The effectiveness of a suicide prevention program in primary care clinics supported by community public health resources: A difference-in-differences analysis.

The importance of appropriate and intensive follow-up management for individuals identified with suicide risk through screening is highlighted. The Link between Primary Care Clinic and Public Health Resources Intervention(LinkPC-PH), a suicide prevention program in primary care clinics supported by community public health resources, was implemented at the district level in 2017. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the LinkPC-PH intervention by comparing suicide rates before(2014-2016) and after(2017-2019) implementation of the intervention using a difference-in-differences design. The LinkPC-PH comprises several dimensions of intervention including screening, risk assessment of suicidality, and referral in primary care clinics and crisis contact within 24 hours, case management, and safety planning led by public health professionals. After adjustment for district-level confounders, an intervention-implemented district had 2.87 fewer suicide deaths per 100,000 people in a population sample at post-intervention than would have been expected from the same trend in suicide rates as non-implemented intervention districts. In other words, the suicide rate in the intervention area decreased by 25% following the intervention. These results empirically substantiate suicide prevention programs in primary care clinics by community public health resources for reduced suicide rates to support effective community-based suicide prevention interventions.

The Contribution of Cultural Heritage Owned by Local Health Authorities in the Humanization of Care: The Point of View of Top Management.

After the COVID-19 pandemic, reforms in healthcare systems have the purpose to fully recover the relationship of healthcare organizations with their patients. For centuries, art was used throughout Europe in the healthcare context for its power to engage and support patients in their illnesses. This approach can be rediscovered by utilizing the cultural heritage owned by Local Health Authorities. In this context, tradition, art, innovation, and care coexist. This study aims to investigate the interest in developing projects for the humanization of care by the top management of Italian Local Health Authorities, in particular exploiting their cultural heritage. The evaluation of the proposal was conducted using semi-structured interviews with the top management of two Local Health Authorities, in which the Santa Maria Nuova hospital in Florence and the Santo Spirito in Sassia Hospital in Rome are located, as the two selected cases for this study. The interviewees welcomed the proposal to develop humanization of care projects involving the use of their cultural heritage. Moreover, they expressed their desire to invest human, economic, and structural resources in the development of these initiatives. The implementation of humanization of care projects using cultural heritage owned by Local Health Authorities is useful to apply specific policies to enhance the governance of the cultural heritage according to the health mission. On the other hand, it permits the search for additional or ad hoc resources. Finally, it is possible to humanize and improve patients' experience while increasing awareness among the health workforce and trainees.

Quality of National Disease Surveillance Reporting before and during COVID-19: A Mixed-Method Study in Indonesia.

BACKGROUND: Global COVID-19 outbreaks in early 2020 have burdened health workers, among them surveillance workers who have the responsibility to undertake routine disease surveillance activities. The aim of this study was to describe the quality of the implementation of Indonesia's Early Warning and Response Alert System (EWARS) for disease surveillance and to measure the burden of disease surveillance reporting quality before and during the COVID-19 epidemic in Indonesia. METHODS: A mixed-method approach was used. A total of 38 informants from regional health offices participated in Focus Group Discussion (FGD) and In-Depth Interview (IDI) for informants from Ministry of Health. The FGD and IDI were conducted using online video communication. Yearly completeness and timeliness of reporting of 34 provinces were collected from the application. Qualitative data were analyzed thematically, and quantitative data were analyzed descriptively. RESULTS: Major implementation gaps were found in poorly distributed human resources and regional infrastructure inequity. National reporting from 2017-2019 showed an increasing trend of completeness (55%, 64%, and 75%, respectively) and timeliness (55%, 64%, and 75%, respectively). However, the quality of the reporting dropped to 53% and 34% in 2020 concomitant with the SARS-CoV2 epidemic. CONCLUSIONS: Report completeness and timeliness are likely related to regional infrastructure inequity and the COVID-19 epidemic. It is recommended to increase report capacities with an automatic EWARS application linked systems in hospitals and laboratories.

Regional Differences and Influencing Factors of Allocation Efficiency of Rural Public Health Resources in China.

In the face of increasingly growing health demands and the impact of various public health emergencies, it is of great significance to study the regional differences in the allocation efficiency of the rural public health resources and its improvement mechanism. In this paper, the game competition relationship is included in the evaluation model, and the game cross-efficiency model is used to measure the allocation efficiency of the rural public health resources in 31 provinces of China from 2008 to 2017. Then, the Theil index model and the Gini index model are applied in exploring the regional differences in the allocation efficiency of rural public health resources and its sources. Finally, the bootstrap truncated regression model is used to analyze the influencing factors of the allocation efficiency of the rural public health resources in China. The results show that, first, the total allocation efficiency level of the rural public health resources in China from 2008 to 2017 is relatively low, and it presents a U-shaped trend, first falling and then rising. Second, the changing trend of the allocation efficiency of the rural public health resources in the eastern, central, and western regions of China is similar to that in the nationwide region, and it shows a gradient trend that "the allocation efficiency in the eastern region is high, the allocation efficiency in the western region is low, and the allocation efficiency in the Central region is at the medium level". However, the gap among the three regions is continually narrowing. Third, the calculation results of the Theil index and the Gini index show that intra-regional differences are the major source of the regional differences in the allocation efficiency of the rural public health resources in China, and the inter-regional differences demonstrate an expansion trend. Finally, the improvement of the education level and the social support level will generally improve the allocation efficiency of the rural public health resources in China and its three regions. The increased governmental financial support and urbanization level will reduce the allocation efficiency of the rural public health resources in China and its three regions. The economic development level, the living conditions and the population density are the important influencing factors of the allocation efficiency differences of the rural public health resources in the three regions. Therefore, on the basis of ensuring the increase of the total supply of the rural public health resources, more attention should be paid to the improvement of the allocation efficiency. Moreover, on the basis of continually narrowing the inter-regional differences among the eastern, central, and western regions, more attention should be paid to the intra-regional differences of the allocation efficiency of the rural public health resources among the different provinces. The various economic and social policies should be constantly optimized to jointly improve the allocation efficiency of the rural public health resources.

Analysis of equity and efficiency of public health resource allocation in China:Based on HRAD and DEA / 中国卫生政策研究

Objective:The aim of this paper is to analyze and evaluate the equity and utilization efficiency of public health resource allocation in 31 provinces and cities in China, and provides reference and basis for public health resource allocation planning. Methods:The allocation of public health resources was evaluated by cluster anal-ysis and used data envelopment analysis was to explore the efficiency of public health resource allocation. Results:The degree of aggregation of public health resources in densely populated and economically developed provinces and cities were greater than or close to 1 , and the difference with the population concentration was mostly less than 0 . The degrees of aggregation in less economically backward provinces were less than 1 , and the difference with the popula-tion concentration was mostly more than 0 . The average technical efficiency of public health resource allocation was 0. 44, and the mean of pure technical efficiency and scale efficiency were 0. 74 and 0. 64 respectively. Conclusion:The degrees of aggregation of public health resources in economically developed provinces and cities are higher, but the corresponding population is poorly distributed based on population distribution. For economically backward prov-inces and cities, the geographical availability of public health resources is poor. In addition, due to unreasonable re-source allocation structure and proportion, public health resources configuration efficiency is relatively low.