIONS: The necessity and potential benefits of LFT DLAS towards institution-specific model adaption is underscored. The commercial DLAS software exhibits superior accuracy once localized fine-tuned, and is highly robust to imaging equipment changes.

[Advances in research on organ-at-risk protection in pelvic tumor external beam radiotherapy].

The simultaneous objectives of destroying tumor cells while protecting normal pelvic organs present a dual clinical and technical challenge within the realm of pelvic tumor radiotherapy. This article reviews the latest literatures, focusing on technological innovations in key aspects of radiotherapy such as positioning, planning, and delivery. These include positioning fixation techniques, organ-at-risk avoidance irradiation, non-coplanar irradiation techniques, as well as organ displacement protection and image-guided adaptive techniques. It summarizes and discusses the research progress made in the protection of critical organs during pelvic tumor radiotherapy. The paper emphasizes technological advancements in the protection of critical organs throughout the processes of radiotherapy positioning, planning, and implementation, aiming to provide references for further research on the protection of critical organs in the external irradiation treatment of pelvic tumors.

Enhancing the Contouring Efficiency for Head and Neck Cancer Radiotherapy Using Atlas-based Auto-segmentation and Scripting.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy can deliver a highly conformal dose to a target while minimizing the dose to the organs at risk (OARs). Delineating the contours of OARs is time-consuming, and various automatic contouring software programs have been employed to reduce the delineation time. However, some software operations are manual, and further reduction in time is possible. This study aimed to automate running atlas-based auto-segmentation (ABAS) and software operations using a scripting function, thereby reducing work time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dice coefficient and Hausdorff distance were used to determine geometric accuracy. The manual delineation, automatic delineation, and modification times were measured. While modifying the contours, the degree of subjective correction was rated on a four-point scale. RESULTS: The model exhibited generally good geometric accuracy. However, some OARs, such as the chiasm, optic nerve, retina, lens, and brain require improvement. The average contour delineation time was reduced from 57 to 29 min (p<0.05). The subjective revision degree results indicated that all OARs required minor modifications; only the submandibular gland, thyroid, and esophagus were rated as modified from scratch. CONCLUSION: The ABAS model and scripted automation in head and neck cancer reduced the work time and software operations. The time can be further reduced by improving contour accuracy.

Multiple organ segmentation framework for brain metastasis radiotherapy.

Radiotherapy is a preferred treatment for brain metastases, which kills cancer cells via high doses of radiation meanwhile hardly avoiding damage to surrounding healthy cells. Therefore, the delineation of organs-at-risk (OARs) is vital in treatment planning to minimize radiation-induced toxicity. However, the following aspects make OAR delineation a challenging task: extremely imbalanced organ sizes, ambiguous boundaries, and complex anatomical structures. To alleviate these challenges, we imitate how specialized clinicians delineate OARs and present a novel cascaded multi-OAR segmentation framework, called OAR-SegNet. OAR-SegNet comprises two distinct levels of segmentation networks: an Anatomical-Prior-Guided network (APG-Net) and a Point-Cloud-Guided network (PCG-Net). Specifically, APG-Net handles segmentation for all organs, where multi-view segmentation modules and a deep prior loss are designed under the guidance of prior knowledge. After APG-Net, PCG-Net refines small organs through the mini-segmentation and the point-cloud alignment heads. The mini-segmentation head is further equipped with the deep prior feature. Extensive experiments were conducted to demonstrate the superior performance of the proposed method compared to other state-of-the-art medical segmentation methods.

The Effect of Dose Enhancement in Tumor With Silver Nanoparticles on Surrounding Healthy Tissues: A Monte Carlo Study.

Objectives: Cancer-related death rates account for approximately one-third of all deaths, and this rate is increasing remarkably every year. In this study, we examined the dose enhancement factor (DEF) in the tumor and surrounding tissues by adding different concentrations of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) to the brain tumor using the Monte Carlo (MC) technique. Methods: This study used MCNP6.2 simulation software. A Planning Target Volume (PTV) of 1 × 1 × 1 cm3 was placed in the center of a cubic cranial model with dimensions of 5 × 5 × 5 cm3. Five different simulations were initially generated using the simple method. These simulations included pure PTV and PTV consisting of 4 different silver concentrations (5, 10, 20, and 30 mg/g). Additionally, a model was created using the nanolattice method, considering the size, position, and distribution of the AgNPs. Irradiation was performed using a source with a 6 MV linac photon spectrum. Measurements were performed using the *f8 tally, and DEF values were calculated. Results: In the simulation study using the simple method, the DEF value of PTV increased linearly with concentration, whereas the DEF values were lower than the simulation results with the nanolattice model (1.9 vs 1.4 for 30 mg/g NP concentration). Performing the simple method, we observed no remarkable dose increase in lateral OARs surrounding PTV. While a remarkable dose decrease was observed in distal OARs, a dose increase in the proximal OAR was observed, which was consistent with that of PTV. However, according to the results obtained by performing the nanolattice method, the dose increase was observed in both the proximal OAR and the distal OAR and was similar to that of PTV. Conclusion: While enhancing the dose in the tumor by adding NPs into the tumor, it is essential to consider whether it also increases the OAR dose. In addition, simulation studies on NPs showed that the dose increase varied significantly with particle size, position, and distribution. Hence, these factors should be considered carefully.

Analysis of Individualized Silicone Rubber Bolus Using Fan Beam Computed Tomography in Postmastectomy Radiotherapy: A Dosimetric Evaluation and Skin Acute Radiation Dermatitis Survey.

Objective: To investigate the dosimetric effects of using individualized silicone rubber (SR) bolus on the target area and organs at risk (OARs) during postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT), as well as evaluate skin acute radiation dermatitis (ARD). Methods: A retrospective study was performed on 30 patients with breast cancer. Each patient was prepared with an individualized SR bolus of 3 mm thickness. Fan-beam computed tomography (FBCT) was performed at the first and second fractions, and then once a week for a total of 5 times. Dosimetric metrics such as homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), skin dose (SD), and OARs including the heart, lungs, and spinal cord were compared between the original plan and the FBCTs. The acute side effects were recorded. Results: In targets' dosimetric metrics, there were no significant differences in Dmean and V105% between planning computed tomography (CT) and actual treatments (P > .05), while the differences in D95%, V95%, HI, and CI were statistically significant (P < .05). In OARs, there were no significant differences between the Dmean, V5, and V20 of the affected lung, V5 of the heart and Dmax of the spinal cord (P > .05) except the V30 of affected lung, which was slightly lower than the planning CT (P < .05). In SD, both Dmax and Dmean in actual treatments were increased than plan A, and the difference was statistically significant (P < .05), while the skin-V20 and skin-V30 has no difference. Among the 30 patients, only one patient had no skin ARD, and 5 patients developed ARD of grade 2, while the remaining 24 patients were grade 1. Conclusion: The OR bolus showed good anastomoses and high interfraction reproducibility with the chest wall, and did not cause deformation during irradiation. It ensured accurate dose delivery of the target and OARs during the treatment, which may increase SD by over 101%. In this study, no cases of grade 3 skin ARD were observed. However, the potential of using OR bolus to reduce grade 1 and 2 skin ARD warrants further investigation with a larger sample size.

Use of rectal balloon spacer in patients with localized prostate cancer receiving external beam radiotherapy.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of the balloon spacer when used to reduce the radiation dose delivered to the rectum in prostate cancer patients undergoing external beam radiotherapy. Method: A single center retrospective analysis including 75 PC patients with localized T1-T3a disease who received balloon spacer followed by EBRT. Pre- and post-implantation computed tomography (CT) scans were utilized for treatment planning for standard EBRT (78-81 Gy in 1.8-2 Gy fractions). Rectal dosimetry was assessed using DVHs, and toxicities were graded with CTCAE v.4. Results: A median (IQR) prostate-rectum separation resulted in 1.6 cm (1.4-2.0) post balloon spacer implantation. Overall, 90.6 % (68/75) of patients had a clinically significant 25 % relative reduction in the rectal with a median relative reduction of 91.8 % (71.2-98.6 %) at rV70. Three (4.0 %) patients reported mild procedural adverse events, anal discomfort and dysuria. Within 90 days post-implantation, five patients (6.67 %) and 1 patient (1.33 %) reported grade 1 and grade 2 rectal toxicities (anal pain, constipation, diarrhea and hemorrhoids). Genitourinary (GU) grade 1 toxicity was reported in 37 patients (49.33 %), with only one patient (1.33 %) experiencing grade 2 GU toxicity. No grade ≥ 3 toxicity was reported. Conclusion: Balloon spacer implantation effectively increased prostate-rectum separation and associated with dosimetric gains EBRT for PC stage T1-T3a. Further controlled studies are required to ascertain whether this spacer allows for radiotherapy dose escalation and minimizes gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity.

Mean Oral Cavity Organ-at-Risk Dose Predicts Opioid Use and Hospitalization during Radiotherapy for Patients with Head and Neck Tumors.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 75% of all head and neck cancer patients are treated with radiotherapy (RT). RT to the oral cavity results in acute and late adverse events which can be severe and detrimental to a patient's quality of life and function. The purpose of this study was to explore associations between RT dose to a defined oral cavity organ-at-risk (OAR) avoidance structure, provider- and patient-reported outcomes (PROs), opioid use, and hospitalization. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively obtained outcomes using multivariable modeling. The study included 196 patients treated with RT involving the oral cavity for a head and neck tumor. A defined oral cavity OAR avoidance structure was used in all patients for RT treatment planning. Validated PROs were collected prospectively. Opioid use and hospitalization were abstracted electronically from medical records. RESULTS: Multivariable modeling revealed the mean dose to the oral cavity OAR was significantly associated with opioid use (p = 0.0082) and hospitalization (p = 0.0356) during and within 30 days of completing RT. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study may be valuable in RT treatment planning for patients with tumors of the head and neck region to reduce the need for opioid use and hospitalization during treatment.

And Yet It Moves: Clinical Outcomes and Motion Management in Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) of Centrally Located Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): Shedding Light on the Internal Organ at Risk Volume (IRV) Concept.

The internal organ at risk volume (IRV) concept might improve toxicity profiles in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We studied (1) clinical aspects in central vs. peripheral tumors, (2) the IRV concept in central tumors, (3) organ motion, and (4) associated normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs). We analyzed patients who received SBRT for NSCLC (clinical aspects, n = 78; motion management, n = 35). We found lower biologically effective doses, larger planning target volume sizes, higher lung doses, and worse locoregional control for central vs. peripheral tumors. Organ motion was greater in males and tall patients (bronchial tree), whereas volume changes were lower in patients with a high body mass index (BMI) (esophagus). Applying the IRV concept (retrospectively, without new optimization), we found an absolute increase of >10% in NTCPs for the bronchial tree in three patients. This study emphasizes the need to optimize methods to balance dose escalation with toxicities in central tumors. There is evidence that organ motion/volume changes could be more pronounced in males and tall patients, and less pronounced in patients with higher BMI. Since recent studies have made efforts to further subclassify central tumors to refine treatment, the IRV concept should be considered for optimal risk assessment.

Dosimetric Comparision of Coplanar versus Noncoplanar Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Treatment of Bilateral Breast Cancers.

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to compare the dosimetric parameters of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment plans using coplanar and noncoplanar beams in patients with bilateral breast cancer/s (BBCs) in terms of organ at risk sparing and target volume coverage. The hypothesis was to test whether VMAT with noncoplanar beams can result in lesser dose delivery to critical organs such as heart and lung, which will result in lesser overall toxicity. Materials and Methods: Data of nine BBC cases treated at our hospital were retrieved. Computed tomography simulation data of these cases was used to generate noncoplanar VMAT plans and the parameters were compared with standard VMAT coplanar plans. Contouring was done using radiation therapy oncology group guidelines. Forty-five Gray in 25 fractions was planned followed by 10 Gy in five fractions boost in breast conservation cases. Results: No significant difference in planning target volume (PTV) coverage was found for the right breast/chestwall (P = 0.940), left breast/chestwall (P = 0.872), and in the total PTV (P = 0.929). Noncoplanar beams resulted in better cardiac sparing in terms of Dmean heart. The difference in mean dose was >1 Gy (8.80 ± 0.28 - 7.28 ± 0.33, P < 0.001). The Dmean, V20 and V30 values for total lung slightly favor noncoplanar beams, although there was no statistically significant difference. The average monitor units (MUs) were similar for coplanar plans (1515 MU) and noncoplanar plans (1455 MU), but the overall treatment time was higher in noncoplanar plans due to more complex setup and beam arrangement. For noncoplanar VMAT plans, the mean conformity index was slightly better although the homogeneity indices were similar. Conclusion: VMAT plans with noncoplanar beam arrangements had significant dosimetric advantages in terms of sparing of critical organs, that is Dmean of heart doses with almost equivalent lung doses and equally good target coverage. Larger studies with clinical implications need to be considered to validate this data.

Multicenter, dual fractionation scheme, single core lab comparison of rectal volume dose reduction following injection of two biodegradable perirectal spacers.

PURPOSE: A multicenter, double-arm, central core lab, retrospective study was performed to compare the rectal dosimetry of patients implanted with two injectable, biodegradable perirectal spacers, in conventional fractionation (CF), as well as ultrahypofractionation (UH) treatment plans. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifty-nine patients were enrolled into the study in five centers: two centers in Europe, which implanted a biodegradable balloon spacer in a total of 24 subjects and three centers in the US, which implanted the SpaceOAR in 35 subjects. Anonymized CTs (pre and post-implantation) were reviewed by the central core lab. For VMAT CF plans rectal V50, V60, V70, and V80 were calculated. For UH plans, a corresponding rectal V22.6, V27.1, V31.37, and V36.25 were established representing 62.5%, 75%, 87.5%, and 100% of the 36.25 Gy prescribed dose. RESULTS: For CF VMAT, a comparison between the balloon spacer and the SpaceOAR revealed a significant difference of 33.4% decrease in mean rectal V50 (71.9% vs. 38.5%, p < 0.001), 27.7% in mean rectal V60 (79.6% vs. 51.9%, p < 0.001), 17.1% difference in mean rectal V70 (84.1% vs. 67.0%, p = 0.001), and a significant difference of 3.0% (p = 0.019) in mean rectal V80 (87.2% vs. 84.2%). With UH analysis, the mean rectal dose reduction for the balloon spacer compared to the SpaceOAR was 79.2% and 53.3% for V27.1 (p < 0.001), 84.1% and 68.1% for V31.71 (p = 0.001), and 89.7% and 84.8% for V36.25 (p = 0.012), respectively. CONCLUSION: Rectal dosimetry is more favorable for treatment with the balloon spacer compared with SpaceOAR. Further research, particularly in the context of a prospective randomized clinical trial design, is needed to assess the acute and late toxicity experience as well as physician satisfaction with achieving symmetrical implantation, and ease of use in light of increasing clinical use.

An investigation into the risk of population bias in deep learning autocontouring.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To date, data used in the development of Deep Learning-based automatic contouring (DLC) algorithms have been largely sourced from single geographic populations. This study aimed to evaluate the risk of population-based bias by determining whether the performance of an autocontouring system is impacted by geographic population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 80 Head Neck CT deidentified scans were collected from four clinics in Europe (n = 2) and Asia (n = 2). A single observer manually delineated 16 organs-at-risk in each. Subsequently, the data was contoured using a DLC solution, and trained using single institution (European) data. Autocontours were compared to manual delineations using quantitative measures. A Kruskal-Wallis test was used to test for any difference between populations. Clinical acceptability of automatic and manual contours to observers from each participating institution was assessed using a blinded subjective evaluation. RESULTS: Seven organs showed a significant difference in volume between groups. Four organs showed statistical differences in quantitative similarity measures. The qualitative test showed greater variation in acceptance of contouring between observers than between data from different origins, with greater acceptance by the South Korean observers. CONCLUSION: Much of the statistical difference in quantitative performance could be explained by the difference in organ volume impacting the contour similarity measures and the small sample size. However, the qualitative assessment suggests that observer perception bias has a greater impact on the apparent clinical acceptability than quantitatively observed differences. This investigation of potential geographic bias should extend to more patients, populations, and anatomical regions in the future.

Evaluation of dosimetric and volumetric changes in target volumes and organs at risk during adaptive radiotherapy in head and neck cancer: A prospective study.

BACKGROUND: During radiation therapy for head and neck malignancies, most patients experience significant anatomical alterations due to loss of weight, changes in tumor volumes, and immobilization issues. Adaptive radiotherapy adapts to the patient's actual anatomy through repetitive imaging and replanning. In the present study, dosimetric and volumetric changes in target volumes and organs at risk during adaptive radiotherapy in head and neck cancer was evaluated. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-four locally advanced Head and neck carcinoma patients with histologically proven Squamous Cell Carcinoma for curative treatment were included. Rescan was done at the end of 20 fractions of treatment. All quantitative data were analyzed with paired t-Test and Wilcoxon Signed Rank (Z) test. RESULTS: Most patients had oropharyngeal carcinoma (52.9%). There were significant volumetric changes in all the parameters - GTV-primary (10.95, p < 0.001), GTV- nodal (5.81, p = 0.001), PTV High Risk (26.1, p < 0.001), PTV - Intermediate Risk (46.9, p = 0.006), PTV - Low Risk (43.9, p = 0.003), lateral neck diameter (0.9, p < 0.001), right parotid volumes (6.36, p < 0.001) and left parotid volumes (4.93, p < 0.001). Dosimetric changes in the organs at risk were non-significant. CONCLUSION: Adaptive replanning has been seen to be labour intensive. However, the changes in the volumes of both target and the OARs credit a mid-treatment replanning to be done. Long term follow-up is required to assess locoregional control after adaptive radiotherapy in head and neck cancer.

Dosimetric benefits of adaptive radiation therapy for patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Daily adaptive radiation therapy (ART) of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) lowers organs at risk exposure while maintaining the planning target volume (PTV) coverage. Thus, ART allows an isotoxic approach with increased doses to the PTV that could improve local tumor control. Herein we evaluate daily online ART strategies regarding their impact on relevant dose-volume metrics. METHODS: Daily cone-beam CTs (1 × n = 28, 1 × n = 29, 11 × n = 30) of 13 stage III NSCLC patients were converted into synthetic CTs (sCTs). Treatment plans (TPs) were created retrospectively on the first-fraction sCTs (sCT1) and subsequently transferred unaltered to the sCTs of the remaining fractions of each patient (sCT2-n) (IGRT scenario). Two additional TPs were generated on sCT2-n: one minimizing the lung-dose while preserving the D95%(PTV) (isoeffective scenario), the other escalating the D95%(PTV) with a constant V20Gy(lungipsilateral) (isotoxic scenario). RESULTS: Compared to the original TPs predicted dose, the median D95%(PTV) in the IGRT scenario decreased by 1.6 Gy ± 4.2 Gy while the V20Gy(lungipsilateral) increased in median by 1.1% ± 4.4%. The isoeffective scenario preserved the PTV coverage and reduced the median V20Gy(lungipsilateral) by 3.1% ± 3.6%. Furthermore, the median V5%(heart) decreased by 2.9% ± 6.4%. With an isotoxic prescription, a median dose-escalation to the gross target volume of 10.0 Gy ± 8.1 Gy without increasing the V20Gy(lungipsilateral) and V5%(heart) was feasible. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that even without reducing safety margins, ART can reduce lung-doses, while still reaching adequate target coverage or escalate target doses without increasing ipsilateral lung exposure. Clinical benefits by means of toxicity and local control of both strategies should be evaluated in prospective clinical trials.

Lattice Radiation Therapy in clinical practice: A systematic review.

Purpose: Lattice radiation therapy (LRT) is an innovative type of spatially fractionated radiation therapy. It aims to increase large tumors control probability by administering ablative doses without an increased toxicity. Considering the rising number of positive clinical experiences, the objective of this work is to evaluate LRT safety and efficacy. Method: Reports about LRT clinical experience were identified with a systematic review conducted on four different databases (namely, Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library) through the August 2022. Only LRT clinical reports published in English and with the access to the full manuscript text were considered as eligible. The 2020 update version PRISMA statement was followed. Results: Data extraction was performed from 12 eligible records encompassing 7 case reports, 1 case series, and 4 clinical studies. 81 patients (84 lesions) with a large lesion ranging from 63.2 cc to 3713.5 cc were subjected to exclusive, hybrid, and metabolism guided LRT. Excluding two very severe toxicity with a questionable relation with LRT, available clinical experience seem to confirm LRT safety. When a complete response was not achieved 3-6 months after LRT, a median lesion reduction approximately ≥50 % was registered. Conclusion: This systematic review appear to suggest LRT safety, especially for exclusive LRT. The very low level of evidence and the studies heterogeneity preclude drawing definitive conclusions on LRT efficacy, even though an interesting trend in terms of lesions reduction has been described.

Analytical dosimetric study of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: The study aimed to compare the dosimetric results and treatment delivery efficiency among four techniques to explore the preferred technique in prostate treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 7 IMRT, 9 IMRT, 1 ARC, and 2 ARC plans were created for 30 prostate cancer patients using the Eclipse™ treatment planning system (Varian Medical Systems). All the plans were designed to deliver 80.0 Gy in 40 fractions to the prostate planning target volume (PTV). Target coverage, organs at risk (OARs), number of monitor units, homogeneity, and conformity were compared across the four techniques to assess the quality of the plans. RESULTS: The study revealed better Planning Target Volume (PTV) dose coverage in the VMAT-2A than in the other plans. At the same time, VMAT-2A plans were found to be significantly lower in terms of Bladder and rectum doses than other techniques. In addition, VMAT has the advantage of considerably reducing the number of monitor units and treatment time. CONCLUSION: For prostate cancer, VMAT may offer a favorable dose gradient profile, conformity, and MU and treatment time compared to IMRT.

Considerations regarding carotid artery dose in radiotherapy of the cervical spine.

Radiation to the carotid arteries, e.g. in the context of head and neck cancer treatment, is one of several risk factors for artery stenosis. In principle, this fact may also have implications for stereotactic cervical spine radiotherapy, because long-term survival can be achieved in patients with oligometastatic disease and favorable prognostic features. Here, we suggest that radiation dose distributions with reduced dose to the carotid artery are achievable when planning stereotactic cervical spine radiotherapy. Patients with high likelihood of long-term survival may benefit from such vessel-sparing approaches.

Effect of couch rotation angle on non-coplanar static intensity-modulated radiotherapy plan for gastric cancer / 中国辐射卫生

Objective To investigate the effect of couch rotation angle on non-coplanar static intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plan for gastric cancer and to provide a reference for clinical planning. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who recently underwent postoperative IMRT for gastric cancer. Twenty patients who received radiotherapy in the centre of Radiation Oncology of Huanggang Central Hospital from August 2022 to January 2023 were selected. That were selected to receive a seven-field coplanar static IMRT plan based on a couch rotation angle of 0° as the control group. Then, based on the coplanar IMRT plan, only the couch rotation angle of gantry angles 30° and 330° was changed to 10°, 20°, 30°, 40°, 50°, 60°, 70°, 80°, and 90°, respectively, and nine different non-coplanar plans were established. The homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI) of the target volume, and monitor unit (MU), as well as Dmean, V20, and V30 of the left and right kidneys, Dmax, Dmean, V10, V20, and V30 of the spinal cord, and Dmax, Dmean, V10, V20, V30, and V40 of the small intestine and liver were compared among the 10 plans. The MU and the dosimetric parameters of the target volumes and When the couch rotation angle was 60°, the minimum HI and maximum CI of the target volume were 0.0714±0.0089 and 0.9271±0.0108, respectively, and the minimum MU was 438±26, with the best homogeneity and conformity in the target volume and the shortest machine treatment time (P＜0.05). When the couch rotation angle was 10°, the Dmax of the small intestine was lowest, being (4620.73±99.27) cGy. When the couch rotation angle was 60°, the Dmean of the left and right kidneys was lowest, being (1246.30±130.35) cGy and (1001.52±103.33) cGy, respectively; the V20 of the left and right kidneys was lowest, being 22.87±6.29 and 19.69±1.84, respectively; the V10 and V30 of the spinal cord were lowest, being 40.08±4.92 and 1.68±0.34, respectively (P＜0.05). Conclusion The couch rotation angle has some influence on the postoperative treatment planning for patients with gastric cancer. In the design of non-coplanar plan for gastric cancer, the couch rotation angle of 60° contributes to establishing a better radiotherapy plan.

Autodelineation of organ at risk in head and neck cancer radiotherapy using artificial intelligence.

Aim: The aim of this study is to check the practical feasibility of artificial intelligence for day-to-day operations and how it generalizes when the data have considerable interobserver variability. Background: Automated delineation of organ at risk (OAR) using a deep learning model is reasonably accurate. This will considerably reduce the medical professional time in manually contouring the OAR and also reduce the interobserver variation among radiation oncologists. It allows for quick radiation planning which helps in adaptive radiotherapy planning. Materials and Methods: Head and neck (HN) computed tomography (CT) scan data of 113 patients were used in this study. CT scan was done as per the institute protocol. Each patient had about 100-300 slices in Dicom format. A total number of 19,240 images were used as the data set. The OARs were delineated by the radiation oncologist in the contouring system. Of the 113 patient records, 13 records were kept aside as test dataset and the remaining 100 records were used for training the UNet 2D model. The study was performed on the spinal cord and left and right parotids as OARs on HN CT images. The model performance was quantified using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) score. Results: The trained model is used to predict three OARs, spinal cord and left and right parotids. The DSC score of 84% and above could be achieved using the UNet 2D Convolutional Neural Network. Conclusion: This study showed that the accuracy of predicted organs was within acceptable DSC scores, even when the underlying dataset has significant interobserver variability.

Dosimetric predictors of toxicity in a randomized study of short-course vs conventional radiotherapy for glioblastoma.

PURPOSE: There is no consensus on appropriate organ at risk (OAR) constraints for short-course radiotherapy for patients with glioblastoma. Using dosimetry and prospectively-collected toxicity data from a trial of short-course radiotherapy for glioblastoma, this study aims to empirically examine the OAR constraints, with particular attention to left hippocampus dosimetry and impact on neuro-cognitive decline. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Data was taken from a randomized control trial of 133 adults (age 18-70 years; ECOG performance score 0-2) with newly diagnosed glioblastoma treated with 60 Gy in 30 (conventional arm) versus 20 (short-course arm) fractions of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02206230). The delivered plan's dosimetry to the OARs was correlated to prospective-collected toxicity and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) data. RESULTS: Toxicity events were not significantly increased in the short-course arm versus the conventional arm. Across all OARs, delivered radiation doses within protocol-allowable maximum doses correlated with lack of grade ≥ 2 toxicities in both arms (p < 0.001), while patients with OAR doses at or above protocol limits correlated with increased grade ≥ 2 toxicities across all examined OARs in both arms (p-values 0.063-0.250). Mean left hippocampus dose was significantly associated with post-radiotherapy decline in MMSE scores (p = 0.005), while the right hippocampus mean dose did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.277). Compared to the original clinical plan, RapidPlan left hippocampus sparing model decreased left hippocampus mean dose by 43 % (p < 0.001), without compromising planning target volume coverage. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial, protocol OAR constraints were appropriate for limiting grade ≥ 2 toxicities in conventional and short-course adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for glioblastoma. Higher left hippocampal mean doses were predictive for neuro-cognitive decline post-radiotherapy. Routine contouring and use of dose constraints to limit hippocampal dose is recommended to minimize neuro-cognitive decline in patients with glioblastoma treated with chemoradiotherapy.