Mid-term Clinical Outcomes of "Light Bulb" Core Decompression with Arthroscopic Assistance in Peri-collapse Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: A Retrospective Comparative Study.

OBJECTIVE: Nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is commonly encountered in orthopedics. Without early clinical intervention, most patients with peri-collapse of the ONFH will develop femoral head necrosis and eventually require hip replacement surgery. The aim of this study is to evaluate clinical outcomes in patients with ONFH who underwent "light bulb" core decompression (CD) with arthroscopic assistance and to compare them with the outcomes of those treated with traditional procedures. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with Stage II and IIIA (Peri-collapse) radiographic findings based on the Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) stage for ONFH who underwent "light bulb" CD with or without arthroscopic assistance by a single-surgeon team between March 2014 and December 2018 was performed. All patients were followed up for a minimum of 2 years. The visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score, Harris hip score (HHS), and radiological imaging were evaluated. The categorical parameters were analyzed by chi-square test and the continuous variables conforming to a normal distribution were analyzed by Student's t-test. RESULTS: The study included a total of 39 patients (18 and 21 patients in the with and without arthroscopic assistance groups, respectively), with a mean age of 40.3 years and a mean follow-up of 22.2 months. Overall, there was a better VAS score in the arthroscopic assistance group than in the control group (p < 0.05), There was a significant difference in HHS (80.1 ± 9.2 vs 75.1 ± 12.7) at the last follow-up (p < 0.05). The rate of good and excellent outcomes was 94%. Similarly, there was no significant difference in the total rate of complications or conversion to THA. CONCLUSION: With arthroscopic assistance, "light bulb" CD could be achieved via hip arthroscopy with less trauma, and it offered the opportunity for more precise evaluation and monitoring for therapy and yielded better VAS scores after surgery and better hip function outcomes at the last follow-up.

Analysis of MR Signs to Distinguish Between ARCO Stages 2 and 3A in Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head.

BACKGROUND: MRI is the most effective diagnostic tool of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH), especially for early diagnosis, but its detection of subchondral or cortical fractures is less accurate than CT. Therefore, it is difficult to accurately stage ONFH in the peri-collapse period by MRI. PURPOSE: To improve the accuracy of MR for distinguishing between Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) stages 2 and 3A in ONFH. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. SUBJECTS: One hundred and fifty five cases of ARCO stage 2/3A of ONFH underwent MR examinations, M/F = 72/83. CT was used as reference standard for collapse, which was decided by an orthopedist and a radiologist in consultation. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3 T/axial and coronal T1 -weighted Turbo Spin Echo (T1 W TSE) sequence, axial T2 -weighted fat-saturated (T2 W FS) TSE sequence, and coronal proton density-weighted imaging (PDWI)-FS-Dixon fat/water image. ASSESSMENT: Five potential MR signs (the maximum width of the necrotic-viable interface, bone marrow edema (BME), irregular articular surface of the femoral head, T2 heterogeneous high signal, and the absence of a necrotic-viable interface with the morphology of closed loop) were evaluated blindly by five radiologists independently and the total scores of different combinations of MR signs were calculated. STATISTICAL TESTS: Mann-Whitney U test and Chi-square test were used to evaluate age, gender, and MR signs differences between the two groups. ROC curve was used to access the distinguishing value of MR signs. The consistency of the five radiologists was analyzed by intraclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The area under the curve of the combined MR signs 2 for distinguishing between ARCO stages 2 and 3A was the greatest (0.967), sensitivity and specificity were 100.00% and 88.71% respectively, and greater than 1 was the threshold. DATA CONCLUSION: Combined MR signs 2 has great values in distinguishing between ARCO stages 2 and 3A in ONFH, thus helping clinical therapy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

[Clinical significance of different imaging manifestations of osteonecrosis of femoral head in the peri-collapse stage].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the different imaging manifestations of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) and their correlation with the occurrence of pain during the peri-collapse period. METHODS: The 372 patients (624 hips) with ONFH in the peri-collapse stage who were admitted between December 2016 and October 2019 and met the selection criteria were selected as the research objects. Among them, there were 270 males and 102 females, with an average age of 35.3 years (mean, 15-65 years). There were 120 cases of unilateral hip and 252 cases of bilateral hips. There were 39 cases (39 hips) of traumatic ONFH, 196 cases (346 hips) of hormonal ONFH, 102 cases (178 hips) of alcoholic ONFH, and 35 cases (61 hips) of idiopathic ONFH. Among them, there were 482 hips with pain symptoms and 142 hips without pain. The pain duration was less than 3 months in 212 hips, 3-6 months in 124 hips, 6-12 months in 117 hips, and more than 12 months in 29 hips. According to the Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) staging, the ONFH was rated as stage Ⅱ in 325 hips and stage Ⅲ in 299 hips. The patients were grouped according to ONFH etiology and ARCO staging, and hip joint pain and X-ray film (crescent sign and cystic changes), CT (subchondral bone fractures and cystic changes), and MRI (bone marrow edema, joint effusion, and subchondral hypointensity zone) were compared. Spearman rank correlation was used to determine the correlation between ONFH pain duration and X-ray film, CT, and MRI imaging manifestations. RESULTS: There were significant differences ( P<0.05) between ONFH patients with different etiologies in crescent sign on X-ray film, subchondral bone fracture on CT, and joint effusion on MRI. And there were significant differences ( P<0.05) between ONFH patients with different ARCO stages in hip pain duration and all imaging manifestations. Correlation analysis showed that the pain duration of ONFH patients was correlated with all imaging manifestations ( P<0.05). The cystic change on CT was correlated with the subchondral hypointensity zone and joint effusion grade on MRI, and subchondral hypointensity zone and joint effusion grade on MRI were also correlated ( P<0.05). CONCLUSION: The cystic changes, subchondral hypointensity zone, and joint effusion are closely related to the collapse of the femoral head and hip pain in patients with ONFH in the peri-collapse stage. The above-mentioned signals in stage Ⅱ ONFH indicate the instability of the femoral head, which is to predict the development of ONFH and the rational choice of hip-preserving treatment methods provides a basis.

Pericollapse Stage of Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: A Last Chance for Joint Preservation.

OBJECTIVE: To propose a new definition of the pericollapse stage of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) and review its significance in disease diagnosis and treatment selection. DATA SOURCES: A search for eligible studies was conducted in three electronic databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase up to August 10, 2018, using the following keywords: "osteonecrosis", "prognosis", and "treatment". STUDY SELECTION: Investigations appraising the clinical signs, symptoms, and imaging manifestations in different stages of ONFH were included. Articles evaluating the prognosis of various joint-preserving procedures were also reviewed. RESULTS: The pericollapse stage refers to a continuous period in the development of ONFH from the occurrence of subchondral fracture to early collapse (<2 mm), possessing specific imaging features that mainly consist of bone marrow edema and joint effusion on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), crescent signs on X-ray films, and clinical manifestations such as the sudden worsening of hip pain. Accumulating evidence has indicated that these findings may be secondary to the changes after subchondral fractures. Of note, computed tomography provides more information for identifying possible subchondral fractures than does MRI and serves as the most sensitive tool for grading the pericollapse lesion stage. The pericollapse stage may indicate a high possibility of progressive disease but also demonstrates satisfactory long- and medium-term outcomes for joint-preserving techniques. In fact, if the articular surface subsides more than 2 mm, total hip arthroplasty is preferable. CONCLUSIONS: The pericollapse stage with distinct clinical and imaging characteristics provides a last good opportunity for the use of joint-preserving techniques. It is necessary to separate the pericollapse stage as an independent state in evaluating the natural progression of ONFH and selecting an appropriate treatment regimen.

Pericollapse Stage of Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: A Last Chance for Joint Preservation / 中华医学杂志(英文版)

<p><b>Objective</b>To propose a new definition of the pericollapse stage of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) and review its significance in disease diagnosis and treatment selection.</p><p><b>Data Sources</b>A search for eligible studies was conducted in three electronic databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase up to August 10, 2018, using the following keywords: "osteonecrosis", "prognosis", and "treatment".</p><p><b>Study Selection</b>Investigations appraising the clinical signs, symptoms, and imaging manifestations in different stages of ONFH were included. Articles evaluating the prognosis of various joint-preserving procedures were also reviewed.</p><p><b>Results</b>The pericollapse stage refers to a continuous period in the development of ONFH from the occurrence of subchondral fracture to early collapse (<2 mm), possessing specific imaging features that mainly consist of bone marrow edema and joint effusion on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), crescent signs on X-ray films, and clinical manifestations such as the sudden worsening of hip pain. Accumulating evidence has indicated that these findings may be secondary to the changes after subchondral fractures. Of note, computed tomography provides more information for identifying possible subchondral fractures than does MRI and serves as the most sensitive tool for grading the pericollapse lesion stage. The pericollapse stage may indicate a high possibility of progressive disease but also demonstrates satisfactory long- and medium-term outcomes for joint-preserving techniques. In fact, if the articular surface subsides more than 2 mm, total hip arthroplasty is preferable.</p><p><b>Conclusions</b>The pericollapse stage with distinct clinical and imaging characteristics provides a last good opportunity for the use of joint-preserving techniques. It is necessary to separate the pericollapse stage as an independent state in evaluating the natural progression of ONFH and selecting an appropriate treatment regimen.</p>

[A summary of hip-preservation surgery based on peri-collapse stage of osteonecrosis of femoral head].

Objective: To summarize surgical procedures of hip-preservation based on peri-collapse stage of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). Methods: The basic points of peri-collapse stage theory was expounded. The related literature on surgical procedures was summarized and analyzed based on the theory. Results: Surgical procedures of hip-preservation tend to emphasize on mechanical repair, giving consideration to biological repair. It is consistent with the essence of peri-collapse stage theory, which attaches great importance to biomechanical stability. Conclusion: Peri-collapse stage theory has a guiding significance to the choice of surgical timing and approach, and it is one of the important theoretical basis for hip-preservation treatment.