Results of Levofloxacin Prophylaxis Timing in Autologous and Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background Despite preventive measures and varying antibiotic recommendations, bacterial infections continue to pose a significant threat to individuals undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Levofloxacin prophylaxis is commonly used, but the optimal timing for initiation is debated. This study aims to assess infection outcomes based on timing of levofloxacin prophylaxis (initiation at the first day of conditioning vs. after infusion of stem cells) in autologous and allogeneic HSCT patients. Methods We compared infectious episodes, responsible pathogens, and clinical outcomes based on the implementation of levofloxacin prophylaxis in patients receiving autologous or allogeneic HSCT procedures. This retrospective single-center study involved a review of the medical records of autologous and allogeneic HSCT patients treated at our adult stem cell transplantation unit between 2018 and 2020. The study included 23 patients who underwent autologous HSCT and 12 patients who underwent allogeneic HSCT. We compared the demographic data, febrile neutropenia, proven bacterial infections, and 30-day survival among the autologous and allogeneic transplant groups, including those who received oral levofloxacin 500 mg/day prophylaxis. Results Positive blood cultures (26.1% vs. 75%; p = 0.011), mean neutrophil engraftment (10.6±1.2 vs. 14.8±1.3; p<0.001), and mean platelet engraftment (11.2±1.1 vs. 15.4±3.2; p = 0.004) were all lower in autologous transplant patients versus their allogeneic counterparts. When each type of HSCT was evaluated within the same type, there were no observed differences in infection frequency, infection type, or 30-day mortality between the patient groups with different levofloxacin initiation times. Conclusion Healthcare professionals should choose the most appropriate timing for initiating levofloxacin prophylaxis based on individual patient factors and clinical circumstances while considering the cost-effectiveness implications. Further research with a larger sample size and prospective design is needed to support our findings.

A Comparative Analysis of Prophylactic Antibiotic Administration in Emergency Surgery Versus Elective Surgery: A Comprehensive Review.

Surgical site infections (SSIs) contribute to increased patient morbidity, prolonged hospital stays, and substantial healthcare costs. Prophylactic antibiotics play a pivotal role in mitigating the risk of SSIs, with their administration being a standard practice before both emergency and elective surgeries. This paper provides a comprehensive review and comparative analysis of the benefits of prophylactic antibiotic administration in emergency surgery versus elective surgery. Through a systematic literature review and analysis of relevant studies identified through PubMed searches, this paper highlights the specific benefits of prophylactic antibiotics between emergency and elective surgeries. The findings underscore the importance of tailored antibiotic regimens and administration protocols to optimize patient care and promote successful surgical outcomes in diverse clinical settings. Further research is warranted to refine guidelines and enhance understanding of the relationship between prophylactic antibiotics and surgical outcomes across different surgical contexts.

Are prophylactic antibiotics required for combined intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy of gynecologic cancers?

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the need for prophylactic antibiotic treatment prior to combined intracavitary and interstitial (hybrid) brachytherapy for gynecologic cancer. A total of 105 gynecologic cancer patients received 405 brachytherapy sessions, including 302 sessions of intracavitary brachytherapy and 103 sessions of hybrid brachytherapy. Prophylactic antibiotics were administered before 35% of the hybrid brachytherapy sessions. The incidence of postbrachytherapy fever and the frequency of subsequent antibiotic use for infection were compared between treatment groups. Among patients treated with hybrid brachytherapy, fever ≥37.5°C occurred in 16.4% of those not receiving prophylactic antibiotics and 16.7% of those receiving prophylactic antibiotics (P > 0.05). Similarly, fever ≥38.0°C occurred in 4.9% of patients not receiving prophylactic antibiotics and 2.4% of those receiving prophylactic antibiotics (P > 0.05). Additional antibiotics were used to treat postbrachytherapy infections in 4.8% of the group receiving prophylactic antibiotics and 0% of those not receiving prophylactic antibiotics, again without statistically significant difference. There were also no significant differences in posttreatment fever incidence and antibiotics use for infection between intracavitary brachytherapy and hybrid brachytherapy sessions. In conclusion, the incidences of infection and fever are low following hybrid brachytherapy, so prophylactic antibiotics are generally unnecessary.

PROPHYLACTIC ANTIBIOTICS DURING THE IMPLANT PROSTHETIC PHASE MAY NOT SUBSTANTIALLY DECREASE THE INCIDENCE OF INFECTIOUS COMPLICATIONS.

ARTICLE TITLE AND BIBLIOGRAPHIC INFORMATION: Does the Prosthetic Phase of Dental Implants Justify the Prescription of Preventive Antibiotics in Healthy Patients? A Systematic Review. Salgado-Peralvo AO, Uribarri A, Peña-Cardelles JF, Kewalramani N, Rodríguez JLG, Velasco-Ortega E. J Oral Implantol. 2023 Feb 1;49(1):93-101. SOURCE OF FUNDING: The authors declared that no funding was received to support the study. TYPE OF STUDY/DESIGN: Systematic review.

Peripartum interventions for people with class III obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify evidence-based peripartum interventions for people with a body mass index ≥40 kg/m2. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, CINAHL, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to 2022 without date, publication type, or language restrictions. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Cohort and randomized controlled trials that implemented an intervention and evaluated peripartum outcomes of people with a body mass index ≥40 kg/m2 were included. The primary outcome depended on the intervention but was commonly related to wound morbidity after cesarean delivery (ie, infection, separation, hematoma). METHODS: Meta-analysis was completed for interventions with at least 2 studies. Pooled risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals and heterogeneity (I2 statistics) were reported. RESULTS: Of 20,301 studies screened, 30 studies (17 cohort and 13 randomized controlled trials) encompassing 10 types of interventions were included. The interventions included delivery planning (induction of labor, planned cesarean delivery), antibiotics during labor induction or for surgical prophylaxis, 6 types of cesarean delivery techniques, and anticoagulation dosing after a cesarean delivery. Planned cesarean delivery compared with planned vaginal delivery did not improve outcomes according to 3 cohort studies. One cohort study compared 3 g with 2 g of cephazolin prophylaxis for cesarean delivery and found no differences in surgical site infections. According to 3 cohort studies and 2 randomized controlled trials, there was no improvement in outcomes with a non-low transverse skin incision. Ten studies (4 cohort and 6 randomized controlled trials) met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. Two randomized controlled trials compared subcuticular closure with suture vs staples after cesarean delivery and found no differences in wound morbidity within 6 weeks of cesarean delivery (n=422; risk ratio, 1.09; 95% confidence interval, 0.75-1.59; I2=9%). Prophylactic negative-pressure wound therapy was compared with standard dressing in 4 cohort and 4 randomized controlled trials, which found no differences in wound morbidity (cohort n=2200; risk ratio, 1.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.88-1.63; I2=66.1%) or surgical site infections (randomized controlled trial n=1262; risk ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-1.29; I2=0). CONCLUSION: Few studies address interventions in people with a body mass index ≥40 kg/m2, and most studies did not demonstrate a benefit. Either staples or suture are recommended for subcuticular closure, but available data do not support prophylactic negative-pressure wound therapy after cesarean delivery for people with a body mass index ≥40 kg/m2.

Epidemiology and risk factors of nosocomial infections in a Chinese tertiary-care hospital: a 10-year retrospective case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Nosocomial infections (NIs) are the most frequent adverse events among patients and cause a heavy burden on both health and economics. To investigate epidemiology of NIs and identify risk factors for NIs by integrating continuous long-term surveillance data. METHODS: We performed an observational study among inpatients at the Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2019. Infection rates, mortality rates and percentage of NIs were calculated. Trends of yearly infection rates by pathogens were assessed using Mann-Kendall trend test. Controls were matched to cases (2:1) by age (±2 years), sex, admission date (±1 year) and admission diagnosis, and conditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios. RESULTS: A total of 1,534,713 inpatients were included among which 33,468 NIs cases occurred with an infection rate of 2.18%. The most common infections were respiratory system infection (52.22%), bloodstream infection (17.60%), and genitourinary system infection (15.62%). Acinetobacter. baumannii (9.6%), Klebsiella. pneumoniae (9.0%), Pseudomonas. aeruginosa (8.6%), Escherichia. coli (8.6%) and Enterococcus. faecium (5.0%) were the top five isolated pathogens. Infection rates of K. pneumoniae and carbapenems-resistant K. pneumoniae significantly increased. Prior ICU stay, surgery, any device placement (including central venous catheter, mechanical ventilation, urinary catheter, and tracheotomy), prior use of triple or more antibiotics combinations, carbapenem, and ß-Lactamase inhibitors were significantly associated with NIs. CONCLUSION: K. pneumoniae has the potential to cause a clinical crisis with increasing infection rates and carbapenem resistance. Clinical management of invasive operations and antibiotics use should be further strengthened.

Bicuspid Aortic Valve Endocarditis Caused by Streptococcus sanguinis: A Case Report.

Antibiotic prophylaxis prior to dental work in bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) patients is currently a matter of debate. The American Dental Association does not require those with native BAV to receive antibiotic prophylaxis prior to dental work as BAV is considered an "intermediate" risk for infective endocarditis (IE). We present the case of a 63-year-old male, with a medical history of BAV, who acquired Streptococcus sanguinis IE after a routine dental cleaning four months prior to initial onset of symptoms. He exhibited new-onset and severe aortic regurgitation at presentation, requiring urgent aortic valve replacement to restore valve function. BAV patients are at high risk of IE, emphasizing the need for prophylactic antibiotics in dental cleaning as well as invasive dental procedures in those with BAV.

Knowledge and Attitude Toward Antibiotic Prescription Among Dental Students and Interns at Multiple Universities in Saudi Arabia.

BACKGROUND: Dental students in Saudi Arabia are authorized to write prescriptions for antibiotics during practical training. Adverse side effects and resistance could result from inappropriate prescription. Accordingly, there is a need to evaluate the knowledge of dental students regarding guidelines and applications of antibiotic prescription. OBJECTIVES: To assess the knowledge and attitude toward guidelines and applications of antibiotic prescription among dental students and interns at multiple universities in Saudi Arabia. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among dental students in their final clinical years (4th to 6th year) and dental interns. The study data were collected using a valid and reliable structured questionnaire comprising three domains: 1) demographic characteristics, 2) knowledge, and 3) attitude toward antibiotic prescription for dental and systemic conditions. The data were analyzed and presented as frequency percentages, and the chi-square test was used to compare the knowledge and attitude items between the dental students and interns. The statistical significance level was set at p ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 248 participants (women: 55.6%, men: 44.4%) were included in the study. Approximately 21.8% were 4th year students; 17.7%, 5th year students; 12.9%, 6th year students; and 47.6%, interns. For most items, the knowledge level was relatively high, and the attitude was generally positive among the participants. Approximately, 87.1% had good knowledge about current guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis, 83.9% about antibiotic prescription, and 95.2% about antibiotic resistance. The interns showed significantly higher knowledge levels and favorable attitude, particularly for guidelines and applications of antibiotic prescription and correct use of antibiotics for oral cases, than did the students. Amoxicillin was the most frequently prescribed antibiotic among the participants. CONCLUSION: The interns and 6th-year students demonstrated a relatively high knowledge level and positive attitude toward appropriate antibiotic prescriptions. However, deficiencies were observed among the students in their early clinical years, particularly for systemic conditions. These findings highlight the importance of implementing educational campaigns and providing guidelines to promote the appropriate use of antibiotics among dental students in their final clinical years.

Antibiotic utilization in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: a multi-institutional study and review of the literature.

PURPOSE: Utilization of antibiotics for endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (endo-DCR) is largely dependent on individual surgeon preference. This study aimed to investigate prescribing practices of pre-, peri-, and postoperative antibiotics and effects on postoperative infection rates in patients who underwent endo-DCR. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of institutional data at two academic centers of endo-DCR cases from 2015-2020 was performed. Postoperative infection rates for patients who received pre-, peri-, and postoperative antibiotics, individually or in combination, and those who did not, were compared via odds ratio and ANOVA linear regression. RESULTS: 331 endo-DCR cases were included; 22 cases (6.6%) had a postoperative infection. There was no significant difference in the infection rates between patients without an active preoperative dacryocystitis who received different permutations of peri- and postoperative antibiotics. Patients who received preoperative antibiotics within two weeks of surgery for preexisting acute dacryocystitis, but did not receive peri- or postoperative antibiotics, had a higher rate of postoperative infections (p = 008). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest antibiotics may be beneficial only when patients have a recent or active dacryocystitis prior to surgery. Otherwise, our data do not support the routine use of antibiotic prophylaxis in endo-DCR.

The effect of prophylactic antibiotics in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding patients in the emergency department.

BACKGROUND: Currently, prophylactic antibiotics are recommended only for cirrhotic patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGIB); however, the benefit for other AUGIB patients remains undetermined. We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes between patients with AUGIB with and without prophylactic antibiotics to identify the population that requires this therapy. METHODS: Patients with AUGIB admitted between 1st January 2019 and 31st December 2021 in the Emergency Department of Peking Union Medical College Hospital were enrolled. Patients were divided into the antibiotic and non-antibiotic groups. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, and the secondary outcome was the onset of new infection. The risk factors for mortality and infection were analyzed, and stratification analysis of prophylactic antibiotics was performed. Continuous data were analyzed using the t-test or nonparametric rank sum test, and categorical data were analyzed using the Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. Indicators with significant differences between the groups were included for logistic regression analysis. A P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 392 individuals were included, among them, 281 patients received prophylactic antibiotics, and 111 patients did not receive prophylactic antibiotics. The mortality rates were significantly lower in the antibiotic group than in the non-antibiotics group (6.41% vs. 17.12%, P=0.001). The risk factors for infection were varicose veins (P=0.045) and endotracheal intubation (P=0.005) in the prophylactic antibiotic group, and endoscopic treatment (P=0.010) in the non-prophylactic antibiotic group. Stratified analyses showed that patients with age ≥ 65 years, endotracheal intubation, endoscopic treatment, and AUGIB of variceal etiologies benefited from prophylactic antibiotics. CONCLUSION: AUGIB patients may benefit from prophylactic antibiotics to decrease mortality, especially those aged ≥ 65 years and those with endotracheal intubation, endoscopic treatment, and variceal etiologies.

Role of Prophylactic Dose of Oral Amoxicillin Trihydrate in Prevention of Bacteremia Post Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar: A Clinical Study.

The current study is designed to evaluate the efficacy of pre-operative prophylactic antibiotic for prevention of bacteremia after surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar SRIMTM. The study was carried out as an open clinical trial. Fifty patients who fulfilled the criteria were included. Twenty five randomly selected patients (study group) were administered two grams oral dose of amoxicillin trihydrate, one hour prior to the procedure. Twenty five patients (control group) were not administered any antibiotic prior to the procedure. All patients underwent surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar through intraoral approach under local anesthesia. Blood culture for detection of aerobic and anaerobic micro-organisms was done for all 50 patients. Eleven out of the twenty five patients (44%) in the control group showed positive growth, including mixed growth (aerobic and anaerobic). Seven patients showed purely anaerobic, 2 patients purely aerobic and two mixed growth. In the study (antibiotic) group, 7 out of the 25 patients (28%) showed positive growth, including mixed growth. Three patients showed purely anaerobic, 2 patients purely aerobic and 2 mixed type of growth. The study suggests that the judicious use of antibiotic prophylaxis, in conjunction with optimal oral health care serves to minimize the adverse effects of antibiotic therapy; and at the same time reduce the significant morbidity and mortality associated with systemic infections that might occur due to bacteremia resulting from surgical procedures of the oral cavity.

Antibiotic Utilization and Prophylaxis in Paediatric Cardiac Surgery: A Retrospective Observational Study at a Rural Tertiary Care Hospital in India.

Introduction Antimicrobial prophylaxis, involving short antibiotic courses preceding surgical procedures, is recommended to minimize postoperative infections. Paediatric cardiac surgeries are classified as clean procedures, though infection challenges persist due to illness severity and extended ICU stays. Antimicrobial prophylaxis varies, ranging from single doses to extended administration until catheters are removed. Typically lasting 24 to 48 hours, it has proven infection-reduction benefits. Despite these practices, uncertainties surround the optimal nature, timing, and duration of administration. This concern is amplified by escalating antimicrobial resistance driven by antibiotic overuse. Vulnerable paediatric populations bear heightened consequences of irrational antimicrobial use, contributing to global resistance trends. Yet, a defined optimal prophylaxis schedule for paediatric cardiac surgery is lacking. Importing adult guidelines may be inadequate due to paediatric research complexities and population diversity. Developing effective prophylaxis protocols is crucial for children undergoing cardiac surgery, given global antibiotic overuse and evolving drug resistance. Establishing an optimal prophylactic strategy remains a challenge, necessitating further research for evidence-based protocols to mitigate infections in this vulnerable patient cohort. Methods This study investigates antibiotic use in paediatric cardiac surgery. A retrospective analysis of 100 patients from a rural Indian hospital (2017-2018) assesses antibiotic patterns, including type, dose, duration, and adherence to prophylaxis protocols. Results In the studied cohort of paediatric cardiac surgery patients, complete compliance (100%) with antibiotic prophylaxis was observed. However, deviations were identified: 30% received antibiotics prematurely, and 30% did not align with institutional protocol criteria. Concerning antibiotic selection, 87% followed hospital policy with the recommended cefoperazone and sulbactam combination plus amikacin, while 9% received piperacillin/tazobactam + amikacin due to sepsis. Irregular use (22%) based on clinical records occurred. Furthermore, 4% received piperacillin/tazobactam + teicoplanin, with one instance of inappropriate higher antibiotic use. Regarding prophylaxis duration, only 27% adhered to the appropriate timeline, with 40% exceeding 48 hours, indicating extended use. Upon discharge, a notable proportion (45 patients) received antibiotic prescriptions. Among them, 73% were prescribed rationally, while 27% exhibited irrational antibiotic use. Conclusion The findings of this study shed a significant light on the issue of antibiotic misuse within the context of paediatric cardiac surgery. It underscores the pressing need for more stringent measures to regulate and address this concerning trend. The study underscores the pivotal importance of adhering rigorously to established protocols and guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis. This adherence not only holds the potential to elevate the overall quality of patient care but also plays a critical role in combating the escalating challenge of antibiotic resistance. Through a concerted effort to optimize antibiotic usage, we can simultaneously enhance patient outcomes and contribute to the ongoing fight against the emergence of antibiotic-resistant strains, thus preserving the efficacy of these vital medications for future generations.

Prophylactic antibiotics for preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia: a pairwise and Bayesian network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The role of prophylactic antibiotics in preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) remains unclear. This network meta-analysis compared the efficacy and safety of antibiotic prophylaxis in preventing VAP in an IMV population in intensive-care units (ICUs). METHODS: We searched the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to December 2021, to identify relevant studies assessing the impact of prophylactic antibiotics on the incidence of VAP, the mortality, and the duration of ICU stays and hospitalization to perform a meta-analysis. RESULTS: Thirteen studies (2144 patients) were included, 12 of which were selected for the primary analysis, which revealed that treatment with prophylactic antibiotics resulted in a lower VAP rate compared with control groups [risk ratio (RR) = 0.62]. Bayesian network meta-analysis indicated that aerosolized tobramycin and intravenous ampicillin-sulbactam presented the greatest likelihood being the most efficient regimen for reducing VAP. CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic prophylaxis may reduce the incidence of VAP, but not the mortality, for adult patients undergoing IMV in ICUs. Tobramycin via nebulization and ampicillin-sulbactam via intravenous administration presented the greatest likelihood of being the most efficient regimen for preventing VAP. However, well-designed randomized studies are warranted before definite recommendations can be made.

Oral streptococcal infective endocarditis among individuals at high risk following dental treatment: a nested case-crossover and case-control study.

Background: It is not clear whether Viridans Group Streptococcal Infective Endocarditis (VGS-IE) among individuals at high risk is more frequent following bacteraemia caused by invasive dental procedures (IDPs) than after daily bacteraemia caused by chewing and tooth brushing. The aim of this nested study was to assess if VGS-IE was temporally associated with IDPs in a national cohort of individuals at high risk. Methods: This nested case-control and case-crossover study was based on a Swedish national cohort study of 76,762 individuals at high risk of IE due to complex congenital heart disease, prosthetic heart valve or previous IE. Participants were living in Sweden between July 1st, 2008 and January 1st, 2018. The frequency of IDPs during the 3 months before VGS-IE was calculated and compared to controls (sampled 1:10). A case-crossover study was conducted to account for residual confounders. Participants were identified using the national patient register, and IDPs were identified using the national dental health register. Findings: 98,247 IDPs were carried out in the cohort during the study period: 624 occasions of oral surgery, 44,190 extractions and 53,433 sessions of subgingival scaling. The study could not confirm that IDPs were more common among cases (4.6%) than controls (4.1%), OR = 1.22 [95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.64-2.3], or during case- (3.3%) than reference periods (3.8%), OR = 0.89 [95% CI: 0.68-1.17]. Restricting the analysis to the period when cessation of antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of IE in Swedish dentistry was recommended, from the 1st of October 2012 to the 1st of January 2018, did not alter the results of the case-control study: OR 0.64, 95% CI: 0.20-2.09, or the case-crossover study: OR 0.58, 95% CI: 0.15-2.19. Interpretation: The study could not confirm that VGS-IE is associated with IDPs among individuals at high risk. A study with larger sample size could clarify whether there is a lack of association. The finding of a small (<5%) proportion of cases temporally associated with IDPs is similar to that of the previous large-scale study on IDPs and VGS-IE. Funding: Funding was provided by the Board of doctoral education at Karolinska Institutet, the Public Health Agency of Sweden, Folktandvården Stockholm AB, Steering Group for Collaborative Odontological Research at Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm City County, and the Swedish Dental Association.

Urinary tract infections after retrograde pyelography and prophylactic antibiotics.

INTRODUCTION: Retrograde pyelography (RP) is performed for examination of upper urinary tract cancers and hydronephrosis. Although urinary tract infections (UTI) are known to be complicated by the examination, there are few reports on the frequency of occurrence and prophylactic antibiotics. METHODS: The incidence of UTI and febrile UTI (f-UTI) and patient background information were compared in 388 patients who underwent RP at our hospital from January 2018 to December 2022. We also examined the administration of pre-RP antibiotics. RESULTS: Of the 388 patients who underwent RP, 27 (6.9%) had UTI and 17 (4.4%) had f-UTI. Of the 27 UTI cases, 25 (92.6%) were pyelonephritis; 20 (74.0%) were hospitalized and 2 (7.4%) presented with septic shock and were managed in the intensive care unit. When comparing the background of patients with UTI, no significant differences were found in the present study, but when limited to the 17 cases of f-UTI, the presence of hydronephrosis before RP and not prescribing antibiotics before RP were associated with significantly higher incidence of f-UTI (p = 0.019, p = 0.036, respectively). Especially for patients without pyuria and bacteriuria before RP, prescribing antibiotics before RP resulted in 0 cases of f-UTI (p = 0.020). CONCLUSION: This retrospective study showed that the presence of hydronephrosis before RP and not prescribing prophylactic antibiotics before RP are risk factors for f-UTI.

Prophylactic antibiotics has no benefit for outcome in clean myringoplasty-A register-based cohort study from SwedEar.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate if prophylactic antibiotics (PA) in conjunction with myringoplasty of clean and uninfected ears entails a reduction of postoperative infections within 6 weeks after surgery, and whether it affects the healing rate of the tympanic membrane (TM) at follow-up, 6-24 months after surgery. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data. SETTING: Data extracted from The Swedish Quality Register for Ear Surgery (SwedEar), the years 2013-2019. PARTICIPANTS: All patients in SwedEar with a registered clean conventional myringoplasty (tympanoplasty type I) including a follow-up visit. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The effect of PA use on TM healing rate at follow-up and postoperative infection within 6 weeks of surgery. RESULTS: In the study group (n = 1665) 86.2% had a healed TM at follow-up. There was no significant difference between the groups that had PA administered (87.2%) or not (86.1%). A total of 8.0% had a postoperative infection within 6 weeks. Postoperative infection occurred in 10.2% of the group that received PA (n = 187) compared with 7.7% of the group that did not receive PA. However, this difference was not statistically significant. Postoperative infection within 6 weeks significantly lowered the frequency of healed TMs. CONCLUSION: PA administered during clean conventional myringoplasty does not improve the chance of having a healed TM at follow up, nor decrease the risk of having a postoperative infection within 6 weeks after surgery.

In-feed nutritional additive probiotic Saccharomyces boulardii RC009 can substitute for prophylactic antibiotics and improve the production and health of weaning pigs.

Background and Aims: Non-therapeutic antibiotic use is associated with the current decrease in antibiotic therapeutic efficiency and the emergence of a wide range of resistant strains, which constitutes a public health risk. This study aimed to evaluate the use of Saccharomyces cerevisiae var. boulardii RC009 as a nutritional feed additive to substitute the prophylactic use of antibiotics and improve the productive performance and health of post-weaning piglets. Materials and Methods: Four regular nutritional phases were prepared. Post-weaning pigs (21-70 days old) received one of two dietary treatments: T1-basal diet (BD-control group) with in-feed antibiotics as a prophylactic medication (one pulse of Tiamulin in P3 and one pulse of Amoxicillin in P4); and T2-BD without in-feed antibiotics but with Saccharomyces boulardii RC009 (1 × 1012 colony forming unit/T feed). The feed conversion ratio (FCR), total weight gain (TWG-kg), and daily weight gain (DWG-kg) were determined. A post-weaning growth index (GI) was calculated and animals (160 days old) from each treatment were analyzed at the abattoir after sacrifice for carcass weight and respiratory tract lesions. Results: Pigs consuming probiotics had higher TWG and DWG than the control group. The group of animals with low body weight obtained the same results. Saccharomyces boulardii administration decreased diarrhea, and FCR reduction was related to a GI improvement. A significant increase in carcass weight and muscle thickness reduction was observed in animals received the probiotic post-weaning. Conclusion: Saccharomyces boulardii RC009, a probiotic additive, was found to improve the production parameters of pigs post-weaning and enhance their health status, indicating that it may be a promising alternative to prophylactic antibiotics.

The five-year trends in antibiotic prescription by dentists and antibiotic prophylaxis for tooth extraction: a region-wide claims study in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial stewardship in dentistry and antibiotic prophylaxis for tooth extraction have been areas of concern in Japan, with limited research available. METHODS: This cross-sectional study utilized the regional health insurance claims database in Japan to examine antibiotic prescription trends by dentists, including antibiotic regimens, timing of prescription, and days of supply for prophylactic antibiotic use during tooth extraction. Antibiotic prophylaxis for patients with prosthetic heart valves was also investigated. FINDINGS: Antibiotic prescriptions by dentists decreased by 7% in 2019 compared to those in 2015, with third-generation cephalosporins still accounting for 48.5% in 2019. Amoxicillin prescription increased 3.9 times in 2019, although it only accounted for 8.4% of all antibiotic prescriptions. In 2019, amoxicillin was prescribed for 17.1% of all prophylactic antibiotics associated with tooth extraction, and 80% of prophylactic antibiotics were prescribed for 3 days or more, with 85% prescribed on the day of the procedure. However, only 60-70% of patients with prosthetic heart valves received antibiotic prophylaxis. INTERPRETATION: Despite the increasing trend after the implementation of the National Action Plan on antimicrobial resistance, the proportion of amoxicillin prescriptions in dentistry remains low. Antimicrobial stewardship issues related to long-term prescription and timing of administration of prophylactic antibiotics for tooth extraction should be addressed. Dentists must recognize the risks associated with high-risk patients with prosthetic heart valves who require antibiotic prophylaxis, and physicians providing valve replacement therapy should inform patients of the requirement for prophylaxis before invasive dental procedures.

Preoperative prophylactic antibiotics administration does not influence culture yield in revision shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The importance of administrating prophylactic antibiotics prior to a surgical procedure is well established. Given the difficulty in diagnosing shoulder periprosthetic infections, which are more indolent in nature, some advocate holding prophylactic antibiotics prior to obtaining cultures as there is a concern antibiotics may lead to a false negative culture result. The purpose of this study is to determine whether administration of antibiotics prior to obtaining cultures in revision shoulder arthroplasty influences culture yield. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of revision shoulder arthroplasty cases performed at a single institution between 2015 and 2021. During the study period, each surgeon had a standardized protocol that dictated whether antibiotics were given or held prior to each revision surgery. Each case was categorized into either a Preculture antibiotic group, if antibiotics were administered prior to incision, or a Postculture antibiotic group if antibiotics were administered after incision and obtaining cultures. The International Consensus Meeting (ICM) scoring criteria provided by the Musculoskeletal Infection Society was used to categorize the probability of periprosthetic joint infection for each case. Culture positivity was calculated as the ratio of positive cultures and total number of cultures obtained. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-four patients met inclusion criteria. There were 48 patients in the Preculture group and 76 patients in the Postculture group. No significant difference in patient demographics or ICM criteria (P = .09) was observed between the 2 groups. With regard to culture positivity, there was no difference between the Preculture antibiotic group and the Postculture antibiotic group (16% vs. 15%, P = .82, confidence interval = 8%-25% vs. 10%-20%, respectively). CONCLUSION: In the setting of revision shoulder arthroplasty, timing of antibiotic administration did not significantly influence culture yield. This study supports the use of prophylactic antibiotics prior to obtaining cultures in revision shoulder arthroplasty.

CRO infection and the Use of MRSA-active Medication for Prophylaxis affect the Prognosis of Patients with Hematological Malignancies after CAR-T Infusion.

Carbapenem-resistant organisms (CRO) are a high priority issue because there are limited medications available to treat CRO infections, and these pathogens replicate rapidly in immunosuppressed patients, including those with hematological malignancy. Risk factors and prognosis of CRO infections after chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells (CAR-T) therapy are unclear. This study was conducted to analyse the risk factors for CRO infection in patients with hematological malignancies following CAR-T therapy, and prognosis 1 year after CAR-T infusion. Patients who were diagnosed with hematological malignancies and treated with CAR-T therapy between June 2018 and December 2020 at our center were included. The case group consisted of 35 patients who developed CRO infections within 1 year of CAR-T infusion, and the control group comprised 280 patients who did not develop CRO infections. Shockingly, therapy failure occurred in 62.82% of CRO patients vs. 13.21% of the control group (P=0.000). Patients with CRO colonization (odds ratio [OR]=15.48, confidence interval [CI] (6.43-37.25), P=0.000) and hypoproteinemia (OR=2.84, CI (1.20-6.73), P=0.018) were susceptible to CRO infections. CRO infections (hazard ratio [HR]=4.40, CI (2.32-8.37), P=0.000), prophylaxis with combination regimens containing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)-active agents (HR=5.42, CI (2.65-11.11), P=0.000), and bacterial infections occurring within 30 days of CAR-T infusion (HR=1.97, CI (1.08-3.59), P=0.028) were risk factors for poor outcomes within 1 year. This study shows that prophylaxis of CRO infection should be a top priority in CAR-T therapy, the serum albumin level of patients should be dynamically monitored and interventions put in place if necessary, and caution is required in prophylaxis with anti-MRSA activity agents.