Daily Variations of Corneal White-to-White Diameter Measured with Different Methods.

Purpose: A precise determination of the corneal diameter is essential for the diagnosis of various ocular diseases, cataract and refractive surgery as well as for the selection and fitting of contact lenses. The aim of this study was to investigate the agreement between two automatic and one manual method for corneal diameter determination and to evaluate possible diurnal variations in corneal diameter. Patients and Methods: Horizontal white-to-white corneal diameter of 20 volunteers was measured at three different fixed times of a day with three methods: Scheimpflug method (Pentacam HR, Oculus), placido based topography (Keratograph 5M, Oculus) and manual method using an image analysis software at a slitlamp (BQ900, Haag-Streit). Results: The two-factorial analysis of variance could not show a significant effect of the different instruments (p = 0.117), the different time points (p = 0.506) and the interaction between instrument and time point (p = 0.182). Very good repeatability (intraclass correlation coefficient ICC, quartile coefficient of dispersion QCD) was found for all three devices. However, manual slitlamp measurements showed a higher QCD than the automatic measurements with the Keratograph 5M and the Pentacam HR at all measurement times. Conclusion: The manual and automated methods used in the study to determine corneal diameter showed good agreement and repeatability. No significant diurnal variations of corneal diameter were observed during the period of time studied.

Prediction of anterior ocular surface sagittal heights using Placido-based corneal topography in healthy eyes.

PURPOSE: To investigate the validity of Placido-based corneal topography parameters to predict corneoscleral sagittal heights measured by Fourier-based profilometry at various diameters. METHODS: Minimal (Minsag ), maximal (Maxsag ) sagittal height, toricity (Maxsag - Minsag ) and axis of the flattest meridian (Minsag ) of 36 subjects (mean age 25.4 SD ± 3.2 years; 21 female) were measured using the Eye Surface Profiler and analysed for diameters (chord length) of 8 to 16 mm (in 2-mm intervals). Furthermore, corneal central radii, corneal astigmatism, eccentricity and diameter were measured using the Keratograph 5 M. RESULTS: Using multiple linear regression analysis, the best equation for predicting the sagittal heights for 8 mm (r2  = 0.95), and 10 mm (r2  = 0.93) diameters included corneal central radii and eccentricity. The best equation for predicting sagittal heights for 12 mm (r2  = 0.86), 14 mm (r2  = 0.78) and 16 mm (r2  = 0.65) diameters included corneal central radii, eccentricity and corneal diameter. Corneal astigmatism was significantly correlated with sagittal height toricity for 8 and 10 mm diameters (r2  = 0.50 and 0.29; p < 0.01), while no correlation was observed for 12, 14 and 16 mm diameters (p = 0.18 to p = 0.76). The axis of the flattest corneal meridian measured by Placido-based topography was significantly correlated with the axis of the flattest meridian measured by Fourier-based profilometry for 8, 10 and 12 mm diameters (r2  = 0.17 to 0.44; p < 0.05), while there was no correlation for 14 and 16 mm diameters (p = 0.48 and p = 0.75). For a typical soft contact lens diameter of 14 mm, 78% of the variance could be determined with a corneal topographer and 68% with keratometry and corneal diameter measurement. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of corneal central radii, eccentricity and corneal diameter measured by Placido-based topography is a valid predictor of the corneoscleral sagittal height in healthy eyes. Scleral toricity and axis of the flattest meridian seem to be independent from Placido-based corneal parameters and requires additional measuring tools.

Corneal topography with an aberrometry-topography system.

PURPOSE: To investigate the agreement between the central corneal radii and corneal eccentricity measurements generated by the new Wave Analyzer 700 Medica (WAV) compared to the Keratograph 4 (KER) and to test the repeatability of the instruments. METHODS: 20 subjects (10 male, mean age 29.1 years, range 21-50 years) were recruited from the students and staff of the Cologne School of Optometry. Central corneal radii for the flat (rc/fl) and steep (rc/st) meridian as well as corneal eccentricity for the nasal (enas), temporal (etemp), inferior (einf) and superior (esup) directions were measured using WAV and KER by one examiner in a randomized order. RESULTS: Central radii of the flat (rc/fl) and steep (rc/st) meridian measured with both instruments were statically significantly correlated (r = 0.945 and r = 0.951; p < 0.001). Comparison between the WAV and KER showed that rc/fl and rc/st measured with WAV were significantly steeper than those measured with KER (p < 0.001). Corneal eccentricities were statistically significantly correlated in all meridians (p < 0.05). Compared to KER, etemp and esup measured with WAV were greater (p < 0.05), while there were no statistically significant differences for enas and einf (p = 0.350 and p = 0.083). For the central radii, repeated measurements were not significantly different for the KER or WAV (p > 0.05). Limits of agreement (LoA) indicate a better repeatability for the KER compared to WAV. CONCLUSIONS: Corneal topography measurements captured with the WAV were strongly correlated with the KER. However, due to the differences in measured corneal radii and eccentricities, the devices cannot be used interchangeably. For corneal topography the KER demonstrated better repeatability.

Cornea and anterior eye assessment with placido-disc keratoscopy, slit scanning evaluation topography and scheimpflug imaging tomography.

Current corneal assessment technologies make the process of corneal evaluation extremely fast and simple and several devices and technologies allow to explore and to manage patients. The purpose of this special issue is to present and also to update in the evaluation of cornea and ocular surface and this second part, reviews a description of the corneal topography and tomography techniques, providing updated information of the clinical recommendations of these techniques in eye care practice. Placido-based topographers started an exciting anterior corneal surface analysis that allows the development of current corneal tomographers that provide a full three-dimensional reconstruction of the cornea including elevation, curvature, and pachymetry data of anterior and posterior corneal surfaces. Although, there is not an accepted reference standard technology for corneal topography description and it is not possible to determine which device produces the most accurate topographic measurements, placido-based topographers are a valuable technology to be used in primary eye care and corneal tomograhers expanding the possibilities to explore cornea and anterior eye facilitating diagnosis and follow-up in several situations, raising patient follow-up, and improving the knowledge regarding to the corneal anatomy. Main disadvantages of placido-based topographers include the absence of information about the posterior corneal surface and limited corneal surface coverage without data from the para-central and/or peripheral corneal surface. However, corneal tomographers show repeatable anterior and posterior corneal surfaces measurements, providing full corneal thickness data improving cornea, and anterior surface assessment. However, differences between devices suggest that they are not interchangeable in clinical practice.

Measurement of Corneal Power and Astigmatism Using Placido-based Videokeratography and Comparison with Other Keratometers

PURPOSE: In the present study, the repeatability and reproducibility of the corneal power and astigmatism measurements using placido-based video keratography were evaluated and the agreement with other keratometers were compared. METHODS: This prospective study included 45 patients (45 eyes) scheduled to undergo cataract surgery between November 2015 and January 2016. Three sets of corneal power and astigmatism were measured using placido-based video keratometer (Keratograph® 5M), automatic keratometer (KR-8900®), manual keratometer (B×L manual keratometer®), Placido-scanning-slit keratometer (ORBscan II®), Scheimpflug keratometer (Pentacam®), and low coherence interferometry (Lenstar LS900®). Reliability of each device was analyzed using the coefficient of variation, standard deviation and intraclass correlation coefficient. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to analyze the interdevice comparison of mean absolute difference. The agreement between the devices was evaluated with 95% limits of agreement (LoA) and Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: The mean corneal power, astigmatism and power vector analysis (J₀, J₄₅) were not significantly different among devices (p > 0.05). In the Bland-Altman plot analysis, the 95% LoA of corneal power, J₀, and J45 when comparing Keratograph® 5M with others ranged from -0.78 to 0.55 D, from -0.42 to 0.45 D, and from -0.39 to 0.47 D, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Keratograph® 5M showed good repeatability and reproducibility of corneal power and astigmatism measurements and was interchangeable with other keratometers.