Prostate volume: does it predict patient outcomes following prostate artery embolisation? A retrospective cohort study.

Prostate artery embolisation (PAE) is a minimally invasive procedure commonly performed to treat lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) is a validated patient questionnaire quantifying LUTS and is used for patient selection for PAE, but it is largely subjective. Prostate volume is an easily estimated objective parameter across multiple imaging modalities. No strict threshold of prostate volume is established as a selection criterion for PAE, but it is generally accepted that prostate volume should be over 40 to 50 mL.We looked at a sample of 65 cases performed at a large teaching hospital between 2017 and 2019 with a minimum of four years follow up. Embospheres between 100 to 500 microns were injected into the prostatic arteries bilaterally (if technically feasible). A 'bullet shape' model was used to estimate prostatic volume from initial CT. N = 13 had an estimated volume < 51 mL (range 31-50 mL). IPSS before and at 3 months post-procedure were collected.80% of patients indicated a beneficial response to PAE (IPSS improvement > 5). 23% of patients required further PAE procedure or surgery. No major complications were recorded. The mean change in IPSS under 51 mL compared to over 51 mL cohort was 10.2 versus 11 (standard deviation 7.5 versus 7.3) (p = 0.44, 2 tailed Student's T-test).There was no statistically significant difference in the IPSS improvement or outcome of small volume prostates under 51 mL compared to large volume. Our results suggest that prostate volume should not be used to exclude patients for PAE.

The Impact of Prostate Volume on Prostate Cancer Detection: Comparing Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Transrectal Ultrasound in Biopsy-naïve Men.

Background and objective: This study aimed to determine the difference in prostate volume (PV) derived from transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), and to further investigate the role of TRUS prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) and mpMRI-PSAD in prostate cancer (PCa) detection in biopsy-naïve men. Methods: Patients who underwent an initial prostate biopsy within 3 mo after mpMRI between January 2016 and December 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of both TRUS-PSAD and mpMRI-PSAD for PCa detection were calculated and compared. The Pearson correlation coefficient, Bland-Altman plot, and receiver operating characteristic curve were also utilized to explore the interests of this study. Key findings and limitations: The median prostate-specific antigen level of 875 patients was 9.79 (interquartile range [IQR]: 7.09-13.50) ng/ml. The median mpMRI-PV and TRUS-PV were 41.92 (IQR: 29.29-60.73) and 41.04 (IQR: 29.24-57.27) ml, respectively, demonstrating a strong linear correlation (r = 0.831, 95% confidence interval: 0.809, 0.850; p < 0.01) and sufficient agreement. No significant difference was observed in terms of the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV between TRUS-PSAD and mpMRI-PSAD for any PCa and clinically significant PCa (csPCa) detection. The overall discriminative ability of TRUS-PSAD for detecting PCa or non-PCa, as well as csPCa and non-csPCa, was comparable with that of mpMRI-PSAD, and similar results were also observed in the subsequent analysis stratified by mpMRI-PV quartiles, prostate-specific antigen level, and age. The limitations include the retrospective and single-center nature and a lack of follow-up information. Conclusions and clinical implications: TRUS-PV and MRI-PV exhibited a strong linear correlation and reached sufficient agreement. The efficiency of TRUS-PSAD and mpMRI-PSAD for PCa detection was comparable. TRUS could be used for PV estimation and dynamic monitoring of PSAD, and TRUS-PSAD could effectively guide clinical decision-making and optimize diagnostic strategies. Patient summary: In this work, prostate volume (PV) derived from transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) exhibited a strong linear correlation with the PV derived from multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). The efficiency of TRUS prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) and mpMRI-PSAD for the detection of prostate cancer was comparable. TRUS could be used for PV estimation and TRUS-PSAD could help in clinical decision-making and optimizing diagnostic strategies.

Combination of prostate volume and apparent diffusion coefficient can stratify patients with a PI-RADS score of 3 to reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies.

BACKGROUND: Nowadays, there are many patients who undergo unnecessary prostate biopsies after receiving a prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) score of 3. Our purpose is to identify cutoff values of the prostate volume (PV) and minimum apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCmin) to stratify those patients to reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies. METHODS: Data from 224 qualified patients who received prostate biopsies from January 2019 to June 2023 were collected. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare non-normal distributed continuous variables, which were recorded as median (interquartile ranges). The correlation coefficients were calculated using Spearman's rank correlation analysis. Categorical variables are recorded by numbers (percentages) and compared by χ2 test. Both univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to determine the independent predictors. The receiver-operating characteristic curve and the area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of clinical variables. RESULTS: Out of a total of 224 patients, 36 patients (16.07%) were diagnosed with clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), whereas 72 patients (32.14%) were diagnosed with any grade prostate cancer. The result of multivariate analysis demonstrated that the PV (p < 0.001, odds ratio [OR]: 0.952, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.927-0.978) and ADCmin (p < 0.01, OR: 0.993, 95% CI: 0.989-0.998) were the independent factors for predicting csPCa. The AUC values of the PV and ADCmin were 0.779 (95% CI: 0.718-0.831) and 0.799 (95% CI: 0.740-0.849), respectively, for diagnosing csPCa. After stratifying patients by PV and ADCmin, 24 patients (47.06%) with "PV < 55 mL and ADCmin < 685 µm2/s" were diagnosed with csPCa. However, only one patient (1.25%) with PV ≥ 55 mL and ADCmin ≥ 685 µm2/s were diagnosed with csPCa. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we found the combination of PV and ADCmin can stratify patients with a PI-RADS score of 3 to reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies. These patients with "PV ≥ 55 mL and ADCmin ≥ 685 µm2/s" may safely avoid prostate biopsies.

The factors impacting on Gleason score upgrading in prostate cancer with initial low Gleason scores.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to investigate the factors contributing to the discrepancy in between biopsy Gleason score (GS) and radical prostatectomy GS in patients diagnosed with prostate cancer. METHODS: 341 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy from 2011/04 to 2020/12 were identified. 102 Patients with initial GS of six after biopsy were enrolled. Preoperative clinical variables and pathological variables were also obtained and assessed. The optimal cut-off points for significant continuous variables were identified by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS: Upgrading was observed in 63 patients and non-upgrading in 39 patients. In the multiple variables assessed, smaller prostate volume (PV) (p value = 0.0007), prostate specific antigen density (PSAD) (p value = 0.0055), positive surgical margins (p value = 0.0062) and pathological perineural invasion (p value = 0.0038) were significant predictors of GS upgrading. To further explore preclinical variables, a cut-off value for PV (≤ 38 ml, p value = 0.0017) and PSAD (≥ 0.26 ng/ml2, p value = 0.0013) were identified to be associated with GS upgrading. CONCLUSIONS: Smaller PV and elevated PSAD are associated with increased risk of GS upgrading, whereas lead-time bias is not. A cut-off value of PV < 38 ml and PSAD > 0.26 ng/ml2 were further identified to be associated with pathological GS upgrading.

An NLP Framework for the Extraction of Concept Measurements from Radiology and Pathology Notes.

Natural language processing (NLP) tools can automate the identification of cancer patients eligible for specific pathways. We developed and validated a cancer agnostic, rules-based NLP framework to extract the dimensions and measurements of several concepts from pathology and radiology reports. This framework was then efficiently and cost-effectively deployed to identify patients eligible for breast, lung, and prostate cancers clinical pathways.

The Role of Digital Rectal Examination Prostate Volume Category in the Early Detection of Prostate Cancer: Its Correlation with the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Prostate Volume.

PURPOSE: To relate the prostate volume category (PVC) assessed with digital rectal examination (DRE)-small, median, and large-and the prostate volumes (PVs) assessed with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS). To compare the clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) discrimination ability of two predictive models based on DRE-PVC and MRI-PV. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective trial of 2,090 men with prostate-specific antigen >3 ng/mL and/or PCa suspicious DRE were prospectively recruited in 10 centers from Catalonia (Spain), between 2021 and 2022, in whom DRE-PVC was assessed. Pre-biopsy MRI, and 12-core TRUS-random biopsy was always performed after 2- to 6-core TRUS-fusion targeted biopsy of prostate imaging-report and data system >3 lesions. In 370 men (17.7%) the DRE-PVC was unconclusive. Among the 1,720 men finally analyzed the csPCa (grade group >2) detection was 42.4%. RESULTS: The median (interquartile range) of TRUS and MRI-PVs of small prostates were 33 mL (19-37 mL) and 35 mL (23-30 mL), p=0.410; in median prostates they were 51 mL (38-58 mL) and 55 mL (48-63 mL) respectively, p<0.001; in large prostates 80 mL (60-100 mL) and 95 mL (75-118 mL) respectively, p<0.001. The predictive models sharing the MRI-PV and DRE-PVC showed areas under the curves of 0.832 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.813-0.851) and 0.828 (95% CI, 0.809-0.848) respectively, p=0.632, as well as similar net benefit and clinical utility. CONCLUSIONS: PVC was unconclusive in 17% of DREs. MRI-PV overestimated the TRUS-PV in median and large prostates. The predictive models based on MRI-PV and DRE-PVC showed similar efficacy to predict csPCa. PVC assessed with DRE is helpful to predict the csPCa risk before MRI.

Estimated Prostate Volume by Semiautomatic Segmentation of MRI Is More Accurately Correlated with Radical Prostatectomy Specimen Weight than the Volume Calculated by Ellipsoid Formula.

INTRODUCTION: Accurate in vivo prostate volume (PV) estimation is important for obtaining prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) and further predicting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)-estimated PV compared to both volume and weight of radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS: We identified 310 PCa patients who underwent RP following combined targeted and systematic biopsy in our institution from September 2019 to February 2021. The MRI PV was determined using a semiautomated segmentation algorithm. RP PV was calculated using the prolate ellipsoid formula (length × width × height × π/6). Formula (prostate weight = [actual weight-3.8 g]/1.05 g/mL) was applied, and the resulting volume was used in further analysis. RESULTS: The median PV from MRI, RP, and RP weight were 39 mL, 38 mL, and 44 mL, respectively. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients (ρ) were 0.841 (MRI PV vs. RP weight), 0.758 (RP PV vs. RP weight), and 0.707 (MRI PV vs. RP PV) (all p < 0.001). Decreased correlation between the MRI PV and RP PV was observed in the larger (more than 55 mL) prostate. The PSAD derived from MRI PV showed most efficient to detect csPCa in RP specimen (57.9% vs. 57.6% vs. 45.4%). CONCLUSION: MRI PV is correlated better with RP weight than calculated RP PV, especially in larger prostate. The high csPCa detection rate in final pathology suggested that PSAD derived from MRI PV can be confidently used in clinical practice.

Volume of the normal prostate gland in polish boys, aged 1-17 years: Based on transabdominal ultrasound - Prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Until now, there are no established norms for prostate size in children. Prostate volume during development has been analyzed in small study groups. In diagnostic imaging, transabdominal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging are used. AIMS: To establish prostate volume norms for individuals aged 1-17 years using transabdominal ultrasound. STUDY DESIGN: Between 2021 and 2023, transabdominal prostate ultrasound was performed on 482 Caucasian boys, aged 1-17 years, who were patients of the urology clinic. Normative data were based on results of 345 boys with normal lower urinary tract, urethral and penile structures. Patients with abnormal external genitalia, Prune Belly Syndrome, Myelomeningocele, chromosomal disorders, or prostate abnormalities found in ultrasound were excluded from the study. Patient eligibility was determined based on medical records and physical examinations. During ultrasound, height, anterior-posterior dimension, and width of prostate were assessed. Prostate volume was calculated using the ellipsoid formula VH x L(AP) x W x 0.523. Measurements were correlated with age, weight, and height. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics, statistical significance tests for means, and correlation methods. After estimating preliminary results, taking into account the development periods, patients were divided into age groups: 1-4 years (n = 70), 5-10 years (n = 124), 11-12 years (n = 43), 13-15 years (n = 65), and 16-17 years (n = 43). RESULTS: The table and nomogram shows prostate volumes based on age. Prostate size remains stable up to the age of 8. We noticed a transitional phase at the age of 8-11 years. A significant increase in volume occurs over 11 years of age. There was a statistically significant relationship between prostate size, age, height, and weight. DISCUSION: Established norms can serve as a reference for prostate analysis in patients with defects of the genitourinary system. An interesting analysis would be a prostate size assessment in relation to stage of development on Tanner scale. CONCLUSION: Transabdominal ultrasound, being a non-invasive, painless, and readily accessible examination, allows assessment of prostate size even in boys aged 1 year old. A statistically significant relationship was found between prostate size, weight, and height. Norms for prostate size in boys were established according to age.

Effect of Terazosin Hydrochloride Combined with Interventional Embolisation on Prostate Volume and Quality of Life of Elderly Patients with Prostatic Hyperplasia.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the effect of terazosin hydrochloride combined with interventional embolisation on prostate volume and quality of life (QOL) of elderly patients with prostatic hyperplasia (PH). METHODS: The clinical data of 175 elderly patients with PH admitted to Central Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University from July 2020 to July 2022 were selected for retrospective analysis. Based on different treatment regimens, 89 patients who received interventional embolisation alone were included in the control group (CG), and 86 patients undergoing interventional embolisation combined with terazosin hydrochloride were included in the study group (SG). The prostate volume, serum indicators, adverse reactions and QOL of the two groups before and after treatment were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Before treatment, no significant difference in 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) scores, serum tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was observed in both groups (p > 0.05). After treatment, the SF-36 score in the SG was 78.20 ± 6.84 points, which was significantly higher than that in the CG (72.67 ± 5.94 points). In addition, the SG had remarkably lower residual urine volume and prostate volume, higher maximum flow rate and lower TNF-α and PSA levels compared with the CG (p < 0.05). The adverse reaction rate of the SG was only 4.65%, which was significantly lower than that of the CG (14.61%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Terazosin hydrochloride combined with interventional embolisation overtly reduces the prostate volume and improves the clinical symptoms of patients with fewer side effects, which has a certain clinical application value.

Effect of Terazosin Hydrochloride Combined with Interventional Embolisation on Prostate Volume and Quality of Life of Elderly Patients with Prostatic Hyperplasia

Objective: This study aimed to explore the effect of terazosin hydrochloride combined with interventional embolisation on prostate volume and quality of life (QOL) of elderly patients with prostatic hyperplasia (PH). Methods: The clinical data of 175 elderly patients with PH admitted to Central Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University from July 2020 to July 2022 were selected for retrospective analysis. Based on different treatment regimens, 89 patients who received interventional embolisation alone were included in the control group (CG), and 86 patients undergoing interventional embolisation combined with terazosin hydrochloride were included in the study group (SG). The prostate volume, serum indicators, adverse reactions and QOL of the two groups before and after treatment were compared between the two groups. Results: Before treatment, no significant difference in 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) scores, serum tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was observed in both groups (p > 0.05). After treatment, the SF-36 score in the SG was 78.20 ± 6.84 points, which was significantly higher than that in the CG (72.67 ± 5.94 points). In addition, the SG had remarkably lower residual urine volume and prostate volume, higher maximum flow rate and lower TNF-α and PSA levels compared with the CG (p < 0.05). The adverse reaction rate of the SG was only 4.65%, which was significantly lower than that of the CG (14.61%, p < 0.05). Conclusions: Terazosin hydrochloride combined with interventional embolisation overtly reduces the prostate volume and improves the clinical symptoms of patients with fewer side effects, which has a certain clinical application value (AU)

The prognosis of patients with prostate cancer receiving permanent seed implantation stratified by prostate volume: Should we be reluctant to treat with brachytherapy because of a very small prostate (<15 cc)?

PURPOSE: We evaluated the treatment outcomes of different prostate volumes (PVs), <15 cc, 15-20 cc, and > 20 cc, in patients with prostate cancer who underwent permanent seed implantation (PI) ± external beam radiation therapy ± hormone therapy in a national Japanese prospective cohort study (J-POPS). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Of the 6721 patients in J-POPS from 2005 to 2011, 6652 were included in the analysis population. We categorized the patients into the following three PV groups: <15 cc, 15-20 cc, and > 20 cc. We evaluated the effect of PV on biochemical freedom from failure (bFFF), prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM), and all-cause mortality (ACM) using the Phoenix definition and Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 60.0 months. Patients in each PV group was 491 (7.4%), 1118 (16.8%), and 5043 (75.8%), respectively. No difference was observed in bFFF (94.7%, 96.2%, and 95.7%, p = 0.407), PCSM (99.8%, 99.7%, and 99.8%, p = 0.682), and ACM (98.2%, 96.7%, and 97.2%, p = 0.119) at 5 years for each PV group. In univariate and multivariate analyses, PV was not associated with bFFF, PCSM, ACM, or grade 2 toxicity. The percentage of positive biopsies was the single most significant predictor for all treatment outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Our results obtained by analyzing a very large Japanese prospective database showed no difference in treatment outcomes according to PV (<15 cc, 15-20 cc, and ˃20 cc). Our study confirmed that PI in small prostates (even < 15 cc) remains an effective treatment option.

Value of the newly developed pelvic dimension index/prostate volume ratio in predicting positive surgical margin in prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of pelvimetric measurements, in particular the pelvic dimension index (PDI)/prostate volume (PV) ratio (PDI/PV), in predicting positive surgical margin (PSM) in prostate cancer (PC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 127 patients who had pre-operative pelvic imaging were included in this study. Demographic and clinical data were recorded. Apical depth (AD), interspinous distance (ISD), intertuberous distance (ITD), bony femoral width (BFW), soft-tissue width (SW), symphysis angle (SA), anteroposterior diameter of the pelvic inlet (API), anteroposterior diameter of the pelvic mid-plane (APM), anteroposterior diameter of the pelvic outlet (APO), pelvic depth (PD), bony width index (BWI), soft tissue width index (SWI), pelvic cavity index (PCI), PDI and PV were measured on MRI or CT. Using PDI and PV, we developed a new parameter of "PDI to PV ratio" (PDI/PV). Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the predictive potential of variables in detection of PSM. RESULTS: The AD, PV, SA and total prostate specific antigen (PSA) were significantly higher in PSM( +), while PDI, BWI, SWI, API, PDI/PV and PD were significantly lower in PSM( +) (p < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, PDI/PV ratio and clinical stage were all significant predictor of PSM, where PDI/PV ratio was the strongest predictor, followed by clinical stage. CONCLUSION: Pelvimetric measurements indicating deep location of the prostatic apex rather than pelvic width are more effective in predicting PSM. Prediction of PSM with pelvimetric measurements, in particular PDI/PV ratio, may be helpful for surgical planning in preoperative period.

Management of a localized prostatic adenocarcinoma despite the very high rate of PSA and the large tumor mass: Does PSA level indicate the stage of prostate cancer?

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is a marker specific to the prostate gland, and it is, therefore, possible to observe an increase in PSA above 4 ng/mL in cases of benign prostatic hypertrophy and cancer. But according to studies, a very high PSA level is most likely synonymous with metastatic prostate cancer. Our rare case concerns the management of a localized prostatic adenocarcinoma despite a very high PSA level of over 3000 ng/mL, with an enormous volume of prostate without invasion or distant metastasis. A very high PSA level can probably be a sign of metastatic prostatic adenocarcinoma, but not necessarily.

The Impact of Prostate Volume on the Prostate Imaging and Reporting Data System (PI-RADS) in a Real-World Setting.

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) has emerged as a new cornerstone in the diagnostic pathway of prostate cancer. However, mpMRI is not devoid of factors influencing its detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). Amongst others, prostate volume has been demonstrated to influence the detection rates of csPCa. Particularly, increasing volume has been linked to a reduced cancer detection rate. However, information about the linkage between PI-RADS, prostate volume and detection rate is relatively sparse. Therefore, the current study aims to assess the association between prostate volume, PI-RADS score and detection rate of csP-Ca, representing daily practice and contemporary mpMRI expertise. Thus, 1039 consecutive patients with 1151 PI-RADS targets, who underwent mpMRI-guided prostate biopsy at our tertiary referral center, were included. Prior mpMRI had been assessed by a plethora of 111 radiology offices, including academic centers and private practices. mpMRI was not secondarily reviewed in house before biopsy. mpMRI-targeted biopsy was performed by a small group of a total of ten urologists, who had performed at least 100 previous biopsies. Using ROC analysis, we defined cut-off values of prostate volume for each PI-RADS score, where the detection rate drops significantly. For PI-RADS 4 lesions, we found a volume > 61.5 ccm significantly reduced the cancer detection rate (OR 0.24; 95% CI 0.16-0.38; p < 0.001). For PI-RADS 5 lesions, we found a volume > 51.5 ccm to significantly reduce the cancer detection rate (OR 0.39; 95% CI 0.25-0.62; p < 0.001). For PI-RADS 3 lesions, none of the evaluated clinical parameters had a significant impact on the detection rate of csPCa. In conclusion, we show that enlarged prostate volume represents a major limitation in the daily practice of mpMRI-targeted biopsy. This study is the first to define exact cut-off values of prostate volume to significantly impair the validity of PI-RADS assessed in a real-world setting. Therefore, the results of mpMRI-targeted biopsy should be interpreted carefully, especially in patients with prostate volumes above our defined thresholds.

Is There a Link Between Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Benign Prostate Hyperplasia/Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms: A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis.

Background: Prostatic growth has been thought to be the systemic manifestation of some metabolic derangements in recent studies. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), a hepatic manifestation of the metabolic syndrome, might be closely linked with benign prostate hyperplasia and lower urinary tract symptoms (BPH/LUTS). Several studies have been conducted regarding NAFLD and BPH/LUTS association. However, the results are yet to reach a clear conclusion. We aimed to gather these studies' results to make a more robust analysis through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: We systematically searched Pubmed-Medline, Cochrane Library, and Science Direct databases. We excluded all experimental studies, case reports, and reviews. Our search was restricted to the English language. We used standard mean difference for BPH/LUTS-related parameters. We identified the study qualities by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We conducted a publication bias analysis. Results: A total of six studies involving 7089 participants fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Our meta-analysis revealed that patients with NAFLD have larger prostate volume [0.553 (0.303-0.802), P ˂ 0.001; Q = 97.41; P-value for heterogeneity = P < 0.0001; I2 = 94.86%]. However, the summary effect size of the other parameters of BPH/LUTS (prostate-specific antigen and international prostate symptom score) computed in our meta-analysis did not yield significant results. Conclusions: The prostate size was larger in patients with NAFLD, but the meta-analysis did not reach a significant result for LUTS among the studies. These results should be tested with well-designed studies, in particular, to clarify the association of LUTS with NAFLD.

Ultrasonographic Intravesical Prostatic Protrusion in Men with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in Southwest Nigeria.

Objectives: To study the relationship between sonographically measured intravesical prostate protrusion and international prostate symptoms score (IPSS), as well as prostate volume, in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia at a single health facility. Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional observational study of one hundred men (age >40 years) diagnosed with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Their International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) was assessed using the standardised IPSS instrument. Abdominal ultrasound was done to measure the intravesical prostatic protrusion (IPP), while prostate volume was estimated transabdominally and transrectally. Correlations between parameters were quantified with Spearman's correlation test. P ≤ 0.05 was statistically significant. Results: The mean age was 62.84 ± 9.0 years (Range =42-79 years). The mean IPSS was 20.99 ± 6.42 (range of 5-30). Seventy-three percent of the men in this study had intravesical prostatic protrusion on ultrasound. The mean IPP was 13.0 ± 4.0 mm. Of the 73 men with IPP, 17 (23.3%), 29 (39.7%), and 27 (37%) had grade I, grade II and grade III IPP, respectively. The mean transabdominal prostate volume (TPVA) and transrectal prostate volume (TPVT) were 71 ± 14 ml and 69 ± 13 ml, respectively. IPP had a statistically significant positive correlation with all the other parameters. The strongest correlation (very high correlation) was with the TPVA (r=0.797, P < 0.0001), followed by a moderate correlation with the IPSS (r =0.513, P < 0.0001). TPVT, transition zone volume, transition zone index, presumed circle area ratio, and quality of life score yielded slightly weaker moderate correlation with IPP, while IPP correlated weakly with age. Conclusion: IPP correlated well with multiple clinical and sonographic parameters. It correlated better with TPVA than TPVT.

Prostate Volume Influence on Postoperative Outcomes for Patients Undergoing RARP: A Monocentric Serial Analysis of 500 Cases.

Elevated prostate volume is considered to negatively influence postoperative outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). We aim to investigate the influence of prostate volume on readmissions and complications after RARP. METHODS: A total of 500 consecutive patients who underwent RARP between April 2019 and August 2022 were included. Patients were dichotomized into two groups using a prostate volume cut-off of 50 mL (small and normal prostate (SNP) n = 314, 62.8%; large prostate n = 186, 37.2%). Demographic, baseline, and perioperative data were analyzed. The postoperative complications and readmission rates within 90 days after RARP were compared between groups. A univariate linear analysis was performed to investigate the association between prostate volume and other relevant outcomes. RESULTS: Patients with larger prostates had a higher IPSS score, and therefore, more relevant LUTS at the baseline. They had higher ASA scores (p = 0.015). They also had more catheter days (mean 6.6 days for SNP vs. 7.5 days for LP) (p = 0.041). All oncological outcomes were similar between the groups. Although statistical analysis showed no significant difference between the groups (p = 0.062), a trend for minor complications in patients with larger prostates, n = 37/186 (19.8%) for the LP group vs. n = 37/314 (11.7%) in the SNP group, was observed. Namely, acute urinary retention and secondary anastomosis insufficiency. Major complications with an SNP (4.4%) and LP (3.7%) (p = 0.708) and readmissions with an SNP (6.25%) and LP (4.2%) (p = 0.814) were infrequent and distributed equally between the groups. In univariate analysis, prostate volume could solely predict a longer console time (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: A higher prostate volume appears to have minimal influence on the perioperative course after RARP. It can prolong catheter days and increase the incidence of minor complications such as acute urinary retention. However, it might predict minor changes in operating time. Yet, prostate volume has less influence on major complications, readmissions, or oncological results.

Effect of body mass index on prostate volume and prostate-specific antigen in men over 50: A cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and prostatic-specific antigen (PSA) levels, and prostate volume (PV) in men over 50 years. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Urology Outpatient Clinic at Badr Hospital and 15th May Hospital over a period of 6 months on 300 male patients over 50 years of age. The international prostate symptom score (IPSS) was used to evaluate the severity of lower tract urinary symptoms. Patients were classified according to their BMI as underweight, normal, overweight, obese, and very obese. RESULTS: The patients' mean age was 69.01 ± 11.95 years, and their mean BMI was 23.65 ± 3.54 kg/m2. An increasing trend was observed between the studied groups in terms of PV and IPSS scores. Very obese patients were associated with a significant (p < 0.05) higher PV and IPSS, followed by obese, overweighted, normal weight, and underweighted patients. On the other hand, obese patients were associated with significantly (p = 0.005) lower PSA levels compared with individuals with normal or underweight. A significant positive correlation between BMI and PV and IPSS (r = 0.316, p < 0.001 and r = 0.36, p < 0.001), respectively. We found a significant negative correlation between BMI and PSA level (r = -0.33, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Among patients older than 50, a significant correlation between BMI and PV, PAS, and IPSS was found. Obese patients had significantly higher PV and IPSS scores, and lower PAS levels than normal weight patients. Further studies are required to investigate the relationship between obesity and LUTS and the predictors of developing BPH in elderly patients.

Comparison of prostate volume measured by transabdominal ultrasound and MRI with the radical prostatectomy specimen volume: a retrospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have compared the use of transabdominal ultrasound (TAUS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to measure prostate volume (PV). In this study, we evaluate the accuracy and reliability of PV measured by TAUS and MRI. METHODS: A total of 106 patients who underwent TAUS and MRI prior to radical prostatectomy were retrospectively analyzed. The TAUS-based and MRI-based PV were calculated using the ellipsoid formula. The specimen volume measured by the water-displacement method was used as a reference standard. Correlation analysis and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were performed to compare different measurement methods and Bland Altman plots were drawn to assess the agreement. RESULTS: There was a high degree of correlation and agreement between the specimen volume and PV measured with TAUS (r = 0.838, p < 0.01; ICC = 0.83) and MRI (r = 0.914, p < 0.01; ICC = 0.90). TAUS overestimated specimen volume by 2.4ml, but the difference was independent of specimen volume (p = 0.19). MRI underestimated specimen volume by 1.7ml, the direction and magnitude of the difference varied with specimen volume (p < 0.01). The percentage error of PV measured by TAUS and MRI was within ± 20% in 65/106(61%) and 87/106(82%), respectively. In patients with PV greater than 50 ml, MRI volume still correlated strongly with specimen volume (r = 0.837, p < 0.01), while TAUS volume showed only moderate correlation with specimen (r = 0.665, p < 0.01) or MRI volume (r = 0.678, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that PV measured by MRI and TAUS is highly correlated and reliable with the specimen volume. MRI might be a more appropriate choice for measuring the large prostate.

Expression and functional activity of myosin II in hyperplastic prostates of varying volumes.

Prostate volume (PV) differs dramatically among benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patients. Estimation of PV is important to guide the most appropriate pharmacologic or interventional treatment approach. However, the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms for the differences in PV remain unknown. We recently found that the myosin II system might participate in the etiology and development of BPH via static and dynamic factors. Our present study aims to explore the expression and functional activities of myosin II isoforms including smooth muscle (SM) myosin II (SMM II) and non-muscle myosin II (NMM II) in hyperplastic prostates with varied PV. Human hyperplastic prostates and the testosterone-induced rat BPH model were employed for this study. Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E), Masson's trichrome, immunohistochemical staining, in vitro organ bath, RT-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and Western-blotting were performed. Also, a BPH tissue microarray (TMA) was constructed to determine the correlations between myosin II isoforms with clinical parameters of BPH patients. With the increase of PV, the expression of NMMHC-A, NMMHC-C, SM-A and LC17b isoforms were increased, and the contractility of prostate smooth muscle was enhanced but force developed more slowly. Consistently, NMMHC-A, NMMHC-C, SM-A and LC17b were correlated positively with PV. Similar outcomes were also observed in the BPH rat model with different PVs. Alterations in the expression and function of myosin the II system may be involved in the pathophysiological mechanism of PV differences between BPH patients.