Redundant nerve root syndrome mimicking an intradural spinal cord tumor: A case report.

Background: The redundant nerve root (RNR) syndrome is a pathological condition in which the cauda equina develops into a severely flexed/tortuous spiral mass above a level of severe lumbar stenosis. Case Description: A 70-year-old male presented with bilateral neurogenic claudication attributed to a MRI-documented intradural extramedullary lesion at the L1 level with severe adjacent level/inferior L2/3 stenosis. At surgery, intradural exploration at L1 revealed an edematous cauda equina consistent with the diagnosis of the RNR syndrome. Conclusion: The RNR syndrome should be included among the differential diagnostic considerations when non-enhancing lesions are encountered above levels of marked lumbar stenosis.

Effectiveness of caudal block in patients with spinal stenosis accompanied by redundant nerve root syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: Redundant nerve root syndrome (RNRS) is characterized by tortuous, elongated, and enlarged nerve roots in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. This study was performed to evaluate the effects of caudal block in patients with RNRS and assess factors associated with RNRS. METHODS: Patients with lumbar spinal stenosis who underwent caudal block were retrospectively analyzed. A comparative analysis of pain reduction was conducted between patients with RNRS (Group R) and those without RNRS (Group C). Generalized estimating equation analysis was used to identify factors related to the treatment response. RNRS-associated factors were analyzed using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: In total, 54 patients were enrolled (Group R, n = 22; Group C, n = 32). Group R had older patients than Group C. The caudal block showed less pain reduction in Group R than in Group C, but the difference was not statistically significant. Generalized estimating equation analysis showed that RNRS was the factor significantly associated with the treatment response. The dural sac anteroposterior diameter and left ligamentum flavum thickness were associated with RNRS in the logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Caudal block tended to be less effective in patients with than without RNRS, but the difference was not statistically significant.

Redundant nerve roots indicate higher degree of stenosis in lumbar spine stenotic patients.

OBJECTIVES: Redundant Nerve Root (RNR) is a tortuous and elongated radiological appearance of cauda equina on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis (LSCS) patients. This study evaluated preoperative spinal morphometry associated with the development of RNR. METHODS: The retrospective cohort was conducted at The Aga Khan University Hospital, and included patients undergoing decompressive spinal surgery secondary to degenerative LSCS in 2015. The patients were divided into two groups with respect to the presence of preoperative RNR. Spinal morphometry was defined by several radiological parameters, including areas of dural sac (DSA), spinal canal, spinal foramen, facets, and spinal joints, and bilateral angles based on vertebral anatomy. RESULTS: A total of 55 patients were enrolled with a mean age of 57.1 years, in which 22 (40%) expressed RNR in their MRI. The RNR group had significantly lower mean DSA (59.64 vs 84.01 mm2; p = 0.028), bilateral posterior facet angle (Right: 33.84 vs 46.21, p = 0.004; Left: 36.43 vs 43.80, p = 0.039) and higher bilateral anterior facet angles (Right: 54.85 vs 44.57, p = 0.026; Left: 55.27 vs 46.36, p = 0.050) compared to the non-RNR group. The other bidimensional and angular parameters did not observe any statistical difference between the two groups. CONCLUSION: RNR was associated with a higher degree of stenosis in patients with LSCS. Bilateral anterior and posterior facets angles contribute to its development, indicating particular spinal morphology to be vulnerable to the stenotic disease.

Effectiveness of Epidural Balloon Neuroplasty in Patients With Chronic Spinal Stenosis Accompanied by Redundant Nerve Roots: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic patients with chronic lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) accompanied by redundant nerve roots (RNR) have poor treatment outcomes. Recently, epidural balloon neuroplasty has been shown to be effective in patients with chronic LSS. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of epidural balloon neuroplasty in patients with chronic LSS accompanied by RNR. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A single pain clinic of a tertiary medical center in Seoul, Republic of Korea. METHODS: Patients with chronic LSS were divided into groups with (RNR group) and without RNR (non-RNR group). The generalized estimating equations (GEE) model was used to evaluate the effectiveness of epidural balloon neuroplasty in both groups based on Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) score for pain intensity, Medication Quantification Scale III (MQS III), and proportion of functional improvement at one, 3, and 6 months postprocedure. RESULTS: GEE analyses showed a significant reduction of pain intensity in NRS-11 and functional improvement compared to baseline throughout the 6-month follow-up period in both groups (P < 0.001), without differences between groups. After adjusting for potential confounding variables, the NRS-11 of leg pain one month after the procedure in the RNR group was reduced less than that in the non-RNR group (P = 0.016), although we did not find a significant time and group interaction. After adjustment, less functional improvement was observed 3 months after the procedures in the RNR group than in the non-RNR group (P = 0.001), with a significant interaction between time and group (P = 0.003). The estimated mean MQS III values were unchanged at 6 months regardless of adjustment in both groups. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective design and a lack of information on adjuvant nonpharmacologic therapies. CONCLUSION: Epidural balloon neuroplasty may be an effective option for reducing pain in patients with chronic LSS accompanied by RNR.

Role of redundant nerve roots in clinical manifestations of lumbar spine stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Redundant nerve roots (RNRs) are defined as elongated, thickened, and tortious appearing roots of the cauda equina secondary to lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSCS). The study compared the clinical and radiological features of patients with LSCS with versus without RNR. METHODS: This retrospective study was performed on 55 patients who underwent decompressive surgery for degenerative LSCS. Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence of RNR in their preoperative magnetic resonance imaging, as evaluated by a radiologist blinded to the study design. Medical records were reviewed for basic demographic, clinical MR presentation, and outcomes utilizing Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores. RESULTS: The mean age of enrolled patients was 57.1, with mean follow-up of 4.0 months. RNR was found in 22 (40%) of patients with LSCS. These patients were older than those patients without RNR (62.2 vs. 53.7). Interestingly, there were no statistically significant differences in clinical presentations, duration of symptoms, and outcomes using JOA scores between the two groups. CONCLUSION: RNR is a relatively common radiological finding (i.e., 40%) in patients with LSCS. It is more likely to be observed in older patients. However, no significant differences were noted in clinical presentation and functional outcomes with respect to the presence or absence of RNR.

Quantification of Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis by Quantitative Fat-Suppressed Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Fat-suppressed T1-weighted magnetic resonance images (MRIs) enhanced with gadolinium can evaluate the internal vertebral venous plexus and cauda equina. This study compared such findings with clinical situations and discusses whether these are helpful for symptomatic grading and selection at the surgical level in patients with lumbar central stenosis. A total of 263 patients (337 levels < 75 mm2 of dural cross sectional area (DCSA)) were included. The enhancement patterns of dorsal epidural vein (DVCE), periradicular vein (PVCE) and intraradicular vein (IRCE) were assessed qualitatively. The quantification of IRCE was acquired by the ratio (%) (enhancement parameters: MS/P1, MS/P2, WR/P1, WR/P2) of signal intensities between the cauda equina (MS-IRCE: maximal spot rootlet, WR-IRCE: whole rootlets) and psoas muscle (P1, P2). Receiver-operator characteristic curves were plotted to obtain imaginary cutoff values for the prediction of symptomatic appearance or operation decision. All levels were classified into seven groups on the basis of pain distribution and the presence of IRCE. PVCE was significantly related to high incidences of symptoms, unilaterality and operation. DVCE and IRCE were connected with high incidences of symptoms, bilaterality and operation. IRCE was also related to high visual analogue scale (VAS), small DCSA and high enhancement parameters. The order of the group was concordant with the degree of enhancement parameters (p = 0.000). Cutoff values of enhancement parameters for prediction were as follows: symptoms (147/123/140/121), bilaterality (165/139/157/137) and operation (164/139/159/138). Enhancement patterns and parameters could help in stratification, grading and decision-making at the surgical level.

Redundant Nerve Root in a Patient With Chronic Lumbar Degenerative Canal Stenosis.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this case report is to describe the diagnostic imaging features of redundant nerve roots caused by chronic lumbar degenerative canal stenosis (CLDCS). CLINICAL FEATURES: A 56-year-old male presented with severe low back pain. He experienced pain during minimal active lumbar range of motion. The patient demonstrated weakness of the right iliopsoas and hypoesthesia of the L-2 dermatome. A working diagnosis of CLDCS was established. The patient's worsening severe low back pain warranted magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine, which was performed for further evaluation. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated disk protrusion and canal stenosis with tortuosity of the cauda equina consistent with redundant nerve root appearance. INTERVENTION AND OUTCOME: The patient was treated with chiropractic flexion distraction, which was followed by a course of acupuncture and spinal manipulation. The patient self-discharged following clinical improvement. CONCLUSIONS: This case demonstrated CLDCS with associated redundant nerve roots. Conservative treatment included chiropractic diversified lumbar spinal manipulation, acupuncture, and electrical stimulation. The patient self-discharged following clinical improvement in 3 months.

Clinical significance of postoperative changes in redundant nerve roots after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal canal stenosis.

OBJECTIVE: The postoperative time course of redundant nerve roots (RNRs) in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSCS) is currently unknown. The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between postoperative morphologic changes in detected RNRs and the clinical outcome of patients with LSCS. METHODS: A total of 33 symptomatic patients with LSCS who demonstrated RNRs on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were treated with decompressive laminectomy alone. On the basis of the MRI scans obtained 7 days after surgery, patients were stratified into two groups: group 1 included patients with resolution of RNRs and group 2 included patients with persistent RNRs. Comparative parameters were examined between the two groups of patients. RESULTS: We found that 24 of the 33 patients showed resolution of RNRs and 9 showed persistent RNRs. Although there was no difference in the Japanese Orthopedic Association score between the two groups before treatment, group 1 showed a greater recovery of Japanese Orthopedic Association score 1 month postoperatively. MRI demonstrated that the cross-sectional area of the preoperative dural sac at the stenotic lesion was smaller in group 2 than in group 1; however, there was no difference in cross-sectional area of the postoperative dural sac between the two groups. Within 12 months, there was no evidence of RNRs in six of the nine cases in group 2. CONCLUSION: Although most patients with LSCS show postoperative resolution of RNRs detected on MRI, some show persistent RNRs postoperatively. The functional outcome of these patients remains poor even if sufficient expansion of the dural sac is achieved postoperatively.

A Case of the Redundant Nerve Root Syndrome Mimicking Intradural Spinal Tumor

The redundant nerve root syndrome is not common and demonstrates a large, elongated, and tortuous nerve roots of cauda equina. Usually, the diagnosis of this syndrome is not difficult with the radiological finding and clinical symptom. The authors report a case of the redundant nerve root syndrome mimicking intradural spinal tumor in view of the symptom and radiological findings. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a globular intradural mass just above canal stenosis. Decompressive laminectomy and durotomy improved back pain and radicular pain. From the experience of this case, the relief of nerve root compression is recommended as early as possible in the redundant nerve root syndrome.

Two Cases of Redundant Nerve Root Syndrome of Cauda Equina

Two cases of redundant nerve root syndrome of cauda equina in patient was described. The general clinical features were the intermittent neurologic claudication with improvement at rest, low back pain of long duration and radicular pain in one or both legs, sensory & motor change in one or both legs. Myelography revealed a partial to complete block with characteristic serpentine filling defects above or below the block simulating a vascular malformation. One case was associated with lumbar H.N.P and the other cases were associated with L-H.N.P and pseudospondylolithesis. In addition to, we reviewed the literature of redundant nerve root syndrome of the cauda equina.

Mobile Neurilemmoma of the Cauda Equina: Case Report

The discrepancy between the myelographic and the operative locations of the tumor, which is allowed by a redundant nerve root, is very unusual. Though unusal, this possible motility should be kept in mind during surgery for cauda equina tumors. Authors report a case of a mobile neurilemmoma of the cauda equina which was successfully removed, and discuss the pathogenesis of mobile meurilemmoma.