Comparison of complication rates between anterior versus posterior approaches for treating unstable Hangman's fracture. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Study design: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Objective: To compare the complication rates associated with anterior and posterior approaches for the surgical treatment of unstable hangman's fractures. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases to identify comparative studies reporting complications of anterior versus posterior approaches for the treatment of unstable hangman's fractures. Results: The search yielded 1163 papers from which 5 studies were fully included. One hundred fifteen (115) patients were operated on using an anterior approach versus 65 through a posterior approach. The average complication rates for the anterior and posterior approaches were 26.1 % and 13.8 %, respectively. No complications following the anterior approach required pharmacological or surgical intervention (Clavien-Dindo, Grade 1), while 88.9 % of complications following the posterior approach did (Clavien-Dindo, Grade 2). Conclusion: No significant differences in the complication rates were found when comparing anterior versus posterior surgery for treating a C2 traumatic spondylolisthesis. However, most of the complications presented in the posterior surgery group were more severe.

Estudio comparativo entre la fusión lumbar intersomática por vía oblicua y la fusión lumbar intersomática por vía posterior. Resultados radiográficos y clínicos a corto plazo / Comparison between oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). Short-term radiographic and clinical results

Introducción. La fusión lumbar intersomática posterior (PLIF, "posterior lumbar interbody fusion") es un procedimiento ampliamente utilizado. En los últimos años, la fusión lumbar intersomática por vía oblicua (OLIF, "oblique lumbar interbody fusión") ha ganado cierta popularidad dado su abordaje mini-invasivo y su capacidad de descompresión indirecta. Objetivo. Comparar retrospectivamente los resultados clínicos y radiológicos de pacientes operados por vía oblicua y por vía posterior a corto plazo.Materiales y métodos. Se reunieron los pacientes intervenidos quirúrgicamente por vía OLIF y PLIF entre 2020 y 2021. Se dividieron en dos grupos según la vía utilizada y se compararon los datos demográficos y resultados radiográficos entre el preoperatorio y postoperatorio. Se utilizó el cuestionario de Oswestry (ODI) para evaluar la escala de discapacidad por dolor lumbar y se registraron las complicaciones de ambos grupos. Resultados. Sobre 118 pacientes, 56 corresponden a la vía OLIF y 62 al PLIF. Con respecto al ODI, no se registraron diferencias significativas entre ambos grupos previamente ni posterior a la cirugía. El grupo OLIF mostró mejores resultados radiográficos que el grupo PLIF en el posoperatorio, con una diferencia significativa en la lordosis lumbar total (p 0,017). El grupo PLIF mostró un mayor número de complicaciones posoperatorias. Conclusión. La vía OLIF puede ser un método quirúrgico alternativo a la vía posterior tradicional en pacientes con patología degenerativa lumbar. Esta vía permitiría obtener mejores resultados radiográficos con menos complicaciones comparado con la vía tradiciona

Background. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) is a widely used method. In recent years, oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) has gained some popularity due to its minimally invasive approach and ability of indirect decompression. Objective. Our objective is to compare retrospectively clinical and radiological results of patients operated by boths techniques in the short term.Materials and methods. Patients who underwent surgery by the OLIF and PLIF between 2020 and 2021 were gathered. They were divided into two groups according to the technique used; and demographic data and radiographic results were compared between the preoperative and postoperative periods. The Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODI) was used to assess the low back pain disability; and complications were recorded for both groups. Results. Out of 118 patients, 56 correspond to the OLIF group and 62 to the PLIF group. Regarding the ODI, no significant differences were recorded between the two groups before and after surgery. The OLIF group showed better radiographic results than the PLIF group in the postoperative period, with a significant difference in total lumbar lordosis (p 0.017). The PLIF group showed a higher number of postoperative complications. Conclusion: The OLIF approach can be an alternative surgical method to the traditional posterior approach in patients with lumbar degenerative pathology. This technique would allow obtaining better radiographic results with fewer complications compared to the traditional technique

A Prospective Observational Study on Outcomes of Single Stage Posterior Decompression and Fixation for Dorsolumbar Spine Tuberculosis / Estudo observacional prospectivo sobre os desfechos da descompressão posterior e fixação em estágio único na tuberculose da coluna dorsolombar

Abstract Objective To study the results of only posterior decompression and instrumentation in dorsal and dorsolumbar spine tuberculosis. Methods The patients (n = 30) who were included in this study had dorsal or dorsolumbar spine tuberculosis, with or without neurological deficit, and with or without deformity. All 30 patients were managed by only posterior approach decompression and instrumentation. We studied cases for correction and maintenance of deformity at dorsal and dorsolumbar spine, functional outcome by the Oswestry disability index (ODI) and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, as well as neurological outcome by the Frankel grade. Results In the current series, 30 patients were operated with single stage posterior decompression and instrumentation, and showed significant improvement in neurological status and functional outcomes, which were accessed by the ODI score, VAS score, and Frankel grade. Conclusion The posterior (extracavitary) approach provides optimum access to the lateral and anterior aspects of the spinal cord for good decompression. It facilitates early mobilization and avoids problems of prolonged recumbency, provides better functional outcome, and significantly better sagittal plane kyphosis correction.

Resumo Objetivo Estudar os desfechos da descompressão posterior isolada e instrumentação na tuberculose da coluna dorsal e dorsolombar. Métodos Os pacientes (n = 30) incluídos neste estudo apresentavam tuberculose na coluna dorsal ou dorsolombar, acompanhada ou não por déficit neurológico e/ou deformidade. Todos os 30 pacientes foram tratados apenas por descompressão posterior e instrumentação. Estudamos a correção e manutenção da deformidade na coluna dorsal e dorsolombar, o desfecho funcional segundo o índice de deficiência de Oswestry (ODI) e a escala visual analógica (EVA); o desfecho neurológico foi estudado de acordo com a classificação de Frankel. Resultados Na atual série, 30 pacientes foram submetidos à descompressão posterior e instrumentação em estágio único e apresentaram melhora significativa no estado neurológico e desfecho funcional segundo os scores de ODI, EVA e classificação de Frankel. Conclusão A abordagem posterior (extracavitária) permite o acesso ideal aos aspectos laterais e anteriores da medula espinhal para uma boa descompressão. Facilita a mobilização precoce, evita problemas associados ao decúbito prolongado, proporciona melhor desfecho funcional e corrige a cifose no plano sagital de maneira significativamente melhor.

Patients Achieving 90°/45°/0° Intraoperative Stability Do Not Require Hip Precautions Following Posterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Study.

BACKGROUND: Hip precautions are traditionally employed after posterior total hip arthroplasty (THA). The primary purpose was to investigate the necessity of hip precautions after posterior approach THA. We hypothesized that eliminating precautions in patients that achieved appropriate intraoperative stability would not increase the dislocation rate. METHODS: Randomized controlled trial of 346 consecutive eligible patients undergoing primary THA with a mean follow-up of 2.3 years (range 11 months to 3.7 years). EXCLUSION CRITERIA: lumbar fusion, scoliosis, abductor insufficiency, inability to achieve intraoperative stability with combined 90° flexion and 45° internal rotation in 0° adduction. Fisher's exact test was used to compare dislocation rates between the hip precaution (HP) control group and no hip precaution (NP) study group. In addition, Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare differences in HOOS JR scores at 2, 6, 12 weeks between groups. RESULTS: The dislocation rate was not increased in the NP (0/172: 0%) group compared to the HP group 4/174 (2.29%) (P = .418). All dislocations occurred in the precautions group, two of which required revision. There were no differences in mean HOOS Jr. scores at any 2, 6, or 12 weeks (P > .05 at all timepoints) (secondary outcome). CONCLUSION: Eliminating hip precautions in patients undergoing posterior approach THA that achieve 90°/45°/0° intraoperative stability does not increase the rate of dislocation. In fact, every dislocation occurred in patients receiving hip precautions. Short-term patient-reported outcome measures were not affected by hip precautions. Surgeons may discontinue the use of hip precautions as the standard of care in patients achieving 90°/45°/0° stability.

Comparación de resultados entre el abordaje anterior y posterior en la artroplastia total de cadera / Comparing Results between the Anterior and Posterior Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Introducción: Existe una gran controversia con respecto a la existencia de un abordaje quirúrgico óptimo para artroplastia de cadera. El énfasis actual en la investigación ha sido examinar las posibles diferencias en los resultados funcionales entre el abordaje anterior y el abordaje posterior. Objetivo: Comparar las medidas de resultado informadas por los pacientes sometidos a artroplastia total de cadera, mediante abordajes anterior y posterior. Métodos: Se realiza una búsqueda sobre el tema en la base de datos PubMed entre los años 2010-2020 en inglés con los términos: comparación entre abordaje anterior y abordaje posterior de la cadera, abordaje anterior directo de la cadera, abordaje posterior de la cadera, y resultados de artroplastia de la cadera mediante abordajes anterior y posterior. Análisis y síntesis de la información: El abordaje anterior muestra una mayor mejora en la velocidad de la marcha, la longitud del paso y la simetría de la marcha, en comparación con el abordaje posterior para artroplastia de cadera al mes después de la operación. A los cuatro meses estas características de la marcha no fueron diferentes, pero los resultados de algunas pruebas funcionales fueron superiores en los pacientes intervenidos por abordaje anterior. Conclusiones: La elección del abordaje quirúrgico para artroplastia de cadera debe basarse en los factores del paciente, la preferencia del cirujano y su experiencia(AU)

Introduction: There is great controversy regarding the existence of an optimal surgical approach for hip arthroplasty. The current research emphasis has been to examine the possible differences in functional outcomes between anterior and posterior approaches. Objective: To compare the outcome measures reported by patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty, using anterior and posterior approaches. Methods: A search is carried out on the subject in the PubMed database during the years 2010-2020, in English, with the terms comparison between anterior approach and posterior approach to the hip, direct anterior approach to the hip, posterior approach to the hip, and results of hip arthroplasty using anterior and posterior approaches. Analysis and synthesis of the information: The anterior approach showed greater improvement in gait speed, stride length and gait symmetry, compared to the posterior approach for hip arthroplasty one month after the operation. At four months, these gait characteristics were not different, but the results of some functional tests were superior in patients operated on by anterior approach. Conclusions: The choice of the surgical approach for hip arthroplasty should be based on the patient´s factors, preference of the surgeons and their experience(AU)

Minimally Invasive Posterior Tubular Microsurgical Approach for the Management of Symptomatic Synovial Cysts of the Lumbar and Cervical Spine.

BACKGROUND: Synovial cysts are commonly associated with instability. Whether to fuse patients is a matter of controversy. Simple resection may offer favorable clinical outcomes but may come at the expense of recurrence rate. We describe our experience with the minimally invasive management of these lesions using microsurgical dissection through a tubular retractor system. MATERIALS: A retrospective cohort study of symptomatic patients with synovial cysts treated by a minimally invasive tubular approach from 2001 to 2018 was performed. We evaluated variables such as preexisting spinal pathology, previous surgery, radiological findings, comorbidities, and secondary surgery requiring fusion. We used the visual analog scale (VAS), the Oswestry disability index (ODI), and the Macnab scale for clinical evaluation. RESULTS: There were 35 patients with a mean age of 63 years. The mean duration of symptoms before surgery was 195 weeks. Axial pain was present in 77.1% of cases; radiculopathy was the main symptom in 94.3% of cases. The most frequent site was L4-L5 (62.8%). Presenting comorbidities were lumbar stenosis (28.6% of patients), spondylolisthesis (8.6%), and facet hypertrophy (31.4%). Mean surgical time was 143 minutes (range, 55-360 minutes). The mean hospital stay was 2 days, ranging from 1 to 5 days. No complications were encountered as a consequence of the surgical procedure. All patients showed neurophysiological improvement after surgical intervention. A total of 34 patients (97.14%) showed clinical improvement at the end of follow-up, averaging 17 months and ranging from 1 to 60 months, 28 patients (80%) had good to excellent Macnab outcomes, 6 patients (17.14%) were rated as fair, and 1 (2.86%) patient had a poor Macnab outcome. Radicular VAS significantly changed (P < .05) from a preoperative mean of 8.23 ± 1.24 to a postoperative mean of 2.23 ± 1.94. ODI significantly decreased (P < .05) from a preoperative of mean of 41.02 ± 12.56 to a postoperative of mean of 11.82 ± 10.56. We performed fusion at initial surgery in 37.1% of cases; however, 3 more patients required secondary fusion at follow-up. CONCLUSION: Our series corroborates the prior literature with a low incidence of synovial cysts in the cervical spine and none in the thoracic spine. The present work shows the efficacy of minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of these lesions. Synovial cysts were associated with instability, ultimately requiring fusion in the majority of patients. The authors' study includes a large patient series with minimally invasive microsurgical decompression performed through a tubular retractor to date. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Comparación de cuatro técnicas quirúrgicas para el manejo de la espondilitis tuberculosa de la columna torácica en adultos.

OBJETIVO: Comparar la eficiencia de las cuatro técnicas quirúrgicas más utilizadas para el manejo de la espondilitis tuberculosa. MÉTODO: Estudio retrospectivo en el que se incluyeron pacientes adultos con diagnóstico confirmado de espondilitis tuberculosa, afectación de dos niveles vertebrales o menos y sin deformidad vertebral grave. Se recopilaron y revisaron los expedientes médicos, los estudios de imagen y los datos demográficos de los pacientes intervenidos para analizar retrospectivamente los resultados clínicos y funcionales de cada grupo. Las variables primarias fueron la erradicación de la infección, la fusión vertebral y las complicaciones. Entre las variables secundarias se estudiaron el sangrado intraoperatorio, la estancia hospitalaria y el tiempo quirúrgico. RESULTADOS: Entre los grupos analizados no hubo diferencias significativas (p ≥ 0.05) en la mayoría de las variables analizadas, pero sí (p ≤ 0.001) respecto al sangrado, el tiempo quirúrgico, la estancia intrahospitalaria y las complicaciones, a favor del abordaje posterior único. CONCLUSIONES: El abordaje posterior único logró una eficacia clínica similar a la del resto de los abordajes en términos de erradicación de la infección y fusión vertebral; sin embargo, se asoció a menores tiempo quirúrgico, sangrado, estancia hospitalaria y complicaciones. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficiency of the 4 most used surgical techniques for the management of tuberculous spondylitis. METHOD: Retrospective study in which adult patients with a confirmed diagnosis of tuberculous spondylitis, involvement of two vertebral levels or less, and without severe vertebral deformity were included. The medical records, imaging studies, and demographic data of the operated patients were collected and reviewed to retrospectively analyze the clinical results of each group. The primary variables were cure of infection, spinal fusion, and complications. The secondary variables included intraoperative bleeding, hospital stay, and surgical time. RESULTS: There were no significant differences (p ≥ 0.05) in most of the variables analyzed, however, there were (p ≤ 0.001) regarding bleeding, surgical time, hospital stay and complications between the groups analyzed, with a lower result in all cases for the single posterior approach. CONCLUSIONS: The single posterior approach obtained a clinical efficacy similar to the rest of the approaches in terms of eradication of the infection and vertebral fusion, however, it was associated with less surgical invasion (surgical time and bleeding), a shorter hospital stay and complications.

Principios quirúrgicos en fracturas de platillos tibiales con compromiso de columna posterior / Surgical principles in posterior column tibial plateau fractures

Las fracturas de platillos tibiales son lesiones complejas que incluyen una variedad de patrones morfológicos cada vez mejor caracterizados en la literatura. Históricamente, los esquemas de clasificación se han basado en evaluar los rasgos de fractura en el plano frontal y las técnicas quirúrgicas en lograr la fijación de esos fragmentos, sin tomar en consideración el compromiso óseo que ocurre en la región posterior de los platillos tibiales. Con el advenimiento de la clasificación columnar basada en tomografía computada, se han logrado desarrollar estrategias de fijación optimizada, dando cada vez más relevancia a la columna posterior. Este artículo realiza una revisión extensa de la literatura, otorgando los fundamentos quirúrgicos que explican la importancia del tratamiento específico de la columna posterolateral y posteromedial, con el fin de restablecer la biomecánica normal de la rodilla y el razonamiento quirúrgico de las diversas vías de abordaje específicas para una reducción y osteosíntesis satisfactoria de esos fragmentos.

Tibial plateau fractures are complex injuries which include a variety of morphological patterns that have been increasingly better characterized in the literature. Historically, classifications have focused on description of fracture patterns in the frontal plane, while surgical techniques have focused on reduction of these fragments not considering the osseous defects that occur on the posterior region of the tibial plateau. With new CT scan column based classifications, strategies to optimize fixation have been developed, giving relevance to the posterior column. This article is an exhaustive review of the literature, providing the surgical foundations that explain the importance of specific treatment of the posterolateral and posteromedial column, aiming to restore normal knee biomechanics. Furthermore, this article provides the diverse specific surgical approaches rationale for a satisfactory open reduction and internal fixation of these fragments.

Early Failure of Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: Is Surgical Approach a Risk Factor?

BACKGROUND: In an era of innovation in surgical approaches for total hip arthroplasty (THA), there is concern for increasing trends of early failure. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the incidence of early failure of primary THA stratified by surgical approach. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on consecutive primary THAs completed from 2007 to 2014 at a high-volume center. THAs were stratified by surgical approach. Only the direct anterior (DAA) and posterior approaches (PA) were included. The primary outcome measure was early revision (<5 years). Descriptive statistics were performed using SAS software. RESULTS: In total, 6894 primary THAs performed between 2007 and 2014 were included. Across 2431 DAA THAs and 4463 PA THAs, there were 103 revisions overall. There was no difference in the overall revision rate for DAA THAs (1.69%) compared to PA THAs (1.39%) (P = .33). The DAA had a higher rate of early revisions for femoral component loosening compared to the PA (P = .0003). About 35.7% of DAA THAs were revised for femoral loosening compared to 8% for the PA (P = .0003). Early failure by femoral loosening occurred more often via the DAA in Dorr A bone (P = .03). The PA had a higher incidence of revision for instability (P = .04). There was no difference in modes of failure with regards to time to failure, acetabular loosening, early periprosthetic fracture, or infection. CONCLUSION: The DAA had a higher incidence of femoral loosening while PA had a higher mode of failure due to instability. Overall revision rates were not statistically different between approaches.

Role of Extra-articular Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis and Posterior Approach in Highly Complex Cases.

BACKGROUND: Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis is a procedure commonly used as salvage surgery for various pathologic processes that compromise the ankle and subtalar joints. It is a reasonably standardized procedure when performed as a primary surgery in advanced stages of TTC arthritis. For such cases, there are several alternative approaches, fixation materials, and bone substitutes that can be used. Most represent valid options with similar results in the literature. However, in highly complex cases requiring TTC arthrodesis, the options for the approach and fixation material can be limited. Understanding the alternative approaches and techniques is of great help to the surgeon when faced with highly complex cases, such as patients with multiple previous operations, lack of bone stock, severe deformities, or compromise of associated soft tissues. In this article, we describe the role of the posterior approach with some technical variation that allows extra-articular arthrodesis in highly complex cases, and we present a series of patients with tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis who were operated on using this technique. METHODS: Retrospective review of all patients who underwent tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis via posterior approach between 2008 and 2016. The surgeries were performed by 2 different surgeons with the same technique (posterior approach with sliding graft) but 2 different fixation methods. Radiographs and computed tomographic (CT) studies were reviewed and patient satisfaction was rated using the Coughlin scale. Mean follow-up was 38 months. We identified 20 patients. The mean age was 51.2 years; 11 patients had post-traumatic arthritis whereas the others had other causes of arthritis (inflammatory disease, neurologic deformity, etc). RESULTS: The arthrodesis was performed using a tibiotalocalcaneal plate in 9 patients and retrograde intramedullary nail in 11 patients. Radiographic fusion was observed at an average of 3.1 months. Four patients had complications and 15 reported good or excellent results after surgery. CONCLUSION: Our study found a fusion rate comparable to other studies in highly complex cases. There were no operative wound complications. We observed that the posterior approach, with an extra-articular fusion procedure, was a valid option for salvage surgery in highly complex cases that require tibiotalocalcaneal fusion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective case series.

Relación anatómica del abordaje posterior de húmero mínimamente invasivo con el nervio radial. Un estudio descriptivo en cadáveres / Anatomical relationship of the posterior minimally invasive surgical approach of the humerus with the radial nerve. A cadaveric model study

Introducción Para las fracturas de húmero diafisario de manejo quirúrgico, los abordajes por mínima invasión mejoran desenlaces. Se han descrito varios. Sin embargo, para el abordaje posterior no existe claridad entre la relación anatómica del nervio radial y las incisiones o la posición de la placa. El objetivo de este estudio es describir la relación anatómica del nervio radial tanto con las incisiones del abordaje posterior por mínima invasión como con la punta distal de la placa. Materiales y métodos se realizó un estudio descriptivo en cadáveres sin traumatismo de miembros superiores, en prono con 45° de abducción de hombro y 90° de flexión de codo, tras deslizar una placa de 2,7 mm. Se consignaron en milímetros las distancias del nervio radial respecto a los puntos de referencia del abordaje y la punta distal de la placa. Resultados Por término medio, la longitud humeral fue 286,6 mm; la distancia del epicóndilo lateral al nervio radial, 155,1 mm; la aponeurosis tricipital al nervio radial, 138,9 mm, y la punta distal de la placa al nervio radial, 155,6 mm. Discusión La fijación con placa por mínima invasión por abordaje posterior puede ser segura para las fracturas de húmero diafisario respecto a la lesión del nervio radial, al ubicar los tornillos de la placa por fuera de 128,5-169,5 mm medidos desde la punta de la placa aunque se requieren estudios clínicos para demostrar la seguridad de este abordaje. Nivel de evidencia clínica Nivel IV.

Background It is well known that the various minimally invasive approaches described improve outcomes for the surgical fixation of diaphyseal humerus fractures. However, there is a lack of information between the anatomical relationship of the radial nerve for the required incisions or for the position of the plate when a posterior approach is used. The objective of the study is to describe the anatomical relationship of the radial nerve with both incisions of the posterior minimally invasive approach, and with the distal tip of the osteosynthesis plate. Materials and methods A descriptive study was performed on cadavers without trauma of upper limbs, in prone with 45° of abduction of shoulder and 90° of elbow flexion. After sliding a plate of 2.7 mm, the distances of the radial nerve with respect to the reference points of the approach and distal tip of the plate were recorded in millimetres. Results A mean humeral length of 286.6 mm was found. The mean distance from the lateral epicondyle to the radial nerve was 155.1 mm. The mean distance from the tricipital aponeurosis to the radial nerve was 138.9 mm, and from the distal tip of the plate to the radial nerve was 155.6 mm. Discussion Plate fixation using minimal invasive technique using a posterior surgical approach may be safe for diaphyseal fractures of the humerus with respect to radial nerve injuries, as long as the plate screws are located outside the range of 128.5 mm to 169.5 mm measured from the tip of the plate. Clinical studies are required to demonstrate the safety of this approach. Evidence level IV.

Tratamiento de las fracturas de húmero diafisarias distales con abordaje posterior mínimamente invasivo y placa extraarticular anatómica / Treatment of distal diaphyseal humeral fractures with minimally invasive posterior approach and anatomical extraarticular plate

Introducción Las fracturas de húmero diafisarias corresponden al 3-5% de las fracturas en general. La distribución de las fracturas que comprometen el tercio distal de la diáfisis es variable con incidencias estimadas entre el 10 y el 48%. El objetivo del estudio es evaluar los resultados funcionales y la tasa de consolidación de un grupo de pacientes con fractura diafisaria de húmero del tercio distal con técnica mínimamente invasiva por vía posterior. Materiales y métodos Entre 2013 y 2016 se intervino a 23 pacientes, con una media de edad de 36 años. La valoración funcional se realizó por medio de la Escala de Discapacidades del Hombro, el Codo y la Mano (DASH) abreviada y la medición de los arcos de movilidad de hombro y codo con goniometría; el dolor fue evaluado de acuerdo con la Escala Visual Análoga del Dolor (EVA). Resultados Todas las fracturas consolidaron de forma exitosa, excepto dos casos que presentaron retardo en la consolidación. La lesión del nervio radial previa a la intervención se recuperó de forma progresiva sin requerimiento de transferencias. Los resultados funcionales fueron satisfactorios en un grupo de diez pacientes que completaron más de 1 año de seguimiento. Discusión El abordaje posterior de humero con mínima invasión en el tratamiento de este patrón particular de fracturas parece que muestra una ventaja biológica al permitir una consolidación completa en todos los pacientes. La lesión del nervio radial iatrogénica no parece que aumente en relación con su aislamiento y protección en la porción proximal del tríceps. Nivel de evidencia clínica Nivel IV.

Background Diaphyseal humeral fractures correspond to 3-5% of all fractures. The proportion of these fractures in which the distal third of the diaphysis is involved is variable with estimated incidences between 10-48%. The aim of the study is to evaluate the functional results and rate of fracture consolidation for a group of patients with distal third diaphyseal humeral fractures managed using a minimally invasive technique through a posterior approach. Materials and methods Twenty-two patients (mean age of 36 years) were evaluated between 2013 and 2016. Functional assessment was performed using the DASH abbreviated functional scale. Shoulder and elbow mobility range of motion were measured with goniometry, and pain was measured following the VAS scale. Results All fractures consolidated successfully, with two cases exhibiting delay in consolidation. Radial nerve injury prior to the intervention was progressively recovered without the need for supplementary tendons transfers. Functional results were satisfactory for ten patients that completed more than one year of follow-up. Discussion Minimally invasive technique with posterior approach in the treatment of this particular pattern of humeral fractures seems to show a biological advantage in allowing complete consolidation in all patients. Iatrogenic radial nerve injury does not appear to increase in relation to its isolation and protection in the proximal portion of the triceps. Evidence level IV.

[Posterior corpectomy, transpedicular fixation and expandable cage placement in thoracolumbar fractures]. / Corporectomía por acceso único posterior con colocación de caja expandible y fijación transpedicular en fracturas toracolumbares.

OBJECTIVE: The objective is to evaluate the outcome of vertebral corpectomy and placement of an expandable cage in patients with thoracolumbar fractures, using a posterior-only approach. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective, case series study in the period from May 2011 to May 2014, in which eight patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures were treated surgically with corpectomy of fractured spinal body, placement of expandable box and fixation with transpedicular system, via posterior-only approach. Neurologic examination was done pre- and postoperatively with the ASIA score in a one year span. The angular deformity correction was also measured. RESULTS: The mean age was 38 years (24 to 58 years); five male and three female patients. All the patients had burst fracture, one of them with aggregate rotational component. Only one vertebral level was worked with corpectomy in all patients. Mean surgical time was 236 minutes (195-330 min). Mean surgical bleeding was 1,731 ml. CONCLUSION /DISCUSSION: Patients who underwent posterior approach corpectomy showed favorable clinical results. None presented neurological damage or surgical-related injury. This technique can be a useful option to avoid complications related to anterior vertebral approach or double approach.

OBJETIVO: Evaluar el resultado de la corporectomía por acceso único posterior con colocación de caja expandible y fijación transpedicular en pacientes con fracturas toracolumbares. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudio retrospectivo en el que se evaluaron ocho pacientes con fracturas por estallido entre Mayo de 2011 y Mayo de 2014, quienes fueron tratados de manera quirúrgica mediante corporectomía, colocación de caja expandible y fijación transpedicular con abordaje posterior. El estado neurológico fue valorado a través de la escala de ASIA prequirúrgico y postquirúrgico a un año de evolución y se midió la corrección angular de las deformidades. RESULTADOS: El estudio comprendió cinco personas de sexo masculino y tres de sexo femenino, con un promedio de edad de 38 años (de 24 a 58 años). Todos los pacientes presentaron fracturas por estallido del cuerpo vertebral, uno de ellos con componente rotacional. A los ocho se les realizó solamente la corporectomía de un nivel vertebral. El tiempo quirúrgico promedio fue de 236 minutos (rango: 195-330 min). El sangrado quirúrgico en promedio fue de 1,731 ml. CONCLUSIÓN/DISCUSIÓN: Los pacientes que se sometieron a corporectomía por vía posterior mostraron resultados clínicos favorables, sin presentar lesiones neurológicas o lesiones asociadas al procedimiento, por lo que esta técnica puede ser una opción terapéutica al disminuir las complicaciones de una vía anterior o de un doble abordaje.

Corporectomía por acceso único posterior con colocación de caja expandible y fijación transpedicular en fracturas toracolumbares / Posterior corpectomy, transpedicular fixation and expandable cage placement in thoracolumbar fractures

Resumen: Objetivo: Evaluar el resultado de la corporectomía por acceso único posterior con colocación de caja expandible y fijación transpedicular en pacientes con fracturas toracolumbares. Material y métodos: Estudio retrospectivo en el que se evaluaron ocho pacientes con fracturas por estallido entre Mayo de 2011 y Mayo de 2014, quienes fueron tratados de manera quirúrgica mediante corporectomía, colocación de caja expandible y fijación transpedicular con abordaje posterior. El estado neurológico fue valorado a través de la escala de ASIA prequirúrgico y postquirúrgico a un año de evolución y se midió la corrección angular de las deformidades. Resultados: El estudio comprendió cinco personas de sexo masculino y tres de sexo femenino, con un promedio de edad de 38 años (de 24 a 58 años). Todos los pacientes presentaron fracturas por estallido del cuerpo vertebral, uno de ellos con componente rotacional. A los ocho se les realizó solamente la corporectomía de un nivel vertebral. El tiempo quirúrgico promedio fue de 236 minutos (rango: 195-330 min). El sangrado quirúrgico en promedio fue de 1,731 ml. Conclusión/Discusión: Los pacientes que se sometieron a corporectomía por vía posterior mostraron resultados clínicos favorables, sin presentar lesiones neurológicas o lesiones asociadas al procedimiento, por lo que esta técnica puede ser una opción terapéutica al disminuir las complicaciones de una vía anterior o de un doble abordaje.

Abstract: Objective: The objective is to evaluate the outcome of vertebral corpectomy and placement of an expandable cage in patients with thoracolumbar fractures, using a posterior-only approach. Material and methods: A retrospective, case series study in the period from May 2011 to May 2014, in which eight patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures were treated surgically with corpectomy of fractured spinal body, placement of expandable box and fixation with transpedicular system, via posterior-only approach. Neurologic examination was done pre- and postoperatively with the ASIA score in a one year span. The angular deformity correction was also measured. Results: The mean age was 38 years (24 to 58 years); five male and three female patients. All the patients had burst fracture, one of them with aggregate rotational component. Only one vertebral level was worked with corpectomy in all patients. Mean surgical time was 236 minutes (195-330 min). Mean surgical bleeding was 1,731 ml. Conclusion/Discussion: Patients who underwent posterior approach corpectomy showed favorable clinical results. None presented neurological damage or surgical-related injury. This technique can be a useful option to avoid complications related to anterior vertebral approach or double approach.

Management of degenerative cervical myelopathy - An update / Manejo da mielopatia cervical degeneratiiva - Uma atualização

SUMMARY Introduction Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is the most common cause of spinal cord dysfunction in adult patients. Patients generally present with a slow, progressive neurological decline or a stepwise deterioration pattern. In this paper, we discuss the most important factors involved in the management of DCM, including a discussion about the surgical approaches. Method The authors performed an extensive review of the peer-reviewed literature addressing the aforementioned objectives. Results Although the diagnosis is clinical, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the study of choice to confirm stenosis and also to exclude the differential diagnosis. The severity the clinical symptoms of DCM are evaluated by different scales, but the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) and the Nürick scale are probably the most commonly used. Spontaneous clinical improvement is rare and surgery is the main treatment form in an attempt to prevent further neurological deterioration and, potentially, to provide some improvement in symptoms and function. Anterior, posterior or combined cervical approaches are used to decompress the spinal cord, with adjunctive fusion being commonly performed. The choice of one approach over the other depends on patient characteristics (such as number of involved levels, site of compression, cervical alignment, previous surgeries, bone quality, presence of instability, among others) as well as surgeon preference and experience. Conclusion Spine surgeons must understand the advantages and disadvantages of all surgical techniques to choose the best procedure for their patients. Further comparative studies are necessary to establish the superiority of one approach over the other when multiple options are available.

RESUMO Introdução a mielopatia cervical degenerativa (MCD) é uma das causas mais comuns de disfunção medular em adultos. Os pacientes em geral apresentam declínio neurológico lento e progressivo, ou deterioração escalonada. No presente artigo, discutimos os mais importantes fatores envolvidos no manejo da MCD, incluindo considerações sobre os aspectos relacionados à escolha da abordagem cirúrgica. Método realizou-se extensa revisão da literatura de artigos peer-reviewed relacionados ao tema. Resultados embora o diagnóstico seja realizado clinicamente, a ressonância magnética (RM) é o estudo de imagem de escolha para confirmá-lo e excluir eventuais diagnósticos diferenciais. A gravidade do quadro clínico pode ser avaliado utilizando-se diferentes escalas, como a modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) ou a de Nürick, provavelmente as mais comuns. Uma vez que a melhora clínica espontânea é rara, a cirurgia é a principal forma de tratamento, em uma tentativa de evitar dano neurológico adicional ou deterioração e, potencialmente, aliviar alguns sintomas e melhorar a função dos pacientes. Abordagens cirúrgicas por via anterior, posterior ou combinada podem ser usadas para descomprimir o canal, concomitantemente a técnicas de fusão. A escolha da abordagem depende das características dos pacientes (número de segmentos envolvidos, local de compressão, alinhamento cervical, cirurgias prévias, qualidade óssea, presença de instabilidade, entre outras), além da preferência e experiência do cirurgião. Conclusão os cirurgiões de coluna devem compreender as vantagens e desvantagens de todas as técnicas cirúrgicas para escolher o melhor procedimento para seus pacientes. Estudos futuros comparando as abordagens são necessários para orientar o cirurgião quando múltiplas opções forem possíveis.

Clinical outcome of anterior vs posterior approach for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

OBJECTIVE: The aim is to demonstrate whether there is clinical difference between posterior vs anterior decompression in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. METHODS: Forty-two patient database was obtained from the Centro Medico Nacional de Occidente in Mexico, those who underwent surgical treatment for cervical myelopathy with a mean 1.4 year follow-up. RESULTS: Patients were divided; group A (45%) anterior approach and group B (55%) posterior approach, for mJOA, group A had a lower score compare with group B. While in the Nurick score group B got a higher score compare with group A. CONCLUSIONS: Posterior decompression resulted in better functional outcomes (p < 0.05).

Outcomes of Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis Through a Posterior Achilles Tendon-Splitting Approach.

BACKGROUND: A number of operative approaches have been described to perform a tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis. Here we present the largest reported series of a posterior Achilles tendon-splitting approach for TTC fusion. METHODS: With institutional review board approval, a retrospective review of the TTC fusions performed at a single academic institution was carried out. Orthopedic surgeons specializing in foot and ankle surgery performed all procedures. Eligible patients included all those who underwent a TTC fusion via a posterior approach and had at least a 2-year follow-up. Forty-one patients underwent TTC arthrodesis through a posterior Achilles tendon-splitting approach. Mean age at surgery was 56.9±15.0 years. There were 21 female and 20 male patients. Preoperative diagnoses included arthritis (n = 13 patients), failed total ankle arthroplasty (9), avascular necrosis of the talus (9), prior nonunion of the ankle and/or subtalar joint (6), Charcot neuro-arthropathy (2), and stage IV flatfoot deformity (2). In 37 patients (90.2%), a hindfoot intramedullary arthrodesis nail was used, with posterior plate or supplemental screw augmentation in 17 patients. Posterior plate stabilization alone was utilized in 4 cases (9.8%). RESULTS: The fusion rate was 80.4%. Eight patients developed a nonunion of the subtalar, tibiotalar, or both joints. Complications were observed in 17 patients (41.4%). Of these, ankle nonunion (19.5%), tibial stress fracture (17%), postoperative cellulitis and superficial wound breakdown (9.7%), subtalar nonunion (4.8%), and TTC malunion (2.4%) were the most frequently identified. One patient eventually underwent amputation (2.4%). CONCLUSION: We believe that posterior Achilles tendon-splitting approach for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis was a safe and effective method, with similar union and complications rates to some previously described techniques. We believe the posterior approach is advantageous as it provides simultaneous access to both the ankle and subtalar joints and allows for dissection to occur between angiosomes, which may preserve blood supply to the skin. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective case series.

Cifosis de unión proximal en curvas Lenke 5C. Comparación entre cirugía anterior y cirugía posterior / Proximal junctional kyphosis in lenke c5 curves. A comparison between anterior and posterior surgery

Introducción: El balance sagital es crítico para los resultados a largo plazo en el manejo quirúrgico de la escoliosis idiopática del adolescente. La cifosis de unión se podría definir como un hallazgo radiológico en la transición de la columna fusionada y la columna móvil en pacientes asintomáticos. El objetivo de este trabajo fue comparar la cifosis de unión proximal posoperatoria en curvas Lenke 5C con dos técnicas quirúrgicas distintas: la instrumentación anterior y la instrumentación posterior. Materiales y Métodos: Estudio retrospectivo, controlado no aleatorizado, de 37 pacientes con escoliosis idiopática del adolescente, curvas Lenke 5C con fusión corta, de vértebra límite a vértebra límite. Grupo 1: 18 pacientes con artrodesis anterior instrumentada y Grupo 2: 19 pacientes con artrodesis posterior instrumentada. Los parámetros sagitales radiológicos medidos fueron: 1) línea de plomada de C7, 2) cifosis de unión, 3) cifosis torácica, 4) lordosis lumbar, con un seguimiento mínimo de 2 años. Resultados: Grupo 1: aumento de la cifosis de unión entre el preoperatorio y el seguimiento a los 2 años de 6,27° (p = 0,0002). La incidencia de cifosis de unión patológica fue del 17 por ciento. Grupo 2: aumento de la cifosis de unión entre el preoperatorio y el seguimiento de 4,63° (p = 0,0004). La incidencia de cifosis de unión patológica fue del 16 por ciento. Conclusión: No hubo diferencias significativas entre ambos grupos en la incidencia de cifosis de unión patológica. (AU)

Background: Sagittal balance is critical for long-term results in the surgical handling of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Proximal junctional kyphosis could be defined as a radiographic findings in the fused and mobile spine transition in asymptomatic patients. Objective: To compare post-surgical proximal junctional kyphosis in Lenke C5 curves with two different surgical techniques: anterior and posterior instrumentation. Methods: Retrospective, controlled, non-randomized study of 37 patients with Lenke C5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, with short fusion from end-vertebra to end-vertebra. Group 1: 18 patients with anterior instrumented arthrodesis, and Group 2: 19 patients with posterior instrumented arthrodesis. The radiographic sagittal parameters measured were: 1) plumbline from the C7, 2) junctional kyphosis, 3) thoracic kyphosis, and 4) lumbar lordosis; with a minimum follow-up of two years. Results: Group 1: increase of junctional kyphosis between the preoperative period and a two-year follow-up, 6.27° (p = 0.0002). The incidence of pathologic junctional kyphosis was 17%. Group 2: increase of junctional kyphosis between the preoperative period and the follow- up, 4.63° (p = 0.0004). The incidence of pathologic junctional kyphosis was 16%. Conclusion: There were no significant differences between groups in the incidence of pathologic junctional kyphosis. (AU)

Cifosis de unión proximal en curvas Lenke 5C. Comparación entre cirugía anterior y cirugía posterior / Proximal junctional kyphosis in lenke c5 curves. A comparison between anterior and posterior surgery

Introducción: El balance sagital es crítico para los resultados a largo plazo en el manejo quirúrgico de la escoliosis idiopática del adolescente. La cifosis de unión se podría definir como un hallazgo radiológico en la transición de la columna fusionada y la columna móvil en pacientes asintomáticos. El objetivo de este trabajo fue comparar la cifosis de unión proximal posoperatoria en curvas Lenke 5C con dos técnicas quirúrgicas distintas: la instrumentación anterior y la instrumentación posterior. Materiales y Métodos: Estudio retrospectivo, controlado no aleatorizado, de 37 pacientes con escoliosis idiopática del adolescente, curvas Lenke 5C con fusión corta, de vértebra límite a vértebra límite. Grupo 1: 18 pacientes con artrodesis anterior instrumentada y Grupo 2: 19 pacientes con artrodesis posterior instrumentada. Los parámetros sagitales radiológicos medidos fueron: 1) línea de plomada de C7, 2) cifosis de unión, 3) cifosis torácica, 4) lordosis lumbar, con un seguimiento mínimo de 2 años. Resultados: Grupo 1: aumento de la cifosis de unión entre el preoperatorio y el seguimiento a los 2 años de 6,27° (p = 0,0002). La incidencia de cifosis de unión patológica fue del 17 por ciento. Grupo 2: aumento de la cifosis de unión entre el preoperatorio y el seguimiento de 4,63° (p = 0,0004). La incidencia de cifosis de unión patológica fue del 16 por ciento. Conclusión: No hubo diferencias significativas entre ambos grupos en la incidencia de cifosis de unión patológica.

Background: Sagittal balance is critical for long-term results in the surgical handling of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Proximal junctional kyphosis could be defined as a radiographic findings in the fused and mobile spine transition in asymptomatic patients. Objective: To compare post-surgical proximal junctional kyphosis in Lenke C5 curves with two different surgical techniques: anterior and posterior instrumentation. Methods: Retrospective, controlled, non-randomized study of 37 patients with Lenke C5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, with short fusion from end-vertebra to end-vertebra. Group 1: 18 patients with anterior instrumented arthrodesis, and Group 2: 19 patients with posterior instrumented arthrodesis. The radiographic sagittal parameters measured were: 1) plumbline from the C7, 2) junctional kyphosis, 3) thoracic kyphosis, and 4) lumbar lordosis; with a minimum follow-up of two years. Results: Group 1: increase of junctional kyphosis between the preoperative period and a two-year follow-up, 6.27° (p = 0.0002). The incidence of pathologic junctional kyphosis was 17%. Group 2: increase of junctional kyphosis between the preoperative period and the follow- up, 4.63° (p = 0.0004). The incidence of pathologic junctional kyphosis was 16%. Conclusion: There were no significant differences between groups in the incidence of pathologic junctional kyphosis.

One-stage partial vertebrectomy, titanium mesh implantation and pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures through a posterior approach

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the clinical results of a partial vertebrectomy with titanium mesh implantation and pedicle screw fixation using a posterior approach to reconstruct the spine in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures. METHOD: From January 2006 to August 2008, 20 patients with severe thoracolumbar fractures were treated.For vertebral bodies associated with one injured intervertebral disk, subtotal vertebrectomy surgery and single-segment fusion were performed. For vertebral bodies with two injured adjacent intervertebral disks, partial vertebrectomy surgery and two-segment fusion were performed. RESULTS: All 20 patients were followed up for 12 to 24 months (average of 18 months). There were no complications such as wound infections, hemopneumothorax or abdominal infections in any of the patients. The neurological status of all of the patients was improved by at least one American Spinal Injury Association grade by the last follow-up. The anterior vertebral body height was an average of 50.77% before surgery, 88.51% after surgery and 87.86% at the last follow up; the sagittal Cobb angle was improved, on average, from 26.15° to 5.39° and was 5.90° at the last follow up. The percentage of spinal stenosis was improved, on average, from 26.07% to 4.93%° and was 6.15% at the last follow up. There were significant differences ...