Evaluation of Injured Structures and Circulation of Fingers From Photos Taken in the Emergency Department After Hand Injury.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of smartphone photographs, taken at the emergency department (ED) and shared with hand surgeons, in identifying critical circulatory issues and neurovascular bundle injury, as well as tendon and bone injuries. METHODS: The photographs of hand injuries of 50 patients who were referred to our ED between January 2020 and January 2022 were used to design a questionnaire. This questionnaire, including closed-ended questions about the injured structures, was shared with a group of hand surgeons via a WhatsApp group in Turkey. The experience levels of the surgeons were categorized as 0-5 years, 5-10 years, and above 10 years. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed by comparing the results with surgery notes as the reference standard. RESULTS: A total of 94 hand surgeons participated in the study. The accuracy of predicting critical circulatory issues in the hand/fingers from the smartphone photographs was 81.9%, with a sensitivity of 48.0% and a specificity of 91.4%. For neurovascular bundle injuries, the accuracy was 63.0%, with a sensitivity of 63.9% and a specificity of 61.5%. The accuracy of predicting tendon injuries was 64.9%, with a sensitivity of 81.1% and a specificity of 42.5%. The accuracy of predicting fracture was 74.7%, with a sensitivity of 70.9% and a specificity of 79.9%. CONCLUSIONS: Identifying critical circulatory issues solely based on the shared photograph is inadequate. Similarly, evaluation based only on the photograph was insufficient for the detection of neurovascular bundle injuries, tendon ruptures, and fractures. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Digital images acquired in an ED setting and subsequent review of these images by hand surgeons may not be an adequately reliable strategy for determining the necessity of patient transfer.

Window of Opportunity: Rate of Referral to Infertility Providers among Reproductive-Age Women with Newly Diagnosed Gynecologic Cancers.

Background/Objective: Fertility preservation is an important part of oncologic care for newly diagnosed gynecologic cancers for reproductive-age women, as many treatment options negatively impact fertility. The goal of this study is to examine factors that influence access to fertility specialists for women with newly diagnosed gynecologic cancer. Methods: This institutional review board approved a retrospective cohort study investigating the impacting factors on the referral rate from gynecologic oncologists (GO) to reproductive endocrinologists and infertility (REI) specialists at a single academic institution between 2010-2022 for patients age 18-41 at diagnosis. Electronic medical records were used to identify demographics and referral patterns. Mixed logistic models were utilized to control cluster effects of the physicians. Results: Of 816 patients reviewed, 410 met the criteria for inclusion. The referral rate for newly diagnosed gynecologic malignancies was 14.6%. Younger patients were more likely to have an REI referral (p < 0.001). The median time from first GO visit to treatment was 18.5 days, and there was no significant difference in those who had REI referrals (p = 0.44). Only 45.6% of patients had fertility desire documented. A total of 42.7% had fertility-sparing treatment offered by a GO. REI referral did not significantly change the time to treatment (p = 0.44). An REI referral was more likely to be placed if that patient had no living children, no past medical history, or if the referring GO was female (OR = 11.46, 6.69, and 3.8, respectively). Conclusions: Fertility preservation counseling is a critical part of comprehensive cancer care; yet, the referral to fertility services remains underutilized in patients with newly diagnosed gynecologic cancer. By demonstrating these biases in REI referral patterns, we can optimize provider education to enhance fertility care coordination.

Acceptance of electronic referrals across the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: results from a national e-health database.

Introduction: An effective referral system is necessary to ensure quality and an optimum continuum of care. In the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, an e-referral system known as the Saudi Medical Appointments and Referrals Centre (SMARC), has been fully functioning since 2019. This study aims to explore the rate of medical e-referral request acceptance in the KSA, and to study the factors associated with acceptance. Methods: This period cross-sectional study utilised secondary collected data from the SMARC e-referral system. The data spans both 2020 and 2021 and covers the entirety of the KSA. Bivariate analyses and binary logistic regression analyses were performed to compute adjusted Odds Ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals. Results: Of the total 632,763 referral requests across the 2 years, 469,073 requests (74.13%) were accepted. Absence of available machinery was a significant predictor for referral acceptance compared to other reasons. Acceptance was highest for children under 14 with 28,956 (75.48%) and 63,979 (75.48%) accepted referrals, respectively. Patients requiring critical care from all age groups also had the highest acceptance including 6,237 referrals for paediatric intensive care unit (83.54%) and 34,126 referrals for intensive care unit (79.65%). All lifesaving referrals, 42,087 referrals, were accepted (100.00%). Psychiatric patients were observed to have the highest proportion for accepted referrals with 8,170 requests (82.50%) followed by organ transplantations with 1,005 requests (80.92%). Sex was seen to be a significant predictor for referrals, where the odds of acceptances for females increased by 2% compared to their male counterparts (95% CI = 1.01-1.04). Also, proportion of acceptance was highest for the Eastern business unit compared to all other units. External referrals were 32% less likely to be accepted than internal referrals (95% CI = 0.67-0.69). Conclusion: The current findings indicate that the e-referral system is mostly able to cater to the health services of the most vulnerable of patients. However, there remains areas for health policy improvement, especially in terms of resource allocation.

Hospital referrals, exclusions from hospital care, and deaths among long-term care residents in the Community of Madrid during the March-April 2020 COVID-19 epidemic period: a multivariate time series analysis.

BACKGROUND: From March 7 to April 7, 2020, the Community of Madrid (CoM), Spain, issued interventions in response to the COVID-19 epidemic, including hospital referral triage protocols for long-term care facility (LTCF) residents (March 18-25). Those with moderate to severe physical disability and cognitive impairment were excluded from hospital referral. This research assesses changes in the association between daily hospital referrals and the deaths of LTCF residents attributable to the triage protocols. METHODS: Daily hospital referrals and all-cause mortality from January to June 2020 among LTCF residents and the CoM population aged 65 + were obtained. Significant changes in LTCF resident daily hospital referrals time series, and in-LTCF and in-hospital daily deaths, were examined with tests for breaks and regimes in time series. Multivariate time series analyses were conducted to test changes in the associations between LTCF resident hospital referrals with daily deaths in-hospital and in-LTCF, and in the CoM population aged 65 + when the triage protocols were implemented. RESULTS: Among LTCF residents, hospital referrals declined sharply from March 6 to March 23, 2020. Increases in LTCF residents' daily deaths occurred from March 7 to April 1, followed by a decrease reaching pre-epidemic levels after April 28. The daily ratio of in-hospital deaths to in-LTCF deaths reached its lowest values from March 9 to April 19, 2020. The four versions of the triage protocol, published from March 18 to March 25 had no impact on further changes in the association of hospital referrals with daily deaths of LTCF residents in-hospital or in-LTCF. CONCLUSIONS: While LTCF residents' deaths increased, hospital referrals of LTCF residents decreased with the introduction of the CoM governmental interventions on March 7. They were implemented before the enactment of the triage protocols, protecting hospitals from collapse while overlooking the need for standards of care within LTCFs. The CoM triage protocols sanctioned the existing restrictions on hospital referrals of LTCF residents.

Conscience, Caricatures, and Catholic Identities.

Catholic health care is often viewed as antithetical to secular conceptions of autonomy. This view can engender calls to protect "choice" in Catholic facilities. However, this view is built on a fundamental misunderstanding of the Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services (ERDs). This commentary, which responds to "Principled Conscientious Provision: Referral Symmetry and Its Implications for Protecting Secular Conscience," by Abram Brummett et al., seeks to demonstrate the nuance of the ERDs as well as to address some of the challenges various Catholic identities have when interpreting and living out the ERDs so that all patients receive high-quality, compassionate care. By highlighting the Church's desire to protect all people at every stage, I hope to dispel the caricatures that often result from misunderstandings by Catholics and non-Catholics alike.

Principled Conscientious Provision: Referral Symmetry and Its Implications for Protecting Secular Conscience.

"Conscientious provision" refers to situations in which clinicians wish to provide legal and professionally accepted treatments prohibited within their (usually Catholic) health care institutions. It mirrors "conscientious objection," which refers to situations in which clinicians refuse to provide legal and professionally accepted treatments offered within their (usually secular) health care institutions. Conscientious provision is not protected by law, but conscientious objection is. In practice, this asymmetry privileges conservative religious or moral values (usually associated with objection) over secular moral values (usually associated with provision). In this article, we first argue for a legal right to one kind of conscientious provision: referral for procedures prohibited at Catholic hospitals. We then argue that a premise in that argument-the principle of comparably trivial institutional burdens-justifies legal protections for some additional forms of conscientious provision that include, for example, writing prescriptions for contraception or medical abortions. However, this principle cannot justify legal protections for other forms of conscientious provision, for instance, the right to perform surgical abortions or gender-affirming hysterectomies at Catholic hospitals.

Referring wisely: knowing when and how to make subspecialty consultations in hospital medicine.

Subspecialty consultations are becoming highly prevalent in hospital medicine, due to an ageing population with multimorbid conditions and increasingly complex care needs, as well as medicolegal fears that lead to widespread defensive medical practices. Although timely subspecialty consultations in the appropriate clinical context have been found to improve clinical outcomes, there remains a significant proportion of specialty referrals in hospital medicine which are inappropriate, excessive, or do not add value to patient care. In this article, we sought to provide an overview of the common problems pertaining to excessive quantity and suboptimal quality of inpatient subspecialty consultations made in real-world practice and highlight their implications for healthcare financing and patient care. In addition, we discuss the underlying contributing factors that predispose to inappropriate use of the specialist referral system. Finally, we offer a practical, multitiered approach to help rationalize subspecialty consultations, through (i) a systematic model ('WISE' template) for individual referral-making, (ii) development of standardized healthcare institutional referral guidelines with routine clinical audits for quality control, (iii) adopting an integrated generalist care model, and (iv) incorporating training on effective referral-making in medical education.

Canadian Association of Radiologists Genitourinary Imaging Referral Guideline.

The Canadian Association of Radiologists (CAR) Genitourinary Expert Panel is made up of physicians from the disciplines of radiology, emergency medicine, family medicine, nephrology, and urology, a patient advisor, and an epidemiologist/guideline methodologist. After developing a list of 22 clinical/diagnostic scenarios, a rapid scoping review was undertaken to identify systematically produced referral guidelines that provide recommendations for one or more of these clinical/diagnostic scenarios. Recommendations from 30 guidelines and contextualization criteria in the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) for guidelines framework were used to develop 65 recommendation statements across the 22 scenarios (2 scenarios point to the CAR Obstetrics and Gynecology Diagnostic Imaging Referral Guideline). This guideline presents the methods of development and the referral recommendations for haematuria, hypertension, renal disease (or failure), renal colic, renal calculi in the absence of acute colic, renal lesion, urinary tract obstruction, urinary tract infection, scrotal mass, or pain, including testicular torsion, adrenal mass, incontinence, urgency, and frequency, chronic pelvic pain, elevated PSA, infertility, and pelvic floor.

Gatekeeping and referral of patients holding private health insurance: a survey among general practitioners in Norway.

OBJECTIVE: Private health insurance is becoming more common in Norway. The aim of this study was to investigate GPs' opinions on private health insurance, and their experiences from consultations where health insurance can affect decisions about referring. DESIGN: A web based cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Norwegian general practice. SUBJECTS: All GPs in Norway were in 2019 invited to participate in an online survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The GPs' opinions and experiences regarding health insurance were reported as proportions. Multiple logistic regression was used to test associations between how frequently GPs refer patients without further considerations and variables concerning their characteristics, opinions, and experiences. RESULTS: Of 1,309 GPs (response rate 27%), 93% stated that private health insurance raises the risk of overtreatment and 90% considered such insurance to contribute to inequality in health. Frequently being pressured to refer in the absence of a medical indication was reported by 42%. Moreover, 28% often or always chose to refer patients without further consideration, and this was associated with perceptions of pressure with an adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of 3.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.73-5.29, and unpleasant reactions from patients following refusals (AOR 1.63, 95% CI 1.14-2.33). CONCLUSION: Although most participating GPs associated private health insurance with overtreatment and inequality in health, more than one in four choose to refer without further consideration. GPs' experience of pressure to refer and negative reactions from patients when they consider referrals not to be medically indicated, raises the risk of medical overuse for patients holding private health insurance.

Although most GPs had negative opinions regarding private health insurance, more than one quarter frequently referred insurance holders without further considerations.Perceived pressure and negative reactions from patients were associated with accommodating requests rather than acting as a gatekeeper.Private health insurance challenges the gatekeeping role of GPs in Norway and raises the risk of medical overuse.

The Impact of a Nurse-Led High-Risk Referral Protocol Implemented in a Comprehensive Breast Center.

This quality improvement project implemented a nurse-led high-risk screening referral protocol for earlier identification of women at increased risk for breast cancer. The Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool was used at the ma.

Sex disparity in referral for catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AFCA) has been shown to reduce AF burden and improve quality of life. Earlier studies demonstrated that women are less likely to undergo AFCA despite having more AF symptoms. We investigated whether an association exists between referral patterns and this sex disparity. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of outpatients with newly diagnosed AF at a single tertiary referral center. Logistic regression models adjusted for socioeconomic and clinical factors were constructed to determine associations between sex and binary dependent variables including referrals to and visits with general cardiology and electrophysiology (EP) and AFCA utilization. RESULTS: Of 6850 patients analyzed, 2693 were women, and 4157 were men. No significant differences were found in odds of referral to (aOR, 1.13 [0.92-1.40], P = 0.25) or visits with (aOR, 1.05 [0.86-1.29], P = 0.62) general cardiologists between women and men. Women were found to be less likely to visit with EP than men (aOR, 0.88 [0.79-0.99], P = 0.03). In analyses of referral patterns after release of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guidelines, women were found to be referred to (aOR, 0.78 [0.63-0.95], P = 0.01) and visit with (aOR, 0.86 [0.75-0.99], P = 0.03) EP less frequently than men. Finally, no significant difference was found in likelihood to undergo AFCA between women and men (aOR, 1.05 [0.83-1.33], P = 0.67). CONCLUSIONS: This study uncovered significant differences in rates of referral to and visits with EP between women and men. Encouraging equitable referral to specialists and access to AFCA is essential in ensuring appropriate care for all patients.

Assessing the accuracy of substance use disorder treatment search tools: A cross-sectional analysis of national and state-level directories.

Background: Addressing the critical public health crisis of substance use disorder (SUD), this study evaluates the accuracy of SUD treatment search tools, such as FindTreatment.gov, to connect patients with appropriate care. Methods: To ensure geographic diversity, we randomly selected one state from four distinct US regions (Arizona, Florida, Massachusetts, Ohio) and then randomly selected counties of varying sizes (one large, two medium, three small) within each state using a random number generator. Contact information for practices was extracted from the tools and validated through phone calls. The primary outcome measures were exact accuracy rate (wherein all information was accurate) and functional accuracy rate (wherein enough information was provided to facilitate care establishment). Results: A total of 697 practices from within ten SUD treatment search tools were assessed. Accuracy of the ten SUD treatment search tools varied considerably, with exact accuracy rates ranging from 9.1 % to 76.0 % (mean: 56.0 %) and functional accuracy rates from 50.0 % to 92.0 % (mean: 82.8 %). National tools exhibited higher accuracy for both exact accuracy rate (66.3 % v. 49.0 %; p = 0.2864) and functional accuracy rate (83.8 % v. 82.2 %; p = 0.9148) than state tools, while privately funded tools demonstrated higher accuracy for both exact accuracy rates (66.8 % v. 48.9 %; p = 0.2008) and functional accuracy rates (83.8 % v. 82.2 %; p = 0.9148), but none of these differences were statistically significant. Conclusions: This study found that SUD treatment search tools commonly list inaccurate information, underscoring the need for systematic improvements in data management and validation practices.

Evaluating the Accuracy and Impact of the ESR-iGuide Decision Support Tool in Optimizing CT Imaging Referral Appropriateness.

Radiology referral quality impacts patient care, yet factors influencing quality are poorly understood. This study assessed the quality of computed tomography (CT) referrals, identified associated characteristics, and evaluated the ESR-iGuide clinical decision support tool's ability to optimize referrals. A retrospective review analyzed 300 consecutive CT referrals from an acute care hospital. Referral quality was evaluated on a 5-point scale by three expert reviewers (inter-rater reliability κ = 0.763-0.97). The ESR-iGuide tool provided appropriateness scores and estimated radiation exposure levels for the actual referred exams and recommended exams. Scores were compared between actual and recommended exams. Associations between ESR-iGuide scores and referral characteristics, including the specialty of the ordering physician (surgical vs. non-surgical), were explored. Of the referrals, 67.1% were rated as appropriate. The most common exams were head and abdomen/pelvis CTs. The ESR-iGuide deemed 70% of the actual referrals "usually appropriate" and found that the recommended exams had lower estimated radiation exposure compared to the actual exams. Logistic regression analysis showed that non-surgical physicians were more likely to order inappropriate exams compared to surgical physicians. Over one-third of the referrals showed suboptimal quality in the unstructured system. The ESR-iGuide clinical decision support tool identified opportunities to optimize appropriateness and reduce radiation exposure. Implementation of such a tool warrants consideration to improve communication and maximize patient care quality.

Evaluation of a Musculoskeletal Digital Assessment Routing Tool (DART): Crossover Noninferiority Randomized Pilot Trial.

BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal conditions account for 16% of global disability, resulting in a negative effect on patients and increasing demand for health care use. Triage directing patients to appropriate level intervention improving health outcomes and efficiency has been prioritized. We developed a musculoskeletal digital assessment routing tool (DART) mobile health (mHealth) system, which requires evaluation prior to implementation. Such innovations are rarely rigorously tested in clinical trials-considered the gold standard for evaluating safety and efficacy. This pilot study is a precursor to a trial assessing DART performance with a physiotherapist-led triage assessment. OBJECTIVE: The study aims to evaluate trial design, assess procedures, and collect exploratory data to establish the feasibility of delivering an adequately powered, definitive randomized trial, assessing DART safety and efficacy in an NHS primary care setting. METHODS: A crossover, noninferiority pilot trial using an integrated knowledge translation approach within a National Health Service England primary care setting. Participants were patients seeking assessment for a musculoskeletal condition, completing a DART assessment and the history-taking element of a face-to-face physiotherapist-led triage in a randomized order. The primary outcome was agreement between DART and physiotherapist triage recommendation. Data allowed analysis of participant recruitment and retention, randomization, blinding, study burden, and potential barriers to intervention delivery. Participant satisfaction was measured using the System Usability Scale. RESULTS: Over 8 weeks, 129 patients were invited to participate. Of these, 92% (119/129) proceeded to eligibility assessment, with 60% (78/129) meeting the inclusion criteria and being randomized into each intervention arm (39/39). There were no dropouts and data were analyzed for all 78 participants. Agreement between physiotherapist and DART across all participants and all primary triage outcomes was 41% (32/78; 95% CI 22-45), intraclass correlation coefficient 0.37 (95% CI 0.16-0.55), indicating that the reliability of DART was poor to moderate. Feedback from the clinical service team led to an adjusted analysis yielding of 78% (61/78; 95% CI 47-78) and an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.57 (95% CI 0.40-0.70). Participant satisfaction was measured quantitively using amalgamated System Usability Scale scores (n=78; mean score 84.0; 90% CI +2.94 to -2.94), equating to an "excellent" system. There were no study incidents, and the trial burden was acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: Physiotherapist-DART agreement of 78%, with no adverse triage decisions and high patient satisfaction, was sufficient to conclude DART had the potential to improve the musculoskeletal pathway. Study validity was enhanced by the recruitment of real-world patients and using an integrated knowledge translation approach. Completion of a context-specific consensus process is recommended to provide definitive definitions of safety criteria, range of appropriateness, noninferiority margin, and sample size. This pilot demonstrated an adequately powered definitive trial is feasible, which would provide evidence of DART safety and efficacy, ultimately informing potential for DART implementation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04904029; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04904029. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/31541.

Knowledge and Awareness of the orthodontic triage and its uses among dental healthcare professionals - a cross-sectional study.

INTRODUCTION: In orthodontics, the triage system is used to assess the preadolescents to rule out interventions needed earlier and to assess the nature of orthodontic problems as complex or moderate. The objective of this study was to determine the knowledge and awareness of orthodontic triage and its uses among dental healthcare professionals (DHCP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A triage awareness questionnaire (TAQ) was formulated and validated as reliable by a panel of five orthodontic specialists which was then circulated online among 400 DHCP. The questionnaire consisted of nine sections that assessed the current knowledge and usage of orthodontic triage among the dental community. Frequencies and percentages were reported for all categorical variables. Chi-square was used to assess the association among the variables. RESULTS: The response rate was 28.2% with the majority of participants being general dentists. Regarding the knowledge and use of triage, 40% of DHCP were only familiar with the word "orthodontic triage" while being unaware of how it works and 79% denied using orthodontic triage. Regarding the management of anomalies, 42% of DHCP preferred extraction as the management of supernumerary teeth (p = 0.013). Practitioners belonging to private setups performed visual inspection in growing patients for assessment of their facial features (p = 0.012). Clinicians with more than one year of experience referred young patients to orthodontic specialists for the management of crossbite (p = 0.024). Younger clinicians (25-35 years) with more than one year of experience referred adult patients to orthodontists for correction of their unesthetic smile (p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: This paper provides foundational data for the development of future policies and protocols supporting structured, evidence-based approaches to patient management via use of orthodontic triage. This study underscores the importance of targeted educational interventions to enhance understanding and implementation of orthodontic triage principles in clinical practice. Further probing is necessary to discern the disparity between understanding the orthodontic triage and effective employment of its components among practicing dental healthcare professionals.

Specialist referrals and diagnostic delays in motor neurone disease: Mapping patients' journey through hoops and hurdles in healthcare.

Motor neuron disease (MND) is an uncommon but invariably fatal condition, with a median survival of 24-48 months from symptom onset. Although there is no cure at the moment, early diagnosis is crucial to enable timely access to multidisciplinary care, and enrolment in clinical trials utilising investigational therapies. Unfortunately, diagnostic delays remain common, and the average delay between symptom onset and diagnosis is 12 months. Large numbers of specialist referrals have been suggested as a key contributor to diagnostic delays. We conducted a retrospective review of the medical records of patients diagnosed with MND in Lancashire and South Cumbria, to investigate whether large numbers of specialty referrals are a common occurrence in MND. Our review identified that 35% of patients with MND were seen by two or more specialties before being referred to neurology. This rose to 49% when patients with bulbar onset disease were considered. 9% of cases saw three or more specialists. There was a statistically significant correlation between the number of specialist referrals and delays in neurology referral. We hope our findings will increase awareness of the importance of early neurology referral in the diagnosis of MND and promote the use of the MND Red Flag tool as a means of identifying patients in need of prompt neurological evaluation.

Referral Patterns and Diagnostic Concordance in Pediatric Skin Disorders.

IMPORTANCE: This study explores referral patterns in pediatric dermatology and assesses the diagnostic concordance between referring and dermatology providers. METHOD: This retrospective cross-sectional study utilized referrals to an outpatient pediatric dermatology clinic. The review included patients referred between July 1, 2018 and June 30, 2019. Only patients who completed a clinic visit were included in the diagnostic concordance. Referral and first visit diagnoses were compared to determine concordance. RESULTS: A total of 8,682 charts were reviewed, and 3,738 completed a clinic visit. The most common referral diagnoses included atopic dermatitis, rash, lesion, melanocytic nevus, and warts. Physicians (78.5%) and APRNs (18.1%) most frequently referred patients. The diagnostic concordance of physicians was 67.1% vs 66.3% for APRNs. CONCLUSION: Physicians and APRNs showed similar rates of diagnostic concordance, yet a large proportion of diagnoses were discordant. Primary care providers may benefit from focused education around the most commonly referred and missed diagnoses.

[Low back pain and referral to the spine specialist: situation and resources in Buenos Aires]. / Lumbalgia y derivación al especialista de columna: situación y recursos en hospitales públicos de la Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires.

INTRODUCTION: 90% of cases of acute low back pain have no specific underlying cause. International guidelines are available to help identify those individuals who require specialized care. However, in our country, there is a limited emphasis on primary healthcare, with the primary focus on hospital-based care. The aim of this study is to provide an overview of the diagnostic and therapeutic resources utilized in the initial care of patients experiencing low back pain at their first consultation with a specialist physician. METHODS: Descriptive and cross-sectional study, with prospective data collection through a questionnaire administered to patients experiencing low back pain during their first visit to a specialist's office. RESULTS: A total of 44 patients were included, with an average age of 53 years; 50% sought medical attention for chronic pain. Informal referrals were associated with the referring physician's specialty (non-orthopedic), patients with a higher number of emergency department visits, and longer waiting times to obtain the consultation; 52% of patients arrived with at least one complementary study. CONCLUSION: Most of the referrals were appropriate; however, informal referrals were more common. Only 1/5 of the patients underwent an physical examination, and less than 30% of those with red flag symptoms presented with suitable complementary studies. The median waiting time for the consultation was 24 days.

Introducción: El 90% de las lumbalgias agudas son de causa inespecífica. Existen guías internacionales que permiten identificar a aquellos pacientes que requieren atención especializada. En nuestro país la orientación a la atención primaria de la salud es escasa, centrada principalmente en la atención en los hospitales. El objetivo del presente estudio fue describir los recursos de salud, diagnósticos y terapéuticos, utilizados en la atención inicial de pacientes con dolor lumbar que acuden a la consulta del médico especialista Métodos: Estudio descriptivo y transversal, con recolección prospectiva de los datos a través de un cuestionario destinado a pacientes con dolor lumbar que acuden por primera vez a la consulta especializada. Resultados: Se incluyeron 44 pacientes, edad media 53 años; 50% concurrió por dolor crónico. La derivación informal se asoció con: especialidad de derivación (no traumatólogo), pacientes con mayor número de consultas a guardia y mayor demora en obtener la consulta. El 52% concurrió con al menos un estudio complementario. Conclusión: La mayor parte de las derivaciones fueron correctas, sin embargo, predominó la derivación informal. Solo 1/5 de los pacientes fue examinado y menos del 30% de los pacientes con banderas rojas acudió con estudios complementarios adecuados. La mediana del tiempo de espera para la consulta fue 24 días.

Vision Screenings and Ophthalmology Referrals Among a Sample of Pediatricians in Florida.

Introduction In Florida, mandated school vision screenings begin around the age of five. However, a joint statement in the ophthalmology community recommends that primary care providers, including pediatricians, screen for eye and vision symptoms and signs starting at birth. This suggests that pediatricians may be the first to catch signs of early vision loss and refer pediatric patients to an ophthalmologist. This study aims to understand the current vision screening practices of a sample of pediatricians in Florida and how comfort levels with vision screenings may impact ophthalmology referrals. Methods A survey with 36 questions was created by the authors of the study and sent to pediatricians through digital newsletters to the Florida Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics and pediatric departments at Florida universities. Descriptive statistics were gathered regarding the demographics of pediatricians surveyed, vision screening attitudes and practices, vision concerns and ophthalmology referrals from pediatric clinics, and the most common reasons for referral to an ophthalmologist. The Jonckheere-Terpstra nonparametric trend test was used to examine whether decreased comfort performing vision screening on a child was associated with lower rates of urgent referrals to an optometrist or ophthalmologist. Results Forty-six responses were collected. Seventy-eight percent of pediatricians reported performing early childhood vision screening (n=36). There was considerable variability in vision screening practices among the pediatricians studied, with only 66% beginning screenings from zero to two years of age (n=24). Fifty percent of respondents reported receiving no previous training on performing vision screening, and less than half of respondents reported feeling "somewhat comfortable" or "extremely comfortable" with performing the exam (n=22, 48%). The trend between decreased comfort performing pediatric vision screening and lower rates of urgent eye care referrals was approaching statistical significance (p=0.0705). The majority of urgent referrals were provided by respondents who were somewhat or extremely comfortable with screening (n=13, 65%). Conclusion From this sample of pediatricians in Florida, most respondents reported performing early childhood vision screening, but there was notable variability in the way screenings were performed among pediatricians. Moreover, many had never received training on performing the exam or did not feel comfortable performing them. Decreased comfort with vision screenings was almost significantly associated with decreased urgent referrals to an ophthalmologist. Future studies should examine whether increased training on vision screenings may help improve standardization of screening practices among pediatrics and comfort with vision screenings.