Successful treatment of severe calcium channel blocker poisoning, new experience with the guidance of invasive hemodynamic monitoring in a 17-year-old girl: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Calcium channel blocker poisoning is one of the most lethal cardiac drugs overdoses. Calcium and high-dose insulin infusion are the first-line therapy for symptomatic patients, and Intralipid emulsion infusion is useful for refractory cases. CASE PRESENTATION: In this report, we describe a 17-year-old Iranian girl who took 250 mg of the drug for a suicidal attempt and presented with refractory hypotension and non-cardiogenic pulmonary edema treated successfully with the guidance of invasive hemodynamic parameters. CONCLUSION: For complicated cases, in addition to supportive care and adjuvant therapy such as high-dose insulin and Intralipid, it is mandatory to utilize advanced hemodynamic monitoring to treat hypotension in severe calcium channel blocker poisoning to guide the treatment.

The Application of PiCCO-guided Fluid Resuscitation in Patients With Traumatic Shock.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the application of pulse contour cardiac output (PiCCO) in patients with traumatic shock. METHODS: Seventy-eight patients with traumatic shock were included and grouped. The control group (CG, n = 39) underwent fluid resuscitation through transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) monitoring, and the research group (RG, n = 39) received PiCCO-guided fluid resuscitation. RESULTS: The mechanical ventilation time, duration of vasoactive drug use, and duration of stay in the intensive care unit were lower in the RG compared to the CG (P < .05). At 72 h after fluid resuscitation, the mean arterial pressure and central venous pressure in the RG were higher than those in the CG (P < .05). The stroke volume variation and distensibility index of the inferior vena cava were lower at 72 h after fluid resuscitation, but the levels of extravascular lung water, global end-diastolic volume index, and intrathoracic blood volume index were higher in the RG (P < .05). The levels of endothelial 1, nitrogen monoxide, tumor necrosis factor-α, procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, and partial pressure of carbon dioxide at 72 h after fluid resuscitation in the RG were lower than those in the CG (P < .05). CONCLUSION: PiCCO-guided liquid resuscitation may help to accurately evaluate the volumetric parameters, alleviate symptoms of ischemia and hypoxia, regulate hemodynamics and blood gas analysis, reduce inflammatory reactions, improve endothelial functions, and effectively guide the usage of vascular active drugs.

Comparing Cardiac Output Measurements Using a Wearable, Wireless, Noninvasive Photoplethysmography-Based Device to Pulse Contour Cardiac Output in the General ICU: A Brief Report.

OBJECTIVES: Cardiac output (CO) measurements in the ICU are usually based on invasive techniques, which are technically complex and associated with clinical complications. This study aimed to compare CO measurements obtained from a noninvasive photoplethysmography-based device to a pulse contour cardiac output device in ICU patients. DESIGN: Observational, prospective, comparative clinical trial. SETTING: Single-center general ICU. PATIENTS: Patients admitted to the general ICU monitored using a pulse contour cardiac output device as per the decision of the attending physician. INTERVENTIONS: Parallel monitoring of CO using a photoplethysmography-based chest patch device and pulse contour cardiac output while the medical team was blinded to the values obtained by the noninvasive device. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Seven patients (69 measurements) were included in the final analysis. Mean CO were 7.3 ± 2.0 L/m and 7.0 ± 1.5 L/m for thermodilution and photoplethysmography, respectively. Bland-Altman showed that the photoplethysmography has a bias of 0.3 L/m with -1.6 and 2.2 L/m 95% limit of agreement (LOA) and a bias of 2.4% with 95% LOA between -25.7% and 30.5% when calculating the percentage of difference from thermodilution. The values obtained by thermodilution and photoplethysmography were highly correlated (r = 0.906). CONCLUSIONS: The tested chest patch device offers a high accuracy for CO compared to data obtained by the pulse contour cardiac output and the thermodilution method in ICU patients. Such devices could offer advanced monitoring capabilities in a variety of clinical settings, without the complications of invasive devices.

Fluid resuscitation based on pulse contour cardiac output monitoring is associated with improved prognosis in adult severe burn patients: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: A monitoring method is needed to further guide fluid resuscitation in severe burn injury. This study was performed to investigate the effects of pulse contour cardiac output (PCCO) monitoring on the prognosis of adult severe burns patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study enrolling patients from January 2015 to December 2020, who were divided into a control group receiving conventional monitoring and a study group receiving PCCO monitoring. The primary outcomes were 28-day mortality and total mortality, and the secondary outcomes included burn-related complications and the length of hospital stay and ICU stay. Multivariable logistic regression analysis and linear regression analysis were performed to determine the risk factors of burns-related complications and length of hospital stay in enrolled patients. RESULTS: A total of 109 patients in the control group and 82 patients in the study group were enrolled. While the area of full thickness burn was much higher in the control group than in the study group (P=0.021), no significant difference was found in other characteristics between the two groups. During fluid resuscitation, the fluid volume ratio of the study group was significantly different from that of the control group, and both in the first 24 hours and the second 24 hours, the resuscitation fluid volume ratio and colloid volume ratio was significantly higher in the control group than in the study group (all P<0.001). Eight patients died during treatment, and there were more patients experiencing AKI and ARDS in the control group than in the study group (P=0.029 and 0.016). The lengths of hospital stay and ICU stay in the study group was much shorter than in the control group (P<0.001 and 0.005). In addition, TBSA was an important risk factor for both AKI and ARDS, and the existence of inhalation injury and older age increased the incidence of ARDS. Higher TBSA, inhalation injury, and burn-related complications were related to longer hospital stay in enrolled patients. CONCLUSIONS: Fluid resuscitation according to PCCO monitoring can effectively reduce the volume of colloid and overall fluid volume and reduce the incidence of burns-related complications and shorten the length of hospital stay.

[Application of pulse contour cardiac output monitoring technology in fluid resuscitation of severe burn patients in shock period].

Objective: To investigate the application of pulse contour cardiac output (PiCCO) monitoring technology in fluid resuscitation of severe burn patients in shock period. Methods: From January 2015 to December 2019, 33 patients with severe burns who were hospitalized in Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital, meeting the inclusion criteria, were recruited into a retrospective cohort study with their clinical information collected. The patients were divided into PiCCO monitoring group with 15 cases (13 males and 2 females, aged (43±13) years) and routine monitoring group with 18 cases (14 males and 4 females, aged (39±9) years) according to the monitoring method used. After admission, all the patients were rehydrated following the rehydration formula of the Third Military Medical University for shock period. In routine monitoring group, the fluid resuscitation of patients was performed by monitoring indicators such as urine volume and blood pressure, while PiCCO monitoring was performed among patients in PiCCO monitoring group, and their fluid resuscitation was guided by the patient's condition and the hemodynamic parameters (without pursuing normal levels of the parameters) of PiCCO monitoring on the basis of normal monitoring indicators in routine monitoring group. The colloids coefficients, the electrolyte coefficients (compared with the corresponding rehydration formula value of 0.75 mL·kg(-1)·% total body surface area (TBSA)(-1) of the Third Military Medical University for shock period during the first 24 h post injury), the total rehydration coefficients, and the urine volumes during the first and second 24 h post injury, the lactic acid level, the base excess level, and the oxygenation index at admission and 24, 48 h after admission, and the mechanical ventilation time, the wound healing time, and the death ratio of patients in the two groups were recorded. The cardiac index, the global end-diastolic volume index (GEDVI), the intrathoracic blood volume index (ITBVI), the extravascular lung water index (EVLWI), and the systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) of patients in PiCCO monitoring group at post injury hour 24, 48, and 72 and the abnormal cases were recorded. Data were statistically analyzed with Fisher's exact probability test, independent-sample or one-sample t test, analysis of variance for repeated measurement, and Bonferroni correction. Results: During the first 24 h post injury, the colloids coefficients of patients in PiCCO monitoring group was (0.69±0.15) mL·kg(-1)·%TBSA(-1), which was significantly less than (0.85±0.16) mL·kg(-1)·%TBSA(-1) in routine monitoring group (t=-2.612, P<0.05). Compared with the rehydration formula value of the Third Military Medical University for shock period, only the colloids coefficient of patients in routine monitoring group during the first 24 h post injury was significantly increased (t=2.847, P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in the colloids coefficients of patients during the second 24 h post injury, or the electrolyte coefficients, the total rehydration coefficients, the urine volumes of patients during the first and the second 24 h post injury (t=0.579, -0.011, 0.417, -1.321, -0.137, 0.031, 1.348, P>0.05). The lactic acid level, the base excess level, the oxygenation index of patients at admission and 48 h after admission, and the oxygenation index of patients at 24 h after admission between the two groups were similar (t=-1.837, 0.620, 0.292, -1.792, 1.912, -0.167, 1.695, P>0.05). The levels of lactic acid and base excess of patients in PiCCO monitoring group were (4.8±1.4) and (1.2±5.5)mmol/L, respectively, which were significantly better than (7.0±1.5) and (-2.8±3.0) mmol/L in routine monitoring group at 24 h after admission (t=-3.904, 2.562, P<0.05 or P<0.01). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in the mechanical ventilation time or the wound healing time of patients (t=-0.699, -0.697, P>0.05), or the death ratio of patients (P>0.05). In PiCCO monitoring group, the GEDVI, and the ITBVI of patients were lower than the normal low values at post injury hour 24 and 48, which were in the normal range at post injury hour 72; the cardiac index of patients increased gradually and recovered to normal at post injury hour 48; the SVRI of patients increased significantly at post injury hour 24 and then gradually decreased to normal; the EVLWI average of patients at all time points post injury were less than 10 mL/kg. At post injury hour 24, most of the hemodynamic parameters of more than or equal to 8/15 patients in PiCCO monitoring group were abnormal, and the abnormal proportion decreased later. Conclusions: On the basis of traditional monitoring indicators, the use of PiCCO monitoring technology combined with the patient's condition (without pursuing normal levels of the parameters) in guiding the fluid resuscitation in severe burn patients can reduce the usage of colloid and better improve tissue perfusion, with the resuscitation effect being better than conventional monitoring.

[Effect of fluid resuscitation guided by pulse contour cardiac output monitoring technology on organ function in extremely severe burn patients].

Objective: To investigate the effect of fluid resuscitation guided by pulse contour cardiac output (PiCCO) monitoring technology on the organ function in extremely severe burn patients. Methods: From May 2015 to March 2019, 52 patients with extremely severe burn hospitalized in Tongren Hospital of Wuhan University & Wuhan Third Hospital, meeting the inclusion criteria, were recruited to conduct a prospectively randomized control study. The patients were divided into PiCCO monitoring rehydration group (25 cases, 17 males and 8 females) and traditional rehydration group (27 cases, 20 males and 7 females) according to the random number table, with the ages of (47±9) and (49±8) years respectively. After admission, all the patients were rehydrated according to the rehydration formula of the Third Military Medical University during shock stage. In traditional rehydration group, fluid resuscitation of the patients was performed by monitoring the traditional shock indicators such as urine volume and central venous pressure, while PiCCO monitoring was performed in patients in PiCCO monitoring rehydration group, and the global end-diastolic volume index combined with the other relevant indicators of PiCCO monitoring were used to guide rehydration on the basis of the monitoring indicators of traditional rehydration group. The rehydration coefficients and urine volumes per kilogram of body weight per hour during the first and second 24 h post injury were compared between the two groups, which were compared with the corresponding rehydration scheme value of the Third Military Medical University (hereinafter referred to as the scheme value) at the same time. The total rehydration volumes within post injury hour (PIH) 8 and during the first and second 24 h post injury, the urine volumes per hour during the first and second 24 h post injury, and the levels of creatinine, urea nitrogen, lactate clearance rate, procalcitonin, creatine kinase isoenzyme (CK-MB) in blood and mean arterial pressure (MAP) on post injury day (PID) 1, 2, and 3 were measured. The incidence of complications, the application case number of mechanical ventilation, and the mechanical ventilation time within PID 28 were analyzed. Data were statistically analyzed with analysis of variance for repeated measurement, t test, Bonferroni correction, Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test, and Fisher's exact probability method test. Results: During the second 24 h post injury, the rehydration coefficient of patients in traditional rehydration group was significantly higher than the scheme value (t=5.120, P<0.01). During the first and second 24 h post injury, the rehydration coefficients of patients in PiCCO monitoring rehydration group were significantly higher than the scheme values (t=3.655, 10.894, P<0.01) and those in traditional rehydration group (t=3.172, 2.363, P<0.05 or P<0.01). Within PIH 8, the total rehydration volumes of patients between the two groups were similar. During the first and second 24 h post injury, the total rehydration volumes of patients in PiCCO monitoring rehydration group were significantly higher than those in traditional rehydration group (t=4.428, 3.665, P<0.01). During the first and second 24 h post injury, the urine volumes per kilogram of body weight per hour of patients in traditional rehydration group were significantly higher than the schema values (t=4.293, 6.362, P<0.01), and the urine volumes per kilogram body weight per hour of patients in PiCCO monitoring rehydration group were significantly higher than the schema values (t=6.461, 8.234, P<0.01). The urine volumes per kilogram of body weight per hour and urine volumes per hour of patients in PiCCO monitoring rehydration group during the second 24 h post injury were significantly higher than those in traditional rehydration group (t=2.849, 3.644, P<0.05 or P<0.01). The creatinine levels of patients between the two groups on PID 1, 2, and 3 were similar. The urea nitrogen levels of patients in PiCCO monitoring rehydration group on PID 1, 2, and 3 were (6.8±1.5), (5.6±1.4), (4.4±1.4) mmol/L respectively, which were significantly lower than (8.6±1.8), (6.6±1.5), (5.5±1.4) mmol/L in traditional rehydration group (t=3.817, 2.511, 2.903, P<0.05 or P<0.01). The lactate clearance rates of patients in PiCCO monitoring rehydration group on PID 1, 2, and 3 were significantly higher than those in traditional rehydration group (t=2.516, 4.540, 3.130, P<0.05 or P<0.01). The procalcitonin levels of patients in PiCCO monitoring rehydration group on PID 2 and 3 were significantly lower than those in traditional rehydration group (Z=-2.491, -2.903, P<0.05). The CK-MB level of patients in PiCCO monitoring rehydration group on PID 3 was (35±10) U/L, which was significantly lower than (51±16) U/L in traditional rehydration group (t=4.556, P<0.01). The MAP levels of patients between the two groups on PID 1, 2, and 3 were similar. Within PID 28, the incidence of complications of patients in traditional rehydration group was significantly higher than that in PiCCO monitoring rehydration group (χ(2)=4.995, P<0.05), and the application case number of mechanical ventilation and the mechanical ventilation time of patients between the two groups were similar. Conclusions: The use of PiCCO monitoring technology to guide the early fluid resuscitation of extremely severe burn patients is beneficial for accurate determination of the fluid volume required by the patients and reduction of organ injury caused by improper rehydration.

[Research advances on the diagnosis and treatment of hydrofluoric acid inhalation injury].

Hydrofluoric acid inhalation injury is difficult to treat, despite it has low incidence. It could cause mild symptoms such as cough and sore throat, or severe symptom that may develop into life-threatening acute respiratory distress syndrome, and even rare pulmonary diseases such as reactive airway dysfunction syndrome and pulmonary alveolar proteinosis. Currently, there is no specific standard for the diagnosis and treatment of hydrofluoric acid inhalation injury. Authors summarize the incidence, injury mechanism, clinical diagnosis and treatment of hydrofluoric acid inhalation injury by searching literature at home and abroad and propose that pulse contour cardiac output monitor and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation have great application prospects in treatment of severe cases, so as to provide references for peers.

Body surface area calculation for dogs and cats using LiDCO and PICCO monitors.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac output, stroke volume, and measurement of other hemodynamic parameters can be useful in the management of critical patients. Given the broad size disparity of veterinary patients, the raw values can vary widely. Their indexed values, however, allow for quick assessment of hemodynamic status and a more standardized target setting by the veterinary care team. Monitors such as lithium dilution cardiac output (LiDCO) and pulse contour cardiac output (PICCO) can display and record the data using indexed values as long as the correct body surface area (BSA) is used. In people, the BSA is calculated using the DuBois formula by entering the patient's weight and height; however, it does not apply to animals because the equivalent relationship is not represented by this formula. Given that the hemodynamic monitors are manufactured for use in human patients, the calculations need to the adapted for veterinary use. As such, the Dubois formula has been rearranged to calculate an assumed height to be entered in the monitor software along with the patient's weight. Once the information is entered, a correct BSA will be calculated by the monitor, and indexed data will be readily available for analysis. KEY FINDINGS: Tables with the calculated heights for dogs and cats were generated. The weights and calculated heights were computed into the LiDCO and PICCO monitors for verification, and the correct BSAs were displayed as a result. SIGNIFICANCE: The information supplied here allows clinicians and researchers to quickly input patient data into the hemodynamic monitor and obtain indexed data. Indexed data facilitates advanced hemodynamic monitoring by standardizing targets (goal-directed therapy) and allowing for quicker comparison between patients. The table could be used with any monitor that utilizes the DuBois formula for BSA calculation, but the resulting BSA should be validated before proceeding with hemodynamic monitoring.

[Effects of pulse contour cardiac output monitoring technology in amelioration of myocardial damage in fluid resuscitation of patients with large area burn in the early stage].

Objective: To analyze effects of pulse contour cardiac output (PiCCO) monitoring technology in amelioration of myocardial damage in fluid resuscitation of patients with large area burn in the early stage. Methods: From November 2015 to November 2017, medical data of 52 patients with large area burn hospitalized in our unit, meeting the inclusion criteria, were analyzed retrospectively. Twenty-seven patients (18 males and 9 females) with age of (43±10)years in tradition group hospitalized from November 2015 to November 2016 were monitored by traditional monitoring methods for fluid resuscitation, and 25 patients (18 males and 7 females) with age of (44±10)years in PiCCO group hospitalized from December 2016 to November 2017 were monitored by traditional monitoring methods and PiCCO monitoring equipment for fluid resuscitation. Fluid infusion coefficients and total fluid replacement volume of patients in both groups at the first and second post burn hour (PBH) 24, as well as the levels of N terminal pro B type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), cardiac troponin T (cTnT), and creatine kinase MB (CK-MB) immediately on admission and post burn day (PBD) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 were recorded. Data were processed with analysis of variance for repeated measurement, chi-square test, t test and Bonferroni correction, and Mann-Whitney U test and Bonferroni correction. Results: (1) The fluid infusion coefficients of patients in tradition group at the first and second PBH 24 were respectively (1.42±0.10) and (0.94±0.14)mL·kg(-1)·% total body surface area (TBSA)(-1), and those in PiCCO group were respectively (1.76±0.14) and (0.85±0.08) mL·kg(-1)·%TBSA(-1). Fluid infusion coefficient and total fluid replacement volume at the first PBH 24 of patients in PiCCO group were significantly higher than those in tradition group (t=-9.775, -4.769, P<0.01). Fluid infusion coefficient at the second PBH 24 of patients in PiCCO group was significantly lower than that in tradition group (t=2.682, P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in total fluid replacement volume at the second PBH 24 in patients between the two groups (t=1.167, P>0.05). (2) Immediately on admission and PBD 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7, the levels of NT-proBNP of patients in tradition group were respectively 518 (320, 763), 236 (98, 250), 139 (62, 231), 172 (104, 185), 296 (225, 341), 727 (642, 921), 1 840 (1 357, 2 081), 1 005 (671, 1 297) pg/mL, and those in PiCCO group were respectively 444 (206, 601), 66 (29, 73), 54(28, 75), 139(101, 175), 199 (106, 279), 576 (333, 837), 833 (466, 1 080), 485 (225, 710) pg/mL. The levels of NT-proBNP of patients in PiCCO group on PBD 1, 2, 6, and 7 were significantly lower than those in tradition group (Z=-5.004, -3.967, -5.285, -4.626, P<0.01). The levels of NT-proBNP immediately on admission and PBD 3, 4, and 5 in patients between the two groups were close (Z=-0.834, -0.806, -2.665, -2.153, P>0.05). (3) Immediately on admission and PBD 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7, the levels of cTnT of patients in tradition group were respectively (42±15), (21±12), (17±7), (11±4), (12±4), (94±32), (88±23), (42±23) pg/L, and those in PiCCO group were respectively (37±15), (9±3), (10±3), (13±3), (12±5), (85±30), (60±26), (22±14) pg/L. The levels of cTnT of patients in PiCCO group on PBD 1, 2, 6, and 7 were significantly lower than those in tradition group (t=5.227, 4.751, 4.239, 3.845, P<0.01). The levels of cTnT immediately on admission and PBD 3, 4, and 5 of patients between the two groups were close (t=1.098, -1.562, -0.117, 1.107, P>0.05). (4) The levels of CK-MB of patients in PiCCO group on PBD 3, 6, and 7 were significantly lower than those in tradition group (t=3.123, 4.103, 3.178, P<0.05 or P<0.01). The levels of CK-MB immediately on admission and PBD 1, 2, 4, and 5 in patients between the two groups were close (t=0.351, 1.868, 1.100, 0.798, 2.094, P>0.05). Conclusions: PiCCO monitoring technology can monitor and guide fluid resuscitation of patients with large area burn in the early stage more scientifically and reasonably, and the effect of reducing myocardial damage is better than traditional monitoring methods.

[Clinical significance of pulse contour cardiac output monitoring technology in guiding fluid replacement during shock stage of extensive burn].

Objective: To explore the guiding significance of pulse contour cardiac output (PiCCO) monitoring technology in the treatment of fluid replacement during shock stage of extensive burn in clinic. Methods: Sixty-five patients with extensive burn hospitalized in our unit from January 2014 to December 2018, conforming to the inclusion criteria, were recruited to conduct a prospective controlled research. According to the order of admission, 35 odd-numbered patients and 30 even-numbered patients were enrolled in routine rehydration group (25 males and 10 females) and PiCCO monitoring rehydration group (21 males and 9 females) respectively, with the age of (48±9) and (44±8) years respectively. All patients of the two groups were rehydrated according to the rehydration formula of the Third Military Medical University during shock stage. The rehydration speed was adjusted in routine rehydration group according to the general indexes of shock such as central venous pressure, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, urine volume, and clinical symptoms of patients. PiCCO monitoring was performed in patients of PiCCO monitoring rehydration group, and the global end-diastolic volume index combined with the other relevant indicators of PiCCO were used to guide rehydration on the basis of the monitoring indicators of routine rehydration group. The heart rates and positive fluid balance volumes at post injury hour (PIH) 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72, the diuretic dosage at PIH 48 and 72, the total fluid replacement volumes, urine volumes, blood lactic acid, platelet count, and hematocrit at PIH 24, 48, and 72, the length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and the incidence of complications and death within 28 days after injury were compared between patients in the two groups. Data were processed with analysis of variance for repeated measurement, t test, Bonferroni correction, Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test, and Fisher's exact probability test. Results: The heart rates of patients in the two groups were similar at PIH 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, and 56 (t=0.775, 1.388, 2.511, 2.203, 1.654, 2.303, 1.808, P>0.05), and the heart rates of patients in PiCCO monitoring rehydration group at PIH 64 and 72 were obviously lower than those of routine rehydration group (t=3.229, 3.357, P<0.05 or P<0.01). The positive fluid balance volumes of patients in the two groups were similar at PIH 8, 16, 40, and 56 (t=0.768, 1.670, 2.134, 2.791, P>0.05), and the positive fluid balance volumes of patients in PiCCO monitoring rehydration group at PIH 24, 32, 48, 64, and 72 were obviously less than those of routine rehydration group (t=3.364, 4.047, 2.930, 2.950, 2.976, P<0.05 or P<0.01). The amount of diuretics used by patients in the two groups was similar at PIH 48 and 72 (Z=-0.697, -1.239, P>0.05). The total fluid replacement volumes of patients in PiCCO monitoring rehydration group at PIH 24, 48, and 72 were (13 864±4 241), (9 532±2 272), and (8 480±2 180) mL, respectively, obviously more than those in routine rehydration group [(10 388±2 445), (8 095±1 720), and (7 059±1 297) mL, respectively, t=-3.970, -2.848, -3.137, P<0.05 or P<0.01]. The urine volumes of patients in the two groups at PIH 24 were close (t=-1.027, P>0.05). The urine volumes of patients in PiCCO monitoring rehydration group at PIH 48 and 72 were (3 051±702) and (3 202±624) mL respectively, obviously more than those in routine rehydration group [(2 401±588) and (2 582±624) mL respectively, t=-4.062, -4.001, P<0.01]. The levels of blood lactate acid of patients in PiCCO monitoring rehydration group at PIH 24, 48, and 72 were obviously lower than those in routine rehydration group (t=4.758, 6.101, 3.938, P<0.01). At PIH 24 and 48, the values of the platelet count of patients in PiCCO monitoring rehydration group were obviously higher than those in routine rehydration group (t=-2.853, -2.499, P<0.05), and the values of hematocrit of patients in PiCCO monitoring rehydration group were obviously lower than those in routine rehydration group (t=2.698, 4.167, P<0.05 or P<0.01). Both the platelet count and hematocrit of patients in the two groups were similar at PIH 72 (t=-1.363, 0.476, P>0.05). The length of ICU stay of patients in PiCCO monitoring rehydration group was obviously shorter than that of routine rehydration group (t=2.184, P<0.05). Within 28 days after injury, the incidence of complications of patients in routine rehydration group was obviously higher than that in PiCCO monitoring rehydration group (P<0.05), while the mortality rate of patients in routine rehydration group was similar to that in PiCCO monitoring rehydration group (P>0.05). Conclusions: The application of PiCCO monitoring technology in monitoring fluid replacement in patients with extensive burn can quickly correct shock, reduce the occurrence of organ complications caused by improper fluid replacement, and shorten the length of ICU stay, which is of great significance in guiding the treatment of burn shock.

Effects of pulse contour cardiac output monitoring technology in amelioration of myocardial damage in fluid resuscitation of patients with large area burn in the early stage / 中华烧伤杂志

Objective@#To analyze effects of pulse contour cardiac output (PiCCO) monitoring technology in amelioration of myocardial damage in fluid resuscitation of patients with large area burn in the early stage.@*Methods@#From November 2015 to November 2017, medical data of 52 patients with large area burn hospitalized in our unit, meeting the inclusion criteria, were analyzed retrospectively. Twenty-seven patients (18 males and 9 females) with age of (43±10)years in tradition group hospitalized from November 2015 to November 2016 were monitored by traditional monitoring methods for fluid resuscitation, and 25 patients (18 males and 7 females) with age of (44±10)years in PiCCO group hospitalized from December 2016 to November 2017 were monitored by traditional monitoring methods and PiCCO monitoring equipment for fluid resuscitation. Fluid infusion coefficients and total fluid replacement volume of patients in both groups at the first and second post burn hour (PBH) 24, as well as the levels of N terminal pro B type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), cardiac troponin T (cTnT), and creatine kinase MB (CK-MB) immediately on admission and post burn day (PBD) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 were recorded. Data were processed with analysis of variance for repeated measurement, chi-square test, t test and Bonferroni correction, and Mann-Whitney U test and Bonferroni correction.@*Results@#(1) The fluid infusion coefficients of patients in tradition group at the first and second PBH 24 were respectively (1.42±0.10) and (0.94±0.14)mL·kg-1·% total body surface area (TBSA)-1, and those in PiCCO group were respectively (1.76±0.14) and (0.85±0.08) mL·kg-1·%TBSA-1. Fluid infusion coefficient and total fluid replacement volume at the first PBH 24 of patients in PiCCO group were significantly higher than those in tradition group (t=-9.775, -4.769, P<0.01). Fluid infusion coefficient at the second PBH 24 of patients in PiCCO group was significantly lower than that in tradition group (t=2.682, P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in total fluid replacement volume at the second PBH 24 in patients between the two groups (t=1.167, P>0.05). (2) Immediately on admission and PBD 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7, the levels of NT-proBNP of patients in tradition group were respectively 518 (320, 763), 236 (98, 250), 139 (62, 231), 172 (104, 185), 296 (225, 341), 727 (642, 921), 1 840 (1 357, 2 081), 1 005 (671, 1 297) pg/mL, and those in PiCCO group were respectively 444 (206, 601), 66 (29, 73), 54(28, 75), 139(101, 175), 199 (106, 279), 576 (333, 837), 833 (466, 1 080), 485 (225, 710) pg/mL. The levels of NT-proBNP of patients in PiCCO group on PBD 1, 2, 6, and 7 were significantly lower than those in tradition group (Z=-5.004, -3.967, -5.285, -4.626, P<0.01). The levels of NT-proBNP immediately on admission and PBD 3, 4, and 5 in patients between the two groups were close (Z=-0.834, -0.806, -2.665, -2.153, P>0.05). (3) Immediately on admission and PBD 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7, the levels of cTnT of patients in tradition group were respectively (42±15), (21±12), (17±7), (11±4), (12±4), (94±32), (88±23), (42±23) pg/L, and those in PiCCO group were respectively (37±15), (9±3), (10±3), (13±3), (12±5), (85±30), (60±26), (22±14) pg/L. The levels of cTnT of patients in PiCCO group on PBD 1, 2, 6, and 7 were significantly lower than those in tradition group (t=5.227, 4.751, 4.239, 3.845, P<0.01). The levels of cTnT immediately on admission and PBD 3, 4, and 5 of patients between the two groups were close (t=1.098, -1.562, -0.117, 1.107, P>0.05). (4) The levels of CK-MB of patients in PiCCO group on PBD 3, 6, and 7 were significantly lower than those in tradition group (t=3.123, 4.103, 3.178, P<0.05 or P<0.01). The levels of CK-MB immediately on admission and PBD 1, 2, 4, and 5 in patients between the two groups were close (t=0.351, 1.868, 1.100, 0.798, 2.094, P>0.05).@*Conclusions@#PiCCO monitoring technology can monitor and guide fluid resuscitation of patients with large area burn in the early stage more scientifically and reasonably, and the effect of reducing myocardial damage is better than traditional monitoring methods.

Clinical significance of pulse contour cardiac output monitoring technology in guiding fluid replacement during shock stage of extensive burn / 中华烧伤杂志

Objective@#To explore the guiding significance of pulse contour cardiac output (PiCCO) monitoring technology in the treatment of fluid replacement during shock stage of extensive burn in clinic.@*Methods@#Sixty-five patients with extensive burn hospitalized in our unit from January 2014 to December 2018, conforming to the inclusion criteria, were recruited to conduct a prospective controlled research. According to the order of admission, 35 odd-numbered patients and 30 even-numbered patients were enrolled in routine rehydration group (25 males and 10 females) and PiCCO monitoring rehydration group (21 males and 9 females) respectively, with the age of (48±9) and (44±8) years respectively. All patients of the two groups were rehydrated according to the rehydration formula of the Third Military Medical University during shock stage. The rehydration speed was adjusted in routine rehydration group according to the general indexes of shock such as central venous pressure, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, urine volume, and clinical symptoms of patients. PiCCO monitoring was performed in patients of PiCCO monitoring rehydration group, and the global end-diastolic volume index combined with the other relevant indicators of PiCCO were used to guide rehydration on the basis of the monitoring indicators of routine rehydration group. The heart rates and positive fluid balance volumes at post injury hour (PIH) 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72, the diuretic dosage at PIH 48 and 72, the total fluid replacement volumes, urine volumes, blood lactic acid, platelet count, and hematocrit at PIH 24, 48, and 72, the length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and the incidence of complications and death within 28 days after injury were compared between patients in the two groups. Data were processed with analysis of variance for repeated measurement, t test, Bonferroni correction, Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test, and Fisher′s exact probability test.@*Results@#The heart rates of patients in the two groups were similar at PIH 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, and 56 (t=0.775, 1.388, 2.511, 2.203, 1.654, 2.303, 1.808, P>0.05), and the heart rates of patients in PiCCO monitoring rehydration group at PIH 64 and 72 were obviously lower than those of routine rehydration group (t=3.229, 3.357, P<0.05 or P<0.01). The positive fluid balance volumes of patients in the two groups were similar at PIH 8, 16, 40, and 56 (t=0.768, 1.670, 2.134, 2.791, P>0.05), and the positive fluid balance volumes of patients in PiCCO monitoring rehydration group at PIH 24, 32, 48, 64, and 72 were obviously less than those of routine rehydration group (t=3.364, 4.047, 2.930, 2.950, 2.976, P<0.05 or P<0.01). The amount of diuretics used by patients in the two groups was similar at PIH 48 and 72 (Z=-0.697, -1.239, P>0.05). The total fluid replacement volumes of patients in PiCCO monitoring rehydration group at PIH 24, 48, and 72 were (13 864±4 241), (9 532±2 272), and (8 480±2 180) mL, respectively, obviously more than those in routine rehydration group [(10 388±2 445), (8 095±1 720), and (7 059±1 297) mL, respectively, t=-3.970, -2.848, -3.137, P<0.05 or P<0.01]. The urine volumes of patients in the two groups at PIH 24 were close (t=-1.027, P>0.05). The urine volumes of patients in PiCCO monitoring rehydration group at PIH 48 and 72 were (3 051±702) and (3 202±624) mL respectively, obviously more than those in routine rehydration group [(2 401±588) and (2 582±624) mL respectively, t=-4.062, -4.001, P<0.01]. The levels of blood lactate acid of patients in PiCCO monitoring rehydration group at PIH 24, 48, and 72 were obviously lower than those in routine rehydration group (t=4.758, 6.101, 3.938, P<0.01). At PIH 24 and 48, the values of the platelet count of patients in PiCCO monitoring rehydration group were obviously higher than those in routine rehydration group (t=-2.853, -2.499, P<0.05), and the values of hematocrit of patients in PiCCO monitoring rehydration group were obviously lower than those in routine rehydration group (t=2.698, 4.167, P<0.05 or P<0.01). Both the platelet count and hematocrit of patients in the two groups were similar at PIH 72 (t=-1.363, 0.476, P>0.05). The length of ICU stay of patients in PiCCO monitoring rehydration group was obviously shorter than that of routine rehydration group (t=2.184, P<0.05). Within 28 days after injury, the incidence of complications of patients in routine rehydration group was obviously higher than that in PiCCO monitoring rehydration group (P<0.05), while the mortality rate of patients in routine rehydration group was similar to that in PiCCO monitoring rehydration group (P>0.05).@*Conclusions@#The application of PiCCO monitoring technology in monitoring fluid replacement in patients with extensive burn can quickly correct shock, reduce the occurrence of organ complications caused by improper fluid replacement, and shorten the length of ICU stay, which is of great significance in guiding the treatment of burn shock.

[National experts consensus on application of pulse contour cardiac output monitoring technique in severe burn treatment (2018 version)].

As a newly developed technique for hemodynamic monitoring, pulse contour cardiac output (PiCCO) monitoring takes great advantages in guiding shock resuscitation and fluid administration. PiCCO has been used more and more in burn patients in recent years, however there is no clinic consensus on how to apply PiCCO monitoring, understand the significance of PiCCO monitored parameters, and guide the treatment using PiCCO monitored parameters in patients with severe burns. Based on the current literature and the experts' clinical experience, national experts consensus on application of pulse contour cardiac output monitoring technique in severe burn treatment (2018 version) is now issued by the Burn and Trauma Branch of Chinese Geriatrics Society, aiming to provide practical guidance for its usage in clinic.

[National experts consensus on application of pulse contour cardiac output monitoring technique in severe burn treatment (2018 version)].

As a newly developed technique for hemodynamic monitoring, pulse contour cardiac output (PiCCO) monitoring takes great advantages in guiding shock resuscitation and fluid administration. PiCCO has been used more and more in burn patients in recent years, however there is no clinic consensus on how to apply PiCCO monitoring, understand the significance of PiCCO monitored parameters, and guide the treatment using PiCCO monitored parameters in patients with severe burns. Based on the current literatures and the experts' clinical experience, national experts consensus on application of pulse contour cardiac output monitoring technique in severe burn treatment (2018 version) is now issued by the Burn and Trauma Branch of Chinese Geriatrics Society, aiming to provide practical guidance for its usage in clinic.

Cardiovascular Parameters Associated With Troponin I as Indicators for 14-Day Mortality in Patients With Septic Shock.

BACKGROUND: Troponin I is better than other troponin isoforms for monitoring cardiocyte damage, and correlates with sepsis-related mortality. However, hemodynamic factors possibly interact with cardiac function to affect mortality in sepsis. Thus, this study used parameters from pulse-induced contour cardiac output (PiCCO) to investigate the possibility. METHODS: Patients with troponin I tests and sequential organ failure assessment score ≥2 were selected and divided into survivors and nonsurvivors groups and blood troponin I levels between them were compared. Additionally, 65 patients with septic shock and PiCCO records were selected and divided into high cardiac function index (CFI) and low CFI groups and their cardiac function associated with troponin I levels was checked. Furthermore, the patients were classified into 4 subgroups based on CFI and another hemodynamical parameter of PiCCO for identifying if any interaction between CFI and the parameter existed. RESULTS: High blood troponin I levels correlated with high mortality, and with low cardiac function (CFI < 4.5) alone or with low CFI combined with high stroke volume variation (SVV), but did not correlate with global end-diastolic index (GEDI), or systemic vascular resistance index. However, only the subgroup with low CFI and high SVV (CFI < 4.5 and SVV > 10) increased mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Our data give an insight into interactions between cardiac and hemodynamic factors to cause cardiocyte damage and suggest that multiple factors (i.e., low CFI and high SVV) should be considered together to evaluate cardiocyte damage and mortality in sepsis.

[Advances in the research of application of pulse contour cardiac output monitor technology in patients with large area of burns].

Pulse contour cardiac output (PiCCO) monitor as an invasive monitoring technology has been widely applied to various kinds of critical patients. It can reliably reflect actual hemodynamics of critical patients and monitor parameters such as cardiac output. Fluid resuscitation is of great importance for patients with large area of burns. On account of its easy operation as well as precise and comprehensive parameters, PiCCO has been widely used in circulation monitoring of patients with large area of burns. This article briefly introduces PiCCO monitor technology and reviews its application in fluid resuscitation monitoring, diagnosis and identification of pneumonedema in patients with large area of burns, as well as the new theory and knowledge.

Extravascular lung water index and Halperin score to predict outcome in critically ill patients.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe real world extravascular lung water index (EVLWI) measurements obtained by pulse index continuous cardiac output (PiCCO) on the day of admission. These were then related to a radiologic score for lung edema, Halperin score and both the Halperin score and EVLWI were assessed for prediction of in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 311 patients admitted to a tertiary medical university hospital between February 2004 and December 2010 were included in this retrospective analysis and of these 177 patients were intubated. In-hospital mortality was assessed by logistic regression. In the overall cohort, EVLWI and the Halperin score correlated poorly (r = 0.17; p = 0.02). In intubated patients, EVLWI and Halperin score did not correlate (r = 0.09; p = 0.39), whereas in patients who were not intubated there was a moderate association (r = 0.30; p = 0.007). In the overall cohort, (a) EVLWI (hazard ratio [HR] 1.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.19; p = 0.01; area under the curve [AUC] 0.63, 95% CI 0.54-0.71) but not (b) Halperin score (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.996-1.004; p = 0.94; AUC 0.52, 95% CI 0.45-0.58) was associated with in-hospital mortality There was a robust association of EVLWI (HR 1.12, 95% CI 1.01-1.25; p = 0.03) but not Halperin score (HR 1.003, 95% CI 0.997-1.009; p = 0.30) with mortality in non-intubated patients. In intubated patients, neither EVLWI (HR 0.997 95% CI 0.990-1.003; p = 0.33) nor Halperin score (HR 1.08; 95% CI 0.88-1.32; p = 0.47) was associated with mortality. CONCLUSION: The EVLWI correlated moderately with a radiologic score for lung edema, the Halperin score, in non-intubated but not in intubated patients. The EVLWI at admission was associated with in-hospital mortality in our patient collective of critically ill patients and might constitute not only a tool for risk stratification but most importantly a valuable treatment goal.

[Effects of application of pulse contour cardiac output monitoring technology in early treatment of patients with large area burns].

Objective: To analyze the changes and relationship of early hemodynamic indexes of patients with large area burns monitored by pulse contour cardiac output (PiCCO) monitoring technology, so as to assess the guiding value of this technology in the treatment of patients with large area burns during shock period. Methods: Eighteen patients with large area burns, confirming to the study criteria, were admitted to our unit from May 2016 to May 2017. Pulse contour cardiac output index (PCCI), systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI), global end-diastolic volume index (GEDVI), and extravascular lung water index (EVLWI) of patients were monitored by PiCCO instrument from admission to post injury day (PID) 7, and they were calibrated and recorded once every four hours. The fluid infusion coefficients of patients at the first and second 24 hours post injury were calculated. The blood lactic acid values of patients from PID 1 to 7 were also recorded. The correlations among PCCI, SVRI, and GEDVI as well as the correlation between SVRI and blood lactic acid of these 18 patients were analyzed. Prognosis of patients were recorded. Data were processed with one-way analysis of variance, single sample ttest and Bonferroni correction, Pearson correlation analysis, and Spearman rank correlation analysis. Results: (1) There was statistically significant difference in PCCI value of patients from post injury hour (PIH) 4 to 168 (F=7.428, P<0.01). The PCCI values of patients at PIH 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 were (2.4±0.9), (2.6±1.2), (2.2±0.6), (2.6±0.7), (2.8±0.6), and (2.7±0.7) L·min(-1)·m(-2,) respectively, and they were significantly lower than the normal value 4 L·min(-1)·m(-2)(t=-3.143, -3.251, -11.511, -8.889, -6.735, -6.976, P<0.05 or P<0.01). At PIH 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, and 96, the PCCI values of patients were (4.9±1.5), (5.7±2.0), (5.9±1.7), (5.5±1.3), (5.3±1.1), and (4.9±1.4) L·min(-1)·m(-2,) respectively, and they were significantly higher than the normal value (t=2.277, 3.142, 4.050, 4.111, 4.128, 2.423, P<0.05 or P<0.01). The PCCI values of patients at other time points were close to normal value (P>0.05). (2) There was statistically significant difference in SVRI value of patients from PIH 4 to 168 (F=7.863, P<0.01). The SVRI values of patients at PIH 12, 16, 20, 24, and 28 were (2 298±747), (2 581±498), (2 705±780), (2 773±669), and (3 109±1 215) dyn·s·cm(-5)·m(2,) respectively, and they were significantly higher than the normal value 2 050 dyn·s·cm(-5)·m(2)(t=0.878, 3.370, 2.519, 3.747, 3.144, P<0.05 or P<0.01). At PIH 4, 8, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, and 96, the SVRI values of patients were (1 632±129), (2 012±896), (1 381±503), (1 180±378), (1 259±400), (1 376±483), (1 329±385), (1 410±370), and (1 346±346) dyn·s·cm(-5)·m(2,) respectively, and they were significantly lower than the normal value (t=-4.593, -0.112, -5.157, -8.905, -7.914, -5.226, -6.756, -6.233, -7.038, P<0.01). The SVRI values of patients at other time points were close to normal value (P>0.05). (3) There was no statistically significant difference in the GEDVI values of patients from PIH 4 to 168 (F=0.704, P>0.05). The GEDVI values of patients at PIH 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 were significantly lower than normal value (t=-3.112, -3.554, -2.969, -2.450, -2.476, P<0.05). The GEDVI values of patients at other time points were close to normal value (P>0.05). (4) There was statistically significant difference in EVLWI value of patients from PIH 4 to 168 (F=1.859, P<0.01). The EVLWI values of patients at PIH 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, and 40 were significantly higher than normal value (t=4.386, 3.335, 6.363, 4.391, 7.513, 5.392, 5.642, P<0.01). The EVLWI values of patients at other time points were close to normal value (P>0.05). (5) The fluid infusion coefficients of patients at the first and second 24 hours post injury were 1.90 and 1.39, respectively. The blood lactic acid values of patients from PID 1 to 7 were 7.99, 5.21, 4.57, 4.26, 2.54, 3.13, and 3.20 mmol/L, respectively, showing a declined tendency. (6) There was obvious negative correlation between PCCI and SVRI (r=-0.528, P<0.01). There was obvious positive correlation between GEDVI and PCCI (r=0.577, P<0.01). There was no obvious correlation between GEDVI and SVRI (r=0.081, P>0.05). There was obvious positive correlation between blood lactic acid and SVRI (r=0.878, P<0.01). (7) All patients were cured except the one who abandoned treatment. Conclusions: PiCCO monitoring technology can monitor the changes of early hemodynamic indexes and volume of burn patients dynamically, continuously, and conveniently, and provide valuable reference for early-stage comprehensive treatment like anti-shock of patients with large area burns.

National experts consensus on application of pulse contour cardiac output monitoring technique in severe burn treatment (2018 version) / 中华烧伤杂志

As a newly developed technique for hemodynamic monitoring, pulse contour cardiac output (PiCCO) monitoring takes great advantages in guiding shock resuscitation and fluid administration. PiCCO has been used more and more in burn patients in recent years, however there is no clinic consensus on how to apply PiCCO monitoring, understand the significance of PiCCO monitored parameters, and guide the treatment using PiCCO monitored parameters in patients with severe burns. Based on the current literatures and the experts' clinical experience, (2018 ) is now issued by the Burn and Trauma Branch of Chinese Geriatrics Society, aiming to provide practical guidance for its usage in clinic.

Effects of application of pulse contour cardiac output monitoring technology in early treatment of patients with large area burns / 中华烧伤杂志

Objective@#To analyze the changes and relationship of early hemodynamic indexes of patients with large area burns monitored by pulse contour cardiac output (PiCCO) monitoring technology, so as to assess the guiding value of this technology in the treatment of patients with large area burns during shock period.@*Methods@#Eighteen patients with large area burns, confirming to the study criteria, were admitted to our unit from May 2016 to May 2017. Pulse contour cardiac output index (PCCI), systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI), global end-diastolic volume index (GEDVI), and extravascular lung water index (EVLWI) of patients were monitored by PiCCO instrument from admission to post injury day (PID) 7, and they were calibrated and recorded once every four hours. The fluid infusion coefficients of patients at the first and second 24 hours post injury were calculated. The blood lactic acid values of patients from PID 1 to 7 were also recorded. The correlations among PCCI, SVRI, and GEDVI as well as the correlation between SVRI and blood lactic acid of these 18 patients were analyzed. Prognosis of patients were recorded. Data were processed with one-way analysis of variance, single sample ttest and Bonferroni correction, Pearson correlation analysis, and Spearman rank correlation analysis.@*Results@#(1) There was statistically significant difference in PCCI value of patients from post injury hour (PIH) 4 to 168 (F=7.428, P<0.01). The PCCI values of patients at PIH 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 were (2.4±0.9), (2.6±1.2), (2.2±0.6), (2.6±0.7), (2.8±0.6), and (2.7±0.7) L·min-1·m-2, respectively, and they were significantly lower than the normal value 4 L·min-1·m-2(t=-3.143, -3.251, -11.511, -8.889, -6.735, -6.976, P<0.05 or P<0.01). At PIH 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, and 96, the PCCI values of patients were (4.9±1.5), (5.7±2.0), (5.9±1.7), (5.5±1.3), (5.3±1.1), and (4.9±1.4) L·min-1·m-2, respectively, and they were significantly higher than the normal value (t=2.277, 3.142, 4.050, 4.111, 4.128, 2.423, P<0.05 or P<0.01). The PCCI values of patients at other time points were close to normal value (P>0.05). (2) There was statistically significant difference in SVRI value of patients from PIH 4 to 168 (F=7.863, P<0.01). The SVRI values of patients at PIH 12, 16, 20, 24, and 28 were (2 298±747), (2 581±498), (2 705±780), (2 773±669), and (3 109±1 215) dyn·s·cm-5·m2, respectively, and they were significantly higher than the normal value 2 050 dyn·s·cm-5·m2(t=0.878, 3.370, 2.519, 3.747, 3.144, P<0.05 or P<0.01). At PIH 4, 8, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, and 96, the SVRI values of patients were (1 632±129), (2 012±896), (1 381±503), (1 180±378), (1 259±400), (1 376±483), (1 329±385), (1 410±370), and (1 346±346) dyn·s·cm-5·m2, respectively, and they were significantly lower than the normal value (t=-4.593, -0.112, -5.157, -8.905, -7.914, -5.226, -6.756, -6.233, -7.038, P<0.01). The SVRI values of patients at other time points were close to normal value (P>0.05). (3) There was no statistically significant difference in the GEDVI values of patients from PIH 4 to 168 (F=0.704, P>0.05). The GEDVI values of patients at PIH 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 were significantly lower than normal value (t=-3.112, -3.554, -2.969, -2.450, -2.476, P<0.05). The GEDVI values of patients at other time points were close to normal value (P>0.05). (4) There was statistically significant difference in EVLWI value of patients from PIH 4 to 168 (F=1.859, P<0.01). The EVLWI values of patients at PIH 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, and 40 were significantly higher than normal value (t=4.386, 3.335, 6.363, 4.391, 7.513, 5.392, 5.642, P<0.01). The EVLWI values of patients at other time points were close to normal value (P>0.05). (5) The fluid infusion coefficients of patients at the first and second 24 hours post injury were 1.90 and 1.39, respectively. The blood lactic acid values of patients from PID 1 to 7 were 7.99, 5.21, 4.57, 4.26, 2.54, 3.13, and 3.20 mmol/L, respectively, showing a declined tendency. (6) There was obvious negative correlation between PCCI and SVRI (r=-0.528, P<0.01). There was obvious positive correlation between GEDVI and PCCI (r=0.577, P<0.01). There was no obvious correlation between GEDVI and SVRI (r=0.081, P>0.05). There was obvious positive correlation between blood lactic acid and SVRI (r=0.878, P<0.01). (7) All patients were cured except the one who abandoned treatment.@*Conclusions@#PiCCO monitoring technology can monitor the changes of early hemodynamic indexes and volume of burn patients dynamically, continuously, and conveniently, and provide valuable reference for early-stage comprehensive treatment like anti-shock of patients with large area burns.