Longitudinal medication adherence group-based trajectories of aging adults in the US: A retrospective analysis using monthly proportion of days covered calculations.

BACKGROUND: It is thought that half of the patients with chronic conditions are not adherent to their medications, which contributes to significant health and economic burden. Many studies estimate medication non-adherence by implementing a threshold of ≥80% of Proportion of Days Covered (PDC), categorizing patients as either adherent or non-adherent. Healthcare quality metrics pertaining to medication use are based on this dichotomous approach of medication adherence, including the Medicare Part D Star Ratings. Among others, the Medicare Part D Star Ratings rewards part D plan sponsors with quality bonus payments based on this dichotomous categorization of beneficiaries' medication adherence. OBJECTIVES: Describe the longitudinal adherence trajectories of adults ≥65 years of age covered by Medicare for 3 classes of drugs in the Part D Star Ratings: diabetes medications, statins, and select antihypertensives. METHODS: This study used Medicare healthcare administrative claims data linked to participants from the Health Retirement Study between 2008 and 2016. Group-based trajectory models (GBTM) elicited the number and shape of adherence trajectories from a sample of N = 11,068 participants for the three pharmacotherapeutic classes considered in this study. Medication adherence was estimated using monthly PDC. RESULTS: GBTM were estimated for the sample population taking antihypertensives (n = 7,272), statins (n = 8,221), and diabetes medications (n = 3,214). The hypertension model found three trajectories: high to very high adherence (47.55%), slow decline (32.99%), and rapid decline (19.47%) trajectories. The statins model found 5 trajectories: high to very high adherence (35.49%), slow decline (17.12%), low then increasing adherence (23.58%), moderate decline (12.62%), and rapid decline (11.20%). The diabetes medications model displayed 6 trajectories: high to very high adherence (24.15%), slow decline (16.84%), high then increasing adherence (25.56%), low then increasing (13.58%), moderate decline (10.60%), and rapid decline (9.27%). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed the fluid nature of long-term medication adherence to the medications considered in the Medicare Part D Star Ratings and how it varies by pharmacotherapeutic class. These challenge previous assumptions about which patients were considered adherent to chronic medications. Policy and methodological implications about medication adherence are discussed.

Prescription patterns of riluzole in a population of patients with motor neuron disease / Patrón de prescripción de riluzol en una población de pacientes con enfermedad de neurona motora

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: To determine the prescription pattern of riluzol and the variables associated to its use in a population of patients with motor neuron disease affiliated to the Colombian General Social Security Health System (SGSSS) in 2017. METHOD: Descriptive cross-sectional study. Through a systemized data base of approximately 3,5 million members to the Colombian SGSSS; patients who had been given riluzol uninterruptedly between April 1 and June 30 of 2017, were selected. Sociodemographic, pharmacological variables and comorbidities were analyzed. Defined daily dose (DDD) was estimated for 1.000 inhabitants/day and its costs. RESULTS: There were found 81 patients with motor neuron disease receiving riluzol, with an average age of 60,8+12,6 years. 48.1% were male. The prevalence of motor neuron disease was 29/100.000 individuals. Patients received riluzol in 50 mg tablets and the doses was estimated in 0,016 DDD for 1.000 inhabitants/day 63% were receiving medicines that reflect comorbidity or could interact with riluzol. The total cost of riluzol dispensed in 2017 was USD 85.348 and per prescribed daily dose on average was USD 2,3. CONCLUSIONS: The use of riluzol in patients with motor neuron disease in Colombia was carried by the recommended doses by the WHO and with a direct cost lower than reported in other countries. Studies are recommended in order to determine the effectiveness of riluzol in real-life conditions.

RESUMEN OBJETIVOS: Determinar el patrón de prescripción de riluzol y las variables asociadas a su utilización en una población de pacientes con enfermedad de neurona motora afiliados al Sistema General de Seguridad Social en Salud de Colombia (SGSSS) en 2017. METODOLOGÍA: Estudio descriptivo de corte transversal. Mediante una base de datos sistematizada de aproximadamente 3,5 millones de afiliados al SGSSS de Colombia; se seleccionaron pacientes a quienes se les haya dispensado riluzol de manera ininterrumpida entre 1 abril y 30 junio de 2017. Se analizaron variables socio-demográficas, farmacológicas y las comorbilidades. Se estimaron la dosis diaria definida (DDD) por 1.000 habitantes/día y los costos. RESULTADOS: Se encontraron 81 pacientes con enfermedad de neurona motora recibiendo riluzol, con edad promedio de 60,8+12,6 años. El 48,1% eran hombres. La prevalencia de enfermedad de neurona motora fue 2,29/100.000 personas. Los pacientes recibieron riluzol en tabletas de 50 mg y se estimó la dosis en 0,016 DDD por 1.000 habitantes/día. El 63% recibían medicamentos que reflejan comorbilidad o pudieran tener interacción con riluzol. El costo total del riluzol dispensado en 2017 fue USD 85.348 y por dosis diaria prescrita en promedio fue USD 2,3. CONCLUSIONES: El uso de riluzol en pacientes con enfermedad de neurona motora en Colombia se realizó a las dosis recomendadas por la OMS y con un costo directo menor al reportado en otros países. Se recomienda realizar estudios que permitan determinar la efectividad del riluzol en condiciones de la vida real.

How patients in Denmark acquire their medicines: overview, data sources and implications for pharmacoepidemiology.

The means by which patients acquire their medications differ between countries, and a knowledge of this is essential when conducting and interpreting pharmacoepidemiological studies. The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of how patients obtain medicines in Denmark, to relate these to nationwide registries available for research and to discuss the implications for research. Health services are predominantly tax-funded in Denmark, with dentistry and some medicine bought at community pharmacies being exceptions, involving partial reimbursement of charges. The paper gives an overview of prescription medicines acquired from community pharmacies (including magistral preparations), over-the-counter medicines, vaccinations and in-hospital medicine including so-called "free medicine" (in Danish: "vederlagsfri medicin"). "Free medicine" is medicines for a defined list of diseases and indications that is provided free of charge to patients in outpatient clinics. The paper also describes the content of the various Danish data sources about medicine use, summarizes their strengths and limitations, and exemplifies the ways of evaluating their completeness. An example is provided of the regional variation in the means by which medicines are acquired.

Comparison of medication adherence in diabetes mellitus patients on human versus analogue insulins.

Objetive: This study evaluated the results of treatment adherence scales in two cohorts of patients with diabetes mellitus treated either with human or analogue insulins. METHODS: A cohort study was conducted in diabetes mellitus patients older than 18 that were being treated with human or analogue insulins. Two instruments were applied to each patient [medication possession ratio, Morisky-Green test] to evaluate treatment adherence. RESULTS: A total of 238 patients, were included. The majority (69.4%) of the subjects had human insulin and 30.6% had insulin analogue prescriptions. Out of the total, 163 (68.5%) cases were classified as adherent to therapy, according to the type of insulin, as follows: 69.9% for conventional and 65.3% for analogues; without differences between the groups (CI95%:0.450-1.458). The adherence to treatment was more probable in patients with elementary-secondary education (OR:2.341; CI95%:1.199-4.568) and less probable for those in the age range of 31-45 years (OR:0.427; CI95%:0.187-0.971). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show that there are no significant statistical differences in adherence when comparing human with analogue insulin therapy. Strategies to improve treatment adherence are particularly important since they improve the clinical results.

Anticholinergic Risk and Frequency of Anticholinergic Drug Prescriptions in a Population Older Than 65.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the risk and frequency of anticholinergic drug prescriptions in a population affiliated with the Colombian General System of Social Security in Health. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 2013. PARTICIPANTS: Patients older than 65 years who received drugs with the potential to block cholinergic receptors, in accordance with an anticholinergic risk scale. MEASUREMENTS: The total anticholinergic load was determined by the sum of the risk of each prescribed drug. RESULTS: The study included a total of 27,654 patients with a mean age of 76.1 ± 7.6 years, and 61.9% were women. A total of 9.1% of the population older than 65 years had received a prescription of at least one of these drugs, and the prevalence of these prescriptions was 112.5 per 1000 members. The average number of drugs prescribed per patient was 1.4, and the drugs most frequently prescribed contained trazodone, methocarbamol, and loratadine. Being prescribed by practitioners of surgical or related specialties was the only variable significantly associated with prescriptions with high anticholinergic risk in the multivariate analysis (odds ratio 1.61; 95% confidence interval 1.335-1.934; P < .001). CONCLUSION: We found a high frequency of prescription medications with some degree of anticholinergic load, and in almost half of the patients, the anticholinergic risk score was very high. The prevalence of prescription of these drugs falls in the range of that reported globally. It is essential to educate prescribers about the risk to their patients.