Prevention of osteoporosis in population older than 50 from Colombia: An intervention model from a nutrieconomics perspective

Introduction: Osteoporosis is a chronic disease characterized by a decrease in the density of bone mass, making bone more porous, less resistant and of lower quality than normal bone. This leads to the deterioration of its microstructure, making the bone more fragile and therefore increasing the risk of fracture. It has been found that high concentrations of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium promote the absorption of minerals such as calcium, magnesium, and phosphorus and thus increase mineral density. Due to the great social and economic impacts of osteoporosis, it is necessary to develop interventions that can be easily adopted at the population level, improving the quality of life of individuals without significantly affecting the health system. Objective: Assessing the impact of increased dairy consumption on the Colombian population diagnosed with osteoporosis between 2015 and 2020 through the simulation of the potential impact fraction (PIF). Methods: Using data from the Integrated Social Protection Information System (SISPRO) and National Nutritional Situation Survey (ENSIN), the incidence, the frequency of milk consumption, the potential impact fraction (PIF), and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) were estimated. Results: A total of 63,640 cases of osteoporosis were identified. The highest incidence was observed in 2019. Seventeen food groups were identified in the ENSIN, and the most frequent products consumed by respondents over 50 years of age were milk, cheese, and yogurt. The PIF was then analysed, with a calcium intake of 600 mg/ day, and a significant difference in the decrease in the number of cases was observed. In 2019, a higher estimated DALY loss of 9.9 was observed. In women, years of life lost due to fractures were the highest in the 65-69 age group. In men, they were highest in the 75-79 age group. Discussion: We observed that the departments with the highest consumption of dairy products were the capital of the country and regions where dairy products factories are located. It was not possible to establish an association between socioeconomic strata and low dairy intake. Nevertheless, some authors have proposed that westernization of diets and low income reduce access to fresh fruits and milk derivates. Conclusion: Years lost due to disability increased in the population over 60 years of age. In the PIF analysis, a decrease in cases was observed when the population increased consumption of dairy products.

Introducción: La osteoporosis es una enfermedad crónica caracterizada por una disminución de la densidad de la masa ósea que hace que el hueso sea más poroso, menos resistente y de menor calidad que el hueso normal. Esto conduce al deterioro de su microestructura, por lo que el hueso se hace más frágil y, por lo tanto, aumenta el riesgo de fractura. Se ha encontrado que las altas concentraciones de Lactobacillus y Bifidobacterium promueven la absorción de minerales como calcio, magnesio y fósforo y, por lo tanto, aumentan la densidad mineral. Debido a los grandes impactos sociales y económicos de la osteoporosis, es necesario desarrollar intervenciones que puedan ser fácilmente adoptadas a nivel poblacional con el fin de mejorar la calidad de vida de los individuos sin afectar significativamente el sistema de salud. Objetivo: Evaluar el impacto del aumento del consumo de lácteos en la población colombiana con diagnóstico de osteoporosis entre 2015 y 2020 mediante la simulación de la fracción de impacto potencial (PIF). Materiales y métodos: Estudio ecológico realizado en adultos mayores de 50 años con diagnóstico de osteoporosis. A partir de los registros del Sistema Integrado de Información de Protección Social (SISPRO) y la Encuesta Nacional de Situación Nutricional (ENSIN), se estimó la incidencia, la frecuencia de consumo de leche, el PIF y los años de vida ajustados por discapacidad (AVAD). Resultados: Se identificaron un total de 63 640 casos de osteoporosis en SISPRO, la mayor incidencia se observó en 2019. Se establecieron 17 grupos de alimentos en la ENSIN, los productos más frecuentes consumidos en población mayor de 50 años fueron leche, queso y yogur. En el cálculo del PIF se encuentra que con una ingesta de calcio de 600 mg/día se reduciría significativamente el número de casos. En 2019 se observó una mayor pérdida estimada de AVAD de 9,9. En las mujeres, los años de vida perdidos debido a fracturas fueron más altos en el grupo de edad de 65 a 69 años. En los hombres, fue más alta en el grupo de edad de 75-79 años. Discusión: Observamos que los departamentos con mayor consumo de productos lácteos fueron la capital y las regiones donde se encuentran las fábricas de productos lácteos. No fue posible establecer una asociación entre los estratos socioeconómicos y la baja ingesta de lácteos. Sin embargo, algunos autores han propuesto que la occidentalización de las dietas y los bajos ingresos reducen el acceso a frutas frescas y derivados de la leche. Conclusión: Los años perdidos por discapacidad aumentaron en la población mayor de 60 años. En el análisis PIF, se observó una disminución en los casos (reducción de 2329 casos/ año) cuando la población aumentó el consumo de productos lácteos.

Creación de protocolo de implementación de un Servicio de Enlace Post Fractura a través del Modelo Lógico en Hospital Público Universitario de la Región Metropolitana de Santiago

Introducción: Las fracturas osteoporóticas, especialmente de cadera y columna, conllevan una significativa morbimortalidad, y el riesgo de fractura de cadera aumenta en un 50% tras una fractura previa. A nivel global y en Chile, persiste una baja tasa de tratamiento de la osteoporosis post fractura. La iniciativa "Capture the Fracture" de la International Osteoporosis Foundation propone prácticas óptimas, incluyendo Servicios de Enlace Post Fractura (FLS); sin embargo, en Chile, sólo existen dos FLS, ambos en el sector privado. Objetivo: Este estudio busca implementar el primer FLS en el ámbito público, específicamente en el Hospital Clínico Dra. Eloísa Díaz de La Florida. La metodología se basa en el Modelo Lógico, enfatizando la relevancia del recurso humano, especialmente una enfermera coordinadora. Resultados: Los resultados identifican el problema, recursos necesarios, acciones clave y metas a corto, mediano y largo plazo. Factores externos como el entorno hospitalario y colaboración con programas existentes se consideran. Se presenta un esquema gráfico del Modelo Lógico y se proponen indicadores de evaluación. Discusión: Es relevante abordar las fracturas por fragilidad como un problema de salud pública y en cuanto a esto, se destaca la aceptación de nuestro proyecto para su implementación por parte de las autoridades hospitalarias. Se espera que esta iniciativa inspire a otros centros de salud pública en Chile a implementar servicios similares, contribuyendo a cerrar la brecha de tratamiento y mejorar la calidad de vida de los pacientes.

Introduction: Osteoporotic fractures, especially of the hip and spine, entail significant morbidity and mortality, with a 50% increased risk of hip fracture following a prior fracture. Globally - and in Chile, a low rate of post-fracture osteoporosis treatment persists. The International Osteoporosis Foundation's "Capture the Fracture" initiative advocates optimal practices, including Fracture Liaison Services (FLS); however, in Chile, there are only two FLS, both in the private healthcare system. Objective: This study aims to implement the first FLS in the public domain, specifically at the Dra. Eloísa Díaz Clinical Hospital, at Santiago. The methodology is based on the Logic Model, emphasizing the importance of human resources, especially a coordinating nurse. Results: The findings identify the problem, necessary resources, key actions, and short, medium, and long-term goals. External factors such as the hospital environment and collaboration with existing programs are considered. A graphical representation of the Logic Model is presented, along with proposed evaluation indicators. Discussion: Addressing fragility fractures as a public health issue is pertinent, and hospital authorities' acceptance of our project for implementation is highlighted. This initiative is anticipated to inspire other public health centers in Chile to implement similar services, contributing to closing the treatment gap and enhancing patients' quality of life.

Bone Mineral Density, Trabecular Bone Score and Fractures in Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the bone mineral density (BMD), trabecular bone score (TBS), and fracture history of middle-aged patients hospitalized for heart failure (HF), as well as analyze the association of these factors with cardiometabolic parameters and muscle strength. METHODS: A cross-sectional study with patients aged 40 to 64 years hospitalized for HF was performed. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry was performed to obtain BMD and TBS. Fracture history, handgrip strength (HGS), and clinical and laboratory cardiometabolic parameters of the patients were evaluated. RESULTS: Altogether, 109 patients were evaluated (female 50.5%). Medians and interquartile ranges for age and length of hospital stay were 58.0 (53.0-61.0) years and 20.0 (11.0-32.0) days, respectively. Osteoporosis was observed in 15.6% of the patients, low TBS was observed in 22.8%, and 6 patients had a history of fragile fracture. No differences between the sexes regarding BMD (p=0.335) or TBS (p=0.736) classifications were observed. No association was observed between low BMD and HF classification (p>0.05) regarding the ejection fraction, ischemic etiology, or New York Heart Association Functional Classification. However, there was a significant association between high serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) and the presence of osteoporosis (62.5 [37.2-119.0] pg/mL vs. 34.2 [25.0-54.1] pg/mL; p=0.016). There was a negative correlation between serum PTH and TBS (r=-0.329, p=0.038) and a higher frequency of reduced HGS in patients with low TBS (92.3% vs. 50.0%; p=0.009). CONCLUSIONS: We found relevant frequencies of osteoporosis and bone microarchitecture degradation in middle-aged patients with HF, which were related to high serum PTH concentrations.

AGREEMENT ON MRI DIAGNOSIS IN COMPRESSIVE MALIGNANT VERTEBRAL FRACTURES.

Objective: Verify interobserver and intraobserver agreement of malignant compressive vertebral fractures (MCVF) diagnosis using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods: We retrospectively included a lumbar spine MRI of 63 patients with non-traumatic compressive vertebral fracture diagnoses. Each lumbar vertebra was classified as: without fracture, with fracture of benign characteristics, or with fracture of malignant characteristics. Two medical residents in radiology, one musculoskeletal radiologist fellow, one musculoskeletal radiologist, and two spine surgeons evaluated MRI exams, independently and blindly. Each observer performed two readings, with a 15-day interval between evaluations. A simple Kappa coefficient was used to calculate the intra and interobserver agreement. The reference standard classification was based on bone biopsy or clinical, and imaging follow-up of at least two years, for diagnostic performance analysis. Diagnostic performance was assessed by calculating sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: We observed substantial to perfect intraobserver agreement (kappa: 0.80 to 1.00) and substantial interobserver agreement (kappa 0.64 to 0.77). In general, the sensitivity for the detection of MCVF was moderate, except for the second-year radiology resident that achieved a lower sensitivity. The specificity, accuracy, and negative predictive value were high for all observers. Conclusion: MCVF diagnosis using MRI showed substantial interobserver agreement. The second-year medical resident achieved lower sensitivity but high specificity for MCVF. Regarding the seniors, there was no statistical significance between spine surgeons and the musculoskeletal radiologist. Level of Evidence III; Diagnostic.

Objetivo: Verificar a concordância interobservador e intraobservador no diagnóstico de fraturas vertebrais compressivas malignas (MCVF) por meio de ressonância magnética (MRI). Métodos: Incluiu-se retrospectivamente a ressonância magnética da coluna lombar de 63 pacientes com diagnóstico de fratura vertebral compressiva não traumática. Cada vértebra lombar foi classificada da seguinte forma: sem fratura, com fratura de características benignas ou com fratura de características malignas. Dois médicos residentes em radiologia, um pesquisador radiologista musculoesquelético, um radiologista musculoesquelético e dois cirurgiões da coluna vertebral avaliaram os exames de ressonância magnética, independentemente e cegamente. Cada observador realizou duas leituras, com um intervalo de 15 dias entre as avaliações. O coeficiente Kappa simples foi utilizado para calcular o acordo intra e interobservador. A classificação padrão de referência foi baseada em biópsia óssea ou clínica, e acompanhamento por imagem de pelo menos dois anos, para análise de desempenho diagnóstico. O desempenho diagnóstico foi avaliado através do cálculo de sensibilidade, especificidade, precisão, valores preditivos positivos e negativos com um intervalo de confiança de 95% (IC). Resultados: Foi observada concordância substancial a perfeita intraobservador (kappa: 0,80 a 1,00) e concordância substancial interobservador (kappa 0,64 a 0,77). Em geral, a sensibilidade para a detecção de MCVF foi moderada, exceto para o segundo ano de residência radiológica que alcançou uma sensibilidade menor. A especificidade, precisão e valor preditivo negativo foram altos para todos os observadores. Conclusão: O diagnóstico de MCVF por ressonância magnética mostrou uma concordância substancial entre observadores. O residente médico do segundo ano alcançou uma sensibilidade menor, mas alta especificidade para MCVF. Com relação aos veteranos, não houve significância estatística entre os cirurgiões da coluna vertebral e o radiologista músculo-esquelético. Nível de Evidencia III; Diagnóstico .

Participação plurissocial para aumentar a inclusão e a assertividade nas tomadas de decisão em saúde relacionadas a tratamentos da osteoporose / Pluri-social participation to increase inclusion and assertiveness in health decision-making related to osteoporosis treatments

Embora as fraturas por fragilidade sejam importantes detratoras de qualidade de vida relacionada à saúde, aumentando a morbimortalidade e acarretando alto impacto clínico, psicossocial e econômico, elas são pouco valorizadas e negligenciadas por médicos e até mesmo por pacientes. Além disso, os critérios de priorização para avaliação de novas tecnologias, em geral, não consideram critérios além dos financeiros para uma tomada de decisão mais inclusiva e assertiva para o tratamento da população de mais alto risco de fratura. Assim, este artigo visa revisitar alguns diferentes pontos de vista e trazer uma reflexão sobre critérios e prioridades na osteoporose. Para isso, foi considerada a perspectiva de múltiplos atores no processo de tomada de decisão em saúde, bem como analisadas as falhas na atenção a uma doença de alta prevalência e que, além do grande impacto econômico gerado para a sociedade, causa repercussões emocionais, incapacidade gerada por fraturas e medo de novas quedas ou pequenos traumas.

Although fragility fractures are important detractors of health-related quality of life, increasing morbidity and mortality and causing a high clinical, psychosocial, and economic impact, they are undervalued and neglected by physicians and even patients. In addition, prioritization criteria for evaluating new technologies, in general, do not consider criteria other than financial ones for a more inclusive and assertive decision-making for the treatment of the population at higher risk of fracture. Thus, this article aims to revisit some different points of view and bring a reflection on criteria and priorities in osteoporosis. For this, the perspective of multiple stakeholders in the health decision-making process was considered, as well as the failures in the care of this highly prevalent disease that, in addition to the great economic impact generated for society, causes emotional repercussions, disability generated by fractures and fear of further falls or minor trauma.

Use of the SARC-F Score as an Aid in Fragility Fractures Prevention.

Objective The present study aimed to relate the strength, assistance with walking, rising from a chair, climbing stairs, and falls (SARC-F) score with the presence or absence of fragility fracture in the population over 60 years of age. Methods The risk of sarcopenia was determined through the application of the SARC-F questionnaire, and the patients were divided into 2 groups, according to the occurrence or not of fragility fracture (n = 100). Results Thirty-two cases of distal radius fractures and eighteen cases of proximal femur fractures were identified. A higher score on the SARC-F is determinant between having or not a fragility fracture, estimating that for each point in the score there is a 70% increase in the chance of a patient having a fracture, regardless of age, gender, and body mass index (BMI). Conclusion There was a direct correlation between a higher score on the SARC-F and an increase in the chance of fragility fracture.

Eficácia e segurança de romosozumabe para o tratamento de osteoporose grave em mulheres na pós-menopausa: revisão sistemática e meta-análise em rede / Efficacy and safety of romosozumab for the treatment of severe osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: systematic and network meta-analysis

Introdução: A osteoporose é uma das principais causas de morbimortalidade, principalmente em idosos e mulheres na pós-menopausa, devido ao aumento da fragilidade óssea e maior suscetibilidade a fraturas. Objetivo: Avaliar a eficácia e segurança do romosozumabe, comparado aos tratamentos farmacológicos atualmente disponíveis no Sistema Único de Saúde para o manejo de mulheres na pós-menopausa com osteoporose grave e alto risco de fraturas. Métodos: Foi realizada uma busca seguida por meta-análises indiretas, por ensaios clínicos randomizados (ECR) nas bases PubMed Central e Medline, Embase e Cochrane Library e por busca manual. O risco de viés (RoB 2.0) e a qualidade da evidência (GRADE) foram analisados. Meta-análises indiretas foram realizadas para desfechos de fraturas, densidade mineral óssea e eventos adversos. Resultados: Sete ECR (n= 19.951 mulheres) foram incluídos nesta revisão. Romosozumabe seguido de alendronato reduziu risco de fraturas não vertebrais em 12 meses (RR: 0,64, IC 95%: 0,49-0,84; alta certeza de evidência) e em 24 meses (RR: 0,52, IC 95%: 0,43-0,64; (alta certeza de evidência) na comparação ao alendronato. Achados semelhantes foram identificados para outros desfechos. Ácido zoledrônico foi associada a maior risco de descontinuação por evento adverso que placebo (RR: 1,02, IC 95%: 1,01-1,03). Conclusão: Foi identificado que romosozumabe ou romosozumabe seguido por alendronato são eficazes e seguros na comparação com alendronato.

Background: Osteoporosis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, especially in the elderly and postmenopausal women, due to increased bone fragility and greater susceptibility to fractures. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of romosozumab, compared to pharmacological treatments currently available in the Unified Health System of Brazil for the management of postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis and high risk of fractures. Methods: A search was carried out followed by indirect meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in PubMed Central and Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases and manual search. Risk of bias (RoB 2.0) and quality of evidence (GRADE) were assessed. Indirect frequentist meta-analyses were carried out for outcomes related to fractures, bone mineral density, and adverse events. Results: Seven RCTs (n= 19,951 woman) were included in this review. Romosozumab followed by alendronate reduced the risk of non-vertebral fractures at 12 months (RR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.49-0.84; high certainty of evidence) and at 24 months (RR: 0.52, CI 95 %: 0.43-0.64; (high certainty of evidence) in comparison to alendronate. Similar findings were identified for other outcomes. Zoledronic acid was associated with a higher risk of discontinuation due to adverse events than placebo (RR: 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01-1.03). Conclusion: This review identified that romosozumab or romosozumab followed by alendronate are effective and safe compared to alendronate.

Use of the SARC-F Score as an Aid in Fragility Fractures Prevention / O uso do escore SARC-F como auxiliar na prevenção de fraturas por fragilidade

Abstract Objective The present study aimed to relate the strength, assistance with walking, rising from a chair, climbing stairs, and falls (SARC-F) score with the presence or absence of fragility fracture in the population over 60 years of age. Methods The risk of sarcopenia was determined through the application of the SARC-F questionnaire, and the patients were divided into 2 groups, according to the occurrence or not of fragility fracture (n = 100). Results Thirty-two cases of distal radius fractures and eighteen cases of proximal femur fractures were identified. A higher score on the SARC-F is determinant between having or not a fragility fracture, estimating that for each point in the score there is a 70% increase in the chance of a patient having a fracture, regardless of age, gender, and body mass index (BMI). Conclusion There was a direct correlation between a higher score on the SARC-F and an increase in the chance of fragility fracture.

Resumo Objetivo O presente estudo teve como objetivo relacionar o escore strength, assistance with walking, rising from a chair, climbing stairs, and falls (SARC-F) com a presença ou não de fratura por fragilidade na população acima de 60 anos. Métodos O risco de sarcopenia foi determinado por meio da aplicação do questionário SARC-F, sendo os pacientes divididos em 2 grupos, de acordo com a ocorrência ou não de fratura por fragilidade (n = 100). Resultados Foram levantados 32 casos de fratura de rádio distal e 18 casos de fratura de fêmur proximal. Uma maior pontuação no SARC-F determina bem entre ter ou não ter fratura por fragilidade, estimando que a cada ponto a mais no escore há um acréscimo de 70% na chance de o paciente ter fratura, independentemente da idade, sexo e índice de massa corporal (IMC). Conclusão Houve correlação direta entre uma maior pontuação no SARC-F e aumento na chance de fratura por fragilidade.

Agreement on mri diagnosis in compressive malignant vertebral fractures / Concordância no diagnóstico por rm em fraturas vertebrais malignas compressivas

ABSTRACT Objective: Verify interobserver and intraobserver agreement of malignant compressive vertebral fractures (MCVF) diagnosis using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods: We retrospectively included a lumbar spine MRI of 63 patients with non-traumatic compressive vertebral fracture diagnoses. Each lumbar vertebra was classified as: without fracture, with fracture of benign characteristics, or with fracture of malignant characteristics. Two medical residents in radiology, one musculoskeletal radiologist fellow, one musculoskeletal radiologist, and two spine surgeons evaluated MRI exams, independently and blindly. Each observer performed two readings, with a 15-day interval between evaluations. A simple Kappa coefficient was used to calculate the intra and interobserver agreement. The reference standard classification was based on bone biopsy or clinical, and imaging follow-up of at least two years, for diagnostic performance analysis. Diagnostic performance was assessed by calculating sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: We observed substantial to perfect intraobserver agreement (kappa: 0.80 to 1.00) and substantial interobserver agreement (kappa 0.64 to 0.77). In general, the sensitivity for the detection of MCVF was moderate, except for the second-year radiology resident that achieved a lower sensitivity. The specificity, accuracy, and negative predictive value were high for all observers. Conclusion: MCVF diagnosis using MRI showed substantial interobserver agreement. The second-year medical resident achieved lower sensitivity but high specificity for MCVF. Regarding the seniors, there was no statistical significance between spine surgeons and the musculoskeletal radiologist. Level of Evidence III; Diagnostic.

RESUMO Objetivo: Verificar a concordância interobservador e intraobservador no diagnóstico de fraturas vertebrais compressivas malignas (MCVF) por meio de ressonância magnética (MRI). Métodos: Incluiu-se retrospectivamente a ressonância magnética da coluna lombar de 63 pacientes com diagnóstico de fratura vertebral compressiva não traumática. Cada vértebra lombar foi classificada da seguinte forma: sem fratura, com fratura de características benignas ou com fratura de características malignas. Dois médicos residentes em radiologia, um pesquisador radiologista musculoesquelético, um radiologista musculoesquelético e dois cirurgiões da coluna vertebral avaliaram os exames de ressonância magnética, independentemente e cegamente. Cada observador realizou duas leituras, com um intervalo de 15 dias entre as avaliações. O coeficiente Kappa simples foi utilizado para calcular o acordo intra e interobservador. A classificação padrão de referência foi baseada em biópsia óssea ou clínica, e acompanhamento por imagem de pelo menos dois anos, para análise de desempenho diagnóstico. O desempenho diagnóstico foi avaliado através do cálculo de sensibilidade, especificidade, precisão, valores preditivos positivos e negativos com um intervalo de confiança de 95% (IC). Resultados: Foi observada concordância substancial a perfeita intraobservador (kappa: 0,80 a 1,00) e concordância substancial interobservador (kappa 0,64 a 0,77). Em geral, a sensibilidade para a detecção de MCVF foi moderada, exceto para o segundo ano de residência radiológica que alcançou uma sensibilidade menor. A especificidade, precisão e valor preditivo negativo foram altos para todos os observadores. Conclusão: O diagnóstico de MCVF por ressonância magnética mostrou uma concordância substancial entre observadores. O residente médico do segundo ano alcançou uma sensibilidade menor, mas alta especificidade para MCVF. Com relação aos veteranos, não houve significância estatística entre os cirurgiões da coluna vertebral e o radiologista músculo-esquelético. Nível de Evidencia III; Diagnóstico.

No Más Fracturas - Implementación de la primera Unidad de Coordinación de Fracturas en Chile: experiencia al año de funcionamiento / Implementation of a fracture liaison service. Experience with 177 patients

BACKGROUND: Every year about 9 million fragility fractures (FF) occur worldwide and 80% of these are underdiagnosed or undertreated. Aiming to close the gap of diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis, Fracture Liaison Services (FLS) were developed. AIM: To describe the implementation of the first FLS in Chile, its inclusion criteria, patient enrolment, treatment adherence and referrals during the first year. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A FLS was implemented at a health care network composed by two hospitals. The International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) guidelines were applied with a nurse practitioner as the coordinator. From May 2020 to April 2021 all patients diagnosed with a FF in the emergency rooms were invited to participate. Patients with pathological fractures and active cancer were excluded. Demographical data, fracture location, previous fractures, treatment and adherence, and mortality were recorded. RESULTS: From 443 patients with a diagnosis of FF, 177 patients (40%) accepted to participate. Their mean age was 74 ± 13 years and 84% (149) were female. Forty eight percent (84) had a lower extremity FF. Hip fractures were the most common (67). Ninety-five patients reported previous FF and 11,2% (20) had received anti-osteoporotic treatment. At four months of follow-up, 62% (50) had received vitamin D and calcium supplementation and 20% (16) of those patients with an indication of anti-osteoporotic drugs, had received them. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of the FLS was successful with a 40% enrolment of patients, receiving certification by the IOF.

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TBS SCORE, BONE DENSITY AND FRACTURES IN OLDER MEN: INTEGRATIVE REVIEW.

Population ageing is an inexorable truth. This is the reason for an increase in the number of studies analyzing common pathologies, such as osteoporosis, in older people. Osteoporosis is a disease resulting from bone fragility, thus increasing the risk of fracture. Although the occurrence is predominant in women, studies analyzing the male population have raised interest among the scientific community. Nevertheless, there is no consensus regarding the best way to estimate the risk of fracture. Bone density testing and TBS (trabecular bone score) assessments are alternatives available for diagnosing. To assess the relationship between bone mineral density, the changes in TBS and fractures in older men. We conducted an integrative review of the literature in the LILACS, Scopus and PubMed databases, searching for studies in the last five years. We found 97 studies, and five of these matched our guiding question. We found five articles that matched our selecting criteria. All five presented the importance of using TBS for a better accuracy in improving the estimate of risk of fracture in older men. The association of TBS with bone density is important to best estimate the risk of fracture in elder men. Level of Evidence II, Diagnostic Studies.

O envelhecimento populacional é uma realidade inexorável. Portanto o número de estudos relacionados às patologias comuns em idosos, como a osteoporose, tende a crescer. A osteoporose é uma doença caracterizada pelo aumento da fragilidade óssea, elevando o risco de fratura. Embora seja uma patologia predominante em mulheres, os estudos analisando a população masculina tem despertado interesse na comunidade científica. Entretanto, ainda não há consenso sobre a melhor forma estimar o risco de fratura. A densitometria óssea e a avalição do trabecular bone score (TBS) são alternativas disponíveis para o diagnóstico. Avaliar a relação entre a densidade mineral óssea, a alteração do TBS e a presença de fratura em idosos masculinos. Realizou-se uma revisão integrativa da literatura nas bases de dados LILACS, Scopus e PubMed, procurando estudos realizados nos últimos cinco anos. Foram encontrados 97 estudos, sendo que cinco se adequavam aos nossos critérios de seleção. Todos os estudos mostraram a importância do uso do TBS para uma melhor acurácia no intuito de aprimorar a estimativa do risco de fratura em homens idosos. A associação do TBS com a densidade óssea é útil para estimar de forma mais adequada o risco de fratura. Nível de Evidência II, Estudos Diagnósticos.

FRAGILITY FRACTURES IN BRAZIL: CROSS-SECTION STUDY.

Objective: To evaluate the involvement of orthopedists and orthopedic residents with fragility fractures, in its clinical, therapeutic, and social aspects. Methods: Cross-sectional observational and prospective study that took place in the period from June to August 2020. Results: 540 participants were analyzed. The population consisted of orthopedists (85.56%; N = 462) and residents (14.44%; N = 78), with a greater proportion of individuals from 41 to 50 years of age (36.67%; N = 198) and from the Southeast region (57.22%; N = 309). For 47.04% (N = 254) of the participants, the profile of the patient at risk for fragility fracture corresponds to: woman, sedentary, smoker and over 60 years of age. The consensus among the participants (97.96%; N = 529) is that fragility fractures occur in or near home environments. Moreover, 47.59% (N = 257) believe that the first fragility fracture is the most important predictive risk factor for subsequent occurrences and 63.89% (N = 345) of the participants claim to attend more than 15 cases per year. Regarding treatment, 74.44% (N = 402) are dedicated exclusively to orthopedic aspects (68.33%; N = 369). However, 62.41% (N = 337) of the participants believe that patients with fragility fractures should receive medication and supplements. Likewise, 70.74% (N = 382) of the participants consider that home security measures and training of family members are important, and they attribute the role to the multidisciplinary team. Conclusions: Fragility fractures are frequent in the routine of Brazilian orthopedists. However, they are not familiar with adjuvant treatments for fragility fractures, acting almost exclusively in the orthopedics aspects of these injuries. Level of Evidence II, Prospective Study.

Objetivo: Avaliar o entendimento entre ortopedistas e residentes em ortopedia sobre as fraturas por fragilidade, em seus aspectos clínicos, terapêuticos e sociais. Métodos: Estudo transversal, observacional e prospectivo que ocorreu no período de junho de agosto de 2020. Resultados: Foram analisados 540 participantes. A população foi composta por ortopedistas (85,56%; N = 462) e residentes (14,44%; N = 78), com prevalência de idade entre 41 e 50 anos (36,67%; N=198) e oriundos da região Sudeste (57,22%; N = 309). Para 47,04% (N = 254) dos participantes o perfil do paciente em risco para fratura por fragilidade corresponde a: mulher, sedentária, tabagista e acima dos 60 anos de idade. Sendo consenso entre os participantes (97,96%; N = 529) que as fraturas por fragilidade ocorrem em ambientes domiciliares ou próximo a eles. Além disso, 47,59% (N = 257) dos participantes acreditam que a primeira fratura por fragilidade seja o fator de risco preditivo mais importante para novo episódio de fratura e 63,89% (N = 345) dos avaliadores atendem mais de 15 casos por ano. Em relação ao tratamento, 74,44% (N = 402) dedicam-se exclusivamente aos aspectos ortopédicos (68,33%; N = 369). No entanto, 62,41% (N = 337) dos participantes acreditam que paciente devam receber medicamentos e suplementos. Da mesma forma, 70,74% (N = 382) dos avaliadores consideram que medidas de segurança domiciliar e treinamento de familiares sejam importantes e atribuídas a equipe multiprofissional. Conclusão: As fraturas por fragilidade são frequentes na rotina dos ortopedistas brasileiros. No entanto, estes não estão familiarizados com tratamentos adjuvantes nas fraturas consideradas por fragilidade, atuando quase que exclusivamente nos aspectos ortopédicos envolvidos nestas lesões. Nível de Evidência II, Estudo Prospectivo.

Incidence of fractures and clinical profile of patients following up at a Fracture Liaison Service in the city of Curitiba.

BACKGROUND: Osteoporotic fractures are common, and their incidence are increasing worldwide. The first fracture doubles the risk of new fractures. Despite that, up to 80% of patients with a fragility fracture are evaluated or treated to reduce the risk of new fractures. AIMS: To evaluate the results of the operation of the hospital Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) and to analyze the clinical characteristics of the patients attending the service in its first 2 years of operation and to estimate the fracture risk reduction ratio. METHODS: The FLS managed patients older than 50 years who were admitted with a low-energy trauma fracture between January 2017 and April 2018. This management consists in a full medical evaluation, nutritional and physical activity guidance, and specific osteoporosis treatment, if needed. RESULTS: We monitored and treated 135 patients. Forty percent of them had a previous fracture and only 20.3% of them received treatment to prevent new fractures. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, the estimated incidence of new fractures over 24 months was 12.1% (95% CI 7.2-20.8%), indicating that the percentage of patients without new fractures due to bone fragility during treatment was estimated at 87.9% (95% CI 79.2-92.8%). CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation and treatment of patients who sustained a fragility fracture to prevent a secondary fracture is effective in reducing the risk of new fractures in high-risk patients.

Vertebroplastia percutánea en fracturas vertebrales osteoporóticas / Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral fractures

La osteoporosis es una enfermedad sistémica que deteriora la calidad del hueso y su arquitectura. Como consecuencia, predispone a fracturas por fragilidad, entre las cuales las fracturas vertebrales son frecuentes. Estas se asocian a una gran morbimortalidad. La vertebroplastia ha surgido en 1984 como alter-nativa terapéutica para tratar algunos tumores vertebrales y fracturas vertebrales osteoporóticas dolorosas. Este procedimiento consiste en la inyección de cemento guiado por imágenes, para estabilizar la vértebra fracturada y disminuir el dolor. La vertebroplastia puede ser realizada con anestesia local, sedación o anestesia general. La fuga de cemento fuera de la vértebra es una complicación común; sin embargo esto no suele tener traducción clínica y solamente se trata de un hallazgo imagenológico. En este artículo revisaremos las indicaciones, contraindicaciones, la eficacia, controversias y las complicaciones de la vertebroplastia percutánea. (AU)

Osteoporosis is a systemic disease characterized by bone quality deterioration. As a consequence of this deterioration, osteoporosis results in high fracture risk due to bone fragility. Fractures to the spine are common in this scenario, and relate to an increased morbi-mortality. Vertebroplasty emerged in 1984 as an alternative to treat painful vertebral tumors and osteoporotic vertebral fractures. This procedure relies on image guided cement injection to achieve pain relief and strengthen the vertebral body. Vertebroplasty can be performed under local anesthesia, mild sedation, or general anesthesia. Among its complications, cement leakage is common but it is rarely associated with any symptoms and it is usually an imaging finding. In this article, we will review indications and contraindications, effectiveness, controversies and complications related to percutaneous vertebroplasty. (AU)

Relationship between tbs score, bone density and fractures in older men: integrative review / Relação entre o escore tbs, densidade óssea e fraturas em homens idosos: revisão integrativa

ABSTRACT Population ageing is an inexorable truth. This is the reason for an increase in the number of studies analyzing common pathologies, such as osteoporosis, in older people. Osteoporosis is a disease resulting from bone fragility, thus increasing the risk of fracture. Although the occurrence is predominant in women, studies analyzing the male population have raised interest among the scientific community. Nevertheless, there is no consensus regarding the best way to estimate the risk of fracture. Bone density testing and TBS (trabecular bone score) assessments are alternatives available for diagnosing. To assess the relationship between bone mineral density, the changes in TBS and fractures in older men. We conducted an integrative review of the literature in the LILACS, Scopus and PubMed databases, searching for studies in the last five years. We found 97 studies, and five of these matched our guiding question. We found five articles that matched our selecting criteria. All five presented the importance of using TBS for a better accuracy in improving the estimate of risk of fracture in older men. The association of TBS with bone density is important to best estimate the risk of fracture in elder men. Level of Evidence II, Diagnostic Studies.

RESUMO O envelhecimento populacional é uma realidade inexorável. Portanto o número de estudos relacionados às patologias comuns em idosos, como a osteoporose, tende a crescer. A osteoporose é uma doença caracterizada pelo aumento da fragilidade óssea, elevando o risco de fratura. Embora seja uma patologia predominante em mulheres, os estudos analisando a população masculina tem despertado interesse na comunidade científica. Entretanto, ainda não há consenso sobre a melhor forma estimar o risco de fratura. A densitometria óssea e a avalição do trabecular bone score (TBS) são alternativas disponíveis para o diagnóstico. Avaliar a relação entre a densidade mineral óssea, a alteração do TBS e a presença de fratura em idosos masculinos. Realizou-se uma revisão integrativa da literatura nas bases de dados LILACS, Scopus e PubMed, procurando estudos realizados nos últimos cinco anos. Foram encontrados 97 estudos, sendo que cinco se adequavam aos nossos critérios de seleção. Todos os estudos mostraram a importância do uso do TBS para uma melhor acurácia no intuito de aprimorar a estimativa do risco de fratura em homens idosos. A associação do TBS com a densidade óssea é útil para estimar de forma mais adequada o risco de fratura. Nível de Evidência II, Estudos Diagnósticos.

Fragility fractures in brazil: cross-section study / Fraturas por fragilidade no brasil: estudo transversal

ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the involvement of orthopedists and orthopedic residents with fragility fractures, in its clinical, therapeutic, and social aspects. Methods: Cross-sectional observational and prospective study that took place in the period from June to August 2020. Results: 540 participants were analyzed. The population consisted of orthopedists (85.56%; N = 462) and residents (14.44%; N = 78), with a greater proportion of individuals from 41 to 50 years of age (36.67%; N = 198) and from the Southeast region (57.22%; N = 309). For 47.04% (N = 254) of the participants, the profile of the patient at risk for fragility fracture corresponds to: woman, sedentary, smoker and over 60 years of age. The consensus among the participants (97.96%; N = 529) is that fragility fractures occur in or near home environments. Moreover, 47.59% (N = 257) believe that the first fragility fracture is the most important predictive risk factor for subsequent occurrences and 63.89% (N = 345) of the participants claim to attend more than 15 cases per year. Regarding treatment, 74.44% (N = 402) are dedicated exclusively to orthopedic aspects (68.33%; N = 369). However, 62.41% (N = 337) of the participants believe that patients with fragility fractures should receive medication and supplements. Likewise, 70.74% (N = 382) of the participants consider that home security measures and training of family members are important, and they attribute the role to the multidisciplinary team. Conclusions: Fragility fractures are frequent in the routine of Brazilian orthopedists. However, they are not familiar with adjuvant treatments for fragility fractures, acting almost exclusively in the orthopedics aspects of these injuries. Level of Evidence II, Prospective Study.

RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar o entendimento entre ortopedistas e residentes em ortopedia sobre as fraturas por fragilidade, em seus aspectos clínicos, terapêuticos e sociais. Métodos: Estudo transversal, observacional e prospectivo que ocorreu no período de junho de agosto de 2020. Resultados: Foram analisados 540 participantes. A população foi composta por ortopedistas (85,56%; N = 462) e residentes (14,44%; N = 78), com prevalência de idade entre 41 e 50 anos (36,67%; N=198) e oriundos da região Sudeste (57,22%; N = 309). Para 47,04% (N = 254) dos participantes o perfil do paciente em risco para fratura por fragilidade corresponde a: mulher, sedentária, tabagista e acima dos 60 anos de idade. Sendo consenso entre os participantes (97,96%; N = 529) que as fraturas por fragilidade ocorrem em ambientes domiciliares ou próximo a eles. Além disso, 47,59% (N = 257) dos participantes acreditam que a primeira fratura por fragilidade seja o fator de risco preditivo mais importante para novo episódio de fratura e 63,89% (N = 345) dos avaliadores atendem mais de 15 casos por ano. Em relação ao tratamento, 74,44% (N = 402) dedicam-se exclusivamente aos aspectos ortopédicos (68,33%; N = 369). No entanto, 62,41% (N = 337) dos participantes acreditam que paciente devam receber medicamentos e suplementos. Da mesma forma, 70,74% (N = 382) dos avaliadores consideram que medidas de segurança domiciliar e treinamento de familiares sejam importantes e atribuídas a equipe multiprofissional. Conclusão: As fraturas por fragilidade são frequentes na rotina dos ortopedistas brasileiros. No entanto, estes não estão familiarizados com tratamentos adjuvantes nas fraturas consideradas por fragilidade, atuando quase que exclusivamente nos aspectos ortopédicos envolvidos nestas lesões. Nível de Evidência II, Estudo Prospectivo.

Osteoporotic spine fractures treated with kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty: a meta-analysis / Fraturas osteoporóticas da coluna tratados com cifoplastia ou vertebroplastia: uma metanálise / Fracturas osteoporóticas de la columna vertebral tratadas con cifoplastía o vertebroplastía: un metaanálisis

ABSTRACT Kyphoplasty (KP) and vertebroplasty (VP) are both widely adopted treatments for patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVF), however, which of these techniques is more effective has not yet been established. We performed a systematic review of articles, followed by meta-analysis, in an attempt to establish the differences between KP and VP. Initially, 187 articles were obtained, 20 of which were systematically reviewed and submitted to meta-analysis. Thus, 2,226 patients comprised the universe of the present article, 1202 of whom underwent KP and 1024 of whom underwent VP. The statistically significant results observed included lower mean bone cement leakage (ml) in the group submitted to kyphoplasty, with OR: 1.50 [CI95%: 1.16 - 1.95], p <0.05; shorter mean surgical time (minutes), 0.45 [CI90% 0.08 - 0.82], p <0.1, for the group submitted to VP as compared to the KP group; and a lower mean postoperative Oswestry Disability Index score in the KP group, OR: −0.14 [CI95%: −0.28 - 0.01], p <0.05. KP was more effective in improving physical function and had a lower frequency of cement leakage when compared to VP, although it requires longer surgical time. Level of evidence III; Systematic review of level III studies.

RESUMO Tanto a cifoplastia (KP) quanto a vertebroplastia (VP) são tratamentos bastante adotados para pacientes com fratura vertebral osteoporótica (FVO), no entanto, ainda não foi estabelecido qual destas é a técnica de maior eficácia. Realizamos uma revisão sistemática de artigos, seguida de metanálise, na tentativa de estabelecer as diferenças entre KP e VP. Foram obtidos inicialmente 187 artigos, sendo que destes, 20 foram revisados sistematicamente e submetidos à metanálise. Assim, 2226 pacientes compuseram o universo do presente artigo, sendo 1202 destes submetidos à KP e 1024 à VP. Entre os resultados estatisticamente significativos, foi observado um menor extravasamento médio de cimento ósseo (ml) no grupo submetido à cifoplastia, OR: 1,50 [IC 95%: 1,16 - 1,95], p < 0,05; o tempo médio de operação (minutos) 0,45 [IC 90%: 0,08 - 0,82], p < 0,1, na comparação entre KP e VP é menor no grupo submetido à vertebroplastia e no pós-cirúrgico, o Índice Médio de Incapacidade de Oswestry foi menor no grupo KP OR: −0,14 [IC 95% −0,28 - 0,01], p < 0,05. A KP foi mais eficaz na melhora da função física e menor frequência de extravasamento de cimento quando comparada à VP embora demande maior tempo cirúrgico. Nível de evidência III; Revisão sistemática de estudos de nível III.

RESUMEN Tanto la cifoplastía (KP) como la vertebroplastía (VP) son tratamientos ampliamente adoptados en pacientes con fractura vertebral osteoporótica (FVO), sin embargo, aún no se ha establecido cuál de ellas es la técnica más eficaz. Se realizó una revisión sistemática de artículos, seguida de un metaanálisis, en un intento de establecer las diferencias entre KP y VP. Inicialmente se obtuvieron 187 artículos, de los cuales 20 fueron revisados sistemáticamente y sometidos a un metaanálisis. Así, 2226 pacientes constituyeron el universo del presente artículo, 1202 de ellos sometidos a KP y 1024 a VP. Entre los resultados estadísticamente significativos, se observó una menor extravasación media de cemento óseo (ml) en el grupo sometido a cifoplastía, OR: 1,50 [IC 95%: 1,16 - 1,95], p <0,05; el tiempo medio de intervención (minutos) 0,45 [IC 90% 0,08 - 0,82], p <0,1, en la comparación entre KP y VP es menor en el grupo sometido a vertebroplastía y en el posquirúrgico, el Índice de Discapacidad de Oswestry promedio fue menor en el grupo KP OR: −0,14 [IC 95 % CI −0,28 - 0,01], p <0,05. La KP fue más eficaz en la mejora de la función física y con menor frecuencia de extravasación de cemento en comparación con la VP, aunque requiere un tiempo quirúrgico más prolongado. Nivel de evidencia III; Revisión sistemática de estudios de nivel III.

Síndrome metabólico, metformina y hueso / Metabolic syndrome, metformin and bone

El síndrome metabólico se define como un trastorno heterogéneo y multifactorial con riesgo cardiovascular elevado. Actualmente se encuentra en franco crecimiento debido al sedentarismo y la ingesta rica en grasas y azúcares. Su tratamiento incluye la indicación de cambios en el estilo de vida, con realización de actividad física y una alimentación saludable e hipocalórica. Cuando esto no es eficaz, se pueden utilizar diferentes fármacos, y entre los más prescriptos se encuentra la metformina, caracterizada por su acción insulino-sensibilizante. Numerosos trabajos han estudiado la vinculación del síndrome metabólico con el tejido óseo. Se demostró como resultado general, aunque no concluyente, que dicho síndrome se asocia con una disminución de la densidad mineral ósea y un aumento en la incidencia de fracturas osteoporóticas. Una de las limitaciones de estos estudios clínicos estaría ligada a la gran heterogeneidad de los pacientes con síndrome metabólico. Por otra parte, y dado que diversos estudios preclínicos han sugerido posibles acciones osteogénicas de la metformina, se ha investigado el posible efecto óseo de un tratamiento con este fármaco en personas con hiperglucemia o disglucemia. Varios estudios clínicos muestran que este efecto sería nulo o, en algunos casos, de carácter protector para el sistema óseo. No obstante, se debería tener precaución en el uso de dicho fármaco en pacientes que necesiten dosis altas y/o posean riesgo elevado de fractura, ya que sus altas concentraciones podrían tener consecuencias negativas sobre el metabolismo óseo. (AU)

Metabolic syndrome is defined as a heterogeneous and multifactorial disorder with high cardiovascular risk. Its incidence is currently growing due to sedentary lifestyles and diets with a high intake of fats and sugars. Treatment for metabolic syndrome begins with changes in lifestyle, such as physical activity and a healthy and hypocaloric diet. When this is not effective, different drugs can be used, and one of the most frequently prescribed is the insulin-sensitizer metformin. Numerous investigations have evaluated the possible link between metabolic syndrome and alterations in bone metabolism. Although not conclusive, most clinical studies point to an association between metabolic syndrome, a decrease in bone mineral density and an increase in the incidence of osteoporotic fractures. However, an important limitation of these studies is the great heterogeneity of individuals with metabolic syndrome. In view of preclinical research indicating possible osteogenic actions of metformin, the effects on bone of metformin has been evaluated in patients with hyperglycemia. Most studies have found either no effect on fracture incidence, or a mild protective action. However, since elevated concentrations of metformin might negatively affect bone metabolism, caution should be taken when prescribing this drug for patients who require high doses, and/or have an excess fracture risk. (AU)

Diagnostic, treatment, and follow-up of osteoporosis-position statement of the Latin American Federation of Endocrinology.

The Latin American Federation of Endocrinology position statement on osteoporosis was developed by endocrinologists from 9 countries. It encompasses the definition, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of the disease, the identification of barriers to healthcare, and proposals to improve the disease care in the region. INTRODUCTION: There is a gap in the understanding of osteoporosis in Latin America. The objective of this work is to state the position of the Latin American Federation of Endocrinology on osteoporosis care in postmenopausal women to better bridge this gap. METHODS: An experts' panel was formed comprising of 11 endocrinologists from 9 countries. A data search was conducted with a conceptual approach and data selection was based on the hierarchy of the EBHC pyramid. Unpublished data was considered for local epidemiological data and expert opinion for the identification of barriers to healthcare. An expert consensus based on the Delphi methodology was carried out. Experts were asked to respond on a 5-point Likert Scale to two provided answers to guiding questions. RESULTS: Consensus was agreed on the answer for the questions with the higher median on the Likert scale and synthetized on 16 statements covering the definition of osteoporosis, diagnostic approach, treatment options, and follow-up. Besides clinical topics, unmet needs in osteoporosis were identified in relation to local epidemiological data, barriers to treatment, and misclassification of programs within health systems. CONCLUSIONS: Through a process based on recognized methodological tools, FELAEN's position on osteoporosis was developed. This made it possible to state an optimum scenario for the care of the disease and helped to identify knowledge gaps. There is great variability in the approach to osteoporosis in Latin America and barriers in all the stages of healthcare persist.

Prevalencia de factores de riesgo en pacientes mayores de 50 años con fracturas clásicas de fragilidad atendidos en un hospital de tercer nivel de complejidad en Boyacá / Prevalence of risk factors in patients older than 50 years with classic fragility fractures treated in a third level complexity hospital in Boyacá (Colombia)

RESUMEN Introducción: Las fracturas por fragilidad son una complicación frecuente de la osteoporosis y generan alto impacto en la calidad de vida del adulto mayor. Las fracturas de cuello femoral, radio distal, húmero proximal y vértebras toracolumbares, en el contexto de un traumatismo menor, se consideran fracturas por fragilidad. Objetivo: Identificar la prevalencia de factores de riesgo en personas mayores de 50 arios con fracturas por fragilidad atendidas en un hospital del departamento de Boyacá. Metodología: Estudio observacional, descriptivo y de corte transversal. Se incluyeron 242 pacientes que presentaron fracturas por fragilidad con diagnóstico confirmado por estudio imagenológico. Resultados: El 62,8% de la población fue femenina. La edad condiciona un aumento del número de fracturas de fémur. El 10,7% de la población tenía un antecedente de fractura, con un aumento de la prevalencia a mayor edad. La fractura de radio distal fue la más frecuente en el 36,8% de la población. Cerca del 40% de los pacientes eran hipertensos y el 7,9% tenía diabetes, en tanto que el 9,7% eran consumidores crónicos de inhibidores de la bomba de protones. El 2,4% consumía glucocorticoides previamente al evento. Conclusiones: El comportamiento poblacional de las fracturas por fragilidad en nuestra ins titución es similar al de otros lugares, tanto a escala nacional como internacional. Por tanto, es importante empezar a crear conciencia sobre la prevención secundaria de la osteoporo sis, con el fin de disminuir las complicaciones, mejorar los desenlaces y disminuir los gastos que consigo trae.

ABSTRACT Introduction: Fragility fractures are a frequent complication of osteoporosis and lead to increased morbidity and mortality, as well as decreasing quality of life of the elderly popu lation, and represents high costs for health care systems. After minor trauma, fractures of the femoral neck, distal radius, proximal humerus, and thoraco-lumbar vertebrae are associated with osteoporosis, and are considered fragility fractures. Objective: To identify the prevalence of risk factors in people over 50 years of age with fragility fractures treated at a third level hospital in the department of Boyacá, Colombia. Methodology: Observational, descriptive, retrospective cross-sectional study. An evaluation was made on 242 patients between 50 and 100 years of age with any of the previously mentioned 4 fragility fractures. Fracture diagnosis had to be confirmed by plain radiography or computed tomography. Results: The majority (62.8%) of the study population was female. Age was associated with an increase in the number of femur fractures. A history of previous fractures was observed in 10.7% of the cases, with prevalence increasing with age. Distal radius fracture was the most frequent in 36.8% of the population. About 40% of the patients had hypertension and 7.9% were diabetic. Chronic use of proton pump inhibitors was observed in 9.7%, and 2.4% consumed glucocorticoids prior to the event. Conclusions: The behaviour of fragility fractures of the population in our institution is simi lar to that of other places, both nationally and internationally. It is therefore important to start raising awareness about secondary prevention of osteoporosis, in order to reduce complications, improve outcomes, and reduce associated costs.