Pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone therapy induces spermatogenesis in pituitary stalk interruption syndrome: A case report and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Pituitary stalk interruption syndrome (PSIS) is a rare anatomical defect of the pituitary gland falling under the spectrum of holoprosencephaly phenotypes. It is characterized by a deficiency in anterior pituitary hormones, such as growth hormone, gonadotropins, and thyroid hormones. Due to the syndrome's rarity and nonspecific manifestations, there is a lack of standardized treatment strategies. Consequently, early diagnosis through imaging and on-time intervention are crucial for improving patients' outcomes. CASE SUMMARY: A 30-year-old man presented with absent secondary sexual characteristics and azoospermia. Laboratory evaluation revealed a deficiency in gonadotropins, while thyroid function was mostly within normal ranges. Magnetic resonance imaging of the pituitary gland showed pituitary stalk agenesis, hypoplasia of the anterior pituitary, and ectopic posterior pituitary, leading to the diagnosis of PSIS. Initially, the patient underwent 6 mo of gonadotropin therapy without significant changes in hormone levels and secondary sexual characteristics. Pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone therapy was then administered, resulting in the detection of sperm in the semen analysis within 3 mo. After 6 mo, routine semen tests showed normal semen quality. The couple faced challenges in conceiving due to abstinence and underwent three cycles of artificial insemination, which was unsuccessful. They also attempted in vitro fertilization, but unfortunately, the woman experienced a miscarriage 10 wk after the embryo transfer. CONCLUSION: Early detection, accurate diagnosis, and timely treatment are crucial in improving the quality of life and fertility of PSIS patients.

Pulsatile gonadotropin releasing hormone therapy for spermatogenesis in congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism patients who had poor response to combined gonadotropin therapy.

Objective: Both pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and combined gonadotropin therapy are effective to induce spermatogenesis in men with congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (CHH). This study aimed to evaluate the effect of pulsatile GnRH therapy on spermatogenesis in male patients with CHH who had poor response to combined gonadotropin therapy. Materials and methods: Patients who had poor response to combined gonadotropin therapy ≥ 6 months were recruited and shifted to pulsatile GnRH therapy. The rate of successful spermatogenesis, the median time to achieve spermatogenesis, serum gonadotropins, testosterone, and testicular volume were used for data analysis. Results: A total of 28 CHH patients who had poor response to combined gonadotropin (HCG/HMG) therapy for 12.5 (6.0, 17.75) months were recruited and switched to pulsatile GnRH therapy for 10.0 (7.25, 16.0) months. Sperm was detected in 17/28 patients (60.7%). The mean time for the appearance of sperm in semen was 12.0 (7.5, 17.5) months. Compared to those who could not achieve spermatogenesis during pulsatile GnRH therapy, the successful group had a higher level of LH60min (4.32 vs. 1.10 IU/L, P = 0.043) and FSH60min (4.28 vs. 1.90 IU/L, P = 0.021). Testicular size increased during pulsatile GnRH therapy, compared to previous HCG/ HMG therapy (P < 0.05). Conclusion: For CHH patients with prior poor response to one year of HCG/ HMG therapy, switching to pulsatile GnRH therapy may induce spermatogenesis.

Pulsatile gonadotropin releasing hormone therapy for spermatogenesis in congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism patients who had poor response to combined gonadotropin therapy

ABSTRACT Objective: Both pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and combined gonadotropin therapy are effective to induce spermatogenesis in men with congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (CHH). This study aimed to evaluate the effect of pulsatile GnRH therapy on spermatogenesis in male patients with CHH who had poor response to combined gonadotropin therapy. Materials and methods: Patients who had poor response to combined gonadotropin therapy ≥ 6 months were recruited and shifted to pulsatile GnRH therapy. The rate of successful spermatogenesis, the median time to achieve spermatogenesis, serum gonadotropins, testosterone, and testicular volume were used for data analysis. Results: A total of 28 CHH patients who had poor response to combined gonadotropin (HCG/HMG) therapy for 12.5 (6.0, 17.75) months were recruited and switched to pulsatile GnRH therapy for 10.0 (7.25, 16.0) months. Sperm was detected in 17/28 patients (60.7%). The mean time for the appearance of sperm in semen was 12.0 (7.5, 17.5) months. Compared to those who could not achieve spermatogenesis during pulsatile GnRH therapy, the successful group had a higher level of LH60min (4.32 vs. 1.10 IU/L, P = 0.043) and FSH60min (4.28 vs. 1.90 IU/L, P = 0.021). Testicular size increased during pulsatile GnRH therapy, compared to previous HCG/HMG therapy (P < 0.05). Conclusion: For CHH patients with prior poor response to one year of HCG/HMG therapy, switching to pulsatile GnRH therapy may induce spermatogenesis.

Efficacy and safety of pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone therapy in patients with congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism: a multicentre clinical study.

BACKGROUND: Pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) therapy may restore function of the hypothalamus-pituitary-gonad axis and induce spermatogenesis in male patients with congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (CHH). The study sought to test the reliability of a newly developed Innopump® hormone pump, and to confirm the efficacy and safety of pulsatile GnRH therapy (by Innopump® hormone pump) in CHH patients. METHODS: From November 2017 to November 2018, 28 male patients with CHH were treated with pulsatile GnRH at Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, and Shandong Provincial Hospital. A prospective, self-controlled, 7-day clinical trial was conducted. The primary outcome measures were the efficacy and safety of pulsatile GnRH therapy (which was administered via the Innopump® hormone pump). The secondary outcome measures included total serum testosterone, luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) levels. RESULTS: All of the patients participated the clinical study. For 7 days, a dosage prescribed by doctors was accurately administered by the Innopump® hormone pump, and recorded by the pump. During the treatment, LH and FSH levels gradually increased to 2.66±1.74 and 5.05±3.03 IU/L, respectively. Upper respiratory tract infection in 1 patient and slight nausea in another patient were reported, which were confirmed to be unrelated to the pulsatile GnRH therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The Innopump® hormone pump was found to be reliable in drug administration, and to have an accurate alarming system. It effectively and safely treated patients with CHH. Pulsatile GnRH therapy may produce a physiological pattern of GnRH secretion, and re-establish pituitary-gonad axis function by increasing gonadotropin levels.