Transrectal contrast-enhanced ultrasound-guided transperineal core-needle biopsy versus endoscopic forceps biopsy in the diagnosis of complex rectal lesions.

Background: The preoperative pathological diagnosis of rectal lesions is crucial for formulating treatment plans. For subepithelial lesions (SELs) and larger lesions with necrosis of the rectum, endoscopic forceps biopsy (EFB) cannot provide an accurate pathological diagnosis in most cases. By comparing the efficacy and safety of transrectal contrast-enhanced ultrasound-guided transperineal core-needle biopsy (TRCEUS-TP-CNB) and EFB, this study explored the value of TRCEUS-TP-CNB in the diagnosis of complex rectal lesions, such as SELs. Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional study was conducted with 32 consecutive patients with complex rectal lesions admitted to our hospital from May 2016 to June 2022. Clinical, ultrasound, and pathological data were collected from these patients who underwent EFB followed by TRCEUS-TP-CNB. Results: The success rate of EFB was 21.88% (7/32) and that of TRCEUS-TP-CNB was 93.75% (30/32). No significant complications were observed for either biopsy method. Factors affecting the success rate of EFB included the lesion width (cm) (1.90±0.62 vs. 4.26±2.40, P<0.001) and lesion thickness (cm) (1.29±0.51 vs. 2.96±1.75, P<0.001). The success rate of TRCEUS-TP-CNB was not affected by these factors. In the paired study of TRCEUS-TP-CNB and EFB, the times of samples per person (1 vs. 2.14±0.90, P=0.015), number of specimens per sample (8.27±1.93 vs. 3.31±1.67, P<0.001), lesion width (cm) (3.79±2.42 vs. 1.90±0.62, P=0.001), and lesion thickness (cm) (2.64±1.75 vs. 1.29±0.51, P=0.001) were the factors affecting the difference of the sampling success rate. In the SELs, the success rate of EFB was 10% (1/10) and that of TRCEUS-TP-CNB was 100% (10/10), and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P=0.004). Conclusions: TRCEUS-TP-CNB is an effective biopsy method for complex rectal lesions. The success rate of EFB is lower in the larger lesions. Compared with EFB, TRCEUS-TP-CNB required fewer times of samples be taken and obtained more specimens. For larger lesions and SELs of the rectum, TRCEUS-TP-CNB is expected to become one of the preferred biopsy methods.

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Is Safe and Effective for Lesions Located at the Anorectal Junction: Analysis from Two Referral European Centers.

Introduction: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a well-established resection technique for colorectal superficial tumors, but its role in the treatment of anorectal junction (ARJ) lesions still remains to be determined. With this study, we aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of ESD for the resection of ARJ lesions, in comparison to more proximal rectal lesions. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data concerning all consecutive rectal ESD procedures performed in two European centers, from 2015 to 2021. Results: A total of two hundred and fifty-two rectal lesions were included. Sixty (24%) were ARJ lesions, and the remaining 192 (76%) were located proximally. Technical success was achieved in 248 procedures (98%), and its rate was similar in both locations (p = 0.246). Most of the lesions presented high-grade dysplasia/Tis adenocarcinoma (54%); 36 (15%) had submucosal adenocarcinoma, including 20 superficial (sm1) and 16 deeply invasive (>SM1) T1 cancers. We found no differences between ARJ and rectal lesions in regard to en bloc resection rate (100% vs. 96%, p = 0.204), R0 resection rate (76% vs. 75%, p = 0.531), curative resection rate (70% vs. 70%, p = 0.920), procedures' median duration (120 min vs. 90 min, p = 0.072), ESD velocity (14 vs. 12 mm2/min, p = 0.415), histopathology result (p = 0.053), and the need for surgery due to a non-curative ESD (5% vs. 3%, p = 0.739). Also, there was no statistically significant difference that concerns delayed bleeding (7% vs. 8%, p = 0.709), perforation (0% vs. 5%, p = 0.075), or the need for readmission (2% vs. 2%, p = 0.939). Nevertheless, anorectal stenosis (5% vs. 0%, p = 0.003) and anorectal pain (9% vs. 1%, p = 0.002) were significantly more frequent in ARJ lesions. Conclusion: ESD is a safe and efficient resection technique for the treatment of rectal lesions located in the ARJ.

Introdução: A dissecção endoscópica da submucosa (ESD) é uma técnica endoscópica com demonstrada eficácia nas lesões neoplásicas superficiais colorectais. No entanto, a evidência da sua eficácia nas lesões localizadas na junção ano-rectal é escassa. O nosso objectivo foi avaliar a segurança e eficácia da ESD nas lesões da junção anorectal (menos de 2 cm da linha pectínea), em comparação com as lesões mais proximais do recto. Métodos: Análise retrospectiva de registos colhidos prospectivamente de dois centros europeus de referência, entre 2015 e 2021. Resultados: Foram incluídas 252 lesões. Sessenta (24%) localizavam-se na junção ano-rectal, e as restantes 192 noutro local do recto. O sucesso técnico foi de 98% (n = 248) e foi semelhante nas 2 localizações (p = 0.246). A maioria das lesões eram displasias de alto grau/Tis (54%); 36 (15%) tinham adenocarcinoma submucoso, tendo 20 invasão submucosa superficial (sm1) e 16 invasão profunda (>SM1). Não foram encontradas diferenças entre as duas localizações relativamente às taxas de ressecção em bloco (100% vs. 96%, p = 0.204), R0 (76% vs. 75%, p = 0.531), ou curativa (70% vs. 70%, p = 0.920), duração da ESD (mediana 120 min vs. 90 min, p = 0.072), velocidade da ESD (14 vs. 12 mm2/min, p = 0.415) ou resultado histológico (p = 0.053), assim como na necessidade de cirurgia por ESD não curativa (5% vs. 3%, p = 0.739). Além disso, as taxas de hemorragia tardia (7% vs. 8%, p = 0.709), perfuração (0% vs. 5%, p = 0.075) e necessidade de internamento por complicações (2% vs. 2%, p = 0.939) não revelaram diferenças estatisticamente significativas. A estenose ano-rectal (5% vs. 0%, p = 0.003) e a dor ano-rectal (9% vs. 1%, p = 0.002) foram mais frequentes nas lesões da junção ano-rectal. Conclusão: A ESD é uma técnica segura e eficaz no tratamento das lesões do recto localizadas na junção ano-rectal.

Trans-anal endoscopic microsurgery for non- adenomatous rectal lesions.

BACKGROUND: Trans-anal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) enables a good visualization of the surgical field and is considered the method of choice for excision of adenomas and early T1 rectal cancer. The rectum and retro-rectal space might be the origin of uncommon neoplasms, benign and aggressive, certain require radical trans-abdominal surgery, while others can be treated by a less aggressive approach. In this study we report outcomes in patients undergoing TEM for rare and non-adenomatous rectal and retro-rectal lesions over a period of 11 years. AIM: To report outcomes in patients undergoing TEM for rare and non-adenomatous rectal and retro-rectal lesions over a period of 11 years. METHODS: Between January 2008 to December 2019 a retrospective analysis was completed for all patients who underwent TEM for non-adenomatous rectal lesion or retro-rectal mass in our institution. Patients were discharged once diet was well tolerated and no complications were identified. They were evaluated at 3 wk post operatively, then at 3-mo intervals for the first 2 years and every 6 mo depending on the nature of the final pathology. Clinical examination and rectoscopy were performed during each of the follow-up visits. RESULTS: Out of 198 patients who underwent TEM during the study period, 18 had non-adenomatous rectal or retro-rectal lesions. Mean age was 47 years. The mean size of the lesions was 2.9 mm, with a mean distance from the anal margin of 7.9 cm. Mean surgical time was 97.8 min. There were no intra-operative neither late post-operative complications. Mean length of stay was 2.5 d. Mean patient follow-up duration was 42 mo. CONCLUSION: TEM allows for reduced morbidity given its minimally invasive nature. Surgeons should be familiar with the technique but careful patient selection should be considered. It can be used safely for uncommon rectal and selected retro-rectal lesions without compromising outcomes. We believe that it should be reasonably considered as one of the surgical methods when treating rare lesions.

Excision of malignant and pre-malignant rectal lesions by transanal endoscopic microsurgery in patients under 50 years of age.

BACKGROUND: The most common technique for treating benign and early malignant rectal lesions is transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). Local excision is an acceptable technique for high-risk and elderly patients, but there are hardly any data regarding young patients. AIM: To describe TEM outcomes in patients under 50 years of age. METHODS: We collected demographic, clinical, and pathological data from all patients under the age of 50 years who underwent the TEM procedure at Hasharon Rabin Medical Center from January 2005 to December 2018. RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 26 patients under the age of 50 years underwent TEM procedures. Their mean age was 43.3 years. Eleven (42.0%) were male. The mean operative time was 67 min, and the mean tumor size was 2.39 cm, with a mean anal verge distance of 8.50 cm. No major intraoperative or postoperative complications were recorded. The median length of stay was 2 d. Seven (26.9%) lesions were adenomas with low-grade dysplasia, four (15.4%) were high-grade dysplasia adenomas, two were T1 carcinomas (7.8%), and three were T2 carcinomas (11.5%). No residual disease was found following endoscopic polypectomy in two patients (7.8%), but four (15.4%) had other pathologies. Surgical margins were negative in all cases. Local recurrence was detected in one patient 33 mo following surgery. CONCLUSION: Among young adult patients, TEM for benign rectal lesions has excellent outcomes. It may also offer a balance between the efficacy of complete oncologic resection and postoperative quality of life in the treatment of rectal cancer. In some cases, it may be considered an alternative to radical surgery.

Transanal Local Excision or Endoscopic Dissection for Benign and Large Lesions of the Rectum.

Since the introduction of transanal endoscopic microsurgery, local excision of "early" rectal lesions has offered the possibility to reduce the invasiveness of treatment for the limited disease. Flexible endoscopy techniques allow today different alternatives consisting of endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection. The first is a straightforward and relatively easy technique, but it prevents a correct pathological staging of the lesion due to fragmentation and the verification of disease-free margins. The second relies on operators' audacity depending on their increasing experience due to the limited progress in technology. What is the preferable technique today is questionable. All the methods have pros and cons. The future certainly will see the use of ideal systems, allowing the possibility of precision surgery for partial- or full-thickness excision, depending on intraoperative findings, and the extension above the rectosigmoid junction. Miniaturized flexible robotic devices may represent the solution for both issues.

Systematic review of functional outcomes and quality of life after transanal endoscopic microsurgery and transanal minimally invasive surgery: a word of caution.

PURPOSE: The introduction of transanal endoscopic or minimally invasive surgery has allowed organ preservation for rectal tumors with good oncological results. Data on functional and quality-of-life (QoL) outcomes are scarce and controversial. This systematic review sought to synthesize fecal continence, QoL, and manometric outcomes after transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) or transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS). METHODS: A systematic review of the literature including Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases was conducted searching for articles reporting on functional outcomes after TEM or TAMIS between January 1995 and June 2018. The evaluated outcome parameters were pre- and postoperative fecal continence (primary endpoint), QoL, and manometric results. Data were extracted using the same scales and measurement units as from the original study. RESULTS: A total of 29 studies comprising 1297 patients were included. Fecal continence outcomes were evaluated in 23 (79%) studies with a wide variety of assessment tools and divergent results. Ten studies (34%) analyzed QoL changes, and manometric variables were assessed in 15 studies (51%). Most studies reported some deterioration in manometric scores without major QoL impairment. Due to the heterogeneity of the data, it was not possible to perform any pooled analysis or meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS: These techniques do not seem to affect continence by themselves except in minor cases. The possibility of worsened function after TEM and TAMIS should not be underestimated. There is a need to homogenize or standardize functional and manometric outcomes assessment after TEM or TAMIS.

Quantitative Elastography of Rectal Lesions: The Value ofShear Wave Elastography in Identifying Benign and Malignant Rectal Lesions.

We evaluate the value of shear wave elastography (SWE) in diagnosing benign and malignant rectal lesions. A total of 96 lesions were reviewed in this study; endorectal ultrasound (ERUS) and SWE examinations were performed before surgery in all cases. Elasticity parameters including mean elastographic index (Emean), maximum elastographic index (Emax) and minimum elastographic index (Emin) were analyzed. Correlations between elastographic parameters and histopathological results were studied. Inter-observer and intra-observer agreement was analyzed. Of the 96 rectal lesions, 72 were malignant and 24 were benign. Compared with ERUS, ERUS + SWE had higher sensitivity (93.0% vs. 88.9%), specificity (83.3% vs. 79.2%), positive predictive value (94.4% vs. 92.7%), negative predictive value (80.0% vs. 70.4%) and overall accuracy (90.6% vs. 86.4%). In receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, Emean and Emax had larger areas under the curve: 0.92 and 0.91, respectively. The optimal cutoff value was 61.3 kPa for Emean (sensitivity = 88.9%, specificity = 87.5%) and 63.4 kPa for Emax (sensitivity = 94.4%, specificity = 83.3%). We obtained κ values of 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72-0.95) for ERUS and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.81-0.99) for ERUS + SWE of differential diagnosis in two observers. The intra-class correlation coefficients for intra-observer variability of stiffness (Emean) in malignant lesions, benign lesions, surrounding normal rectal wall in malignant lesions and surrounding normal rectal wall in benign lesions were 0.91 (95% CI: 0.86-0.94), 0.94 (95% CI: 0.88-0.97), 0.92 (95% CI: 0.88-0.95) and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.77-0.95), respectively. SWE is a promising tool that yields valuable quantitative data additional to that provided by ERUS examination in rectal lesions. The cutoff value 61.3 kPa for Emean may serve as a complementary tool in diagnosis of rectal lesions.

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for the treatment of uncommon rectal lesions. / Microcirugía endoscópica transanal en el tratamiento de lesiones rectales atípicas.

INTRODUCTION: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) was developed as a less aggressive alternative treatment for rectal lesions (mainly adenomas and adenocarcinomas). However, its use for other rectal lesions has become more frequent, trying to reduce the morbidity associated with more invasive techniques. The aim of this study is to describe our experience in the use of TEM in other rectal lesions. METHODS: Retrospective and descriptive study including patients operated with TEM (from June 2008 to December 2016) for the treatment of rectal lesions different from adenomas or adenocarcinomas. RESULTS: Among the 138 patients treated by TEM in our department, 10 patients were operated on for rectal lesions other than adenomas or adenocarcinomas. Rectal lesions were 3neuroendocrine tumours, a neuroendocrine tumour metastasis, a rectal stenosis, a cloacogenic polyp, an endometrioma, a retrorrectal tumour, a presacral abscess and a lesion in the rectovaginal septum. Mean operative time was 72min and postoperative stay was 4.2 days. Only one patient needed a reoperation, due to rectal bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: TEM could be a useful tool for the treatment of rectal lesions different from adenomas or adenocarcinomas, potentially decreasing the morbidity associated with more aggressive surgical techniques.

Cirugía transanal por puerto único para la resección local de lesiones de recto / Single port transanal excision for local treatment of rectal lesions

Background: Since 2009, transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) is increasingly used as an alternative to local excision and transanal microscopic excision (TEM) for rectal lesions located in the mid and superior third. The clinical benefits of the technique are being evaluated. Aim: To establish the feasibility, quality of excision and short term results of single port transanal excision for rectal lesions. Patients and Methods: Analysis of a prospective series of patients subjected to single port transanal excision. Patients had benign or malignant lesions located in the mid or superior third of the rectum. Those with a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma were excluded. Results: The transanal resection using the SILS Port® was completed in 11 patients aged 21 to 86 years (eight women). The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification of patients was two and their body mass index was 24 +/- 3.1 kg/m². The lesion distance from the anal margin ranged from 5 to 10 cm. The surgical time was 47 min and hospital stay was 2.8 days. One patient was converted to conventional transanal surgery and two patients had self-limited episode of hematochezia. Conclusions: TAMIS is a feasible technique and with promising results in selected patients.

Introducción: Desde el año 2009, la cirugía transanal mínimamente invasiva (TAMIS) ha sido utilizada de forma creciente como una alternativa a la excisión local y la resección transanal microscópica (TEM) de lesiones de tercio medio y superior del recto. A pesar de su aceptación, los beneficios clínicos han sido parcialmente validados y se encuentran en etapa de evaluación. Objetivos: Establecer la factibilidad, calidad de resección y resultados a corto plazo del uso del sistema de puerto único en la resección transanal en lesiones de recto. Pacientes y Métodos: Análisis retrospectivo de una serie prospectiva y consecutiva de pacientes sometidos a resección transanal utilizando un dispositivo de puerto único. Los pacientes eran portadores de lesiones benignas y/o malignas de recto medio o superior, excluyendo aquellos con diagnóstico de adenocarcinoma. Resultados: Se completó la resección transanal por SILS Port® en 11 pacientes, 8 de ellos de sexo femenino. Edad media fue de 61,6 años (21-86). La clasificación de ASA fue de 2 e IMC de 24 +/- 3,1 kg/m². La distancia de las lesiones desde el margen anal fue de 7,2 cm (5-10). Tiempo quirúrgico fue de 47,2 min. La estadía hospitalaria fue de 2,8 días. Presentamos una conversión a cirugía transanal convencional y dos rectorragias postoperatorias autolimitadas. Conclusiones: TAMIS se ha convertido en una técnica factible y con resultados prometedores en un grupo de pacientes bien seleccionados. De los nuevos horizontes que ha entregado la cirugía de puerto único, nace esta nueva aplicación para el abordaje transanal, representando una nueva frontera en la cirugía rectal.

The Value of Transrectal Echography in the Diagnosis of Peri-rectal Lesions / 中国医师杂志

Objective To assess the value of transrectal echography(TRE) in diagnosing peri-rectal lesions. Methods The echography images of 287 cases of peri-rectal lesions were retrospectively analyzed,and contrasted with the results of postoperative pathologic examination and the final clinical diagnosis. Results 83 cases of peri-rectal recess lesions were found by TRE, and the occurate rate of diagnosis was 91%. 123 cases of peri-rectal viscera lesions were found by TRE, and the accurate rate of diagnosis was 94%. Conclusion TRE plays an role in the diagnosis of peri-rectal recess and viscera lesions, and in the dynamic and real-time detection of the obstructive causes of bladder orifice.