El tratamiento del dolor agudo pediátrico en España EN 2021: resultado de una encuesta nacional entre anestesiólogos pediátricos / The management of paediatric acute pain in Spain IN 2021: Results of a national survey among paediatric anaesthesiologists

Objetivo: Mejorar el conocimiento acerca de la práctica clínica habitual en el tratamiento del dolor agudo pediátrico en España.MétodosSe llevó a cabo una encuesta telemática a través de Internet en una muestra representativa de profesionales sanitarios involucrados en el tratamiento del dolor agudo pediátrico (concretamente anestesiólogos) en España. La encuesta incluyó 28 cuestiones acerca de su práctica clínica habitual en la valoración y el tratamiento del dolor agudo, así como aspectos formativos y organizativos en el dolor agudo pediátrico.ResultadosLa encuesta fue completada durante el mes de marzo de 2021 por 150 especialistas en anestesiología. Los encuestados presentaron una amplia experiencia en el tratamiento del dolor agudo pediátrico (media de años de experiencia: 14,3; DE: 7,8) y básicamente en dolor agudo postoperatorio (97% casos). Aunque el 80% de los mismos utilizaba de modo habitual escalas validadas de valoración de dolor agudo pediátrico, solo el 2,6% utilizaba las específicas adaptadas para pacientes con discapacidad cognitiva. La mayoría de los encuestados empleaba habitualmente fármacos analgésicos como el paracetamol (99%) o el metamizol (92%), pero solo el 84% los complementaba con alguna técnica de bloqueo loco-regional u otra medicación tipo antiinflamatorio no esteroideo (62%). Además, únicamente un 62,7% reconocía haber recibido formación específica en dolor agudo pediátrico, solo un 45% seguía protocolos institucionales hospitalarios y un escaso 28% lo hacía a través de unidades de dolor infantil.ConclusionesLa encuesta identificó importantes puntos de mejora en la formación y organización del tratamiento del dolor agudo de los pacientes españoles en edad pediátrica. (AU)

Objective: To improve knowledge about routine clinical practice in the management of paediatric acute pain in Spain.MethodsA telematic survey was conducted via the Internet on a representative sample of healthcare professionals involved in the management of paediatric acute pain (specifically anaesthesiologists) in Spain. The survey included 28 questions about their usual clinical practice in the assessment and treatment of acute pain, and also training and organisational aspects in paediatric acute pain.ResultsThe survey was completed during March 2021 by 150 specialists in anaesthesiology. The respondents widely experienced in the management of acute paediatric pain (mean years of experience: 14.3: SD: 7.8), essentially in acute postoperative pain (97% of cases). Although 80% routinely used validated paediatric acute pain assessment scales, only 2.6% used specific scales adapted for patients with cognitive impairment. Most of the respondents routinely used analgesic drugs such as paracetamol (99%) or metamizole (92%), but only 84% complemented these drugs with a loco-regional blocking technique or other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (62%). Furthermore, only 62.7% acknowledged having received specific training in paediatric acute pain, only 45% followed hospital institutional protocols, and a scant 28% did so through paediatric pain units.ConclusionsThe survey identified important points for improvement in the training and organisation of acute pain management in Spanish paediatric patients. (AU)

The management of paediatric acute pain in Spain in 2021: Results of a national survey among paediatric anaesthesiologists.

OBJECTIVE: To improve knowledge about routine clinical practice in the management of paediatric acute pain in Spain. METHODS: A telematic survey was conducted via the Internet on a representative sample of healthcare professionals involved in the management of paediatric acute pain (specifically anaesthesiologists) in Spain. The survey included 28 questions about their usual clinical practice in the assessment and treatment of acute pain, and also training and organisational aspects in paediatric acute pain. RESULTS: The survey was completed during March 2021 by 150 specialists in anaesthesiology. The respondents widely experienced in the management of acute paediatric pain (mean years of experience: 14.3: SD: 7.8), essentially in acute postoperative pain (97% of cases). Although 80% routinely used validated paediatric acute pain assessment scales, only 2.6% used specific scales adapted for patients with cognitive impairment. Most of the respondents routinely used analgesic drugs such as paracetamol (99%) or metamizole (92%), but only 84% complemented these drugs with a loco-regional blocking technique or other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (62%). Furthermore, only 62.7% acknowledged having received specific training in paediatric acute pain, only 45% followed hospital institutional protocols, and a scant 28% did so through paediatric pain units. CONCLUSIONS: The survey identified important points for improvement in the training and organisation of acute pain management in Spanish paediatric patients.

Datos de remisión y manejo de una población oncológica a una unidad de dolor. ¿Qué podemos mejorar? / Review of the remission and management of a cancer related pain population to a pain unit. What can we improve?

Objetivos: Determinar las características demográficas, clínicas y de manejo analgésico de una población con dolor oncológico remitida a nuestra unidad de dolor (UD). Descripción de su manejo clínico una vez recibidos en la unidad. Detectar aspectos de mejora.Material y métodos: Estudio retrospectivo y descriptivo, realizado durante un periodo de 23 meses, entre noviembre de 2019 y diciembre de 2021, de todos los pacientes oncológicos derivados a la UD, cuya causa de derivación fuera dolor de origen oncológico.Resultados: Se analizaron 78 pacientes, el 63,2 % hombres y el 46,8 % mujeres. La edad media poblacional fue de 64,84 ± 12,623 años. El 44,7 % fueron remitidos por servicios quirúrgicos. El 75 % presentaba dolor moderado o severo. Los tumores más frecuentes fueron los abdominales (31,6 %), y cabeza y cuello (22,4 %). La causa del dolor fue en 48,7 % de los casos de la infiltración tumoral y en un 60,5 % un dolor de origen de mixto. En el momento de la remisión el 60 % de los pacientes recibía opioides mayores, con una dosis de equivalentes diarios de morfina (EDM) de 163,57 ± 167,10 mg y el 38 % recibía antineuropáticos. El tiempo medio para atender a estos pacientes desde el momento de solicitarla fue de 9,18 ± 9,73 días. Se realizó intervencionismo menor en el 56,6 % (43) de los pacientes y mayor en el 2,6 % (2). Se inició en la UD el tratamiento con fármacos antineuropáticos en el 68,4 % de los casos. Tras el manejo en la UD, un 72,4 % de los pacientes refirieron mejoría del dolor.Conclusiones: Mejorar la tasa de remisión de pacientes desde servicios como Oncología médica y Atención primaria. Mejorar los tiempos de remisión a las unidades de dolor. Ajustar mejor los tratamientos analgésicos antes de la remisión. Generar un protocolo de remisión sencillo de pacientes que incluyan pautas básicas de manejo del dolor. Mejorar el diagnóstico de dolor neuropático. Aumentar la cartera de servicios de intervencionismos de la UD....(AU)

Aim: Studying the demographic profile, clinical characteristics and analgesic management of an oncologic population sent to our pain unit. To describe the pain management in our unit. To detect management aspects to be improved.Methodology: Retrospective and descriptive study, performed in a period of 23 months, between November 2019 and December 2021, of all patients sent to our pain unit for cancer pain management.Results: A total of 78 patients were analyzed, 63,2 % men and 46,8 % women. The average age was 64,84 ± 12,623 years. 44,7 % were sent by surgical services. In 75% the pain was moderate or severe. The main cancer location was abdominal (31,6 %), and head and neck (22,4 %). In 48,7 % the pain was originated by tumoral infiltration and in 60,5 % the pain was judged to be mixed. At the moment of the arrival 60 % of patients were on opioids, with an average dose of 163,57 ± 167,10 mg EDM and 38 % were on antineurophatic drugs. The average time to attend the patients from the moment or request was 9,18 ± 9,73 days. A minor interventional procedure was performed in 56,6 % (43) of the patients, and a major intervention in 2,6 % (2). We started antineurophatic drugs in 68,4 % of the cases. During the period of pain management in our unit a 72,4% of the patients referred an improvement of their cancer related pain.Conclusions: It is necessary to improve the rate of remission from medical oncology departments and primary care physicians. To reduce the remission time to our unit from the referral services. To improve analgesic management before referral. To create an easy protocol for remission of patients that includes basic pain management instructions. To improve the rate of neuropathic pain diagnosis before referral. To expand our interventional technics portfolio. Pain units can improve cancer related pain management. To create multidisciplinary cancer pain comities.(AU)

How to Restart the Interventional Activity in the COVID-19 Era: The Experience of a Private Pain Unit in Spain.

INTRODUCTION: The situation generated in the health system by the COVID-19 pandemic has provoked a crisis involving the necessity to cancel non-urgent and oncologic activity in the operating room and in day-to-day practice. As the situation continues, the need to reinstate attention for patients with chronic pain grows. The restoration of this activity has to begin with on-site appointments and possible surgical procedures. On-site clinical activity has to guarantee the safety of patients and health workers. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review was to evaluate how to manage activity in pain units, considering the scenario generated by the pandemic and the implications of chronic pain on the immune system and proposed pharmacological and interventional therapies. METHODS: Besides the established general recommendations (physical distance, surgical masks, gloves, etc.), we established specific recommendations that will allow patient treatment and relieve the disruption of the immune response. It is important to highlight the use of opioids with the least influence in the immune system. Further, individualized corticoid use, risk assessment, reduced immune suppression, and dose adjustment should take patient needs into account. In this scenario, we highlight the use of radiofrequency and neuromodulation therapies, techniques that do not interfere with the immune response. CONCLUSIONS: We describe procedures to implement these recommendations for individual clinical situations, the therapeutic possibilities and safety guidelines for each center, and government recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Current management of breakthrough cancer pain according to physicians from pain units in Spain.

PURPOSE: Current evidence suggests the need to improve the management of breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP). For this reason, we aimed to assess the opinion of a panel of experts composed exclusively of physicians from pain units, who play a major role in BTcP diagnosis and treatment, regarding the key aspects of BTcP management. METHODS: An ad hoc questionnaire was developed to collect real-world data on the management of BTcP. The questionnaire had 5 parts: (a) organizational aspects of pain units (n = 12), (b) definition and diagnosis (n = 3), (c) screening (n = 3), (d) treatment (n = 8), and (e) follow-up (n = 7). RESULTS: A total of 89 pain-unit physicians from 13 different Spanish regions were polled. Most of them agreed on the traditional definition of BTcP (78.9%) and the key features of BTcP (92.1%). However, only 30.3% of participants used the Davies' algorithm for BTcP diagnosis. Respondents preferred to prescribe rapid-onset opioids [mean 77.0% (SD 26.7%)], and most recommended transmucosal fentanyl formulations as the first option for BTcP. There was also considerable agreement (77.5%) on the need for early follow-up (48-72 h) after treatment initiation. Finally, 65.2% of participants believed that more than 10% of their patients underused rapid-onset opioids. CONCLUSIONS: There was broad agreement among pain experts on many important areas of BTcP management, except for the diagnostic method. Pain-unit physicians suggest that rapid-onset opioids may be underused by BTcP patients in Spain, an important issue that need to be evaluated in future studies.

Unidades del dolor del siglo xxi. ¿protocolos de consenso o medicina basada en la evidencia? / 21st century pain units. consensus protocols or evidence-based medicine? / Unidades da dor do século xxi. protocolos de consenso ou medicina baseada na evidência?

Resumen La investigación en medicina tiene por objetivo generar nuevos conocimientos que ayuden al diagnóstico, el tratamiento y la prevención de enfermedades. Pero la medicina no es una ciencia exacta, sino una actividad humana heterogénea que se basa solo parcialmente en la ciencia, con varios factores no científicos que influyen en la forma de desarrollar esta actividad. El dolor, como síntoma o como enfermedad, es probablemente el trastorno que más afecta y preocupa a las personas y el que con mayor frecuencia motiva una consulta médica. A pesar de la magnitud del problema, y del interés médico y social por el dolor, la atención y el tratamiento de las personas con dolor crónico es un tema infravalorado o tratado inadecuadamente. Con base en múltiples preguntas que se plantean a lo largo del desarrollo del presente documento, nuestro objetivo es, por un lado, el de señalar que los cambios que se han producido en el manejo del dolor crónico hacen de los llamados protocolos de consenso un ejercicio obsoleto en la medicina del siglo XXI. Por otro lado, en términos de bioética, responder a la pregunta ¿se ajustan los protocolos de consenso al principio de beneficencia del paciente individual?

Abstract Research in medicine is intended to generate new knowledge to help in the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of disease. However, medicine is not an exact science; rather, it is a heterogeneous human activity based only partially on science and involves several non-scientific factors that influence the way it is developed. Pain, as a symptom or as a disease, is probably the disorder that most affects and worries people, and is what most often prompts medical consultation. Despite the magnitude of the problem, and the medical and social interest in pain, the care and treatment of persons with chronic pain is an issue that is undervalued or inadequately addressed. Based on variety of questions posed throughout this document, the objective is, on the one hand, to point out that the changes that have occurred in the way chronic pain is managed make the so-called consensus protocols an obsolete exercise in 21st century medicine. On the other hand, in terms of bioethics, the authors answer the question: Do consensus protocols conform to the principle of beneficence for the individual patient?

Resumo A pesquisa em medicina tem por objetivo gerar novos conhecimentos que ajudem no diagnóstico, tratamento e prevenção de doenças. Porém, a medicina não é uma ciência exata, mas sim uma atividade humana heterogênea que está apenas parcialmente baseada na ciência, com vários fatores não científicos que influenciam na maneira em que essa atividade é desenvolvida. A dor, como sintoma ou como doença, é provavelmente o transtorno que mais afeta e preocupa as pessoas e o que com maior frequência motiva uma consulta médica. Apesar da magnitude do problema e do interesse médico e social pela dor, o atendimento e o tratamento das pessoas com dor crônica é um tema subestimado ou tratado inadequadamente. Com base em múltiplas perguntas que são levantadas ao longo do desenvolvimento do presente trabalho, nosso objetivo é, por um lado, indicar que as mudanças que ocorreram na abordagem da dor crônica fazem dos chamados "protocolos de consenso" um exercício obsoleto na medicina do século XXI. Por outro lado, em termos de bioética, buscamos responder à pergunta: os protocolos de consenso se ajustam aos princípios de beneficência do paciente individual?

Editor's Choice-The organization of chest pain units: Position statement of the Acute Cardiovascular Care Association.

Chest pain units are defined as organizational short stay units with specific management protocols designed to facilitate and optimize the diagnosis of patients presenting with chest pain in the emergency department. The present document is intended to standardize and facilitate the installation of chest pain units nearby to the emergency department or as an integral part of the emergency department. Recommendations on organizational structure, physical and technical requirements and on disease management are presented. More standardized installation and implementation of chest pain units will enhance the quality of chest pain units and improve the quality of care of our chest pain patients.

Evaluación de un nuevo algoritmo diagnóstico para el síndrome coronario agudo con determinación de troponina T de alta sensibilidad / Evaluation of a New Diagnostic Algorithm for Acute Coronary Syndrome Using High-Sensitivity Troponin T Assay

Introducción El dolor precordial representa el 5% al 10% de las consultas anuales en los departamentos de emergencias; su diagnóstico suele ser dificultoso y a ello se le suma el problema que implican la externación de pacientes con patología coronaria aguda o las internaciones innecesarias. Esto ha llevado al desarrollo de diferentes sistemáticas para la evaluación de estos pacientes. Objetivo Validar en términos de seguridad y tiempos de estadía hospitalaria un nuevo algoritmo incorporado en nuestro centro que incluye la medición de troponina T de alta sensibilidad en pacientes con sospecha de síndrome coronario agudo. Material y métodos Se incluyeron 528 pacientes que consultaron en el servicio de emergencias con sospecha de síndrome coronario agudo y se les realizó el protocolo de unidad de dolor. Se analizaron variables clínicas, de laboratorio y el resultado de las pruebas funcionales efectuadas. En todos los pacientes se efectuó seguimiento a los 30 días. Resultados El 90,7% de los pacientes fueron externados luego de la observación y al seguimiento el 1,25% había presentado un evento cardíaco, representado por angioplastia coronaria e internación por síndrome coronario agudo; la especificidad del algoritmo global para el diagnóstico de síndrome coronario agudo fue del 97% y el valor predictivo negativo fue del 99%. El tiempo de estadía en el servicio de emergencias del total de los pacientes fue de 4,5 ± 2,5 horas. Conclusión El nuevo algoritmo incorporado en nuestro centro con determinación de troponina T de alta sensibilidad en pacientes con sospecha de síndrome coronario agudo demostró que es seguro al evitar la externación de pacientes que cursaban un síndrome coronario agudo y, a la vez, requiere una corta estadía hospitalaria en el servicio de emergencias.(AU)

Introduction Chest pain represents 5 to 10% of annual visits to emergency departments. Its diagnosis is sometimes difficult, with the added problem of inappropriate discharge of patients with acute coronary syndrome or unnecessary hospitalizations. This has led to the development of different algorithms for the evaluation of these patients. Objective The aim of this study was to validate, in terms of safety and length of hospital stay, a novel algorithm incorporated in our center, which includes measurement of high-sensitivity troponin T in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. Methods The study included 528 consecutive patients attending the emergency department with suspected acute coronary syndrome and evaluated according to the chest pain unit protocol. Clinical and laboratory variables and functional tests were analyzed. Follow-up at 30 days was performed in all the patients. Results After observation, 90.7% of the patients were discharged and 1.25% presented a cardiovascular event during follow-up, represented by percutaneous coronary intervention and hospitalization due to acute coronary syndrome. The specificity of the global algorithm for the diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome was 97% with a negative predictive value of 99%. Emergency department length of stay was 4.5 ± 2.5 hours for all the patients. Conclusion The novel algorithm incorporated in our center with measurement of high-sensitivity troponin T in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome has proved to be safe, as it prevents the discharge of patients with acute coronary syndrome and at the same time reduces emergency department length of stay.(AU)

Evaluación de un nuevo algoritmo diagnóstico para el síndrome coronario agudo con determinación de troponina T de alta sensibilidad / Evaluation of a New Diagnostic Algorithm for Acute Coronary Syndrome Using High-Sensitivity Troponin T Assay

Introducción El dolor precordial representa el 5% al 10% de las consultas anuales en los departamentos de emergencias; su diagnóstico suele ser dificultoso y a ello se le suma el problema que implican la externación de pacientes con patología coronaria aguda o las internaciones innecesarias. Esto ha llevado al desarrollo de diferentes sistemáticas para la evaluación de estos pacientes. Objetivo Validar en términos de seguridad y tiempos de estadía hospitalaria un nuevo algoritmo incorporado en nuestro centro que incluye la medición de troponina T de alta sensibilidad en pacientes con sospecha de síndrome coronario agudo. Material y métodos Se incluyeron 528 pacientes que consultaron en el servicio de emergencias con sospecha de síndrome coronario agudo y se les realizó el protocolo de unidad de dolor. Se analizaron variables clínicas, de laboratorio y el resultado de las pruebas funcionales efectuadas. En todos los pacientes se efectuó seguimiento a los 30 días. Resultados El 90,7% de los pacientes fueron externados luego de la observación y al seguimiento el 1,25% había presentado un evento cardíaco, representado por angioplastia coronaria e internación por síndrome coronario agudo; la especificidad del algoritmo global para el diagnóstico de síndrome coronario agudo fue del 97% y el valor predictivo negativo fue del 99%. El tiempo de estadía en el servicio de emergencias del total de los pacientes fue de 4,5 ± 2,5 horas. Conclusión El nuevo algoritmo incorporado en nuestro centro con determinación de troponina T de alta sensibilidad en pacientes con sospecha de síndrome coronario agudo demostró que es seguro al evitar la externación de pacientes que cursaban un síndrome coronario agudo y, a la vez, requiere una corta estadía hospitalaria en el servicio de emergencias.

Introduction Chest pain represents 5 to 10% of annual visits to emergency departments. Its diagnosis is sometimes difficult, with the added problem of inappropriate discharge of patients with acute coronary syndrome or unnecessary hospitalizations. This has led to the development of different algorithms for the evaluation of these patients. Objective The aim of this study was to validate, in terms of safety and length of hospital stay, a novel algorithm incorporated in our center, which includes measurement of high-sensitivity troponin T in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. Methods The study included 528 consecutive patients attending the emergency department with suspected acute coronary syndrome and evaluated according to the chest pain unit protocol. Clinical and laboratory variables and functional tests were analyzed. Follow-up at 30 days was performed in all the patients. Results After observation, 90.7% of the patients were discharged and 1.25% presented a cardiovascular event during follow-up, represented by percutaneous coronary intervention and hospitalization due to acute coronary syndrome. The specificity of the global algorithm for the diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome was 97% with a negative predictive value of 99%. Emergency department length of stay was 4.5 ± 2.5 hours for all the patients. Conclusion The novel algorithm incorporated in our center with measurement of high-sensitivity troponin T in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome has proved to be safe, as it prevents the discharge of patients with acute coronary syndrome and at the same time reduces emergency department length of stay.

Prevalencia de dolor orofacial en la unidad de dolor y cuidados paliativos del Hospital Clínico de la Universidad de Chile / Prevalence of orofacial pain in the pain and paliative care unit, Hospital Clínico de la Universidad de Chile

Introducción: Debido a los variados cuadros clínicos que cursan con dolor orofacial, así como las repercusiones en la calidad de vida y la economía, tanto de los pacientes como de los organismos de atención de salud, hace que estos requieran de un manejo multidisciplinario. Objetivo: Determinar la prevalencia y las características epidemiológicas y clínicas de las consultas por dolor orofacial en la Unidad de Dolor y Cuidados Paliativos del Hospital Clínico de la Universidad de Chile. Material y método: Estudio descriptivo-retrospectivo de los pacientes con diagnóstico de dolor orofacial ingresados a la Unidad en el período comprendido entre enero de 2003 y mayo de 2011. Se obtuvieron características demográficas y clínicas. Resultados: De un total de 1.125 pacientes, encontramos una prevalencia de 10,5 por ciento (118) de pacientes con diagnóstico de dolor orofacial, con una edad promedio de 57,8 +/- 15,2 años. En este grupo un 81 por ciento (95) de los pacientes fueron de sexo femenino. Las agrupaciones de diagnósticos más prevalentes fueron dolor neuropático (55 por ciento), músculo-esquelético (25 por ciento), psicógeno (11 por ciento), dolor neurovascular (5 por ciento); dolor oncológico(3,3 por ciento); dolor facial odontogénico (0,7 por ciento).Conclusiones: La prevalencia de dolor orofacial encontrada es similar a la reportada en la literatura, encontrándose una alta prevalencia de dolor neuropático en nuestro estudio. Es necesario un manejo especializado en este tipo de patología, dada la complejidad tanto en el diagnóstico como en el manejo.

Introduction: Because of the varied clinical conditions that present with orofacial pain, and the impact on quality of life and economy of both the patients and health care agencies, makes these require a multidisciplinary management. Objective: To determine the prevalence, epidemiologic and clinic characteristics of consultation regarding orofacial pain in the Pain and Palliative Care Unit, Hospital Clínico de la Universidad de Chile. Material and Method: Descriptive retrospective study inpatients who have been diagnosed with orofacial pain and treated at the Unit from January 2003 to May 2007. Clinic and demographic characteristics were obtained. Results: From a total of 1125 patients, we found a prevalence of10,5 percent (118) of patients with orofacial pain, with an average age of 57,8 +/- 15,2 years. In this group 81 per cent (95) of the patients were female. The most prevalent diagnosis groups were neuropathic pain (55 percent), musculoskeletal (25 percent) and psychogenic (11 percent).Conclusions: The prevalence of orofacial pain found is similar to that reported in the literature, found a high prevalence of neuropathic pain in this study. Is necessary specialized management of this type of pathology, given the complexity in both the diagnosis and treatment.