Outcomes Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Patellar Tendon vs Hamstring Autografts: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials with a Mean Follow-up of 15 Years.

Background: The two most common surgical treatment modalities for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL), patellar tendon (PT) and hamstring tendon (HS) autografts, have been shown to have outcomes that are both similar and favorable; however, many of these are short or intermediate-term. The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a minimum 10-year follow-up data to compare the long-term outcomes of ACL reconstructions performed using PT and HS autografts. Methods: This systematic review followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. A search of three databases (PubMed, Cochrane and EMBASE) was performed to identify RCTs with a minimum of 10-year follow-up that compared clinical and/or functional outcomes between PT and HS autografts. Results: Four RCTs with a total of 299 patients were included in the study. The mean follow-up ranged from 10.2 to 17 years (mean, 14.79 years). No significant differences in knee laxity or clinical outcome scores were demonstrated in any of the studies. One study found that PT autografts were significantly more likely to have osteoarthritis identified by radiographic findings. Two studies found that patients with PT autografts reported increase kneeling pain, while none of the four studies reported a difference in anterior knee pain. There were no significant differences in graft failure rates. Conclusion: This review demonstrates no long-term difference in clinical or functional outcomes between PT and HS autografts. However, radiographic and subjective outcomes indicate that patients with PT autografts may experience greater kneeling pain and osteoarthritis. Therefore, orthopaedic surgeons should consider patient-centric factors when discussing graft options with patients.

Posterior Tibial Slope in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Patellar Tendon Autograft: Analysis of Subsequent ACL Graft Tear or Contralateral ACL Tear.

BACKGROUND: Reports on greater posterior tibial slope (PTS) and its relationship to subsequent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury show conflicting results; it has not been studied much in patients after ACL reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft (PTG). HYPOTHESIS: Patients who suffered a subsequent ACL injury would have a larger PTS than patients who did not suffer a subsequent injury after primary or revision ACL reconstruction. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Patients received primary (n = 2439) or revision (n = 324) ACL reconstruction with PTG and were followed prospectively to determine the rate of graft tear and contralateral ACL tear. The PTS was measured preoperatively on digital lateral view radiographs. Intersecting lines were drawn along the medial tibial plateau and posterior tibia; the value of the acute angle at the lines' intersection was then subtracted from 90° to obtain the PTS. This procedure was completed by a clinical assistant with an intrarater reliability of 0.89. Chi-square analysis and t tests were used to determine the differences between rate of tears and measurements between groups. A threshold of PTS ≥10° was used for analysis. RESULTS: The mean follow-up time was 11.6 ± 4.0 years. After primary surgery, the mean PTS in patients with graft tears was 5.4°± 3.1° versus 4.8°± 2.9° for patients without a tear (P = .041). The mean PTS was 4.9°± 3.4° for patients with contralateral tears (not statistically significantly different than the no-tear group; P = .80). Furthermore, patients with primary reconstruction with PTS ≥10° had a statistically significantly higher rate of graft tear (9.7%) than patients with PTS ≤9° (4.8%) (P = .003), but not a higher rate of contralateral tear. Among patients undergoing revision surgery, there were no statistically significant differences between the graft tear, contralateral tear, and no-tear groups with relation to PTS ≥10°. CONCLUSION: After primary ACL reconstruction, patients with PTS >10° had a higher rate of subsequent graft tear but not a higher rate of contralateral tear. With revision surgery, there was no significant association between PTS and the rate of subsequent tear. Therefore, caution should be exercised when considering more radical interventions, such as osteotomy, to prevent retear in patients with high PTS.

Graft failure is more frequent after hamstring than patellar tendon autograft.

PURPOSE: The risk of graft failure after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions with hamstring or patellar tendon was evaluated in a French population of athletes. METHODS: Athletes who had undergone ACL autograft reconstruction and who received rehabilitation care at the European Center for Sports Rehabilitation (CERS; Capbreton, France) were screened for this prospective cohort study. Eligibility criteria included a simple hamstring autograft or patellar tendon autograft surgical technique. Patients were contacted by phone to participate in follow-up during the second year after surgery. The primary endpoint was the graft failure frequency, evaluated with a multivariate logistic model with adjustment for baseline patient characteristics. The secondary endpoint was time to graft failure, analyzed by an adjusted Cox model. RESULTS: A total of 2424 athletes were included after having a hamstring autograft (semitendinosus and gracilis) or a patellar tendon autograft between 2011 and 2014. Of the 988 athletes who responded to a follow-up phone call (40.7% response rate), 33 were excluded for new contralateral ACL rupture (3.3%), with 955 included for analysis (713 hamstring autografts; 242 patellar-tendon autografts). There were no significant differences between the baseline characteristics of the patients analyzed and the population which did not respond to the questionnaire. A significant difference in the frequency of graft failure was seen, 6.5% for hamstring autografts vs 2.1% for patellar-tendon autografts [adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 3.64, 95% CI (1.55; 10.67); p = 0.007]. Mean time to graft failure was 10.7 vs 17.4 months for hamstring and patellar-tendon autografts respectively [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 3.50, 95% CI (1.53; 10.11); p = 0.008]. Age less than 25 years significantly increased the frequency of graft failure [adjusted OR = 3.85 (1.89; 8.72); p < 0.001]. The rate of patients returning to competitive sport after the first graft was not significantly different for the two techniques: 70.8% for hamstring and 77.8% for patellar tendon [adjusted OR = 0.718; 95% CI (0.50; 1.02)]. CONCLUSIONS: Graft failure is significantly more frequent after hamstring than patellar tendon autografts in a French population, despite similar rates of return to competition. Athletes aged less than 25 years have a higher risk of failure than those aged ≥ 25 years. Our results are in accordance with recent Scandinavian studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Can we predict the size of frequently used autografts in ACL reconstruction?

PURPOSE: This study presents a method to measure the size of quadriceps, patellar tendon and hamstring autografts using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: Sixty-two subjects with a mean age of 25 ± 10 years who underwent ACL surgery between 2011 and 2014 were included. Patient anthropometric data were recorded for all subjects. During surgery, the respective autograft was harvested and measured using commercially available graft sizers. MRI measurements were performed by two raters, who were blinded to the intra-operative measurements. RESULTS: The inter- and intra-rater reliability was ≥0.8 for all MRI measurements. The intra-class correlation coefficient between the MRI measurement of the graft and the actual size of the harvested graft was 0.639. There were significant correlations between quadriceps tendon thickness and height (r = 0.3, p < 0.03), weight (r = 0.3, p < 0.01), BMI (r = 0.3, p < 0.04) and gender (r = -0.4, p < 0.002) and patellar tendon thickness and height (r = 0.4, p < 0.01), weight (r = 0.3, p < 0.01) and gender (r = -0.4, p < 0.012). CONCLUSION: Preoperative MRI measurements of quadriceps, patellar tendon and hamstring graft size are highly reliable with moderate-to-good accuracy. Significant correlations between patient anthropometric data and the thicknesses of the quadriceps and patellar tendons were observed. Obtaining this information can be useful for preoperative planning and to help counsel patients on appropriate graft choices prior to surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

The biomechanical strength of a hardware-free femoral press-fit method for ACL bone-tendon-bone graft fixation.

PURPOSE: The purpose was to investigate graft slippage and ultimate load to failure of a femoral press-fit fixation technique for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. METHODS: Nine fresh-frozen knees were used. Standardized harvesting of the B-PT-B graft was performed. The femora were cemented into steel rods, and a tunnel was drilled outside-in into the native ACL footprint and expanded using a manual mill bit. The femoral bone block was fixed press-fit. To pull the free end of the graft, it was fixed to a mechanical testing machine using a deep-freezing technique. A motion capture system was used to assess three-dimensional micro-motion. After preconditioning of the graft, 1000 cycles of tensile loading were applied. Finally, an ultimate load to failure test was performed. Graft slippage in mm ultimate load to failure as well as type of failure was noted. RESULTS: In six of the nine measured specimens, a typical pattern of graft slippage was observed during cyclic loading. For technical reasons, the results of three knees had to be discarded. 78.6 % of total graft slippage occurred in the first 100 cycles. Once the block had settled, graft slippage converged to zero, highlighting the importance of initial preconditioning of the graft in the clinical setting. Graft slippage after 1000 cycles varied around 3.4 ± 3.2 mm (R = 1.3-9.8 mm) between the specimens. Ultimate loading (n = 9) revealed two characteristic patterns of failure. In four knees, the tendon ruptured, while in five knees the bone block was pulled out of the femoral tunnel. The median ultimate load to failure was 852 N (R = 448-1349 N). CONCLUSION: The implant-free femoral press-fit fixation provided adequate primary stability with ultimate load to failure pull forces at least equal to published results for interference screws; hence, its clinical application is shown to be safe.

MRI evaluation to predict tendon size for knee ligament reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to evaluate a possible correlation between specific anthropometric parameters and sizes of knee tendons commonly used for ACL reconstruction. We hypothesized that specific clinical and radiological knee measurements could be better tendon sizes predictors than age, gender, height and weight. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 100 consecutive patients were enrolled and 77 patients met the inclusion criteria of the study. All patients underwent a MRI of the knee with a 1.5 T super conducting MR System. For each patient, anthropometric data such as gender, height, weight, body mass index (BMI) and knee circumference were recorded. Specific MRI knee measurements were performed on each study: patellar tendon (PT) thickness and length, quadriceps tendon (QT) thickness, semitendinosus tendon (ST) diameter, gracilis tendon (GR) diameter, the largest patella and intercondylar width. RESULTS: The mean ST diameter, QT thickness and PT thickness were higher in males than in females. No significant differences were noted between males and females concerning GT diameter and the knee circumference. In addition, male knees had greater patellar and intercondylar width than female knees. Significant, but only weak correlations were found between patient anthropometric data and hamstrings diameter, PT length, and QT and PT thickness. Intercondylar and patellar width present a moderate correlation between PT thickness, PT length and ST diameter. CONCLUSION: The intercondylar and patellar width presented a moderate correlation with PT thickness, PT length and ST diameter. Further, weak correlations were found between patient anthropometric data (gender, weight, height, BMI) and GR and ST diameter, PT length, and QT and PT thickness. This results may help surgeons during preoperative planning, specifically regarding graft choice and size. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Perineural dexamethasone with subsartorial saphenous nerve blocks in ACL reconstruction.

PURPOSE: Subsartorial saphenous nerve blockade (SSNB) is an effective analgesic alternative to femoral nerve blockade after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with bone-tendon-bone (BTB) autograft. It was hypothesized that dexamethasone in a SSNB will prolong analgesia, improve pain and satisfaction, and reduce postoperative opioid requirements and side effects. METHODS: One hundred ninety-five patients undergoing ACL reconstruction with BTB autograft (ages 16-65) were enrolled. Subjects received SSNB with 13 ml of 0.5 % bupivacaine (control group), 1 mg preservative-free dexamethasone +0.5 % bupivacaine (treatment group I), or 4 mg preservative-free dexamethasone +0.5 % bupivacaine (treatment group II). Subjects received identical perioperative management. On postoperative days 1 and 2, subjects reported perceived block duration, pain scores, satisfaction, opioid use, and side effects. Cox-proportional hazards modelling was used to compare block duration, adjusting for body mass index, age, sex, tourniquet time, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, and intravenous dexamethasone dose. RESULTS: Patient-perceived block duration was significantly increased in treatment group I [hazard ratio (95 % confidence interval [CI]) 0.48 (0.31-0.75); P = 0.001] and treatment group II (hazard ratio (95 % CI): 0.52 (0.33-0.81); P = 0.004) compared to control. The block was extended from a median (95 % CI) of 33.1 (28.4-37.3) to 41.2 (32.4-50.9) and 46.5 (35.8-48.9) hours, respectively. Additionally, patients in treatment group II reported increased time that block provided pain relief, higher patient satisfaction, lower pain scores at rest, and decreased drowsiness and confusion. CONCLUSION: The addition of 1 and 4 mg of dexamethasone to the block injectate significantly increased SSNB duration by 8-13 h compared to control. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level 1.

Case series: Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using patellar tendon autografts.

BACKGROUND: Using intra-operative findings and clinical results, including return to play (RTP) at the pre-injury level, this study investigated the causes of primary graft failure after revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with bone-patellar-tendon-bone (BPTB) autografts. METHODS: A total of 54 patients were followed for a mean of 38.2 ± 10.2 months post-surgery. Subjective and objective results were evaluated using single assessment numeric evaluation (SANE) scores, Lachman tests, KT-2000 arthrometer results, and pivot-shift tests. The change in each patient's Tegner activity scale and RTP at the pre-injury level were also evaluated. RESULTS: Inappropriate positioning of the tunnels was the most important reason (54%) for primary graft failure. After revision surgery, anterior knee stability was significantly improved (1.2 (mean) ± 1.2 (SD)mm vs 4.5(mean) ± 1.9 (SD)mm; P < 0.01). Two (4%) patients sustained revision graft ruptures while two (4%) sustained contralateral knee ACL tears. The rate of RTP at the pre-injury level was 67% (36 patients), and mean SANE scores at the time of RTP were higher than before surgery (74.8 ± 13.8 points vs 24.1 ± 16.4; P<0.001). The average time from primary graft failure to revision surgery was shorter (12.2 (mean) ± 4.0 (SD) vs 37.6 (mean) ± 8.8 (SD)months; P < 0.01) and the ratio of major cartilage injury was lower (39% vs 83%; P < 0.05) in the RTP group than that in the non-RTP group. CONCLUSIONS: The time from primary graft failure to revision surgery and the extent of the cartilage injury are major factors in RTP after revision ACL reconstructions.

Differences of clinical results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction between two different transplants / 中国矫形外科杂志

0.05).[Conclusion]Patients undergoing ACL reconstruction with non-irradiated deep-frozen allograft or autograft had similar clinical outcomes.Non-irradiated allograft is a reasonable alternative choice to autograft for ACL reconstruction.

Correlation Between Patients 'Satisfaction and Objective Measurement after ACL Reconstruction

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to correlate patients 'satisfaction with the objective measurement of the knee stability after a ACL reconstruction using a patellar tendon autograft. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Contact was made with 120 patients who a ACL reconstruction using a patellar tendon autograft on unilateral ACL rupture between January 1995 and April 2002 by single surgeon. Assessment was made by the KOOS score, Tegner score, Lysholm score, patients 'satisfaction, IKDC score, manual physical examination, one leg hop test and radiologic AP translation. Paired t-test, Pearson product moment correlation(PPMC) and Spearman 's rank correlation test were used to test the correlation between the parameters. RESULTS: Radiologic AP translation showed a statistically significant correlation with manual lachman and pivot shift tests. The Lysholm score had a high correlation with the patients 'satisfaction and one leg hop test. The final IKDC evaluation system showed the highest correlations with the Lysholm score, the patients 'satisfaction, the Tegner score, the manual lachman test, one leg hop test. Resumption of sports and work according to the Tegner score correlated with the patients 'satisfaction but had a very low correlation with manual lachman test. The knee laxity measurement using manual lachman test correlated with neither one leg hop test nor the patients 'satisfaction. The one leg hop test correlated with the Lysholm score, the patients 'satisfaction, the final IKDC evaluation system. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the final IKDC evaluation system is a very reliable tool and the patients 'satisfaction is important for evaluating the results after ACL reconstructiuon. And the one leg hop test also appear to be a reliable way of evaluating the functional outcome of the ACL reconstruction.

Second-Look Arthroscopy after ACL Reconstruction: Comparison of Patellar Tendon Autografts with Hamstring Tendon Autografts / 대한정형외과학회잡지

PURPOSE: To evaluate the healing status of reconstructed anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and meniscal repair through second-look arthroscopy after arthroscopic reconstruction of the ACL. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed 81 cases by second-look arthroscopy among 397 cases that received ACL reconstruction during the period from June 1996 to December 2000. Second-look arthroscopy was conducted on average 18.8 months after reconstruction. 53 cases received a patellar tendon autograft, 28 cases received a hamstring tendon autograft and 29 cases received meniscal repair. We measured graft tension using displacement by probing, and synovial coverage by visual analysis at second-look arthroscopy. The improvements in Lysholm knee scores and KT-2000 arthrometer results were evaluated to compare patellar and hamstring tendons. RESULTS: The patellar tendon group showed normal tension in 41 cases and lax tension in 12 cases. The hamstring tendon group showed normal tension in 22 cases and lax tension in 6 cases. In the patellar tendon group, synovial coverage was good in 38 cases, half in 4 cases, and pale in 11 cases, whereas the hamstring tendon group was good in 25 cases, half in 2 cases, and pale in 1 case. Synovial coverage was better in the hamstring tendon group (p<0.05). Although there was no statistical significance, the hamstring tendon group was superior to the patellar tendon group in terms of graft tension, Lysholm knee scores and KT-2000 arthrometer results. CONCLUSION: The hamstring tendon group with ACL reconstruction was superior to the patellar tendon group, but long term follow-up will be necessary to further evaluate results.