The pre-transplant evaluation: Considerations for trainees and early career transplant infectious diseases clinician.

Transplant infectious disease (TID) clinicians are integral to the pre-transplantation evaluation. Pre-transplant evaluations allow clinicians to assess risk factors for latent infections and relevant exposures to potential pathogens, address immunizations, and optimize patients' health and understanding of life after transplant. However, there is not a standardized approach to the pre-transplant evaluation. This article reviews the details of performing successful pre-transplant evaluations, including updated recommendations on available vaccines and contemporary opinions on marijuana use. This resource can be used for teaching with trainees or for early career TID clinicians.

Pre-Transplantation Strategies for Infectious Disease Mitigation and Prevention.

Pediatric Infectious Disease (ID) clinicians play a critical role in helping prevent and mitigate infectious risks in children peri- and post-transplantation. Prevention starts during the pre-transplant evaluation and persists throughout the solid organ transplant and hematopoietic cell transplant continuum. The pre-transplant evaluation is an opportunity to screen for latent infections, plan preventative strategies, optimize immunizations, and discuss risk mitigation practices. An ideal pre-transplant evaluation establishes a relationship with the family that further promotes post-transplant infectious risk reduction. This manuscript builds on shared pediatric ID prevention strategies, introduces updated ID testing recommendations for transplant donors/candidates, highlights emerging data, and identifies ongoing knowledge gaps that are potential areas of research.

Approach to vaccinating the pediatric solid organ transplant candidate and recipient.

Solid organ transplantation (SOT) candidates and recipients are at increased risk for morbidity and mortality from vaccine-preventable infections. Children are at particular risk given that they may not have completed their primary immunization series at time of transplant or have acquired natural immunity to pathogens from community exposures. Multiple society guidelines exist for vaccination of SOT candidate and recipients, although challenges remain given limited safety and efficacy data available for pediatric SOT recipients, particularly for live-vaccines. After transplant, individual patient nuances regarding exposure risks and net state of immunosuppression will impact timing of immunizations. The purpose of this review is to provide readers with a concise, practical, expert-opinion on the approach to vaccinating the SOT candidate and recipient and to supplement existing guidelines. In addition, pediatric-specific knowledge gaps in the field and future research priorities will be highlighted.

Characterization of the stanford integrated psychosocial assessment for transplant for heart, liver, and kidney transplant candidates in Japan.

BACKGROUND: The Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation (SIPAT) is a comprehensive psychosocial assessment proven useful for predicting the outcomes of organ transplantation that is expected to be useful in Japan. However, the characteristics of organ-specific SIPAT scores for organ transplant recipient candidates in Japan are unclear and, to date, the SIPAT has not been properly utilized in clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to present basic data that can be used to establish the relation between SIPAT scores and post-transplantation psychosocial outcomes as well as organ-specific outcomes. METHODS: This study included 167 transplant recipient candidates (25 heart, 71 liver, and 71 kidney) who completed a semi-structured interview based on the Japanese version of SIPAT (SIPAT-J) prior to transplantation. The differences between organs in terms of SIPAT scores and differences in SIPAT scores based on demographic data were comparatively analyzed. RESULTS: The total SIPAT scores were higher for liver recipient candidates than for heart recipient candidates (P = .019). Regarding the subscales, SIPAT B (social support system) scores were higher for liver and kidney recipient candidates than for heart recipient candidates (P = .021), whereas SIPAT C (psychological stability and psychopathology) scores were higher for liver recipient candidates than for kidney recipient candidates (P = .002). Recipient candidates with a history of psychiatric treatment and those who were unemployed had higher SIPAT scores, regardless of the transplant organ, than recipient candidates without a history of psychiatric treatment and those who were employed (P < .001, P = .016, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: There were notable differences in the total SIPAT-J and subscale scores among the liver, heart, and kidney recipient candidates. Each organ was associated with specific psychosocial issues that should be addressed before transplantation. Interventions such as information provision and patient education based on SIPAT assessment results for each organ may improve recipient post-transplant outcomes.

A Nominal Group Technique Study of Patients Who Identify as Black or African American and Access to Renal Transplantation.

Introduction: Completion of the renal transplant evaluation has been associated with several barriers for patients who identify as Black or African American. This study sought to prioritize barriers to and motivators of completing the renal transplant evaluation. Methods/Approach: Semi-structured interviews and focus groups with a nominal group technique were used to generate priority scores. Transplant professionals (N = 23) were recruited from 9 transplant centers in the Mid-Atlantic, Mid-Western, and Southeastern parts of the United States. Black or African American identifying renal patients (N = 30) diagnosed with end-stage kidney disease were recruited from 1 transplant center in the Mid-Atlantic region. Findings: Priority scores were created to assess the quantitative data of participant rankings of top barriers and motivators. The most significant barriers identified by both patients and transplant professionals comprised financial constraints, insurance issues, difficulty navigating the healthcare system, transportation difficulties, and multiple health problems. Facilitators consisted of family/social support, transplant education, patient navigators, comprehensive insurance, and physician repertoire and investment. A qualitative description of the ranked factors resulted in themes classified as intrapersonal, health, socioeconomic, transplant-specific healthcare, and general healthcare. Conclusion: These findings provided vital information to transplant centers nationwide about assessing the influences of renal transplant evaluation completion. Achieving equity in access to transplantation for Black or African American renal patients requires multilayered approaches.

The cascade of care in testing and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection in liver transplant candidates.

BACKGROUND: Testing and treatment for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) can mitigate risk of active tuberculosis (TB) post-liver transplant (LT). Testing and treatment completion rates have been reported low in this population. Our study aims to quantify the proportion of LT candidates who completed LTBI care cascade in our center. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted on LT candidates from 2012 to 2021. Primary outcome was the proportion of patients who completed each cascade stage. Secondary outcome was an analysis of factors associated with positive and indeterminate LTBI testing. RESULTS: Of the 273 LT candidates, 265 (97.1%) were referred to transplant infectious disease (TID), 264 (96.7%) had orders for interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA), 262 (96%) underwent TID evaluation, and 259 (94.9%) completed IGRA. Twenty had LTBI, and 18 were treatment naïve and recommended for treatment. Of the 18, 15 (83.3%) agreed to therapy, 14 (77.8%) initiated treatment, and 12 (66.7%) completed treatment. No posttransplant TB reactivation occurred. Patients born in Asia, previous incarceration, past military service, and granuloma findings on chest imaging were likely to have positive IGRA (p < .05). Older age and travel to TB-endemic countries were likely to have indeterminate IGRA (p < .05). Indeterminate IGRAs were more common in QuantiFERON (QTF)-Gold Plus TB (15.3%) versus QTF-Gold TB (9.3%, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: High rates of LTBI testing and treatment initiation and completion can be attributed to a standardized process that includes TID evaluation. Future studies in larger cohort are needed to better understand factors that can optimize the completion rates of LTBI treatment in LT candidates.

Utilidad de la tomografía computada de cavidades paranasales como evaluación otorrinolaringológica pretrasplante renal / Usefulness of computed tomography of the paranasal sinus as a kidney pre-transplant otorhinolaryngological evaluation

Resumen Introducción: El trasplante renal corresponde al tratamiento de elección para la enfermedad renal crónica. No existe un protocolo universalmente aceptado para la evaluación otorrinolaringológica del receptor del riñón a implantar, existiendo una gran heterogeneidad en su práctica. La tomografía computada de cavidades paranasales es uno de los estudios más habitualmente utilizados para descartar patologías otorrinolaringológicas que contraindiquen la intervención. Objetivo: Describir los hallazgos imagenológicos de las tomografías computadas solicitadas como evaluación pretrasplante renal. Determinar si estos hallazgos condicionaron una contraindicación para trasplante o algún cambio en el manejo del paciente. Material y Método: Estudio descriptivo de corte transversal mediante la revisión de fichas clínicas de pacientes derivados a estudio pretrasplante renal durante el año 2018 en el Hospital Carlos Van Buren. Resultados: Se obtuvo información de 40 pacientes derivados para evaluación otorrinolaringológica. El promedio de edad fue de 49 ± 11,4 años; 55% fueron mujeres. La causa más frecuente de enfermedad renal fue idiopática (70%). A 34 de 40 pacientes se les solicitó evaluación tomográfica. A cinco pacientes se les indicó corticoides intranasales y se derivó un paciente a evaluación dental. No se generó ninguna contraindicación para el trasplante renal. Discusión: Existe poca literatura sobre la utilidad de la tomografía de cavidades paranasales como estudio pretrasplante renal. En el presente estudio no se encontró ningún hallazgo que contraindicara la intervención. Conclusión: Se necesitan más estudios para poder asegurar si la evaluación otorrinolaringológica y el uso de tomografía tiene alguna implicancia en la evolución de los pacientes sometidos a trasplante renal.

Abstract Introduction: Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for chronic kidney disease. There is no universally accepted protocol for the otorhinolaryngological evaluation of the recipient, and there is heterogeneity in clinical practice. Computed tomography of the paranasal cavities is one of the most commonly used studies to rule out otorhinolaryngological pathologies that contraindicate the intervention. Aim: To describe the imaging findings of the computed tomographies requested as a pre-transplant evaluation. To determine if these findings determined a contraindication for transplantation or any change in the patient's management. Material and Method: Descriptive cross-sectional study by reviewing the clinical records of patients referred to a pre-kidney transplant study during 2018 at the Hospital Carlos Van Buren. Results: Information was obtained from 40 patients referred for otorhinolaryngological evaluation. The average age was 49 ± 11.4 years; 55% were women. The most common cause of kidney disease was idiopathic (70%). 34 of 40 patients had a computed tomography. Five patients received intranasal corticosteroids and one patient was referred for dental evaluation. There were no contraindications for renal transplantation. Conclusion: There is little literature on the usefulness of paranasal cavity tomography as a pre-kidney transplant study. In the present study, no finding was found that would contraindicate the intervention. More studies are needed to be able to ascertain whether the otorhinolaryngological evaluation and the use of tomography have any implications in the evolution of patients undergoing kidney transplantation.

Cryoablation for Renal Cell Carcinoma Prior to Liver Transplantation: A Case Report.

Extrahepatic malignancies are a relatively rare incidental finding during liver transplant work-up that provides a significant barrier to continued transplant evaluation and requires treatment to limit the risk of recurrence. There have only been 11 previously reported cases of pre-liver transplant renal cell carcinoma (RCC), of which all underwent partial or radical nephrectomy. Percutaneous cryoablation therapy has been gaining acceptance as a curative treatment alternative for RCC and is a new therapeutic standard for patients who are poor candidates for surgical resection. Recent studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of cryoablation for RCC in native kidneys and in solid masses in kidney allografts, but there is no data on the efficacy or recurrence of RCC when cryoablation is used for the treatment of RCC in a native kidney prior to solid organ transplantation. The patient underwent percutaneous cryoablation therapy of a T1a RCC of the native kidney 10 months prior to orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) without subsequent partial or radical nephrectomy. At seven years post-ablation therapy, the patient has no evidence of tumor recurrence despite immunosuppressive therapy post-transplantation. Cryoablation is potentially a safe and highly effective means of treating RCC in patients who are not candidates for nephrectomy secondary to complications associated with end-stage liver disease. In our case, the patient was treated with cryoablation and received standard post-transplant immunosuppression without recurrence of RCC at seven years. More studies are needed to determine inclusion and exclusion criteria for cryoablation and to confirm long-term efficacy as well as a strategy for duration and frequency of surveillance in these patients.

Psychosocial Pre-Transplant Screening With the Transplant Evaluation Rating Scale Contributes to Prediction of Survival After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

There is no standard in hematopoietic stem cell transplantations (HSCT) for pre-transplant screening of psychosocial risk factors, e.g., regarding immunosuppressant non-adherence. The aim of this prospective study is to explore the predictive value of the pretransplant psychosocial screening instrument Transplant Evaluation Rating Scale (TERS) for mortality in a 3-year follow-up. Between 2012 and 2017 61 patients were included and classified as low (TERS = 26.5-29) and increased-risk group (TERS = 29.5-79.5). Both groups were compared regarding mortality until 36 months after transplantation and secondary outcomes [Medication Experience Scale for Immunosuppressants (MESI); incidence/grade of GvHD]. The increased-risk group (n = 28) showed significantly worse cumulative survival in the outpatient setting (from 3 months to 3 years after HSCT) [Log Rank (Mantel Cox) P = 0.029] compared to low-risk group (n = 29) but there was no significant result for the interval immediately after HSCT until 3 years afterwards. Pre-transplant screening with TERS contributes to prediction of survival after HSCT. The reason remains unclear, since TERS did not correlate with GvHD or MESI. The negative result regarding the interval immediately after HSCT until 3 years could be caused by the intensive in-patient setting with mortality which is explained rather by biological reasons than by non-adherence.

Pre-transplant evaluation completion for Black/African American renal patients: Two theoretical frameworks.

OBJECTIVE: Black/African Americans (B/AA) are less likely to complete the pre-transplant evaluation for kidney transplantation despite higher prevalence rates of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). To better understand the barriers and motivators to completing the evaluation process, two qualitative studies were conducted to categorize and elucidate the relationships between these factors. METHODS: In Phase I, semi-structured interviews were conducted with a stratified purposeful sample of transplant professionals (N = 23). Focus groups were conducted during Phase II with a purposeful sample of B/AA patients (N = 30). RESULTS: Thematic analyses assessed using grounded theory revealed a multitude of factors at individual and systemic levels, including health and informational/educational-related factors. Two comprehensive theoretical frameworks, a socio-ecological model of barriers and a model of motivators are presented. Medical mistrust is an example of a community factor identified as impeding completion rates. Systemic motivators included compressed time for testing and fewer intervals between doctor's appointments. CONCLUSIONS: This study offers a structure for understanding impediments to and facilitators of pre-transplant evaluation completion as seen through the eyes of both B/AA ESRD patients seeking transplant and the providers who work with them. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Recommendations for intervention and systemic changes to narrow health disparities are discussed.

False-Positive Serum Cocaine Screening Results in Patients Undergoing Evaluation for Renal Transplant.

Drug screening during pre-transplant evaluations can have major implications for patient care, particularly because drug abuse has been associated with poor transplant outcomes. Although urine drug screening is usually preferred, serum testing is available for situations such as anuria due to end stage renal disease. However, there are few studies evaluating serum drug screening in specific populations such as patients undergoing kidney transplant evaluation. All serum drug screens ordered between January 2015 and November 2017 on patients being evaluated for renal transplant were compared against a large population of serum drug screens ordered from other institutions. Cocaine screening and confirmation results were evaluated to determine false positives. Cocaine screens were positive in 23 of 537 (4.3%) pre-transplant samples, and 211 of 5,115 (4.1%) comparison samples. Confirmation testing demonstrated that 14 (60.9%) pre-transplant samples were false positives, which was significantly (P < 0.01) higher than the rate of false positives in the comparison group (47/211, 22.3%). No common medication or other cross-reacting substance could be identified in the pre-transplant cohort to explain the false-positive results. Although serum cocaine screening had a low overall false-positive rate, the proportion of false positives was significantly higher in pre-transplant patients. Given the poor transplant outcomes associated with drug abuse, failure to properly interpret screening results as being false positives could negatively affect patient care. All members of the transplant team should recognize the importance of confirmation testing in this setting, to avoid unintended consequences due to false-positive screening results.

Radiation exposure from medical imaging in dialyzed patients undergoing renal pre-transplant evaluation.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Ionizing radiation exposure from medical procedures is rising sharply-the per-capita annual effective dose in the US is 3.0 millisieverts (mSv). Hemodialyzed and kidney transplanted patients receive still higher doses of ionizing radiation due to the presence of multiple comorbidities. The aim of this study was to assess the cumulative effective dose (CED) among dialyzed patients undergoing renal pre-transplant evaluation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated 70 hemodialysis patients between June 2009 and December 2014, aged 46.4 ± 12.0 years. The number and type of radiologic procedures were collected through the Radiology Information System. CED was expressed as total mSv/patient and annual CED (mSv/patient/year). RESULTS: A total of 744 radiologic procedures were performed, accounting for 3869 mSv of ionizing radiation: conventional radiology, computed tomography and nuclear medicine accounted for 78, 14 and 8 % of the procedures, but they represented, respectively, 8, 83 and 9 % of the total CED. The mean (median) annual CED was 35 (7) mSv/patient/year, while total CED was 72 (32) mSv/patient. Thirty-seven patients were active waitlisted and received 47 (10) mSv during the pre-transplant evaluation and 36 (5) mSv during the waiting phase to maintain active status. Concerning cancer risk, 4 (7 %) patients were classified at low risk (<3 mSv/year), 19 (35 %) at moderate risk (3 to <20 mSv/year), 8 (15 %) at high risk (20 to <50 mSv/year), and 23 (43 %) at very high risk (≥50 mSv/year). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that during renal pre-transplant evaluation, dialyzed patients receive a high dose of ionizing radiation. Considering that transplanted individuals have a high incidence of cancer due to multifactorial etiology, it is mandatory to reduce the ionizing radiation imaging.

Pre-transplant impedance measures of reflux are associated with early allograft injury after lung transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Acid reflux has been associated with poorer outcomes after lung transplantation. Standard pre-transplant reflux assessment has not been universally adopted. Non-acid reflux may also induce a pulmonary inflammatory cascade, leading to acute and chronic rejection. Esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH testing (MII-pH) may be valuable in standard pre-transplant evaluation. We assessed the association between pre-transplant MII-pH measures and early allograft injury in lung transplant patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of lung transplant recipients who underwent pre-transplant MII-pH at a tertiary center from 2007 to 2012. Results from pre-transplant MII-pH, cardiopulmonary function testing, and results of biopsy specimen analysis of the transplanted lung were recorded. Time-to-event analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards and Kaplan-Maier methods to assess the associations between MII-pH measures and development of acute rejection or lymphocytic bronchiolitis. RESULTS: Thirty patients (46.7% men; age, 54.2 years) met the inclusion criteria. Pre-transplant cardiopulmonary function and pulmonary diagnoses were similar between outcome groups. Prolonged bolus clearance (hazard ratio [HR], 4.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.34-12.57; p = 0.01), increased total distal reflux episodes (HR, 4.80; 95% CI, 1.33-17.25; p = 0.02), and increased total proximal reflux episodes (HR, 4.43; 95% CI, 1.14-17.31; p = 0.03) were significantly associated with decreased time to early allograft injury. Kaplan-Meier curves also demonstrated differences in time to rejection by prolonged bolus clearance (p = 0.01) and increased total distal reflux episodes (p = 0.01). Sub-group analysis including only patients with MII-pH performed off proton pump inhibitors (n = 24) showed similar results. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged bolus clearance, increased total distal reflux episodes, and increased total proximal reflux episodes on pre-transplant MII-pH were associated with decreased time to early allograft injury after lung transplantation. Routine pre-transplant MII-pH may provide clinically relevant data regarding transplant outcomes and peri-transplant care.

A single-center analysis of abdominal imaging in the evaluation of kidney transplant recipients.

Many transplantation programs utilize noninvasive abdominal and pelvic imaging in the pre-operative evaluation of recipient candidates. Practice patterns vary, and consensus guidelines addressing the risks and benefits of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the pre-transplant evaluation process do not currently exist. In this single-center study, we examined the frequency, clinical significance, and associated costs of CT and MRI findings during the pre-transplant evaluation of renal transplant recipients. A retrospective chart review of 3041 adult patients who underwent a CT/CTA or MRI/MRA of the abdomen and pelvis for pre-transplant evaluation between 2005 and 2010 was performed. Pre-transplant imaging with MRI offered a more sensitive evaluation in comparison with CT, with the notable exception of abnormalities in which calcium was detected. Patients imaged with CT had a significantly greater proportion of subsequent clinical actions arising from imaging findings. The total financial cost of MRI was greater than that of CT. No cases of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) in patients who received MultiHance gadolinium contrast were reported. In conclusion, the risks, benefits, and costs of CT/CTA and MRI/MRA must be carefully considered to optimize the pre-operative evaluation of renal transplant recipients.