RESUMO
Objective: Chronic postoperative pain (CPSP) is common after thoracic surgery, even after the less invasive video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). This study investigated the effect of thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) on the development of CPSP. Materials: We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients who underwent VATS at our center between 2020 and 2022. The enrolled patients were divided into the epidural block (EPI) and patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) groups. A telephone questionnaire was used to collect information regarding CPSP, which was defined as a numerical rating scale (VAS) score ≥1 at 3 or 6 months postoperatively. Additionally, statistical analyses were performed to identify the risk factors for CPSP in the two groups. Results: Overall, 894 patients completed the follow-up interviews at 3 and 6 months, with 325 and 569 patients in the PCIA and EPI groups, respectively. The incidence rates of CPSP in the PCIA group at 3 and 6 months were 16.9 % (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 9.3-32.7 %) and 13.5 % (95 % CI: 8.7-33.4 %), and 10.3 % (95 % CI: 8.1-30.5 %) and 3.6 % (95 % CI: 3.5-21.5 %) in EPI group, respectively. The incidence of CPSP at 3 months (P = 0.0048) and 6 months (P < 0.005) was statistically significant in both groups. Age and lymph node dissection were significantly associated with CPSP. Conclusions: Compared to PCIA, TEA was associated with a lower incidence of CPSP after VATS, and should be considered an important part of the analgesia regimen for patients with VATS.
RESUMO
Background: Contemporarily, transabdominal preperitoneal repair (TAPP) procedure in inguinal hernia treatment is counted among the routine minimal invasive general surgery practices. Increased patient's comfort, namely less postoperative pain, is considered to be its greatest advantage. However, pain following surgery can still be an important problem. Port site local anesthetic injection (PSLAI), iliohypogastric-/ilioinguinal nerve block (IINB), and preperitoneal local anesthetic spraying (PLAS) are relatively new techniques with sparse data to address this issue. Therefore, we conducted this prospective study to evaluate these three methods in patients who underwent TAPP for inguinal hernia repair. Methods: A total of 99 patients were enrolled and randomized equally into three groups. Every patient received a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device. PCA usage, total analgesic demands, and numerical rating scale values were recorded at 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively (p.o). Results: Patients' demographic data (age, gender, BMI) did not reveal any significant difference between groups (P > .05). Procedure duration was found to be significantly longer in IINB group compared with others (p < .05). Number of PCA usages, total analgesic demand, additional analgesic requirement did not differ significantly between groups at 24-hour p.o (P > .05). PLAS group was found to have less average NSR score compared with other groups at 24 hours p.o (p < .05). Conclusions: All three procedures show promising outcomes with PLAS technique appearing to be slightly superior in terms of pain management in the immediate postoperative period. However, to reach a conclusion more randomized controlled trials covering various aspects and techniques of minimal invasive approach to inguinal hernia repair should be published.
RESUMO
Objective: Postoperative pain is a common complication in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) patients. This study aimed to develop and validate predictive models for postoperative pain associated ESD. Methods: We retrospectively constructed a development cohort comprising 2162 patients who underwent ESD at our hospital between January 2015 and April 2022. The dataset was randomly divided into a training set (n = 1541) and a validation set (n = 621) in a 7:3 ratio. The bidirectional stepwise regression with Akaike's information criterion (AIC) and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to screen the predictors of post-ESD pain and construct three nomograms. We evaluated the model's discrimination, precision and clinical benefit through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration plots, Hosmer-Lemeshow (HL) goodness-of-fit test and decision curve analysis (DCA) in internal validation. Results: The proportion of patients developing postoperative pain in the training and testing data set was 25.6% and 28.5%, respectively. Three nomograms were constructed according to the final logistic regression models. The clinical prediction models for preoperative risks, preoperative and intraoperative risks, and perioperative risks consisted of seven, nine and six independent predictors, respectively, after bidirectional stepwise elimination. The models demonstrated the AUC of 0.794 (95% CI 0.768-0.820), 0.823 (95% CI 0.799-0.847) and 0.817 (95% CI 0.792-0.842) in the training cohort and 0.702 (95% CI 0.655-0.748), 0.705 (95% CI 0.659-0.752) and 0.747 (95% CI 0.703-0.790) in the validation cohort. The calibration plot, HL and DCA demonstrated the model's favorable clinical applicability. Conclusion: We developed and validated three robust nomogram models, which might identify patients at risk of post-ESD pain and promising for clinical applications.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study analyzed, using an umbrella review, existing systematic reviews on medications to prevent and control postoperative endodontic pain to guide professionals in choosing the most effective drug. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic search in the PubMed (MEDLINE), LILACS, SciELO, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Reviews, and Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) databases retrieved 17 systematic reviews. The study included only systematic reviews of clinical trials with or without meta-analyses evaluating effectiveness of medications in reducing pain after non-surgical endodontic treatment. RESULTS: The evidence showed that steroidal and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids effectively controlled pain within six to 24 h. CONCLUSIONS: Dexamethasone, prednisolone, paracetamol, and mainly ibuprofen provided higher postoperative pain relief. The quality of evidence of the reviews ranged from very low to high, and the risk of bias from low to high, suggesting the need for well-designed clinical trials to provide confirmatory evidence. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This review emphasizes the efficacy of developing protocols for pain control after endodontic therapy.
Assuntos
Dor Pós-Operatória , Tratamento do Canal Radicular , Humanos , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Tratamento do Canal Radicular/métodos , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Medição da Dor , Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Preoperative anxiety is a common preoperative psychological state in patients with cancer and associated with worsening perioperative outcomes. However, high-quality prospective studies on preoperative anxiety in patients undergoing lung surgery are scarce. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study, enrolling a total of 540 patients. Preoperative anxiety in patients undergoing thoracic surgery was measured using the Hospitalization Anxiety Scale. Patients were grouped according to the Hospitalization Anxiety Scale scores as follows: no anxiety (score <8) and anxiety (score ≥8). The association of preoperative anxiety with postoperative complications and non-complicated adverse events was determined by univariate regression and polynomial regression analyses. RESULTS: A total of 121 patients (22.4 %) experienced preoperative anxiety. The anxiety group had a longer average hospital stay (4.33 vs. 3.85 days). Postoperative complications were similar between groups, but the anxiety group reported worse sleep quality (measured by the Athens Insomnia Scale). Regarding postoperative pain, both groups had comparable rates of mild and severe pain on postoperative day 1. However, the anxiety group experienced significantly higher rates of severe pain on postoperative day 2 and mild pain on postoperative day 3. Additionally, the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was significantly higher in the anxiety group on postoperative day 1. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative anxiety may not increase the rates of postoperative complications in patients undergoing lung surgery. However, it may be associated with postoperative sleep disturbances, pain, nausea, and vomiting, as well as prolong the length of postoperative hospitalization.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Adductor canal block and periarticular infiltration analgesia (PIA) have been shown to relieve pain in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) effectively. However, their analgesic effectiveness has some limitations. Thus, we considered a novel blocking site that could achieve analgesia without affecting the muscle strength of the lower limbs. METHODS: Seventy-two patients undergoing primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty were randomized into two groups. One group was treated with adductor canal and popliteal plexus (APB) combined with interspace between the popliteal artery and posterior capsule of the knee (iPACK) and local infiltration anesthesia (LIA) and the other was treated with PIA. The primary outcomes included postoperative pain, as assessed by the visual analog scale (VAS), and the consumption of oral tramadol. Secondary outcomes included functional recovery and daily ambulation distance. Tertiary outcomes included postoperative adverse effects. RESULTS: The APB group had lower VAS scores after surgery at rest and during motion. Compared with the PIA group, the walking distance of the APB group on the second day was greater. The muscle strength of the APB group was lower than that of the PIA group at the early stage. Patients in the APB group also consumed less tramadol than those in the PIA group. There was no difference in the incidence of adverse events between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: APB combined with iPACK and LIA is a novel block for TKA, and it can reduce postoperative pain sooner after TKA without affecting postoperative functional recovery or increasing complications.
RESUMO
Background A common knee joint disorder is injury to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), which often requires surgery. Proper pain control after the surgery facilitates fast recovery and prevents chronic pain. To provide analgesia for knee procedures, the use of opioids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications, and regional techniques are commonly employed. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of adductor canal block (ACB) and femoral nerve block (FNB) for postoperative pain management after anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions (ACLRs). Methodology This prospective interventional study included 30 participants scheduled for patellar graft ACLR. They were assigned into groups, i.e., ACB and FNB, with 15 patients each. The evaluation occurred one day before the operation, and all surgical procedures were performed using spinal anesthesia. During the postoperative period, a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS) was utilized to quantify pain intensity at the end of the surgery and at various intervals after the surgery. Patients with a VAS score greater than 4 received either FNB or ACB using bupivacaine 0.125%. Duration of analgesia time, power of quadriceps muscle, and neurologic complications were documented. Results No statistically significant value was observed in the mean duration of analgesia between the patients in ACB (348.33 minutes) and the patients in FNB (363.06 minutes). No motor block was observed in 12 patients who received ACB, while only four patients had a motor-sparing effect among those who received FNB. No neurological adverse effects were observed in the study participants. Conclusions ACB provides an equal duration of analgesia similar to FNB, and ACB significantly spares motor strength and maintains higher quadriceps power than FNB.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To identify risk factors associated with increased postoperative opioid consumption and inferior pain outcomes following knee and shoulder arthroscopy. METHODS: Using the data set from the NonOpioid Prescriptions after Arthroscopic Surgery in Canada (NO PAin) trial, eight prognostic factors were chosen a priori to evaluate their effect on opioid consumption and patient-reported pain following arthroscopic knee and shoulder surgery. The primary outcome was the number of oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) consumed at 2 and 6 weeks postoperatively. The secondary outcome was patient-reported postoperative pain using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 2 and 6 weeks postoperatively. A multivariable linear regression was used to analyse these outcomes with eight prognostic factors as independent variables. RESULTS: Tobacco usage was significantly associated with higher opioid usage at 2 (p < 0.001) and 6 weeks (p = 0.02) postoperatively. Former tobacco users had a higher 2-week (p = 0.002) and cumulative OME (p = 0.002) consumption compared to current and nonsmokers. Patients with a higher number of comorbidities (p = 0.006) and those who were employed (p = 0.006) reported higher pain scores at 6 weeks. Patients in the 'not employed/other' category had significantly lower pain scores at 6 weeks postoperatively (p = 0.046). CONCLUSION: Former smoking status was significantly associated with increased post-operative opioid consumption following knee and shoulder arthroscopy at 2 and 6 weeks postoperatively. Increased pain was found to be significantly associated with employment status and an increasing number of comorbidities at 6 weeks postoperatively. These findings can aid clinicians in identifying and mitigating increased opioid utilization as well as worse pain outcomes in high-risk patient populations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, cohort study.
RESUMO
Objective: To determine the efficacy and safety of rectal diclofenac for relieving postoperative pain following diagnostic hystero-laparoscopy and dye test (dHLD). Methods: A prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial was conducted among women who underwent dHLD to evaluate fertility. The women received either rectal diclofenac with intramuscular pentazocine or intramuscular pentazocine with rectal placebo for postoperative analgesia. The median pain scores at different time points were assessed as the primary outcome measures using the Numerical Rating Scale for pain. The secondary outcome measures were analgesic consumption, time at which first analgesic was requested, satisfaction with pain relief and any adverse events. Results: In total, 108 participants were analysed (54 in each group, 1:1 ratio). The median score for postoperative pain was lower for the diclofenac group compared with the placebo group at 4 h (52.53 vs 56.47; p = 0.507), 6 h (50.48 vs 58.52; p = 0.174), 8 h (51.42 vs 57.65; p = 0.296), 10 h (51.35 vs 57.65; p = 0.285) and 12 h (52.45 vs 56.55; p = 0.485) post surgery, although the difference was not significant (p > 0.05). Seventeen participants required rescue analgesia with 30 mg of pentazocine: 11 at 4 h post surgery [5 (62.5 %) vs 6 (66.7 %)], three at 6 h post surgery [2 (25.0 %) vs 1 (11.1 %)], two at 8 h post surgery [1 (12.5 %) vs 1 (11.1 %)], and one at 12 h post surgery [0 vs 1 (11.1 %)] for the diclofenac and placebo groups respectively (p = 0.713). There were no significant differences in postoperative adverse effect profiles, overall patient satisfaction, and need for rescue analgesia between the two groups (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Postoperative use of rectal diclofenac and pentazocine is safe, but did not significantly improve pain scores, patient satisfaction and need for rescue analgesia following dHLD, compared with patients who received pentazocine and placebo. While a multi-modal approach to pain relief following dHLD does not appear to be significantly beneficial, a multi-centre study is needed to confirm or refute these findings.
RESUMO
AIM: This study aimed to compare the outcomes of modified radical mastectomy (MRM) with the use of a harmonic scalpel versus electrocautery in patients with breast carcinoma. METHODOLOGY: A prospective, non-randomized comparative study conducted from August 2022 to June 2024 on 40 female patients with stage II breast carcinoma undergoing MRM with electrocautery and harmonic scalpel. RESULTS: Patients with MRM by harmonic scalpel exhibited significantly lower intraoperative blood loss (92.50 ± 9.67 mL) than by electrocautery (172.50 ± 30.76 mL) (p-value <.0001). The average operative time was significantly shorter for the harmonic scalpel (111.00 ± 10.71 minutes) than for the electrocautery (169.50 ± 19.32 minutes) (p-value <.0001). Postoperative pain was lower for the harmonic scalpel (visual analog scale (VAS) score 3.75 ± 0.79) than for the electrocautery (VAS score 6.10 ± 0.85) (p-value <.0001). The incidence of flap necrosis was not substantially different between the categories; seroma formation was significantly lower with the use of a harmonic scalpel (p-value <.0001). Subjects in the group of harmonic scalpels also had shorter hospital stays (8.35 ± 0.93 days) compared with the electrocautery group (12.20 ± 1.06 days) (p-value <.0001).
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Treatment with opioids is a mainstay in perioperative pain management. While the leading treatment paradigm has been procedure-specific pain management, efforts regarding personalized pain treatment are increasing. The OPIâ¢AID project aims to develop personalized algorithms for perioperative pain management, taking demographic, surgical, and anaesthesiologic factors into account. We will undertake five parallel reviews to illuminate current evidence on different aspects of individual responses to perioperative opioid treatment. METHODS: Inclusion of adult populations in English-written studies. Review-specific searches are developed for the following databases: CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, clinicaltrials.gov, and clinicaltrial.eu. Two authors will independently screen citations, extract data, and assess the risks of bias in each review (QUIPS, PROBAST and RoB2, as relevant). CONCLUSION: These reviews will evaluate various aspects of perioperative opioid treatment, including individualized treatment strategies, selection of specific opioids, and individual patient responses. These will guide future development of a personalized perioperative opioid treatment algorithm (OPIâ¢AID) that will be validated and tested clinically against standard of care.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the incidence and intensity of postoperative pain in oncological patients with infected teeth subjected to nonsurgical root canal treatment or retreatment. METHODS: Teeth with apical periodontitis from healthy control patients and oncological patients (n = 70 per group) were root canal treated/retreated and evaluated for the development of postoperative pain. Patients from the two groups were matched for tooth type, gender, clinical manifestation of apical periodontitis, and intervention type. A visual analogue scale (VSA) was used to evaluate the incidence of postoperative pain at 24 h, 72 h, 7d, and 15d after chemomechanical procedures. Data were statistically analyzed for the incidence and intensity of postoperative pain in the two groups. RESULTS: Preoperative pain occurred in 10% of the individuals and in all these cases pain showed a reduction in intensity or was absent after endodontic intervention at 24-h evaluation. The overall incidence of postoperative pain at 24 h was 14% in oncology patients and 30% in controls (p = 0.03). At 72 h, the respective corresponding figures were 4% and 8.5% (p > 0.05). At 7 and 15 days, all patients were asymptomatic, irrespective of the group. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences in postoperative pain were found between control and oncological patients. The low incidence of postoperative pain observed in both groups supports the routine use of nonsurgical root canal treatment/retreatment as valid options in oncological patients. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Oncological patients had no increased risk of postoperative pain in comparison with control patients.
Assuntos
Medição da Dor , Dor Pós-Operatória , Periodontite Periapical , Tratamento do Canal Radicular , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Feminino , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Masculino , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Periodontite Periapical/terapia , Periodontite Periapical/cirurgia , Incidência , Adulto , Idoso , Neoplasias/complicações , RetratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Vital pulp therapy maintained functionality, vitality, and asymptomatic teeth. Compared to normal root canal treatment, pulpotomy was more helpful for irreversible pulpitis in adult permanent teeth. The research was aimed to assess effectiveness of vital pulp therapy using mineral trioxide aggregate with Apple Vinegar and Ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid (17%) for five minutes in adult carious exposed pulp of permanent teeth. METHODS: Forty patients between 18 and 50 years old with a clinical diagnosis of symptomatic irreversible pulpitis but no periapical radiolucency were then divided randomly into two groups based on the irrigation method; ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid or apple vinegar. If pulpal bleeding could not be managed in less than six minutes, the assigned procedure was abandoned. After mineral trioxide aggregate application as a pulpotomy agent, glass ionomer and composite restoration were placed. Using a visual analogue scale, the pre and post-operative pain were recorded after 2,6,24,48, and 72 h. Success was assessed using radiographic and clinical examination data at three, six, and twelve months. RESULTS: The success rate was discovered to be non-statistically significant in both groups after a year follow-up. Apple vinegar had a lower mean value than ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid at the preoperative baseline pain level, which was significant.Postoperatively, the ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid group reported the greatest mean value after two hours while Apple vinegar group reported the lowest mean values after 48 h (P < 0.05). After 72 h, pain level recorded insignificant difference. CONCLUSION: Apple vinegar yielded a marginally successful outcome but substantially improved pain alleviation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered in Clinical trials.gov with this identifier NCT05970536 on 23/7/2023.
Assuntos
Compostos de Alumínio , Compostos de Cálcio , Quelantes , Combinação de Medicamentos , Óxidos , Pulpite , Silicatos , Humanos , Adulto , Pulpite/terapia , Feminino , Masculino , Silicatos/uso terapêutico , Compostos de Cálcio/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Compostos de Alumínio/uso terapêutico , Quelantes/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Óxidos/uso terapêutico , Ácido Edético/uso terapêutico , Ácido Acético/uso terapêutico , Pulpotomia/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Cerâmica , Medição da DorRESUMO
Background/Objective: Wound infiltration with local anesthetics emerges as a promising modality for postoperative pain alleviation. However, such strategies in neck surgery have not been a well-established practice. To assess wound infiltration with ropivacaine plus magnesium sulfate for pain relief following thyroid surgery. Methods: This prospective, double-blind, randomized study enrolled 68 patients who underwent thyroid surgery. Concerning the solution used for surgical wound infiltration, the study participants were randomly allocated into three groups: (1) 100 mg of ropivacaine (Group R); (2) 100 mg of ropivacaine plus magnesium sulfate 10 mg/kg (Group RMg); and (3) normal saline which served as a placebo (Group P). Pain perception both at rest and at movement, was measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 30 min, as well as at 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively. The total consumption of analgesics in morphine equivalents was also recorded. Moreover, adverse effects and patient satisfaction were recorded. Cortisol, TNF-α, and IL-6 levels were measured 30 min before infiltration and 6 h and 24 h postoperatively. Results: Demographics and clinical characteristics were similar between the groups. The VAS scores at rest and during movement were significantly lower in the RMg group compared to the saline or ropivacaine groups. Total analgesic consumption was also significantly lower in the RMg group. No operation-, wound-, or infiltration-related adverse effects were recorded in the study groups. Better overall satisfaction was obtained for the RMg group. Conclusions: Ropivacaine plus magnesium sulfate wound infiltration provided better pain control and the analgesic effect was more significant, contributing to effective postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing thyroid surgery.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the effects of preoperative listening to patient-preferred music and classical music on postoperative anxiety and recovery. METHODS: A prospective, randomized controlled, single-blind study included 255 patients who were scheduled for elective inguinal hernia operation under general anesthesia. Spielberger state State-Trait Anxiety Inventory form 1,2 (STAI-I, STAI-II), Quality of Recovery Score-40 (QoR-40) were applied in the preoperatively. In the preoperative period, the preferential music group (group P) patients listened to their favorite music, while patients in the classical music group (group C) listened to classical music, music was not played in the control group (group N). STAI-I, QoR-40 questionnaire, pain status, and patient satisfaction in the postoperative period were recorded by a blinded investigator. RESULTS: A total of 217 patients participated in the study analysis. Postoperative STAI-1 score was lower in group P than in group N (p = 0.025) and was similar among other groups. The postoperative QoR-40 score was significantly higher in group P than in group N (p = 0.003), and it was similar between the other groups. While SBP, DBP and HR premusic and post-music changes were significant, there was no difference in other groups. There was no difference between the groups in the NRS score. The patient satisfaction score was significantly higher in group P. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative patient-preferred music application reduces postoperative anxiety and improves recovery quality compared to classical music. In addition, regulation of hemodynamic data and patient satisfaction increase in a preferential music application, but pain scores do not change. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04277559| https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/.
RESUMO
Background and Aims: Postoperative pain can impede functional recovery and delay hospital discharge after functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). The study aimed to assess the efficacy of ultrasound (USG)-guided suprazygomatic maxillary nerve block (SZMNB) for postoperative pain in FESS. Methods: Forty-eight adult patients between 18 and 65 years of age with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II and scheduled to undergo FESS were enroled in this randomised controlled study. Patients were randomly allocated to either receive USG-guided SZMNB with general anaesthesia (n = 24) or general anaesthesia alone (n = 24). The numerical rating scale (NRS) pain score in the immediate postoperative period was recorded as the primary outcome. A total of 24 h postoperative rescue analgesic consumption, surgeon satisfaction score, postoperative haemodynamics, and postoperative complications were noted as secondary outcomes. Results: The median (interquartile range) of the NRS pain score in the immediate postoperative period was 0 (0-0.25)[95% confidence interval (CI): 0, 0.08] in the block group compared to 2 (1.75-3) [95% CI: 1.60, 2.40] in the control group, P < 0.001]. Pain scores were significantly reduced at all time intervals till 24 h after surgery (P < 0.001). None of the patients required rescue analgesia in the block group. In contrast, eight patients required diclofenac 75 mg intravenous as rescue analgesia within 1 h of surgery and ten patients within 1-6 h of surgery in the control group. Other secondary outcomes were comparable between groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: The USG-guided SZMNB provides excellent postoperative analgesia for patients undergoing FESS without significant side effects.
RESUMO
Local anesthetics (LA), as part of multimodal analgesia, have garnered significant interest for their role in delaying the initiation of opioid therapy, reducing postoperative opioid usage, and mitigating both hospitalization duration and related expenses. Despite numerous endeavors to extend the duration of local anesthetic effects, achieving truly satisfactory long-acting analgesia remains elusive. Drawing upon prior investigations, vesicular phospholipid gels (VPGs) emerge as promising candidates for extended-release modalities in small-molecule drug delivery systems. Therefore, we tried to use the amphiphilicity of phospholipids to co-encapsulate levobupivacaine hydrochloride and meloxicam, two drugs with different hydrophilicity, to obtain a long-term synergistic analgesic effect. Initially, the physicochemical attributes of the formulation were characterized, followed by an examination of its in vitro release kinetics, substantiating the viability of extending the release duration of the dual drugs. Sequentially, in vivo investigations encompassing pharmacokinetic profiling and assessment of analgesic efficacy were undertaken, revealing a prolonged release duration of up to 120 h and attainment of optimal postoperative analgesia. Subsequently, inquiries into the mechanism underlying synergistic analgesic effects and safety evaluations pertinent to the delivery strategy were pursued. In summation, we successfully developed a promising formulation to achieve long-acting analgesia.
RESUMO
Background: Surgical pain affects postoperative sleep quality, and they jointly form a vicious cycle of mutual influence. The cycle of postoperative pain and sleep disorders could lead to delirium, cardiovascular disease, and hyperalgesia, which significantly affect patients' postoperative recovery. Thus, exploring this phenomenon is of great importance for surgical patients, and warrants further investigation. Objective: By employing bibliometric methods, this study systematically analyzes the publications on postoperative pain-sleep disorders, identifies research trends and field dynamics, and ultimately provides insights for further progress in this research area. Methods: In this study, we searched the Web of Science database for studies on postoperative pain and sleep disorders from 2013 to 2023, and analyzed the number of publications, journals, authors, institutions, country regions, and keywords by utilizing CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and Bibliometrix. Results: The 1894 retrieved publications showed a trend of increasing number of publications and correlations between postoperative pain and sleep disorders from 2013 to 2023. The top countries for publications included the USA, China, etc., establishing a global collaborative network centered around the USA, China, and Europe. The top institutions for publications included University of California System, Harvard University, etc. The top authors include Christine Miaskowski, Steven M. Paul, Qiuling Shi, etc. These publications involved multiple disciplines including surgery, neurology, and anesthesiology, and various research funds including NIH, HHS, NSFC, etc. The top journals for publications included the European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, etc. Keywords that appear most frequently in this field include "pain", "surgery", "quality of life", "sleep", "depression", and "outcomes". The thematic map indicated that the hot topics in this area include obstructive sleep apnea, tonsillectomy, children, pain, quality of life, and sleep. The undeveloped topics with research potential included postoperative pain, analgesia and dexmedetomidine, breast cancer, fatigue, and lung cancer. Conclusion: The increased number of publications and correlations between postoperative pain and sleep disorders, and the collaborative network across the USA, China, and Europe indicate a growing global interest in this area. This study also provides valuable insights into the trend of hot topics and frontiers and shows that this is an evolving and dynamic research area.
RESUMO
One and a half million cardiac surgeries are completed worldwide each year where undertreated postoperative pain increases the risk of patient morbidity and mortality. Patient-centered pain management is recommended to improve patient outcomes but there is insufficient information regarding how the patient views their role. The objective of this study is to explore cardiac surgery patients' perspectives on their role in postoperative pain management. This study used an interpretive phenomenological design and convenience sampling. Six participants who had undergone cardiac surgery were recruited from a cardiac rehabilitation program in Western Canada. The first author conducted semi-structured digitally recorded interviews. Sociodemographic characteristics and measures of anxiety and depression were also collected. Emergent thematic analysis of the qualitative data generated three themes: attitude, coping and care, and communication. The findings of this study address a gap in the literature with regard to patients' perceived roles in pain management. There is a complex relationship between patient attitude, coping and care, and communication which, in turn, influences how patients view their role within the pain management continuum. These themes contribute to the development of the patient role within the pain management continuum and form an integrated feedback loop. The patient's attitude contributes to their ability to cope with pain and participate in pain assessment and management. Furthermore, their ability to cope and desire to participate influences the development of their attitude. These findings may enhance providers' understanding of the patient's perspective and improve pain management outcomes.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Concerns around delayed emergence and opioid-induced ventilatory impairment in bariatric surgery can lead to intraoperative reliance on short-acting opioids and avoidance of long-acting analgesics with potential sedative effects. Nevertheless, an overly-conservative intraoperative analgesic strategy may result in significant pain at emergence and higher opioid requirements in later phases of care. We sought to establish the pattern of intraoperative analgesic use in bariatric surgical patients as well as their postoperative pain trajectory and opioid requirements. METHODS: We undertook a single-centre historical cohort study. We explored associations between intraoperative analgesic interventions and pain scores and opioid requirements in postanesthesia care units (PACUs), and associations between the quality of analgesia at emergence and subsequent pain and patient-centred recovery outcomes. RESULTS: We extracted perioperative data for 939 patients who underwent bariatric metabolic surgery between January 2018 and October 2019. Only 39% of patients received long-acting opioids intraoperatively and there was minimal use of nonopioid analgesic adjuncts. Nearly 80% of patients reported moderate-to-severe pain on PACU arrival; 97% of patients received intravenous opioids for rescue analgesia (mean dose, 31 mg oral morphine equivalents). Lower pain scores at PACU admission and discharge were associated with subsequent lower inpatient pain scores, lower opioid requirements, shorter time to ambulation, and shorter length of hospital stay. CONCLUSION: In bariatric surgical patients, effective intraoperative analgesic strategies that improve early pain control may have an impact on recovery and pain experience. Judicious use of intraoperative opioids coupled with opioid-sparing multimodal analgesic techniques should be considered and balanced against concerns regarding opioid-related adverse effects in this patient population.
RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Les préoccupations concernant l'émergence retardée et l'insuffisance ventilatoire induite par les opioïdes en chirurgie bariatrique peuvent conduire à une dépendance peropératoire aux opioïdes à courte durée d'action et à l'évitement des analgésiques à action prolongée ayant des effets sédatifs potentiels. Néanmoins, une stratégie analgésique peropératoire trop conservatrice peut entraîner une douleur importante à l'émergence et des besoins en opioïdes plus élevés dans les phases ultérieures des soins. Nous avons cherché à établir le profil d'utilisation des analgésiques peropératoires chez les patient·es en chirurgie bariatrique ainsi que leur trajectoire de douleur postopératoire et leurs besoins en opioïdes. MéTHODE: Nous avons mené une étude de cohorte historique monocentrique. Nous avons exploré les associations entre les interventions analgésiques peropératoires et les scores de douleur et les besoins en opioïdes dans les salles de réveil, ainsi que les associations entre la qualité de l'analgésie à l'émergence et la douleur ultérieure et les résultats de récupération centrés sur les patient·es. RéSULTATS: Nous avons extrait les données périopératoires de 939 patient·es ayant bénéficié d'une chirurgie métabolique bariatrique entre janvier 2018 et octobre 2019. Seulement 39 % des patient·es ont reçu des opioïdes à action prolongée en peropératoire et l'utilisation d'analgésiques auxiliaires non opioïdes a été minimale. Près de 80 % des patient·es ont signalé une douleur modérée à sévère à leur arrivée en salle de réveil; 97 % des patient·es ont reçu des opioïdes par voie intraveineuse pour une analgésie de secours (dose moyenne, équivalents de morphine orale de 31 mg). Des scores de douleur plus faibles à l'admission et à la sortie de la salle de réveil ont été associés à des scores de douleur plus faibles en milieu hospitalier, à des besoins en opioïdes plus faibles, à un délai avant l'ambulation plus court et à une durée d'hospitalisation plus courte. CONCLUSION: Chez la patientèle de chirurgie bariatrique, des stratégies analgésiques peropératoires efficaces qui améliorent le contrôle précoce de la douleur peuvent avoir un impact sur la récupération et l'expérience de la douleur. L'utilisation judicieuse d'opioïdes peropératoires associée à des techniques analgésiques multimodales d'épargne opioïde doit être envisagée et mise en balance avec les préoccupations concernant les effets indésirables liés aux opioïdes dans cette population de patient·es.