Comparison of robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-guided transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trails and cohort studies.

BACKGROUND: As an emerging technology in robot-assisted (RA) surgery, the potential benefits of its application in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) lack substantial support from current evidence. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate whether the RA TLIF is superior to FG TLIF in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease. METHODS: We systematically reviewed studies comparing RA versus FG TLIF for lumbar degenerative diseases through July 2022 by searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL (EBSCO), Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WanFang, VIP, and the Cochrane Library, as well as the references of published review articles. Both cohort studies (CSs) and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Evaluation criteria included the accuracy of percutaneous pedicle screw placement, proximal facet joint violation (FJV), radiation exposure, duration of surgery, estimated blood loss (EBL), and surgical revision. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias and ROBINS-I Tool. Random-effects models were used, and the standardized mean difference (SMD) was employed as the effect measure. We conducted subgroup analyses based on surgical type, the specific robot system used, and the study design. Two investigators independently screened abstracts and full-text articles, and the certainty of evidence was graded using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach. RESULTS: Our search identified 539 articles, of which 21 met the inclusion criteria for quantitative analysis. Meta-analysis revealed that RA had 1.03-folds higher "clinically acceptable" accuracy than FG (RR: 1.0382, 95% CI: 1.0273-1.0493). And RA had 1.12-folds higher "perfect" accuracy than FG group (RR: 1.1167, 95% CI: 1.0726-1.1626). In the case of proximal FJV, our results indicate a 74% reduction in occurrences for patients undergoing RA pedicle screw placement compared to those in the FG group (RR: 0.2606, 95%CI: 0.2063- 0.3293). Seventeen CSs and two RCTs reported the duration of time. The results of CSs suggest that there is no significant difference between RA and FG group (SMD: 0.1111, 95%CI: -0.391-0.6131), but the results of RCTs suggest that the patients who underwent RA-TLIF need more surgery time than FG (SMD: 3.7213, 95%CI: 3.0756-4.3669). Sixteen CSs and two RCTs reported the EBL. The results suggest that the patients who underwent RA pedicle screw placement had fewer EBL than FG group (CSs: SMD: -1.9151, 95%CI: -3.1265-0.7036, RCTs: SMD: -5.9010, 95%CI: -8.7238-3.0782). For radiation exposure, the results of CSs suggest that there is no significant difference in radiation time between RA and FG group (SMD: -0.5256, 95%CI: -1.4357-0.3845), but the patients who underwent RA pedicle screw placement had fewer radiation dose than FG group (SMD: -2.2682, 95%CI: -3.1953-1.3411). And four CSs and one RCT reported the number of revision case. The results of CSs suggest that there is no significant difference in the number of revision case between RA and FG group (RR: 0.4087,95% CI 0.1592-1.0495). Our findings are limited by the residual heterogeneity of the included studies, which may limit the interpretation of the results. CONCLUSION: In TLIF, RA technology exhibits enhanced precision in pedicle screw placement when compared to FG methods. This accuracy contributes to advantages such as the protection of adjacent facet joints and reductions in intraoperative radiation dosage and blood loss. However, the longer preoperative preparation time associated with RA procedures results in comparable surgical duration and radiation time to FG techniques. Presently, FG screw placement remains the predominant approach, with clinical surgeons possessing greater proficiency in its application. Consequently, the integration of RA into TLIF surgery may not be considered the optimal choice. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42023441600.

Robotic assisted surgery for the treatment of spinal metastases: A case series.

OBJECTIVE: Spinal metastases can significantly affect quality of life in patients with cancer and present complex neurosurgical challenges for surgeons. Surgery with instrumentation is often indicated to alleviate pain, preserve neurological function, and ensure mechanical stability. However, distortions in the bony anatomy due to oncological disease can decrease the accuracy of pedicle screw placement. Robotic-assisted surgery may offer an opportunity to increase screw accuracy and improve navigation of spinal lesions compared to conventional techniques. Therefore, we presented our institutional experience evaluating robotic-assisted surgical fixation for spinal metastases. METHODS: Patients undergoing robotic-assisted surgery at a large tertiary care center between January 2019 - January 2023 for the treatment of spinal metastases were identified. Patient characteristics, including demographics, tumor pathology, surgical complications, and post-operative outcomes were extracted. The Gertzbein Robbins classification system (GRS) was used to assess pedicle screw placement accuracy in patients with post-operative computed tomography. RESULTS: Twenty patients were identified, including 7 females (35 %), with an overall median age of 66 years (range: 39-80 years) and median BMI of 25 kg/m2 (range: 17-34 kg/m2). An average of four spinal levels were instrumented, with metastases located primarily in the thoracic (n=17, 85 %) spine. Common primary tumor types included prostate (n=4), lung (n=2), and plasma cell (n=2) cancers. Most pedicle screws (92 %) were classified as GRS A in patients with postoperative imaging. Post-operative complications were unrelated to the use of the robot, and included pulmonary embolism (n=1), deep vein thrombosis (n=2), and gastric symptoms (n=3). Three patients were readmitted at 30 days, with one reoperation due to tumor recurrence. Four patients were deceased within 6 months of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the inherent high-risk nature of these surgeries, this study underscores the safety and efficacy of robotic-assisted surgery in the management of spinal metastases. Robots can be helpful in ensuring accuracy of pedicle screw placement in patients with metastatic disease.

The optimal introversion angle and length of pedicle screw to avoid L1-S1 vascular damage.

BACKGROUND: posterior pedicle screw fixation is common method, one of the most severe complications is iatrogenic vascular damage, no report investigated association of different introversion angles (INTAs) and length of pedicle screw. The aims were to investigate the optimal introversion angle and length of pedicle screw for improving the safety of the operation, and to analyze the differences of vascular damage types at L1-S1. METHODS: Lumbar CT imaging data from110 patients were analyzed by DICOM software, and all parameters were measured by new Cartesian coordinate system, INTAs (L1-L5:5°,10°,15°,S1: 0°, 5°,10°,15°), DO-AVC (the distance between the origin (O) with anterior vertebral cortex (AVC)), DAVC-PGVs (the distance between AVC and the prevertebral great vessels (PGVs)), DO-PGVs (the distance between the O and PGVs). At different INTAs, DAVC-PGVs were divided into four grades: Grade III: DAVC-PGVs ≤ 3 mm, Grade II: 3 mm < DAVC-PGVs ≤ 5 mm, Grade I: DAVC-PGVs > 5 mm, and N: the not touching PGVs. RESULTS: The optimal INTA was 5° at L1-L3, the left was 5° and the right was 15° at L4, and screw length was less than 50 mm at L1-L4. At L5, the left optimal INTA was 5° and the right was 10°, and screw length was less than 45 mm. The optimal INTA was 15° at S1, and screw length was less than 50 mm. However, screw length was less than 40 mm when the INTA was 0° or 5° at S1. CONCLUSIONS: At L5-S1, the risk of vascular injury is the highest. INTA and length of the pedicle screw in lumbar operation are closely related. 3 mm interval of screw length may be more preferable to reduce vascular damage.

Efficacy of computer-assisted robotic based clinical training program for spinal oncology education on pedicle screw placement.

Pedicle screw placement (PSP) is the fundamental surgical technique that requires high accuracy for novice orthopedists studying spinal oncology education. Therefore, we set forth to establish a computer-assisted robotic navigation training program for novice spinal oncology education. Novice orthopedists were involved in this study to evaluate the feasibility and safety of the computer-assisted robotic navigation (CARN) training program. In this research, trainees were randomly taught by the CARN training program and the traditional training program. We prospectively collected the clinical data of patients with spinal tumors from 1st May 2021 to 1st March 2022. The ability of PSP was evaluated by cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis, learning curve, and accuracy of pedicle screws. The patients included in both groups had similar baseline characteristics. In the CUSUM analysis of the learning curve for accurate PSP, the turning point in the CARN group was lower than that in the traditional group (70th vs. 92nd pedicle screw). The LC-CUSUM test indicated competency for PSP at the 121st pedicle screw in the CARN group and the 138th pedicle screw in the traditional group. The accuracy of PSP was also significantly higher in the CARN group than in the traditional group (88.17% and 79.55%, P = 0.03 < 0.05). Furthermore, no major complications occurred in either group. We first described CARN in spinal oncology education and indicated the CARN training program as a novel, efficient and safe training program for surgeons.

Comparison of 3D-navigation and fluoroscopic guidance in percutaneous pedicle screw placement for traumatic fractures of the thoracolumbar junction.

Introduction: Fractures of the thoracolumbar junction are the most common vertebral fractures and can require surgical treatment. Several studies have shown that the accuracy of pedicle screw placement can be improved by the use of 3D-navigation. Still only few studies have focused on the use of navigation in traumatic spine injuries. Research question: The aim of this study was to compare the screw placement accuracy and radiation exposure for 3D-navigated and fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous pedicle screw placement in traumatic fractures of the thoracolumbar junction. Materials and methods: In this single-center study 25 patients undergoing 3D-navigated percutaneous pedicle screw placement for traumatic fractures of the thoracolumbar junction (T12-L2) were compared to a control group of 25 patients using fluoroscopy. Screw accuracy was determined in postoperative CT-scans using the Gertzbein-Robbins classification system. Additionally, duration of surgery, dose area product, fluoroscopy time and intraoperative complications were compared between the groups. Results: The accuracy of 3D-navigated percutaneous pedicle screw placement was 92.66 % while an accuracy of 88.08 % was achieved using standard fluoroscopy (p = 0.19). The fluoroscopy time was significantly less in the navigation group compared to the control group (p = 0.0002). There were no significant differences in radiation exposure, duration of surgery or intraoperative complications between the groups. Discussion and conclusion: The results suggest that 3D-navigation facilitates higher accuracy in percutaneous pedicle screw placement of traumatic fractures of the thoracolumbar junction, although limitations should be considered. In this study 3D-navigation did not increase fluoroscopy time, while radiation exposure and surgery time were comparable.

Comparative efficacy of robotic-assisted and freehand techniques for pedicle screw placement in spinal disorders: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

The efficacy and safety of robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement compared to traditional fluoroscopy-guided techniques are of great interest in the field of spinal surgery. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the outcomes of these two methods in patients with spinal diseases. Following the PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a systematic search across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. We included randomized controlled trials comparing robotic-assisted and fluoroscopy-guided pedicle screw placement in patients with spinal diseases. Outcome measures included the accuracy of pedicle screw placement, postoperative complication rates, intraoperative radiation exposure time, and duration of surgery. Data were analyzed using Stata software. Our analysis included 12 studies. It revealed significantly higher accuracy in pedicle screw placement with robotic assistance (odds ratio [OR] = 2.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.20-3.64, P < 0.01). Postoperative complication rates, intraoperative radiation exposure time, and duration of surgery were similar between the two techniques (OR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.31 to 1.68, P = 0.56 for complication rates; weighted mean difference [WMD] = - 0.13, 95% CI = - 0.93 to 0.68, P = 0.86 for radiation exposure time; WMD = 0.30, 95% CI = - 0.06 to 0.66, P = 0.06 for duration of surgery). Robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement offers superior placement accuracy compared to fluoroscopy-guided techniques. Postoperative complication rates, intraoperative radiation exposure time, and duration of surgery were comparable for both methods. Future studies should explore the potential for fewer complications with the robotic-assisted approach as suggested by the lower point estimate.

Pedicle screw placement accuracy in robot-assisted versus image-guided freehand surgery of thoraco-lumbar spine (ROBARTHRODESE): study protocol for a single-centre randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Robotic spinal surgery may result in better pedicle screw placement accuracy, and reduction in radiation exposure and length of stay, compared to freehand surgery. The purpose of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) is to compare screw placement accuracy of robot-assisted surgery with integrated 3D computer-assisted navigation versus freehand surgery with 2D fluoroscopy for arthrodesis of the thoraco-lumbar spine. METHODS: This is a single-centre evaluator-blinded RCT with a 1:1 allocation ratio. Participants (n = 300) will be randomized into two groups, robot-assisted (Mazor X Stealth Edition) versus freehand, after stratification based on the planned number of pedicle screws needed for surgery. The primary outcome is the proportion of pedicle screws placed with grade A accuracy (Gertzbein-Robbins classification) on postoperative computed tomography images. The secondary outcomes are intervention time, operation room occupancy time, length of stay, estimated blood loss, surgeon's radiation exposure, screw fracture/loosening, superior-level facet joint violation, complication rate, reoperation rate on the same level or one level above, functional and clinical outcomes (Oswestry Disability Index, pain, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, sensory and motor status) and cost-utility analysis. DISCUSSION: This RCT will provide insight into whether robot-assisted surgery with the newest generation spinal robot yields better pedicle screw placement accuracy than freehand surgery. Potential benefits of robot-assisted surgery include lower complication and revision rates, shorter length of stay, lower radiation exposure and reduction of economic cost of the overall care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05553028. Registered on September 23, 2022.

Utility of a Navigated High-Speed Drill in Robotic-Assisted Screw Placement for Spine Surgery.

Purpose To elucidate the utility of a navigated high-speed drill used after the version upgrade in surgeries assisted by a spinal robotics system. Methods The subjects were 166 patients who underwent screw placement using a spinal robotics system between April 2021 to July 2023. A significant change during the study was the introduction of a navigated high-speed drill in 80 post-upgrade cases, aimed at improving drilling accuracy. Screw accuracy was analyzed using the Gertzbein and Robbins classification on postoperative CT scans. Screws placed before (pre-upgrade group: 718 screws in 86 cases) and after the system upgrade (post-upgrade group: 747 screws in 80 cases) were compared in terms of perfect accuracy and deviation rates. Results There were no significant differences in demographics or surgical details between the two groups. No significant differences were observed in the overall perfect accuracy rate and deviation rate (2.4% pre-upgrade vs. 2.0% post-upgrade) between the two groups. For the percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS), the perfect accuracy rate was significantly higher, and the deviation rate was significantly lower in the post-upgrade group (26.1% pre-upgrade vs. 4.4% post-upgrade). Notably, the post-upgrade group achieved 100% perfect accuracy and 0% deviation for the cortical bone trajectory screw (CBT) technique. Conclusions The introduction of the navigated high-speed drill did not significantly alter the overall perfect accuracy or deviation rates for robotic-assisted screw placement. However, its use did demonstrate improved outcomes in specific techniques such as PPS and CBT, indicating its potential value in addressing skiving in robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgeries.

Novel Screw Placement Method for Extremely Small Lumbar Pedicles in Scoliosis.

Study Design: Consecutive case series. Objective: To propose a screw placement method in patients with extremely small lumbar pedicles (ESLPs) (<2 mm) to maintain screw density and correction power, without relying on the O-arm navigation system. Summary of Background Data: In scoliosis surgery, ESLPs can hinder probe passage, resulting in exclusion or substitution of the pedicle screws with a hook. Screw density affects correction power, making it necessary to maximize the number of screw placements, especially in the lumbar curve. Limited studies provide technical guidelines for screw placement in patients with ESLPs, independent of the O-arm navigation system. Methods: We enrolled 19 patients who underwent scoliosis correction surgery using our novel screw placement method for ESLPs. Clinical, radiological, and surgical parameters were assessed. After posterior exposure of the spine, the C-arm fluoroscope was rotated to obtain a true posterior-anterior view and both pedicles were symmetrically visualized. An imaginary pedicle outline was presumed based on the elliptical or linear shadow from the pedicle. The screw entry point was established at a 2 (or 10) o'clock position in the presumed pedicle outline. After adjusting the gear-shift convergence, both cortices of the transverse process were penetrated and the tip was advanced towards the lateral vertebral body wall, where an extrapedicular screw was placed with tricortical fixation. Results: Out of 90 lumbar screws in 19 patients, 33 screws were inserted using our novel method, without correction loss or complications during an average follow-up period of 28.44 months, except radiological loosening of one screw. Conclusions: Our new extrapedicular screw placement method into the vertebral body provides an easy, accurate, and safe alternative for scoliosis patients with ESLPs without relying on the O-arm navigation system. Surgeons must consider utilizing this method to enhance correction power in scoliosis surgery, regardless of the small size of the lumbar pedicle.

Anatomic distribution of basivertebral foramen with a magistral form in vertebral bodies of T10~L5 and its clinical significance for extensive epidural cement leakage in cement-augmented pedicle screw fixation: a multicenter case-control study.

BACKGROUND: There are no reports discussing anatomic distribution of basivertebral foramen (BVF) in the osteoporotic vertebral body, which is critical in the analysis of the risk of epidural cement leakage (ECL) after cement-augmented pedicle screw fixation (CAPSF). METHODS: 371 osteoporotic patients using 1898 cement-augmented screws were included. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) was used to determine the frequency, width, height, and depth of magistral BVF in T10~L5. Additionally, we measured the distance between BVF and the left/right borders of vertebral body as well as the distance between BVF and upper/lower endplates. Following CAPSF, the severity of ECL and the position of pedicle screws were determined by postoperative CT. Finally, significant risk factors for extensive ECL were identified through binary logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Of 2968 vertebral bodies ranging from T10 to L5, 801 (42.2%) had a magistral BVF. From T10 to L5, the frequency of magistral BVF appeared to gradually increase. The magistral BVF was much closer to the upper endplate and the depth accounted for about a quarter of anteroposterior diameter of vertebral body. Overall, there were 19 patients (5.1%) and 32 screws (1.7%) with extensive ECL, nine of whom had neurological symptoms. The independent risk factors for extensive ECL were the magistral BVF (OR = 8.62, P < 0.001), more volume of cement injected (OR = 1.57, P = 0.031), reduced distance from screw tip to vertebral midline (OR = 0.76, P = 0.003) and vertebral posterior wall (OR = 0.77, P < 0.001) respectively. CONCLUSION: When planning a CAPSF procedure, it is important to consider anatomical distribution of BVF and improve screw implantation methods.

Robot-navigated pedicle screw insertion can reduce intraoperative blood loss and length of hospital stay: analysis of 1,633 patients utilizing propensity score matching.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Navigation and robotic technologies have emerged as an alternative option to conventional freehand techniques for pedicle screw insertion. However, the effectiveness of these technologies in reducing the perioperative complications of spinal fusion surgery remains limited due to the small cohort size in the existing literature. PURPOSE: To investigate whether utilization of robotically navigated pedicle screw insertion can reduce the perioperative complications of spinal fusion surgery-including reoperations-with a sizeable cohort. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients who underwent primary lumbar fusion surgery between 2019 and 2022. OUTCOME MEASURES: Perioperative complications including readmission, reoperation, its reasons, estimated blood loss, operative time, and length of hospital stay. METHODS: Patients' data were collected including age, sex, race, body mass index, upper-instrumented vertebra, lower-instrumented vertebra, number of screws inserted, and primary procedure name. Patients were classified into the following two groups: freehand group and robot group. The variable-ratio greedy matching was utilized to create the matched cohorts by propensity score and compared the outcomes between the two group. RESULTS: A total of 1,633 patients who underwent primary instrumented spinal lumbar fusion surgery were initially identified (freehand 1,286; robot 347). After variable ratio matching was performed with age, sex, body mass index, fused levels, and upper instrumented vertebrae level, 694 patients in the freehand group and 347 patients in robot groups were selected. The robot group showed less estimated blood loss (418.9±398.9 vs 199.2±239.6 ml; p<.001), shorter LOS (4.1±3.1 vs 3.2±3.0 days; p<.001) and similar operative time (212.5 vs 222.0 minutes; p=.151). Otherwise, there was no significant difference in readmission rate (3.6% vs 2.6%; p=.498), reoperation rate (3.2% vs 2.6%; p=.498), and screw malposition requiring reoperation (five cases, 0.7% vs one case, 0.3%; p=1.000). CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative complications requiring readmission and reoperation were similar between fluoroscopy guided freehand and robotic surgery. Robot-guided pedicle screw insertion can enhance surgical efficiency by reducing intraoperative blood loss and length of hospital stay without extending operative time.

The incidence and risk factors for extensive epidural cement leakage in cement-augmented pedicle screw fixation: a multicenter retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: In cement-augmented pedicle screw fixation (CAPSF), epidural cement leakage (CL) is a frequently reported complication with the potential for neural injury, especially when it is extensive. To date, there has been no reports discussing basivertebral foramen morphology and pedicle screw placement, which is critical in the analysis of the risk of extensive epidural CL. Thus, this study aimed to identify the incidence and risk factors for extensive epidural CL in osteoporotic patients with CAPSF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 371 osteoporotic patients using 1898 cement-augmented screws were included. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) was utilized to characterize basivertebral foramen morphology. Following CAPSF, the severity of epidural CL, the implantation position of pedicle screw and cement extension within the vertebral body were determined by postoperative CT. In this study, significant risk factors for extensive epidural CL were identified through logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: There were 19 patients (5.1%) and 32 screws (1.7%) with extensive epidural CL. Nine patients (involving 19 screws) had neurological symptoms. The independent risk factors for patients with extensive epidural CL were decreased BMD and increased number of augmented screws. Significant predictors for extensive epidural CL were a magistral type of basivertebral foramen, more volume of cement injected, solid screw, a shallower screw implantation, and the smaller distance between the tip of the screw and the midline of vertebral body. CONCLUSION: Extensive epidural CL risk was significant in CAPSF when a magistral basivertebral foramen was present; solid screws and more volume of cement were used; and screw tip was implanted shallower or closer to the midline.

Comparison of Radiographic and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Surgery in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Between Robotics and Navigation: An Analysis Using Propensity Score Matching.

Purpose This study aimed to compare the radiographic and patient-reported outcomes after surgery in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) between robotics and navigation using propensity score matching. Methods This retrospective study involved 50 patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion for AIS between October 2016 and August 2022, utilizing navigation or robotic systems, analyzing them using propensity score matching. The evaluations included assessments using X-ray, Scoliosis Research Society 22-Item (SRS-22) Questionnaire, and CT, considering variables such as age, gender, BMI, and Lenke type. Results Post matching, 13 cases each from robotics and navigation groups were compared. No significant differences were found in the demographic variables, preoperative X-ray parameters, and preoperative SRS-22 scores between the two groups. The robotics group demonstrated a higher perfect accuracy rate (94.0% vs. 84.7%, p=0.005) and a lower deviation rate in pedicle screw placements (1.6% vs. 4.1%, p=0.223). At one year postoperatively, there were no significant differences in the X-ray parameters between both groups. Likewise, no significant differences were found in each domain of SRS-22, but function, self-image, mental health, and satisfaction scores were numerically higher in the robotics group. Conclusion The application of a spinal robotic system in AIS surgery presented enhanced screw accuracy and lower deviation rates, compared to navigation, with no significant differences observed in the X-ray parameters and each domain of SRS-22 at one year postoperatively. This suggests that, to improve patient quality of life (QOL), it is essential for robotic-assisted spine surgery to focus not only on screw accuracy but also on the development of novel robotic-assisted techniques.

Clinical efficacy of robotic spine surgery: an updated systematic review of 20 randomized controlled trials.

Purpose: To determine whether using robots in spine surgery results in more clinical advantages and fewer adverse consequences. Methods: Between October 1990 and October 2022, a computer-based search was conducted through the databases of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Biology Medicine, VIP databases, and WAN FANG. The study only included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the clinical efficacy and safety of robot-assisted surgery with those of conventional spine surgery. The review was conducted following PRISMA 2020, and AMSTAR-2 was used to evaluate the methodological quality. R version 4.2.1 was used in the meta-analysis. The Cochrane Collaboration Tool was used for evaluating the risk of bias. Results: This study analyzed 954 participants from 20 RCTs involving cervical spondylosis, lumbar degenerative disease, scoliosis, etc. The robot-assisted group outperformed the freehand group in terms of intraoperative blood loss, number of screws in grade A position, grade A + B position, radiation dose, and hospital stay. Operation duration, visual analog scale scores of low back pain, Oswestry disability index, and radiation exposure time did not significantly differ between the two groups. Conclusions: Although robotic spine surgery is more accurate in pedicle screw placement than conventional methods, the robot group did not demonstrate an advantage in terms of clinical efficacy. Studies of complications and cost-effectiveness are still very rare.

Comparing Cortical Bone Trajectory and Traditional Pedicle Screws in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Retrospective Cohort Study of One-Year Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: This is a retrospective study of consecutive patients undergoing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) at a single institution. The objective of this study was to compare the long-term results associated with cortical bone trajectory (CBT) and traditional pedicle screw (TPS) via posterolateral approach in TLIF. METHODS: Consecutive patients treated from November 2014 to March 2019 were included in the CBT TLIF group, while consecutive patients treated from October 2010 to August 2017 were included in the TPS TLIF group. Inclusion criteria comprised single-level or two-level TLIF for degenerative spondylolisthesis with stenosis and at least one year of clinical and radiographic follow-up. Variables of interest included pertinent preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative data. Non-parametric evaluation was performed using the Wilcoxon test. Fisher's exact test was used to assess group differences for nominal data. RESULTS: Overall, 140 patients met the inclusion criteria; 69 patients had CBT instrumentation (mean follow-up 526 days) and 71 patients underwent instrumentation placement via TPS (mean follow-up 825 days). Examination of perioperative and postoperative outcomes demonstrate comparable results between the groups with perioperative complications, length of stay, discharge destination, surgical revision rate, and fusion rates all being similar between groups (p = 0.1; p = 0.53; p = 0.091; p = 0.61; p = 0.665, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: CBT in the setting of TLIF offer equivalent outcomes to TPS with TLIF at both short- and long-term intervals of care.

3D printed pedicle screw guides reduce the rate of intraoperative screw revision in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Pedicle screw fixation has become common in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Malpositioned pedicle screws have significant complications and identifying surgical techniques to optimize screw placement accuracy is imperative. PURPOSE: To compare the rate of intraoperative revision, replacement, or removal of pedicle screws placed utilizing 3D printed guides compared with pedicle screws placed utilizing a freehand technique. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective cohort study/single academic center. PATIENT SAMPLE: Thirty-two patients aged 10 to 18 with AIS. OUTCOME MEASURES: Revision rate of pedicle screws and operative time between groups. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on patients 10 to 18 years of age who underwent posterior spinal instrumented fusion for AIS from February 2021 to July 2022. The study received an IRB exemption. Patient demographics, intraoperative measures, and outcome variables were recorded. Intraoperatively, all patients underwent a 3-dimensional fluoroscopic "check scan," which included axial, sagittal, and coronal images, to assess for screw accuracy. A secondary outcome of operative time was compared between groups. The p-values <.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: A total of 32 patients were included in this study. There were 17 cases in the 3D guided and 15 cases in fluoroscopy-guided freehand cohort. There was a total of 254 pedicle screws using 3D guides and 402 screws using freehand technique. Between cohorts, there were no significant differences in a number of levels fused (p=.54) or length of surgery (p=.36). The total revision rate of 3D guided screw placement was 5.5% and that of the freehand technique was 8.5%. The freehand screw placement group had significantly higher revision rates per vertebral level compared with 3D guided (p=.0096). Notably, 3D printed guides had fewer screws that were removed/revised for being too anterior (7.1%) compared with freehand (23.5%). Surgical time was not significantly different between the 3D guided and freehand cohort (p=.35). CONCLUSIONS: 3D printed guides reduce intraoperative revision rate compared with freehand techniques. Total operative time is comparable to freehand technique.

Using a 3D Navigation Template to Increase the Accuracy of Thoracic Pedicle Screws in Patients with Scoliosis.

This study compares the accuracy and safety of pedicle screw placement using a 3D navigation template with the free-hand fluoroscopy technique in scoliotic patients. Fifteen scoliotic patients were recruited and divided into a template group (eight cases) and a free-hand group (seven cases). All patients received posterior corrective surgeries, and the pedicle screw was placed using a 3D navigation template or a free-hand technique. After surgery, the positions of the pedicle screws were evaluated using CT. A total of 264 pedicle screws were implanted in 15 patients. Both the two techniques were found to achieve satisfactory safety of screw insertion in scoliotic patients (89.9% vs. 90.5%). In the thoracic region, the 3D navigation template was able to achieve a much higher accuracy of screw than the free-hand technique (75.3% vs. 60.4%). In the two groups, the accuracy rates on the convex side were slightly higher than on the concave side, while no significance was seen. In terms of rotational vertebrae, no significant differences were seen in Grades I or II vertebrae between the two groups. In conclusion, the 3D navigation template technique significantly increased the accuracy of thoracic pedicle screw placement, which held great potential for extensively clinical application.

The feasibility of a new self-guided pedicle tap for pedicle screw placement: an anatomical study.

PURPOSE: To investigate the safety and accuracy of applying a new self-guided pedicle tap to assist pedicle screw placement. METHODS: A new self-guided pedicle tap was developed based on the anatomical and biomechanical characteristics of the pedicle. Eight adult spine specimens, four males and four females, were selected and tapped on the left and right sides of each pair of T1-L5 segments using conventional taps (control group) and new self-guided pedicle taps (experimental group), respectively, and pedicle screws were inserted. The screw placement time of the two groups were recorded and compared using a stopwatch. The safety and accuracy of screw placement were observed by CT scanning of the spine specimens and their imaging results were graded according to the Heary grading criteria. RESULTS: Screw placement time of the experimental group were (5. 73 ± 1. 18) min in thoracic vertebrae and (5. 09 ± 1. 31) min in lumbar vertebrae respectively. Screw placement time of the control group were respectively (6. 02 ± 1. 54) min in thoracic vertebrae and (5.51 ± 1.42) min in lumbar vertebrae. The difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (P > 0. 05). The Heary grading of pedicle screws showed 112 (82.35%) Heary grade I screws and 126 (92.65%) Heary grade I + II screws in the experimental group, while 96 (70.59%) Heary grade I screws and 112 (82.35%) Heary grade I + II screws in the control group.The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The new self-guided pedicle tap can safely and accurately place thoracic and lumbar pedicle screws with low-cost and convenient procedure,which indicates a good clinical application value.

Augmented or Mixed Reality Enhanced Head-Mounted Display Navigation for In Vivo Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: This research paper provides a systematic literature review (SLR) on the current status of augmented-reality head-mounted devices (AR-HMDs) that guide and navigate spine surgeries and pedicle screw placement. METHODS: Embase, Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane Library and IEEE Xplore databases were screened for the systematic literature search to collect and statistically analyze live patient clinical, procedural and user experience data. Multi-level Poisson and binominal models were used for analysis. RESULTS: In vivo patient data, only the clinically widely used Gertzbein-Robbins Scale, were published as an outcome in the recent heterogeneous literature. The statistical analysis supports the hypothesis that using AR-HMDs has the same clinical outcomes as using more expensive robot-assisted surgical (RAS) systems. CONCLUSIONS: AR-HMD-guided pedicle screw insertion is reaching its technology readiness, providing similar benefits to RAS. Further meta-analysis is expected in the future from higher case-numbered and standardized randomized clinical trials.

Safety of robotic-assisted screw placement for spine surgery: Experience from the initial 125 cases.

BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to evaluate the safety of robot-assisted screw placement in 125 cases after introducing a spinal robotics system and to identify the situations where deviation was likely to occur. METHODS: The subjects were 125 consecutive patients who underwent robotic-assisted screw placement using a spinal robotics system (Mazor X Stealth Edition, Medtronic) from April 2021 to January 2023. The 1048 screws placed with robotic assistance were evaluated. We investigated intraoperative adverse events of the robotics system and complications occurring within 30 days after surgery. We evaluated screw accuracy and deviation and compared them for vertebral levels, screw insertion methods (open traditional pedicle screw [Open-PS], cortical bone trajectory screw [CBT], percutaneous pedicle screw [PPS], and S2 alar iliac screw [S2AIS]), diagnosis, and phases of surgical cases. RESULTS: The deviation rate of robotic-assisted screw placement for spine surgery was 2.2%. Complications were reoperation due to implant-related neurological deficit in 0.8% and surgical site infection in 0.8%. There was significant difference in the deviation rate between vertebral levels. The deviation rate of the T1-T4 level was high at 10.0%. There was significant difference in the deviation rate between Open-PS, CBT, PPS, and S2AIS. The PPSs had a high deviation rate of 10.3%. The deviation rates were not significantly different between patients with and without deformity. The deviation rate did not change depending on the experience of surgical cases, and the deviation rate was favorable from the onset. CONCLUSION: Although the robotic-assisted screw placement was safe, we should be extra vigilant when placing screws in the upper thoracic region (deviation rate 10.0%) and when using PPSs (deviation rate 10.3%).