Effect of scapular posterior tilting exercise on scapular muscle activities in men and women with a rounded shoulder posture.

Round-shoulder posture (RSP) is a common postural condition, characterized by protraction, downward rotation, anterior tilting and internal rotation of the scapula. RSP can lead to shoulder dysfunction. Different methods have been proposed for rehabilitating and correcting the altered posture in RSP including stretching, strengthening exercises, and shoulder brace or taping. However, the findings are controversial and studies are ongoing to develop more effective method. The present study is aimed at investigating the effects of scapular posterior tilting (SPT) exercise in different support positions on scapular muscle activities in men and women with RSP. In a prospective observational clinical study, we assessed demographic, basic clinical parameters and study variables of the subjects with RSP (n = 20) (men/women = 9/11) attending Daegu University in Gyeongsan, South Korea. To do so, we compared electromyographic (EMG) activities of lower trapezius and serratus anterior muscles between men and women with RSP during SPT exercise on four different support surfaces to determine any difference in the EMG activities. The results revealed that women showed significant differences in EMG activities in the lower and left upper trapezius and serratus anterior muscles, while men showed significant differences in EMG activity only in the lower trapezius muscle during SPT exercise on four different surfaces (P < 0.05). The post-hoc analysis revealed significantly greater EMG activity values in the lower trapezius and serratus anterior muscles during SPT exercise on the upper body unstable surface and whole-body unstable surface (p < 0.05). Independent t-tests after the Bonferroni correction showed no significant differences in muscle activities between men and women on the four different surfaces (p > 0.0125).

Management of Garden-I and II Femoral Neck Fractures: Perspectives on Primary Arthroplasty.

This review compares internal fixation versus arthroplasty in the treatment of nondisplaced femoral neck fractures (FNFs) calling attention to evolving areas of consensus that influence clinical decision-making. The Garden classification system, typically dichotomized into nondisplaced (types I and II) and displaced (types III and IV) fractures, has been used as a guide for surgical decision-making. Conventionally, treatment of nondisplaced FNF in the elderly has been with internal fixation, and treatment of a displaced FNF has been hemi-, or more recently total hip, arthroplasty. Studies over the last decade have raised concern over the appropriate treatment of nondisplaced FNFs due to high rates of reoperation of nondisplaced FNFs treated with internal fixation. Avascular necrosis (AVN), failure of internal fixation, secondary malunion, and pin/nail penetration through the femoral head have all been observed. Several studies have attributed fixation failure to a degree of femoral neck tilt ≥20°, either posteriorly or anteriorly as seen on the lateral X-ray. Because of these observations of fixation failures, the suggestion has been made that arthroplasty be used when the degree of posterior tilt exceeds a threshold of ≥20° tilt with the expectation of diminishing failure of fixation, decreasing the risk of reoperation and preserving function without increasing mortality rate. Frustrating additional analyses are uncertainties over the mechanisms of failure of internal fixation with ≥20° tilt and the persistently substantial 1-year mortality rate after FNF, which has not been influenced by fixation or replacement type. Due to the lack of consensus regarding the determination of the appropriate surgical intervention for nondisplaced FNFs, an improved algorithm for surgical decision-making for these fractures may prove useful.

What is the Fate of Undisplaced Femoral Neck Fractures Treated With Cannulated Screws?

BACKGROUND: We aimed to report implant survival in Garden type I and II femoral neck fractures treated with cannulated screws in elderly patients. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 232 consecutive unilateral Garden I and II patients (232 fractures) treated with cannulated screws. Mean age was 81 years (range, 65 to 100), and a body mass index of 25 (range, 15.8 to 38.3). No between-group differences were found in demographic variables and/or baseline measurements (P > .05). Mean follow-up was 36 months (range, 1 to 171). Two observers measured baseline radiographic variables with good-to-excellent interobserver reliability. The posterior tilt angle, measured on a cross-table lateral x-ray, was used to classify the cohort into <20° (n = 183) and ≥20° (n = 49). The cumulative incidence with competing risk analysis was used to predict association between posterior tilt and subsequent conversion to arthroplasty. Patient survival was calculated with the Kaplan-Meier estimate. RESULTS: Implant survival was 86.3% (95% confidence interval (CI) 80 to 90) at 12 months and 77.3% (95% CI 64 to 86) at 70 months. The 12-month cumulative incidence failure was 12.6% (95% CI 8 to 17). After controlling for confounders, posterior tilt ≥20° had higher risk of subsequent arthroplasty when compared to posterior tilt <20° (38.8 [95% CI 25 to 52] versus 5% [95% CI 2.8 to 9], subhazard ratio 8.3, 95% CI 3.8 to 18), without any other radiologic or demographic factor being associated with failure. Patient survival was 88.2% (95% CI 83 to 91.7) at 12 months, 79.5% (95% CI 73 to 84) at 24 months, and 57% (95% CI 48 to 65) at 70 months. CONCLUSION: Cannulated screws were a reliable treatment for Garden I and II fractures, except when there was posterior tilt ≥20°, where arthroplasty should be considered.

[Research progress of caput femoris posterior tilt and its impact on prognosis in nondisplaced femoral neck fractures].

There are still many unresolved problems in the treatment and prognosis of nondisplaced femoral neck fractures, such as nonunion and avascular necrosis of the caput femoris .In order to reduce the risk of various complications after non-displaced femoral neck fractures, the caput femoris posterior tilt of femoral neck fractures and its impact on prognosis have attracted more and more attention. A large number of scholars' studies have found that when the posterior tilt exceeds 20°, the risk of internal fixation failure increases significantly. Based on this concept, we can choose to use primary artificial joint replacement instead of three-screw internal fixation according to the different posterior tilt angles of patients to reduce the incidence of postoperative complications. At the same time, our analysis found that comminution of the posterior segment of the femoral neck would lead to an increase in the posterior inclination angles. The purpose of this review was to investigate the relationship between caput femoris posterior tilt of femoral neck fractures and surgical outcome, and to introduce a new method for measuring caput femoris posterior tilt of the femoral neck.

Biomechanical analysis of fixation strength at different nailing angles for femoral neck fracture with insufficient reduction.

To analyze the fixation strength of cannulated screws fixation in the treatment of femoral neck fracture with posterior tilt due to insufficient reduction. Two sets of digital models of anatomical reduction and 15° tilting reduction were established by CT data. Each group of models was modeled with two different fixation methods. One fixation method was fixed according to the standard cannulated screws recommended by AO. Another fixation method is to tilt the screw posterior tilt 15°. The final four groups of models were obtained: AO principle nailing posterior tilt model (Group A), posterior direction nailing posterior tilt model (Group B), AO principle nailing anatomic reduction model (Group C) and posterior direction nailing anatomic reduction model (Group D). The maximum displacement of the fracture end, the maximum Von-Mises stress and the stress distribution of the internal fixation were compared among the four groups. Four groups of models were established on artificial bone by 3D printing guide plate technology. The 600 N pressure test and yield test were performed on a biomechanical machine. The finite element and biomechanical models showed that groups B and C were more stable than groups A and D. The stability of group B was not worse than that of group C. When the femoral neck fracture produces a posterior tilt, a posterior reduction is allowed. The change of AO screw to posterior tilting screw fixation has more powerful advantages. No posterior tilt or posterior reduction, AO screw placement is still required.

The association between three-dimensional measurement of posterior tilt angle in impacted femoral neck fractures and osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

BACKGROUND: Hollow screw internal fixation is commonly used in clinical treatment of impacted femoral neck fractures. Previous studies have demonstrated a correlation between the preoperative posterior tilt angle of the femoral head and failure of internal fixation, but there are fewer studies related to the occurrence of postoperative femoral head necrosis and the posterior tilt angle. METHODS: To examine the relationship between three-dimensional posterior tilt angle measurements in affected femoral neck fractures and postoperative osteonecrosis of the femoral head and related risk variables. We retrospectively examined 130 Yantaishan Hospital patients with affected femoral neck fractures from 2019 to 2022. Three-dimensional reconstruction technology assessed the posterior tilt angle of the femoral head and separated patients into necrosis and non-necrosis groups based on postoperative femoral head necrosis. Univariate analysis compared clinical data between groups, and multivariate logistic regression analyzed risk variables for femoral head necrosis. Postoperative femoral head necrosis was predicted by posterior tilt angle using Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: Out of 130 patients who were followed up for 16-68 months postoperatively, 20 developed femoral head necrosis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that the posterior tilt angle and reduction quality level C were risk factors for the occurrence of femoral head necrosis. The ROC curve analysis showed that the three-dimensional measurement of the posterior tilt angle had predictive value for postoperative femoral head necrosis, with a cut-off value of 20.6°. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that, for patients with impacted femoral neck fractures, the posterior tilt angle and reduction quality level C are risk factors for femoral head necrosis following closed reduction and internal fixation surgery. Fracture patients with a posterior tilt angle ≥ 20.6°are more likely to experience postoperative femoral head necrosis.

Preoperative posterior tilt can be a risk factor of fixation failure in nondisplaced femoral neck fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify whether posterior tilt increases the risk of treatment failure in nondisplaced femoral neck fractures. METHODS: We searched the databases of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from 1980 to 2022. The search strategy was based on the combination of keywords "nondisplaced," "hip fracture," "femoral neck fracture," and "internal fixation." Cohort studies enrolled patients with nondisplaced (Garden I and Garden II) femoral neck fractures were included. Two investigators independently extracted data and the other two assessed the methodological quality. Data were analyzed using Review Manager software. RESULTS: We analyzed 13 cohort trials with a pooled sample of 4818 patients, with posterior tilt ≥ 20° in 698 patients and < 20° in 3578 patients in 11 trials, and posterior tilt ≥ 10° in 483 patients and < 10° in 496 patients in 4 trials. All studies were of high quality based on Newcastle-Ottawa Scale evaluation. Treatment failure was reported in 24.4% (170/698) of patients with posterior tilt ≥ 20° and 10.9% (392/3578) of patients with posterior tilt < 20°, indicating that posterior tilt ≥ 20° was significantly associated with a higher risk of treatment failure (Risk ratio, 2.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.77-4.21). Posterior tilt ≥ 10° was not found to be a risk factor for fixation failure (risk ratio, 1.92; 95% CI 0.76-4.83). CONCLUSION: Nondisplaced femoral neck fractures with posterior tilt ≥ 20° were associated with an increasing rate of failure when treated with internal fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE : III, Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Reliability of the assessment of scapular posterior tilt angle using the smartphone and scapular movement during arm elevation in healthy individuals and patients with frozen shoulder: a cross-sectional study.

Background: Frozen shoulders are associated with abnormal scapular movements. However, scapular posterior tilt movement in frozen shoulders has not been investigated using simple clinical methods. This study aimed to clarify the reliability of scapular posterior tilting movement using a smartphone and scapular posterior tilting movement in healthy individuals and patients with frozen shoulder. Methods: The participants were 22 healthy young (age 25.9 ± 4.1 years), 22 healthy middle-aged (age 52.6 ± 4.4 years), and 37 individuals with frozen shoulder (age 56.0 ± 7.0 years). Scapular posterior tilting movement was measured at shoulder flexion 0° (0° posterior tilt), shoulder flexion 90° (90° posterior tilt), and scapular tilt excursion using a smartphone. The intrarater reliability was calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (1, 3). Results: Intrarater reliability at 0° posterior tilt and 90° posterior tilt was 0.76 and 0.84, respectively. The 0° posterior tilt was not significantly different among the three groups (P = .90). The 90° posterior tilt was not significantly different among the three groups (P = .06). The scapular tilt excursions were significantly greater in the frozen shoulder group than in the middle-aged group (P = .03). Conclusion: Measurement of scapular posterior tilting movement using a smartphone was highly reliable. The frozen shoulder might compensate for the limited arm elevation of the glenohumeral joint by scapular posterior tilting movement.

"In-Out-In" Percutaneous Reduction Technique for Treatment of Valgus-Impacted Femoral Neck Fractures: A Technical Trick and Case Series.

OBJECTIVE: Valgus-impacted femoral neck fractures with or without posterior tilt of the femoral head are very common and full of pitfalls in clinical practice, which may lead to femoral neck shortening (FNS) and avascular necrosis (AVN). The study tries to introduce a novel technical trick aiming at anatomical reduction of valgus-impacted femoral neck fracture with minimally invasive procedure, and summarize the clinical prognosis in case series. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 24 patients (seven men and 17 women) with valgus-impacted femoral neck fractures between May 2017 and July 2020 were managed by "in-out-in" percutaneous reduction technique (percutaneous reduction group). Another 24 cases (10 men and 14 women) suffering the fractures underwent in situ fixation were enrolled as control group for function comparison (in situ fixation group). All patients were followed up for 24-42 months. The clinical outcomes included complications after operations (χ2 test) and Harris Hip Score (HHS) for hip function (unpaired t test) in the two groups. The radiographic outcomes were evaluated by collodiaphyseal angle, posterior tilt angle, and FNS before the operation and during the follow-up in the percutaneous reduction group (unpaired t test). RESULTS: Patients' preoperative data, including age, sex, affected side, fracture types, and medical history, were similar between the two groups, respectively (p > 0.05). After surgery, the mean HHS at 6, 12, and 24 months were all better in the percutaneous reduction group (76 ± 6.72, 85.34 ± 6.33 and 90.54 ± 5.81) than that in the in situ fixation group (70.86 ± 6.91, 80 ± 6.11 and 84.1 ± 7.82), respectively (p < 0.05). One patient suffered fixation failure with screws retreat and one patient suffered AVN in the percutaneous reduction group. In the in situ fixation group, AVN occurred in two patients at last follow-up. There was no significant difference in complication amounts between the two groups (p > 0.05). In the percutaneous reduction group, collodiaphyseal angle, posterior tilt angle, and amount of FNS were significantly different between preoperative cases and immediately postoperative cases (p < 0.05). However, there was no statistical difference of the measurements among postoperative cases at different time points (within 24 h, 6 months, and 2 years postoperatively) (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our experience of the technique and the case series show that "in-out-in" percutaneous reduction technique for treatment of valgus-impacted femoral neck fracture with or without posterior tilt of the femoral head is safe and effective for achieving successful bone union and satisfactory function.

Research progress of caput femoris posterior tilt and its impact on prognosis in nondisplaced femoral neck fractures / 中国骨伤

There are still many unresolved problems in the treatment and prognosis of nondisplaced femoral neck fractures, such as nonunion and avascular necrosis of the caput femoris .In order to reduce the risk of various complications after non-displaced femoral neck fractures, the caput femoris posterior tilt of femoral neck fractures and its impact on prognosis have attracted more and more attention. A large number of scholars' studies have found that when the posterior tilt exceeds 20°, the risk of internal fixation failure increases significantly. Based on this concept, we can choose to use primary artificial joint replacement instead of three-screw internal fixation according to the different posterior tilt angles of patients to reduce the incidence of postoperative complications. At the same time, our analysis found that comminution of the posterior segment of the femoral neck would lead to an increase in the posterior inclination angles. The purpose of this review was to investigate the relationship between caput femoris posterior tilt of femoral neck fractures and surgical outcome, and to introduce a new method for measuring caput femoris posterior tilt of the femoral neck.

Ratio between 3D glenohumeral and scapulothoracic motions in individuals without shoulder pain.

This study determined the ratio between glenohumeral and three-dimensional scapular motion during arm elevation and lowering in 91 individuals without shoulder pain. Scapular kinematics were assessed using an electromagnetic tracking device. Individuals performed 3 repetitions of elevation and lowering of the arm in the sagittal plane. Two-way ANOVAs (interval: 30-60°, 60-90°, 90-120° x phase: elevation and lowering) and paired t-tests were used for data analysis. For scapular internal/external rotation, lesser scapular internal rotation contribution was found during the 60-90° interval as compared to the 90-60° interval. Lesser scapular external rotation was identified in the 60-30° interval of arm lowering. The ratio was greater during arm elevation (1.89) compared to lowering (1.74) across the entire motion arc. For scapular upward rotation, greater upward rotation contribution was observed during arm elevation at the 30-60° interval, and less scapular downward rotation contribution in the final range of arm lowering. For scapular tilt, lesser scapular posterior tilt contribution during arm elevation was observed compared to arm lowering. The ratios between glenohumeral elevation/lowering and each individual scapulothoracic motion showed either differences between intervals and/or between elevation and lowering during specific intervals in healthy individuals.

Addressing posterior tilt displacement during surgery to lower failure risk of sub-capital Garden types 1 and 2 femoral fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Sub-capital femoral fractures (SCFF) are impacted or non-displaced in Garden types 1 and 2, respectively. Non-surgical treatment is protected weight-bearing combined with physiotherapy and radiographic follow-up in selected patients. Traditionally, in situ pinning is the surgical treatment of choice. The aim of this study was to estimate whether the valgus deformity in Garden types 1 and 2 (AO classification 31B1.1 and 31B1.2) SCFF is a virtual perception of a posterior tilt deformity and if addressing this deformity improves patients' outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The records of 96 patients with Garden Types 1 and 2 SCFF treated in tertiary medical center between 1/2014 and 9/2017 were retrospectively reviewed. They all had preoperative hip joint anteroposterior and lateral radiographic views. 75 patients had additional computed tomography (CT) scans. Femoral head displacement was measured on an anteroposterior and axial radiograph projections and were performed before and after surgery. Preoperative 3D reconstructions were performed for a better fracture characterization, and assessment of the imaging was performed by the first author. RESULTS: The average age of the study cohort was 73 years (range 28-96, 68% females). There were 58 right-sided and 38 left-sided fractures. Ninety patients had Type 1 and six patients had Type 2 fractures. The average preoperative posterior tilt was 15 degrees and the average valgus displacement was 10 degrees on plain radiographs compared to 28 degrees and 11 degrees, respectively, on CT scans. Posterior tilt was found with a virtual perception as valgus-impacted fractures. The postoperative posterior tilt was corrected to an average of 3 degrees and the valgus displacement to 5 degrees. CONCLUSION: CT provides an accurate modality for measuring femoral head displacement and fracture extent. The posterior tilt displacement should be addressed during surgery to lower failure risk and the need for additional procedures. IRB APPROVAL: TLV-0292-15. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

More than 20° posterior tilt of the femoral head in undisplaced femoral neck fractures results in a four times higher risk of treatment failure.

PURPOSE: In this study, we aimed to determine the correlation between the preoperative posterior tilt of the femoral head and treatment failure in patients with a Garden type I and II femoral neck fracture (FNF) treated with the dynamic locking blade plate (DLBP). METHODS: Preoperative posterior tilt was measured in a prospective documented cohort of 193 patients with a Garden type I and II FNF treated with the DLBP. The correlation between preoperative posterior tilt and failure, defined as revision surgery because of avascular necrosis, non-union, or cut-out, was analyzed. RESULTS: Patients with failed fracture treatment (5.5%) had a higher degree of posterior tilt on the initial radiograph than the patients with uneventful healed fractures: 21.4° and 13.8°, respectively (p = 0.03). The failure rate was 3.2% for Garden type I and II FNF with a posterior tilt < 20° and 12.5% if the preoperative posterior tilt was ≥ 20°. A posterior tilt of ≥ 20° was associated with an odds ratio of 4.24 (95% CI 1.09-16.83; p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Garden type I and II FNFs with a significant preoperative posterior tilt (≥ 20°) seem to behave like unstable fractures and have a four times higher risk of failure. Preoperative posterior tilt ≥ 20° of the femoral head should be considered as a significant predictor for failure of treatment in Garden type I and II FNFs treated with the DLBP.

Reliability of the Garden Alignment Index and Valgus Tilt Measurement for Nondisplaced Femoral Neck Fractures.

Anteroposterior (AP) alignment assessment for nondisplaced femoral neck fractures is important for determining the treatment strategy and predicting postoperative outcomes. AP alignment is generally measured using the Garden alignment index (GAI). However, its reliability remains unknown. We compared the reliability of GAI and a new AP alignment measurement (valgus tilt measurement [VTM]) using preoperative AP radiographs of nondisplaced femoral neck fractures. The study was designed as an intra- and inter-rater reliability analysis. The raters were four trauma surgeons who assessed 50 images twice. The main outcome was the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). To calculate intra- and inter-rater reliability, we used a mixed-effects model considering rater, patient, and time. The overall ICC (95% CI) of GAI and VTM for intra-rater reliability was 0.92 (0.89−0.94) and 0.86 (0.82−0.89), respectively. The overall ICC of GAI and VTM for inter-rater reliability was 0.92 (0.89−0.95), and 0.85 (0.81−0.88), respectively. The intra- and inter-rater reliability of GAI was higher in patients aged <80 years than in patients aged ≥80 years. Our results showed that GAI is a more reliable measurement method than VTM, although both are reliable. Variations in patient age should be considered in GAI measurements.

Effects of Intended Scapular Posterior Tilt Motion on Trapezius Muscle Electromyography Activity.

The intended scapular motion is a strategy to strengthen the lower trapezius (LT). However, few studies have explored the effects of the intended scapular posterior tilt motion on selective LT activation. Thus, the present study investigated the effect of the intended scapular posterior tilt on the electromyography (EMG) activity of trapezius muscles during prone shoulder horizontal abduction (PSHA). Eighteen asymptomatic men performed three types of PSHA: (1) preferred PSHA, (2) PSHA with the intended scapular posterior tilt, and (3) PSHA with the intended scapular posterior tilt and trunk extension. EMG activity of the upper trapezius (UT), middle trapezius (MT), and LT were measured during PSHAs. Scapular posterior tilt angle, with and without the intended scapular posterior tilt, were measured using inclinometer. The results indicated that LT muscle activity increased when scapular posterior tilt was applied with and without trunk extension (14-16%), compared to the preferred condition, during PSHA (p < 0.05). However, the addition of trunk extension to PSHA with the intended scapular posterior tilt increased the UT muscle activity (28%) and the UT/LT (29%) and UT/MT (31%) ratios (p < 0.05). The scapular posterior tilt angle was higher (15%) when applying the intended scapular posterior tilt (p = 0.020). These findings suggest that the intended scapular posterior tilt may be a useful strategy for selective LT muscle activation.

Preoperative Posterior Tilt Increases the Risk of Later Conversion to Arthroplasty After Osteosynthesis for Femoral Neck Fracture.

BACKGROUND: Femoral neck fractures (FNFs) are one of the most common injuries in the elderly. Treatment is either internal fixation or primary arthroplasty. The main aim of this study is to assess the risk factors associated with fixation failure leading to further arthroplasty in FNFs treated with cannulated screws. METHODS: Data on internal fixations of FNFs performed at Turku University Hospital between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2017 were collected retrospectively from the patient database. Radiographical measurements were performed for preoperative displacement and posterior tilt, postoperative displacement, reduction quality, and implant shaft angle. RESULTS: Altogether 301 cases were included in the study. The overall reoperation rate was 25% and conversion to arthroplasty was performed in 16% of cases. In the multiple variant analysis, adjusted for age and gender, nondisplaced fractures with a 0°-20° preoperative posterior tilt had a significantly lower risk of later conversion to arthroplasty than did nondisplaced fractures with a ≤0° or ≥20° posterior tilt (odds ratio [OR] 4.0, 95% confidence interval [Cl] 1.8-8.6, P = .0005) and displaced fractures (OR 7.2, 95% CI 3.0-17.4, P < .0001). No statistically significant association was found between preoperatively nondisplaced fractures with a <0° or ≥20° posterior tilt and displaced fractures (OR 0.6, 95% Cl 0.2-1.3, P = .2). CONCLUSION: Displaced fractures and fractures with a preoperative posterior tilt of <0° or ≥20° have a considerably increased risk of reoperation and conversion to arthroplasty. Primary arthroplasty should be considered as treatment for displaced FNFs and fractures with >20° or <0° posterior tilt, especially in fragile patients, to avoid further operations.

Reliability of scapular upward rotation and anterior-posterior tilt measurements using a modified digital inclinometer in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome.

BACKGROUD: Reliable scapular upward rotation and anterior-posterior tilt data are required for patients with subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS). Only a few studies have explored the reliability of such measurements derived using a modified inclinometer. OBJECTIVES: To determine the relative and absolute reliability of scapular upward rotation and anterior-posterior tilt measurements derived using a modified digital inclinometer in patients with SIS. METHOD: Seventeen SIS patients were assessed twice within 1 week. We determined the relative and absolute measurement reliability by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Both intra- and interrater reliability were determined. RESULTS: The intra-rater reliability (both measurements) was high (0.72-0.88), and the interrater ICC was high to excellent (0.72-0.98). Clinically acceptable SEM and MCID values were obtained for scapular upward rotation (SEM: 4.28-9.33∘, MCID: 5.1-11.3∘) and anterior-posterior tilt (SEM: 3.72-7.55∘, MCID: 2.5-10.8∘). CONCLUSIONS: Measurements of scapular upward rotation and anterior-posterior tilt using a modified digital inclinometer reliably reveal scapular position and kinematics in patients with SIS.

A three-dimensional measurement based on CT for the posterior tilt with ideal inter-and intra-observer reliability in non-displaced femoral neck fractures.

Posterior tilt is associated with prognosis of non-displaced femoral neck fractures (FNFs). Knowledge of their association is critical and informs surgeons whether to choose internal fixation or arthroplasty in treatment of non-displaced FNFs. This study aimed to design a novel three-dimensional (3D) posterior tilt measurement and evaluate the intra- and inter-observer variability compared to two-dimensional (2D) measurement proposed by Palm. We hypothesized that 3D measurement would be more accurate and realistic with higher reliability. To test the hypothesis, three observers measured the posterior tilt on the radiographs of 50 non-displaced FNFs, twice with both methods. Intra- and inter-observer reliability for each measurement method used were determined. The measured angle was divided into two categories, at the cut-off of 20° for clinical practice simulation. Intra- and inter-observer reliability were identified for clinical effectiveness. The results indicated that inter- and intra-observer reliability for 3D measurement and its classification was almost perfect with an intraclass coefficient of 0.995 (0.994) and a kappa value of 0.927(0.947), respectively. Conversely, a substantial inter- and intra-observer reliability for the 2D measurement was obtained with an interclass coefficient of 0.764 as well as an intraclass coefficient of 0.773. The clinical validity for 2D measurement showed slight inter-reliability and moderate intra-reliability with a kappa value of 0.192 and 0.587, respectively. Hence, the novel 3D measurement appears to be more reliable with a strong inter- and intra-observer reliability measurement. Further clinical studies are needed to carry out to validate this hypothesis.

Anterior positioning screw in proximal femoral plating restricts posterior tilt of retroverted femoral neck fractures: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative posterior tilt is a risk factor for fixation failure in femoral neck fractures. This study aimed to evaluate the configuration of anterior positioning screw in proximal femoral plating in the treatment of retroverted femoral neck fractures in terms of resisting posterior tilt. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients with retroverted femoral neck fractures who were fixed by proximal femoral plating from January 2014 to August 2019. All patients were divided into two groups according to screw configuration: anterior long-threaded screw (ALTS, n = 36) and normally short-threaded screws (NTS, n = 46). Baseline characteristics were reviewed and radiological and clinical outcomes were analyzed. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for developing posterior tilt. RESULTS: Age, gender, Garden classification, posterior comminution, and reduction quality showed no significant difference between the groups. Increased posterior tilt was lower in the ALTS group (3.2°, 2.1-4.3°) than that in the NTS group (5.3°, 4.2-8.3°) (p < 0.001), and the percentage of people with > 5° of posterior tilt was also lower in the ALTS group (5, 13.9% vs. 24, 52.2%; p < 0.001). Femoral neck shortening (FNS) was lower in the ALTS group (3.1 (2.1-4.7) mm vs. 4.3 (3.1-6.3) mm, p = 0.003), though not statistically significant when using 5 mm as the cut-off value. Harris Hip Score in the ALTS group was higher than that in the NTS group (87.0, 84.0-90.0 vs. 82.0, 76.0-84.5; p < 0.001). Postoperative complications including delayed union, nonunion, and avascular necrosis were comparable between the groups. Multivariable analysis identified posterior comminution (OR 15.9, 95% CI 3.6-70.3, p < 0.001), suboptimal reduction quality (OR 12.0, 95% CI 2.6-56.1, p = 0.002), and NTS configuration (reference: ALTS configuration) (OR 21.9, 95% CI 4.1-116.4, p < 0.001) as risk factors for developing posterior tilt. CONCLUSIONS: Configuration of anterior positioning screw in proximal femoral plating provides better resistance against posterior tilt in the fixation of retroverted femoral neck fractures. Also, posterior comminution, suboptimal reduction, and NTS configuration (reference: ALTS) are risk factors for developing posterior tilt. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial registration number was ChiCTR2000039482 .

Role of preoperative posterior tilt on the outcomes of internal fixation of non-displaced femoral neck fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: There has been an increased interest in the role of preoperative posterior tilt, as measured on lateral radiographs, on the outcomes of internal fixation of non-displaced femoral neck fractures (FNF). The goal was to assess the available evidence for this in the literature. PATIENTS AND METHODS: PRISMA guidelines were followed. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane were searched on June 10th, 2020 for studies assessing the role of posterior tilt on outcomes of internal fixation of non-displaced FNF. Primary outcomes were non-union and fixation failure, avascular necrosis (AVN), treatment failure, and reoperation (excluding symptomatic hardware removal). Outcomes were reported in Odds Ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals [CI]. RESULTS: Fourteen studies and 3729 patients were included (mean age 76 years, 72% female, mean follow-up 25 months). Moderate evidence was noted for the following: patients with greater preoperative posterior tilt had an increased risk of non-union and fixation failure (OR 2.4 [1.3 - 4.3]; p = 0.006), no increased risk of AVN (p = 0.550), an increased risk of treatment failure (OR 6.0 [2.2 - 15.9]; p<0.001) and reoperation (OR 2.5 [1.4 - 4.4]; p = 0.002). Furthermore, a greater preoperative tilt of 9.0° [4.1° - 13.9°] for treatment failure and 6.1° [3.7° - 8.5°] (p<0.001) for reoperation were noted in the unsuccessfully treated groups when compared to the successfully treated groups. Four studies found a threshold for posterior tilt ranging from 7° to 20° CONCLUSION: There is moderate evidence that patients with non-displaced FNF and greater tilt have an increased risk of unsuccessful outcomes following internal fixation. Older patients with a preoperative tilt of ≥20° might benefit from arthroplasty surgery, although studies assessing the optimal threshold are needed.