Pneumatic dilation for achalasia in the "POEM era": Still a valuable ally.

Endoscopic treatments such as peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) and pneumatic dilation (PD) are commonly used to treat achalasia. Although POEM has gained popularity due to its high efficacy, the technique is more complex and may be associated with a higher risk of long-term complications compared to PD. This narrative review will focus on efficacy and safety of PD and POEM, and their suitability for different patient populations. While evidence suggests that POEM may be preferred for type III achalasia, PD remains a valuable alternative for patients with a straight, non-dilated esophagus, who prioritize the preservation of anatomical integrity and a lower risk of post-procedural gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). While PD carries a non negligibile risk of perforation, it has an excellent safety profile in terms of GERD and is minimally likely to cause permanent esophageal deformation. PD can be repeated with minimal risks to maintain symptom relief, whereas reversing permanent anatomical modifications related to POEM is difficult. The choice of treatment for achalasia should be patient-tailored, considering benefits and drawbacks of each intervention. The importance of personalized approach in the "POEM era" is highlighted, emphasizing the reasons why PD should still be considered a valuable option in the therapeutic armamentarium for achalasia. Areas requiring further research will be also outlined.

An overview of the efficacy, safety, and predictors of achalasia treatments.

INTRODUCTION: Achalasia is a rare esophageal motility disorder characterized by abnormal esophageal peristalsis and the inability of the lower esophageal sphincter to relax, resulting in poor esophageal emptying. This can be relieved by endoscopic and surgical treatments; each comes with certain advantages and disadvantages. AREAS COVERED: This review aims to guide the clinician in clinical decision making on the different treatment options for achalasia regarding the efficacy, safety, and important predictors. EXPERT OPINION: Botulinum toxin injection is only recommended for a selective group of achalasia patients because of the short term effect. Pneumatic dilation improves achalasia symptoms, but this effect diminishes over time and requiring repeated dilations to maintain clinical effect. Heller myotomy combined with fundoplication and peroral endoscopic myotomy are highly effective on the long term but are more invasive than dilations. Gastro-esophageal reflux complaints are more often encountered after peroral endoscopic myotomy. Patient factors such as age, comorbidities, and type of achalasia must be taken into account when choosing a treatment. The preference of the patient is also of great importance and therefore shared decision making has to play a fundamental role in deciding about treatment.

Safety of Pneumatic Dilation in Older Adults with Achalasia: An International Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: Pneumatic dilation (PD) is an effective first line treatment option for many patients with achalasia. PD use may be limited in adults with achalasia who are older than 65 because of concern for adverse events (AE), and less efficacious therapies are often utilized. We explored the periprocedural safety profile of PD in older adults. METHODS: An international real world cross-sectional study of patients undergoing PD between 2006-2020 in two tertiary centers. Thirty-day AEs were compared between older adults (65 and older) with achalasia and younger patients. RESULTS: A total of 252 patients underwent 319 PDs. In 319 PDs, 18 (5.7%) complications occurred: 6 (1.9%) perforations and 12 (3.8%) emergency department referrals with benign (non-perforation) chest pain, of which 9 (2.8%) were hospitalized. No bleeding or death occurred within 30 days. Perforation rates were similar in both age groups and across achalasia subtypes. Advanced age was protective of benign chest pain complications in univariate analysis, and the limited number of AEs precluded multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The safety of PD in older adults is at least comparable to that of younger patients and should be offered as an option for definitive therapy for older patients with achalasia. Our results may affect informed consent discussions.

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) in the treatment of severe postfundoplication dysphagia.

Although uncommon, chronic postfundoplication dysphagia (PFD) is a serious complication of antireflux surgery. Currently, reoperation is the only possible solution as endoscopic pneumatic or hydraulic dilation are not effective. At present, POEM represents a standard method for the treatment of esophageal achalasia; however, in patients with PFD it is an experimental approach whose clinical effectiveness is unknown. Our case report describes a female patient who suffered from severe PFD after two surgeries (fundoplication and subsequent reoperation). Dysphagia and progressive weight loss had developed over the years and all treatment attempts (several sessions of dilation) were unsuccessful. Subsequently, esophageal resection was considered as the last resort. After a discussion in a multidisciplinary team and additional examinations (EndoFLIP), POEM was performed without any complications, and the procedure had an excellent effect without any adverse events.

Esophagogastric Junction Outflow Obstruction Is Likely to Be a Local Manifestation of Other Primary Diseases: Analysis of Single-Center 4-Year Follow-Up Data.

BACKGROUND: Whether esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO) is a variant of achalasia cardia (AC) or an esophageal motility state of certain organic or systemic diseases remains controversial. We aimed to investigate the differences between EGJOO and AC in clinical characteristics and outcomes through a 4-year follow-up. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with primary EGJOO or AC were included. Based on the presence of concomitant disease, EGJOO patients were divided into a functional and an anatomical EGJOO group; similarly, patients with AC were divided into an AC with organic disease group and a true AC group. Disease characteristics and high-resolution manometry (HRM) parameters were retrospectively compared between the groups, and the development of organic diseases that could affect esophageal motility disorders and responses to treatment were examined during the follow-up. Symptom relief was defined as an Eckardt score of ≤3 after the treatment. RESULTS: The study included 79 AC patients and 70 EGJOO patients. Compared with patients with AC, EGJOO patients were older, had shorter disease duration, a lower Eckardt score, and were more likely to have concurrent adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) and autoimmune disease (p < 0.05 for all). The severity of dysphagia and Eckardt scores were higher in the anatomical EGJOO group than in the functional EGJOO group. Significant differences were seen in HRM parameters (UES residual pressure, LES basal pressure, and LES residual pressure) between AC and EGJOO patients. However, no significant differences in HRM parameters were observed between the functional EGJOO and anatomical EGJOO groups. Sixty-seven (95.71%) patients with EGJOO and sixty-nine (87.34%) patients with AC experienced symptom relief (p = 0.071). Among patients achieving symptom relief, a relatively large proportion of patients with EGJOO had symptom relief after medications (37/67, 55.22%), the resolution of potential reasons (7/67, 10.45%), and spontaneous relief (15/67, 22.39%), while more patients with AC had symptom relief after POEM (66/69, 95.65%). Among EGJOO patients achieving symptom relief, more patients (7/20, 35%) with anatomical EGJOO had symptom relief after the resolution of potential reasons for EGJOO, while more patients (32/47, 68.09%) with functional EGJOO had symptom relief with medications. CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent AEG and autoimmune diseases are more likely in EGJOO than in AC. A considerable part of EGJOO may be the early manifestation of an organic disease. Anatomical EGJOO patients experience symptom improvement with the resolution of primary diseases, while most functional EGJOO patients experience symptom relief with pharmacotherapy alone or even without any treatment.

The Efficacy of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy vs Pneumatic Dilation as Treatment for Patients With Achalasia Suffering From Persistent or Recurrent Symptoms After Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: For patients with achalasia experiencing persistent or recurrent symptoms after laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM), pneumatic dilation (PD) is the most frequently used treatment. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is increasingly being investigated as rescue therapy. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of POEM vs PD for patients with persistent or recurrent symptoms after LHM. METHODS: This randomized multicenter controlled trial included patients after LHM with an Eckardt score >3 and substantial stasis (≥2 cm) on timed barium esophagogram and randomized to POEM or PD. The primary outcome was treatment success, defined as an Eckardt score of ≤3 and without unscheduled re-treatment. Secondary outcomes included the presence of reflux esophagitis, high-resolution manometry, and timed barium esophagogram findings. Follow-up duration was 1 year after initial treatment. RESULTS: Ninety patients were included. POEM had a higher success rate (28 of 45 patients [62.2%]) than PD (12 of 45 patients [26.7%]; absolute difference, 35.6%; 95% CI, 16.4%-54.7%; P = .001; odds ratio, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.09-0.54; relative risk for success, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.37-3.99). Reflux esophagitis was not significantly different between POEM (12 of 35 [34.3%]) and PD (6 of 40 [15%]). Basal lower esophageal sphincter pressure and integrated relaxation pressure (IRP-4) were significantly lower in the POEM group (P = .034; P = .002). Barium column height after 2 and 5 minutes was significantly less in patients treated with POEM (P = .005; P = .015). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with achalasia experiencing persistent or recurrent symptoms after LHM, POEM resulted in a significantly higher success rate than PD, with a numerically higher incidence of grade A-B reflux esophagitis. NETHERLANDS TRIAL REGISTRY: NL4361 (NTR4501), https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID = NTR4501.

Impact of opioids on treatment response among idiopathic esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction patients: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal dysmotility has been attributed to opioid use. The goal was to assess the differences in pre- and post-treatment timed-barium esophagram (TBE) barium heights at 1 and 5 minutes and symptomatic response to treatment in esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO) patients according to opioid use status. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study. Consecutive patients with EGJOO were eligible for inclusion. Data were collected on demographics, pre and post-treatment 1 and 5 minutes TBE barium heights and symptom outcomes. Groups were compared according to opioid use. RESULTS: Thirty-one EGJOO patients met the inclusion criteria. All patients were treated with pneumatic dilation. Of the 31 patients, 11 (35%) had opioid exposure and 20 (65%) did not. The median follow-up post-treatment was two months (range 1-47 months). There was no statistically significant difference in post-treatment outcomes for opioid exposed vs. unexposed groups. The median per cent decrease in the TBE barium height at 1 minute was 100% for the opioid exposed vs. 71% for the unexposed group (p = 0.92). The median per cent decrease in the TBE barium height at 5 minutes was zero % for the opioid exposed and unexposed groups (p = 0.67). The incidence of symptomatic improvement was 82% (9/11) for the opioid exposed group vs 95% (19/20) for the unexposed group (p = 0.28). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with EGJOO seem to respond to treatment similarly regardless of being on opioids.

Update on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Achalasia.

Achalasia is a rare disease of the esophagus with impaired relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter and aperistalsis. The etiology is unknown but speculations include a viral or autoimmune etiology. All specialists dealing with swallowing and esophageal diseases should recognize the classic symptoms of dysphagia for solids/liquids, regurgitation, and choking, especially at night. High-resolution manometry is critical for the diagnosis with endoscopy and barium esophagram having a supportive role. The disease cannot be cured but most can return to near normal swallowing and a regular diet with appropriate therapy. Treatment includes smooth muscle relaxants, botulinum toxin injections to the lower sphincter, pneumatic dilation, Heller myotomy, and peroral endoscopic myotomy. One treatment does not fit all and a tailored approach through a multidiscipline team will give the best long-term outcomes.

Achalasia: Current therapeutic options.

Achalasia is an esophageal motor disorder characterized by impaired relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and absent peristalsis in the smooth muscle esophageal body. As a result, patients typically experience dysphagia, regurgitation, chest pain, and weight loss. Over the past 10-15 years, there has been a resurgence of interest in the evaluation of therapies for achalasia. Unfortunately, little progress in the development of effective pharmacological treatments has been made. Botulinum toxin injection provides some relief of symptoms in many patients but requires periodic reinjection that may provide progressively less benefit over time. There are now three well-established, safe, and effective therapies for the treatment of achalasia: pneumatic dilation (PD), laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM), and peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) which can lead to marked symptom improvement in most patients. Each treatment has a specific constellation of risks, benefits, and recurrence rate. The first-line treatment used will depend on patient preference, achalasia subtype, and local expertise. The recent impressive advances in both the art and science of achalasia therapy are explored with a comprehensive review of the various treatment modalities and comparative controlled clinical trials. In addition, key technical pearls of the procedural treatments are demonstrated.

Recurrent dysphagia after myotomy for achalasia: pneumatic dilation or POEM? : Which modality offers superior outcomes?

INTRODUCTION: Myotomy is the gold standard treatment for achalasia, yet long-term failure rates approach 15%. Treatment options for recurrent dysphagia include pneumatic dilation (PD), laparoscopic redo myotomy, per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM), or esophagectomy. We employ both PD and POEM as first-line treatment for these patients. We evaluated operative success and patient reported outcomes for patients who underwent PD or POEM for recurrent dysphagia after myotomy. METHODS: We identified patients with achalasia who underwent PD or POEM for recurrent dysphagia after previous myotomy within a foregut database at our institution between 2013 and 2021. Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health-Related quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) and Eckardt scores, and overall change in each were compared across PD and POEM groups. Successful treatment of dysphagia was defined by Eckardt scores ≤ 3. RESULTS: 103 patients underwent myotomy for achalasia. Of these, 19 (18%) had either PD or POEM for recurrent dysphagia. Nine were treated with PD and 10 with POEM. The mean change in Eckardt and GERD-HRQL scores did not differ between groups. 50% of the PD group and 67% of the POEM group had resolution of their dysphagia symptoms (p = 0.65). Mean procedure length was greater in the POEM group (267 vs 72 min, p < 0.01) as was mean length of stay (1.56 vs 0.3 days, p < 0.01). There was one adverse event after PD and three adverse events after POEM. After PD, 7 patients (70%) required additional procedures compared to four patients (44%) in the POEM group, consisting mostly of repeat PD. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing PD or POEM for recurrent dysphagia after myotomy have similar rates of dysphagia resolution and reflux symptoms. Patients undergoing PD enjoy a shorter length of stay and shorter procedure time but may require more subsequent procedures.

Pneumatic dilation for the treatment of persistent post-laparoscopic fundoplication dysphagia: long-term efficacy and safety.

BACKGROUND: Post-laparoscopic fundoplication (LF) dysphagia occurs in 5%-17% of patients and optimal management remains a topic of expert discussion. We assessed the efficacy and safety of pneumatic dilation (PD) in patients with persistent post-lLF dysphagia. METHODS: Medical files of patients treated with PD for persistent post-fundoplication-associated dysphagia were reviewed. The primary outcome was long-term clinical success. Secondary endpoints were initial clinical success, dysphagia recurrence rate, and PD-related complication incidence. RESULTS: Overall, 46 patients (74% women, 57.9±11.9 years) underwent 74 PD (mean: 1.6±0.8). A 30 mm, 35 mm, and 40 mm balloon was used in 45.9%, 43.2%, and 10.8%, respectively, of dilations. Among 45 patients with available follow-up, the overall long-term success rate of PD was 31/45 (68.9% [55.4-82.4]). Initial clinical success was 36/45 (80% [68.3-91.7]). Dysphagia recurred in 9 patients (25%; 95%CI 10.9-39.1) and 4 of these were effectively treated with a new dilation. Among 14 non-responders to PD, 11 underwent surgery. Four complications (2 perforations, 1 muscularis dilaceration, and 1 peri-procedural bleeding) occurred in 4 patients (incidence: 5.4% [95%CI; 0.3-10.6]) and were treated with partially covered self-expandable esophageal stents andhemostatic clips. CONCLUSIONS: Pneumatic balloon dilation for post-fundoplication-associated symptoms is associated with a satisfactory long-term success rate and acceptable safety profile.

Pneumatic dilation for esophageal achalasia: patient selection and perspectives.

Achalasia is an esophageal motility disorder characterized by esophageal aperistalsis and impaired relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter. Treatment is palliative, aimed at decreasing the lower esophageal sphincter pressure. Pneumatic dilation (PD) is a safe and effective treatment for achalasia. Several other invasive and minimally invasive treatment modalities, such as Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy (LHM) and Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM), also have a comparable safety and efficacy profile to PD. The current review focuses on the indications, contraindications, techniques, and outcomes of PD in various patient populations and its comparison to LHM and POEM. This review also provides relevant information to help endoscopists identify those patients who will benefit the most from PD.

Graded pneumatic dilation in subtype I and II achalasia: long-term experience in a single center.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of pneumatic dilation (PD) in the management of achalasia has yielded variable results. The availability of high-resolution manometry led to the identification of 3 clinically relevant subtypes of achalasia, revealing the poor efficacy of PD in subtype III. Furthermore, PD showed a lower response rate in patients with subtype III compared to laparoscopic Heller myotomy and peroral endoscopic myotomy. This study aimed to investigate the short- and long-term efficacy, safety profile and side effects of PD with a "graded approach" in subtypes I and II achalasia. METHODS: We enrolled 141 patients (male 67, mean age=66±16.26 years) with achalasia (n=27 subtype I, n=74 subtype II and n=40 subtype III) between January 2010 and July 2020 at St. Orsola University Hospital, Bologna, Italy. We analyzed the data of patients with subtypes I and II, who underwent a graded-protocol PD. Short- and long-term clinical efficacy, complications and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) were recorded. RESULTS: One month after graded protocol PD, 100% subtype I and 96.2% subtype II achalasia patients showed clinical remission. The PD procedure was completed without major complications in all patients. In the long-term follow up (median time: 56 months), 95.5% subtype I and 90% subtype II achalasia patients had an Eckardt score ≤3. GERD occurred in 27.7% of all patients. CONCLUSION: A graded-protocol PD applied in the appropriate achalasia subtypes was shown to be a safe and highly effective approach, in both the short- and long-term.

An 18-Month-Old Child Suffering From Achalasia Cardia Successfully Treated With Pneumatic Dilation.

Achalasia cardia is an idiopathic esophageal motility disorder. It is rare in children and infrequent in below school-going age groups. The "bird's beak" appearance of the lower esophagus on the esophagogram (barium swallow) is a classical radiological finding in the cases of esophageal Achalasia. The goals of achalasia therapy are symptom relief and improvement of esophageal emptying to prevent megaesophagus. The most effective treatment options are pneumatic dilation and surgical myotomy (Heller's myotomy). Pneumatic dilation is the initial treatment of choice and does not preclude myotomy. Here, we present our experience with a young child with achalasia cardia that was successfully treated with pneumatic dilation.

Revisional Therapy for Recurrent Symptoms After Heller Myotomy for Achalasia.

PURPOSE: Symptom recurrence after initial surgical management of esophageal achalasia occurs in 10-25% of patients. The aim of this study was to analyze safety and efficacy of revisional therapy after failed Heller myotomy (HM). METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospective database was performed searching for patients with recurrent symptoms after primary surgical therapy for achalasia. Patients with previously failed HM were considered for the final analysis. The Foregut questionnaire, and the Atkinson and Eckardt scales were used to assess severity of symptoms. Objective investigations routinely included upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and barium swallow study. Redo treatments consisted of endoscopic pneumatic dilation (PD), laparoscopic HM, hybrid Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, or stapled cardioplasty. A yearly clinical and endoscopic follow-up was scheduled in all patients. RESULTS: Over a 20-year period, 26 patients with a median age of 66 years (IQR 19.5) underwent revisional therapy after failed HM for achalasia at a tertiary-care university hospital. The median time after index procedure was 10 years (IQR 21). Revisional therapy consisted of endoscopic pneumatic dilation (n=13), laparoscopic HM and fundoplication (n=10), esophagectomy (n=2), and stapled cardioplasty and fundoplication (n=1). Nine (34.6%) of these patients required further endoscopic or surgical treatments. There was no mortality, and the overall complication rate was 7.7%. At a median follow-up of 42 months (range 10-149), a significant decrease of dysphagia, regurgitation, chest pain, respiratory symptoms, and median Eckardt score (p<0.05) was noted. CONCLUSION: In specialized and multidisciplinary centers, revisional therapy for achalasia is feasible, safe, and effective.

Achalasia: Diagnosis, Management and Surveillance.

Achalasia is a rare chronic esophageal motility disorder characterized by incomplete relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter and abnormal peristalsis. This abnormal motor function leads to impaired bolus emptying and symptoms of dysphagia, regurgitation, chest pain, or heartburn. After an upper endoscopy to exclude structural causes of symptoms, the gold standard for diagnosis is high-resolution esophageal manometry. However, complementary diagnostic tools include barium esophagram and functional luminal impedance planimetry. Definitive treatments include pneumatic dilation, Heller myotomy with fundoplication, and peroral endoscopic myotomy.

Endoscopic Management of Sleeve Stenosis.

PURPOSE: Sleeve gastrectomy is one of the most popular bariatric procedures performed. A complication of this surgery is sleeve stenosis, causing significant morbidity and the need for corrective intervention. Endoscopic treatment using pneumatic dilation has evolved as an effective, and minimally invasive, technique to successfully treat this complication. Here we report our experience with endoscopic management of sleeve stenosis at a tertiary bariatric center. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We identified all patients that underwent endoscopic management of sleeve stenosis at a tertiary bariatric center from 2010. We reviewed patient demographics, operative data, interval to endoscopic treatment, and outcomes of pneumatic dilations. RESULTS: Sixty seven patients underwent 130 endoscopic dilations. The majority of these patients were female (71%), and at the time of sleeve gastrectomy average age was 43.3 years (range 18-68 years) and average BMI was 41.5 kg/m2 (range 31-63 kg/m2). The time interval to first endoscopic procedure was 7.2 months (range 0.75-53 months), with an average of 2 procedures per patient. During the follow-up period, the success rate of endoscopic dilatation was 76.1%, while the remaining 16 patients underwent conversion to gastric bypass. Two patients underwent emergency conversion to gastric bypass for sleeve perforation during the procedure (1.5%). There was a modest weight gain of 3 kg (4.2% total body weight) after sleeve dilatation. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic management of sleeve stenosis is safe and effective, with a success rate of over 75%. During endoscopic management, there was a 1.5% risk of sleeve perforation requiring emergency surgery. Mild weight regain occurred following endoscopic sleeve dilation.

Is peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) more effective than pneumatic dilation and Heller myotomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Achalasia is a rare, chronic, and morbid condition with evolving treatment. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has gained considerable popularity, but its comparative effectiveness is uncertain. We aim to evaluate the literature comparing POEM to Heller myotomy (HM) and pneumatic dilation (PD) for the treatment of achalasia. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of comparative studies between POEM and HM or PD. A priori outcomes pertained to efficacy, perioperative metrics, and safety. Internal validity of observational studies and randomized trials (RCTs) was judged using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale and the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool, respectively. RESULTS: From 1379 unique literature citations, we included 28 studies comparing POEM and HM (n = 21) or PD (n = 8), with only 1 RCT addressing each. Aside from two 4-year observational studies, POEM follow-up averaged ≤ 2 years. While POEM had similar efficacy to HM, POEM treated dysphagia better than PD both in an RCT (treatment "success" RR 1.71, 95% CI 1.34-2.17; 126 patients) and in observational studies (Eckardt score MD - 0.43, 95% CI - 0.71 to - 0.16; 5 studies; I2 21%; 405 patients). POEM needed reintervention less than PD in an RCT (RR 0.19, 95% CI 0.08-0.47; 126 patients) and HM in an observational study (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.16, 0.68; 98 patients). Though 6-12 months patient-reported reflux was worse than PD in 3 observational studies (RR 2.67, 95% CI 1.02-7.00; I2 0%; 164 patients), post-intervention reflux was inconsistently measured and not statistically different in measures ≥ 1 year. POEM had similar safety outcomes to both HM and PD, including treatment-related serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: POEM has similar outcomes to HM and greater efficacy than PD. Reflux remains a critical outcome with unknown long-term clinical significance due to insufficient data and inconsistent reporting.