Utility of artificial intelligence for detection of pneumothorax on chest radiopgraphs done after transthoracic percutaneous transthoracic biopsy guided by computed tomography.

OBJETIVE: To assess the ability of an artificial intelligence software to detect pneumothorax in chest radiographs done after percutaneous transthoracic biopsy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We included retrospectively in our study adult patients who underwent CT-guided percutaneous transthoracic biopsies from lung, pleural or mediastinal lesions from June 2019 to June 2020, and who had a follow-up chest radiograph after the procedure. These chest radiographs were read to search the presence of pneumothorax independently by an expert thoracic radiologist and a radiodiagnosis resident, whose unified lecture was defined as the gold standard, and the result of each radiograph after interpretation by the artificial intelligence software was documented for posterior comparison with the gold standard. RESULTS: A total of 284 chest radiographs were included in the study and the incidence of pneumothorax was 14.4%. There were no discrepancies between the two readers' interpretation of any of the postbiopsy chest radiographs. The artificial intelligence software was able to detect 41/41 of the present pneumothorax, implying a sensitivity of 100% and a negative predictive value of 100%, with a specificity of 79.4% and a positive predictive value of 45%. The accuracy was 82.4%, indicating that there is a high probability that an individual will be adequately classified by the software. It has also been documented that the presence of Port-a-cath is the cause of 8 of the 50 of false positives by the software. CONCLUSIONS: The software has detected 100% of cases of pneumothorax in the postbiopsy chest radiographs. A potential use of this software could be as a prioritisation tool, allowing radiologists not to read immediately (or even not to read) chest radiographs classified as non-pathological by the software, with the confidence that there are no pathological cases.

The role of chest X-ray in the early diagnosis and staging of sarcoidosis: Is it really should be done?

BACKGROUND: Sarcoidosis is a chronic granulomatous disease characterized by non-caseating granuloma. The conventional chest X-ray (CXR) has important role in the diagnosis, staging and follow-up of disease. Computed tomography (CT) is a second-line imaging method used to determine the extent, complications and differential diagnosis of sarcoidosis. OBJECTIVES: To determine the role of CXR in the early diagnosis and staging of sarcoidosis and to compare with CT imaging. METHODS: One hundred and nine sarcoidosis patients followed at a single center were included in the study. Demographic, radiological, and clinical data of 81 patients were obtained from a total of 109 patients, and the record data of these 81 patients were evaluated. Patients who could not be reached for all tests were excluded from the study. CXR and CT imaging taken at diagnosis were evaluated retrospectively independently from two radiologists and one rheumatologist. RESULTS: Among 109 patients, eighty-one patients CXR and CT imaging taken at the same center has been reached. Among 81 sarcoidosis patients 23 (28.4%) were male, 58 (71.6%) were female. The mean patients age was 46.4 years and the mean disease duration was 3.8 years. CXR is regarded as normal at diagnosis in 30 patients (37%), while all of these patients had findings consistent with sarcoidosis on CT imaging. CT imaging are more superior than CXR in the early diagnosis and staging of sarcoidosis (p=0.001). Also CT imaging is more superior for detection of disease extent and complications. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we observed that CT imaging outperforms CXR in terms of early detection and staging of sarcoidosis. The use of CT imaging is important for early diagnosis and staging of sarcoidosis. The low performance of CXR is a condition that requires the discussion of this method. Multicenter prospective study is needed in this regard.

The role of chest X-ray in the early diagnosis and staging of sarcoidosis: Is it really should be done? / El papel de la radiografía de tórax en el diagnóstico precoz y estadificación de la sarcoidosis: ¿realmente se debe hacer?

Background: Sarcoidosis is a chronic granulomatous disease characterized by non-caseating granuloma. The conventional chest X-ray (CXR) has important role in the diagnosis, staging and follow-up of disease. Computed tomography (CT) is a second-line imaging method used to determine the extent, complications and differential diagnosis of sarcoidosis. Objectives: To determine the role of CXR in the early diagnosis and staging of sarcoidosis and to compare with CT imaging. Methods: One hundred and nine sarcoidosis patients followed at a single center were included in the study. Demographic, radiological, and clinical data of 81 patients were obtained from a total of 109 patients, and the record data of these 81 patients were evaluated. Patients who could not be reached for all tests were excluded from the study. CXR and CT imaging taken at diagnosis were evaluated retrospectively independently from two radiologists and one rheumatologist. Results: Among 109 patients, eighty-one patients CXR and CT imaging taken at the same center has been reached. Among 81 sarcoidosis patients 23 (28.4%) were male, 58 (71.6%) were female. The mean patients age was 46.4 years and the mean disease duration was 3.8 years. CXR is regarded as normal at diagnosis in 30 patients (37%), while all of these patients had findings consistent with sarcoidosis on CT imaging. CT imaging are more superior than CXR in the early diagnosis and staging of sarcoidosis (p=0.001). Also CT imaging is more superior for detection of disease extent and complications. Conclusions: In this study, we observed that CT imaging outperforms CXR in terms of early detection and staging of sarcoidosis. The use of CT imaging is important for early diagnosis and staging of sarcoidosis. The low performance of CXR is a condition that requires the discussion of this method. Multicenter prospective study is needed in this regard.(AU)

Antecedentes: La sarcoidosis es una enfermedad granulomatosa crónica caracterizada por un granuloma no caseificante. La radiografía de tórax convencional (CXR) tiene un papel importante en el diagnóstico, estadificación y seguimiento de la enfermedad. La tomografía computarizada (TC) es un método de imagen de segunda línea que se utiliza para determinar la extensión, las complicaciones y el diagnóstico diferencial de la sarcoidosis. Objetivos: Determinar el papel de la radiografía de tórax en el diagnóstico temprano y la estadificación de la sarcoidosis y compararlo con la tomografía computarizada. Métodos: Se incluyeron en el estudio 109 pacientes con sarcoidosis seguidos en un solo centro. Se obtuvieron datos demográficos, radiológicos y clínicos de 81 sujetos de un total de 109 pacientes, y se evaluaron los datos de registro de estos 81 individuos. Los pacientes que no pudieron ser contactados para todas las pruebas fueron excluidos del estudio. Las imágenes de CXR y CT tomadas en el momento del diagnóstico fueron evaluadas retrospectivamente de forma independiente por 2 radiólogos y un reumatólogo. Resultados: De un total de 109 pacientes se han obtenido imágenes de CXR y CT, tomadas en el mismo centro, de 81 individuos. De esos 81 pacientes con sarcoidosis 23 (28,4%) eran hombres y 58 (71,6%) eran mujeres. La edad media de los pacientes fue de 46,4 años y la duración media de la enfermedad fue de 3,8 años. La CXR se considera normal en el momento del diagnóstico en 30 pacientes (37%), mientras que todos estos pacientes tenían hallazgos consistentes con sarcoidosis en la TC. La TC es superior a la radiografía de tórax en el diagnóstico temprano y la estadificación de la sarcoidosis (p=0,001) y en la detección de la extensión de la enfermedad y las complicaciones. Conclusiones: En este estudio observamos que la TC supera a la radiografía de tórax en términos de detección temprana y estadificación de la sarcoidosis...(AU)

Rendimiento diagnóstico de algoritmos de inteligencia artificial para detección de compromiso pulmonar por COVID-19 basados en radiografía portátil / Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence algorithms for detection of pulmonary involvement by COVID-19 based on portable radiography

Introducción y objetivo: Evaluar el rendimiento diagnóstico de diferentes algoritmos de inteligencia artificial (IA) para la identificación de compromiso pulmonar por SARS-CoV-2 basados en radiografía (Rx) de tórax portátil.Material y métodoEstudio observacional prospectivo que incluyó pacientes ingresados por sospecha de infección por COVID-19 en un hospital universitario entre julio y noviembre de 2020. El patrón de referencia de compromiso pulmonar por SARS-CoV-2 comprendió una PCR positiva y síntomas respiratorios bajos.ResultadosSe incluyeron 493 pacientes, 140 (28%) con PCR positiva y 32 (7%) con neumonía por SARS-CoV-2. El algoritmo AI-B tuvo el mejor rendimiento diagnóstico (áreas bajo la curva ROC AI-B 0,73 vs. AI-A 0,51 vs. AI-C 0,57). Utilizando un umbral de detección superior al 55%. AI-B presentó mayor precisión que el especialista (área bajo la curva de 0,68 [IC 95%: 0,64-0,72] vs. 0,54 [IC 95%: 0,49-0,59]).ConclusiónLos algoritmos de IA basados en Rx portátiles permiten una precisión diagnóstica comparable a la humana para la detección de compromiso pulmonar por SARS-CoV-2. (AU)

Introduction and objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of different artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms for the identification of pulmonary involvement by SARS-CoV-2 based on portable chest radiography (RX).Material and methodsProspective observational study that included patients admitted for suspected COVID-19 infection in a university hospital between July and November 2020. The reference standard of pulmonary involvement by SARS-CoV-2 comprised a positive PCR test and low-tract respiratory symptoms.Results493 patients were included, 140 (28%) with positive PCR and 32 (7%) with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. The AI-B algorithm had the best diagnostic performance (areas under the ROC curve AI-B 0.73, vs. AI-A 0.51, vs. AI-C 0.57). Using a detection threshold greater than 55%, AI-B had greater diagnostic performance than the specialist [(area under the curve of 0.68 (95% CI 0.64-0.72), vs. 0.54 (95% CI 0.49-0.59)].ConclusionAI algorithms based on portable RX enabled a diagnostic performance comparable to human assessment for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 lung involvement. (AU)

[Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence algorithms for detection of pulmonary involvement by COVID-19 based on portable radiography]. / Rendimiento diagnóstico de algoritmos de inteligencia artificial para detección de compromiso pulmonar por COVID-19 basados en radiografía portátil.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of different artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms for the identification of pulmonary involvement by SARS-CoV-2 based on portable chest radiography (RX). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective observational study that included patients admitted for suspected COVID-19 infection in a university hospital between July and November 2020. The reference standard of pulmonary involvement by SARS-CoV-2 comprised a positive PCR test and low-tract respiratory symptoms. RESULTS: 493 patients were included, 140 (28%) with positive PCR and 32 (7%) with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. The AI-B algorithm had the best diagnostic performance (areas under the ROC curve AI-B 0.73, vs. AI-A 0.51, vs. AI-C 0.57). Using a detection threshold greater than 55%, AI-B had greater diagnostic performance than the specialist [(area under the curve of 0.68 (95% CI 0.64-0.72), vs. 0.54 (95% CI 0.49-0.59)]. CONCLUSION: AI algorithms based on portable RX enabled a diagnostic performance comparable to human assessment for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 lung involvement.

Lesiones residuales en radiografía simple de tórax tras neumonía por SARS-CoV-2: identificación de factores de riesgo / Residual lesions on chest-Xray after SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia: Identification of risk factors

Introducción:La neumonía por la enfermedad por el coronavirus 19 (COVID-19) es la manifestación clínica más frecuente de esta afección, siendo aún desconocidas sus secuelas a largo plazo y la posible evolución a fibrosis pulmonar. El objetivo de este trabajo es una revisión a medio plazo de las secuelas en la radiografía simple de tórax (RxTx) de pacientes con diagnóstico previo de neumonía por la COVID-19.Pacientes y métodos:Revisión retrospectiva de pacientes con diagnóstico de neumonía por la COVID-19 en la que hemos valorado la persistencia de lesiones residuales en la RxTx de control y hemos analizado su posible relación con factores epidemiológicos, factores de riesgo, tratamientos recibidos y patrones radiológicos iniciales.Resultados:Se analizan 143 pacientes (52 mujeres y 91 hombres), con una edad media de 64 años. Se objetivó una resolución completa radiológica en 104 (73%) y resolución parcial en 39 (27%). De los factores de riesgo solo la edad se relacionó significativamente con la persistencia de lesiones residuales (OR: 1,06; IC 95%: 1,02-1,10). En relación con los tratamientos se encontraron diferencias significativas con el tocilizumab y los glucocorticoides, donde los pacientes tratados tenían más riesgo de lesiones residuales (OR 2,44 [1,03; 5,80] y 3,05 [1;43; 6,51]) respectivamente. En el análisis de los patrones radiológicos se observaron diferencias significativas en los pacientes que presentaban en la evolución aguda condensaciones periféricas y un patrón de empeoramiento radiológico precoz. Se evidenció una disociación clínico-radiológica: de los pacientes con lesiones residuales un 83% no tenía síntomas respiratorios.Discusión:Las neumonías por la COVID-19 pueden tener una resolución radiológica más lenta en pacientes de mayor edad y con ciertos patrones radiológicos iniciales, pero el desarrollo de fibrosis pulmonar en estos pacientes es un hecho aún cuestionable. (AU)

Introduction:COVID-19 pneumonia is the most frequent clinical manifestation of this disease, and its long-term sequelae and possible progression to pulmonary fibrosis are still unknown. The aim of this study is a mid-term review of the sequelae on plain chest radiography (CXR) in patients with a previous diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia.Patients and methods:Retrospective review of patients with a diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia, assessing the persistence of residual lesions in the control CXR and analysing their possible relationship with epidemiological factors, risk factors, treatments received and initial radiological patterns.Results:A total of 143 patients (52 women and 91 men) were analysed. Mean age was 64 years. Radiological complete resolution (CR) was observed in 104 (73%) and partial resolution (PR) in 39 (27%). Of the risk factors only age was significantly related to persistence of residual lesions (OR 1.06 CI 95% (1.02,1.10). In relation to treatments, significant differences were found with tocilizumab and glucocorticoids, where treated patients had a higher risk of residual lesions (OR 2.44 (1.03,5.80) and 3.05(1.43,6.51) respectively. In the analysis of radiological patterns, significant differences were observed in patients with peripheral condensations in the acute course and a pattern of early radiological worsening. A clinical-radiological dissociation was evident: 83% of patients with residual lesions had no respiratory symptoms.Discussion:COVID19 pneumonias may have a slower radiological resolution in older patients with certain initial radiological patterns, but the development of pulmonary fibrosis in these patients is still questionable. (AU)

[Residual lesions on chest-Xray after SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia: Identification of risk factors]. / Lesiones residuales en radiografía simple de tórax tras neumonía por SARS-CoV-2: identificación de factores de riesgo.

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 pneumonia is the most frequent clinical manifestation of this disease, and its long-term sequelae and possible progression to pulmonary fibrosis are still unknown. The aim of this study is a mid-term review of the sequelae on plain chest radiography (CXR) in patients with a previous diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of patients with a diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia, assessing the persistence of residual lesions in the control CXR and analysing their possible relationship with epidemiological factors, risk factors, treatments received and initial radiological patterns. RESULTS: A total of 143 patients (52 women and 91 men) were analysed. Mean age was 64 years. Radiological complete resolution (CR) was observed in 104 (73%) and partial resolution (PR) in 39 (27%). Of the risk factors only age was significantly related to persistence of residual lesions (OR 1.06 CI 95% (1.02,1.10). In relation to treatments, significant differences were found with tocilizumab and glucocorticoids, where treated patients had a higher risk of residual lesions (OR 2.44 (1.03,5.80) and 3.05(1.43,6.51) respectively. In the analysis of radiological patterns, significant differences were observed in patients with peripheral condensations in the acute course and a pattern of early radiological worsening. A clinical-radiological dissociation was evident: 83% of patients with residual lesions had no respiratory symptoms. DISCUSSION: COVID19 pneumonias may have a slower radiological resolution in older patients with certain initial radiological patterns, but the development of pulmonary fibrosis in these patients is still questionable.

Pectus excavatum em uma ninhada de Buldogue Francês: relato de caso / Pectus excavatum in a French Bulldog Litter: case report

RESUMO O pectus excavatum é considerado uma patologia da parede torácica, onde há convexidade no aspecto ventral do esterno, o que gera complicações secundárias, como alongamento ventrodorsal do tórax e aumento da pressão intratorácica, entre outras. No presente caso, o corpo de um cachorro Buldogue Francês nasceu com sinais prévios de decaimento e baixo consumo de leito materno, além de uma avaliação médica forense. De acordo com a avaliação patológica, foi encontrada uma fenda no peito esternal relacionada às esternas caudais próximas à cartilagem xifóide, conteúdo espumoso na cartilagem epiglótica da laringe e sinais graves de enfisema nos lobos caudal, craniano e médio pulmonar. Na avaliação cardiológica, foi observada assimetria morfológica invaginante no septo interventricular na mesma área em que a fenda esternal ocorre, por sua vez, na avaliação radiográfica, evidencia uma depressão dorsal do terço caudal do esterno com alterações consideráveis na silhueta cardíaca. Na Colômbia não há relatos de ninhadas completas que apresentem esta alteração, portanto, pretende-se que este seja o primeiro relatório anatomopatológico e de imagem que descreva a patologia em caninos.

ABSTRACT Pectus excavatum is considered a pathology of the chest wall where there is convexity in the ventral aspect of the sternum, which generates secondary complications, such as ventrodorsal stretching of the chest and increased intrathoracic pressure, among others. In the present case, the body of a French bulldog dog was born with previous signs of decay and low consumption of maternal waste, in addition to a forensic medical evaluation. According to the pathological evaluation, a crack was found in the sternal chest related to the caudal sternum close to the xiphoid cartilage, frothy content in the laryngeal epiglottis cartilage and severe signs of emphysema in the caudal, cranial and middle lung lobes. In the cardiological evaluation, an invaginating morphological asymmetry was observed in the interventricular septum in the same area in which the sternal cleft occurs, in turn, in the radiographic evaluation, it shows a dorsal depression of the caudal third of the sternum with considerable changes in the cardiac silhouette. In Colombia there are no reports of complete litters that present this alteration, so it is intended that this is the first anatomopathological and imaging report that describes the pathology in canines.

Usefulness of chest X-rays for evaluating prognosis in patients with COVID-19.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The pandemia caused by SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) has been a diagnostic challenge in which chest X-rays have had a key role. This study aimed to determine whether the Radiological Scale for Evaluating Hospital Admission (RSEHA) applied to chest X-rays of patients with COVID-19 when they present at the emergency department is related with the severity of COVID-19 in terms of the need for admission to the hospital, the need for admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), and/or mortality. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 292 patients with COVID-19 who presented at the emergency department between March 16, 2020 and April 30, 2020. To standardize the radiologic patterns, we used the RSEHA, categorizing the radiologic pattern as mild, moderate, or severe. We analyzed the relationship between radiologic severity according to the RSEHA with the need for admission to the hospital, admission to the ICU, and mortality. RESULTS: Hospital admission was necessary in 91.4% of the patients. The RSEHA was significantly associated with the need for hospital admission (p = 0.03) and with the need for ICU admission (p < 0.001). A total of 51 (17.5%) patients died; of these, 57% had the severe pattern on the RSEHA. When we analyzed mortality by grouping patients according to their results on the RSEHA and their age range, the percentage of patients who died increased after age 70 years in patients classified as moderate or severe on the RSEHA. CONCLUSIONS: Chest X-rays in patients with COVID-19 obtained in the emergency department are useful for determining the prognosis in terms of admission to the hospital, admission to the ICU, and mortality; radiologic patterns categorized as severe on the RSEHA are associated with greater mortality and admission to the ICU.

COVID-19 pneumonia: Relationship between initial chest X-rays and laboratory findings.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the initial findings in chest X-rays of patients with RT-PCR positive for SARS-CoV-2, and to determine whether there is a relationship between the severity of these findings and the clinical and laboratory findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed the relationship between initial chest X-rays and initial laboratory tests in symptomatic adults with nasopharyngeal RT-PCR results positive for SARS-CoV-2 seen at our center between February 29 and March 23, 2020. Among other radiologic findings, we analyzed ground-glass opacities, consolidations, linear opacities, and pleural effusion. We also used a scale of radiologic severity to assess the distribution and extent of these findings. Among initial laboratory findings, we analyzed leukocytes, lymphocytes, platelets, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and C-reactive protein. RESULTS: Of 761 symptomatic patients, 639 (84%) required hospitalization and 122 were discharged to their homes. The need for admission increased with increasing scores on the scale of radiologic severity. The extent of initial lung involvement was significantly associated with the laboratory parameters analyzed (P<.05 for platelets, P<.01 for lymphocytes, and P<.001 for the remaining parameters), as well as with the time from the onset of symptoms (P<.001). CONCLUSION: It can be useful to use a scale of radiologic severity to classify chest X-ray findings in diagnosing patients with COVID-19, because the greater the radiologic severity, the greater the need for hospitalization and the greater the alteration in laboratory parameters.

COVID-19 pneumonia: relationship between initial chest X-rays and laboratory findings. / Neumonía COVID-19: relación entre la radiografía de tórax inicial y los datos analíticos.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the initial findings in chest X-rays of patients with RT-PCR positive for SARS-CoV-2, and to determine whether there is a relationship between the severity of these findings and the clinical and laboratory findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed the relationship between initial chest X-rays and initial laboratory tests in symptomatic adults with nasopharyngeal RT-PCR results positive for SARS-CoV-2 seen at our center between February 29 and March 23, 2020. Among other radiologic findings, we analyzed ground-glass opacities, consolidations, linear opacities, and pleural effusion. We also used a scale of radiologic severity to assess the distribution and extent of these findings. Among initial laboratory findings, we analyzed leukocytes, lymphocytes, platelets, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and C-reactive protein. RESULTS: Of 761 symptomatic patients, 639 (84%) required hospitalization and 122 were discharged to their homes. The need for admission increased with increasing scores on the scale of radiologic severity. The extent of initial lung involvement was significantly associated with the laboratory parameters analyzed (p<0.05 for platelets, p<0.01 for lymphocytes, and p<0.001 for the remaining parameters), as well as with the time from the onset of symptoms (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: It can be useful to use a scale of radiologic severity to classify chest X-ray findings in diagnosing patients with COVID-19, because the greater the radiologic severity, the greater the need for hospitalization and the greater the alteration in laboratory parameters.

Initial findings in chest X-rays as predictors of worsening lung infection in patients with COVID-19: correlation in 265 patients.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We aimed to analyze the relationship between the initial chest X-ray findings in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome due to infection with SARS-CoV-2 and eventual clinical worsening and to compare three systems of quantifying these findings. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective study reviewed the clinical and radiological evolution of 265 adult patients with COVID-19 attended at our center between March 2020 and April 2020. We recorded data related to patients' comorbidities, hospital stay, and clinical worsening (admission to the ICU, intubation, and death). We used three scoring systems taking into consideration 6 or 8 lung fields (designated 6A, 6B, and 8) to quantify lung involvement in each patient's initial pathological chest X-ray and to classify its severity as mild, moderate, or severe, and we compared these three systems. We also recorded the presence of alveolar opacities and linear opacities (fundamentally linear atelectasis) in the first chest X-ray with pathologic findings. RESULTS: In the χ2 analysis, moderate or severe involvement in the three classification systems correlated with hospital admission (P = .009 in 6A, P = .001 in 6B, and P = .001 in 8) and with death (P = .02 in 6A, P = .01 in 6B, and P = .006 in 8). In the regression analysis, the most significant associations were 6B with alveolar involvement (OR 2.3; 95%CI 1.1.-4.7; P = .025;) and 8 with alveolar involvement (OR 2.07; 95% CI 1.01.-4.25; P = .046). No differences were observed in the ability of the three systems to predict clinical worsening by classifications of involvement in chest X-rays as moderate or severe. CONCLUSION: Moderate/severe extension in the three chest X-ray scoring systems evaluating the extent of involvement over 6 or 8 lung fields and the finding of alveolar opacities in the first pathologic X-ray correlated with mortality and the rate of hospitalization in the patients studied. No significant difference was found in the predictive ability of the three classification systems proposed.

Usefulness of chest X-rays for evaluating prognosis in patients with COVID-19. / Utilidad de la radiografía de tórax para evaluar el pronóstico de pacientes con COVID-19.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The pandemia caused by SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) has been a diagnostic challenge in which chest X-rays have had a key role. This study aimed to determine whether the Radiological Scale for Evaluating Hospital Admission (RSEHA) applied to chest X-rays of patients with COVID-19 when they present at the emergency department is related with the severity of COVID-19 in terms of the need for admission to the hospital, the need for admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), and/or mortality. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 292 patients with COVID-19 who presented at the emergency department between March 16, 2020 and April 30, 2020. To standardize the radiologic patterns, we used the RSEHA, categorizing the radiologic pattern as mild, moderate, or severe. We analyzed the relationship between radiologic severity according to the RSEHA with the need for admission to the hospital, admission to the ICU, and mortality. RESULTS: Hospital admission was necessary in 91.4% of the patients. The RSEHA was significantly associated with the need for hospital admission (p=0.03) and with the need for ICU admission (p<0.001). A total of 51 (17.5%) patients died; of these, 57% had the severe pattern on the RSEHA. When we analyzed mortality by grouping patients according to their results on the RSEHA and their age range, the percentage of patients who died increased after age 70 years in patients classified as moderate or severe on the RSEHA. CONCLUSIONS: Chest X-rays in patients with COVID-19 obtained in the emergency department are useful for determining the prognosis in terms of admission to the hospital, admission to the ICU, and mortality; radiologic patterns categorized as severe on the RSEHA are associated with greater mortality and admission to the ICU.

Hallazgos radiográficos asociados a la COVID-19: una mirada desde la atención primaria / Radiographic findings associated with the COVID-19: a glance from the primary health care

La actual pandemia de COVID-19 ha afectado múltiples sectores económicos y sociales a escala mundial, con especial afectación sobre el sector de la salud, ya que constituye un reto adicional para la atención primaria, dada la marcada escasez de recursos. La infección por SARS-CoV-2 ocasiona morbilidad y mortalidad crecientes, por lo que el diagnóstico mediante imágenes es una herramienta imprescindible en la práctica clínica; sin embargo, el acceso limitado a algunos medios como la tomografía axial computarizada en diferentes niveles de atención, justifica el uso de la radiografía de tórax como una opción costo-efectiva y accesible en muchas regiones. En el presente artículo se exponen los hallazgos asociados a procesos infecciosos virales sugestivos de infección por el nuevo coronavirus y una serie de escalas de clasificación que buscan estandarizar la lectura e interpretación radiográfica por parte del personal médico.

The pandemic of COVID-19 has affected multiple economic and social sectors worldwide, with special effects on the health sector, since it constitutes an additional challenge for the primary health care, given the marked lack of resources. The infection due to SARS-CoV-2 causes increasing morbidity and mortality, reason why the diagnosis by means of images is an indispensable tool in the clinical practice; however, the limited access to some means as the computerized axial tomography in different levels of care, justifies the use of the thorax x-ray as a cost-effective and accessible option in many regions. Findings associated with suggestive viral infectious processes of infection due to the new coronavirus and a series of classification scales that seek to standardize reading and radiographic interpretation by the medical staff are exposed in this work.

Radiological management and follow-up of post-COVID-19 patients. / Manejo y seguimiento radiológico del paciente post-COVID-19.

Most of the patients who overcome the SARS-CoV-2 infection do not present complications and do not require a specific follow-up, but a significant proportion (especially those with moderate / severe clinical forms of the disease) require clinicalradiological follow-up. Although there are hardly any references or clinical guidelines regarding the long-term follow-up of post-COVID-19 patients, radiological exams are being performed and monographic surveillance consultations are being set up in most of the hospitals to meet their needs. The purpose of this work is to share our experience in the management of the post-COVID-19 patient in two institutions thathave had a high incidence of COVID-19 and to propose general follow-uprecommendations from a clinical and radiological perspective.

Pediatric chest X-rays during the COVID-19 pandemic. / Radiografía de tórax pediátrica en la era COVID.

BACKGROUND: An infectious disease caused by a new type of coronavirus that can manifest as an acute respiratory infection was discovered in China in mid-December 2019 and soon spread throughout the country and to the rest of the world. Although chest X-rays are the initial imaging technique of choice for low respiratory infections with or without dyspnea, few articles have reported the radiologic findings in children with COVID-19. OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical, laboratory, and chest X-ray findings in pediatric patients with signs and symptoms of respiratory infection attended at our hospital in March 2020. To analyze the frequency of COVID-19 compared to other respiratory infections, and to describe the radiologic manifestations of COVID-19 in pediatric patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This cross-sectional observational study included all children with clinical manifestations of respiratory infection (fever, rhinorrhea, cough, and/or dyspnea) that required chest X-rays in our hospital between March 1 and March 31. RESULTS: A total of 231 pediatric patients (90 (39%) girls and 141 (61%) boys; mean age, 4 y, range 1 month - 16 years) underwent chest X-rays for suspected respiratory infections. Most (88.4%) had mild symptoms; 29.9% had a family member positive for COVID-19 with symptoms similar to those of the patient. Nasal and/or throat swabs were analyzed for SARS-CoV-2 with PCR in the 47 (20.3%) children who presented at the emergency department; 3 (6.3%) of these were positive. Microbiological analyses were done in 85 (36.8%) of all patients, finding infections due to pathogens other than SARS-CoV-2 in 30 (35.3%). One of the patients with a PCR positive for SARS-CoV-2 had urine infection due to E. coli and blood culture positive for S. viridans. Abnormalities were observed on X-rays in 73.2% of the patients. Peribronchial thickening was the most common abnormal finding, observed in 57% of patients. Parenchymal consolidations were observed in 38.5%, being bilateral in 29.2% and associated with pleural effusion in 3.3%. The interstitial lines were thickened in 7.3%, and 7.3% had ground-glass opacities. CONCLUSION: During March 2020, COVID-19 and other symptomatic respiratory infections were observed. The radiologic pattern of these infections is nonspecific, and chest X-rays alone are insufficient for the diagnosis. Children with clinical manifestations compatible with COVID-19 (with or without PCR confirmation of infection by SARS-CoV-2) had mild symptoms and most did not require admission or invasive mechanical ventilation. In a context of community transmission, the absence of a known epidemiological antecedent should not be a contraindication for PCR to detect SARS-CoV-2.

Factores asociados a hallazgos anormales en radiografías digitales de tórax en trabajadores asintomáticos en Lima, Perú / Factors associated with abnormal findings on digital chest radiographs in asymptomatic workers in Lima, Peru

RESUMEN Introducción : La radiografía posteroanterior (PA) de tórax es utilizada rutinariamente como examen complementario en la evaluación de trabajadores. Sin embargo, existe la controversia sobre su indicación y utilidad en todos los trabajadores. El presente estudio tuvo como objetivo describir los factores asociados a hallazgos anormales en radiografías digitales de tórax en trabajadores sin síntomas respiratorios. Materiales y métodos : Se realizó un estudio observacional transversal analítico, utilizando registros de placas radiografías digitales de tórax PA de 24 069 trabajadores asintomáticos respiratorios, evaluados en un establecimiento de salud acreditado para la realización de exámenes médicos ocupacionales en el Perú, entre los años 2016 - 2019. Resultados : De los 24 069 trabajadores asintomáticos, 1166 (4,84 % IC 95 % [4,58 - 5,12]) presentaron radiografía anormal. Los principales hallazgos se encontraron en el parénquima pulmonar y de estas, las imágenes secuelares de tuberculosis fueron las más frecuentes. Se observó que los trabajadores mayores de 50 años (RP(a) = 6,34 IC 95 % [1,68 - 2,01]), los que presentaron bajo peso (RP(a) = 2,71 IC 95 % [1,88 - 3,91]) y los que tuvieron antecedentes patológicos pulmonares (RP(a) = 6,19 IC 95 % [5,54 - 6,91]) presentaron mayor probabilidad de presentar anormalidades en la radiografía pulmonar. Conclusiones : Debido a la baja frecuencia de radiografías digitales anormales de tórax, creemos que no resulta de utilidad como detección precoz de patología respiratoria en la población estudiada y que debería considerarse en trabajadores mayores de 50 años, con antecedente de enfermedad respiratoria y/o con bajo peso. Es importante realizar mayor cantidad de estudios que confirmen nuestros resultados.

ABSTRACT Introduction : Posteroanterior Chest X-Ray (CXR) is usually performed as a routine exam for workers' health surveillance, but their benefits are discussed and controversial. Our investigation described the associated factors with abnormal digital CXR in workers without respiratory symptoms. Materials and methods : An analytical cross-sectional observational study was performed, including 24 069 digital CXR obtained from workers without respiratory symptoms who performed their workers' health surveillance at an accredited occupational health center in Lima, Perú, from 2016 to 2019. Results : Of the 24 069 asymptomatic workers, 1166 (4.84 %, 95 % CI [4.58-5.12]) had abnormal radiography. The main findings were found in the lung parenchyma and of these, sequential images of tuberculosis were the most frequent. It was observed that workers older than 50 years (RP(a) = 6.34, 95 % CI [1.68 - 2.01]), those with low weight (RP(a) = 2.71 95 % CI [1.88 - 3.91]) and those with a history of pulmonary pathology (RP(a) = 6.19 95 % CI [5.54 - 6.91]) were more likely to have abnormalities on pulmonary radiography. Conclusions : Due to the low frequency of abnormal digital Chest X-Ray (CXR), it is not useful as an early detection of respiratory pathology in the population studied, however it should be considered in those over 50 years with a history of respiratory disease and/or low weight. It is important to carry out more studies that confirm our results.

Radiologic diagnosis of patients with COVID-19. / Diagnóstico radiológico del paciente con COVID-19.

The pandemia caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus has triggered an unprecedented health and economic crisis. Although the diagnosis of infection with SARS-CoV-2 is microbiological, imaging techniques play an important role in supporting the diagnosis, grading the severity of disease, guiding treatment, detecting complications, and evaluating the response to treatment. The lungs are the main organ involved, and chest X-rays, whether obtained in conventional X-ray suites or with portable units, are the first-line imaging test because they are widely available and economical. Chest CT is more sensitive than plain chest X-rays, and CT studies make it possible to identify complications in addition to pulmonary involvement, as well as to suggestive alternative diagnoses. The most common radiologic findings in COVID-19 are airspace opacities (consolidations and/or ground-glass opacities), which are typically bilateral, peripheral, and located primarily in the lower fields.

[The chest x-ray in acute bronchiolitis: Technical quality, findings, and an assessment of its reliability]. / La radiografía de tórax en la bronquiolitis aguda: calidad técnica, hallazgos y evaluación de su fiabilidad.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the recommendations of the current Clinical Practice Guidelines, the chest x-ray continues to be a widely used diagnostic test in the assessment of infants with acute bronchiolitis (AB). However, there have not been many studies that have assessed its reproducibility in these patients. In the present study, an evaluation is made on the radiographs, describing their quality, their radiological findings, and provides new evidence on the agreement between observers. METHOD: Out of a total of 281 infants admitted due to acute bronchiolitis, 140 chest x-rays were performed. Twelve doctors from different specialities evaluated the presence or absence of 10 radiological signs previously agreed by consensus. The level of agreement between 2 observers, and in groups of 3 or more, were analysed using the Cohen and Fleiss kappa index, respectively. RESULTS: Only 8.5% of the radiographs showed evidence of a complicated AB. The between-observer agreement in groups of 3 or more was medium, and with little variability (kappa: 0.20-0.40). However, between 2 observers, each observer against radiologist, the variability was wider, (kappa: -0.20-0.60). This level of agreement was associated with factors including, the sign to evaluate, the medical specialty, and level of professional experience. CONCLUSION: The low levels of agreement between observers and the wide variability, makes the chest x-ray an unreliable diagnostic tool, and is not recommended for the assessment of infants with AB.