Trans-radial artery microcatheter angiography-assisted juvenile ruptured brainstem arteriovenous malformation resection.

BACKGROUND: Due to their crucial functional location, surgical treatment of brainstem arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) has always been challenging. For unruptured AVMs, we can determine whether radiological therapy, interventional treatment, or surgical resection is feasible based on the AVM structure. However, for ruptured AVMs, microsurgical resection and interventional embolization are effective methods to prevent further rupture. In the microsurgical resection of AVMs, we usually use a hybrid operation to confirm the AVM structure and determine if the AVM is completely resected during the surgery. METHOD: We report a case of juvenile ruptured brainstem AVM resection. The right lateral position and left suboccipital retrosigmoid approach were used. We established an interventional approach via left radial artery and set a microcatheter in the feeding artery. Methylene blue injection via a microcatheter showed the AVM structure, and we totally resected the brainstem AVM under electrophysiological monitoring and navigation. Intraoperative angiography was performed to ensure complete resection without residual nidus. CONCLUSION: This case demonstrates that the trans-radial approach is convenient and safe for special positions in hybrid operations. Methylene blue injection via a microcatheter in the feeding artery provides clearer visualization of the AVM structure under the microscope.

The feasibility, efficacy, and safety of RDN procedure using CO2 angiography through radial artery in severe chronic kidney disease patients.

The recent evidence regarding the effectiveness of renal denervation (RDN) in blood pressure control is becoming increasingly substantial. However, many studies have excluded populations with severely impaired kidney function, even though these individuals have a higher prevalence of hypertension compared to the general population, and controlling their blood pressure is more challenging. The effectiveness and safety of RDN in patients with severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) lack strong evidence support. Concerns about worsening kidney function still exist, particularly in patients with CKD stage 5. We conducted an observational study involving 10 patients who were using at least 3 different antihypertensive medications and had an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 but had not undergone dialysis. For these patients, we performed RDN via the radial artery approach, with the assistance of carbon dioxide (CO2) angiography. Utilizing this approach, the systolic 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring did not exhibit a significant decrease at 3 months; however, a significant reduction was observed at 6 months after RDN. We also minimized contrast agent usage, observed no kidney function decline 3 months post-RDN, and experienced no vascular-related complications. Using the radial artery approach and CO2 angiography assistance for RDN may be an effective and safe blood pressure control method for patients with severe kidney impairment.

Coronary Angiography and Chronic Total Occlusion Angioplasty in a Patient With Situs Inversus from the Right Radial Approach.

We present the case of a patient with known situs inversus referred for cardiac catheterization, which revealed a chronic total occlusion of the right coronary artery. Situs inversus, a rare congenital abnormality, is a term used to describe the inverted position of the chest and abdominal organs. Cardiac catheterization is rare in patients with this particular abnormality. It is important to customize techniques to engage coronary arteries and optimize guide support if percutaneous coronary intervention is required in these particular cases.

Distal Transradial Access For Cardiac Catheterization in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis.

OBJECTIVES: Although a distal radial artery (DRA) approach has recently been used in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization, no studies have so far investigated the safety and feasibility of DRA in patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD). We aimed to investigate the incidence of conventional radial artery (CRA) occlusion and puncture site complications after DRA puncture in patients undergoing HD. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 117 consecutive patients with HD who underwent coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention via a DRA approach at our institution from September 2017 to December 2019. The primary endpoint was the incidence of CRA occlusion after DRA puncture, as assessed via vascular ultrasonography. Secondary endpoints included difficulty achieving hemostasis, DRA occlusion, aneurysm, arteriovenous shunt, and acute ischemia. RESULTS: The DRA puncture was successful in 106 patients (success rate: 90.5%). Because 21 patients lacked postprocedural vascular ultrasonography data, the primary endpoint was evaluated in 85 patients. CRA occlusion occurred in three patients (3.5%) following DRA puncture. DRA occlusion and aneurysm occurred in five patients (5.9%) and one patient (1.2%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Catheterization through DRA is feasible in patients undergoing HD, with a clinically acceptable incidence of CRA and complications.

Anatomical Factors That Impede Using the Radial Artery Approach for Carotid Artery Revascularization.

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the anatomical characteristics that complicate utilizing the radial artery approach (RAA) for craniocervical intravascular intervention. METHODS: The data of 73 lesions in 65 consecutive patients who underwent transradial cervical carotid artery intervention was evaluated. We assessed the success rate of RAA in right-sided and left-sided lesions. The diameters and angles of the left and right common carotid arteries and the aortic, brachiocephalic, and right subclavian arteries, which constitute the paths of the guiding sheath, were assessed for each of the left- and right-sided lesions. RESULTS: It was difficult to apply RAA in 10 cases (13.7%), of which 2 (5.0%) involved right-sided and 8 (24.2%) left-sided lesions. The approach was significantly more difficult to perform in left-sided than in right-sided lesions (P = 0.02). Although the treatments were successfully completed, crossover to the femoral artery approach was required in 4 cases (5.5%, 2 cases for left-sided lesions). Placement of the guiding sheath in the common carotid artery was successful for all right-sided lesions; however, the guiding sheath slipped off to the aorta during stent advancement in 2 cases. When the angle between the brachiocephalic artery and aortic arch was small, the introduction of the guiding sheath to left-sided lesions was difficult in eight cases (P = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: RAA was difficult to perform in cases involving left-sided lesions and a small angle between the brachiocephalic artery and aortic arch. This study could help delineate the factors associated with difficulty of catheter introduction and instability of RAA.

Distal Radial Secondary Access for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: The Minimalistic Approach.

BACKGROUND: Although not yet recommended by the guidelines, distal radial access, a new site for cardiovascular interventions, has been rapidly acknowledged and adopted by many centers due to its high rate of success, safety and fewer complications. We present our experience using secondary distal radial access during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), proposing a new, even more minimal approach. METHODS: As of November 2020, a systematic distal radial approach as secondary access site for TAVI was adopted in our center. Primary endpoints were technical success and major adverse events (MAEs). Secondary endpoints: the access site complication rate, hemodynamic and clinical results of the intervention, procedural related factors, crossover rate to the femoral access site, and hospitalization duration (in days). RESULTS: From November 2020, 41 patients underwent TAVI using this strategy. Patients had a mean age of 76 ± 11.2 years, 41% were male. Six (14.63%) patients received a balloon-expandable valve and 35 (85.37%) received a self-expandable valve. TAVI was successful in all cases. No complications occurred due to transradial access. Puncture success, defined as completed sheath placement was maximum (N = 41/41,100%) and emergent transfemoral secondary access was not required in any case. Primary transfemoral vascular access site complications occurred in 7 cases (17%) of which 4 (13.63%) were resolved through distal radial access: one occlusion, two flow-limiting stenoses and four perforations of the common femoral artery. There were no additional major vascular complications at 30 days. Overall MACE rate was 2.4%. CONCLUSION: The use of the distal radial approach for secondary access in TAVI is safe, feasible and has several advantages over old access sites.

Distal radial artery approach for endovascular therapy.

It has been reported that the distal transradial approach (dTRA) is safe and useful for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In this study we evaluated the safety and efficacy of the dTRA for endovascular therapy (EVT). The dTRA for EVT was performed in 43 lesions from 35 patients. Approach site was determined at the discretion of the operator. Clinical data were analyzed retrospectively. Average patient age was 74.0 ± 6.5 years; 30 (86%) were male; average height was 161.1 ± 8.4 cm. Diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and smoking habit were present in 19 (54.3%), 31 (88.6%), 29 (82.9%), and 29 (82.9%) patients, respectively. Target lesions were iliac artery in 38 (88.4%) patients, superficial femoral artery in 4 (9.3%) and renal artery in the remaining patient (2.3%). Eight lesions (18.6%) were chronic total occlusions. Thirteen (30.2%), 2 (4.7%), and 28 (65.1%) lesions were treated using 4.5, 6, and 7 French long guiding systems, respectively. All lesions were successfully treated without any procedural or access site-related complications. No additional puncture sites were required. Ankle brachial index significantly improved from 0.62 ± 0.20 to 0.92 ± 0.17 (p < 0.0001) post-treatment for the lower limbs. There were no radial artery occlusions, target lesion revascularization, or complications 1 month later. Similar to PCI, the dTRA for EVT is safe and feasible without any specific complications in carefully selected patients.

Application of ultrasound in cardiovascular intervention via the distal radial artery approach: New wine in old bottles?

The distal radial artery (DRA) approach has emerged as a new approach in cardiovascular intervention. In recent years, ultrasound has been widely used in cardiovascular intervention via the DRA approach. This article systematically discusses the progress of ultrasound in the preoperative vascular assessment, intraoperative guided puncture and postoperative observation of complications via the DRA approach.

[Impact of femoral or radial approach on acute renal injury induced by repeated contrast medium in patients with coronary heart disease].

Objective: To investigate the effects of femoral approach versus radial approach on the incidence of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) in patients with coronary heart disease, who received twice contrast agents within a short interval. Methods: A total of 322 patients with coronary heart disease, who admitted to the General Hospital of Northern Theater Command from January 2010 to January 2015, were included in this retrospective analysis. All patients exposed to contrast agents twice within 30 days. The patients were divided into two groups according to the approach of interventional operation: radial artery group (n=235) and femoral artery group (n=87). Serum creatinine (SCr) values were detected at 48 and 72 hours post procedure. Endpoint events were CI-AKI, which was defined as SCr increased>0.5 mg/dl (44.2 µmol/L) or relative ratio ((postoperative SCr-preoperative SCr)/preoperative SCr×100%>25%) within 72 hours after contrast agent use after excluding other causes. Clinical characteristics and the incidence of CI-AKI were compared between the two groups, multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to detect the risk factors of postoperative CI-AKI in these patients. Results: The proportion of smoking, PCI history, STEMI patients and levels of fibrinogen, fasting blood glucose, troponin T was significantly higher in femoral artery group than in radial artery group (all P<0.05). The interval between two procedure sessions was significantly longer in the femoral artery group than in the radial artery group (P=0.001). The incidence of CI-AKI tended to be higher in femoral artery group than in radial artery group after the first operation (18.6% (16/87) vs. 11.9% (28/235), P=0.133). CI-AKI incidence after the second operation was similar between the two groups (P>0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that interventional approach was not an independent risk factor for postoperative CI-AKI in patients with coronary heart disease undergoing interventional procedures twice within 30 days (P>0.05);STEMI (OR=2.854, 95%CI 1.100-7.404, P=0.031) and diuretics use (OR=4.002, 95%CI 1.470-10.893, P=0.007) were independent risk factors for CI-AKI after the first operation. Conclusion: There is no correlation between the risk of CI-AKI and interventional approaches in patients with coronary heart disease who undergo interventional surgery twice within 30 days.

Multidisciplinary Management of Subclavian Artery Perforation and Complications.

The radial approach to cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary interventions has increased in popularity due to the favorable side effect profile relative to the femoral approach. Mediastinal hematoma after radial access cardiac catheterization has scarcely been reported in the literature and, if present, the exact location of the bleed was rarely identified. In this case presentation, we describe an elective transradial coronary angiography resulting in subclavian artery perforation in close proximity to the vertebral artery, with subsequent mediastinal and cervical hematoma formation. This scenario was managed by immediate imaging of the chest after sudden deterioration raised suspicion of an adverse event during wire navigation. Formation of a mediastinal hematoma is the equivalent of retroperitoneal bleed from the femoral approach and requires rapid recognition, interdisciplinary collaboration, and endovascular management.

Distal Radial Artery Access: The Future of Cardiovascular Intervention.

Access sites for coronary intervention have been changing over the last several decades, from the femoral artery to the radial artery and then to the distal radial artery. Distal radial access, which was first used in 2017 and is still not recommended by the guidelines, shows a higher success rate and less complications than other sites; therefore, it might be the future for cardiovascular intervention. In this study, we reviewed almost all of the articles that are related to the distal radial access, from 2017 to present, and summarized the technique, success rate, advantages, disadvantages, and noncardiac use of this access site.

Impact of femoral or radial approach on acute renal injury induced by repeated contrast medium in patients with coronary heart disease / 中华心血管病杂志

Objective: To investigate the effects of femoral approach versus radial approach on the incidence of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) in patients with coronary heart disease, who received twice contrast agents within a short interval. Methods: A total of 322 patients with coronary heart disease, who admitted to the General Hospital of Northern Theater Command from January 2010 to January 2015, were included in this retrospective analysis. All patients exposed to contrast agents twice within 30 days. The patients were divided into two groups according to the approach of interventional operation: radial artery group (n=235) and femoral artery group (n=87). Serum creatinine (SCr) values were detected at 48 and 72 hours post procedure. Endpoint events were CI-AKI, which was defined as SCr increased>0.5 mg/dl (44.2 μmol/L) or relative ratio ((postoperative SCr-preoperative SCr)/preoperative SCr×100%>25%) within 72 hours after contrast agent use after excluding other causes. Clinical characteristics and the incidence of CI-AKI were compared between the two groups, multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to detect the risk factors of postoperative CI-AKI in these patients. Results: The proportion of smoking, PCI history, STEMI patients and levels of fibrinogen, fasting blood glucose, troponin T was significantly higher in femoral artery group than in radial artery group (all P<0.05). The interval between two procedure sessions was significantly longer in the femoral artery group than in the radial artery group (P=0.001). The incidence of CI-AKI tended to be higher in femoral artery group than in radial artery group after the first operation (18.6% (16/87) vs. 11.9% (28/235), P=0.133). CI-AKI incidence after the second operation was similar between the two groups (P>0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that interventional approach was not an independent risk factor for postoperative CI-AKI in patients with coronary heart disease undergoing interventional procedures twice within 30 days (P>0.05);STEMI (OR=2.854, 95%CI 1.100-7.404, P=0.031) and diuretics use (OR=4.002, 95%CI 1.470-10.893, P=0.007) were independent risk factors for CI-AKI after the first operation. Conclusion: There is no correlation between the risk of CI-AKI and interventional approaches in patients with coronary heart disease who undergo interventional surgery twice within 30 days.

Partial splenic embolization of patients with hypersplenism by transradial or transfemoral approach: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Partial splenic artery embolization (PSE) is an effective treatment modality for patients with hypersplenism. It is less invasive and has a quicker recovery compared with surgical procedures. PSE is usually performed using a femoral artery approach that requires bedrest for a few hours, which is rarely the case for transradial PSE. PURPOSE: To compare the transradial and transfemoral approaches for embolization of spleen in patients with hypersplenism. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In all, 84 patients with hypersplenism who required PSE were recruited. They were randomly divided into two groups on the basis of the procedure followed: the transradial approach (R-PSE, n = 39) or transfemoral approach (F-PSE, n = 45). Technical success, puncture rate, total procedure time, X-ray exposure time, length of stay in hospital (LOS), and complications of the two groups were recorded. RESULTS: The procedure time, X-ray exposure time, and LOS were found to be lower in the R-PSE group than in the F-PSE. However, this difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The transradial artery approach for PSE in patients with hypersplenism is feasible with no major complications as compared to the femoral approach.

Advantages of a workbench reshaped AR1 mod catheter for right coronary angiography by right radial approach.

Transradial approach in cardiac catheterization is increasing. In daily practice, coronary angiography via radial artery is usually performed by using catheters designed for femoral approach. The aim of this study was to evaluate advantages in the use of a workbench reshaped AR1 mod catheter, in terms of procedural duration time, number of catheters per procedure, fluoroscopy time, contrast agent administered volume, images quality and costs. Two hundred patients, submitted to coronary angiography via right radial artery in our institution, have been retrospectively reviewed. Patients have been divided in two groups, depending on whether a workbench reshaped Cordis Amplatz AR1 mod catheter (rAR1 mod), or catheters in their original shape (OC) have been employed. In the rAR1 mod group (100 patients) a lower number of catheters per procedure (1.07 ± 0.25 vs. 1.47 ± 1.65; p < 0.001), a more frequent right coronary selective engagement (76.76% vs. 53.12%; p < 0.001), a smaller amount of contrast agent (63.02 ± 27.77 vs. 80.85 ± 29.22 ml, p < 0.001), a reduced fluoroscopy and global procedural time (4.19 ± 2.91 vs. 5.69 ± 3.85 min, p = 0.004; and 34.58 ± 17.05 vs. 42.58 ± 17.26 min, p = 0.001, respectively) were observed. According to our experience, when right coronary angiography via right radial approach is performed, the utilization of rAR1 mod catheter correlates with multiple advantages in terms of procedural parameters.