Implant-supported, bar-retained maxillary overdenture and Mandibular Implant-supported, metal- acrylic resin, screw-retained, fixed complete denture on an edentulous patient: Case Report.

Most edentulous patients prefer fixed restoration or detachable prostheses over conventional complete dentures. The case report aims to address and discuss the clinical and laboratory steps of implant-supported, bar-retained maxillary overdenture and mandibular implant-supported, metal-acrylic resin, screw-retained, fixed complete denture. Impression techniques and laboratory steps are discussed and demonstrated to minimize the post-fabrication or insertion complication. It lets you achieve the passive fit of the prosthesis that maintains the osseointegration by reducing stress on implants and the surrounding bone.

Estudio in vitro del ajuste de supraestructuras pasivadas sobre implantes múltiples / In vitro study of the adjustment of passivated suprastructures on multiple implants

Resumen Objetivo Comparar dos procedimientos de soldadura convencionales empleando una aleación de Cr-Co, para conectar barras coladas seccionadas a ser fijadas sobre implantes. Materiales y métodos A partir de un modelo maestro que representa un maxilar desdentado con cuatro implantes, se confeccionaron veinte (n=20) probetas seccionadas en tres partes. Se conformaron dos grupos, cada uno con diez (n=10) ejemplares. Una vez acondicionadas, fueron atornilladas al modelo maestro. Su desajuste inicial se analizó utilizando una lupa estereoscópica, con una cámara incorporada y un software. Las partes fueron soldadas empleando un procedimiento diferente para cada grupo. Las correspondientes al Grupo I se invistieron en un block refractario a base de sílico-fosfato. Las del Grupo II se montaron en una estructura metálica Clever Spider. El desajuste fue mensurado y los resultados procesados estadísticamente. El nivel de significación fue establecido en p<0,05. Resultados El Grupo I tuvo un desajuste inicial de 97,30±13,81μm y el Grupo II de 98,53±11,24μm. Luego de la soldadura, el Grupo I registró 98,53±17,17μm, 1,23μm mayor respecto al inicial. En el Grupo II se observó 103,13±17,61μm, 4,60μm por encima del original. Se analizaron mediante prueba t de Student; en ambos casos el resultado fue de p>0,05. Al comparar entre sí los grupos I y II, por medio de la prueba t y de comprobación no paramétrica de Mann-Whitney, se observaron diferencias no significativas, p=0,41 y p=0,38 respectivamente. Conclusiones Bajo las condiciones de este estudio, se observó que los dos métodos de soldadura analizados fueron confiables para unir supraestructurasos metálicas sin que se afecte su ajuste final.

Abstract Aim Compare two conventional welding procedures using a Cr-Co alloy, to connect sectioned cast bars to be fixed on implants. Materials and methods From a master model representing a toothless jaw with four implants, twenty (n=20) specimens sectioned into three parts were made. Two groups were formed, each with ten (n=10) specimens. Once conditioned, they were screwed to the master model. Its initial mismatch was analyzed using a stereoscopic magnifier, with a built-in camera and a software. The parts were welded using a different procedure for each group. Those corresponding to Group I were invested in a refractory block based on silyl-phosphate. Those of Group II were mounted on a Clever Spider metal structure. The mismatch was measured, and the results processed statistically. The level of significance was established at p<0.05. Results Group I had an initial mismatch of 97.30 ±13.81μm, and Group II of 98.53±11.24μm. After welding, Group I registered 98.53±17.17μm, 1.23μm higher than the initial one. In Group II, 103.13±17.61μm was observed, 4.60μm above the original. They were analyzed using Student's t test; in both cases the result was p>0.05. When comparing groups I and II, using the t-test and the Mann-Whitney nonparametric verification, non-significant differences were observed, p=0.41 and p=0.38 respectively. Conclusions Under the conditions of this study, it was observed that the two welding methods analyzed were reliable for joining metallic superstructures without affecting their final fit.

Prevalencia de cristales de colesterol en granulomas perirradiculares de origen endodóntico / Prevalence of cholesterol crystals in periradicular granulomas of endodontic origin

Resumen Objetivo Comparar dos procedimientos de soldadura convencionales empleando una aleación de Cr-Co, para conectar barras coladas seccionadas a ser fijadas sobre implantes. Materiales y métodos A partir de un modelo maestro que representa un maxilar desdentado con cuatro implantes, se confeccionaron veinte (n=20) probetas seccionadas en tres partes. Se conformaron dos grupos, cada uno con diez (n=10) ejemplares. Una vez acondicionadas, fueron atornilladas al modelo maestro. Su desajuste inicial se analizó utilizando una lupa estereoscópica, con una cámara incorporada y un software. Las partes fueron soldadas empleando un procedimiento diferente para cada grupo. Las correspondientes al Grupo I se invistieron en un block refractario a base de sílico-fosfato. Las del Grupo II se montaron en una estructura metálica Clever Spider. El desajuste fue mensurado y los resultados procesados estadísticamente. El nivel de significación fue establecido en p<0,05. Resultados El Grupo I tuvo un desajuste inicial de 97,30±13,81μm y el Grupo II de 98,53±11,24μm. Luego de la soldadura, el Grupo I registró 98,53±17,17μm, 1,23μm mayor respecto al inicial. En el Grupo II se observó 103,13±17,61μm, 4,60μm por encima del original. Se analizaron mediante prueba t de Student; en ambos casos el resultado fue de p>0,05. Al comparar entre sí los grupos I y II, por medio de la prueba t y de comprobación no paramétrica de Mann-Whitney, se observaron diferencias no significativas, p=0,41 y p=0,38 respectivamente. Conclusiones Bajo las condiciones de este estudio, se observó que los dos métodos de soldadura analizados fueron confiables para unir supraestructurasos metálicas sin que se afecte su ajuste final.

Abstract Aim Compare two conventional welding procedures using a Cr-Co alloy, to connect sectioned cast bars to be fixed on implants. Materials and methods From a master model representing a toothless jaw with four implants, twenty (n=20) specimens sectioned into three parts were made. Two groups were formed, each with ten (n=10) specimens. Once conditioned, they were screwed to the master model. Its initial mismatch was analyzed using a stereoscopic magnifier, with a built-in camera and a software. The parts were welded using a different procedure for each group. Those corresponding to Group I were invested in a refractory block based on silyl-phosphate. Those of Group II were mounted on a Clever Spider metal structure. The mismatch was measured, and the results processed statistically. The level of significance was established at p<0.05. Results Group I had an initial mismatch of 97.30 ±13.81μm, and Group II of 98.53±11.24μm. After welding, Group I registered 98.53±17.17μm, 1.23μm higher than the initial one. In Group II, 103.13±17.61μm was observed, 4.60μm above the original. They were analyzed using Student's t test; in both cases the result was p>0.05. When comparing groups I and II, using the t-test and the Mann-Whitney nonparametric verification, non-significant differences were observed, p=0.41 and p=0.38 respectively. Conclusions Under the conditions of this study, it was observed that the two welding methods analyzed were reliable for joining metallic superstructures without affecting their final fit.

Estudio in vitro del ajuste de supraestructuras pasivadas sobre implantes múltiples / In vitro study of the adjustment of passivated suprastructures on multiple implants

Objetivo: Comparar dos procedimientos de soldadura convencionales empleando una aleación de Cr-Co, para co- nectar barras coladas seccionadas a ser fijadas sobre implantes. Materiales y métodos: A partir de un modelo maes- tro que representa un maxilar desdentado con cuatro implan- tes, se confeccionaron veinte (n=20) probetas seccionadas en tres partes. Se conformaron dos grupos, cada uno con diez (n=10) ejemplares. Una vez acondicionadas, fueron atornilla- das al modelo maestro. Su desajuste inicial se analizó utili- zando una lupa estereoscópica, con una cámara incorporada y un software. Las partes fueron soldadas empleando un pro- cedimiento diferente para cada grupo. Las correspondientes al Grupo I se invistieron en un block refractario a base de sílico-fosfato. Las del Grupo II se montaron en una estructu- ra metálica Clever Spider. El desajuste fue mensurado y los resultados procesados estadísticamente. El nivel de significa- ción fue establecido en p<0,05. Resultados: El Grupo I tuvo un desajuste inicial de 97,30±13,81µm y el Grupo II de 98,53±11,24µm. Luego de la soldadura, el Grupo I registró 98,53±17,17µm, 1,23µm mayor respecto al inicial. En el Grupo II se observó 103,13±17,61µm, 4,60µm por encima del original. Se analizaron mediante prue- ba t de Student; en ambos casos el resultado fue de p>0,05. Al comparar entre sí los grupos I y II, por medio de la prueba t y de comprobación no paramétrica de Mann-Whitney, se ob- servaron diferencias no significativas, p=0,41 y p=0,38 res- pectivamente (AU)

Aim: Compare two conventional welding procedures us- ing a Cr-Co alloy, to connect sectioned cast bars to be fixed on implants. Materials and methods: From a master model representing a toothless jaw with four implants, twenty (n=20) specimens sectioned into three parts were made. Two groups were formed, each with ten (n=10) specimens. Once conditioned, they were screwed to the master mod- el. Its initial mismatch was analyzed using a stereoscop- ic magnifier, with a built-in camera and a software. The parts were welded using a different procedure for each group. Those corresponding to Group I were invested in a refractory block based on silyl-phosphate. Those of Group II were mounted on a Clever Spider metal structure. The mismatch was measured, and the results processed statisti- cally. The level of significance was established at p<0.05. Results: Group I had an initial mismatch of 97.30 ±13.81µm, and Group II of 98.53±11.24µm. After welding, Group I registered 98.53±17.17µm, 1.23µm higher than the initial one. In Group II, 103.13±17.61µm was observed, 4.60µm above the original. They were analyzed using Stu- dent's t test; in both cases the result was p>0.05. When com- paring groups I and II, using the t-test and the Mann-Whitney nonparametric verification, non-significant differences were observed, p=0.41 and p=0.38 respectively. Conclusions: Under the conditions of this study, it was ob- served that the two welding methods analyzed were reliable for joining metallic superstructures without affecting their final fit (AU)

Analysis of implant-supported cantilever fixed partial denture: An in vitro comparative study on vertical misfit, stress distribution, and cantilever fracture strength.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the vertical misfit, stress distribution around dental implants, and cantilever fracture strength of 3-unit implant-supported cantilever fixed partial dentures (FPDs) using frameworks made from different materials and manufacturing techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty FPDs were fabricated and divided into 5 groups (n = 8) based on the framework material used: LAS Co-Cr (Conventional casting-laser welding); TIG Co-Cr (Conventional casting -TIG welding); OP Co-Cr (Conventional casting-one-piece); CAD Co-Cr (CAD-CAM); and CAD Zr (CAD-CAM ZrO2 ). The vertical misfit was evaluated before porcelain application (T1) and before (T2), and after thermomechanical cycling (T3) by stereomicroscopy. Cantilever fracture strength was tested with a 50 kN (5000 kgf) load cell at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Qualitative and quantitative photoelastic analysis was performed to evaluate stress distribution at seven specific points in five FPDs (n = 1/group) subjected to occlusal loading. RESULTS: Only the molar showed interaction among the three factors (G × S × T; F(20.932) = 1.630; p = 0.044). Thermomechanical cycling (T2 vs. T3) had a significant effect on intra-group vertical misfit in molar, especially in LAS Co-Cr (Δ = 5.87; p = 0.018) and OP Co-Cr (Δ = 5.39; p = 0.007), with no significant effect in premolar (p > 0.05). Ceramic application combined with thermomechanical cycling (T1 vs. T3) caused a significant intra-group increase in vertical misfit in all groups, both in the molar and premolar (p < 0.05). OP Co-Cr was associated with greater vertical misfit and stress concentration. Frameworks manufactured by the CAD-CAM system exhibited lower vertical misfit and better stress distribution. FPDs with metal frameworks (>410.83 ± 72.26 N) showed significantly higher fracture strength (p < 0.05) than zirconia (277.47 ± 39.10 N), and the first signs of ceramic veneering fracture were observed around 900 N. CONCLUSIONS: FPDs with frameworks manufactured using a CAD-CAM system appear to be associated with lower vertical misfit and better stress distribution, although the section of the frameworks followed by welding may be a viable alternative. In addition, metal frameworks exhibit high fracture strength.

Accuracy of the Different Materials Used to Fabricate a Verification Jig of Implant-Supported Fixed Complete Dental Prostheses: An In Vitro Study.

Introduction The passive fit of a full arch implant-supported prosthesis is one of the elements influencing implant success. Achieving the passive fit of a prosthesis requires verification of the master cast before the fabrication of the framework. A verification jig is a common way to verify the implant master cast and ensure the accuracy of the implant impression and produced cast. Different materials can be used to fabricate verification jigs, and each material exhibits different dimensional changes. In this study, we compared the accuracies of verification jig materials by 3D assessment. Materials and methods A type IV stone cast with four implant analogs was constructed and used as a control. Verification jigs were constructed from five different materials, and test casts were made from these jigs and poured using low expansion stone (type IV), resulting in five groups (n=5). All test casts and the control cast were scanned using a lab scanner. The scans of test casts were superimposed on that of the control cast for 3D accuracy assessment. The distortion of the implant analogs was recorded using Geomagic Design X and Geomagic Control X software (3D Systems, Rock Hill, South Carolina, USA). Statistical differences in the 3D accuracies between the five groups were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Result The photopolymerizable resin group had a mean value of 23.16 (± 0.88) µm; the composite group had a mean value of 46.72 (± 2.122) µm; the GC pattern group had a mean of 23.51 (± 0.736) µm; the type III stone group had a mean of 19.84 (± 1.017) µm; the type IV stone group had a mean of 18.72 (± 0.819) µm. The Kruskal-Wallis test indicated that there were statistically significant differences between groups 2 (composite), 4 (type III stone), and 5 (type IV stone).  Conclusion The most accurate cast was produced by type IV stone, followed by type III stone, photopolymerizable resin, GC pattern, and composite in order of decreasing accuracy. Within the limitations of the study, a material with low distortion and high accuracy is recommended when fabricating verification jigs of implant-supported complete dental prostheses.

Merging intraoral scans and CBCT: a novel technique for improving the accuracy of 3D digital models for implant-supported complete-arch fixed dental prostheses.

AIM: A technique for merging digital intraoral and CBCT scans for implant-supported complete-arch fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) is described. The aim is to improve the dimensional accuracy of intraoral scans in edentulous arches. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Two files are recorded: an intraoral scan and a CBCT scan, both obtained with scan bodies connected to the implants in the same position. The intraoral scan is then divided into several fragments and realigned, taking as reference the position of the implants recorded in the CBCT file. RESULTS: An improved intraoral digital model with corrected implant positions appropriate for complete-arch implant FDPs is generated. CONCLUSION: The methodology proposed can minimize possible intraoral scanning error and deliver more reliable digital impressions for implant-supported complete-arch FDPs.

[The significance and evaluation of precise passive fit of implant restorations, and the application of intraoral welding technology].

Passive fit is a key prerequisite for successful implant-supported restorations, especially for full-arch implant-supported fixed restoration. The precise passive fit comes from the fine control of the entire manufacturing process of resorations. Intraoral welding directly connects the metal framework and the upper abutment in the mouth, which can ensure precise and stable passive fit. This article will explain the definition, necessity, influencing factors and clinical control methods of passive fit, in order to provide guidance for achieving precise passive fit in implant-supported full-arch prostheses.

Continuous Scan Strategy (CSS): A Novel Technique to Improve the Accuracy of Intraoral Digital Impressions.

PURPOSE: To present the results obtained with the "Continuous Scan Strategy" (CSS), a direct intraoral scanning technique based on the connection of the implant scan bodies (SBs) with thermoplastic resin. METHODS: 40 patients were restored with 45 long-span monolithic implant-supported zirconia restorations (10 partial prostheses [PP] and 35 full arches [FA]) fabricated via a full-digital workflow after the capture of an intraoral impression (Trios3®) using the CSS technique. The primary outcomes were the marginal adaptation and passive fit of the superstructures, checked at T0 (intraoral try-in of polyurethane or metal replica of the final prosthesis) and T1 (delivery of the final zirconia restoration). The secondary outcomes, registered at T2 (2 years after the delivery of the final prosthesis), were implant survival, prosthetic success, and complications. A throughout statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: At T0, 40/45 replicas demonstrated a perfect passive fit and adaptation. At T1, one prosthesis had fractured, and at T2, an additional prosthesis had fractured and one had chipped. The implant survival rate was 100%. The prosthetic success was 93.3%. CONCLUSIONS: CSS seems to represent a viable option for capturing accurate intraoral digital impressions for the fabrication of precise long-span implant-supported restorations.

Effect of repetitive firing on passive fit of metal substructure produced by the laser sintering in implant-supported fixed prosthesis.

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to investigate the passive fit of metal substructure after repetitive firing processes in implant-supposed prosthesis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five implants (4 mm diameter and 10 mm length) were placed into the resin-based mandibular model and 1-piece of screw-retained metal substructure was produced with the direct metal laser sintering (DMSL) method using Co-Cr compound (n = 10). The distance between the marked points on the multiunit supports and the marginal end of the substructure was measured using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) at each stage (metal, opaque, dentin, and glaze). 15 measurements were taken from each prosthesis, and 150 measurements from 10 samples were obtained. In total, 600 measurements were carried out at 4 stages. One-way ANOVA test was used for statistical evaluation of the data. RESULTS: When the obtained marginal range values were examined, differences between groups were found to be statistically significant (P<.001). The lowest values were found in the metal stage (172.4 ± 76.5 µm) and the highest values (238.03 ± 118.92 µm) were determined after glaze application. When the interval values for groups are compared with pairs, the differences between metal with dentin, metal with glaze, opaque with dentin, opaque with glaze, and dentin with glaze were found to be significant (P<.05), whereas the difference between opaque with metal was found to be insignificant (P=.992). CONCLUSION: Passive fit of 1-piece designed implant-retained fixed prosthesis that is supported by multiple implants is negatively affected by repetitive firing processes.

Solid index impression protocol: a hybrid workflow for high accuracy and passive fit of full-arch implant-supported restorations.

AIM: The purpose of this article is to present the preliminary clinical results obtained with a novel hybrid digital-analog technique, the solid index impression protocol (SIIP), which uses a solid index to capture accurate impressions of multiple implants for the fabrication of implant-supported fixed full arches (FFAs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This pilot study was based on five patients, each treated with a FFA supported by four implants. Three months after implant placement, impressions were taken for all patients with an intraoral scanner (IOS) (direct digital impression) and with the SIIP, using a custom tray consisting of four hollow cylinders connected with a bar. This index was linked to the implant transfers and transferred to the laboratory, and the definitive FFAs were fabricated based on it. The outcomes of the study were the passive fit of implant superstructures and the accuracy of the models generated by the SIIP, inspected using a coordinate measuring machine (CMM) and reverse engineering software, and compared with the accuracy of direct digital impressions. RESULTS: Excellent clinical precision and passive fit were obtained in all five implant-supported FFAs fabricated with the SIIP. One year after delivery, all FFAs were functional without any complication. Differences in accuracy were found between the SIIP and direct intraoral scanning. CONCLUSIONS: The SIIP seems to represent a viable option for capturing accurate impressions for the fabrication of clinically precise implant-supported FFAs with a hybrid digital-analog workflow. Further studies are needed to confirm these results.

Marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM frameworks in multiple implant-supported restorations: Scanning and milling error analysis.

BACKGROUND: Despite computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology improving prosthesis fit, errors inherent to digital workflow still exist. PURPOSE: To measure scanning/milling errors, and identify factors influencing marginal (MD) and internal discrepancy (ID). MATERIALS AND METHODS: After scanning, 22 conical abutments in 5 master casts, 6 suprastructures with more than 2 implants (3, 4, and 6) were CAD designed. Angular deviation and errors in the vertical/horizontal planes were analyzed using a coordinate measuring machine (CMM). CAD suprastructures were milled and MD/ID evaluated with micro-computed tomography (CT) and optic microscopy (OM) at one screw test (OST) and final fit test (FFT). RESULTS: Mean scanning errors, at the vertical/horizontal planes, and angulation error were 3 µm ± 13, 44 µm ± 34, 0.3° ± 0.2°, respectively. Angulation errors nearly double in structures >3 abutments (0.26°vs 0.4°). OM MD in FFT/OST was 57.7 µm ± 13.9/100.7 µm ± 34.6, respectively. Micro-CT FFT-MD was 38.9 µm ± 12.8. Lineal/perimetral ID was 49.6 µm ± 11.9 and 108.2° ± 41.8, respectively. Structures >3-implants were 2.3 times more likely to present higher MD (CI95%:0.4-13.6). Nearly all the internal horizontal gap was due to scanning errors (44 of 49.6 µm). Horizontal scanning errors were three times more likely to present greater ID (CI95%:0.5-17.4). CONCLUSION: Horizontal plane scanning errors are greater than vertical errors. Scanning angulation/milling errors are higher for suprastructures>3implants. Scanning/milling errors are associated with ID/MD, respectively, leading to micro-gap formation. A CMM reduces scanning errors in >3-implant-frameworks before milling the final piece.

[Effect of materials and superstructure designs on the passive fit of implant-supported fixed prostheses].

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the passive fits of implant-supported cement-retained computer aided design/computer aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) bridges fabricated with different implant superstructure designs from zirconia and titanium. METHODS: A total of 32 cubic clods with the same dimensions and with elastic modulus similar to that of mandibles were used. Each clod received two one-stage implants to simulate a partially edentulous jaw that was missing teeth between the lower left second premolar and second molar. Four linear strain gauges were bonded on the region surrounding each implant on the mesial, buccal, distal, and lingual aspects. A total of 32 identical frameworks were fabricated through CAD/CAM after scanning. The frameworks were allocated into four different groups (n=8) in accordance with material types and superstructure designs. Group A included zirconia ceramic implant-supported fixed prostheses with regular marginal designs. Group B comprised zirconia ceramic implant-supported fixed prostheses with full circumferential zirconia-collar marginal designs. Group C consisted of titanium ceramic implant-supported fixed prostheses with regular marginal designs. Group D included titanium ceramic implant-supported fixed prostheses with full circumferential titanium-collar marginal designs. Strain development before and after ceramic veneering was recorded during cement setting. Data were statistically analyzed by using SPSS software. RESULTS: Before ceramic veneering, material types affected the strains of prostheses, and zirconia frameworks showed lower strain than other frameworks (P<0.01). Designs affected the strains of prostheses, and frameworks with full collar marginal design showed lower strain than other frameworks (P<0.01). These two factors showed interactions (P<0.01). The strain of decorative porcelain increased after sintering. The two groups of different materials did not significantly differ (P>0.05). Nevertheless, the full circumferential collar marginal design reduced discrepancies among groups (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The passive fits of zirconia prostheses were better than those of titanium-based porcelain-fused-to-metal restorations. The full circumferential collar marginal design can help reduce fit inaccuracy, as well as the adverse effects of ceramic veneering.

Effect of materials and superstructure designs on the passive fit of implant-supported fixed prostheses / 华西口腔医学杂志

OBJECTIVE@#This study aimed to compare the passive fits of implant-supported cement-retained computer aided design/computer aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) bridges fabricated with different implant superstructure designs from zirconia and titanium.@*METHODS@#A total of 32 cubic clods with the same dimensions and with elastic modulus similar to that of mandibles were used. Each clod received two one-stage implants to simulate a partially edentulous jaw that was missing teeth between the lower left second premolar and second molar. Four linear strain gauges were bonded on the region surrounding each implant on the mesial, buccal, distal, and lingual aspects. A total of 32 identical frameworks were fabricated through CAD/CAM after scanning. The frameworks were allocated into four different groups (n=8) in accordance with material types and superstructure designs. Group A included zirconia ceramic implant-supported fixed prostheses with regular marginal designs. Group B comprised zirconia ceramic implant-supported fixed prostheses with full circumferential zirconia-collar marginal designs. Group C consisted of titanium ceramic implant-supported fixed prostheses with regular marginal designs. Group D included titanium ceramic implant-supported fixed prostheses with full circumferential titanium-collar marginal designs. Strain development before and after ceramic veneering was recorded during cement setting. Data were statistically analyzed by using SPSS software.@*RESULTS@#Before ceramic veneering, material types affected the strains of prostheses, and zirconia frameworks showed lower strain than other frameworks (P0.05). Nevertheless, the full circumferential collar marginal design reduced discrepancies among groups (P<0.01).@*CONCLUSIONS@#The passive fits of zirconia prostheses were better than those of titanium-based porcelain-fused-to-metal restorations. The full circumferential collar marginal design can help reduce fit inaccuracy, as well as the adverse effects of ceramic veneering.

Accuracy of multi-unit implant impression: traditional techniques versus a digital procedure.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of different impression techniques on multiple implants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A master cast simulating a jaw with four implants was used. Eight impression techniques were tested: open tray-polyether#1, open tray plus splint of impression copings with acrylic resin-polyether#1, closed tray-polyether#1, open tray-polyether#2, open tray-splint-polyether#2, closed tray-polyether#2, open tray-impression plaster, and digital impression (DI). Five impressions of the master cast were taken with each traditional impression (TI) technique, pouring 35 sample casts. Three different clinicians took 5 DI each (n = 15). A three-dimensional coordinate measurement machine (CMM) was used to measure implant angulation and inter-implant distances on TI casts. TI data and DI Standard Tessellation Language datasets were compared with the master cast. The best and the worst impressions made with TI and DI were selected to fabricate four milled titanium frameworks. Passive fit was evaluated through Sheffield test, screwing each framework on the master cast. Gaps between framework-implant analogs were measured through a stereomicroscope (×40 magnification). RESULTS: Statistically significant differences in accuracy were found comparing the different impression techniques by CMM (p < 0.01). DI performed the best, while TI techniques revealed a greater variability in the results. Sheffield test revealed a mean gap of 0.022 ± 0.023 mm (the best TI), 0.063 ± 0.059 mm (the worst TI), 0.015 ± 0.011 mm (the best DI), and 0.019 ± 0.015 mm (the worst DI). CONCLUSIONS: Within the limits of this in vitro study, the digital impression showed better accuracy compared to conventional impressioning. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The digital impression might offer a viable alternative to traditional impressions for fabrication of full-arch implant-supported prostheses with satisfactory passive fit.

Effect of joining the sectioned implant-supported prosthesis on the peri-implant strain generated in simulated mandibular model.

AIM: The aim of this study is to evaluate the strain developed in simulated mandibular model before and after the joining of an implant-supported screw-retained prosthesis by different joining techniques, namely, arc welding, laser welding, and soldering. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A specimen simulating a mandibular edentulous ridge was fabricated in heat-cured acrylic resin. 4-mm holes were drilled in the following tooth positions; 36, 33, 43, 46. Implant analogs were placed in the holes. University of California, Los Angeles, abutment was attached to the implant fixture. Eight strain gauges were attached to the acrylic resin model. Six similar models were made. Implant-supported screw-retained fixed prosthesis was fabricated in nickel-chromium alloy. A load of 400 N was applied on the prosthesis using universal testing machine. Resultant strain was measured in each strain gauge. All the prostheses were sectioned at the area between 36 and 33, 33 and 43, and 43 and 46 using 35 micrometer carborundum disc, and strain was measured in each strain gauge after applying a load of 400 N on the prosthesis. Specimens were joined by arc welding, soldering, and laser welding. After joining, a load of 400 N was applied on each prosthesis and the resultant strain was measured in each strain gauge. RESULTS: Highest mean strain values were recorded before sectioning of the prostheses (889.9 microstrains). Lowest mean strain values were recorded after sectioning the prosthesis and before reuniting it (225.0 microstrains). CONCLUSIONS: Sectioning and reuniting the long-span implant prosthesis was found to be a significant factor in influencing the peri-implant strain.

Zinc phosphate as a definitive cement for implant-supported crowns and fixed dentures.

Implant-supported dental prostheses can be retained by a screw or cement. Implant-supported fixed partial dentures have a passive fit. A passive fit means there is an internal gap between the abutment surface and the intaglio of the retainer to insure that there is no lateral pressure on the supporting implants or friction upon seating of the prosthesis. This gap is filled with cement for retention of the prosthesis. Any lateral pressure may cause marginal bone loss or periimplantitis. Also, there is usually a microscopic gap at the margin of a crown retainer that exposes the cement to oral fluids. The solubility of zinc phosphate (ZOP) cement is a definite liability due to the risk for cement dissolution. In fixed prostheses, the dissolution of the cement of one or more retainers would cause a transfer of the occlusal load to the retained unit(s). The resulting rotation and lifting of the cement-retained implants from occlusal and parafunctional loads could cause loss of osseointegration of the abutment-retained implant(s). ZOP cement may not be indicated for implant-supported fixed partial dentures or splints. Cement dissolution in single unit probably only involves re-cementation, if the patient does not swallow or aspirate the crown.

Adjacent Dental Implants Classification Based on Restorative Design.

There is controversy in the literature regarding the indicated retentive mechanism for implant-supported crowns. When adjacent implants are restored, the restoration can be screw retained, cement retained, or a combination of cement and screw retained. Adjacent implant-supported crowns can be restored as individual implant supported crowns or can be splinted. A classification system is proposed when adjacent implants are restored. The classification system describes currently available options to restore adjacent implants. Six types of prosthetic design options are proposed as Class I through Class VI. In Class I design, individual cement-retained crowns are made. In Class II, individual screw-retained crowns are fabricated. Class III involves fabrication of individual screw-retrievable/cement-retained crowns. Class IV prosthetic design involves splinted cement-retained implant crowns. Class V prosthetic design involves splinted screw-retained crowns, and Class VI involves splinted screw-retrievable/cement-retained implant supported crowns.

Accuracy and mechanical performance of passivated and conventional fabricated 3-unit fixed dental prosthesis on multi-unit abutments.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the fit and mechanical stability of conventional versus passive fitting 3-unit fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) screw-retained on implants. METHODS: Twenty acrylic models, each with two embedded implants, were fabricated and functioned as patient-models. Impressions were taken and 20 all-ceramic FDPs were pre-fabricated on the plaster casts. Respectively 10 FDPs were fixed on the plaster casts (group 1) and on the patient-models for passive fitting (group 2). The fit of each FDP was checked on the patient-model by means of visual control (grades 1-10) and microscopic examination. Furthermore, specimens were artificially aged for possible prosthodontic failures, followed by a fracture strength test. RESULTS: Group 2 [1.4 (±0.3)] showed significantly (p<0.001) better results in the visual examination of the marginal fit compared to group 1 [6.3 (±2.4)]. The microscopic marginal misfit was 160µm (±80µm) at the abutment margin and 150µm (±80µm) at the axial wall of the abutment for group 1, respectively, 0µm and 0µm up to 17µm for group 2 (p<0.001). No failure of the FDPs could be observed during artificial aging in both groups. The fracture load showed no significant difference (p=0.60) between group 1 [2583N (±664N)] and group 2 [2465N (±238N)]. CONCLUSIONS: Visual and microscopic examination detected huge differences in marginal fit between groups 1 and 2. However, no statistically verifiable differences could be detected in long-term stability of implant-supported FDPs irrespective of the fit.

Strain gauge analysis of implant-supported, screw-retained metal frameworks: Comparison between different manufacturing technologies.

Over the past decades, the technological development in the medical field, coupled with the ongoing scientific research, has led to the development and improvement of dental prostheses supported by screw-retained metal frameworks. A key point in the manufacture of the framework is the achievement of a passive fit, intended as the capability of an implant-supported reconstruction to transmit minimum strain to implant components as well as to the surrounding bone, when subject to any load. The fitting of four different kinds of screw-retained metal frameworks was tested in this article. They differ both in materials and manufacturing process: two frameworks are made by casting, one framework is made by computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing and one framework is made by electric resistance spot welding (WeldONE, DENTSPLY Implants Manufacturing GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). The passivity of the frameworks was evaluated on the entire system, composed of a resin master cast, the implant analogues embedded in the cast and the frameworks. Strains were recorded by means of an electrical strain gauge connected to a control unit for strain gauge measurements. The experimental tests were carried out in the laboratories of the Department of INdustrial engineering at the University of Bologna. The results of the test campaigns, which compared three samples for each technological process, showed that no significant differences exist between the four framework types. In particular, the frameworks made by the resistance welding approach led to a mechanical response that is well comparable to that of the other tested frameworks.