Automatic planning for functional lung avoidance radiotherapy based on function-guided beam angle selection and plan optimization.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to develop a fully Automatic Planning framework for Functional Lung Avoidance Radiotherapy (AP-FLART). Approach: The AP-FLART integrates a dosimetric score-based beam angle selection method and a meta-optimization-based plan optimization method, both of which incorporate lung function information to guide dose redirection from high-functional lung (HFL) to low-functional lung (LFL). It is applicable to both contour-based FLART (cFLART) and voxel-based FLART (vFLART) optimization options. A cohort of 18 lung cancer patient cases underwent planning-CT and SPECT perfusion scans were collected. AP-FLART was applied to generate conventional RT (ConvRT), cFLART, and vFLART plans for all cases. We compared automatic against manual ConvRT plans as well as automatic ConvRT against FLART plans, to evaluate the effectiveness of AP-FLART. Ablation studies were performed to evaluate the contribution of function-guided beam angle selection and plan optimization to dose redirection. Main results: Automatic ConvRT plans generated by AP-FALRT exhibited similar quality compared to manual counterparts. Furthermore, compared to automatic ConvRT plans, HFL mean dose, V20, and V5 were significantly reduced by 1.13 Gy (p<.001), 2.01% (p<.001), and 6.66% (p<.001) respectively for cFLART plans. Besides, vFLART plans showed a decrease in lung functionally weighted mean dose by 0.64 Gy (p<.01), fV20 by 0.90% (p=0.099), and fV5 by 5.07% (p<.01) respectively. Though inferior conformity was observed, all dose constraints were well satisfied. The ablation study results indicated that both function-guided beam angle selection and plan optimization significantly contributed to dose redirection. Significance: AP-FLART can effectively redirect doses from HFL to LFL without severely degrading conventional dose metrics, producing high-quality FLART plans. It has the potential to advance the research and clinical application of FLART by providing labor-free, consistent, and high-quality plans. Keywords: Functional lung avoidance radiotherapy; Automatic planning; Beam angle selection; Plan optimization.

A new approach to combined proton-photon therapy for metastatic cancer patients.

Objective.Proton therapy is a limited resource and is typically not available to metastatic cancer patients. Combined proton-photon therapy (CPPT), where most fractions are delivered with photons and only few with protons, represents an approach to distribute proton resources over a larger patient population. In this study, we consider stereotactic radiotherapy of multiple brain or liver metastases, and develop an approach to optimally take advantage of a single proton fraction by optimizing the proton and photon dose contributions to each individual metastasis.Approach.CPPT treatments must balance two competing goals: (1) deliver a larger dose in the proton fractions to reduce integral dose, and (2) fractionate the dose in the normal tissue between metastases, which requires using the photon fractions. Such CPPT treatments are generated by simultaneously optimizing intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans based on their cumulative biologically effective dose (BEDα/ß). The dose contributions of the proton and photon fractions to each individual metastasis are handled as additional optimization variables in the optimization problem. The method is demonstrated for two patients with 29 and 30 brain metastases, and two patients with 4 and 3 liver metastases.Main results.Optimized CPPT plans increase the proton dose contribution to most of the metastases, while using photons to fractionate the dose around metastases which are large or located close to critical structures. On average, the optimized CPPT plans reduce the mean brain BED2by 29% and the mean liver BED4by 42% compared to IMRT-only plans. Thereby, the CPPT plans approach the dosimetric quality of IMPT-only plans, for which the mean brain BED2and mean liver BED4are reduced by 28% and 58%, respectively, compared to IMRT-only plans.Significance.CPPT with optimized proton and photon dose contributions to individual metastases may benefit selected metastatic cancer patients without tying up major proton resources.

An optimization model for monthly time-step drilling schedule under planned field production.

The field production profile over the yearly horizon is planned for a balance between economy, security, and sustainability of energy. An optimal drilling schedule is required to achieve the planned production profile with minimized drilling frequency and summation. In this study, we treat each possible production process of each well as a dependent time series and the basic unit. Then we ensemble all of them into a tensor. Based on formulated tensor calculation and Lasso regularization, a linear mathematical optimization model for well drilling schedule was developed. The model is aimed at minimizing production profile error while optimizing drilling frequency and summation. Although the model proposed in this work requires more memory consumption to be solved using a computer, it is assured as a linear model and could be numerically globally solved in a stable and efficient way using gradient descent, avoiding complex nonlinear programming problems. Main input data and parameters involved in the model are analyzed in detail to understand the effects of different production parameters on the drilling schedule and production profile. The proposed model in this work can evaluate the manual drilling schedule and automatically generate an optimized drilling schedule for the gas field, significantly reducing development plan formulation time.

Large-scale dose evaluation of deep learning organ contours in head-and-neck radiotherapy by leveraging existing plans.

Background and purpose: Retrospective dose evaluation for organ-at-risk auto-contours has previously used small cohorts due to additional manual effort required for treatment planning on auto-contours. We aimed to do this at large scale, by a) proposing and assessing an automated plan optimization workflow that used existing clinical plan parameters and b) using it for head-and-neck auto-contour dose evaluation. Materials and methods: Our automated workflow emulated our clinic's treatment planning protocol and reused existing clinical plan optimization parameters. This workflow recreated the original clinical plan (POG) with manual contours (PMC) and evaluated the dose effect (POG-PMC) on 70 photon and 30 proton plans of head-and-neck patients. As a use-case, the same workflow (and parameters) created a plan using auto-contours (PAC) of eight head-and-neck organs-at-risk from a commercial tool and evaluated their dose effect (PMC-PAC). Results: For plan recreation (POG-PMC), our workflow had a median impact of 1.0% and 1.5% across dose metrics of auto-contours, for photon and proton respectively. Computer time of automated planning was 25% (photon) and 42% (proton) of manual planning time. For auto-contour evaluation (PMC-PAC), we noticed an impact of 2.0% and 2.6% for photon and proton radiotherapy. All evaluations had a median ΔNTCP (Normal Tissue Complication Probability) less than 0.3%. Conclusions: The plan replication capability of our automated program provides a blueprint for other clinics to perform auto-contour dose evaluation with large patient cohorts. Finally, despite geometric differences, auto-contours had a minimal median dose impact, hence inspiring confidence in their utility and facilitating their clinical adoption.

Full daily re-optimization improves plan quality during online adaptive radiotherapy.

Background and purpose: Daily online treatment plan adaptation requires a fast workflow and planning process. Current online planning consists of adaptation of a predefined reference plan, which might be suboptimal in cases of large anatomic changes. The aim of this study was to investigate plan quality differences between the current online re-planning approach and a complete re-optimization. Material and methods: Magnetic resonance linear accelerator reference plans for ten prostate cancer patients were automatically generated using particle swarm optimization (PSO). Adapted plans were created for each fraction using (1) the current re-planning approach and (2) full PSO re-optimization and evaluated overall compliance with institutional dose-volume criteria compared to (3) clinically delivered fractions. Relative volume differences between reference and daily anatomy were assessed for planning target volumes (PTV60, PTV57.6), rectum and bladder and correlated with dose-volume results. Results: The PSO approach showed significantly higher adherence to dose-volume criteria than the reference approach and clinical fractions (p < 0.001). In 74 % of PSO plans at most one criterion failed compared to 56 % in the reference approach and 41 % in clinical plans. A fair correlation between PTV60 D98% and relative bladder volume change was observed for the reference approach. Bladder volume reductions larger than 50 % compared to the reference plan recurrently decreased PTV60 D98% below 56 Gy. Conclusion: Complete re-optimization maintained target coverage and organs at risk sparing even after large anatomic variations. Re-planning based on daily magnetic resonance imaging was sufficient for small variations, while large variations led to decreasing target coverage and organ-at-risk sparing.

The dirty and clean dose concept: Towards creating proton therapy treatment plans with a photon-like dose response.

BACKGROUND: Applying tolerance doses for organs at risk (OAR) from photon therapy introduces uncertainties in proton therapy when assuming a constant relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of 1.1. PURPOSE: This work introduces the novel dirty and clean dose concept, which allows for creating treatment plans with a more photon-like dose response for OAR and, thus, less uncertainties when applying photon-based tolerance doses. METHODS: The concept divides the 1.1-weighted dose distribution into two parts: the clean and the dirty dose. The clean and dirty dose are deposited by protons with a linear energy transfer (LET) below and above a set LET threshold, respectively. For the former, a photon-like dose response is assumed, while for the latter, the RBE might exceed 1.1. To reduce the dirty dose in OAR, a MaxDirtyDose objective was added in treatment plan optimization. It requires setting two parameters: LET threshold and max dirty dose level. A simple geometry consisting of one target volume and one OAR in water was used to study the reduction in dirty dose in the OAR depending on the choice of the two MaxDirtyDose objective parameters during plan optimization. The best performing parameter combinations were used to create multiple dirty dose optimized (DDopt) treatment plans for two cranial patient cases. For each DDopt plan, 1.1-weighted dose, variable RBE-weighted dose using the Wedenberg RBE model and dose-average LETd distributions as well as resulting normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) values were calculated and compared to the reference plan (RefPlan) without MaxDirtyDose objectives. RESULTS: In the water phantom studies, LET thresholds between 1.5 and 2.5 keV/µm yielded the best plans and were subsequently used. For the patient cases, nearly all DDopt plans led to a reduced Wedenberg dose in critical OAR. This reduction resulted from an LET reduction and translated into an NTCP reduction of up to 19 percentage points compared to the RefPlan. The 1.1-weighted dose in the OARs was slightly increased (patient 1: 0.45 Gy(RBE), patient 2: 0.08 Gy(RBE)), but never exceeded clinical tolerance doses. Additionally, slightly increased 1.1-weighted dose in healthy brain tissue was observed (patient 1: 0.81 Gy(RBE), patient 2: 0.53 Gy(RBE)). The variation of NTCP values due to variation of α/ß from 2 to 3 Gy was much smaller for DDopt (2 percentage points (pp)) than for RefPlans (5 pp). CONCLUSIONS: The novel dirty and clean dose concept allows for creating biologically more robust proton treatment plans with a more photon-like dose response. The reduced uncertainties in RBE can, therefore, mitigate uncertainties introduced by using photon-based tolerance doses for OAR.

Development of an automated treatment planning approach for lattice radiation therapy.

BACKGROUND: Lattice radiation therapy (LRT) alternates regions of high and low doses within the target. The heterogeneous dose distribution is delivered to a geometrical structure of vertices segmented inside the tumor. LRT is typically used to treat patients with large tumor volumes with cytoreduction intent. Due to the geometric complexity of the target volume and the required dose distribution, LRT treatment planning demands additional resources, which may limit clinical integration. PURPOSE: We introduce a fully automated method to (1) generate an ordered lattice of vertices with various sizes and center-to-center distances and (2) perform dose optimization and calculation. We aim to report the dosimetry associated with these lattices to help clinical decision-making. METHODS: Sarcoma cancer patients with tumor volume between 100 cm3 and 1500 cm3 who received radiotherapy treatment between 2010 and 2018 at our institution were considered for inclusion. Automated segmentation and dose optimization/calculation were performed by using the Eclipse Scripting Application Programming Interface (ESAPI, v16, Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, USA). Vertices were modeled by spheres segmented within the gross tumor volume (GTV) with 1 cm/1.5 cm/2 cm diameters (LRT-1 cm/1.5 cm/2 cm) and 2 to 5 cm center-to-center distance on square lattices alternating along the superior-inferior direction. Organs at risk were modeled by subtracting the GTV from the body structure (body-GTV). The prescription dose was that 50% of the vertice volume should receive at least 20 Gy in one fraction. The automated dose optimization included three stages. The vertices optimization objectives were refined during optimization according to their values at the end of the first and second stages. Lattices were classified according to a score based on the minimization of body-GTV max dose and the maximization of GTV dose uniformity (measured with the equivalent uniform dose [EUD]), GTV dose heterogeneity (measured with the GTV D90%/D10% ratio), and the number of patients with more than one vertex inserted in the GTV. Plan complexity was measured with the modulation complexity score (MCS). Correlations were assessed with the Spearman correlation coefficient (r) and its associated p-value. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients with GTV volumes between 150 and 1350 cm3 (median GTV volume = 494 cm3 , IQR = 272-779 cm3 were included. The median time required for segmentation/planning was 1 min/21 min. The number of vertices was strongly correlated with GTV volume in each LRT lattice for each center-to-center distance (r > 0.85, p-values < 0.001 in each case). Lattices with center-to-center distance = 2.5 cm/3 cm/3.5 cm in LRT-1.5 cm and center-to-center distance = 4 cm in LRT-1 cm had the best scores. These lattices were characterized by high heterogeneity (median GTV D90%/D10% between 0.06 and 0.19). The generated plans were moderately complex (median MCS ranged between 0.19 and 0.40). CONCLUSIONS: The automated LRT planning method allows for the efficacious generation of vertices arranged in an ordered lattice and the refinement of planning objectives during dose optimization, enabling the systematic evaluation of LRT dosimetry from various lattice geometries.

Treatment of Central Nervous System Tumors on Combination MR-Linear Accelerators: Review of Current Practice and Future Directions.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides excellent visualization of central nervous system (CNS) tumors due to its superior soft tissue contrast. Magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) has historically been limited to use in the initial treatment planning stage due to cost and feasibility. MRI-guided linear accelerators (MRLs) allow clinicians to visualize tumors and organs at risk (OARs) directly before and during treatment, a process known as online MRgRT. This novel system permits adaptive treatment planning based on anatomical changes to ensure accurate dose delivery to the tumor while minimizing unnecessary toxicity to healthy tissue. These advancements are critical to treatment adaptation in the brain and spinal cord, where both preliminary MRI and daily CT guidance have typically had limited benefit. In this narrative review, we investigate the application of online MRgRT in the treatment of various CNS malignancies and any relevant ongoing clinical trials. Imaging of glioblastoma patients has shown significant changes in the gross tumor volume over a standard course of chemoradiotherapy. The use of adaptive online MRgRT in these patients demonstrated reduced target volumes with cavity shrinkage and a resulting reduction in radiation dose to uninvolved tissue. Dosimetric feasibility studies have shown MRL-guided stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for intracranial and spine tumors to have potential dosimetric advantages and reduced morbidity compared with conventional linear accelerators. Similarly, dosimetric feasibility studies have shown promise in hippocampal avoidance whole brain radiotherapy (HA-WBRT). Next, we explore the potential of MRL-based multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and genomically informed radiotherapy to treat CNS disease with cutting-edge precision. Lastly, we explore the challenges of treating CNS malignancies and special limitations MRL systems face.

Superiorization of projection algorithms for linearly constrained inverse radiotherapy treatment planning.

Objective: We apply the superiorization methodology to the constrained intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment planning problem. Superiorization combines a feasibility-seeking projection algorithm with objective function reduction: The underlying projection algorithm is perturbed with gradient descent steps to steer the algorithm towards a solution with a lower objective function value compared to one obtained solely through feasibility-seeking. Approach: Within the open-source inverse planning toolkit matRad, we implement a prototypical algorithmic framework for superiorization using the well-established Agmon, Motzkin, and Schoenberg (AMS) feasibility-seeking projection algorithm and common nonlinear dose optimization objective functions. Based on this prototype, we apply superiorization to intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment planning and compare it with (i) bare feasibility-seeking (i.e., without any objective function) and (ii) nonlinear constrained optimization using first-order derivatives. For these comparisons, we use the TG119 water phantom, the head-and-neck and the prostate patient of the CORT dataset. Main results: Bare feasibility-seeking with AMS confirms previous studies, showing it can find solutions that are nearly equivalent to those found by the established piece-wise least-squares optimization approach. The superiorization prototype solved the linearly constrained planning problem with similar dosimetric performance to that of a general-purpose nonlinear constrained optimizer while showing smooth convergence in both constraint proximity and objective function reduction. Significance: Superiorization is a useful alternative to constrained optimization in radiotherapy inverse treatment planning. Future extensions with other approaches to feasibility-seeking, e.g., with dose-volume constraints and more sophisticated perturbations, may unlock its full potential for high performant inverse treatment planning.

Spatiotemporal fractionation schemes for stereotactic radiosurgery of multiple brain metastases.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an established treatment for patients with brain metastases (BMs). However, damage to the healthy brain may limit the tumor dose for patients with multiple lesions. PURPOSE: In this study, we investigate the potential of spatiotemporal fractionation schemes to reduce the biological dose received by the healthy brain in SRS of multiple BMs, and also demonstrate a novel concept of spatiotemporal fractionation for polymetastatic cancer patients that faces less hurdles for clinical implementation. METHODS: Spatiotemporal fractionation (STF) schemes aim at partial hypofractionation in the metastases along with more uniform fractionation in the healthy brain. This is achieved by delivering distinct dose distributions in different fractions, which are designed based on their cumulative biologically effective dose ( BED α / ß ${\rm{BED}}_{{{\alpha}}/{{\beta}}}$ ) such that each fraction contributes with high doses to complementary parts of the target volume, while similar dose baths are delivered to the normal tissue. For patients with multiple brain metastases, a novel constrained approach to spatiotemporal fractionation (cSTF) is proposed, which is more robust against setup and biological uncertainties. The approach aims at irradiating entire metastases with possibly different doses, but spatially similar dose distributions in every fraction, where the optimal dose contribution of every fraction to each metastasis is determined using a new planning objective to be added to the BED-based treatment plan optimization problem. The benefits of spatiotemporal fractionation schemes are evaluated for three patients, each with >25 BMs. RESULTS: For the same tumor BED10 and the same brain volume exposed to high doses in all plans, the mean brain BED2 can be reduced compared to uniformly fractionated plans by 9%-12% with the cSTF plans and by 13%-19% with the STF plans. In contrast to the STF plans, the cSTF plans avoid partial irradiation of the individual metastases and are less sensitive to misalignments of the fractional dose distributions when setup errors occur. CONCLUSION: Spatiotemporal fractionation schemes represent an approach to lower the biological dose to the healthy brain in SRS-based treatments of multiple BMs. Although cSTF cannot achieve the full BED reduction of STF, it improves on uniform fractionation and is more robust against both setup errors and biological uncertainties related to partial tumor irradiation.

Stereotactic Magnetic Resonance-Guided Adaptive and Non-Adaptive Radiotherapy on Combination MR-Linear Accelerators: Current Practice and Future Directions.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an effective radiation therapy technique that has allowed for shorter treatment courses, as compared to conventionally dosed radiation therapy. As its name implies, SBRT relies on daily image guidance to ensure that each fraction targets a tumor, instead of healthy tissue. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers improved soft-tissue visualization, allowing for better tumor and normal tissue delineation. MR-guided RT (MRgRT) has traditionally been defined by the use of offline MRI to aid in defining the RT volumes during the initial planning stages in order to ensure accurate tumor targeting while sparing critical normal tissues. However, the ViewRay MRIdian and Elekta Unity have improved upon and revolutionized the MRgRT by creating a combined MRI and linear accelerator (MRL), allowing MRgRT to incorporate online MRI in RT. MRL-based MR-guided SBRT (MRgSBRT) represents a novel solution to deliver higher doses to larger volumes of gross disease, regardless of the proximity of at-risk organs due to the (1) superior soft-tissue visualization for patient positioning, (2) real-time continuous intrafraction assessment of internal structures, and (3) daily online adaptive replanning. Stereotactic MR-guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) has enabled the safe delivery of ablative doses to tumors adjacent to radiosensitive tissues throughout the body. Although it is still a relatively new RT technique, SMART has demonstrated significant opportunities to improve disease control and reduce toxicity. In this review, we included the current clinical applications and the active prospective trials related to SMART. We highlighted the most impactful clinical studies at various tumor sites. In addition, we explored how MRL-based multiparametric MRI could potentially synergize with SMART to significantly change the current treatment paradigm and to improve personalized cancer care.

Towards artificial intelligence-based automated treatment planning in clinical practice: A prospective study of the first clinical experiences in high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: This prospective study evaluates our first clinical experiences with the novel ``BRachytherapy via artificial Intelligent GOMEA-Heuristic based Treatment planning'' (BRIGHT) applied to high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between March 2020 and October 2021, 14 prostate cancer patients were treated in our center with a 15Gy HDR-brachytherapy boost. BRIGHT was used for bi-objective treatment plan optimization and selection of the most desirable plans from a coverage-sparing trade-off curve. Selected BRIGHT plans were imported into the commercial treatment planning system Oncentra Brachy . In Oncentra Brachy a dose distribution comparison was performed for clinical plan choice, followed by manual fine-tuning of the preferred BRIGHT plan when deemed necessary. The reasons for plan selection, clinical plan choice, and fine-tuning, as well as process speed were monitored. For each patient, the dose-volume parameters of the (fine-tuned) clinical plan were evaluated. RESULTS: In all patients, BRIGHT provided solutions satisfying all protocol values for coverage and sparing. In four patients not all dose-volume criteria of the clinical plan were satisfied after manual fine-tuning. Detailed information on tumour coverage, dose-distribution, dwell time pattern, and insight provided by the patient-specific trade-off curve, were used for clinical plan choice. Median time spent on treatment planning was 42 min, consisting of 16 min plan optimization and selection, and 26 min undesirable process steps. CONCLUSIONS: BRIGHT is implemented in our clinic and provides automated prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy planning with trade-off based plan selection. Based on our experience, additional optimization aims need to be implemented to further improve direct clinical applicability of treatment plans and process efficiency.

Use of dose-area product to assess plan quality in robotic radiosurgery.

PURPOSE: In robotic stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), optimal selection of collimators from a set of fixed cones must be determined manually by trial and error. A unique and uniformly scaled metric to characterize plan quality could help identify Pareto-efficient treatment plans. METHODS: The concept of dose-area product (DAP) was used to define a measure (DAPratio) of the targeting efficiency of a set of beams by relating the integral DAP of the beams to the mean dose achieved in the target volume. In a retrospective study of five clinical cases of brain metastases with representative target volumes (range: 0.5-5.68 ml) and 121 treatment plans with all possible collimator choices, the DAPratio was determined along with other plan metrics (conformity index CI, gradient index R50%, treatment time, total number of monitor units TotalMU, radiotoxicity index f12, and energy efficiency index η50%), and the respective Spearman's rank correlation coefficients were calculated. The ability of DAPratio to determine Pareto efficiency for collimator selection at DAPratio < 1 and DAPratio < 0.9 was tested using scatter plots. RESULTS: The DAPratio for all plans was on average 0.95 ±â€¯0.13 (range: 0.61-1.31). Only the variance of the DAPratio was strongly dependent on the number of collimators. For each target, there was a strong or very strong correlation of DAPratio with all other metrics of plan quality. Only for R50% and η50% was there a moderate correlation with DAPratio for the plans of all targets combined, as R50% and η50% strongly depended on target size. Optimal treatment plans with CI, R50%, f12, and η50% close to 1 were clearly associated with DAPratio < 1, and plans with DAPratio < 0.9 were even superior, but at the cost of longer treatment times and higher total monitor units. CONCLUSIONS: The newly defined DAPratio has been demonstrated to be a metric that characterizes the target efficiency of a set of beams in robotic SRS in one single and uniformly scaled number. A DAPratio < 1 indicates Pareto efficiency. The trade-off between plan quality on the one hand and short treatment time or low total monitor units on the other hand is also represented by DAPratio.

Value of generalized equivalent uniform dose optimization in radiotherapy for chest malignant tumors / 中国辐射卫生

Objective To explore the value of generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD) optimization in radiotherapy for chest malignant tumors. Methods Sixty patients with chest malignant tumors who were treated in Center for Tumor Radiotherapy, Chizhou Municipal People’s Hospital, Anhui Province, China from October 2021 to June 2022 were enrolled; each patient underwent tumor localization with a conventional fixed computed tomography scan. The patients were divided into two groups using the same field direction and weight in the Varian Eclipse 15.6 planning system. The first group was planned using the conventional physical dose-volume objective function plus the Upper gEUD objective function, with organs at risks (OARs) optimized with the EUD values suggested by the Varian Eclipse 15.6 planning system. The second group only adopted the conventional physical dose-volume objective function for OARs optimization. The two groups were compared for the radiation doses delivered to the OARs. Results Compared with the conventional physical dose-volume objective function alone, the addition of Upper gEUD objective function resulted in no significant difference in lung V5Gy, but resulted in significant reductions in V20Gy and mean dose in the lungs; some reductions in V30Gy, V40Gy, and mean dose in the heart; and significant reductions in the maximum dose in the spinal cord. Conclusion The gEUD objective optimization can effectively protect the normal tissue in the radiotherapy for chest malignant tumors and thus is recommended in radiotherapy planning.

Effect of dwell time deviation constraint on the three-dimensional brachytherapy plans for cervical cancer / 中华放射肿瘤学杂志

Objective:To investigate the effect of dwell time deviation constraint of inverse optimization on the quality and position error robustness of three-dimensional (3D) brachytherapy plans for cervical cancer.Methods:A total of 20 patients with cervical cancer receiving 3D brachytherapy treatment in Xiangya Hospital Central South University from August 2020 to August 2021 were retrospectively selected. All plans were designed using the Eclipse treatment planning system, and the dwell time deviation constraint parameter smooth value in the system were set to 0.00, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, and 1.00, respectively. An inverse dose volume optimization algorithm was used to generate plans with various smooth values, and the optimization conditions were the same as the original clinical plans. Key dosimetric metrics and total dwell time differences were comparatively analyzed. The applicators were intentionally subjected to position errors (0.2-1.0 cm) in 6 directions (left-right, anterior-posterior, head-foot), and the effect of various smooth values on plan quality and robustness was assessed. There were 133 plans per case and 2 660 plans for 20 patients. The results were statistically analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank nonparametric test.Results:As the smooth value was increased, the modulation factor was gradually decreased and the D 2 cm3 of the bladder and rectum was increased. Plans with smooth values of 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.00 had modulation factors of 0.72±0.09, 0.63±0.08, 0.55±0.08, 0.51±0.06, respectively, lower than 0.75±0.05 of the plan with the smooth value of 0.00, and all differences were statistically significant ( P=0.004, 0.002, 0.002, 0.002). The bladder D 2 cm3 of plans with smooth values of 0.50, 0.75, 1.00 were (475.4±41.0) cGy, (483.7±46.2) cGy, and (489.0±46.8) cGy, respectively, higher than (469.8±41.8) cGy of the plan with the smooth value of 0.00, with statistically significant differences (all P=0.002). The rectum D 2 cm3 of plans with smooth values of 0.50 and 0.75 plans were (413.2±93.3) cGy and (418.6±96.4) cGy, both higher than (410.2±91.5) cGy of the plan with the smooth value of 0.00, with statistically significant differences ( P=0.006, 0.010). When positional errors were introduced, the high risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) D 90% was close for different smooth plans at most positional errors, and the differences were not statistically significant. The organs at risk D 2 cm3 of plans with the smooth value of 0.00 was lower than those of plans with other smooth values, and for the bladder and rectum, the differences were statistically significant at most positional errors (all P<0.01). Conclusions:The dwell time deviation constraint parameter exerts significant effect on the plan quality, and the smaller the value of the constraint parameter, the higher quality of the plan. The dwell time deviation constraint parameter has slight impact on the positional error robustness of dosimetric indices of targets and key organs at risk.

Application of the second derivative-based small monitor unit beam deletion optimization to CyberKnife planning of heads / 中华放射医学与防护杂志

Objective:To investigate the effects of different small monitor unit (MU) beam deletion optimization method in the CyberKnife treatment planning system on the calculated planned dose to brain tumors.Methods:A total of 17 patients with brain metastases treated in our hospital from June, 2021 to February, 2022 were selected for this study. A treatment plan was designed for each patient using the multiPlan system in the CyberKnife VSI system as the group without optimization. To improve the efficiency, the generated original plans should be optimized first by deleting some small MUs, forming an experience group and an optimization group for each patient. For the experience group, beams below 30 MU were deleted according to experience. For the optimization group, beams below the MU value calculated based on the second derivative method were deleted. Finally, the parameters of the two groups were statistically compared. The main evaluation parameters included the node number, the beam number, the total number of MUs, the estimated treatment duration, doses to 2% and 95% planning target volumes (PTV D2 and PTV D95), average dose to PTV ( Dmean), average dose to brain tissue ( Dmean-Brain), conformity index (CI), new conformity index (nCI), gradient index (GI), coverage, and the maximum doses to the brainstem and left and right lens ( Dmax-BS, Dmax-LL, and Dmax-RL), and the average doses to the dose shells 20 mm and 40 mm away from PTV (Shell20 and Shell40). Results:The two optimization method met the requirements for the prescription dose delivery to more than 98% PTV. There were statistical differences in the node number ( H = 7.97, P< 0.05) and estimated treatment duration ( H = 6.60, P < 0.05) among the group without MP optimization, the experience group, and the optimization group, with the estimated treatment duration and node number of the optimization group less than those of the group without MP optimization ( P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in other parameters among the three groups ( P > 0.05). The PTV was moderately positively correlated with the treatment duration ( r=0.79, P < 0.01) and beam number ( r=0.78, P < 0.01) of the experience group, and was also moderately positively correlated with the treatment duration ( r=0.69, P < 0.01) and beam number ( r=0.71, P < 0.01) of the optimization group. Conclusions:For the CyberKnife planning of heads, the small MU beam deletion optimization method based on the second derivative can further shorten the treatment duration while ensuring no significant differences in the distribution of doses to organs at risk and targets. Moreover, this method is more effective in optimizing the plans for a large PTV volume.

A temporo-spatial description of moving tumor and organs by the probability of presence time proportion: concept and implementation for 4D dose calculation and optimization.

Objective. The binary definition of the internal target volume (ITV) artificially separates tumor from healthy organs at motion overlapping area for dose evaluation and optimization, bringing confusion about taking partial organs as tumor or adversely. In this work, the probability of presence time (PPT) proportion of a moving anatomic voxel at a geometric voxel is defined to construct a temporo-spatial description of moving objects. The geometric overlapping of tumor and organs in 3D space is distinguished by individual residence time proportion. The dose deposition at a geometric voxel is decomposed into individual dose delivered to tumor and organs for accumulative dose calculation and optimization.Approach.A novel PPT-based plan optimization strategy is proposed to generate an optimized non-uniform dose distribution based on the temporo-spatial relationship between tumor and organs.Main results.Results from a simulation study on phantoms show that the proposed method provides promising performance for surrounding organs at risk (OAR) avoidance with a reduction of mean and maximum dose at a range of 22.6%-23.1% and 23.6%-28.3% compared with ITV-based plans under different geometric conditions, while keeping the clinical target volume dose as prescription.Significance.The PPT definition constructs a unified framework to deal with the 4D temporo-spatial distribution, accumulative dose calculation and optimization of moving tumor and organs. The advantages of the PPT-based dose calculation and optimization approach are demonstrated by simulation study with significant reduction of OARs dose level compared with conventional ITV-based plan.

Comparing biological effectiveness guided plan optimization strategies for cranial proton therapy: potential and challenges.

BACKGROUND: To introduce and compare multiple biological effectiveness guided (BG) proton plan optimization strategies minimizing variable relative biological effectiveness (RBE) induced dose burden in organs at risk (OAR) while maintaining plan quality with a constant RBE. METHODS: Dose-optimized (DOSEopt) proton pencil beam scanning reference treatment plans were generated for ten cranial patients with prescription doses ≥ 54 Gy(RBE) and ≥ 1 OAR close to the clinical target volume (CTV). For each patient, four additional BG plans were created. BG objectives minimized either proton track-ends, dose-averaged linear energy transfer (LETd), energy depositions from high-LET protons or variable RBE-weighted dose (DRBE) in adjacent serially structured OARs. Plan quality (RBE = 1.1) was assessed by CTV dose coverage and robustness (2 mm setup, 3.5% density), dose homogeneity and conformity in the planning target volumes and adherence to OAR tolerance doses. LETd, DRBE (Wedenberg model, α/ßCTV = 10 Gy, α/ßOAR = 2 Gy) and resulting normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs) for blindness and brainstem necrosis were derived. Differences between DOSEopt and BG optimized plans were assessed and statistically tested (Wilcoxon signed rank, α = 0.05). RESULTS: All plans were clinically acceptable. DOSEopt and BG optimized plans were comparable in target volume coverage, homogeneity and conformity. For recalculated DRBE in all patients, all BG plans significantly reduced near-maximum DRBE to critical OARs with differences up to 8.2 Gy(RBE) (p < 0.05). Direct DRBE optimization primarily reduced absorbed dose in OARs (average ΔDmean = 2.0 Gy; average ΔLETd,mean = 0.1 keV/µm), while the other strategies reduced LETd (average ΔDmean < 0.3 Gy; average ΔLETd,mean = 0.5 keV/µm). LET-optimizing strategies were more robust against range and setup uncertaintes for high-dose CTVs than DRBE optimization. All BG strategies reduced NTCP for brainstem necrosis and blindness on average by 47% with average and maximum reductions of 5.4 and 18.4 percentage points, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: All BG strategies reduced variable RBE-induced NTCPs to OARs. Reducing LETd in high-dose voxels may be favourable due to its adherence to current dose reporting and maintenance of clinical plan quality and the availability of reported LETd and dose levels from clinical toxicity reports after cranial proton therapy. These optimization strategies beyond dose may be a first step towards safely translating variable RBE optimization in the clinics.

Hippocampus sparing volumetric modulated arc therapy in patients with loco-regionally advanced oropharyngeal cancer.

This study aimed to assess the incidental radiation exposure of the hippocampus (HC) in locoregionally-advanced oropharyngeal cancer patients undergoing volumetric modulated arc therapy and the feasibility of HC-sparing plan optimization. The initial plans were generated without dose-volume constraints to the HC and were compared with the HC-sparing plans. The incidental Dmean_median doses to the bilateral, ipsilateral and contralateral HC were 2.9, 3.1, and 2.5 Gy in the initial plans and 1.4, 1.6, and 1.3 Gy with HC-sparing. It was feasible to reduce the HC dose with HC-sparing plan optimization without compromising target coverage and/or dose constraints to other OARs.

Low-dose CT allows for accurate proton therapy dose calculation and plan optimization.

Objective.Protons offer a more conformal dose delivery compared to photons, yet they are sensitive to anatomical changes over the course of treatment. To minimize range uncertainties due to anatomical variations, a new CT acquisition at every treatment session would be paramount to enable daily dose calculation and subsequent plan adaptation. However, the series of CT scans results in an additional accumulated patient dose. Reducing CT radiation dose and thereby decreasing the potential risk of radiation exposure to patients is desirable, however, lowering the CT dose results in a lower signal-to-noise ratio and therefore in a reduced quality image. We hypothesized that the signal-to-noise ratio provided by conventional CT protocols is higher than needed for proton dose distribution estimation. In this study, we aim to investigate the effect of CT imaging dose reduction on proton therapy dose calculations and plan optimization.Approach.To verify our hypothesis, a CT dose reduction simulation tool has been developed and validated to simulate lower-dose CT scans from an existing standard-dose scan. The simulated lower-dose CTs were then used for proton dose calculation and plan optimization and the results were compared with those of the standard-dose scan. The same strategy was adopted to investigate the effect of CT dose reduction on water equivalent thickness (WET) calculation to quantify CT noise accumulation during integration along the beam.Main results.The similarity between the dose distributions acquired from the low-dose and standard-dose CTs was evaluated by the dose-volume histogram and the 3D Gamma analysis. The results on an anthropomorphic head phantom and three patient cases indicate that CT imaging dose reduction up to 90% does not have a significant effect on proton dose calculation and plan optimization. The relative error was employed to evaluate the similarity between WET maps and was found to be less than 1% after reducing the CT imaging dose by 90%.Significance.The results suggest the possibility of using low-dose CT for proton therapy dose estimation, since the dose distributions acquired from the standard-dose and low-dose CTs are clinically equivalent.