Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Lasers Med Sci ; 37(3): 1549-1557, 2022 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34420126

RESUMO

Pulpal blood supply can be measured noninvasively and objectively via laser-Doppler fluxmetry. The aim of the study was to measure and compare pulpal laser-Doppler (LD) flux values for permanent non-carious teeth and carious teeth with different degrees of caries progression. Conventional sensitivity tests were also conducted for a comparative analysis to clarify the difference between tooth sensitivity and vitality. Carious lesions were detected and assessed in 15 adult subjects using the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) criteria. Pulpal sensitivity of selected carious teeth (without previous prosthetic restoration or endodontic treatment) and suitable caries-free teeth were then tested with a cold stimulus and subsequently with a weak electric current, whereas their pulpal LD flux was recorded at a separate visit using individually designed silicone probe holders. The LD flux values for teeth with an ICDAS score 6 were significantly lower compared to the values for teeth with an ICDAS score 1 (p < 0.05). Pulpal LD flux values of teeth with active caries were significantly lower than those of teeth with solely inactive carious lesions (p < 0.05). The degree of agreement between sensitivity and vitality testing was fair within both of the pairs: cold test/LDF (κk = 0.232, p = 0.00) and electric test/LDF (κk = 0.354, p = 0.00). Pulpal LD flux measurement proved to be reliable in the pulp vitality assessment of carious and non-carious teeth and might improve the reliability of clinical decisions when used in addition to standard clinical diagnostic protocols.


Assuntos
Suscetibilidade à Cárie Dentária , Polpa Dentária , Adulto , Polpa Dentária/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Fluxometria por Laser-Doppler , Lasers , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
2.
J Endod ; 46(9): 1330-1336, 2020 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32565334

RESUMO

Non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs) are malignant neoplasms of the lymphatic system, typically occurring in the fifth through seventh decades of life. Tumors develop from abnormal lymphocyte proliferation and accumulation. Although a majority of NHLs occur in nodal regions, 40% of cases appear in extranodal sites involving the stomach, spleen, Waldeyer's ring, central nervous system, lung, skin, and bone. Extranodal NHL presents a diagnostic challenge because it may mimic endodontic disease when occurring in intraosseous and soft tissue sites. This case report presents misdiagnosis of a diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) of the anterior maxilla in a 72-year-old man with a history of Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia, where the lesion was thought to be associated with a necrotic pulp and a chronic apical abscess on tooth #7. Clinical findings of a facial sinus tract, a nonresponsive pulp, large periapical radiolucency, and history of trauma were in support of this diagnosis for tooth #7. On encountering vital pulpal tissues during cavity access of tooth #7, a cone-beam computed tomography scan and lesion biopsy were obtained. Through immunohistochemistry and histologic analysis, a diagnosis of DLBCL was made. During evaluation of lesions with suspected endodontic etiology, the clinician should consider all factors of the patient's health history, hereditary risk, and comprehensive clinical testing to attain a differential diagnosis. A nonodontogenic etiology of disease should always be considered unless ruled out otherwise. Atypical presentation or testing may prompt the need for biopsy and interspecialty assessment.


Assuntos
Linfoma não Hodgkin/diagnóstico , Maxila , Abscesso , Adulto , Idoso , Biópsia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Masculino
3.
Rev. odontol. mex ; 21(1): 34-39, ene.-mar. 2017. tab, graf
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS | ID: biblio-902716

RESUMO

Objetivos: Los autores condujeron un ensayo clínico no controlado para determinar la efectividad de la técnica infraorbitaria, para proporcionar anestesia pulpar profunda en incisivos y premolares maxilares. Material y métodos: Diecinueve adultos voluntarios recibieron 1.8 mililitros de lidocaína al 2% con epinefrina 1:80,000 con una técnica infraorbitaria intraoral. Los investigadores usaron un electric pulp tester (vitalómetro) para medir la anestesia pulpar en incisivos y premolares maxilares. Los participantes informaron sobre anestesia en tejidos blandos, y molestias durante la inyección además de que valoraron el tiempo de inicio de la anestesia y la duración de la misma. Los autores analizaron los datos usando el programa estadístico STATA 9®. Resultados: La mayoría de los sujetos tenía 21 años (30%), el sexo más común fue el sexo femenino (n = 12-60%). Los autores evaluaron con escala visual análoga (VAS), la percepción del dolor al momento de aplicar la anestesia, encontrando que el 57.9% de los pacientes (n = 11) lo catalogaron como moderado (escala de 3-6). Al evaluar el éxito anestésico, observaron un mayor número de episodios en el canino y el primer premolar (57.9%, n = 9 - IC 95%), Los autores observaron un importante número de fallas en la anestesia pulpar de incisivos centrales y laterales (100-84.2%, respectivamente). El inicio de la anestesia fue a los 12-19 minutos, siendo el canino el de mayor número de reportes con un 47.4%. La incidencia de sensación subjetiva de anestesia de los tejidos blandos en piel de párpado, ala de la nariz y piel de labio superior fue del 100%, los autores observaron que el 100% de los sujetos la calificaron como desagradable (VAS). Conclusiones: La técnica infraorbitaria produce anestesia exitosa en sólo el 57.9% de los caninos y primeros premolares maxilares; es ineficaz para anestesiar incisivos centrales y laterales, luego de ser evaluada con un riguroso test de vitalometría, se produce anestesia de tejidos blandos que es catalogada como incomoda. Los autores consideran que la utilidad de la técnica infraorbitaria en odontología es cuestionable y se deben considerar otras técnicas para los incisivos y premolares maxilares.


Objectives: The authors conducted a clinical-trial, uncontrolled study to determine infraorbital nerve block effectiveness. Material and methods: Nineteen adult volunteers received 1.8 mL of lidocaine 2% with epinephrine 1:80,000 with an intraoral, infraorbital nerve block. Researchers used an electric pulp tester to measure pulp anesthesia in maxillary incisors and premolars. Participants reported soft tissue anesthesia and discomfort during the injection procedure; anesthesia onset time and its duration were also assessed and analyzed. Authors analyzed data using STATA statistical program 9®. Results: Most of the subjects in our trial were 21 years old (30%); the number of female participants (n = 12 - 60%) was greater than that of male participants. Authors evaluated pain perception when injecting anesthesia with a visual analogue scale (VAS), finding that 57.9% of patients (n = 11) categorized the pain as moderate (in a scale of 3-6). When assessing anesthesia success, it was observed that a greater number of canine teeth and first premolars (57.9%, n = 9 - CI 95%) were anesthetized. The authors also observed a significant greater number of nonresponse (non-anesthetized) cases in central and lateral incisors (100-84.2%, respectively). Anesthesia onset was at 12 to 19 minutes, with canines exhibiting the largest number of anesthetized reports with 47.4%. There was a 100% incidence of subjective feeling of soft tissue anesthesia in lower eyelid skin, skin of the nose and skin of the upper lip. Authors noted that 100% of the subjects rated it as unpleasant (VAS). Conclusions: Infraorbital anesthesia technique achieved successful anesthesia in only 57.9% of upper canines and first premolars; it proved ineffective for anesthetizing central and lateral incisors. This was demonstrated after these teeth were evaluated using rigorous pulp vitality testing. Soft tissue anesthesia occurred and it was classified as uncomfortable. Authors consider that usefulness of infraorbital nerve block technique in dentistry was questionable.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...