¿Se puede predecir el pronóstico de la cadera contralateral tras una artroplastia total de cadera? / Prognosis of the contralateral hip after primary total hip replacement: Can it be predicted?

Introducción: La coxartrosis es una de las patologías más frecuentes e incapacitantes. El 20% de los mayores de 60 años desarrollará coxartrosis sintomática y el 10% requerirá una prótesis total de cadera. La artroplastia total de cadera es uno de los procedimientos quirúrgicos que más aumenta la calidad de vida de estos pacientes. Cuando recomendamos la artroplastia en la práctica clínica, los pacientes a menudo preguntan sobre el pronóstico de su otra cadera: ¿Se deteriorará de la misma forma? ¿Será necesario operarla? ¿Cuándo? El objetivo es determinar si existe alguna variable o signo radiológico que prediga el pronóstico a medio plazo de la cadera contralateral tras una artroplastia total de cadera. Material y métodos: Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo de pacientes intervenidos de artroplastia total de cadera en nuestro hospital durante los años 2011 y 2012, con un total de 543 pacientes. Se determinó el grado de coxartrosis, según las clasificaciones JOA y Tönnis, en la radiografía de ambas caderas en el momento de la primera artroplastia y a intervalos regulares durante el seguimiento, analizando cada uno de los ítems incluidos en estas clasificaciones. Se estableció la relación de estos hallazgos radiográficos con la progresión de la artrosis y la necesidad de artroplastia contralateral. Resultados y conclusiones: Podría esperarse una progresión de la artrosis de la cadera contralateral en los próximos 3 años en el 10% de los pacientes. Esta progresión será mayor y más rápida en aquellos con grado JOA III-IV/Tönnis II-III y, especialmente, en aquellos con mayor estrechamiento articular y mayor alteración de la cabeza femoral, pudiendo alcanzar entre el 25 y el 30% de los pacientes. El grado de JOA/Tönnis inicial es un factor predictor de necesitar una prótesis de cadera contralateral.

Introduction: Coxarthrosis is one of the most frequent and disabling pathologies. 20% of individuals over 60 years of age will develop symptomatic coxarthrosis and 10% of them will need a hip replacement; it is probably one of the orthopaedic procedures that most increases quality of life. When we recommend arthroplasty in clinical practice, patients often ask about the prognosis of their other hip. Will it deteriorate in the same way? Will it be necessary to replace it? When? The aim of the study is to determine if there is any variable or radiological sign that predicts the medium-term prognosis of the contralateral hip after total hip arthroplasty. Material and methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty in our hospital during 2011 and 2012 was carried out, with a total of 543 patients. The coxarthrosis degree at X-ray was determined at the time of the first arthroplasty and at regular intervals during follow-up, according to the JOA and Tönnis classifications, analyzing each of the items included in these classifications. Its relation with the progression of osteoarthritis and the need of contralateral hip replacement was established. Results and conclusions: A progression of osteoarthritis of the contralateral hip could be expected in the next 3 years in 10% of patients. This progression will be greater and faster in those with JOA grade III–IV/Tönnis grade II–III, especially, in those with greater joint narrowing and femoral head shape score, and can reach between 25 and 30% of patients. The initial JOA/Tönnis degree is a predictive factor for requiring a hip replacement on the contralateral side.(AU)

[Translated article] Prognosis of the contralateral hip after primary total hip replacement: Can it be predicted? / ¿Se puede predecir el pronóstico de la cadera contralateral tras una artroplastia total de cadera?

Introduction: Coxarthrosis is one of the most frequent and disabling pathologies. 20% of individuals over 60 years of age will develop symptomatic coxarthrosis and 10% of them will need a hip replacement; it is probably one of the orthopaedic procedures that most increases quality of life. When we recommend arthroplasty in clinical practice, patients often ask about the prognosis of their other hip. Will it deteriorate in the same way? Will it be necessary to replace it? When? The aim of the study is to determine if there is any variable or radiological sign that predicts the medium-term prognosis of the contralateral hip after total hip arthroplasty. Material and methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty in our hospital during 2011 and 2012 was carried out, with a total of 543 patients. The coxarthrosis degree at X-ray was determined at the time of the first arthroplasty and at regular intervals during follow-up, according to the JOA and Tönnis classifications, analyzing each of the items included in these classifications. Its relation with the progression of osteoarthritis and the need of contralateral hip replacement was established. Results and conclusions: A progression of osteoarthritis of the contralateral hip could be expected in the next 3 years in 10% of patients. This progression will be greater and faster in those with JOA grade III–IV/Tönnis grade II–III, especially, in those with greater joint narrowing and femoral head shape score, and can reach between 25 and 30% of patients. The initial JOA/Tönnis degree is a predictive factor for requiring a hip replacement on the contralateral side.(AU)

Introducción: La coxartrosis es una de las patologías más frecuentes e incapacitantes. El 20% de los mayores de 60 años desarrollará coxartrosis sintomática y el 10% requerirá una prótesis total de cadera. La artroplastia total de cadera es uno de los procedimientos quirúrgicos que más aumenta la calidad de vida de estos pacientes. Cuando recomendamos la artroplastia en la práctica clínica, los pacientes a menudo preguntan sobre el pronóstico de su otra cadera: ¿Se deteriorará de la misma forma? ¿Será necesario operarla? ¿Cuándo? El objetivo es determinar si existe alguna variable o signo radiológico que prediga el pronóstico a medio plazo de la cadera contralateral tras una artroplastia total de cadera. Material y métodos: Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo de pacientes intervenidos de artroplastia total de cadera en nuestro hospital durante los años 2011 y 2012, con un total de 543 pacientes. Se determinó el grado de coxartrosis, según las clasificaciones JOA y Tönnis, en la radiografía de ambas caderas en el momento de la primera artroplastia y a intervalos regulares durante el seguimiento, analizando cada uno de los ítems incluidos en estas clasificaciones. Se estableció la relación de estos hallazgos radiográficos con la progresión de la artrosis y la necesidad de artroplastia contralateral. Resultados y conclusiones: Podría esperarse una progresión de la artrosis de la cadera contralateral en los próximos 3 años en el 10% de los pacientes. Esta progresión será mayor y más rápida en aquellos con grado JOA III-IV/Tönnis II-III y, especialmente, en aquellos con mayor estrechamiento articular y mayor alteración de la cabeza femoral, pudiendo alcanzar entre el 25 y el 30% de los pacientes. El grado de JOA/Tönnis inicial es un factor predictor de necesitar una prótesis de cadera contralateral.

Prognosis of the contralateral hip after primary total hip replacement: Can it be predicted? / ¿Se puede predecir el pronóstico de la cadera contralateral tras una artroplastia total de cadera?

INTRODUCTION: Coxarthrosis is one of the most frequent and disabling pathologies. 20% of individuals over 60 years of age will develop symptomatic coxarthrosis and 10% of them will need a hip replacement; it is probably one of the orthopaedic procedures that most increases quality of life. When we recommend arthroplasty in clinical practice, patients often ask about the prognosis of their other hip. Will it deteriorate in the same way? Will it be necessary to replace it? When? The aim of the study is to determine if there is any variable or radiological sign that predicts the medium-term prognosis of the contralateral hip after total hip arthroplasty. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty in our hospital during 2011 and 2012 was carried out, with a total of 543 patients. The coxarthrosis degree at X-ray was determined at the time of the first arthroplasty and at regular intervals during follow-up, according to the JOA and Tönnis classifications, analyzing each of the items included in these classifications. Its relation with the progression of osteoarthritis and the need of contralateral hip replacement was established. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: A progression of osteoarthritis of the contralateral hip could be expected in the next 3 years in 10% of patients. This progression will be greater and faster in those with JOA grade III-IV/Tönnis grade II-III, especially, in those with greater joint narrowing and femoral head shape score, and can reach between 25 and 30% of patients. The initial JOA/Tönnis degree is a predictive factor for requiring a hip replacement on the contralateral side.

Factores de riesgo de luxación en una serie de 2732 prótesis totales de cadera / Risk Factors for Dislocation in a Series of 2732 Total Hip Replacements

Introducción: La luxación de la prótesis total de cadera puede afectar los resultados del implante, la calidad de vida del paciente, y el costo del proceso. Su etiología es multifactorial. Objetivos: Identificar posibles factores de riesgo relacionados con la aparición de luxación en prótesis total de cadera en una serie de casos. Métodos: En una serie de 2732 prótesis total de cadera, en la que hubo 92 luxaciones (3,4 por ciento), se compararon factores relacionados con el paciente, el implante, y la técnica quirúrgica uilizada en el Hospital La Paz-IDIPaz de Madrid entre los años 2000 y 2016. Se utilizó el análisis de regresión para la significación de dichos factores. Resultados: De las 92 luxaciones, 62 fueron tratadas de manera conservadora (67,4 por ciento) y 30 pacientes precisaron de cirugía de revisión (32,6 por ciento). El estudio multivariado mostró significación estadística en los siguientes factores de riesgo: estado de la columna lumbar (p < 0,001), y una pobre reconstrucción del centro de rotación de la cadera (p= 0,035), y cúpulas posicionadas fuera de las ventanas de Lewinnek (p < 0,001) y del mecanismo abductor (p < 0,001) en relación con la técnica quirúrgica. No hubo factores significativos en relación con el tipo de implante, diámetro de la cabeza femoral o par de fricción. Conclusiones: La patología lumbar aumenta el riesgo de luxación en la prótesis total de cadera. Una adecuada reconstrucción de la cadera, que incluya la posición de la cúpula y el centro de rotación de la cadera, así como del mecanismo abductor ayudaría a mejorar la tasa de inestabilidad(AU)

Introduction: The dislocation of the total hip replacement can affect the results of the implant, the quality of life of the patient, and the cost of the process. Its etiology is multifactorial. Objectives: To identify possible risk factors related to the appearance of dislocation in total hip replacement in a series of cases. Methods: In a series of 2732 total hip prostheses, in which there were 92 dislocations (3.4percent), factors related to the patient, the implant, and the surgical technique used at La Paz-IDIPaz Hospital in Madrid were compared, from 2000 to 2016. Regression analysis was used for the significance of these factors. Results: Out of 92 dislocations, 62 were treated conservatively (67.4 percent) and 30 patients required revision surgery (32.6 pecent). The multivariate study showed statistical significance in the following risk factors: state of the lumbar spine (p <0.001), and poor reconstruction of the center of rotation of the hip (p = 0.035), and domes positioned outside Lewinnek windows (p <0.001) and the abductor mechanism (p <0.001) in relation to the surgical technique. There were no significant factors in relation to the type of implant, diameter of the femoral head or friction torque. Conclusions: Lumbar pathology increases the risk of dislocation in total hip replacement. Proper hip reconstruction, including the position of the dome and the center of rotation of the hip, as well as the abductor mechanism, would help to improve the rate of instability(AU)

Comparative cohort study of the SuperPath approach and the conventional posterior approach in primary cementless hip replacement surgery. / Estudio de cohortes comparativo del abordaje Superpath con abordaje convencional posterior en cirugía protésica primaria de cadera no cementada: curva de aprendizaje y resultados a corto plazo.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There is no current consensus on the most suitable hip approach. However, there is a trend to reduce damage to soft tissue, which may have an influence on early outcomes. The SuperPath approach accesses the capsule maintaining integrity of the external rotators. The purpose of this study was to compare the SuperPath approach with the conventional posterior approach, in terms of early outcomes and radiological results. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cohort of 30 patients operated using the SuperPath approach was prospectively matched for age, gender, body mass index and hip function with 60 patients operated using a conventional posterior approach. Clinical evaluation was performed by the Harris score, Merle d'Aubigné score, reduced Western Ontario and McMasters Universities (WOMAC), Short-Form 12 (SF12), IHOT-ADV and IHOT-12 questionnaires. Radiological evaluation was also performed. RESULTS: Preoperatively, no significant differences were detected between cohorts. Skin-to-skin operation time and blood loss was higher in the SuperPath cohort. Length of stay was similar between cohorts. Clinical evaluation improved significantly from the preoperative values to the 1-year follow-up. At 3 months the SuperPath cohort showed better results for IHOT-12, and at 12 months for SF. Radiologically, there were no differences between cohorts. CONCLUSION: This prospective randomized study reveals that the learning curve for the SuperPath approach provides similar outcomes to the conventional posterior approach within the first year after surgery. The Superpath approach was associated with longer skin-to-skin operation time, and greater blood loss.

Primary total hip arthroplasty in Catalonia: What is the clinical evidence that supports our prosthesis? / Artroplastias primarias de cadera implantadas en Cataluña: ¿qué evidencia clínica respalda a nuestras prótesis?

INTRODUCTION: The implementation of National Prostheses Registries allows us to obtain a large amount of data and make conclusions in order to improve the use of them. Sweden was the first country to implement a National Prostheses Registry in 1979. Catalonia has been doing this since 2005. The aim of our study is to analyse the evidence that supports primary total hip replacement in Catalonia in the last 9 years, based on the Arthroplasty Registry of Catalonia (RACat). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A review of the literature was carried out of the prosthesis (acetabular cups/stems) reported in the RACat between the period 2005 to 2013 in the following databases: ODEP (Orthopaedic Data Evaluation Panel), TRIP database, PubMed, and Google Scholar. Those prostheses implanted in less than 10 units (182 acetabular components corresponding to 49 models/228 stems corresponding to 63 models) were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 18,634 (99%) implanted acetabular cups were analysed out of a total number of 18,816, corresponding to 74 different models. In 18 models (2527 acetabular cups) no clinical evidence to support its use was found. An analysis was performed on 19,367 (98.84%) out of a total number of 19,595 implanted stems, corresponding to 75 different models. In 16 models (1845 stems) no clinical evidence was found to support their use. Variable evidence was found in the 56 models of acetabular cups (16,107) and 59 models of stems (17,522), most of it corresponding to level iv clinical evidence. CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant number implanted prostheses evaluated (13.56% acetabular cups/9.5% stems) for which no clinical evidence was found. The elevated number of models is highlighted (49 types for acetabular cups/63 types for stems) with less than 10 units implanted, which corresponds to only 1% of the total implants. The use of arthroplasty registers is shown to be an extremely helpful tool that allows analyses and conclusions to be made for the follow-up and post-marketing surveillance period.

Cirugía de revisión acetabular utilizando un cotilo modular con superficie de metal trabecular de tantalio: resultados a corto plazo / Acetabular revision surgery using a modular acetabular cup coated with trabecular metal of tantalum: short term results

Objectives: To evaluate short-term clinical results of patients performed acetabular revision surgery using a Trabecular Tantalum coated modular acetabular cups. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective and descriptive analysis of a serie of 32 consecutive patients (34 hips) with acetabular revision surgery (23 women, 9 men, mean age 70.7 years), mean follow-up 32 month (12-60). The Paprosky and the AAOS acetabular defects classifications were assessed. According to Paprosky acetabular defects classification, there were eleven type I, two IIA, three IIB, nine IIC, seven IIIA and two IIIB. According to AAOS acetabular defects classification there were thirteen patients with type 1, nine patients with type 2, ten type 3 and two type 4. The percentage of own acetabular bone in contact with the new cup was recorded for each patient at the time of surgery and was 45 percent (range from 20 to 80 percent), with 23 patients presenting less than 50 percent of bone contact (mean 35 percent). Postoperatively, osseous integration was radiographically assessed. Functional results were evaluated according to the Harris Hip Score (HSS). The complications related to the implant were also recorded. Results: In all radiographic assessments performed at 3, 6 and 12 month postoperatively an integrated cup without signs of migration or osteolysis was observed. Four patients (11.8 percent) presented recurrent hip dislocation that required a revision surgery without further cup revision. The final clinical assessment was performed at a mean of 26 month after surgery (12-60) with a mean HHS of 91.8 points. Conclusion: Trabecular tantalum coated modular acetabular cups in acetabular revision surgery shows good short term clinical results even with acetabular defects greater than 50 percent. No cup loosening was observed in these series.

Objetivo: Evaluar los resultados clínicos a corto plazo de pacientes sometidos a cirugía de revisión acetabular utilizando cotilos modulares con superficie de metal trabecular de tantalio. Material y Métodos: Estudio retrospectivo-descriptivo de una serie consecutiva de 32 pacientes (34 caderas) sometidos a cirugía de revisión acetabular (23 mujeres, 9 hombres, edad promedio 70,7 años), seguimiento promedio 32 meses (12-60). Se clasifican los defectos acetabulares de acuerdo ala clasificación de Paprosky y de la AAOS. Según la clasificación de Paprosky de los defectos acetabulares, 11 pacientes tenían categoría I, 2 categoría IIA, 3 categoría IIB, 9 categoría IIC, 7 categoría IIIA y 2 categoría IIIB. Según la clasificación de la AAOS, 13 pacientes correspondieron a nivel 1, 9 pacientes a nivel 2, 10 a nivel 3 y 2 a nivel 4. Se registra el porcentaje de hueso propio acetabular en contacto con el nuevo cotilo de cada paciente que fue en promedio 45 por ciento (20-80 por ciento), presentándose en 23 caderas un porcentaje < 50 por ciento, el cual fue en promedio 35 por ciento. En el postoperatorio se evalúa la integración ósea mediante radiografías de pelvis. Se evalúan los resultados funcionales mediante el HHS (Harris Hip Score) y las complicaciones postoperatorias relacionadas con el implante. Resultados: En todas las radiografías postoperatorias realizadas a los 3, 6 y 12 meses se evidenciaba el cotilo integrado, sin signos de migración ni osteolisis. Cuatro pacientes (11,8 por ciento) presentaron luxaciones recidivantes de cadera, las cuales requirieron de una cirugía de revisión sin recambio del cotilo. La última evaluación clínica fue en promedio 26 meses tras la cirugía (12-60 meses) constatándose un HHS promedio de 91,8 puntos. Conclusión: El uso de cotilos modulares con revestimiento de metal trabecular de tantalio en cirugías de revisión acetabular presenta buenos resultados clínicos a corto plazo incluso en defectos óseos acetabulares superiores...