Isolated Malignant Pleural Effusion in a Child: Unusual Presentation of Acute Leukemia.

Pleural effusion in the pediatric population is an abnormal pathology characterized by the accumulation of fluids between the parietal and visceral pleura. The etiology of this excessive fluid accumulation can be attributed to both infectious and non-infectious factors. Notably, Streptococcus pneumoniae stands out as the predominant infectious agent responsible for this condition. Non-infectious causative factors encompass hematolymphoid malignancies, congestive heart failure, hemothorax, hypoalbuminemia, and iatrogenic causes. Among the hematolymphoid malignancies, lymphoma emerges as the most prevalent malignancy associated with pleural effusion. It is followed by T-cell lymphoblastic leukemia, germ cell tumor, neurogenic tumor, chest wall and pulmonary malignancy, carcinoid tumor, pleuro-pulmonary blastoma, and Askin's tumor, among others. Malignant pleural effusion is predominantly linked to T-cell lymphoblastic malignancies. In the context of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), cases where T-cell presentation is accompanied by leukemic pleural effusion are commonly associated with either a mediastinal mass or significant lymphadenopathy. Here, we describe a case of a four-year-old male child who exhibited a brief history of febrile illness. Notably, this case was characterized by isolated pleural effusion, devoid of any mediastinal mass or lymphadenopathy. Pathological investigations of pleural fluid analysis revealed the presence of malignant cells, facilitating an expedited diagnosis.

The yield of malignancy for early fixation versus routine fixation of Pleural fluid samples

Background@#The etiology of pleural effusion remains unclear in nearly 20% of cases. One way to diagnose malignancy is by doing pleural fluid cytology. There are factors that influence the yield of pleural fluid cytology and one of them is appropriate and timely fixation of samples. Currently, there is no local consensus regarding the timing with which the specimen should be fixed.@*Objective@#The study aims to compare the yield of malignancy between early fixation versus usual fixation of pleural fluid samples, meaning there is no set time for fixation to be done.@*Methodology@#The study employed a prospective cross-sectional research design. All patients with pleural effusion who fulfilled the criteria set by the study were included. Two sets of pleural fluid samples were collected amounting to 20cc each. First sample was assigned as Bottle #1 and placed immediately with fixative while the second sample was assigned as Bottle #2. Bottle #2 underwent routine fixation which follows no fixed or standard time of fixation. The time difference between the fixation of two sample groups greatly varied with Bottle #1 fixed immediately right after collection while Bottle#2 depends on the time it will be processed by the laboratory personnel. Both samples were submitted for cell block and cell cytology reading.@*Results@#Characteristics of the 55 patients included in the study showed age group range from 41 to 65 years of age, with 27 male and 28 female patients. Only one third had history of smoking. There were 21.82% who had family history of cancer and with and suspicious mass on chest radiograph. Out of 55 patients, 29 patients had history of previous diagnosis of cancer, 23 had recurrent pleural effusion, and 28 had chest radiograph with suspicious nodules. Based on gross appearance, there were 20 serous and 21 sanguineous pleural fluid noted. Mean cell count was high (1,115.50 ± 741.02) with lymphocytic predominance (82.56 ± 24.46). Elevated protein concentration (5,388.25 ± 8,230.46) and LDH (484.17 ± 248.72) were noted. Glucose (8.78 ± 6.68 mmol/L) was low. There were 21 patients who had high WBC, 24 with high protein and 16 with elevated LDH. There were 3 patients who were positive for AFB and none for KOH. Comparative analysis showed that the pleural fluid samples assigned to the routinely fixed group which were handed to the nurse after thoracentesis, then forwarded to the laboratory through a ward laboratory aide or patient watcherfor fixation with with 95% alcoholby thelaboratory personnel significantly had a longer duration of 406.62 minutes as compared to immediately fixed at 12.27 minutes (P<0.01). For diagnosis of malignancy, significantly more cases were diagnosed in the immediately fixed group with 36.36% cases versus 18.18% (p=0.016).@*Conclusion@#Among patients with suspected malignant pleural effusions, early fixation of pleural fluid samples resulted in higher histopathology yields as compared to those fixed after going through the routine fixation.

Pleural Involvement in IgG4-Related Disease: Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Diagnostic work-up of IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) pleural involvement is a complex task, as there is a broad spectrum of differential diagnoses to consider. We report the case of a patient presenting with relapsing pleural effusion, discussing the main challenges for achievement of a definite diagnosis. A 63-year-old man was admitted for pleural effusion prevalent on the ride side, initially labeled as idiopathic non-specific pleuritis, based on tissue evaluation after a medical thoracoscopy. He was started on steroids with initial improvement, but a later CT scan showed a relapse of pleural effusion associated with diffuse pleural thickening; a subsequent surgical pleural biopsy revealed features suggestive for IgG4-RD, with a marked increase of IgG4 positive plasma cells. High IgG4 serum levels were also found. The present case underlines the importance of increasing awareness of this potential condition among physicians in order to properly guide the diagnostic work-up, as it is likely that IgG4-RD accounts for a proportion of patients with pleural effusions, labeled as idiopathic. In particular, in patients with unexplained pleural effusion, IgG4-RD should be included among differential diagnoses when lymphoplasmacytic infiltration is observed, and a multidisciplinary interaction between clinicians and pathologists appears crucial for an accurate diagnosis and an appropriate management.

Diagnostics in Pleural Disease.

Pleural disease diagnostics represent a sprawling topic that has enjoyed a renaissance in recent years from humble beginnings. Whilst pleural patients are heterogeneous as a population and in the aetiology of the disease with which they present, we provide an overview of the typical diagnostic approach. Pleural fluid analysis is the cornerstone of the diagnostic pathway; however, it has many shortcomings. Strong cases have been made for more invasive upfront investigations, including image-guided biopsies or local anaesthetic thoracoscopy, in selected populations. Imaging can guide the diagnostic process as well as act as a vehicle to facilitate therapies, and this is never truer than with the recent advances in thoracic ultrasound.

[Thoracentesis in Primary Care]. / Toracocentesis en Atención Primaria.

Thoracentesis is a simple test with few complications that provides relevant information in the diagnosis of a pleural effusion, through a correct interpretation of the pleural fluid analysis. An interesting initiative would be to incorporate this technique by those Primary Care teams that treat serious and complex patients, with difficulties in moving to specialised centres far from their homes. In this context, a good knowledge of the diagnostic possibilities offered by the pleural fluid analysis could be very useful in the hands of well trained staff to establish the aetiology of a pleural effusion and be able to initiate, as quickly as possible, its treatment. This article aims to contribute to this, by suggesting guidelines on how a simple technique can provide relevant information in order to determine the aetiology of pleural effusion, and which could be implemented within a given Primary Care framework.

An unusual case of chylothorax.

Pleural effusions occur in up to 70% of cases of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). However, MPM rarely presents as a chylous effusion making it a diagnostic challenge. There are only six reported cases to date. Most cases of chylothoraces due to malignancy are due to lymphoma or bronchogenic carcinoma. We report an interesting case of MPM in a 75-year-old man who presented with recurrent chylothorax. He reported a four-month history of dyspnea and chest discomfort. Chest x-ray revealed a pleural effusion. Pleural fluid analysis was consistent with a chylothorax. Pleural fluid cytology was negative for malignancy. Computed tomography of the chest showed pleural calcifications, mediastinal adenopathy and left lung infiltrate. A fine needle aspirate of the lymph node and transbronchial biopsy specimen (TBBX) of the left lung infiltrate showed extensive reactive appearing mesothelial cells but none that appeared malignant. A video assisted thoracoscopic surgery was suggested but the patient declined. He returned 3 months later with recurrent pleural effusion and worsening airspace disease. Thoracentesis revealed a chylothorax again. Repeat analysis of TBBX and lymph node specimens showed extensive reactive appearing mesothelial cells. Due to concern for MPM, ancillary testing was obtained - loss of BRCA1 associated protein (BAP-1) and CDKN2A/p16 gene deletion. BAP1 staining was lost in the mesothelial cells supporting MPM. This case highlights a rare cause of MPM presenting as a chylous effusion. In a patient with an unknown etiology of chylothorax, MPM must remain in the differential.

The use of light's criteria in hospitalized children with a pleural effusion of unknown etiology.

OBJECTIVE: Pleural effusions are common in pediatrics. When the etiology of a pleural effusion remains unknown, adult literature recommends the use of Light's criteria to differentiate a transudate from an exudate. Pediatricians may rely on adult literature for the diagnostic management of pleural effusions as Light's criteria has not been validated in children. The purpose of this study was to review the use of Light's criteria in hospitalized children with a pleural effusion of unknown etiology. METHODS: Retrospective review was performed on children hospitalized with a pleural effusion requiring chest tube placement or thoracentesis between January 1, 2016 to January 1, 2017 at Children's Hospital Colorado. Charts were reviewed for primary team, use of Light's criteria, pleural effusion diagnosis, and 30-day recurrence of repeat intervention or fluid analysis. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients were hospitalized with a pleural effusion of unknown etiology requiring intervention. Only 16 pleural effusions (24%) were classified using Light's criteria. In those patients for whom Light's criteria was used, a diagnosis or change in management occurred in 10 of 16 patients (63%). Pleural effusions were most common on the cardiology service (26/68). Use of Light's criteria was most frequent on the oncology service (7/8). Thirty-day need for repeat intervention was lower in those with Light's criteria (13%) compared to those without (27%). CONCLUSIONS: Light's criteria were utilized infrequently in hospitalized children with a pleural effusion of unknown etiology at a single institution. There was considerable practice variation among provider teams. When utilized, Light's criteria assisted in making a diagnosis or changing management in many patients, and may lead to a reduction in 30-day recurrence requiring repeat intervention.

Diagnostic approach to pleural diseases: new tricks for an old trade.

The burden of pleural diseases has substantially increased in the past decade because of a rise in the incidence of pleural space infections and pleural malignancies in a patient population that is older and more immunocompromised and has more comorbidities. This complexity increasingly requires minimally invasive diagnostic options and tailored management. Implications for patients are such that the limitations of current diagnostic methods need to be addressed by multidisciplinary teams of investigators from the fields of imaging, biology, and engineering. Ignored for a long time as an epiphenomenon at the crossroad of many unrelated medical problems, pleural diseases are finally getting the attention they deserve and have spurred a vibrant and exciting field of research.

Bilateral Chylothorax Complicating a Case of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Case Report.

Chylothorax occurs when lymphatic fluid leaks from the thoracic duct and accumulates in the pleural space. Bilateral chylothorax caused by chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has been rarely reported in the literature. Sludging of lymph might be the underlying cause. We present a case of bilateral chylothorax in a patient with CLL.We also briefly discuss etiology, possible pathogenesis in our case along with diagnostic options and treatment modalities.

Pleural Fluid Analysis in Chronic Hemothorax: A Mimicker of Infection.

OBJECTIVES: Timing to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in hemothorax is based on preventing acute and long-term complications of retained blood products in the pleural space, including pleural space infection. We propose that the persistence of blood in the pleural space induces a proinflammatory state, independent of active infection. METHODS: We identified six patients with a hemothorax by clinical history, radiographic imaging, and pleural fluid analysis from a database of 1133 patients undergoing thoracentesis from 2002 to 2010 at the Medical University of South Carolina. RESULTS: In four of the six patients identified, the time from injury to thoracentesis was one, four, four, and five days, respectively. The fluid pH range was 7.32-7.41. The lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) range was 210-884 IU/L (mean 547 IU/L), and the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) range was 1196-3631 cells/µL. In two patients, the time from injury to thoracentesis was 7 and 60 days. In these two patients, the pH was 7.18 and 6.91, LDH was 1679 and 961 IU/L, and the ANC was 8134 and 5943 cells/µL. Microbiology and pathology were negative in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: The persistence of blood outside the vascular compartment, and within the pleural space, biochemically mirrors infection. We will explore the multiple mechanisms that account for development of pleural fluid acidosis, inflammation, and neutrophil recruitment.

Management of Parapneumonic Pleural Effusion in Adults.

Pleural infections have high morbidity and mortality, and their incidence in all age groups is growing worldwide. Not all infectious effusions are parapneumonic and, in such cases, the organisms found in the pleural space are not the same as those observed in lung parenchyma infections. The diagnostic difficulty lies in knowing whether an infectious effusion will evolve into a complicated effusion/empyema, as the diagnostic methods used for this purpose provide poor results. The mainstays of treatment are to establish an early diagnosis and to commence an antibiotic regimen and chest drain as soon as possible. This should preferably be carried out with fine tubes, due to certain morphological, bacteriological and biochemical characteristics of the pleural fluid. Fluid analysis, particularly pH, is the most reliable method for assessing evolution. In a subgroup of patients, fibrinolytics may help to improve recovery, and their combination with DNase has been found to obtain better results. If medical treatment fails and surgery is required, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is, at least, comparable to decortication by thoracotomy, so should only undertaken if previous techniques have failed. Further clinical trials are needed to analyze factors that could affect the results obtained, in order to define new evidence-based diagnostic and therapeutic strategies that provide more effective, standardized management of this disease.