Analysis of pre-admission risk factors for unplanned reintubation in geriatric trauma patients.

INTRODUCTION: Reintubation in unplanned scenarios, carries inherent risks and potential complications particularly in vulnerable populations such as geriatric trauma patients. We sought to identify preadmission risk factors for unplanned re-intubation (URI) in geriatric trauma patients and its effects on outcomes. METHODS: Analysis of TQIP (2017-2019) of intubated geriatric trauma patients, classified into two groups, those who were successfully extubated and those who required URI. We used logistic regression to assess for preadmission risk factors of URI. RESULTS: Among 23,572 patients, 20.2 â€‹% underwent URI. URI had higher mortality (13.7%vs.8.1 â€‹%, p â€‹< â€‹0.001), in-hospital complications (p â€‹< â€‹0.05), longer hospital and ICU LOS (p â€‹< â€‹0.001 for both). Higher age (OR â€‹= â€‹1.017), smoking (OR â€‹= â€‹1.418), CRF(OR â€‹= â€‹1.414), COPD (OR â€‹= â€‹1.410), alcohol use (OR â€‹= â€‹1.365), functionally dependent health status (OR â€‹= â€‹1.339), and anticoagulant use (OR â€‹= â€‹1.148), increased the risks of URI (p â€‹< â€‹0.05 for all). CONCLUSION: Geriatric patients with comorbidities including age, smoking, CRF, COPD, alcohol use, dependent status, and anticoagulant use are at higher risks of URI that could in turn, be associated with increased rates of mortality, complications, and longer hospital and ICU length of stay. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III retrospective study.

Ultrasound evaluation of cardiac and diaphragmatic function at different positions during a spontaneous breathing trial predicting extubation outcomes: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The ratio (E/Ea) of mitral Doppler inflow velocity to annular tissue Doppler wave velocity by transthoracic echocardiography and diaphragmatic excursion (DE) by diaphragm ultrasound have been confirmed to predict extubation outcomes. However, few studies focused on the predicting value of E/Ea and DE at different positions during a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT), as well as the effects of △E/Ea and △DE (changes in E/Ea and DE during a SBT). METHODS: This study was a reanalysis of the data of 60 difficult-to-wean patients in a previous study published in 2017. All eligible participants were organized into respiratory failure (RF) group and extubation success (ES) group within 48 h after extubation, or re-intubation (RI) group and non-intubation (NI) group within 1 week after extubation. The risk factors for respiratory failure and re-intubation including E/Ea and △E/Ea, DE and △DE at different positions were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression, respectively. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of E/Ea (septal, lateral, average) and DE (right, left, average) were compared with each other, respectively. RESULTS: Of the 60 patients, 29 cases developed respiratory failure within 48 h, and 14 of those cases required re-intubation within 1 week. Multivariate logistic regression showed that E/Ea were all associated with respiratory failure, while only DE (right) and DE (average) after SBT were related to re-intubation. There were no statistic differences among the ROC curves of E/Ea at different positions, nor between the ROC curves of DE. No statistical differences were shown in △E/Ea between RF and ES groups, while △DE (average) was remarkably higher in NI group than that in RI group. However, multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that △DE (average) was not associated with re-intubation. CONCLUSIONS: E/Ea at different positions during a SBT could predict postextubation respiratory failure with no statistical differences among them. Likewise, only DE (right) and DE (average) after SBT might predict re-intubation with no statistical differences between each other.

Effect of Reintubation Within 48 Hours on Mortality in Critically Ill Patients After Planned Extubation.

BACKGROUND: Re-intubation is necessary in 2% to 30% of cases of patients receiving a planned extubation. This procedure is associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation, a greater need for tracheostomy, a higher incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia, and higher mortality. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of re-intubation within 48 h on mortality after planned extubation by using a randomized controlled trial database. METHODS: Secondary analysis of a multi-center randomized trial, which evaluated the effect of reconnection to mechanical ventilation for 1 h after a successful spontaneous breathing trial, followed by extubation. The study included adult subjects who received invasive mechanical ventilation for > 12 h. The subjects were divided into an extubation failure group and an extubation success group. The outcome was in-hospital mortality. Two multivariate logistic regression models were constructed to identify independent factors associated with mortality. RESULTS: Among the 336 subjects studied, extubation failed in 52 (15.4%) and they were re-intubated within 48 h. Most re-intubations occurred between 12 and 24 h after planned extubation (median [interquartile range] 16 [6-36] h). Mortality of the extubation failure group was higher both in the ICU (32.6% vs 6.6%; odds ratio [OR] 6.77, 95% CI 3.22-14.24; P < .001) and in-hospital (42.3% vs 14.0%; OR 4.47, 95% CI 2.34-8.51; P < .001) versus the extubation success group. Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that re-intubation within 48 h was independently associated with both ICU mortality (OR 6.10, 95% CI 2.84-13.07; P < .001) and in-hospital mortality (OR 3.36, 95% CI 1.67-6.73; P = .001). In-hospital mortality was also associated with rescue noninvasive ventilation after extubation (OR 2.44, 95% CI 1.25-4.75; P = .009). CONCLUSIONS: Re-intubation within 48 h after planned extubation was associated with mortality in subjects who were critically ill.

Risk Factors and Outcomes Associated With Re-Intubation Secondary to Respiratory Failure in Patients With COVID-19 ARDS.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 is associated with variable symptoms and clinical sequelae. Studies have examined the clinical course of these patients, finding a prolonged need for invasive ventilation and variable re-intubation rates. However, no research has investigated factors and outcomes related to re-intubation secondary to respiratory failure among patients with COVID-19 with ARDS. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, retrospective study on subjects intubated for ARDS secondary to COVID-19. The primary outcome was re-intubation status; secondary outcomes were hospital and ICU stay and mortality. Data were analyzed using between-group comparisons using chi-square testing for categorical information and Student t test for quantitative data. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine factors related to re-intubation and mortality as dependent variables. RESULTS: One hundred and fourteen subjects were included, of which 32% required re-intubation. No between-group differences were detected for most demographic variables or comorbidities. No differences were detected in COVID-19 treatments, noninvasive respiratory support, mechanical circulatory support, or duration of ventilation. Midazolam (odds ratio [OR] 5.55 [95% CI 1.83-16.80], P = .002), fentanyl (OR 3.64 [95% CI 1.26-10.52], P = .02), and APACHE II scores (OR 1.08 [95% CI 1.030-1.147], P = .005) were independently associated with re-intubation (area under the curve = 0.81). Re-intubated subjects had extended hospital (36.7 ± 22.7 d vs 26.1 ± 12.1 d, P = .01) and ICU (29.6 ± 22.4 d vs 15.8 ± 10.4 d, P < .001) stays. More subjects died who failed extubation (49% vs 3%, P < .001). Age (OR 1.07 [95% CI 1.02-1.23], P = .005), male sex (OR 4.9 [95% CI 1.08-22.35], P = .041), positive Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) (OR 5.43 [95% CI 1.58-18.62], P = .007), and re-intubation (OR 12.75 [95% CI 2.80-57.10], P < .001) were independently associated with death (area under the curve = 0.93). CONCLUSIONS: Midazolam, fentanyl, and higher APACHE II scores were independently associated with re-intubation secondary to respiratory failure in subjects with COVID-19-related ARDS. Furthermore, age, male sex, positive CAM-ICU, and re-intubation were independently associated with mortality. Re-intubation also correlated with prolonged hospital and ICU stay.

Effect of high-flow nasal cannula versus non-invasive ventilation in preventing re-intubation in high-risk chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: A randomised controlled trial.

Background: Currently, a high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) has been shown to improve extubation outcomes. However, there is a lack of evidence on the utilisation of HFNC in high-risk chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of HFNC versus non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in preventing re-intubation following planned extubation in high-risk COPD patients. Patients and Methods: In this prospective, randomised, controlled trial, 230 mechanically ventilated COPD patients at high risk for re-intubation who fulfilled the criteria for planned extubation were enrolled. Post-extubation blood gases and vital signs at 1, 24, and 48 hours were recorded. The primary outcome was the re-intubation rate within 72 hours. Secondary outcomes included post-extubation respiratory failure, respiratory infection, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, and mortality rate at 60 days. Results: 230 patients after planned extubation were randomly allocated to receive either HFNC (n = 120) or NIV (n = 110). Re-intubation within 72 hours was significantly lower in the high-flow group: 8 patients (6.6%) versus 23 patients (20.9%) in the NIV group {absolute difference, 14.3% [95% confidence interval (CI), 10.9-16.3]; P = 0.001}. The frequency of post-extubation respiratory failure was less in patients assigned to HFNC than in those allocated NIV (25% vs. 35.4%) [absolute difference, 10.4% (95% CI, 2.4-14.3); P = 0.001]. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding reasons for respiratory failure after extubation. It was observed that the 60-day mortality rate was lower in patients who received HFNC than in those assigned to NIV (5% vs. 13.6%) [absolute difference, 8.6 (95% CI, 4.3 to 9.10); P = 0.001]. Conclusion: The use of HFNC after extubation appears to be superior to NIV in reducing the risk of re-intubation within 72 hours and 60-day mortality in high-risk COPD patients.

Postoperative Pulmonary Complications and Perioperative Strategies: A Systematic Review.

The occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) is frequently observed and has been linked to elevated levels of morbidity and mortality, which have adverse effects on both clinical and financial outcomes in healthcare settings. This systematic review aims to present the evidence that supports our comprehension of PPCs and emphasize the circumstances that necessitate the use of postoperative noninvasive ventilation (PNIV) or re-intubation with postoperative mechanical ventilation (POMV). A search was conducted on the National Library of Medicine's Pubmed database and Cochrane Library until November 29, 2020, to find published reports of randomized control trials (RCTs) that assessed postoperative pulmonary complications. Data related to the prevalence of PPCs and the use of PNIV, POMV, and length of hospital stay were extracted from all the studies. For the analysis, a total of 13 studies involving 6,609 patients were included, and out of these, four RCTs reported statistically significant results. The use of protective lung ventilation (PLV) with low tidal volume and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) during intraoperative ventilation, along with pressure-controlled (PCV) ventilation, as well as the postoperative ventilation strategy of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) combined with standard oxygen therapy were the only techniques that demonstrated a clear reduction in the incidence of PPCs. Furthermore, the use of PLV with low tidal volume and PEEP and intraoperative mechanical ventilation with a vital capacity maneuver followed by 10 cm H2O of PEEP were found to decrease the requirement for postoperative noninvasive ventilation. CPAP with standard oxygen therapy was the only intervention that reduced the need for reintubation. Various ventilation strategies are available for both intraoperative and postoperative periods with the goal of decreasing the need for postoperative noninvasive ventilation (PNIV) or re-intubation with postoperative mechanical ventilation (POMV).

Predictive Accuracy of the ROX Index for Re-Intubation in Mechanically Ventilated Patients With COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have suggested that high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is useful for respiratory support after extubation in subjects with COVID-19 pneumonia, whereas 18% subsequently needed to undergo re-intubation. This study aimed to evaluate whether the breathing frequency (f)-ratio of oxygen saturation (ROX) index, which has been shown to be useful for predicting future intubation, is also useful for re-intubation in subjects with COVID-19. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed mechanically ventilated subjects with COVID-19 who underwent HFNC therapy after extubation at 4 participating hospitals between January 2020-May 2022. We evaluated the predictive accuracy of ROX at 0, 1, and 2 h for re-intubation until ICU discharge and compared the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the ROX index with those of f and SpO2 /FIO2 . RESULTS: Among the 248 subjects with COVID-19 pneumonia, 44 who underwent HFNC therapy after extubation were included. A total of 32 subjects without re-intubation were classified into the HFNC success group, and 12 with re-intubation were classified into the failure group. The overall trend that the area under the ROC curve of the ROX index was greater than that of the f and SaO2 /FIO2 was observed, although there was no statistical significance at any time point. The ROX index at 0 h, at the cutoff point of < 7.44, showed a sensitivity and specificity of 0.42 and 0.97, respectively. A trend of positive correlation between the time until re-intubation and ROX index at each time point was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The ROX index in the early phase of HFNC therapy after extubation was useful for predicting re-intubation with high accuracy in mechanically ventilated subjects with COVID-19. Close observation for patients with < 7.44 ROX index just after extubation may be warranted because of their high risk for re-intubation.

High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy for respiratory management after postoperative re-intubation/re-extubation in patients with trisomy 18 and trisomy 13: Two case reports.

We present two cases of general anesthesia in children with 18, 13 trisomy. One patient had difficulty with intubation and had to be reintubated postoperatively, another developed postoperative acute respiratory distress syndrome. The use of postoperative high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy to avoid reintubation is considered a feasible strategy.

Incidence and Risk Factors Associated with Respiratory Compromise in Planned PICU Admissions Following Tonsillectomy.

OBJECTIVES: Review the incidence and factors associated with respiratory compromise requiring intensive care unit level interventions in children with planned admission to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) following tonsillectomy or adenotonsillectomy (T/AT). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Review of all patients with PICU admissions following T/AT from 2015 to 2020 at a tertiary care pediatric hospital. Patient demographics, underlying comorbidities, operative data, and respiratory complications during PICU admission were extracted. RESULTS: Seven hundred and seventy-two patients were admitted to the PICU following T/AT, age 6.1 ± 4.6 years. All children were diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea or sleep-disordered breathing (mean pre-operative apnea-hypopnea index 29 ± 26.5 and O2 nadir 77.1% ± 11.1). Neuromuscular disease, enteral feed dependence, and obesity were common findings (N = 240 (31%), N = 106 (14%), and N = 209 (27%) respectively). Overall, 29 patients (3.7%) developed respiratory compromise requiring PICU-level support, defined as new-onset continuous or bilevel positive airway pressure support (n = 25) or reintubation (n = 9). Three patients were diagnosed with pulmonary edema. Multivariable regression analysis demonstrated pre-operative oxygen nadir and enteral feed dependence were associated with respiratory compromise (OR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.94-0.99, P = .04; OR = 6.3, 95% CI 2.36-52.6, P = .001 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our study found respiratory compromise in 3.7% of patients with planned PICU admissions following T/AT. Oxygen nadir and enteral feeds were associated with higher respiratory compromise rates. Attention should be given to these factors in planning for post-operative disposition.

Comparison of SpO 2/FiO 2 and ROX index for predicting failure of high-flow nasal cannula therapy in children with acute respiratory failure after congenital heart surgery / 中国小儿急救医学

Objective:To compare the predictive ability of SpO 2/FiO 2(S/F) and ROX index on the failure of high-flow nasal cannula(HFNC)therapy in children with acute respiratory failure after congenital heart disease surgery, and to identify the best cut-off point. Methods:Through a case-control study, the clinical data of 371 children with acute respiratory failure after congenital heart surgery treated with HFNC admitted to Guangzhou Women and Children′s Medical Center from January 2018 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed.The primary outcome was the need for re-intubation within 48 h after extubation of invasive ventilation.The ability of S/F and ROX index to predict HFNC failure was compared, and the optimal cut-off point was determined based on the area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic curve.Results:A total of 371 children were included, of whom 27 (7.3%) eventually required mechanical ventilation within 48 h. The S/F prediction accuracy was highest after 6 h of HFNC treatment(AUC=0.712, 95% CI 0.599-0.825, P=0.001), and the best cut-off point for S/F was 178 mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)(sensitivity 74.9%, specificity 69.6%). Whereas the prediction accuracy of the ROX index was highest after 12 hours of HFNC treatment, the AUC was 0.737(95% CI 0.623-0.851, P=0.002), and the best cut-off point of the ROX index was 5.865(sensitivity 72.4% specificity 66.7%). The difference in AUC between S/F after 6 h of HFNC treatment and ROX after 12 h was not statistically significant ( P=0.444), with higher sensitivity and specificity, and earlier prediction time(6 hours) in the former. Conclusion:Children with acute respiratory failure after congenital heart surgery have a strong predictive ability of S/F after 6 h of HFNC treatment, and the risk of HFNC treatment failure is higher in children with S/F <178 mmHg.

Demographic and Clinical Variables Associated With 30-day Re-Intubation Following Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.

BACKGROUND: A retrospective study was performed to evaluate factors associated with 30-d re-intubation following surgical aortic valve repair. We hypothesized a significant increase in the odds of re-intubation among patients with preoperative comorbidities. METHODS: The American College of Surgery National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2007 to 2016 was used to evaluate demographic and clinical factors associated with 30-d re-intubation following surgical aortic valve repair. Multivariable logistic regression was used to report factors associated with 30-d re-intubation while controlling for various patient characteristics. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 5,766 adult subjects who underwent surgical aortic valve repair, of whom 258 (4.47%) were re-intubated within 30 d of surgery. The mean ± SD age was 69 ± 12.98 y, and 3,668 (63.6%) were male. The prevalence of diabetes mellitus, shortness of breath, poor functional status, COPD, congestive heart failure, hypertension, and bleeding disorder was higher among subjects who were re-intubated compared to those who were not (P < .05). Age, severe COPD, congestive heart failure, and bleeding disorder were associated with this outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Age, COPD, congestive heart failure, and bleeding disorder were associated with 30-d re-intubation in this surgical cohort. If surgical aortic valve repair is deemed non-emergent, patients should be optimized preoperatively and receive careful postoperative planning to reduce the risk of postoperative complications.

A comparison of postoperative respiratory complications associated with the use of desflurane and sevoflurane: a single-centre cohort study.

Sevoflurane and desflurane are the most commonly used volatile anaesthetics for maintenance of anaesthesia. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the relationship between choice of volatile anaesthetic and early postoperative respiratory complications, and to address a critical knowledge gap in safety outcomes between these two commonly used agents. We performed a retrospective analysis of adult (non-cardiac surgery) patients who received sevoflurane or desflurane for the maintenance of general anaesthesia at our institution between 2005 and 2018. We evaluated the association between desflurane exposure (when compared with sevoflurane) and the primary outcome of postoperative respiratory complications, defined by early post-extubation desaturation (Sp O2  < 90%) or re-intubation within 7 days postoperatively. Multivariable regression analyses were performed and adjusted for confounding factors, including patient, anaesthetic and surgical factors. Propensity matched, interaction and sub-group analyses were performed to assess outcomes in high-risk groups: morbidly obese (BMI > 35 kg.m-2 ); elderly (age > 65 years); and high risk of respiratory complications as well as the primary outcome at 24 h. Desflurane was used for 23,830 patients and sevoflurane for 84,608 patients. Patients exposed to desflurane did not demonstrate a reduced risk of postoperative respiratory complications when compared with sevoflurane (adjusted odds ratio 0.99, 95%CI 0.94-1.04, p = 0.598). These findings were consistent across all sub-groups of high-risk patients and in the propensity score matched cohort. In summary, desflurane use was not associated with reduced postoperative respiratory complications when compared with sevoflurane. In the context of environmental and cost concerns with volatile anaesthetic agents, our study provides important data to support organisational decisions regarding the use of desflurane.

Preventive use of respiratory support after scheduled extubation in critically ill medical patients-a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory support has been increasingly used after extubation for the prevention of re-intubation and improvement of prognosis in critically ill medical patients. However, the optimal respiratory support method is still under debate. This network meta-analysis (NMA) aims to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of various respiratory support methods used for preventive purposes after scheduled extubation in critically ill medical patients. METHODS: A systematic database search was performed from inception to December 19, 2019, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared a preventive use of different respiratory support methods, including conventional oxygen therapy (COT), noninvasive ventilation (NIV), high-flow oxygen therapy (HFOT), and combinational use of HFOT and NIV (HFOT+NIV), after planned extubation in adult critically ill medical patients. Study selection, data extraction, and quality assessments were performed in duplicate. The primary outcomes included re-intubation rate and short-term mortality. RESULTS: Seventeen RCTs comprising 3341 participants with 4 comparisons were included. Compared with COT, NIV significantly reduced the re-intubation rate [risk ratio (RR) 0.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.39 to 0.77; moderate quality of evidence] and short-term mortality (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.91; moderate quality of evidence). Compared to COT, HFOT had a beneficial effect on the re-intubation rate (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.86; moderate quality of evidence) but no effect on short-term mortality (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.12; low quality of evidence). No significant difference in the re-intubation rate or short-term mortality was found among NIV, HFOT, and HFOT+NIV. The treatment rankings based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) from best to worst for re-intubation rate were HFOT+NIV (95.1%), NIV (53.4%), HFOT (51.2%), and COT (0.3%), and the rankings for short-term mortality were NIV (91.0%), HFOT (54.3%), HFOT+NIV (43.7%), and COT (11.1%). Sensitivity analyses of trials with a high risk of extubation failure for the primary outcomes indicated that the SUCRA rankings were comparable to those of the primary analysis. CONCLUSIONS: After scheduled extubation, the preventive use of NIV is probably the most effective respiratory support method for comprehensively preventing re-intubation and short-term death in critically ill medical patients, especially those with a high risk of extubation failure.

High-Flow Nasal Cannula May Not Reduce the Re-Intubation Rate Compared With a Large-Volume Nebulization-Based Humidifier.

BACKGROUND: High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy may reduce the re-intubation rate compared with conventional oxygen therapy. However, HFNC has not been sufficiently compared with conventional oxygen therapy with a heated humidifier, even though heated humidification is beneficial for facilitating airway clearance. METHODS: This study was a single-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial. We randomized subjects with respiratory failure after extubation to either HFNC group or to a large-volume humidified nebulization-based nebulizer. The primary end point was the re-intubation rate within 7 d after extubation. RESULTS: We could not recruit enough subjects for the sample size we designed, therefore, we analyzed 69 subjects (HFNC group, 30 subjects; nebulizer group, 39 subjects). The re-intubation rate within 7 d was not significantly different between the HFNC and nebulizer groups (5/30 subjects [17%] and 6/39 subjects [15%], respectively; P > .99). [Formula: see text]/set [Formula: see text] at 24 h after extubation was also not significantly different between the respective groups (264 ± 105 mm Hg in the HFNC group vs 224 ± 53 mm Hg in the nebulizer group; P = .07). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with a large-volume nebulization-based humidifier, HFNC may not reduce the re-intubation rate within 7 d. However, because of insufficient statistical power, further studies are needed to reach a conclusion.

Not All COPD Patients Benefit from Prophylactic Noninvasive Ventilation After Scheduled Extubation: An Exploratory Study.

Background: Prophylactic noninvasive ventilation (NIV) after scheduled extubation can benefit patients with chronic respiratory disorders, among which chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a significant example. However, it is not known whether all COPD patients benefit from prophylactic NIV. Methods: We performed a post hoc analysis of prospectively collected data. COPD patients who successfully completed a spontaneous breathing trial were enrolled. In the prophylactic NIV group, NIV was applied immediately after extubation. In the usual care group, conventional oxygen therapy was used. Patients were followed up to 90 days post-extubation. Results: Among patients with PaCO2 > 45 mmHg, 128 and 40 received prophylactic NIV and usual care, respectively. Prophylactic NIV led to lower rates of re-intubation (4% vs 30% at 72 h and 11% vs 35% at 7 days, both p < 0.01) and hospital mortality (18% vs 40%, p < 0.01) than usual care. The proportion of 90-day mortality was also lower in the prophylactic NIV group (log rank test, p = 0.04). Among patients with PaCO2 ≤ 45 mmHg, 32 and 21 received prophylactic NIV and usual care, respectively. In this cohort however, prophylactic NIV neither reduced re-intubation (6% vs 5% at 72 h, p > 0.99, and 9% vs 14% at 7 days, p = 0.67) nor hospital mortality (19% vs 24%, p = 0.74). The proportion of 90-day mortality did not differ between the two groups (log rank test, p = 0.79). Conclusion: This exploratory study shows that prophylactic NIV benefits COPD patients with PaCO2 > 45 mmHg, but it may not benefit those with PaCO2 ≤ 45 mmHg. Further study with a larger sample size is required to confirm this.

Effect of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy compared with conventional oxygen therapy in postoperative patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNC) versus conventional oxygen therapy (COT) on the reintubation rate, rate of escalation of respiratory support and clinical outcomes in postextubation adult surgical patients. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of published literature. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Index and Wan fang databases were searched up to August 2018. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies in postoperative adult surgical patients (≥18 years), receiving HFNC or COT applied immediately after extubation that reported reintubation, escalation of respiratory support, postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) and mortality were eligible for inclusion. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: The following data were extracted from the included studies: first author's name, year of publication, study population, country of origin, study design, number of patients, patients' baseline characteristics and outcomes. Associations were evaluated using risk ratio (RR) and 95% CIs. RESULTS: This meta-analysis included 10 studies (1327 patients). HFNC significantly reduced the reintubation rate (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.61, p<0.0001) and rate of escalation of respiratory support (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.73, p=0.002) in postextubation surgical patients compared with COT. There were no differences in the incidence of PPCs (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.08, p=0.21) or mortality (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.16 to 1.29, p=0.14). CONCLUSION: HFNC is associated with a significantly lower reintubation rate and rate of escalation of respiratory support compared with COT in postextubation adult surgical patients, but there is no difference in the incidence of PPCs or mortality. More well-designed, large randomised controlled trials are needed to determine the subpopulation of patients who are most likely to benefit from HFNC therapy.

Noninvasive Respiratory Support for Postextubation Respiratory Failure.

The rate of re-intubation after endotracheal extubation for all indications is estimated at ∼20%. This high rate is related, in part, to the development of postoperative complications that leads to acute respiratory failure that requires re-intubation. In general, 5-10% of all surgical patients develop postoperative respiratory failure, and, in patients who require abdominal surgery, up to 40% develop respiratory failure. The forms of respiratory support that have been shown to be most effective in managing postextubation respiratory failure and preventing re-intubation are noninvasive ventilation, CPAP, and high-flow nasal cannula. From an analysis of the data, it is clear that patients at high risk of re-intubation require CPAP, noninvasive ventilation, or high-flow nasal cannula after extubation to allow for a smooth transition to spontaneous breathing and to minimize the need for re-intubation. CPAP is most indicated in patients with atelectasis in which high levels of PEEP are needed, noninvasive ventilation is indicated in the patient unable to maintain an adequate minute ventilation without excessive work of breathing, and high-flow nasal cannula is indicated in the patient with severe hypoxemia that was not a result of marked atelectasis or severe ARDS. It is also clear that there are insufficient data to support the use of any of these therapies in patients at low risk for re-intubation or the development of postoperative pulmonary complications.

Different Solutions for Damaged Nasotracheal Tube during Maxillofacial Surgery: A Case Series.

Difficult airway management and intraoperative tube damage are important problems during maxillofacial surgery. Damage occurs frequently during the surgery, and the anesthesiologist must be ready to find a quick and safe solution. Replacing the damaged endotracheal tube involves additional difficulties, and various factors must be evaluated. We present two cases of nasotracheal tube (NTT) damage suffered during maxillofacial surgery. The different intraoperative conditions led us to decide for the replacement of NTT in one case and for conservative action in the other. The purpose of this article is to highlight the difficulties that the anesthesiologist may have in deciding quickly what is the best approach in case the endotracheal tube is damaged during maxillofacial surgery and possibly try to provide a rapid and safe solution for the situation.

Effect of cough assist on the effect of sputum excretion in patients with cough and weakness after extubation / 中国实用护理杂志

Objective@#To investigate the effect of cough assist on sputum excretion and the outcome of withdrawal of mechanical ventilation after mechanically ventilated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with cough weakness.@*Methods@#From January 2017 to December 2018, 74 patients with cough and weakness COPD after extubation of mechanical ventilation in the Department of Respiratory Critical Care Medicine of Hunan Provincial People's Hospital were divided into control group(n=37) and observation group (n=37) according to the random number table method. The patients in the control group were treated routinely after weaning and extubation, and the observation group was treated with cough assist after withdrawal of mechanical ventilation and extubation on the basis of the control group. The differences in drainage effect, blood gas index, reintubation rate and early prognosis index between the two groups were compared.@*Results@#After the intervention treatment, the first active sputum excretion and the total sputum volume on the first day were (5.6±3.4) ml and (33.1±5.2) ml in the observationgroup, and (4.2 ±2.0) ml and (29.1±7.4) ml in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (t=-2.10, 2.875, P<0.05). The number of significant cases of respiratory sound improvement in the observation group and the control group was 21 and 14 cases, respectively, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (Z=-1.974, P < 0.05). The oxygen partial pressure (PaO2) and oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2) carbon dioxide partial pressure (PaCO2) values of the observation group were (80.0±8.4), (345.9±19.2), (46.7±6.6)mmHg, and (74.8±9.1), (310.7±21.9), (50.9±7.1)mmHg in the control group. The difference was statistically significant (t=-2.504,-2.710, 2.579, all P<0.05). The reintubation rate, noninvasive ventilation time, and hospitalization days after the initial extubation in the observation group were as follows: 5.6%(2/36), (64.1±18.9)h, (6.0±1.7)d, and 22.2%(8/36), (76.7±15.3)h, (7.2±2.8)d in the control group. The difference was statistically significant (χ2=4.181, t=2.528, 2.438, all P<0.05). The non-invasive ventilation rate within 72h in the observation group and the control group were 63.9% (23/36) and 75.0% (27/36), the difference was not statistically significant (χ2=0.222, P>0.05).@*Conclusions@#The application of cough assist in RICU patients with cough weakness after extubation by mechanical ventilation can improve the expectoration efficiency of cough, improve oxygenation, reduce carbon dioxide retention, reduce the rate of re-intubation, shorten the time of noninvasive ventilation and hospitalization after extubation, and improve the curative effect.

Effect of Noninvasive Ventilation After Unplanned Extubation.

BACKGROUND: Our study set out to test the effect of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) performed after unplanned extubation. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data in a university-affiliated mixed ICU of 12 beds during a 5-y period (January 2013 to December 2017). Unplanned extubation was defined as the occurrence of an unplanned removal of the endotracheal tube, whether deliberate or accidental. NIV after an unplanned extubation was not protocolized and was decided by the physician in charge on an individual basis. RESULTS: A total of 121 subjects (median [25th-75th percentile] age, 62.1 [43.3-73.6] y; median [25th-75th percentile] Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, 45 [36-54]) experienced 131 unplanned extubation episodes. Re-intubation was deemed necessary in 35 subjects (28.9%). NIV was used in 24 subjects (19.8%) (prophylactic NIV, n = 10; rescue NIV, n = 14). The re-intubation rates were 25.8%, 10%, and 64.3% in the no NIV, prophylactic, and rescue NIV subgroups, respectively. The median (25th-75th percentile) time to re-intubation was longer for subjects on NIV (9.1 [3.5-49.2] vs 0.46 [0.25-1] h, P = .001). The median (25th-75th percentile) ICU length of stay and duration of mechanical ventilation were longer in the subjects who underwent NIV (14.5 [7-24.5] vs 6 [3-14] d, respectively, P = .004; and 9 [3-22] vs 3 [1-7.3] d, respectively, P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: NIV after unplanned extubation had uncertain efficacy, especially when provided as rescue management of postextubation respiratory failure.