Evaluation of PTV margin in CBCT-based online adaptive radiation therapy for gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma.

The aim of this study was to investigate planning target volume (PTV) margin in online adaptive radiation therapy (oART) for gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphomas. Four consecutive patients with gastric MALT lymphoma who received oART (30 Gy in 15 fractions) on the oART system were included in this study. One hundred and twenty cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans acquired pre- and post-treatment of 60 fractions for all patients were used to evaluate intra- and interfractional motions. Patients were instructed on breath-holding at exhalation during image acquisition. To assess the intrafraction gastric motion, different PTVs were created by isotropically extending the CTV contoured on a pre-CBCT image (CTVpre) at1 mm intervals. Intrafraction motion was defined as the amount of expansion covering the contoured CTV on post-CBCT images (CTVpost). Interfractional motion was defined as the amount of reference CTV expansion that could cover each CTVpre, as well as the evaluation of the intrafractional motion. PTV margins were estimated from the cumulative proportion of fraction covering the intra- and interfractional motions. The extent of expansion covering the CTVs in 90% of fractions was adopted as the PTV margin. The PTV margin for intrafractional gastric motion using the oART system with breath-holding was 14 mm. In contrast, the PTV margin for interfractional gastric organ motion without the oART system was 25 mm. These results indicated that the oART system can reduce the PTV margin by >10 mm. Our results could be valuable data for oART cases.

Dose conformity and falloff in single-lesion intracranial SRS with DCA and VMAT methods.

BACKGROUND: Intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) aims at achieving highly conformal dose distribution and, at the same time, attaining rapid dose falloff outside the treatment target. SRS is performed using different techniques including dynamic conformal arcs (DCA) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). PURPOSE: In this study, we compare dose conformity and falloff in DCA and VMAT plans for SRS with a single target. METHODS: To compare dose conformity in SRS plans, we employ a novel conformity index C I d e x p $C{I}_{{d}_{exp}}$ , RTOG conformity index ( C I R T O G $C{I}_{RTOG}$ ), and Riet-Paddick conformity index ( C I R P $C{I}_{RP}$ ). In addition, we use indices R 50 % $R50\% $ , V 10 G y ${V}_{10Gy}$ , and V 12 G y ${V}_{12Gy}$ to evaluate dose falloff. For each of the considered 118 cases of SRS, two plans were created using DCA and VMAT. A two-tailed Student's t-test was used to evaluate the difference between the employed indices for the DCA and VMAT plans. RESULTS: The studied VMAT plans were characterized by higher dose conformity than the DCA plans. The differences between the conformity indices for the DCA plans and VMAT plans were statistically significant. The DCA plans had a smaller number of monitor units (MUs) and smaller indices R50%, V10 Gy, and V12 Gy than the VMAT plans. However, the differences between R50%, V10 Gy, and V12 Gy for the DCA and VMAT plans were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Although the studied VMAT plans had higher dose conformity, they also had larger MUs than the DCA plans. In terms of dose falloff characterized by parameters R50%, V10 Gy, and V12 Gy, DCA serves as a reasonable alternative to VMAT in the case of a single brain metastasis.

Malignant transformation of primary ameloblastoma of skull: case report and review of current literature.

Background: Since 1964, there has been a scarcity of reported cases of primary ameloblastoma (AM) or ameloblastic carcinoma (AMCa) of the skull. The clinical presentation and distinctive features of this uncommon condition at specific anatomical sites remain unclear. We report a case of malignant transformation of a primary AM of the skull situated in the frontal-temporal-parietal region and highlight its similarities to other cases reported in the literature. Clinical presentation: A 53-year-old female patient presented with a 20-day history of headaches and bilateral lower limb weakness for 10 days. Physical examination revealed slow and unsteady gait. An occupying lesion was observed in the right frontal-temporal-parietal region of the skull on the Cranial imaging. A right cranial bone tumor margin expansion resection was performed. The patient's motor functions recovered normally after surgery. Postoperative imaging examinations showed10 tumor resection. Follow-up imaging examinations showed tumor recurrence. The patient underwent resection of the recurrent tumor. Postoperative pathological analysis revealed malignant transformation of the AM.Follow-up imaging examinations showed tumor recurrence again. The patient was admitted for stereotactic radiotherapy. Follow-up imaging examinations demonstrated no evidence of tumor recurrence and subsequent chest CT revealed no signs of metastasis. Conclusion: Primary AM or AMCa of the skull is increasingly being described in the literature, but detailed reports on the malignant transformation of primary AM of the skull are lacking. The pathogenesis of this condition remains unclear. Aggressive treatment and close follow-up may be crucial for preventing disease recurrence and malignant transformation.

Patient Cranial Angle and Intrafractional Stability in CyberKnife Robotic Radiosurgery: A Retrospective Analysis.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate whether variations in cranial angles and treatment accuracy during CyberKnife robotic radiosurgery necessitate adjustment of the margins of the planning target volume. Patients and Methods: Data from 66 patients receiving CyberKnife treatment for brain tumors were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were immobilized using a thermoplastic mask and headrest. The cranial angle was measured on planning CT and patients were divided into 2 groups: ≤10° (Group A) and >10° (Group B). Intrafractional motion was recorded using the CyberKnife tracking system over 50 min. Translational and rotational errors were compared between groups, and planning target volume margins were calculated. Results: In Group A, significant translational error differences were found along with the X-axis over time (P < .02). In Group B, significant differences occurred along with the Z-axis (P < .03). No significant rotational or 3-dimensional vector differences were found in either group. Group A had significantly lower Y-axis (P < .045) and roll axis (P < .005) errors compared to Group B. Estimated planning target volume margins in Group A were 0.56 mm (X), 0.46 mm (Y), and 0.47 mm (Z). In Group B, margins were 0.62 mm (X), 0.48 mm (Y), and 0.46 mm (Z). Margins covering 95% of intrafraction motion were 0.49 to 0.50 mm (X, Y, Z) and 0.69 mm (3-dimensional vector) for Group A, and 0.48 to 0.60 mm and 0.79 mm for Group B. With a 1-mm margin, complete coverage was achieved in Group A while 2.1% of vectors in Group B exceeded 1 mm. Conclusion: Adjusting cranial angle to ≤10° during thermoplastic mask molding provided better or similar intrafractional stability compared to >10°.

Analysis of Individualized Silicone Rubber Bolus Using Fan Beam Computed Tomography in Postmastectomy Radiotherapy: A Dosimetric Evaluation and Skin Acute Radiation Dermatitis Survey.

Objective: To investigate the dosimetric effects of using individualized silicone rubber (SR) bolus on the target area and organs at risk (OARs) during postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT), as well as evaluate skin acute radiation dermatitis (ARD). Methods: A retrospective study was performed on 30 patients with breast cancer. Each patient was prepared with an individualized SR bolus of 3 mm thickness. Fan-beam computed tomography (FBCT) was performed at the first and second fractions, and then once a week for a total of 5 times. Dosimetric metrics such as homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), skin dose (SD), and OARs including the heart, lungs, and spinal cord were compared between the original plan and the FBCTs. The acute side effects were recorded. Results: In targets' dosimetric metrics, there were no significant differences in Dmean and V105% between planning computed tomography (CT) and actual treatments (P > .05), while the differences in D95%, V95%, HI, and CI were statistically significant (P < .05). In OARs, there were no significant differences between the Dmean, V5, and V20 of the affected lung, V5 of the heart and Dmax of the spinal cord (P > .05) except the V30 of affected lung, which was slightly lower than the planning CT (P < .05). In SD, both Dmax and Dmean in actual treatments were increased than plan A, and the difference was statistically significant (P < .05), while the skin-V20 and skin-V30 has no difference. Among the 30 patients, only one patient had no skin ARD, and 5 patients developed ARD of grade 2, while the remaining 24 patients were grade 1. Conclusion: The OR bolus showed good anastomoses and high interfraction reproducibility with the chest wall, and did not cause deformation during irradiation. It ensured accurate dose delivery of the target and OARs during the treatment, which may increase SD by over 101%. In this study, no cases of grade 3 skin ARD were observed. However, the potential of using OR bolus to reduce grade 1 and 2 skin ARD warrants further investigation with a larger sample size.

A retrospective study on improving the accuracy of radiotherapy for patients with breast cancer with lymph node metastasis using Styrofoam.

BACKGROUND: To retrospectively analyze the accuracy of radiotherapy using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), Styrofoam fixation, and breast bracket fixation in the chest wall target area and supraclavicular lymphatic drainage area (supraclavicular target area) of patients with breast cancer.and compare the setting efficiency and comfort satisfaction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 65 patients with postoperative lymphatic metastasis of breast cancer, including 36 cases of Styrofoam fixation and 29 cases of breast bracket fixation, were recruited from March 2021 to August 2022 and retrospectively analyzed. All the patients underwent CBCT scans weekly, and the setup errors of the chest wall and supraclavicular target volume were compared and recorded. The planning target volume (PTV) margins of the two groups were calculated using the correlation MPTV = 2.5Σ + 0.7σ. The setup time and comfort satisfaction scores of the two groups were recorded and analyzed. The correlations among errors in each direction were analyzed using the Pearson correlation analysis. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the left-right direction (X) axis of the chest wall target area between the Styrofoam and breast bracket groups (1.59 ± 1.47 mm vs. 2.05 ± 1.64 mm, P = 0.012). There were statistical differences in the ventrodorsal direction (Z) and bed angle of the supraclavicular target area, the data were (1.36 ± 1.27 mm vs. 1.75 ± 1.55 mm, P = 0.046; 0.47 ± 0.47° vs. 0.66 ± 0.59°, P = 0.006, respectively). In the X, Y, and Z directions, the respective PTV margins of the two groups in the chest wall target area were 5.01 mm, 5.99 mm, and 5.47 mm in the Styrofoam group, while those in the breast bracket group were 6.10 mm, 6.34 mm, and 6.10 mm, respectively. Moreover, the PTV margins of the supraclavicular target in the three directions were 3.69 mm, 3.86 mm, and 4.28 mm in the Styrofoam group, while those in the breast bracket group were 3.99 mm, 3.72 mm, and 5.45 mm, respectively. The setup time of the two groups was 3.4 ± 1.1 min and 5.5 ± 3.1 min (P = 0.007). The subjective comfort satisfaction scores of the two groups were 27.50 ± 1.24 and 25.44 ± 1.23 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The application of Styrofoam fixation in radiotherapy of breast cancer in the supraclavicular lymph node area has several advantages as compared to breast bracket fixation, including higher positioning accuracy, smaller external expansion boundary, improved work efficiency, and patients' comfort, which might provide a reference for clinical work.

Impact of technological advances in treatment planning, image guidance, and treatment delivery on target margin design for prostate cancer radiotherapy: an updated review.

Recent innovations in image guidance, treatment delivery, and adaptive radiotherapy (RT) have created a new paradigm for planning target volume (PTV) margin design for patients with prostate cancer. We performed a review of the recent literature on PTV margin selection and design for intact prostate RT, excluding post-operative RT, brachytherapy, and proton therapy. Our review describes the increased focus on prostate and seminal vesicles as heterogenous deforming structures with further emergence of intra-prostatic GTV boost and concurrent pelvic lymph node treatment. To capture recent innovations, we highlight the evolution in cone beam CT guidance, and increasing use of MRI for improved target delineation and image registration and supporting online adaptive RT. Moreover, we summarize new and evolving image-guidance treatment platforms as well as recent reports of novel immobilization strategies and motion tracking. Our report also captures recent implementations of artificial intelligence to support image guidance and adaptive RT. To characterize the clinical impact of PTV margin changes via model-based risk estimates and clinical trials, we highlight recent high impact reports. Our report focusses on topics in the context of PTV margins but also showcase studies attempting to move beyond the PTV margin recipes with robust optimization and probabilistic planning approaches. Although guidelines exist for target margins conventional using CT-based image guidance, further validation is required to understand the optimal margins for online adaptation either alone or combined with real-time motion compensation to minimize systematic and random uncertainties in the treatment of patients with prostate cancer.

Toward an improved assessment of dose conformity in radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of dose conformity is important to ensure minimum dose to normal tissue and sufficient dose coverage of the planning target volume (PTV). The existing conformity indices depend on the PTV volume and do not differentiate between two different scenarios: overdosing normal tissue and underdosing PTV. PURPOSE: In this study, we introduce a novel index to assess conformity of dose distributions in radiotherapy. METHODS: The suggested conformity index C I d e x p $C{I_{{d_{exp}}}}$ is defined by the ratio of the volume representing actual "non-conformity" of the planned dose and the volume representing acceptable "non-conformity." The latter volume is produced by expanding the PTV. If both the average distance ( d ¯ $\overline d $ ) between the reference isodose surface and planning target volume and arbitrarily selected PTV expansion margin ( d e x p ${d_{exp}}$ ) are much smaller than the size of the PTV, C I d e x p $C{I_{{d_{exp}}}}$ approximately equals the ratio d ¯ d e x p $\dfrac{{\bar d}}{{{d_{exp}}}}$ . In this work, C I d e x p $C{I_{{d_{exp}}}}$ was utilized to analyze 90 cases of brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiation therapy (SRS) and 102 cases of lung cancer treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). RESULTS: For d e x p ${d_{exp}}$  = 0.1 cm, all considered SRS treatment plans were characterized by C I d e x p < 1 $C{I_{{d_{exp}}}} < 1$ while 2 out of 102 SBRT plans had C I d e x p > 1 $C{I_{{d_{exp}}}} > 1$ . The average values of C I d e x p $C{I_{{d_{exp}}}}$ for SRS and SBRT plans were 0.31 and 0.43, respectively. For d e x p ${d_{exp}}$  = 0.2 cm, all studied treatment plans had C I d e x p < 1 $C{I_{{d_{exp}}}} < 1$ , and the average values of C I d e x p $C{I_{{d_{exp}}}}$ for SRS and SBRT plans were 0.15 and 0.25, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The suggested conformity index C I d e x p $C{I_{{d_{exp}}}}$ varies less with PTV volume than the RTOG and Riet-Paddick indices frequently used for evaluation of dose conformity. In addition, C I d e x p $C{I_{{d_{exp}}}}$ can be expressed as a sum of two terms which describe "over-coverage" and "under-coverage" of the treatment target. The results confirm that C I d e x p $C{I_{{d_{exp}}}}$ can be used for evaluation of dose conformity in SRS and SBRT.

Empowering Vision Transformer by Network Hyper-Parameter Selection for Whole Pelvis Prostate Planning Target Volume Auto-Segmentation.

U-Net, based on a deep convolutional network (CNN), has been clinically used to auto-segment normal organs, while still being limited to the planning target volume (PTV) segmentation. This work aims to address the problems in two aspects: 1) apply one of the newest network architectures such as vision transformers other than the CNN-based networks, and 2) find an appropriate combination of network hyper-parameters with reference to recently proposed nnU-Net ("no-new-Net"). VT U-Net was adopted for auto-segmenting the whole pelvis prostate PTV as it consisted of fully transformer architecture. The upgraded version (v.2) applied the nnU-Net-like hyper-parameter optimizations, which did not fully cover the transformer-oriented hyper-parameters. Thus, we tried to find a suitable combination of two key hyper-parameters (patch size and embedded dimension) for 140 CT scans throughout 4-fold cross validation. The VT U-Net v.2 with hyper-parameter tuning yielded the highest dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 82.5 and the lowest 95% Haussdorff distance (HD95) of 3.5 on average among the seven recently proposed deep learning networks. Importantly, the nnU-Net with hyper-parameter optimization achieved competitive performance, although this was based on the convolution layers. The network hyper-parameter tuning was demonstrated to be necessary even for the newly developed architecture of vision transformers.

Evaluation of PTV margins and plan robustness for single isocentre multiple target stereotactic radiosurgery.

PURPOSE: Robustness to residual setup errors and linac delivery errors of BrainLab Elements single-isocentre-multiple-target stereotactic radiosurgery was evaluated. METHODS: Residual setup errors of 13 patients were evaluated. Linac delivery error was quantified through multi-metastases-Winston-Lutz measurements. PTV margins were calculated using the van Herk recipe. Patient scans were translated and rotated by the median and 95th percentile of the combined uncertainties, and plans were recalculated subsequently. Previous patients' plans were then replanned with the derived margins, effects on GTV coverage and normal brain doses were assessed. RESULTS: Mean (±stdev) coverage of all targets in the original plans were 99.4% (±0.9%) and 98.9% (±1.0%) for 1 and 3-fraction patients respectively. Median geometrical errors did not result in significant differences. A statistically significant reduction in coverage to 91.4% (±10.4%) and 93.0% (±9.6%) was seen under 95th percentile errors. Applying the derived optimal margin of 0.5 mm resulted in 78% of the GTVs retaining a coverage of 98% or above even in the presence of 95th percentile errors, compared to only 30% if no margins were applied. Replanning with margins also caused no significant increase to local normal brain doses, however global dose increases varied according to the number of metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Plans were shown to be robust to average geometrical uncertainties despite targets having no margins, however occurrence of GTV under-coverage increased under 95th percentile scenarios. The margin was proven to substantially improve the target dose coverage with limited change to local normal brain doses, although not all sources of geometrical uncertainty were considered.

An empirical approach to the definition of the target margins in eye radiosurgery.

INTRODUCTION: A system for stabilizing and monitoring eye movements during LINAC-based photon beam one single fraction stereotactic radiotherapy was developed at our Institution. This study aimed to describe the feasibility and the efficacy of our noninvasive optical localization system that was developed, tested, and applied in 20 patients treated for uveal melanoma. METHODS: Our system consisted of a customized thermoplastic mask to immobilize the head, a gaze fixation LED, and a digital micro-camera. The localization procedure, which required the active collaboration of the patient, served to monitor the eye movements during all phases of the treatment, starting from the planning computed tomography up to the administration of radiotherapy, and allowed the operators to suspend the procedure and to interact with the patient in case of large movements of the pupil. RESULTS: Twenty patients were treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (27 Gy in one fraction) for primary uveal melanoma. All patients showed a good tolerance to the treatment; until now, all patients were in local control during the follow up and one died for distant progression 6 months after radiosurgery. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that this noninvasive technique, based on eye position control, is appropriate and can contribute to the success of LINAC-based stereotactic radiotherapy. A millimetric safety margin to the clinical target volume was adequate to take account for the organ movement. All patients treated till now showed a good local control; failures in the disease control were due to metastatic spread.

A prospective study to assess and quantify the setup errors with cone-beam computed tomography in head-and-neck cancer image-guided radiotherapy treatment.

Introduction: This study was done to quantify the translational setup errors with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in the image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) treatment of head-and-neck cancer (HNC) patients. Aims: The objective was to quantify the setup errors by CBCT. Methodology: One hundred patients of HNC were enrolled from March 2020 to March 2021 for IGRT treatment. Pretreatment kV-CBCT images were obtained at the first 3 days of irradiations, and setup error corrections were done in the mediolateral (ML), superior-inferior (SI), and anterior-posterior (AP) directions. Subsequently, a weekly kV-CBCT was repeated for whole duration of radiotherapy for the next 6-7 weeks. Adequacy of planning target volume (PTV) margins was assessed by van Herk's formula. Results: Total 630 CBCT scans of 100 patients were analyzed. Setup errors greater than 3 mm and 5 mm were seen in 11.4% and 0.31% of the patients, respectively. Systematic errors and random errors before correction in ML, SI, and AP directions were 0.10 cm, 0.11 cm, and 0.12 cm and 0.24 cm, 0.20 cm, and 0.21 cm, respectively. Systematic errors and random errors after correction in ML, SI, and AP directions were 0.06 cm, 0.07 cm, and 0.07 cm and 0.13 cm, 0.10 cm, and 0.12 cm, respectively. Conclusion: CBCT at the first 3 fractions and then weekly during radiotherapy is effective to detect the setup errors. An isotropic PTV margin of 5 mm over clinical target volume is safe to account for setup errors, however, in the case of close organ at risk, or with IGRT, a PTV margin of 3 mm can be considered.

Rotational Set Up Uncertainly in Non-6D Couch and its Effects in Clinical Target Volume- Planning Target Volume Margin Calculation for Different Sites.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to estimate and incorporate rotational error to translational error for clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) margin calculations for non-6D couch. Materials and Methods: The study involved cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of the patients who already had treatment in Varian Trilogy Clinac. The different sites studied were brain (70 patients, 406 CBCT images), head and neck (72 patients, 356 CBCT images), pelvis (83 patients, 606 CBCT images), and breast (45 patients, 163 CBCT images). Rotational and translational patient shifts were measured with the help of Varian eclipse offline review. The rotational shift introduces translational shift as it resolved along craniocaudal and mediolateral directions. Both rotational and translational error follow normal distribution and their respective errors were used to calculate CTV-PTV margin using van Herk model. Results: Rotational effect on CTV-PTV margin contribution increases with increase in size of CTV. It also increases with increase in distance between center of mass of CTV and isocenter. These margins were more pronounce in single isocenter supraclavicular fossa-Tangential Breast plans. Conclusions: There is always rotational error in all sites and it causes shift and rotation of the target. Rotational contribution to the CTV-PTV margin depends upon geometric center of CTV and isocenter distance and also on size of CTV. CTV-PTV margins should incorporate rotational error along with transitional error.

Assessing setup errors and shifting margins for planning target volume in head, neck, and breast cancer.

Accurately calculating setup errors is crucial in ensuring quality assurance for patients undergoing radiation therapy treatment. This cross-sectional study aimed to determine the systematic, random, and planning target volume (PTV) margin errors for patients with head and neck cancer (n=48) and breast cancer (n=50). The treatment setup was performed using electronic portal imaging (EPIDs) and irradiated using Elekta linac. The errors were calculated using the van Herk formula. The systematic error for the head and neck was 0.89, 0.43, and 1.49 mm on the x, y, and z-axis, respectively, and 0.39, 0.74, 0.38 for the breast cases. The random error was 0.82, 0.68, 0.94 mm for the head and neck and 0.66, 0.72, 0.79 mm for the breast. The PTV margin shifting error for the head and neck were 2.79, 1.55, and 4.38 mm, while it was 1.43, 2.35, and 1.50 mm for the breast. The setup errors varied according to the tumor location. The study highlights the potential benefits of using EPIDs for reducing uncertainties in setup verification procedures.

Angle of concavity in planning target volume can be adopted as selection criteria for intensity-modulated radiation therapy or three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy technique in brain tumors.

Introduction: With innovation of medical imaging, radiotherapy attempts to conform the high dose region to the planning target volume (PTV). The present work aimed to assess the angle of concavity in PTV can be adopted as selection criteria for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) technique in Brain tumors. Materials and Methods: Thirty previously irradiated patients with brain tumors were replanned with both 3DCRT and IMRT technique. Angle of concavity (dip) in the PTV near the organs at risk was measured in the contoured structure set images of each patient. These cases were divided into three groups where angles were 0°, >120° and <120°. Dose of 60 Gy/30# was fixed. Results: In Group 1, the IMRT plan had better TV95% as compared to 3DCRT respectively with significant P value (P = 0.002). Mean of conformity index (CI) and Homogeneity Index (HI) were comparable. For Group 2 (angle >120°), the IMRT plan had better TV95% as compared to 3DCRT respectively with a significant P value (P = 0.021). HI and CI were not significant. For Group 3 (<120°), IMRT plan had better TV95% as compared to 3DCRT respectively with a significant P value (P = 0.001). HI and CI were better in IMRT arm with significant P value. Conclusion: The results from this study showed that the angle of concavity can be considered as an additional objective tool for selection criteria whether tumor can be treated with IMRT or 3DCRT. Tumors where angle of concavity was <120°, HI and CI provided more uniformity and conformity of dose distribution inside PTV with significant P values.

Impact of rectal gas on the planning target volume margin for pelvic bone and prostate matching in prostate cancer patients receiving volumetric-modulated arc therapy.

We performed daily cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) to determine the impact of rectal gas on the movements of prostate and seminal vesicles (SVs). We aimed to determine the relationship between planning target volume (PTV) margins and rectal gas. In 30 treatments of 15 prostate cancer patients, excessive rectal gas was removed and CBCT images were analyzed. Image registration between planning CT and daily CBCT images before and after rectal gas removal was performed for pelvic bone and prostate matching. The couch movement distance between each matching was considered the prostate movement. In addition, we measured SV tip movement between each matching. The anterior-posterior movement of the prostate before rectal gas removal (3.1 ± 2.9 mm) was significantly greater than that after rectal gas removal (1.2 ± 1.2 mm; p < 0.01). The left-right and superior-inferior movements were similar regardless of the presence or absence of rectal gas. The SV movement distances before and after rectal gas removal were 11.0 ± 5.8 mm and 4.6 ± 3.8 mm, respectively (p < 0.01), in pelvic bone matching, and 8.0 ± 4.2 mm and 3.8 ± 3.2 mm, respectively (p < 0.01), in prostate matching. After rectal gas removal, the SV position did not differ significantly between each matching. In 26 of the 30 treatments, SV movement distance in the presence of rectal gas was >6 mm, which is the minimum PTV margin at our institution. In comparison, after rectal gas removal and prostate matching, only 6 treatments demonstrated an SV movement distance of >6 mm. In the presence of rectal gas, the SVs require greater PTV margins than the prostate. Rectal gas removal should be considered if the movement distance on prostate matching is greater than the minimum PTV margin at treating institution.

Effectiveness of 6D couch with daily cone beam computed tomography in reducing PTV margins for glioblastoma multiforme.

Objectives: Image-guided radiotherapy maximizes therapeutic index of brain irradiation by reducing setup errors during treatment. The aim of study was to analyze setup errors in the radiation treatment of glioblastoma multiforme and if decrease in planning target volume (PTV), margin is feasible using daily cone beam CT (CBCT) and 6D couch correction. Materials and Methods: Twenty-one patients (630 fractions of radiotherapy) were studied in which corrections were made in 6° of freedom. We determined setup errors, impact of setup errors of initial three fractions CBCT versus rest of the treatment with daily CBCT, and mean difference in setup errors with or without application of 6D couch and volumetric benefit of reduction of PTV margin from 0.5 cm to 0.3 cm. Results: The mean shift in the conventional directions, namely, vertical, longitudinal, and lateral was 0.17 cm, 0.19 cm, and 0.11 cm. There was significant change in vertical shift when first three fractions were compared with rest of the treatment with daily CBCT. When the effect of 6D couch was nullified, all directions showed increased error with longitudinal shift being significant. The number of setup errors of magnitude >0.3 cm was more significant when only conventional shifts were applied as compared with 6D couch. There was significant decrease in volume of brain parenchyma irradiated when margin of PTV was reduced from 0.5 cm to 0.3 cm. Conclusion: Daily CBCT along with 6D couch correction can reduce setup error which allows reduction in PTV margin during radiotherapy planning in turn improving the therapeutic index.

Comparison of stereotactic body radiation therapy versus surgery for multiple primary lung cancers after prior radical resection: A multicenter retrospective study.

Background: Patients who previously underwent surgical resection of initial primary lung cancer are at a high risk of developing multiple primary lung cancers (MPLCs). The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety between stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and surgery for MPLCs patients after prior radical resection for the first lung cancers. Methods: In this multicenter retrospective study, eligible MPLC patients with tumor diameter of 5.0 cm or less at N0M0 who underwent SBRT or reoperation between January 2013 and August 2020 were enrolled. The primary endpoint was the 3-year locoregional recurrence and treatment-related toxicity. Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate survival rates. The χ2 test was adapted to assess the difference of categorical variables between the two subgroup patients. Results: A total of 203 (73 in the SBRT group and 130 in the surgery group) patients from three academic cancer centers were evaluated with a median follow-up of 38.3 months. The cumulative 1-, 2-, and 3-year incidences of locoregional recurrence were 5.6 %, 7.0 % and 13.1 % in the SBRT group versus 3.2 %, 4.8 % and 7.4 % in the surgery group, respectively [hazard ratio (HR), 1.97; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.74-5.24; P = 0.14]. The cancer-specific survival rates were 95.9 %, 94.5 % and 88.1 % versus 96.9 %, 94.6 % and 93.8 % in the SBRT and surgery groups respectively (HR, 1.72; 95 % CI, 0.67-4.44; P = 0.23). In the SBRT group, two patients (2.7 %) suffered from grade 3 radiation pneumonitis, while in the surgery group, grade 3 complications occurred in four (3.1 %) patients, and four cases were expired due to pneumonia or pulmonary heart disease within 90 days after surgery. Conclusions: SBRT is an effective therapeutic option with limited toxicity compared to surgery for patients with MPLCs after prior radical surgical resection, and it could be considered as an alternative treatment for those patients.

Dynamic tumor-tracking stereotactic body radiotherapy with real-time monitoring of liver tumors using a gimbal-mounted linac: A multi-institutional phase II study.

Background and purpose: This prospective multicenter phase II study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of dynamic tumor tracking (DTT) stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with real-time monitoring of liver tumors using a gimbal-mounted system. Materials and methods: Patients with < 4 primary or metastatic liver tumors with diameters ≤ 50 mm and expected to have a respiratory motion of ≥ 10 mm were eligible. The prescribed dose was 40 Gy in five fractions. The primary endpoint was local control (LC) at 2 years. The secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), treatment-related toxicity, and tracking accuracy. Results: Between September 2015 and March 2019, 48 patients (48 lesions) with a median age of 74 years were enrolled from four institutions. Of these, 39 were diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma and nine with metastatic liver cancer. The median tumor diameter was 17.5 mm. DTT-SBRT was successfully performed in all patients; the median treatment time was 28 min/fraction. The median follow-up period was 36.5 months. The 2-year LC, OS, and PFS rates were 98.0 %, 88.8 %, and 55.1 %, respectively. Disease progression was observed in 33 (68.8 %) patients. One patient (0.2 %) had local recurrence, 31 (64.6 %) developed new hepatic lesions outside the irradiation field, and nine (18.8 %) had distant metastases (including overlap). Grade 3 late adverse events were observed in seven patients (14.5 %). No grade 4 or 5 treatment-related toxicity was observed. The median tracking accuracy was 2.9 mm. Conclusion: Employing DTT-SBRT to treat liver tumors results in excellent LC with acceptable adverse-event incidence.

Evaluation of intrafractional prostate displacement during prostate radiotherapy using real-time ultrasound system.

Transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) is an image-guided radiotherapy system used for tracking intrafraction prostate displacements in real time. The objectives of this study are to evaluate intrafraction prostate displacements and derive planning target volume (PTV) margins for prostate radiotherapy at our institution. The ultrasound (US) data of nine prostate cancer patients referred for VMAT radiotherapy was retrieved. Prior to beam on, patient position was set up with the US probe positioned transperineally with the aid of reference images (fused US and computed tomography images). In each fraction, prostate displacements in three directions [superior/inferior (SI), left/right (LR) and anterior/posterior (AP)] were recorded. PTV margins were determined using Van Herk's formula. To assess the prostate displacement time trend, continuous displacement data were plotted in 30-s intervals for eight minutes. The intrafraction prostate monitoring found a population mean setup error (Mp) of 0.8, 0.1, - 1.7 mm, a systematic error of (∑p) 0.7, 0.4, 0.9 mm and random error (σp) of 0.2, 0.1, 0.3 mm in SI, LR and AP directions, respectively. The PTV margin was found to be the largest in the AP direction at 2.5 mm compared with 1.9 mm and 1.1 mm for SI and LR directions, respectively. The PTV margin allowed for prostate radiotherapy at our institution was 2.5 mm in all directions. The prostate displacement time trend showed an increase in intrafraction displacements, with most patients were observed to have strong positive correlation between time and intrafraction prostate displacements in SI direction. TPUS is feasible for monitoring intrafraction displacement of the prostate and may facilitate PTV margin generation to account for such displacements during radiotherapy.