Neonatal Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury: A Proposed Pathogenic Sequence in the Context of Maternal/Fetal Vascular Malperfusion and Paradoxical Embolism.

BACKGROUND: Neonatal myocardial infarction (MI) in a structurally normal heart is frequently an obscure event that remains undiagnosed until autopsy. Causal attributions usually cite underlying maternal or fetal conditions. Refinement in understanding of pathogenic mechanisms underlying neonatal MI is key to advancements in diagnosis, prevention, treatments and prognosis. OBJECTIVE: This study presents a 36-week gestational age female with perinatal asphyxia, congenital hemolytic anemia and umbilical vein thrombosis who sustained catastrophic MI with reperfusion injury; and it reviews pertinent literature. RESULTS: We propose a pathogenic sequence that links maternal vascular malperfusion, fetal vascular malperfusion, hemolytic anemia, umbilical venous thrombosis, and paradoxical thromboemboli. CONCLUSION: This case highlights the importance of placental examination in connecting complex neonatal events with adverse maternal/placental conditions. A high index of suspicion is essential for early diagnosis of neonatal MI.

Comparación de las medidas obtenidas por resonancia magnética con reconstrucción tridimensional y las obtenidas por angiografía digital para el diagnóstico de coartación de aorta / Comparison between the measurements obtained by magnetic resonance and digital angiography in patients with aortic coarctation

Introducción. La angiografía digital (AD) transcateterismo es el estándar de oro en el diagnóstico de la coartación de aorta (CoAo) aunque la resonancia magnética (RM) ha mostrado utilidad en la evaluación del sistema cardiovascular. La medición de los segmentos del arco aórtico facilita la selección de los candidatos para angioplastia transcateterismo evitando una cirugía torácica. No hay reportes de estudios comparativos de las medidas de los diferentes segmentos aórticos, obtenidas por RM y AD. Material y métodos. Se estudiaron 49 pacientes con RM y AD que ingresaron con CoAo entre enero de 2002 y diciembre de 2003. Se determinó el tipo de CoAo. Se midieron los segmentos aórticos por RM y AD y se compararon por medio de correlación lineal (Pearson). En 43 pacientes se realizó angioplastia con globo. Resultados. La variabilidad en la medición de los diferentes segmentos entre ambos métodos fueron: aorta ascendente 1.99-2.10 mm (desviación estándar (DE) 2.7-2.8), arco aórtico 1.79-2 mm (DE 2.55-2.99), istmo 1.53-1.56 mm (DE 2-2.17), aorta descendente 1.75-1.78 mm (DE 2.54-2.55). Las medidas comparadas por correlación lineal muestran r entre 0.80 y 0.999, excepto en arco aórtico por RM que obtuvo r de 0.57. Conclusión. La evaluación con RM de niños con CoAo puede sustituir a la realizada mediante AD ya que una variación de 1.5 a 2.1 mm en las medidas obtenidas por ambos métodos no interfiere con la decisión terapéutica. Sólo debe realizarse la medición del arco aórtico en 2 proyecciones.

Introduction. Quantitative aortic arch analysis may improve the selection of candidates for angioplasty who are most likely to benefit from the procedure. Digital angiography (DA) has traditionally been the definitive preoperative diagnostic procedure for aortic coarctation (AoCo), but magnetic resonance (MR) imaging affords good spatial resolution and excellent contrast between blood vessels and soft tissues and offers great potential for delineating thoracic cardiovascular structures. Material and methods. Forty nine patients with AoCo were examined with MR and DA between June 2002 and December 2003. The site and type of AoCo were determined and the measurements of aortic arch segments were obtained. We realized balloon angioplasty in 43 patients. Results. We compared the measurements using Pearson's linear correlation. The variability of the measurements was: ascending aorta 1.99-2.1 mm (standard deviation [SD] 2.7-2.8), aortic arch 1.79-2 mm (SD 2.55-2.99), aortic isthmus 1.53-1.56 mm (SD 2-2.17), and descending aorta 1.75-1.78 mm (SD 2.54-2.55). The lineal correlation of Pearson for measurements were; r =0.80-0.999 but the aortic arch was r =0.57 by MR. Conclusion. We conclude that quantitative MR measurements of aorta may be used to diagnose of AoCo and avoid using DA. To obtain precise measurements of aortic arch in patients with AoCo, MR should include 2 projections.