Tubo-Ovarian ectopic pregnancy: A rare twin ectopic pregnancy.

The most common twin ectopic pregnancy is heterotopic (1/7000). We are reporting a rare case of twin tubo-ovarian ectopic pregnancy, which was presented in the emergency department of Ayub Teaching Hospital Abbottabad. A 30- year-old female arrived with worsening lower abdominal pain persisting for three weeks. She also had per-vaginal bleeding with passage of clots 1week ago. Clinical examination revealed a tense abdomen with tenderness in the left iliac fossa. Per-vaginally, there was cervical motion tenderness and fullness in the posterior fornix. Beta HCG level revealed a sub-optimal rise whereas Transabdominal ultrasound showed an echogenic shadow in the left ovary. The uterus appeared normal. On exploratory laparotomy a large left ovarian mass was seen with ruptured chronic right tubal pregnancy with adhesions. On cut-section of the ovary, a small foetus was evident. We have concluded that in case of subacute abdominal pain and an-echogenic mass on ultrasonography in reproductive age contralateral adnexa should be accessed to exclude contralateral ectopic pregnancy.

Primary Ovarian Pregnancy: A Case Report With a Review of the Literature.

Ectopic pregnancy (EP) constitutes 1%-2% of all pregnancies and is one of the leading causes of maternal morbidity and mortality. The most common site of ectopic pregnancy is the ampulla. Ectopic ovarian pregnancy (EOP) is one of the rare events, with an incidence of 0.5%-3% of all pregnancies. The incidence is higher in intrauterine device users or assisted reproductive techniques. The precise aetiology and pathogenesis of EOP remain elusive. Clinically, EOP mirrors the presentation of tubal pregnancy or a ruptured luteal cyst, often leading to life-threatening hypovolemic shock. Transvaginal sonography is the primary diagnostic tool. Still pinpointing the exact location early on poses challenges, and it's usually misinterpreted as a tubo-ovarian mass, hemorrhagic cyst, or luteal cyst. Furthermore, while a suboptimal rise in serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (ß-hCG) levels may indicate pregnancy, it doesn't definitively confirm EOP. Only histopathological examination offers a conclusive diagnosis. This paper discusses an EOP case in a young woman who experienced five months of amenorrhea and exhibited no traditional risk factors, underscoring the significant challenges inherent in preoperative diagnosis.

Ovarian ectopic pregnancy: clinical characteristics, ultrasound diagnosis and management.

OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical, ultrasound and biochemical characteristics of ovarian ectopic pregnancies (OEP) to tubal ectopic pregnancies (TEP). METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective, case-control study of women with OEP compared to women with TEP between December 2010 and February 2021. OEP was defined as a pregnancy located completely or partially within the ovarian parenchyma, seen separately to a corpus luteum, where a corpus luteum was within the ipsilateral ovary. We compared demographic features, risk factors, clinical presentation, ultrasound findings and outcomes such as blood loss at surgery, blood transfusion rate, length of hospital stay, follow-up and future pregnancy outcomes of women who conceived. RESULTS: 20 women with OEP were identified and compared to 100 women with TEP. 15/20 (75%) OEPs were diagnosed correctly on the first scan. There was no difference between the groups in terms of maternal age, gestational age, gravidity, parity or risk factors. Compared to TEPs, OEPs were more likely to present with abdominal pain without vaginal bleeding (12/20 (60%) vs 13/100 (13%) (p=<0.01) (OR 10; 95%CI 3.45-29.20)), were more likely to contain an embryo (3/20 (15%) vs 2/100 (2%) (p=0.02) (OR 8.7; 95%CI 1.34-55.65)), have severe hemoperitoneum on ultrasound scan (9/20 (45%) vs 8/100 (8%) (p=<0.01) (OR 9.4; 95%CI 3.01-29.40)) and had higher blood loss at surgery (median 700ml vs 100ml, p=<0.01). All surgically managed OEPs had successful laparoscopic treatment (18 excisions, 1 wedge resection) with preservation of the ovary. Only 1/20 (5%) OEPs required a blood transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: OEPs are more likely than TEPs to contain an embryo and to present with severe hemoperitoneum. In a dedicated early pregnancy setting the majority of OEPs could be detected on ultrasound scan at the initial visit, facilitating optimal minimally invasive surgical management, reducing the risk of blood transfusions and oophorectomy. Our findings can be used as a reference for clinicians who may not otherwise encounter this rare condition. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Nontubal ectopic pregnancies: overview of diagnosis and treatment.

Nontubal ectopic pregnancies occur as a result of embryo implantation outside the uterine cavity and fallopian tubes. Sites include ovary, cervix, abdominal cavity, interstitial portion of fallopian tube, and cesarean scar. Nontubal pregnancies are uncommon. Nonspecific signs and symptoms of nontubal ectopic pregnancies make diagnosis challenging and, in many cases, significantly delayed, resulting in a high rate of morbidity. Although surgical management remains the mainstay of treatment, there is growing evidence that some of these can be managed medically or with the use of a combination of medical and surgical approaches with good outcome. This review summarizes the current diagnostic modalities, therapeutic options, and outcomes for nontubal ectopic pregnancies. Diagnostic and management options may be limited, especially in resource-restricted settings. Therefore, an understanding of the available options is critical. It needs to be emphasized that the rarity of cases and the difficulties in organizing ethically justified randomized trials result in the lack of well-established management guidelines for nontubal ectopic pregnancies.

Coexistence of Ovarian Endometrioma and Ovarian Pregnancy: A Case Report.

Both ovarian pregnancy and endometrioma can rupture and cause life-threatening hemoperitoneum. However, little is known about their coexistence. We report the case of a 34-year-old Japanese woman with a life-threatening hemoperitoneum in the first trimester coexisting with ovarian endometrioma and ovarian pregnancy. The patient was hospitalized in our department for acute hypogastric pain and massive hemoperitoneum during pregnancy. She had a history of miscarriage at eight weeks of gestation one year prior. Her serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) level was >2,000 mIU/mL. Also, a transvaginal ultrasound showed an empty uterus, an intact right ovary, an inhomogeneous left ovary, and a massive hemoperitoneum. An exploratory laparoscopy revealed a rupture of the left ovarian endometrioma, a left corpus luteal cyst, and intraperitoneal bleeding of approximately 1,200 mL. However, no ectopic lesions were observed. Microscopic examination revealed an endometriotic cyst with decidual changes in the stroma, a corpus luteal cyst, and chorionic villi with hemorrhage. Serum beta-hCG levels became negative on the 27th postoperative day. The postoperative course was uneventful. This case shows that, in addition to the differential diagnosis of ovarian pregnancy from ovarian endometrioma, clinicians should consider the coexistence of both conditions.

Challenges of Management of Ruptured Second Trimester Ovarian Pregnancy in Low-and Middle-Income Settings: A Case Report.

Background: Ovarian ectopic pregnancy is a rare form of non-tubal ectopic pregnancy. It can rupture before the end of the first trimester, causing hemoperitoneum, and present with signs and symptoms similar to other commoner abdominal emergencies or the pregnancy can continue intraperitoneally. Therefore, they are not often diagnosed preoperatively. Ultrasound can assist in diagnosis of ovarian ectopic pregnancy but the findings could be ambiguous or inconclusive. We present a case of ruptured ovarian ectopic pregnancy at the second trimester causing massive hemoperitoneum that was suspected as an intrabdominal malignancy co-existing with intrabdominal pregnancy. Case presentation: She was a 34 year-old Nigerian unbooked G4P3+0, (3 alive), who presented to the labor ward on 21st January, 2021 with a complaint of a 6-week history of abdominal pain and swelling. Pain was insidious in onset, generalized, non-colicky, non-radiating, constant, no known aggravating or relieving factor, but it was of moderate intensity. She had amenorrhea with a positive serum pregnancy test without prior early ultrasound. At presentation, initial abdominopelvic ultrasound revealed intra-uterine viable pregnancy but repeat ultrasound done showed a left adnexal ectopic gestation and an echo-rich intraperitoneal fluid collection. Laparotomy was done and ovarian pregnancy was accurately diagnosed intra-operatively. Tissue samples from the ovary confirmed normal products of conception, namely chorionic villi, trophoblastic cells and ovarian stroma at histology. Conclusion: Despite advances in imaging techniques, the diagnosis of ovarian ectopic gestation is still very difficult. When premenopausal women present with amenorrhea, generalized non-colicky abdominal pain and swelling in combination with ambiguous findings of pregnancy on ultrasound in the absence of trauma, differential diagnoses should include ruptured ovarian pregnancy. Obstetricians should maintain a high index of suspicion to forestall delayed diagnosis and the potential maternal morbidity and mortality. However, the need for high-index of suspicion should be for any ectopic, not just ovarian pregnancy.

Ovarian Pregnancy.

Ovarian pregnancy is a rare uncommon presentation of an ectopic pregnancy. Without any known risk factors, ovarian pregnancy seems to appear at random. A 29-year-old female patient with previous two cesarean deliveries visited the gynecology emergency department with the complaint of constant dull aching pain in the lower abdomen, aggravated by postural changes. Per vaginal examination, cervical motion tenderness was present. The patient was admitted, and her transvaginal sonography was done along with a urine pregnancy kit test for the suspicion of ectopic gestation. After the initial treatment and arrangement of two units of packed red blood cells after proper grouping and cross-matching for the patient, laparotomy was done. At the time of surgery, left-sided ruptured ovarian pregnancy was confirmed by the Spiegelberg criteria.

Unruptured ovarian ectopic pregnancy: Two case reports and literature review.

In clinical practice, ovarian pregnancy is extremely rare and is always found to be ruptured. A definitive diagnosis for ruptured ovarian pregnancy is difficult to obtain. We present two cases of unruptured ovarian pregnancies detected during laparoscopy and review existing literature to better understand the clinical characteristics of ectopic pregnancies in this rare site. Intrauterine devices, assisted reproductive technology, and intrauterine operations are all high-risk factors in ovarian pregnancy. Moreover, menopause, abdominal pain, and vaginal bleeding are clinical manifestations. Ovarian pregnancy can be diagnosed using serum hCG, transvaginal ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging. Laparoscopy is the treatment of choice for ovarian pregnancy. It is recommended that the intact gestational sac be excised and the ovarian function be protected to the greatest extent possible during the operation. More definitive diagnosis of ovarian pregnancy must be reported in order to gain a better understanding of ovarian pregnancy.

Clinical analysis of women with ovarian pregnancy: a retrospective case-control study.

BACKGROUND: To address the clinical features and potential risk factors of ovarian pregnancy (OP). METHODS: In this retrospective case-control study performed in West China Second University Hospital from March 17, 2005 to December 8, 2018, 146 OP patients were selected as a case group, 292 patients with tubal pregnancy (TP) and 292 women with intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) were matched as controls at a ratio of 1:2:2. RESULTS: When compared with TP patients, OP patients tend to have worse clinical complications (hemorrhagic shock (7.41% vs 2.89%), rupture of pregnancy sac (54.07% vs 37.78%), hemoperitoneum (363.1 ± 35.46 ml vs 239.3 ± 27.61 ml) and increased need for emergency laparotomy (9.60% vs 3.97%) at an early gestational age. Assisted reproductive technology (ART) (adjusted OR1 2.08, 95%CI 1.04 to 4.18; adjusted OR2 2.59, 95%CI 1.25 to 5.37) and intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD) use (adjusted OR1 2.19, 95%CI 1.10 to 4.36; adjusted OR2 2.77, 95%CI 1.74 to 5.71) may be risk factors for ovarian ectopic pregnancy as compared to the control groups of TP and IUP patients. CONCLUSIONS: OP patients tend to have more severe clinical complications and this study has identified ART and IUD use as potential risk factors for OP. Results of this study may contribute to improve the understanding of OP and promote early surgical intervention.

Rupture of Ectopic Ovarian Pregnancy Accompanied by Massive Intra-abdominal Bleeding and Disorder of the Coagulation Mechanism: A Rare and Life-Threatening Obstetric Complication.

The rupture of ectopic ovarian pregnancy accompanied by massive intra-abdominal bleeding is a rare obstetric complication, occurs predominantly in the first trimester of pregnancy, and can be dangerous and life-threatening for the pregnant woman. Our case describes a 37yr old woman with a history of 4 lower segment Cesarian sections (LSCS) (Caesarean sections) and multiple surgical abortions, presenting at the ER with acute abdomen symptoms. The patient's hemodynamic status was unstable. The positive urine pregnancy test combined with the clinical and ultrasound findings established the diagnosis of the ruptured ectopic pregnancy, and immediate surgical treatment was decided. During surgery, a large amount of blood was found in the peritoneal cavity, resulting from a rupture of the right ovary and accompanied by hemorrhagic infiltration of adjacent tissues, without participation in the damage of the ipsilateral fallopian tube. It was deemed necessary to remove the ipsilateral adnexa and whole blood transfusion. The patient was discharged from our department on the fourth postoperative day. The price of beta-chorionic gonadotropic hormone was on a downward trend. Three weeks later, the level of beta-chorionic gonadotropic hormone was zero. In the present paper, a brief review is attempted regarding the diagnostic and therapeutic approach for patients with ruptured ectopic ovarian pregnancy after describing the case.

Ovarian pregnancy after bilateral salpingectomy in a patient with in vitro fertilization: a case report.

Ovarian pregnancy is rare but may occur with in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer in women who have undergone bilateral salpingectomy. We report a case of an approximately 30-year-old woman who had in vitro fertilization and a history of bilateral salpingectomy, and was diagnosed with an ovarian pregnancy. Laparoscopic enucleation of the gestational product in the ovary and ovarian remnant reconstruction were performed. The patient recovered well after surgery and was discharged home 5 days postoperatively. ß-human chorionic gonadotropin was undetectable 3 weeks after the surgery. Awareness of the possibility of ovarian pregnancy after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer is the most important step in an early diagnosis and treatment. Salpingectomy should be carefully performed to eliminate the risk of heterotopic pregnancy, especially in cases where a subsequent gestation is desired.

Spontaneous ovarian and intrauterine non-viable heterotopic pregnancy at 12 weeks of gestation: A case report.

Introduction: Spontaneous heterotopic pregnancy is a clinical condition in which both intrauterine and extrauterine pregnancies occur simultaneously. An ectopic pregnancy in the ovary is extremely rare in the absence of risk factors. Case presentation: A 37-year-old woman presented at 12 weeks of gestation with complaints of abdominal pain and intermittent bleeding. A transvaginal and pelvic ultrasound revealed two gestations with no cardiac activity. An ovarian pregnancy was removed via laparoscopy, and an intrauterine pregnancy was removed via curettage. The patient was discharged the following day in good health. Conclusion: The ovaries are rare sites for heterotopic pregnancy. Early pelvic ultrasound during the first trimester should be routine to obtain an accurate diagnosis and proper management of such cases.

Concurrent Ovarian and Tubal Ectopic Pregnancy After IVF-ET: Case Report and Literature Review.

Ovarian pregnancy (OP) coupled with tubal ectopic pregnancy is rare. We present a case of coexistent ovarian and tubal ectopic pregnancies in the same adnexa resulting from in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) for tubal occlusion. The patient presented with mild vaginal bleeding without abdominal pain. OP was diagnosed via sonographic findings of an ectopic gestational sac (GS) and yolk sac that seemed to be inside her left ovary. Laparoscopic exploration confirmed this diagnosis, and ipsilateral tubal ectopic pregnancy was suspected during surgery. The patient underwent left salpingectomy and resection of the ovarian lesion. A subsequent histopathological examination verified the diagnosis of coexistent ovarian and tubal ectopic pregnancy. Though the mechanism underlying concurrent OP and tubal ectopic pregnancy is still unclear, clinicians should be cautious of potential combined ectopic pregnancy when dealing with patients who have received more than one embryo transfer.

Diagnosis and management of ectopic ovarian pregnancy: a rare case report.

INTRODUCTION: Ovarian pregnancy is a rare form of ectopic pregnancy. Its incidence is 0.5% to 1% of all ectopic gestations, or 1 in 7000 to 40,000 live births. The diagnosis is intricate and based on surgical and histopathological observations. Traditional risk factors for ovarian ectopic pregnancy are similar to those for tubal pregnancy, but use of an IUD seems to be disproportionately associated. CASE REPORT: We report a rare case of spontaneous ectopic ovarian pregnancy of a 40-year-old woman, diagnosed with a ovarian pregnancy by ultrasound and treated by laparotomy in emergency obstetrical department of Ibn Rochd University Hospital of Casablanca. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Ovarian ectopic pregnancies occur through fertilization of an egg retained in the peritoneal cavity leading to implantation on the surface of the ovary. The increased incidence of ovarian ectopic pregnancies is associated with the increased use of artificial reproductive technologies (ART) and intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUCDs). The diagnosis is difficult and a constant challenge for the gynecologist. Its management remains surgical therapy despite the progress in medical treatment. CONCLUSION: Ovarian pregnancy is a rare entity that has some special features. Its diagnosis is difficult and relies on criteria based on intraoperative findings. Its management remains surgical therapy despite the progress in medical treatment.

Similar but different: A comparison of rare site ectopic pregnancies.

OBJECTIVES: A comparative examination of the clinical, laboratory, ultrasound findings, and operative characteristics of rare site located ectopic pregnancies. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all department cases of rare site located ectopic pregnancies diagnosed and treated from December 2006 to December 2019. RESULTS: Thirty rare ectopic pregnancies were identified. Of these, 11 were ovarian, 10 were interstitial and 9 were tubal stump. The patients treated for ovarian pregnancy had significantly lower human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) levels than patients treated for interstitial or stump pregnancies (2025 ± 1105 mIU/ml, 18,424 ± 2579 mIU/ml and 11,204 ± 9221 mIU/ml, respectively, p = 0.003). The main presenting symptom in patients with an ovarian pregnancy was abdominal pain (90.9%, 60.0% and 44.4%, respectively, p = 0.031). Signs of abdominal peritoneal irritation (i.e., rebound tenderness and guarding) were more frequent upon physical examination in patients with an ovarian pregnancy (72.2%, 30.0% and 22.2%, respectively, p = 0.044) who also exhibited the highest rates of syncope and hypovolemic shock upon admission compared to patients with an interstitial or stump pregnancy (54.5%, 10.0% and 11.1%, respectively, p = 0.031). Ovarian pregnancies were associated with the lowest sonographic detection rates (9.1%, 80.0% and 100%, respectively, p = 0.0001) and with free fluid in the pouch of Douglas (72.7%, 20.0% and 22.2%, respectively, p = 0.02). Ovarian pregnancies experienced the highest rupture rate during surgery compared to interstitial or stump pregnancies (66.9%, 16.7% and 44.4%, respectively, p = 0.028), had a significantly higher estimated blood loss (1081 ± 647 ml, 760 ± 597 ml and 343 ± 318 ml, respectively, p = 0.003) and required blood transfusions in the perioperative period (63.6%, 20.0% and 11.1%, respectively, p = 0.025) significantly more often. CONCLUSIONS: Ovarian pregnancy remains the most challenging diagnosis compared to interstitial and tubal stump ectopic's. Health care providers should recognize these rare site ectopic pregnancies and to handle these gynecological emergencies promptly.

Retrospective analysis of a case report of a left ovarian ectopic pregnancy after the former tubal.

Up to 2% of pregnancies may be extrauterine. Despite reproductive problems, they might increase the risk of serious complications. We present a case report of a 31-year-old woman with two extrauterine pregnancies - tubal and ovarian, which occurred at the same side with little time difference. In addition, we aimed to examine possible reasons underlying this rare pathology. Thus, surgically removed tissue specimens were morphologically assessed and further compared with specimens from healthy control patients. Telocytes were analysed in detail due to their pivotal role in the female reproductive system. Our study had observational character and obvious limitations typical for a clinical case. Yet, such a clinical case of two ectopic pregnancies has not been previously reported in the literature.

Ovarian pregnancy rupture following ovulation induction and intrauterine insemination: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Ovarian pregnancy after assisted reproductive technology treatment has rarely been reported; ovarian pregnancy following intrauterine insemination (IUI) is even rarer, and only nine cases have previously been reported. CASE SUMMARY: We report a case of ovarian pregnancy rupture after ovulation induction and IUI. The patient presented with bilateral lower abdominal pain and was referred to the emergency department. Ultrasound examination revealed ovarian pregnancy and intraperitoneal bleeding. Laparoscopy revealed an ovarian pregnancy with hemoperitoneum, which was subsequently removed. Pelvic adhesions were detected intraoperatively, which were treated immediately. The patient spontaneously conceived an intrauterine pregnancy 3 mo later, which was ongoing at the time of writing this study. CONCLUSION: Close attention should be paid to any history of pelvic inflammatory disease before commencing IUI treatment,and patients with such a history should be closely followed up after IUI. Early measurement of serum ß-human chorionic gonadotropin levels and ultrasonic examination are essential for timely diagnosis of ovarian pregnancy after ovulation induction and IUI to avoid more serious complications.

Catch Me While You Scan: Primary Ovarian Pregnancy.

Primary ovarian pregnancy is rare, accounting for 0.5%-3.0% of all ectopic gestations. It was earlier diagnosed by the classical Spiegelberg's criteria. Ultrasonographic diagnostic criteria have now been described for preoperative diagnosis. We report a case of primary ovarian pregnancy in a 30-year-old woman, where the diagnosis was made preoperatively, and discuss the challenges in diagnosis and management for optimal patient outcomes.

Analysis of Surgical Procedure of Four Cases of Ovarian Pregnancies Treated with Laparoscopic Surgery.

Ovarian pregnancy is a rare disease, accounting for 0.5%-3% of ectopic pregnancies. Ovarian pregnancy risk factors and preoperative diagnosis have been extensively reported. However, its histopathology and surgical findings have been poorly studied. To examine appropriate surgical procedures, we investigated the clinical features, surgical findings, and histopathological examinations of four ovarian pregnancy cases treated in our hospital. In histopathological examination, most specimens did not contain ovarian tissues; in some cases, villous tissues were buried in a clot. Therefore, evaluating the appropriateness of surgical resection range from histopathological images was difficult. However, the postoperative course was favorable; no cases manifested complications. Considering all these facts, we regarded the surgical procedures of the four cases in this study as appropriate. For the treatment of ovarian pregnancies, especially for the outward development type, a sufficient therapeutic effect may be achieved even without extensive excision of the ovarian tissues by laparoscopic surgery.

A Case of Heterotopic Ovarian Pregnancy after in vitro Fertilization: Early Diagnosis and Single-port Access Conservative Laparoscopic Treatment.

Here, we reported the case of a 32-year-old pregnant woman who presented with sudden abdominal pain at 5 weeks of gestation and diagnosed as ruptured heterotopic ovarian pregnancy. She was conceived after in vitro fertilization. Right ovarian pregnancy was noticed, and we performed right ovarian wedge resection via single-port access laparoscopic surgery. Intrauterine pregnancy had remained intact, and she delivered a term baby. Rapid diagnosis in early gestation and minimally invasive laparoscopy resulted in a satisfactory pregnancy outcome without other complications. Single-port laparoscopic surgery can be feasible and appears to be a good first treatment option in a ruptured heterotopic ovarian pregnancy.