Distribution of regional lymph lode metastasis in unilateral nasopharyngeal carcinoma and the suggestions for selective prophylactic irradiation with intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: To address the regional lymph node (RLN) distribution and the long-term efficacy in unilateral nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), providing elective irradiation for RLN with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). METHODS: The involvement of clinical data of 136 patients with unilateral NPC, who underwent IMRT from November 2003 to December 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. The therapeutic effect and failure pattern of RLN metastasis were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 57.1% patients have bilateral RLN metastasis. The rate of contralateral RLNs metastasis is lower than that of ipsilateral RLNs. Contralateral RLN metastasis mainly occurs in level VIIa (39.0%) and II (38.2%). While level IVa is only 0.7%, and none of RLN metastasis was found in level IVb and Va. The median follow-up was 70 months, and the 3-, 5-and 10-year regional recurrence-free survival (RRFS) were 94.1%, 93.1%, and 93.1%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Routine prophylactic irradiation may not include contralateral lower neck LN and level Va for N0-1 unilateral NPC.

Discussion on the necessity of bilateral inguinal lymphatic area irradiation for cervical cancer with invasion of the lower one-third of the vagina.

Context: According to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for cervical cancer, patients with cervical cancer invading the lower one-third of the vagina require bilateral inguinal lymphatic area preventive irradiation. However, it is not clear whether they need preventive inguinal area irradiation. Aims: The aim of this study is to evaluate the necessity of bilateral inguinal lymphatic area irradiation for patients with cervical cancer with invasion of the lower one-third of the vagina. Settings and Design: Patients without inguinal lymph node metastasis were divided into preventive radiotherapy and nonpreventive radiotherapy groups. The occurrence of inguinal skin damage, lower extremity edema, and femoral head necrosis was observed during and after treatment. Methods and Material: In total, 184 patients with cervical cancer with invasion of the lower one-third of the vagina were selected. A trial and control method was used to select 180 patients without inguinal lymph node metastasis. Statistical Analysis: Comparison between groups was performed using a t test. Data were enumerated using frequency (percentage), and comparison between groups was performed using a Chi-square test. Results: Imaging examination revealed inguinal lymph node enlargement in 7.07% of patients, and only four cases (2.17%) were further confirmed by pathology. The inguinal lymph node metastasis rate in these patients was very low. The prophylactic irradiation group showed a high occurrence rate of side injury. In the follow-up of both groups, no recurrence was detected in the inguinal lymph nodes. Conclusions: Prophylactic irradiation of inguinal lymph nodes is not essential for patients without pathological metastasis.

Contralateral risk-reducing local therapy in breast cancer patients with BRCA1/2 mutations: systemic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Unilateral breast cancer (UBC) patients with germline pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants have a higher risk of developing contralateral breast cancer (CBC) and need contralateral risk-reducing local treatments, including contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy (CRRM) and prophylactic irradiation (CPI). The aim of our study was to systematically explore the efficacy of CRRM and CPI in reducing CBC risk and increasing survival. METHODS: A search was done, and eligible randomized trials and cohort studies should include and compare UBC patients with germline pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants who have and have not received contralateral risk-reducing local treatment. Random-effects meta-analysis was used in this study. Primary outcomes of the studies included overall survival (OS) and the incidence of contralateral breast cancer (CBC), and secondary outcomes included breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS). RESULTS: A total of five studies with 1769 UBC patients with germline pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants were enrolled in our meta-analysis. CRRM was correlated with a lower risk of CBC in UBC patients with germline pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants (summary RR = 0.07; 95%CI 0.03-0.13, I2 = 3%), a significantly increased OS (summary RR, 1.15; 95%CI 1.04-1.26, I2 = 26%) and a significantly increased BCSS (summary RR, 1.18; 95%CI 1.07-1.31, I2 = 64%) compared with surveillance. CPI also decreased the risk of CBC (RR 0.02; 95%CI 0.05-0.88) but did not significantly improve OS (RR 0.97; 95%CI 0.90-1.05) and BCSS (RR 0.97; 95%CI 0.90-1.05) compared with surveillance. CONCLUSIONS: CRRM reduces CBC risk and increases OS and BCSS in UBC patients with germline pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants, and could be offered as a risk-reducing local treatment. For those who oppose CRRM, CPI could be offered for CBC-risk reduction, while its survival benefit is still uncertain.

Prophylactic irradiation of tracts in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

INTRODUCTION: The role of prophylactic irradiation of tracts (PIT) to prevent tumor seeding at the site of a diagnostic or therapeutic intervention in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is controversial. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of PITs in preventing procedure tract metastases (PTM) after a chest wall procedure in MPM. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched various databases from inception date to April 2020 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PIT with no PIT in patients who had a chest wall procedure for MPM. We assessed the risk of bias of individual RCT using the RoB2 tool. The primary outcome was the occurrence of PTM. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effects model. We employed the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of the evidence. RESULTS: We identified five RCTs including 737 patients. Two RCTs had a low risk of bias. PIT was associated with a significant reduction in the odds of PTM (odd ratio, 0.55; 95 % confidence interval, 0.32 to 0.95; P-value = 0.03; I2 = 13 %; GRADE: moderate certainty). One RCT reported no difference in overall survival outcome with the use of PIT. None of the RCTs performed subgroup analyses. Sensitivity analyses showed similar results when limited to RCTs with low risk of bias. CONCLUSION: PIT significantly reduces the occurrence of PTM in patients with MPM who had a diagnostic or therapeutic chest wall procedure.

Elective nodal irradiation with simultaneous integrated boost stereotactic body radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer: Analyses of planning feasibility and geometrically driven DVH prediction model.

PURPOSE: We evaluate the feasibility of the elective nodal irradiation strategy in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Three simultaneous integrated boost (SIB)-SBRT plans (Boost1, Boost2, and Boost3) were retrospectively generated for each of 20 different patients. Boost1 delivered 33 and 25 Gy to PTV1 and PTV2, respectively. Boost2 delivered 40, 33, and 25 Gy to boostCTV, PTV1, and PTV2, respectively. Boost3 delivered 33 and 25 Gy to PTV1 and PTV3, respectively. PTV1 covered the initial standard SBRT plan (InitPlan) gross tumor volume (GTV). PTV2 covered CTVgeom which was created by a 10-mm expansion (15 mm posterior) of GTV. PTV3 covered CTVprop which included elective nodal regions. The boostCTV included GTV as well as involved vasculature. The planning feasibility in each scenario and dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were analyzed and compared with the InitPlan (delivered 33 Gy only to PTV1) by paired t-test. Next, a novel DVH prediction model was developed and its performance was evaluated according to the prediction accuracy (AC) of planning violations. Then, the model was used to simulate the impacts of GTV-to-organs at risk (OAR) distance and gastrointestinal (GI) OAR volume variations on planning feasibility. RESULTS: Significant dose increases were observed in GI-OARs in SIB-SBRT plans when compared with InitPlan. All dose constraints were met in 63% of cases in InitPlan, Boost1, and Boost2, whereas Boost3 developed DVH violations in all cases. Utilizing previous patient anatomy, the novel DVH prediction model achieved a high AC in the prediction of violations for GI-OARs; the positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and AC were 66%, 90%, and 84%, respectively. Experiments with the model demonstrated that the larger proximity volume of GI-OAR at the shorter distance substantially impacted on planning violations. CONCLUSIONS: SIB-SBRT plan with geometrically defined prophylactic areas can be dosimetrically feasible, but including all nodal areas with 25 Gy in five fractions appears to be unrealistic.

Does postoperative prophylactic irradiation of para-aortic lymph nodes reduce the risk of recurrence in uterine cervical cancer with positive pelvic lymph nodes?

BACKGROUND: In cervical cancer, para-aortic lymph nodes are common sites of metastasis. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the clinical benefits of prophylactic irradiation as postoperative therapy. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted during 2001-2015 at a single institution. Patients with a high risk of para-aortic lymph nodes recurrence were eligible for this study, and we identified patients who had pelvic lymph node metastasis and underwent radical surgery and concurrent chemo-radiotherapy. As a result, 33 and 46 patients were included in the treatment (prophylactic irradiation) and non-treatment groups, respectively. Baseline differences between the two groups were adjusted with the inverse probability of treatment weighting using propensity scores composed of the independent variables including age, stage, tumor size, pathological findings, lymph node status, and pathological subtypes. RESULTS: In the 68-month median follow-up period (range 6-178 months), 25 patients experienced recurrence, and 17 patients were dead. After adjustment with the inverse probability of treatment weighting, the recurrence rates tended to decrease in the treatment group, but there was no significant difference between the two groups [treatment vs. non-treatment, 29.4% and 44.3%, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.593 (95% CI 0.320-1.099); P = 0.097]. However, adjusted para-aortic lymph nodes recurrence rates were not significantly different [treatment vs. non-treatment, 7.8% and 11.4%, respectively; odds ratio, 0.660 (95% CI 0.187-2.322); P = 0.558]. Moreover, Kaplan-Meier curves showing post-recurrence survival revealed no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.141). CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic para-aortic lymph nodes irradiation did not reduce the risk of recurrence.

Risk factors and distribution features of level IB lymph nodes metastasis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to investigate the risk factors and distribution features for level IB metastasis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and provide clinical evidence for defining the indications and clinical target volume (CTV) of prophylactic level IB irradiation. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 798 patients with newly-diagnosed, non-metastatic and histologically confirmed NPC underwent intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Two sides of neck in each patient have been analyzed separately. The correlations of level IB metastasis and the clinical risk factors were analyzed with Chi-square test and logistic regression model. The risk score model (RSM) of level IB metastasis was calculated by totaling up the scores of each independent variable. We divided level IB into three areas, including anterolateral space of submandibular glands, medial space of the submandibular glands and submandibular glands. RESULTS: Maximal axial diameter (MAD) of level IIA nodes >20mm or extra capsular spread (ES) of level IIA nodes, anterior half of nasal cavity involvement and submandibular gland involvement/compression were independently significantly risk factors for level IB lymph nodes (LNs) metastasis at diagnosis. Two groups based on RSM were obtained: low risk (total score=0-2.5); high risk (4-8.5). The incidence of IB LNs metastasis at diagnosis of the two groups were 0.9% and 6.3%, respectively (P<0.001). The cervical lymph nodes of level IB were distributed in the anterolateral space of submandibular glands. There was no positive/negative LNs inside or medial space of the submandibular glands. CONCLUSION: Level IB LNs metastasis is associated with MAD of level IIA nodes >20mm or ES of level IIA nodes, anterior half of nasal cavity involvement and submandibular gland involvement/compression in NPC patients. Omission of level IB irradiation may be feasible for patients with low-risk IB LNs metastasis at diagnosis. The submandibular gland should not be included in level IB.

Research status of prophylactic irradiation to para-aortic lymph nodes in cervical cancer / 中华放射肿瘤学杂志

The recurrence rate of para-aortic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer undergoing concurrent pelvic chemoradiotherapy is approximately 10％,which seriously affects the prognosis of patients with cervical cancer.Some researchers suggest that high-risk patients with locally advanced cervical cancer undergo prophylactic irradiation to the para-aortic lymph nodes based on pelvic chemoradiotherapy.In this article,the clinical efficacy,the applicable population,the upper margin of the target volume,the preventive dose and the side effects of prophylactic irradiation to the para-aortic lymphatic nodes were analyzed.

Role of prophylactic supraclavicular irradiation in high-risk patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer / 中国肿瘤临床

Objective: To investigate the clinical benefits of prophylactic supraclavicular irradiation (PSCI) in high-risk patients with limit-ed-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC). Methods: LS-SCLC patients without supraclavicular lymph node (SCLN) involvement and treat-ed with concurrent chemoradiation in the Department of Radiotherapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, be-tween July 2006 and July 2011, were retrospectively analyzed. According to our previous study, some were defined as SCLN recurrence high-risk patients. The recurrence rates of SCLN involvement and cancer-specific overall survival (CSS) in the different cohorts were ob-served. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed both in the whole cohort and high-risk patients with recurrent SCLN in-volvement. Results: One-hundred and one patients with a median age of 57 years were included. As many as 50% of the high-risk pa-tients had recurrent SCLN involvement at the last follow-up as compared to 13.6% of the low-risk patients. The patients with recurrent SCLN involvement had a dramatically lower five-year CSS than those without recurrent SCLN involvement. The five-year CSS of high-risk patients with PSCI was similar to that of the low-risk patients; however, it was significantly higher than the five-year CSS of the high-risk patients without PSCI. The multivariate analysis revealed that advanced stage and recurrent SCLN involvement were signifi-cantly associated with poor CSS in the overall cohort. In the high-risk patients with recurrent SCLN involvement alone, only PSCI was as-sociated with improved CSS. Conclusions: PSCI not only reduced the recurrence of SCLN involvement significantly but also improved CSS in high-risk patients with LS-SCLC.

Feasibility of ipsilateral lower neck sparing irradiation for unilateral or bilateral neck node-negative nasopharyngeal carcinoma: systemic review and meta-analysis of 2, 521 patients.

BACKGROUND: To compare the efficacy of ipsilateral lower neck sparing irradiation (ILNSI) versus ipsilateral lower neck prophylactic irradiation (ILNPI) for unilateral or bilateral neck node-negative nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC). METHODS: A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and other public databases was conducted in October, 2017. The outcomes were 3-year overall/regional recurrence-free/disease-free/distant metastasis-free survival (OS/RRFS/DFS/DMFS) and ipsilateral lower neck (ILN) recurrence. We performed subgroup analysis of ILNSI versus ILNPI for different radiotherapy techniques. Sensitivity analysis was performed to examine the stability of the results. RESULTS: Nine head-to-head comparative studies (2, 521 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. For the comparison of ILNSI versus ILNPI, there was no significant difference in 3-year OS (HR = 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.85-1.58, P = 0.36), RRFS (HR = 1.37, 95% CI = 0.76-2.47, P = 0.30), DFS (HR = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.80-1.44, P = 0.62) and DMFS (HR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.69-1.44, P = 0.99). ILNSI and ILNPI also led to equivalent ILN recurrence rates (OR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.47-2.03, P = 0.96). No significant heterogeneity was observed for any outcome. Subgroup analysis confirmed no significant differences between ILNSI and ILNPI for any outcome, regardless of radiotherapy technique. Sensitivity analysis indicated all outcomes were highly stable in favor of the original conclusions. CONCLUSIONS: ILNSI provided equivalent survival outcomes and regional control compared to ILNPI; ILNSI represents an appropriate alternative strategy for patients with unilateral or bilateral neck node-negative NPC.

The feasibility of contralateral lower neck sparing intensity modulation radiated therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with unilateral cervical lymph node involvement.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the feasibility of contralateral lower neck sparing intensity modulation radiated therapy (IMRT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients (NPC) with unilateral cervical lymph node metastasis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of 546 patients with unilateral cervical lymph node metastasis treated between November 2009 and February 2012 at one institution. All patients were staged using magnetic resonance imaging and received radical IMRT. Patients were classified into two groups: the inferior border of the negative neck irradiation field only covered Levels III to Va in Group 1; the inferior border covered entire neck down to Levels IV to Vb in Group 2. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 49.9months (range, 1.3-69.2months). Four-year overall survival (OS:89.3% vs. 88.9%, P=0.91), disease-free survival (DFS:81.7% vs. 81.0%, P=0.91), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS:88.2% vs. 87.9%, P=0.95), local relapse-free survival (LRFS:96.7% vs. 94.7%, P=0.70) and nodal relapse-free survival (NRFS: 96.1% vs. 95.9%, P=0.94) were not significantly different between Group 1 and Group 2. Twenty-two patients developed cervical lymph node relapse; of whom 20/22 (91.0%) developed unilateral relapse within pretreatment positive neck. Only one patient developed out-of-field relapse, though this patient also relapsed within the neck irradiation field (Level II). No clinicopathological feature tested had significant prognostic value for NRFS in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In the IMRT and MRI era, contralateral lower neck sparing IMRT seems to be feasible for NPC patients with unilateral cervical lymph node metastasis.

Patterns of failure and clinical outcomes of definitive radiotherapy for cervical esophageal cancer.

PURPOSE: Because of the scarcity of cervical esophageal cancer (CEC), data for this disease entity is limited. We aim to evaluate the outcomes, prognostic factors and failure patterns of CEC treated by contemporary radiotherapy (RT). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 86 CEC patients consecutively treated between 2007 and 2015 by definitive RT with or without concurrent chemotherapy. RT was mainly delivered with Intensity Modulated Irradiation Therapy (IMRT) or Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT). Statistical analyses were performed on survival, prognostic factors and failure patterns. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 19.4 months. The 3-year overall survival (OS), local regional failure free survival (LRFFS), distant metastatic free survival (DMFS), and progression free survival (PFS) were 53.6%, 57.9%, 81.5% and 41.5%, respectively. Independent predictors for poorer OS were N stage, hoarseness and recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph node (RLN) involvement, and predictors for LRFFS were N stage and EQD2 (equivalent dose in 2 Gy fraction) to gross tumor volume (GTV), with ≥ 66Gy achieving local control of 94.7%. Patients receiving elective nodal irradiation (ENI) had better nodal regional control than those receiving involved field irradiation (IFI). 31 (36%) patients had treatment failure and 15 (17.4%), 8 (9.3%) and 14 (16.2%) patients had local, regional, and distant failure, respectively. 86.7% (13/15) local failures were within GTV, and supraclavicular region (62.5%, 5/8) was the most common regional failure site. No severe toxicities were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our results seem to indicate that good locoregional control might be achieved for CEC with adequate radiation dose and treatment planning approaches.

Target volume delineation for radical radiotherapy of early oesophageal carcinoma in elderly patients.

PURPOSE: To compare the prognosis of elderly patients with early oesophageal carcinoma between radical elective nodal prophylactic irradiation and involved-field irradiation and to estimate the failure modes and adverse effects, then to provide the patients the safe and individual therapeutic regimens. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The charts of 96 patients aged 65 and over with early stage oesophageal carcinoma receiving radical radiotherapy in our department were retrospectively analysed. Of all the patients, 49 received elective nodal prophylactic irradiation and the other 47 received involved-field irradiation. After completion of the whole treatment, we analysed short-term effects, tumour local control, overall survival of the patients, failure modes and adverse effects. RESULTS: The 1-, 3-, and 5-year local control rate in elective nodal irradiation and involved-field irradiation groups were 80.6%, 57.4%, 54.0% and 65.4%, 46.5%, 30.5% respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=4.478, P=0.03). The differences of overall survival and progression-free survival were not significant (P>0.05). The difference of 1-, 3-, and 5-years local regional failure rate was statistically significant between elective nodal prophylactic irradiation and involved-field irradiation groups, except for the overall failure and distant metastasis rates. The overall incidence of radiation-induced oesophagitis after elective nodal irradiation or involved-field irradiation was 79.6% and 59.6%, and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=4.559, P=0.03). The difference of radiation pneumonitis between elective nodal prophylactic irradiation and involved-field irradiation was not significant (12.2% vs 14.9%; χ2=0.144, P=0.7). CONCLUSION: For elderly patients with early stage oesophageal carcinoma receiving radical radiotherapy, although elective nodal prophylactic irradiation could increase the incidence of radiation-induced oesophagitis, patients could tolerate the treatment and benefit from local control.

Patterns of failure in head-and-neck cancer of unknown primary:a study of 92 patientshead-and-neck cancer of unknown primary / 中华放射肿瘤学杂志

Objective To retrospectively analyze the treatment outcomes and failure patterns in patients with head?and?neck cancer of unknown primary head?and?neck cancer of unknown primary, and to compare the efficacy between elective mucosal irradiation and ipsilateral neck treatment. Methods The clinical data of patients with head?and?neck cancer of unknown primary who were admitted from January 2007 to December 2013 were retrospectively collected. Thirty?one patients received elective pharyngeal mucosal irradiation and 61 patients only received ipsilateral neck treatment. The SPSS 19. 0 software was used for comparison of the survival and local control between the two groups. Results In the 92 patients, the median age was 57 years;79. 3% had metastasis to level Ⅱ lymph nodes;the median follow?up time was 36. 5 months;the 3?year overall survival, mucosal control, and neck control rates were 89. 0%, 86. 6%, and 82. 4%, respectively. Primary sites were found in 15 patients, containing nasopharynx in 4 patients, oropharynx in 3 patients, oral cavity in 3 patients, throat and hypopharyngeal part in 3 patients, maxillary sinus in 1 patient, and esophagus in 1 patient. The patients undergoing elective pharyngeal mucosal irradiation had significantly higher 3?year mucosal control and neck control rates than those undergoing ipsilateral neck treatment ( 100% vs. 74. 9%, P= 0. 040;87. 5% vs. 62. 2%, P= 0. 037 ) . There was no difference in the 3?year overall survival rate between the two groups ( 83. 5% vs. 88. 7%, P= 0. 910 ) . Conclusions For patients with head?and?neck cancer of unknown primary, elective pharyngeal mucosal irradiation can reduce the incidence of primary site and increase the neck control rate. A new standard for target volume delineation should be established as soon as possible for elective prophylactic pharyngeal mucosal irradiation.

Total Hip Arthroplasty for Patients Who Have Ankylosing Spondylitis: Is Postoperative Irradiation Required for Prophylaxis of Heterotopic Ossification?

Postoperative radiation for prevention of heterotopic ossification (HO) has been proven effective for the patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) after total hip arthroplasties (THA). This study aims to evaluate the effect of postoperative radiation in HO formation following THA in patients with AS. We retrospectively reviewed 129 hips from 91 patients with AS receiving primary THA from July 2004 to December 2012. There were total 38 patients (53 hips) did not receive postoperative prophylaxis in Group I. Moreover, 53 patients (76 hips) received postoperative single-fraction radiotherapy of 500 cGy in Group II. After a minimum 12-month follow-up, there was no significant difference in HO formation between the two groups (P=0.210). This study suggests that postoperative radiation may not be necessary in Asian patients.

A comparative study of different irradiation ranges in radical radiotherapy for early-stage esophageal cancer / 中华放射肿瘤学杂志

Objective To compare the efficacy of elective nodal prophylactic irradiation ( ENI) and involved?field irradiation ( IFI) in radical radiotherapy for early?stage esophageal cancer and to determine the appropriate irradiation range for early?stage esophageal cancer. Methods The clinical data of 121 patients with early?stage esophageal cancer receiving radical radiotherapy in our hospital from January 2006 to December 2011 were collected and respectively analyzed. Sixty?one patients received ENI, and the other 60 patients received IFI. The Kaplan?Meier method was used to calculate local control ( LC) and overall survival ( OS) rates;the log?rank test was used for survival difference analysis and univariate prognostic analysis;the Cox regression model was used for multivariate prognostic analysis. Results The 1?, 3?, and 5?year LC rates in ENI group and IFI group were 81. 1%, 60. 1%, and 57. 5% vs. 64. 5%, 43. 9%, and 27. 2%, respectively ( P=0. 003 ) . The 1?, 3?, and 5?year OS rates in ENI group and IFI group were 86. 9%, 56. 8%, and 34. 8% vs. 86. 7%, 34. 3%, and 19. 1%, respectively ( P=0. 019) . The 1?, 3?,and 5?year overall failure rates in ENI group and IFI group were 22. 3%, 53. 8%, and 63. 2% vs. 43. 3%, 65. 8%, and 78. 8%, respectively ( P=0. 023) . Multivariate analysis showed that irradiation range was the influencing factor for LC and OS. Conclusions As for the radical radiotherapy for early?stage esophageal cancer, ENI can significantly increase LC and reduce locoregional failure, and therefore improve long?term OS.

Study of level Ⅰb delineation, dose analysis and regional recurrence in level Ⅰb lymph node-negative nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated by intensity-modulated radiotherapy / 肿瘤研究与临床

Objective To investigate the level Ⅰb contouring,dose analysis and regional recurrence in level Ⅰb lymph node-negative (Ⅰb-negative) nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients treated by intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).Methods One hundred ninety newly-diagnosed,Ⅰb-negative NPC patients treated by IMRT were enrolled.Level Ⅰb contouring and dose prescribing in this cohort were classified into planned prophylactic irradiation (PPI) group (56 cases) and non-planned prophylactic irradiation (non-PPI) group (134 cases).The mean dose (Dmean) of the level Ⅰb bilaterally and submandibular glands (SMGs) was recorded for comparison.Results After a median follow-up of 47 months,there was no level Ⅰb regional recurrences noted in the entire group.The mean doses of level Ⅰb and the submandibular glands were significantly lower in the non-PPI group than those in the PPI group as follows:(50.81±5.37) Gy vs (59.68±3.32) Gy for the left level Ⅰb,(51.55±5.02) Gy vs (59.66±3.85) Gy for the left submandibular gland,(51.55±5.02) Gy vs (59.66±3.85) Gy for the right level Ⅰb and (57.25±4.69) Gy vs (63.41±2.88) Gy for the right submandibular gland (all P =0.000).Conclusion In this retrospective analysis of non-randomized single institute data,it seems unlikely that PPI to level Ⅰb is necessary in Ⅰb-negative NPC patients treated by IMRT.

A comparative study of failure patterns of definitive treatment of esophageal cancer with elective nodal irradiation and involved-field irradiation / 中华放射肿瘤学杂志

Objective To compare the failure pattern between esophageal cancer patients receiving definitive elective nodal irradiation (ENI) and involved-field irradiation (IFI) and to investigate the reasons and influential factors for locoregional recurrence and metastasis.Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 245 patients with esophageal cancer who received definitive radiotherapy in our hospital from January 2006 to December 2012.One hundred and twenty-six patients received ENI,and the other 119 patients received IFI.Failure patterns were analyzed after treatment.Locoregional failures included local esophageal lesion uncontrol or recurrence and regional lymph node recurrence or metastasis.Distant metastases included distant organ metastasis and distant lymph node metastasis.Comparison of failure pattern between the two therapies was made by chi-square test.Results One hundred and sixty-three patients had failure after treatment.Locoregional failure was observed in 92 patients,distant metastasis in 36 patients,and locoregional failure plus distant metastasis in 35 patients.The 1-,3-,and 5-year overall failure rate for the ENI group were 35.4％,62.5％,and 69.0％,respectively,versus 46.5％,71.5％,and 81.5％ for the IFI group (P =0.036).The 1-,3-,and 5-year locoregional failure rates for the ENI group were 29.9％,48.4％,and 50.0％,respectively,versus 39.6％,62.1％,and 71.4％ for the IFI group (P =0.003).Conclusions For esophageal cancer patients receiving definitive radiotherapy,ENI can significantly reduce locoregional failures and increase locoregional control,thus improving the long-term survival.

The concurrent control study of elective nodal prophylactic irradiation with intensity modulated radiotherapy for esophageal carcinoma / 中华放射医学与防护杂志

Objective To explore the value of elective nodal prophylactic irradiation with intensity modulated radiotherapy(IMRT) for esophageal carcinoma.Screening patients who are suitable for elective nodal prophylactic irradiation (ENI),in order to improve locoregional control and overall survival.Methods The concurrent control study was conducted to esophageal cancer patients who were treated by definitive radiotherapy.A total of 148 patients finished treatment were identified.Seventy-four patients received ENI,while the other seventy-four patients received involved-field irradiation (IFI).Kaplan-Meier method was used for calculation of locoregional control rates and overall survival rates.The univariate and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors were also tested.Results The 1-,3-,and 5-year locoregional control rates of ENI group and IFI group were 72.5％,52.8％,50.6％ and 58.4％,35.8％,21.9％ (x2 =7.881,P ＜0.05),respectively.The 1,3,and 5 years survival rates of the ENI group and IFI group were 74.3％,44.2％,24.5％ and 68.9％,27.6％,15.9％ (x2 =1.903,P ＜ 0.05),respectively.In Cox multivariate analysis,clinical T stage,tumor location,different radiotherapy region were independent factors for the locoregional control of all patients,and clinical T,N stage,the length of esophageal barium meal and chemotherapy were independent factors for the overall survival of all patients.Conclusions Esophageal carcinoma patients treated with ENI could achieve better locoregional control than those treated with IFI.Esophageal carcinoma patients with early stage or middle thoracic lesion could benefit from ENI for local control and overall survival.

Volume of prophylactic irradiation to neck for stage N0 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy / 中华放射肿瘤学杂志

Objective To investigate the volume of prophylactic irradiation to the neck for stage N0 nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).Methods Retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical records of 270 patients with stage N0 NPC (based on the 6th version of AJCC/UICC staging system),who underwent IMRT as the initial treatment in our center from 2003 to 2008.Among all the patients,171 received prophylactic upper-neck irradiation,and 99 prophylactic whole-neck irradiation.All of them received 6-MV X-ray IMRT to the primary focus of NPC and the lymphatic drainage area in the upper neck (Levels Ⅱ,Ⅲ,and Ⅴ A lymph nodes) at doses of 68 Gy/30fractions and 54 Gy/30 fractions over 6 weeks.In addition,the patients receiving prophylactic whole-neck irradiation had the lower neck and supraclavicular fossae treated by anterior neck semi-field conventional technique at a dose of 50 Gy/25 fractions.Results The median follow-up was 65.1 months (range 4-106months),and the follow-up rate was 93％.The patients undergoing prophylactic upper-neck irradiation and prophylactic whole-neck irradiation had 5-year disease specific survival rates of 95.3％ and 91.9％ (x2 =0.76,P =0.384),relapse-free survival rates of 99.4％ and 99.0％ (x2 =1.18,P =0.278),and distant metastasis-free survival rates of 98.8％ and 94.9％ (x2 =2.31,P =0.128).The 5-year distant metastasisfree survival rate was significantly higher in patients without retropharyngeal lymph node (RLN) metastasis than in those with RLN metastasis (99.4％ vs.93.7％,x2 =8.96,P =0.003).Grade 1-2 mucositis and pharyngitis were the most common acute adverse reactions in patients.At 24 months after IMRT,no grade 3 or 4 xerostomia and trismus were developed.Conclusions Prophylactic irradiation to the upper neck may be feasible for stage N0 NPC patients treated with IMRT.It is reasonable in the 7th version of AJCC/UICC staging system that NPC with negative cervical lymph nodes and positive RLNs is reclassified to stage N1.