A Comparison Between the Efficacy of Trigeminal Ganglion Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation and Ultrasound-Guided Maxillary-Mandibular Nerve Pulsed Radiofrequency in the Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Background and objective Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a debilitating disorder characterized by acute episodic attacks of pain that significantly impair patients' quality of life and overall functioning. Initial therapeutic strategies to treat this condition include pharmacological options, particularly carbamazepine. In cases with resistance to dose escalation and polypharmacy, interventional procedures may be warranted. The primary aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of trigeminal ganglion (TG) radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFT) and ultrasound (US)-guided maxillary/mandibular (max/mand) nerve pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) for treating TN, based on the findings at six months post-treatment. The secondary aims were to assess the impact of these interventions on drug consumption and interventional safety based on adverse events. Methods This prospective, randomized, single-blind study was conducted at a single pain clinic. Forty-four patients were randomized into two groups. Group RFT received TG RFT at 60 °C, 65 °C, and 70 °C for 60 seconds each, whereas Group PRF received max/mand PRF for 240 seconds. Pain relief was assessed by using the numeric rating scale (NRS) and intervention effectiveness on medication consumption was evaluated by using the Medication Quantification Scale III (MQS III). The rates of intervention-related adverse events were also compared. Results Both RFT and PRF significantly alleviated pain at one and six months post-treatment compared to baseline (p<0.05). No statistical differences were found in the NRS and MQS III scores between the groups. At six months, 77.3% of RFT patients and 63.9% of PRF patients experienced at least 50% pain relief, with no statistically significant difference. Hypoesthesia occurred in two RFT patients, and masseter weakness was observed in one patient, while no adverse events were reported in the PRF group. Conclusions TG RFT and max/mand PRF are effective treatments for TN. US-guided max/mand PRF, which avoids RFT-associated complications and radiation exposure, may be the superior and preferable option. In this study, the potential space between the coronoid process and maxilla was used to access the maxillary nerve during the maxillary block and PRF procedures, in contrast to the classical approach through the mandibular notch. Further large-scale randomized controlled trials are required to gain deeper insights into the topic.

Outcomes of Twice Repeated High-Voltage Long-Duration Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment in Subacute Postherpetic Neuralgia: a Retrospective Single-Center Analysis.

Background: The treatment of herpes zoster-related pain is challenging, and requires a variety of methods including pulse radio frequency modulation. Among them, single-time high-voltage long-term pulsed radiofrequency (HL-PRF) has been proved to be an effective treatment for subacute postherpetic neuralgia. However, it has the possibility of poor long-term curative effect and recurrence of neuralgia. In this study, we aim to identify the clinical efficacy and safety of twice repeated HL-PRF treatment in patients with subacute postherpetic neuralgia. Design: We conducted a retrospective analysis of subacute postherpetic neuralgia patients who underwent HL-PRF treatment. Setting: Pain Management Department of First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College. Patients: We enrolled all patients with subacute postherpetic neuralgia, who underwent HL-PRF treatment from January 2023 to October 2023. Measurements: The primary outcome variable was the visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores at 1, 4, 8, and 12 weeks after treatment. Secondary outcomes included Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI), 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) score, and total effective rate after treatment. Results: A total of 63 patients were included in the analysis. Among them, 33 patients received single-time HL-PRF treatment (Group S) and 30 patients received twice repeated HL-PRF treatment (Group T). Pain scores, PSQI scores, and SF-36 score were reduced in both groups after treatment (P < 0.001). Compared to group S, the VAS scores, PSQI scores, anxiety scores, and depression scores were significantly lower at 1, 4, 8, and 12 weeks in group T. (P < 0.001). The total efficiency rate at 12 weeks after treatment of group T was statistically higher than that of group S (60.6% vs 86.7%, P < 0.05). Conclusion: Twice repeated high-voltage long-duration PRF therapy demonstrates satisfactory efficacy in patients with subacute postherpetic neuralgia and is associated with no significant adverse reactions.

Image-Guided Minimally Invasive Treatment Options for Degenerative Lumbar Spine Disease: A Practical Overview of Current Possibilities.

Lumbar back pain is one of the main causes of disability around the world. Most patients will complain of back pain at least once in their lifetime. The degenerative spine is considered the main cause and is extremely common in the elderly population. Consequently, treatment-related costs are a major burden to the healthcare system in developed and undeveloped countries. After the failure of conservative treatments or to avoid daily chronic drug intake, invasive treatments should be suggested. In a world where many patients reject surgery and prefer minimally invasive procedures, interventional radiology is pivotal in pain management and could represent a bridge between medical therapy and surgical treatment. We herein report the different image-guided procedures that can be used to manage degenerative spine-related low back pain. Particularly, we will focus on indications, different techniques, and treatment outcomes reported in the literature. This literature review focuses on the different minimally invasive percutaneous treatments currently available, underlining the central role of radiologists having the capability to use high-end imaging technology for diagnosis and subsequent treatment, allowing a global approach, reducing unnecessary surgeries and prolonged pain-reliever drug intake with their consequent related complications, improving patients' quality of life, and reducing the economic burden.

Efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency in the treatment of the ophthalmic branch of postherpetic trigeminal neuralgia.

Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) targeting the supraorbital nerve for treating the ophthalmic branch of postherpetic trigeminal neuralgia. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving patients who presented at the Department of Pain, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University from January 2015 to January 2022. The patients were diagnosed with the first branch of postherpetic trigeminal neuralgia. In total, 63 patients were included based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The patients were divided into the following two groups based on the treatment method used: the nerve block (NB) group (n = 32) and the PRF + NB group (radiofrequency group, n = 31). The visual analog scale (VAS) score, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) score, and pregabalin dose were compared between the two groups before treatment, 1 week after the procedure, and 1, 3, and 6 months post-procedure, and the complications, such as local infection, local hematoma, and decreased visual acuity, were monitored post-treatment. Results: No significant difference was found in terms of pretreatment age, sex, course of disease, preoperative VAS score, preoperative PSQI score, and preoperative pregabalin dose between the two groups (P > 0.05). The postoperative VAS score, PSQI score, and pregabalin dose were significantly decreased in both groups. Furthermore, significant differences were found between the two groups at each preoperative and postoperative time point (P < 0.05). The VAS score was lower in the radiofrequency group than in the NB group at 1, 3, and 6 months, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The PSQI score was lower in the radiofrequency group than in the NB group at 1 week, 1, 3, and 6 months post-procedure, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The dose of pregabalin was lower in the radiofrequency group than in the NB group at 1 week, 1, 3, and 6 months post-procedure, and the difference was statistically significant at 3 and 6 months (P < 0.05). After 6 months of treatment, the excellent rate of VAS score in the radiofrequency group was 70.96%, and the overall effective rate was 90.32%, which was higher than that in the NB group. The difference in the efficacy was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion: PRF targeting the supraorbital nerve can effectively control the pain in the first branch of the trigeminal nerve after herpes, enhance sleep quality, and reduce the dose of pregabalin. Thus, this study shows that PRF is safe under ultrasound guidance and is worthy of clinical application.

Clinical efficacy of high-voltage pulsed radiofrequency combined with stellate ganglion block in the acute phase of thoracic and dorsal herpes zoster neuralgia under dual guidance of ultrasound and C-arm.

OBJECTIVES: A single therapeutic approach is not always successful in the treatment of herpes zoster neuralgia, and the appropriate combination of different treatments deserves further exploration. In this study, we investigated the clinical efficacy of high-voltage long-duration pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) combined with stellate ganglion block (SGB) in the acute phase of thoracic and dorsal herpes zoster neuralgia under dual guidance of ultrasound and C-arm. METHODS: 79 cases of acute zoster neuralgia were grouped premised upon differing therapeutic approaches: standard voltage PRF (group S, the temperature, duration, pulse width, frequency and voltage were set to 42 °C, 300 s, 20 ms, 2 Hz, and 45 V), high-voltage long-duration PRF (group H, parameters of PRF were set to 42 °C, 900 s, 20 ms, 2 Hz, and 90 V, respectively), and high-voltage long-duration PRF combined with SGB (group C, parameter settings for PRF are the same as those for group H). The therapeutic outcomes were assessed utilizing the numeric rating scale (NRS), Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI), and Hamilton anxiety rating scale (HAMA). The incidence of clinically significant postherpetic neuralgia post-treatment had been documented. RESULTS: Compared to baseline, scores of NRS, PSQI, and HAMA at each time point post-treatment decreased across all groups, and the decrease was more significant in the C group than in the S group. At the later stage of treatment, the consumption of pregabalin and tramadol and the plasma levels of interleukin-6 and galectin-3 in the C group were significantly lower than those in the S group. The incidence of PHN in the C group was significantly lower than in the S group. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of high-voltage long-duration PRF combined with SGB under dual guidance of ultrasound and C-arm represents a safe, effective, environmentally friendly, and cost-efficient method for treating AZN, significantly improving sleep quality, alleviating anxiety, and reducing the risk of PHN occurrence.

Pulsed Radiofrequency Neuromodulation of the Greater Occipital Nerve for the Treatment of Headache Disorders in Adults: A Systematic Review.

Background: Pulsed radiofrequency neuromodulation (PRFN) of greater occipital nerve (GON) is considered in patients with headaches failing to achieve sustained analgesic benefit from nerve blocks with local anesthetic and steroids. However, the evidence supporting this practice is unclear. Aims: This narrative systematic review aims to explore the effectiveness and safety of GON PRFN on headaches. Methods: Databases were searched for studies, published up to February 1, 2024, investigating PRFN of GON for adults with headaches. Abstracts and posters were excluded. Primary outcome was change in headache intensity. Secondary outcomes included effect on monthly headache frequency (MHF), mental and physical health, mood, sleep, analgesic consumption, and side-effects. Two reviewers screened and extracted data. Results: Twenty-two papers (2 randomized controlled trials (RCT), 11 cohort, and 9 case reports/series) including 608 patients were identified. Considerable heterogeneity in terms of study design, headache diagnosis, PRF target and settings, and image-guidance was noted. PRFN settings varied (38-42°C, 40-60 V, and 150-400 Ohms). Studies demonstrated PRFN to provide significant analgesia and reduction of MHF in chronic migraine (CM) from 3 to 6 months; and significant pain relief for ON from six to ten months. Mild adverse effects were reported in 3.1% of cohort. A minority of studies reported on secondary outcomes. The quality of the evidence was low. Conclusions: Low-quality evidence indicates an analgesic benefit from PRFN of GON for ON and CM, but its role for other headache types needs more investigation. Optimal PRFN target and settings remain unclear. High-quality RCTs are required to further explore the role of this intervention. PROSPERO ID CRD42022363234.

Contexte: La neuromodulation par radiofréquence pulsée (NRFP) du nerf grand occipital (NGO) est envisagée chez les patients souffrant de céphalées qui ne parviennent pas à obtenir un bénéfice analgésique durable à partir des blocages nerveux à l'aide d'un anesthésique local et de stéroïdes. Cependant, les données probantes à l'appui de cette pratique ne sont pas claires.Objectifs: Cette revue systématique narrative vise à explorer l'efficacité et la sécurité de la NRFP du NGO sur les maux de téte.Méthodes: Des bases de données ont été consultées pour trouver des études, publiées jusqu'au 1er février 2024, portant sur la NRFP du NGO chez des adultes souffrant de céphalées. Les résumés et les affiches ont été exclus. Le critére principal était le changement dans l'intensité des maux de téte. Les critéres secondaires comprenaient l'effet sur la fréquence mensuelle des céphalées, la santé mentale et physique, l'humeur, le sommeil, la consommation d'analgésiques et les effets secondaires. Deux examinateurs ont évalué et extrait les données.Résultats: Vingt-deux articles (2 essais contrôlés randomisés, 11 cohortes et 9 rapports de cas/séries) portant sur 608 patients ont été recensés. Une hétérogénéité considérable a été observée en termes de devis de l'étude, de diagnostic des céphalées, de la cible et des paramétres de la FRP et de l'orientation de l'image. Les réglages de la NRFP variaient (38-42°C, 40-60 V, et 150-400 Ohms). Les études ont démontré que la NRFP procurait une analgésie significative et réduisait la fréquence des céphalées dans la migraine chronique de trois à six mois, et un soulagement significatif de la douleur pour la névralgie occipitale pendant six à dix mois. Des effets indésirables légers ont été signalés dans 3,1 % des participants de la cohorte. Une minorité déétudes ont fait état de résultats secondaires. La qualité des données probantes était faible.Conclusions: Les données probantes de faible qualité indiquent un bénéfice analgésique de la NRFP du NGO pour la névralgie occipitale et la migraine chronique, mais son rôle pour d'autres types de céphalées doit être davantage étudié. La cible et les paramétres optimaux de la NRFP restent floues. Des essais contrôlés randomisés de haute qualité sont nécessaires pour explorer davantage le rôle de cette intervention.

Comparison of greater occipital nerve blockade with radiofrequency and steroid in chronic migraine.

OBJECTIVES: The study aims to retrospectively compare steroid and radiofrequency treatments for the greater occipital nerve(GON) under ultrasound guidance in chronic migraine. METHODS: Monthly average headache attack frequency, attack duration, visual analog scale(VAS) and the number of days analgesics were taken were recorded. Under ultrasound guidance, GON block was administered once a week for a total of four sessions. In the final session, 4 mg of dexamethasone was added to the local anesthetic for the steroid group (n:26). Pulsed radiofrequency (RF) treatment was applied to the RF group (n:25) just before the last session of the GON block. The pain course in the week following the procedure monthly average headache attack frequency, attack duration, VAS and the number of days analgesics were taken in a month were compared for both groups at 1-3-6 months. RESULTS: In the first month, a statistically significant decrease in attack frequency was observed in the RF group. However, no statistically significant differences were found between the groups in other findings at different time intervals. A significant decrease headache attack duration,VAS, and the number of days analgesics were taken in a month was observed in both treatment groups. Both treatments were found to be effective, but the effect size of the treatment was higher in the RF group compared to the steroid group. CONCLUSION: Although the results were better in the group receiving pulsed RF treatment, except for the attack frequency in the first month, no statistically significant superiority of one treatment method over the other was determined.

A Multi-centered Retrospective Study on the Efficacy of Pulsed Radiofrequency Nerve Ablation in the Treatment of Recalcitrant Plantar Fasciitis: A Mid-term Outcome.

Background Plantar fasciitis, a condition marked by persistent and often excruciating heel pain, frequently poses a formidable hurdle when conservative treatment approaches fall short. This multi-centered retrospective study embarks on a journey to explore the potential effectiveness of pulsed radiofrequency nerve ablation (RFNA), an innovative and less invasive procedure, as a novel avenue for treating recalcitrant plantar fasciitis. This investigation centers around a group of 24 patients who have faced the persistence of this challenging ailment. By meticulously scrutinizing patient outcomes and conducting a comprehensive analysis of safety aspects, this study aspires to offer enlightening revelations regarding the promise and practicality of pulsed RFNA as a therapeutic solution for tackling this intricate and tenacious condition. Methods This retrospective study included 24 patients who had undergone pulsed RFNA for recalcitrant plantar fasciitis between June 1, 2020, and June 1, 2022, at Hospital Pengajar Universiti Putra Malaysia (HPUPM), Hospital Universiti Teknologi Mara (UiTM), and Hospital Serdang. Patients were selected from the Orthopedic Clinics at HPUPM, Hospital UiTM, and Hospital Serdang and were screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patient data was extracted from the hospital information system and electronic medical records. Pre-procedure and post-procedure assessments were conducted at one, three, and six months on the selected patients using the visual analog scale and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scoring systems. All selected patient data was traced and tabulated accordingly. Results This study evaluates the effectiveness of pulsed RFNA in treating recalcitrant plantar fasciitis in 24 participants (39 feet). Results show a significant reduction in pain and improvement in functionality at one, three, and six months post-RFNA. Demographic factors (age, gender, and specific diagnosis) did not significantly impact outcomes. The study supports pulsed RFNA as an effective treatment for recalcitrant plantar fasciitis, emphasizing consistent benefits across various patient characteristics. Conclusion In conclusion, the study demonstrates the notable effectiveness of pulsed RFNA in improving pain reduction and functional outcomes for individuals with recalcitrant plantar fasciitis. The findings, consistent across various demographic factors, support pulsed RFNA as a promising and uniform treatment option for those who do not respond to conservative measures.

Efficacy of ganglion impar block combined with pudendal nerve pulsed radiofrequency for pudendal neuralgia management-a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Pudendal neuralgia is a chronic and debilitating condition. Its prevalence ranges from 5 to 26%. Currently, therapeutic approaches to treat pudendal neuralgia include patient education, medication management, psychological and physical therapy, and procedural interventions, such as nerve block, trigger point injections, and surgery. Drug therapy has a limited effect on pain relief. A pudendal nerve block may cause a significant decrease in pain scores for a short time; however, its efficacy significantly decreases over time. In contrast, pudendal nerve pulsed radiofrequency can provide pain relief for 3 months, and ganglion impar block has been widely used for treating chronic perineal pain and chronic coccygodynia. This study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of monotherapy (pudendal nerve pulsed radiofrequency) and combination therapy (pudendal nerve pulsed radiofrequency plus ganglion impar block) in patients with pudendal neuralgia. METHODS: This randomized, controlled clinical trial will include 84 patients with pudendal neuralgia who failed to respond to drug or physical therapy. Patients will be randomly assigned into one of the two groups: mono or combined treatment groups. The primary outcome will be a change in pain intensity measured using the visual analog scale. The secondary outcomes will include a Self-Rating Anxiety Scale score, Self-Rating Depression Scale score, the use of oral analgesics, the Medical Outcomes Study Health Survey Short Form-36 Item score, and the occurrence of adverse effects. The study results will be analyzed using intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses. Primary and secondary outcomes will be evaluated between the mono and combined treatment groups. Subgroup analyses will be conducted based on the initial ailment, age, and baseline pain intensity. The safety of the treatment will be assessed by monitoring adverse events, which will be compared between the two groups. DISCUSSION: This study protocol describes a randomized, controlled clinical trial to determine the efficacy and safety of mono and combination therapies in patients with pudendal neuralgia. The study results will provide valuable information on the potential benefits of this combination therapy and contribute to the development of more effective and safer treatments for patients with pudendal neuralgia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2200061800).

Effects of Pulsed Radiofrequency Duration in Patients With Chronic Lumbosacral Radicular Pain: A Randomized Double-Blind Study.

OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that the duration of pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) application may affect the effectiveness of PRF in patients with chronic lumbosacral radicular pain (LRP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective, double-blind, randomized study, 68 patients were randomly allocated to two groups: a 6-minute group, in which PRF was applied at 42 °C for 2 minutes followed by a 2-minute pause, repeated three times; and a 12-minute group, with a continuous application at 42 °C for 12 minutes. The total application time in each group was equal. After PRF, 2 to 3 mL of 1% lidocaine with 5 mg of dexamethasone was injected. The primary outcome was the intensity of leg pain measured using a numerical rating scale (NRS) three months after the procedure. The secondary outcomes were intensities of leg and back pain, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), the Medication Quantification Scale III (MQS), the Global Perceived Effect of Satisfaction (GPES), and the incidence of adverse events during follow-up. Primary and secondary outcomes were analyzed using a linear mixed-effect model in the modified intention-to-treat population. RESULTS: Each group comprised 34 patients. Three patients in each group did not receive the allocated intervention owing to alleviation of pain. The estimated NRS mean of leg pain at three months was 4.0 (95% CI, 3.2-4.9) and 4.5 (95% CI, 3.6-5.4) in the 6- and 12-minute groups, respectively, with no significant difference between groups (estimated mean difference, -0.5; 95% CI, -1.8 to 0.8; p = 0.436). Regarding the intensities of leg and back pain, ODI, MQS, and GPES, there was no significant difference between the two groups except for GPES at six months. No adverse events were observed in the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with chronic LRP, a prolonged PRF application of 12 minutes, compared with 6 minutes, caused no significant difference in leg pain intensity. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Clinicaltrials.gov registration number under the Clinical Trial Registry of Korea for the study is KCT0003850; https://cris.nih.go.kr.

Pulsed Radiofrequency Ablation for Refractory Cancer-Related Leg Pain: A Case Report.

Metastatic cancers often lead to distant metastasis, accompanied by debilitating symptoms such as chronic pain, which can be refractory to conventional analgesic modalities. Pulsed radiofrequency ablation (Pulsed RFA) has emerged as a promising intervention for neuropathic pain syndromes, offering long-lasting relief with minimal tissue damage. We present a case of a 36-year-old male with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma and refractory leg pain due to femoral nerve involvement. Despite aggressive multimodal analgesia, the patient experienced persistent pain, necessitating alternative interventions. Pulsed RFA targeting the right L2-L4 dorsal root ganglia (DRG) provided significant and sustained pain relief, allowing improved functional status and reduced opioid requirements. This case underscores the potential of pulsed RFA as an effective intervention for refractory cancer-related pain, enhancing patients' comfort and quality of life. Further research is warranted to establish its long-term efficacy and safety.

Efficacy of pulsed radiofrequency on the suprascapular and axillary-circumflex nerve for shoulder pain: A randomised controlled trial.

Background and Aims: Painful shoulder is one of the most frequent consultation causes. Multiple treatments have been described to relieve pain, restore range of motion and improve functionality. Methods: This randomised clinical trial was conducted in 60 patients. The treatment group received combined pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) on suprascapular nerve (SN) and axillary-circumflex nerve (ACN). The control group received PRF on SN only. The primary outcome was pain intensity measured by the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). The secondary outcomes were the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), the Constant-Murley range of motion scale and Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scale. The patients were monitored at the baseline visit and at 1, 3, 6 and 9 months. A mixed ordinal regression model was estimated to evaluate the association between the study group and pain measured with NRS. Results: A global decrease in pain at the end of the study was noted. The global baseline NRS was 8.4, and the global final NRS at 9 months of follow-up was 6.2. Combined PRF on SN and ACN was not associated with lower NRS pain scores compared to single SN PRF [odds ratio (OR) =1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.91-1.20, P = 0.507]. Secondary outcomes showed no significant differences: SPADI (OR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.92-1.18), Constant-Murley (OR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.90-1.14), DASH (OR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.92-1.17). Conclusion: Combined PRF applied to SN and ACN was not superior to PRF applied to SN alone.

Comparing the efficacy and safety of high-voltage and standard-voltage pulsed radiofrequency for the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia: A pooled analysis from randomized controlled trials.

Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is one of the most common and serious complications of herpes zoster infection. Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) therapy has emerged to be a neuromodulation technique for the treatment of PHN. Two therapeutic options are available for PRF, including high-voltage and standard-voltage PRF. Some studies suggested that the former one had better clinical efficacy than the latter one. For the first time, this pooled analysis compared the efficacy and safety of these two surgeries for the treatment of PHN. Five commonly used databases were applied to identify the eligible studies. This study was registered on the PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023460236), which provided more relevant information. Finally, four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 285 participants were included. The combined odds ratios (OR) showed that high-voltage PRF exhibited a significantly higher treatment efficiency than the standard PRF (OR = 1.4, 95%CI: 1.16 to 1.69, P < 0.001). Additionally, the visual analogue scale (VAS) in the high-voltage PRF group was significantly lower than that of the standard PRF group at one week (SMD = -0.776, 95%CI: -1.408 to -0.145, P = 0.016), one month (SMD = -0.544, 95%CI: -0.907 to -0.180, P = 0.003), and three months (SMD = -1.096, 95%CI: -1.504 to -0.687, P < 0.001) after treatment, particularly at the three months after surgery. However, the VAS was comparable between the two groups (SMD = -0.94, 95%CI: -1.985 to 0.104, P = 0.077). Patients who underwent high-voltage PRF did not have a significantly higher incidence of adverse events than those with standard PRF (OR = 1.56, 95%CI: 0.78 to 3.13, P = 0.208). In summary, the current study revealed that high-voltage PRF is superior to standard-voltage PRF in improving analgesic efficacy in patients with PHN. Additionally, it does not increase the incidence of treatment-related adverse effects. Further studies are still warranted to determine the optimal voltage and duration of PRF treatment for patients with PHN.

Radiofrequency for chronic lumbosacral and cervical pain: Results of a consensus study using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method.

BACKGROUND: Despite the routine use of radiofrequency (RF) for the treatment of chronic pain in the lumbosacral and cervical region, there remains uncertainty on the most appropriate patient selection criteria. This study aimed to develop appropriateness criteria for RF in relation to relevant patient characteristics, considering RF ablation (RFA) for the treatment of chronic axial pain and pulsed RF (PRF) for the treatment of chronic radicular pain. METHODS: The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method (RUAM) was used to explore the opinions of a multidisciplinary European panel on the appropriateness of RFA and PRF for a variety of clinical scenarios. Depending on the type of pain (axial or radicular), the expert panel rated the appropriateness of RFA and PRF for a total of 219 clinical scenarios. RESULTS: For axial pain in the lumbosacral or cervical region, appropriateness of RFA was determined by the dominant pain trigger and location of tenderness on palpation with higher appropriateness scores if these variables were suggestive of the diagnosis of facet or sacroiliac joint pain. Although the opinions on the appropriateness of PRF for lumbosacral and cervical radicular pain were fairly dispersed, there was agreement that PRF is an appropriate option for well-selected patients with radicular pain due to herniated disc or foraminal stenosis, particularly in the absence of motor deficits. The panel outcomes were embedded in an educational e-health tool that also covers the psychosocial aspects of chronic pain, providing integrated recommendations on the appropriate use of (P)RF interventions for the treatment of chronic axial and radicular pain in the lumbosacral and cervical region. CONCLUSIONS: A multidisciplinary European expert panel established patient-specific recommendations that may support the (pre)selection of patients with chronic axial and radicular pain in the lumbosacral and cervical region for either RFA or PRF (accessible via https://rftool.org). Future studies should validate these recommendations by determining their predictive value for the outcomes of (P)RF interventions.

Accuracy of augmented reality-guided needle placement for pulsed radiofrequency treatment of pudendal neuralgia: a pilot study on a phantom model.

Background: Pudendal neuralgia (PN) is a chronic neuropathy that causes pain, numbness, and dysfunction in the pelvic region. The current state-of-the-art treatment is pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) in which a needle is supposed to be placed close to the pudendal nerve for neuromodulation. Given the effective range of PRF of 5 mm, the accuracy of needle placement is important. This study aimed to investigate the potential of augmented reality guidance for improving the accuracy of needle placement in pulsed radiofrequency treatment for pudendal neuralgia. Methods: In this pilot study, eight subjects performed needle placements onto an in-house developed phantom model of the pelvis using AR guidance. AR guidance is provided using an in-house developed application on the HoloLens 2. The accuracy of needle placement was calculated based on the virtual 3D models of the needle and targeted phantom nerve, derived from CBCT scans. Results: The median Euclidean distance between the tip of the needle and the target is found to be 4.37 (IQR 5.16) mm, the median lateral distance is 3.25 (IQR 4.62) mm and the median depth distance is 1.94 (IQR 7.07) mm. Conclusion: In this study, the first method is described in which the accuracy of patient-specific needle placement using AR guidance is determined. This method could potentially improve the accuracy of PRF needle placement for pudendal neuralgia, resulting in improved treatment outcomes.

Comparison of tibial nerve pulsed radiofrequency and intralesional radiofrequency thermocoagulation in the treatment of painful calcaneal spur and plantar fasciitis: A randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: Ultrasound-guided tibial nerve pulsed radiofrequency (US-TN PRF) and fluoroscopy-guided intralesional radiofrequency thermocoagulation (FL-RFT) adjacent to the painful calcaneal spur are two interventions for pain management in painful calcaneal spur (PCS) and plantar fasciitis (PF). This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of the two procedures. DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, single-blind study. SETTING: Single-center pain clinic. SUBJECTS: Forty-nine patients who met the inclusion criteria were randomized into two groups. METHODS: 25 patients (group U) received US-TN PRF at 42 °C for 240 s, while 24 patients (group F) received intralesional FL-RFT at 80 °C for 90 s. The most severe Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score during the first morning steps and the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle hindfoot scores were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the procedures. The study's primary outcome assessed treatment effectiveness using the NRS, whereas the secondary outcomes included changes in the AOFAS score and the incidence of procedure-related mild adverse events. RESULTS: NRS and AOFAS scores significantly improved in groups U and F at 1 and 3 months compared to baseline (p < 0.05), and there was no significant difference between the groups. At month 1, 50% or greater pain relief was achieved in 72% of patients in group U and 75% in group F. No significant difference was observed in the incidence of mild adverse events between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: US-TN PRF and intralesional FL-RFT have shown significant effectiveness in the treatment of PCS and PF. Larger randomized controlled trials are needed.

Comparative evaluation of functional outcome and pain relief after pulsed radiofrequency of the saphenous nerve within and distal to the adductor canal in medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: A randomized double-blind trial.

Background and Aims: Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) of the saphenous nerve (SN) has shown effective pain relief in knee pain because of knee osteoarthritis (KOA). The adductor canal (AC) contains other sensory nerves innervating the medial part of the knee joint apart from SN. We compared the PRF of SN within and outside the AC for their quality and duration of pain relief in knee osteoarthritis of the medial compartment (KOA-MC). Material and Methods: We conducted a randomized prospective study in 60 patients with anteromedial knee pain because of KOA-MC. Patients in group A received PRF-SN, and those in group B received PRF-AC. The primary objectives were comparison of pain by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores and changes in quality of daily living by Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and OXFORD knee scores. The secondary objectives were comparison of analgesic requirements using Medicine Quantification Scale (MQS) scores and block-related complications. Intra-group comparison was performed by analysis of variance. Inter-group normally distributed data were assessed by Student's t-test, non-normally distributed and ordinal data were assessed by Mann-Whitney U-test, and categorical data were assessed by Chi-square test. A P value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results: VAS scores were significantly lower in Gr-B at 12 weeks. The WOMAC scores and OXFORD scores at 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks were significantly lower in Gr-B compared to Gr-A. Conclusion: The PRF-AC provides better pain relief and functional outcome than PRF-SN; however, duration of pain relief was not significantly different.

Pulsed Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields as Modulators of Inflammation and Wound Healing in Primary Dermal Fibroblasts of Ulcers.

Venous leg ulcers are one of the most common nonhealing conditions and represent an important clinical problem. The application of pulsed radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (PRF-EMFs), already applied for pain, inflammation, and new tissue formation, can represent a promising approach for venous leg ulcer amelioration. This study aims to evaluate the effect of PRF-EMF exposure on the inflammatory, antioxidant, cell proliferation, and wound healing characteristics of human primary dermal fibroblasts collected from venous leg ulcer patients. The cells' proliferative and migratory abilities were evaluated by means of a BrdU assay and scratch assay, respectively. The inflammatory response was investigated through TNFα, TGFß, COX2, IL6, and IL1ß gene expression analysis and PGE2 and IL1ß production, while the antioxidant activity was tested by measuring GSH, GSSG, tGSH, and GR levels. This study emphasizes the ability of PRF-EMFs to modulate the TGFß, COX2, IL6, IL1ß, and TNFα gene expression in exposed ulcers. Moreover, it confirms the improvement of the proliferative index and wound healing ability presented by PRF-EMFs. In conclusion, exposure to PRF-EMFs can represent a strategy to help tissue repair, regulating mediators involved in the wound healing process.

Predictive value of S100B and brain derived neurotrophic factor for radiofrequency treatment of lumbar disc prolapse.

BACKGROUND: This work aimed to analyze serum S100B levels and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in patients with lumbar disc prolapse to test their predictive values concerning the therapeutic efficacy of pulsed radiofrequency. METHODS: This prospective interventional study was carried out on 50 patients candidates for radiofrequency for treating symptomatic lumbar disc prolapse. Pain severity and functional disability were assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and Functional rating index (FRI) before as well as two weeks, 1, 3, and 6 months after the radiofrequency. Quantitative assessment of serum S100B level and BDNF was done for all the included patients one day before radiofrequency. RESULTS: The scores of NRS and FRI were significantly improved at two weeks, 1, 3, and 6 months following radiofrequency (P-value < 0.001 in all comparisons). Statistically significant positive correlations were found between duration of pain, NRS, and S100B serum level before radiofrequency, and both NRS (P-value = 0.001, 0.035, < 0.001 respectively) and FRI (P-value = < 0.001, 0.009, 0.001 respectively) 6 months following radiofrequency. Whereas there were statistically significant negative correlations between BDNF serum level before radiofrequency and both NRS and FRI 6 months following radiofrequency (P-value = 0.022, 0.041 respectively). NRS and S100B serum levels before radiofrequency were found to be independent predictors of NRS 6 months following radiofrequency (P-value = 0.040. <0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Serum level of S100B is a promising biomarker that can predict functional outcomes after pulsed radiofrequency in patients with lumbar disc prolapse.