Reproductive outcomes after laparoscopic resection of symptomatic niches in uterine cesarean scars: Long-term follow-up on the prospective LAPNICHE study.

INTRODUCTION: After incomplete healing of the uterine cesarean section scar, a niche can be observed; 24% of the women develop large niches with a residual myometrial thickness <3 mm. In these cases a laparoscopic resection is possible. The effect of this new treatment on fertility outcome is not known yet. This paper describes reproductive outcomes 2 years after a laparoscopic niche resection and compares women with or without secondary infertility at baseline. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed, with consecutive inclusion of women between 2011 and 2019. Women with a niche in the uterine cesarean scar, with a residual myometrial thickness of <3 mm and with a desire to become pregnant, were scheduled to undergo a laparoscopic niche resection because of one or more of the following problems (1) postmenstrual spotting; (2) midcycle intrauterine fluid accumulation diagnosed during the fertility workup or (3) difficulties with a previous embryo transfer and preferring a surgical therapy. The study is registered in the ISRCTN register (ref. no. ISRCTN02271575) on April 23, 2013. RESULTS: There were 133 (62%) women included with a desire to become pregnant, 88 with secondary infertility. In all, 83 had an ongoing pregnancy at the 2-year follow-up. The ongoing pregnancy rate in patients with previous fertility problems was 60.2% compared with 66.7% in patients without infertility (odds ratio [OR] 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32-1.7). The OR for live births was 0.57 (95% CI 0.02-1.2). Overall, 8.3% of the pregnancies resulted in miscarriages by the 2-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The reproductive outcomes in women with and without previous fertility problems undergoing resection of a large niche are very promising and quite comparable in both groups. These results suggest, but do not prove, a beneficial effect of this therapy for these indications. The results support the design of future randomized controlled trials to evaluate the effect of niche resection vs expectant management to assess its additional value in women with or without fertility problems who desire pregnancy.

Comparing levonorgestrel intrauterine system with hysteroscopic niche resection in women with postmenstrual spotting related to a niche in the uterine cesarean scar: a randomized, open-label, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Postmenstrual spotting and chronic pelvic pain after cesarean delivery are associated with the presence of niches. Levonorgestrel intrauterine system (52 mg) and hysteroscopic niche resection have been shown to relieve niche-related symptoms at 6 months after the intervention. OBJECTIVE: This trial aimed to compare the effectiveness of 52-mg levonorgestrel intrauterine system with that of hysteroscopic niche resection in reducing niche-related postmenstrual spotting. STUDY DESIGN: This randomized, open-label, controlled trial was conducted at a medical center in Shanghai, China. Women with symptoms of postmenstrual spotting after cesarean delivery, with a niche depth of at least 2 mm and residual myometrium of at least 2.2 mm on magnetic resonance imaging, and no intention to conceive within the next year were randomly assigned to receive treatment with 52-mg levonorgestrel intrauterine system or hysteroscopic niche resection. The primary outcome was the reduction in postmenstrual spotting at 6 months after randomization, defined as the percentage of women with a reduction of at least 50% in spotting days relative to baseline. Efficacy and safety were assessed using intention-to-treat analysis. RESULTS: Between September 2019 and January 2022, 208 women were randomized into the levonorgestrel intrauterine system group (N=104) or the hysteroscopic niche resection group (N=104). At the 6-month follow-up, a 50% reduction in spotting had occurred in 78.4% (80/102) of women in the levonorgestrel intrauterine system group and in 73.1% (76/104) of women in the hysteroscopic niche resection group (relative risk, 1.07 [95% confidence interval, 0.92-1.25]; P=.370). Spotting decreased over time (Ptrend=.001), with a stronger reduction observed in the levonorgestrel intrauterine system group (P=.001). There was also a significant interaction between time and treatment (P=.007). From 9 months onward, a more significant reduction in spotting was observed in the levonorgestrel intrauterine system group than in the hysteroscopic niche resection group (9 months, 89.2% vs 72.1%; relative risk, 1.24 [95% confidence interval, 1.08-1.42]; 12 months, 90.2% vs 70.2%; relative risk, 1.29 [95% confidence interval, 1.12-1.48]). Moreover, compared with the hysteroscopic niche resection group, the levonorgestrel intrauterine system group had significantly fewer postmenstrual spotting days and total bleeding days from 6 months onward (all P<.001), and less pelvic pain from 3 months onward (all P<.010). No intervention-related complications were reported in any group. During follow-up, 11 (10.8%) women reported hormone-related side effects, and 2 women (2.0%) in the levonorgestrel intrauterine system group had spontaneous partial expulsion. Meanwhile, 3 unintended pregnancies were reported in the hysteroscopic niche resection group. CONCLUSION: In women with niche-related postmenstrual spotting, the levonorgestrel intrauterine system was not more effective than hysteroscopic niche resection in reducing the number of spotting days by at least 50% at 6 months. However, the levonorgestrel intrauterine system was superior in reducing spotting from 9 months onward, and it reduced the absolute number of spotting days from 6 months onward and pelvic pain from 3 months onward.

Comparative effectiveness of transvaginal repair vs. hysteroscopic resection in patients with symptomatic uterine niche.

Objective: To compare the efficacy of transvaginal repair and hysteroscopic resection in improving niche associated postmenstrual spotting. Methods: The improvement rate of postmenstrual spotting in women who underwent transvaginal repair or hysteroscopic resection treatment was assessed retrospectively in patients accepted at the Niche Sub-Specialty Clinic in International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital between June 2017 and June 2019. Postoperative spotting symptom within one year after surgery, pre- and postoperative anatomical indicators, women' satisfaction with menstruation and other perioperative parameters were compared between the two groups. Results: 68 patients in the transvaginal group and 70 patients in the hysteroscopic group were included for analysis. The improvement rate of postmenstrual spotting in the transvaginal group at the 3rd, 6th, 9th, and 12th months after surgery was 87%, 88%, 84%, and 85%, significantly higher than 61%, 68%, 66%, and 68% in the hysteroscopic group, respectively (P < 0.05). The total days of spotting improved significantly at the 3rd month after surgery but did not change over time within one year in each group (P > 0.05). After surgery, the disappearance rates of the niche are 68% in transvaginal group and 38% in hysteroscopic group, however, hysteroscopic resection had shorter operative time and hospitalization duration, less complications, and lower hospitalization costs. Conclusion: Both treatments can improve the spotting symptom and anatomical structures of uterine lower segments with niches. Transvaginal repair is better in thickening the residual myometrium than hysteroscopic resection, however, hysteroscopic resection has shorter operative time and hospitalization duration, less complications, and lower hospitalization costs.

Incidence and ultrasonographic characteristics of cesarean scar niches after uterine closure by double-layer barbed suture: A prospective comparative study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the ultrasonographic features of uterine scars and clinical symptoms after cesarean delivery (CD) using barbed and conventional smooth sutures. METHODS: This case-control study enrolled women who underwent primary CD at 37 weeks of pregnancy or later. The uterus was closed using either double-layer unidirectional barbed suture or conventional double-layer smooth suture. Ultrasound scans of the uterine scar and evaluations of menstrual patterns were performed at 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. RESULTS: In all, 102 patients underwent uterine closure with barbed suture, while 135 patients underwent smooth suture. At 6 months, patients in the barbed group had a lower incidence of uterine niches (20.2% vs 32.6%) that were also shallower in depth (P < 0.001). Lower incidence of niches was also observed in the barbed group at 12 and 24 months (P = 0.043 and 0.048, respectively). At these two follow-up times, the smooth group had a higher number of patients reporting postmenstrual spotting (P < 0.05) and more postmenstrual spotting days per month (P < 0.050). CONCLUSION: The use of double-layer barbed suture during CD was associated with a lower incidence of scar niches and a more favorable menstrual pattern compared with the use of smooth suture.

New Efficient Method for Hysteroscopic Isthmoplasty: Four Simple Steps Lead to a Significant Improvement in Bleeding Status.

We demonstrate an effective reduction in postmenstrual spotting after our novel hysteroscopic isthmoplasty. This study included 66 patients with isthmocele-related postmenstrual spotting confirmed by sonography and diagnostic hysteroscopy between 2000 and 2017. Our new interventions included the following four steps: (1) make a resection gradient of the distal edge of the isthmocele from the ape of the isthmocele down to the cervical outer orifice; (2) resect the distal and proximal niches of the isthmocele; (3) electrocauterize the distal and proximal sides (not only the niche bottom) of the small cave on the scar side of the isthmocele; (4) manage the isthmocele until it is largely connected to the cavity. In our results, all patients underwent extensive hysteroscopic repair of newly hysteroscopic isthmoplasty without any intra- or postoperative complications. After final hysteroscopic repair modification, prolonged menstrual spotting was significantly decreased in 98.2% (53/54) of the patients, and the total number of bleeding days per menstrual cycle significantly decreased from a mean of 15.38 ± 3.3 days to 6.4 ± 1.9 days postoperatively (p < 0.001). Our four-step hysteroscopic technique successfully resolved prolonged menstrual spotting in over 90% of the patients, exceeding the resolution rates of 60−85% achieved with other hysteroscopic techniques used to treat symptomatic isthmocele. No patients experience recurrence after long-term follow up. Four simple steps led to a significant improvement in bleeding status.

Improvement of symptoms after hysteroscopic isthmoplasty in women with abnormal uterine bleeding and expected pregnancy: A prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Cesarean scar myometrial defect as known as niche is associated with postmenstrual spotting, suprapubic pain and secondary infertility. Hysteroscopic isthmoplasty has been proposed in the treatment of niche. This study aims to determine the safety and effectiveness of hysteroscopic isthmoplasty in postmenstrual spotting treatment and improvement of spontaneous conceiving. MATERIALS AND METHOD: A prospective study was performed at Hanoi Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Vietnam. We studied women who developed postmenstrual spotting related to niches and had desired to conceive for more than six months. Women with residual myometrium less than 2.5 mm were excluded. Twenty-three eligible women underwent hysteroscopic isthmoplasty with four main steps, including identification of relevant anatomy, resection of the cephalad edge of fibrosis, resection of the caudal edge of fibrosis, and ablation of the niche base. Participants were followed up at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The mean surgical duration was 17 min, and no complications took place. The number of women with improved postmenstrual spotting symptoms after 1, 3, and 6 months were 39.1% (9/23), 61.9% (13/21) and 68.8% (11/16), respectively. Suprapubic pain resolved in 94% (15/16) of the women in the first month. The rate of spontaneous pregnancies within 6 months of isthmoplasty was 30.4% (7/23). There were no differences in depth niche and residual myometrium thickness on ultrasound in the period before and after hysteroscopy. CONCLUSION: Our study supports that hysteroscopic isthmoplasty is a safe and effective procedure for women with a niche and postmenstrual spotting and wish to conceive.

The effect of a hysteroscopic niche resection compared with Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device on postmenstrual spotting in patients with a symptomatic niche in the uterine cesarean scar: A prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of a hysteroscopic niche resection with a Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUD, 52 mg) on postmenstrual spotting duration in patients with a symptomatic niche in the uterine cesarean scar. STUDY DESIGN: This prospective cohort study was conducted at the International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, China. Patients with postmenstrual spotting symptomatic niches were allocated to hysteroscopy group or LNG-IUD group based on the shared medical decision-making approach, and were followed up for 1 year after treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was reduced postmenstrual spotting days at 6th month after treatment. Secondary outcomes were effectiveness rate (proportion of patients with spotting days reduced by at least 50% from baseline), menstrual characteristics, menstruation satisfaction, direct medical costs, complications and side effects. RESULTS: 78 out of the 82 eligible patients were included, 36 patients in both group finished 1-year follow-up. Reduced spotting days at the 6th month was 7 days in LNG-IUD group, significantly higher than 5 days in hysteroscopy group, P = 0.004; The effectiveness rate increased over time within 1 year after the insertion of LNG-IUD (63.89%, 83.33%, 88.89%, 88.89%, P for trend = 0.006), while no trend change was observed in hysteroscopy group (71.05%, 71.05%, 66.67%, 61.11%, P for trend = 0.77). The mean direct medical costs were 817[785,856] $ in the hysteroscopy group and 243[239,255] $ in the LNG-IUD group (p＜0.001). 2 patients removed IUD and 2 patients reported weight gain of more than 5 kg and breast distended pain in LNG-IUD group; 2 patients got pregnant in hysteroscopy group. No serious complications were observed in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: LNG-IUD is more effective in the treatment of postmenstrual spotting from the 6th month onwards than a hysteroscopic niche resection in patients with a symptomatic niche at lower direct costs.

Effect of single- versus double-layer uterine closure during caesarean section on postmenstrual spotting (2Close): multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled superiority trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether double-layer uterine closure after a first caesarean section (CS) is superior compared with single-layer uterine closure in terms of postmenstrual spotting and niche development in the uterine caesarean scar. DESIGN: Multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled superiority trial. SETTING: Thirty-two hospitals in the Netherlands. POPULATION: A total of 2292 women aged ≥18 years undergoing a first CS were randomly assigned to each procedure (1:1): 1144 women were assigned to single-layer uterine closure and 1148 women were assigned to double-layer uterine closure. METHODS: Single-layer unlocked closure and double-layer unlocked closure, with the second layer imbricating the first. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of days with postmenstrual spotting during one menstrual cycle 9 months after CS. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: perioperative and menstrual characteristics; transvaginal ultrasound measurements. RESULTS: A total of 774 (67.7%) women from the single-layer group and 770 (67.1%) women from the double-layer group were evaluable for the primary outcome, as a result of drop-out and amenorrhoea. The mean number of postmenstrual spotting days was 1.33 (bootstrapped 95% CI 1.12-1.54) after single-layer closure and 1.26 (bootstrapped 95% CI 1.07-1.45) after double-layer closure (adjusted mean difference -0.07, 95% CI -0.37 to 0.22, P = 0.810). The operative time was 3.9 minutes longer (95% CI 3.0-4.9 minutes, P < 0.001) and niche prevalence was 4.7% higher (95% CI 0.7-8.7%, P = 0.022) after double-layer closure. CONCLUSIONS: The superiority of double-layer closure compared with single-layer closure in terms of postmenstrual spotting after a first CS was not shown. Long-term obstetric follow-up of our trial is needed to assess whether uterine caesarean closure guidelines should be adapted. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Double-layer uterine closure is not superior for postmenstrual spotting after a first caesarean; single-layer closure performs slightly better on other outcomes.

Association of cesarean scar defect with abnormal uterine bleeding: The results of a prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between cesarean scar defect and abnormal uterine bleeding at one year after cesarean section (CS). STUDY DESIGN: A prospective observational cohort study was conducted in 401 women who delivered by CS between January 2016 and January 2017. Women were screened for isthmocele with sonohysterography six months after CS and followed by electronic questionnaires at 12, 13 and 14 months after CS. The main outcome measure was the prevalence of postmenstrual spotting. Secondary outcome measures were the duration of menstrual bleeding, prevalence of postcoital bleeding, dyspareunia or dysmenorrhea, usage of painkillers, and absence from work or other activities. RESULTS: The response rate was 88 %. In the isthmocele group, the prevalence of postmenstrual spotting was 20.0 % compared to 8.3 % in women without isthmocele (OR 2.75 [95 % CI 1.39-5.44]; P = 0.004). Additionally, women with isthmocele reported more frequently postcoital bleeding (8.3 % vs. 2.4 %; OR 3.73 [95 % CI 1.18-11.83]; P = 0.026). The prevalence of postmenstrual spotting was even higher in the subgroup of large isthmoceles, (25.9 % vs. 9.5 %; (OR 3.34 [95 % CI 1.72-6.49]; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of postmenstrual spotting among isthmocele patients was 20.0 %. Additionally, postmenstrual spotting was associated with the presence of isthmocele inquired at 1 year after CS.

Single- versus double-layer closure of the caesarean (uterine) scar in the prevention of gynaecological symptoms in relation to niche development - the 2Close study: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Double-layer compared to single-layer closure of the uterus after a caesarean section (CS) leads to a thicker myometrial layer at the site of the CS scar, also called residual myometrium thickness (RMT). It possibly decreases the development of a niche, which is an interruption of the myometrium at the site of the uterine scar. Thin RMT and a niche are associated with gynaecological symptoms, obstetric complications in a subsequent pregnancy and delivery and possibly with subfertility. METHODS: Women undergoing a first CS regardless of the gestational age will be asked to participate in this multicentre, double blinded randomised controlled trial (RCT). They will be randomised to single-layer closure or double-layer closure of the uterine incision. Single-layer closure (control group) is performed with a continuous running, unlocked suture, with or without endometrial saving technique. Double-layer closure (intervention group) is performed with the first layer in a continuous unlocked suture including the endometrial layer and the second layer is also continuous unlocked and imbricates the first. The primary outcome is the reported number of days with postmenstrual spotting during one menstrual cycle nine months after CS. Secondary outcomes include surgical data, ultrasound evaluation at three months, menstrual pattern, dysmenorrhea, quality of life, and sexual function at nine months. Structured transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) evaluation is performed to assess the uterine scar and if necessary saline infusion sonohysterography (SIS) or gel instillation sonohysterography (GIS) will be added to the examination. Women and ultrasound examiners will be blinded for allocation. Reproductive outcomes at three years follow-up including fertility, mode of delivery and complications in subsequent deliveries will be studied as well. Analyses will be performed by intention to treat. 2290 women have to be randomised to show a reduction of 15% in the mean number of spotting days. Additionally, a cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed from a societal perspective. DISCUSSION: This RCT will provide insight in the outcomes of single- compared to double-layer closure technique after CS, including postmenstrual spotting and subfertility in relation to niche development measured by ultrasound. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial Register ( NTR5480 ). Registered 29 October 2015.

Hysteroscopic resection of a uterine caesarean scar defect (niche) in women with postmenstrual spotting: a randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of a hysteroscopic niche resection versus no treatment in women with postmenstrual spotting and a uterine caesarean scar defect. DESIGN: Multicentre randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Eleven hospitals collaborating in a consortium for women's health research in the Netherlands. POPULATION: Women reporting postmenstrual spotting after a caesarean section who had a niche with a residual myometrium of ≥3 mm, measured during sonohysterography. METHODS: Women were randomly allocated to hysteroscopic niche resection or expectant management for 6 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the number of days of postmenstrual spotting 6 months after randomisation. Secondary outcomes were spotting at the end of menstruation, intermenstrual spotting, dysuria, sonographic niche measurements, surgical parameters, quality of life, women's satisfaction, sexual function, and additional therapy. Outcomes were measured at 3 months and, except for niche measurements, also at 6 months after randomisation. RESULTS: We randomised 52 women to hysteroscopic niche resection and 51 women to expectant management. The median number of days of postmenstrual spotting at baseline was 8 days in both groups. At 6 months after randomisation, the median number of days of postmenstrual spotting was 4 days (interquartile range, IQR 2-7 days) in the intervention group and 7 days (IQR 3-10 days) in the control group (P = 0.04); on a scale of 0-10, discomfort as a result of spotting had a median score of 2 (IQR 0-7) in the intervention group, compared with 7 (IQR 0-8) in the control group (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In women with a niche with a residual myometrium of ≥3 mm, hysteroscopic niche resection reduced postmenstrual spotting and spotting-related discomfort. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: A hysteroscopic niche resection is an effective treatment to reduce niche-related spotting.

The effect of laparoscopic resection of large niches in the uterine caesarean scar on symptoms, ultrasound findings and quality of life: a prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a laparoscopic niche resection on niche-related symptoms and/or fertility-related problems, ultrasound findings and quality of life. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: University hospital. POPULATION: Women with a large niche (residual myometrium <3 mm) and complaints of either postmenstrual spotting, dysmenorrhoea, intrauterine fluid accumulation and/or difficulties with embryo transfer due to distorted anatomy. METHODS: Women filled out questionnaires and a validated menstrual score chart at baseline and 6 months after the laparoscopic niche resection. At baseline and between 3 and 6 months follow up niches were evaluated by transvaginal ultrasound. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was reduction of the main problem 6 months after the intervention. Secondary outcomes were complications, menstrual characteristics, dysmenorrhoea, niche measurements, intrauterine fluid, surgical outcomes, satisfaction and quality of life. RESULTS: In all, 101 women underwent a laparoscopic niche resection. In 80 women (79.2%) the main problem was improved or resolved. Postmenstrual spotting was significantly reduced by 7 days at 6 months follow up compared with baseline. Dysmenorrhoea and discomfort related to spotting was also significantly reduced. The residual myometrium was increased significantly at follow up. The intrauterine fluid was resolved in 86.9% of the women with intrauterine fluid at baseline; 83.3% of women were (very) satisfied. The physical component of quality of life increased, the mental component did not change. CONCLUSIONS: A laparoscopic niche resection reduced postmenstrual spotting, discomfort due to spotting, dysmenorrhoea and the presence of intrauterine fluid in the majority of women and increased the residual myometrium. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Laparoscopic niche resection reduces niche-related problems and enlarges the residual myometrium.

Technical aspects of the laparoscopic niche resection, a step-by-step tutorial.

The technique of a laparoscopic niche resection is described in ten steps and alternative steps for future studies are discussed.

Importancia ginecológica del istmocele ¿cómo y cuándo tratar? / Gynecological importance of the isthmocele ¿When and how to treat?

Resumen OBJETIVO: determinar la incidencia de defectos en el cierre de la histerorrafia, sus síntomas y analizar las conductas terapéuticas. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: estudio observacional, prospectivo y comparativo de pacientes con defectos en el cierre de la histerorrafia, atendidas en la Clínica de Colposcopia del Centro Estatal de Oncología del Estado de Sonora entre el 1 de enero de 2013 y el 31 de diciembre de 2015. Criterios de inclusión: pacientes con citología anormal y antecedente de cesárea, a quienes se practicaron: colposcopia, endocervicocolposcopia e histeroscopia. Criterios de exclusión: problemas técnicos que impidieron la observación del canal endocervical o la histeroscopia, pacientes posmenopáusicas, y las que tuvieran diagnóstico colposcópico de cáncer invasor. RESULTADOS: se estudiaron 120 pacientes con antecedente de cesárea, que se practicó en diferentes centros hospitalarios, de éstas se excluyeron 25 y quedaron 95 casos: 62 (65%) del grupo A (con defectos en el cierre de la histerorrafia) y 33 (35%) del grupo B (sin defectos en el cierre de la histerorrafia). De los 62 casos con defectos en el cierre de la histerorrafia, 30 (50%) fueron en el cierre de la histerorrafia tipo cúpula, 20 (31%) tipo divertículo y 12 (19%) dehiscencia total. Hubo manchado menstrual en 73% de las pacientes, polimenorrea en 31% y dismenorrea en 33%. Solo 20% de las pacientes sintomáticas refirieron los síntomas como relevantes. El aumento de la vascularidad y el sangrado se encontraron en las pacientes con más síntomas.

Abstract OBJECTIVE: The Cesarean Scar Defect (CSD) has been underestimated in frequency and importance. Is necessary to know its incidence, the symptoms, and analyze new therapeutic procedures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Observational, prospective and comparative study of patients with defects in the closure of hysterorrhaphy, attended at the Colposcopy Clinic of the State Oncology Center of the State of Sonora between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2015. Inclusion criteria: Patients with abnormal cytology and previous cesarean section, who were: colposcopy, endocervicocolposcopy and hysteroscopy. Exclusion criteria: technical problems that prevented observation of the endocervical canal or hysteroscopy, postmenopausal patients, and those with a colposcopic diagnosis of invasive cancer. RESULTS: We found in 65.2%, spotting in a 73.3%, polymenorrhea at 31.3%, and to dysmenorrhea in 32.3%. Only 20% of the symptomatic patients referred the symptom as Relevant. We found "CSDs producers of bleeding" that are related to the patients more systematic. CONCLUSIONS: The cesarean scar defects are frequent cause of gynecological symptomatology that is irrelevant most of the time. A small number of patients needs treatment, we found CSD that produce bleeding, this cases present relevant symptomatology and require treatment. It is necessary to take this into account to choose the best therapeutic approach.

Laparoscopic repair with hysteroscopy of cesarean scar diverticulum.

AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical data of laparoscopic repair with hysteroscopy of cesarean scar diverticulum (CSD). METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 49 patients with CSD in our hospital who had undergone laparoscopic repair with hysteroscopy from January 2014 to June 2015. All patients had a history of cesarean section deliveries and prolonged postmenstrual spotting (duration 16.1 ± 3.4 days). The diagnosis of CSD was established by using 2-D transvaginal ultrasound. RESULTS: All patients underwent the surgical repair successfully, without evident complications. The mean operation time was 90.4 ± 9.1 min, the mean volume of blood loss was 31.2 ± 14.3 mL, and the mean length of hospital stay was 4.1 ± 0.3 days. All patients were followed for 6 months after the operation; the mean duration of menstruation was 7.5 ± 2.5 days shorter on average than the pre-surgical menstrual days, and the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.001). According to the clinical symptoms assessment, 89.8% (44/49) of the surgeries were effective, while according to the anatomic assessment, 95.9% (47/49) were effective. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic repair with hysteroscopy of CSD was confirmed to be a safe, effective, and minimally invasive treatment, and should be widely used to treat patients with CSD.

Prevalence, potential risk factors for development and symptoms related to the presence of uterine niches following Cesarean section: systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To review systematically the medical literature reporting on the prevalence of a niche at the site of a Cesarean section (CS) scar using various diagnostic methods, on potential risk factors for the development of a niche and on niche-related gynecological symptoms in non-pregnant women. METHODS: The PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched. All types of clinical study reporting on the prevalence, risk factors and/or symptoms of a niche in non-pregnant women with a history of CS were included, apart from case reports and case series. RESULTS: Twenty-one papers were selected for inclusion in the review. A wide range in the prevalence of a niche was found. Using contrast-enhanced sonohysterography in a random population of women with a history of CS, the prevalence was found to vary between 56% and 84%. Nine studies reported on risk factors and each study evaluated different factors, which made it difficult to compare studies. Risk factors could be classified into four categories: those related to closure technique, to development of the lower uterine segment or location of the incision or to wound healing, and miscellaneous factors. Probable risk factors are single-layer myometrium closure, multiple CSs and uterine retroflexion. Six out of eight studies that evaluated niche-related symptoms described an association between the presence of a niche and postmenstrual spotting. CONCLUSIONS: The reported prevalence of a niche in non-pregnant women varies depending on the method of detection, the criteria used to define a niche and the study population. Potential risk factors can be categorized into four main categories, which may be useful for future research and meta-analyses. The predominant symptom associated with a niche is postmenstrual spotting.

Minimally invasive therapy for gynaecological symptoms related to a niche in the caesarean scar: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Various therapies are currently used to treat symptoms related to the niche (an anechoic area) in the caesarean scar, in particular to treat abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB). OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the available literature reporting on the effect of various therapies on niche-related symptoms. SEARCH STRATEGY: A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, trial registers and congress abstracts from AAGL and ESGE was performed. SELECTION CRITERIA: Articles reporting on the effectiveness of therapies other than hysterectomy in women with niche-related symptoms were included. Studies were included if they reported one of the following outcomes: effect on AUB, pain relief, sexual function, quality of life (QOL), and surgical, anatomic, fertility, or pregnancy outcome. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently selected the articles to be included. The Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines were followed. A standardised checklist was used to score the methodological quality of the included studies. MAIN RESULTS: Twelve studies were included, reporting on hysteroscopic niche resection (eight studies, 384 patients), laparoscopic repair (one study, 13 patients), (laparoscopic assisted) vaginal repair (two studies, 47 patients), and oral contraceptives (OCs) (one study, 11 patients). Reported AUB improved in the vast majority of the patients after these interventions, ranging from 87 to 100%. The rate of complications was low. Pregnancies were reported after therapy; however, sample sizes and follow-up were insufficient to study fertility or pregnancy outcome. The methodological quality of the selected papers was considered to be moderate to poor, and was therefore insufficient to make solid conclusions. AUTHOR'S CONCLUSIONS: More evidence is needed before (surgical) niche interventions are implemented in daily practice.

Long-term complications of caesarean section. The niche in the scar: a prospective cohort study on niche prevalence and its relation to abnormal uterine bleeding.

OBJECTIVE: To study the prevalence of niches in the caesarean scar in a random population, and the relationship with postmenstrual spotting and urinary incontinence. DESIGN: A prospective cohort study. SETTING: A teaching hospital in the Netherlands. POPULATION: Non-pregnant women delivered by caesarean section. METHODS: Transvaginal ultrasound (TVU) and gel instillation sonohysterography (GIS) were performed 6-12 weeks after caesarean section. Women were followed by questionnaire and menstruation score chart at 6-12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months after caesarean section. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of a niche 6-12 weeks after caesarean section, using TVU and GIS. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: relation to postmenstrual spotting and urinary incontinence 6 and 12 months after caesarean section; and niche characteristics, evaluated by TVU and GIS. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-three women were included. Niche prevalence was 49.6% on evaluation with TVU and 64.5% with GIS. Women with a niche measured by GIS reported more postmenstrual spotting than women without a niche (OR 5.48, 95% CI 1.14-26.48). Women with residual myometrium at the site of the uterine scar measuring <50% of the adjacent myometrial thickness had postmenstrual spotting more often than women with a residual myometrial thickness of >50% of the adjacent myometrial thickness (OR 6.13, 95% CI 1.74-21.63). Urinary incontinence was not related to the presence of a niche. CONCLUSIONS: A niche is present in 64.5% of women 6-12 weeks after caesarean section, when examined by GIS. Postmenstrual spotting is more prevalent in women with a niche and in women with a residual myometrial thickness of <50% of the adjacent myometrium.

Cesarean scar defects: an underrecognized cause of abnormal uterine bleeding and other gynecologic complications.

The gynecologic sequelae due to deficient uterine scar healing after cesarean section are only recently being identified and described. These include conditions such as abnormal bleeding, pelvic pain, infertility, and cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy, as well as a potentially higher risk of complications and difficulties during gynecologic procedures such as uterine evacuation, hysterectomy, endometrial ablation, and insertion of an intrauterine device. The proposed mechanism of abnormal uterine bleeding is a pouch or "isthmocele" in the lower uterine segment that causes delayed menstrual bleeding. The prevalence of symptomatic or clinically relevant cesarean scar defects (CSDs) ranges from 19.4% to 88%. Possible risk factors for CSD include number of cesarean sections, uterine position, labor before cesarean section, and surgical technique used to close the uterine incision. There are no accepted guidelines for the diagnostic criteria of CSD. We propose that a CSD be defined on transvaginal ultrasound or saline infusion sonohysterography as a triangular hypoechoic defect in the myometrium at the site of the previous hysterotomy. We also propose a classification system to aid in standardized classification for future research. Surgical techniques for repair of CSD include laparoscopic excision, resectoscopic treatment, vaginal revision, and endometrial ablation.