Impact of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux in Patients with Voice Disorders.

Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the presence of laryngopharyngeal reflux in patients with voice disorders thereby aiding in the early management and improving the quality of life. Study Design: Cross Sectional study. Methods: This cross sectional study was carried out in a tertiary care hospital, patients with history of voice change for more than 3 weeks were included, and divided into 4 groups depending upon the level of voice use. Patients were asked to fill Koufmann Reflux Symptom Index questionnaire followed by video laryngoscopy and findings were plotted according to Reflux Finding Score. Based on the scoring, impact of LPRD in patient with voice disorders was analysed. Results: Among the 90 study participants, 74 (82.2%) were found to have LPRD. The mean age was 42.76 ± 10.33 years. Majority (43.2%) belong to the age group of 41-50 years, with female predominance (70.3%). Majority (41.9%) of them were level IV voice users. 59.5% were positive Koufman reflex symptom index, 67.6% were positive Reflex finding score. Hoarseness (58.1%) the most common symptom. Conclusion: Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease has to be considered in patients presenting with hoarseness of voice for more than three weeks. Simple and highly reproducible scores like Reflux Symptom Index and Reflux Finding Score proven useful and valuable tools in diagnosing LPRD thereby aiding in early diagnosis and prompt management and improves the patient's quality of life. Level of Evidence: Level 1.

Exploring the Substantive Significance of Laryngoscopic Observations as Reliable Prognostic Indicators for the Therapeutic Efficacy in Cases of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux.

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) can be defined as the regurgitation of gastric acid and peptic substances into the laryngeal and hypopharyngeal regions, even in the case of a singular occurrence. A substantial body of recent research underscores the significance of non-acid reflux as a notable contributor to LPR symptoms. This current investigation delves into the assessment of laryngoscopic observations in their predictive capacity regarding the therapeutic outcomes of empirically administered proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy in the context of LPR. In this study, 145 patients who had received a clinical diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) underwent rigorous laryngoscopic examinations. These patients were subsequently categorized into three distinct groups based on the Belafsky reflux findings score, which included the criteria for normal (scores ranging from 0 to 7), mild to moderate (scores ranging from 8 to 16), and moderate to severe (scores ranging from 17 to 26). Among the participants, 12 individuals from the normal group, 44 from the mild to moderate group, and 31 from the moderate to severe group reported experiencing a noteworthy alleviation of symptoms following a three-month period of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy and lifestyle adjustments. It is important to note that these findings yielded statistically significant results. Preliminary laryngoscopic observations hold significant potential as predictors of favourable treatment outcomes in the context of empirical proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy for laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR).

Reflux Symptom Index (RSI), Videolaryngostroboscopy and Voice Analysis: A Triad of Non-Invasive Tools to Study Treatment Outcomes of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease (LPRD).

Study post treatment improvement of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease (LPRD) using non-invasive tools of Reflux symptom index (RSI), Reflux finding score (RFS) grading of videolaryngostroboscopy (VLS) and voice analysis. This study from December 2020 to April 2022 enrolled 100 adults with complaints suggestive of reflux symptoms and having Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) more than 13. All patients underwent VLS along with voice analysis. VLS findings were graded using Reflux Finding Score (RFS). Patients were advised for lifestyle modifications and proton pump inhibitors for 8 weeks when post treatment RSI, VLS and voice analyses were again documented. The age range was from 18 to 75 years. Males predominated. Lifestyle modification compliance was seen in 85% of the patients. We found a significant association (P = 0.001) for difference in pretreatment and posttreatment for both Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) parameters & Reflux Finding Score Index (RFS) parameters. Voice analysis pre and post treatment showed a significant association (P = 0.001) for fundamental frequency, jitter, shimmer, harmonic-to-noise ratio and maximum phonation time. The gold standard of diagnosis of LPRD is 24 h pH monitoring but has many false negatives and false positives due to intermittent reflux and inaccurate probe placement. This costly, time consuming and invasive procedure is not widely available amongst our speciality. Excellent visualisation of VLS allowed accurate RFS calculation. Voice analysis permitted early diagnosis of LPRD induced hoarseness before it became clinically significant. It also documented the treatment outcome. We conclude that an 8-weeks proton pump inhibitor treatment combined with lifestyle modification resulted in a significant improvement in the parameters of the non-invasive tools of RSI and RFS and voice analysis.

Characterization of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux in the Elderly Population.

INTRODUCTION: Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) often is not diagnosed due to its presentation without heartburn. The aim of this study was to analyze the signs and symptoms of elderly patients undergoing treatment for LPR using subjective as well as objective measures including strobovideolaryngoscopies, 24-hour pH studies, and manometry to highlight appropriate considerations for diagnosis and treatment. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux who were seen from January 2010 to February 2021 in the practice of the senior author (Robert T. Sataloff) who had undergone 24-hour pH testing, and for whom all data were available. Patients aged 60 years and older were considered elderly and compared to patients younger than 40 and between the ages of 40 and 59. However, patients in their 60s, 70s, and 80s were evaluated and compared separately. Objective reflux findings, 24-hour pH studies, and manometry were compared between groups. RESULTS: Two hundred and eighty-eight patients being treated for LPR were included, 100 of whom were over the age of 60. While 94.1% of patients younger than 40 had a chief complaint of hoarseness, 71% percent of those aged 60 and older complained of hoarseness. Patients aged 60 and older were more likely to present with no voice complaint as their age increased (P = 0.001). Lower esophageal sphincter residual pressure was 12.15 ±â€¯6.28 in elderly patients compared to 4.90 ±â€¯3.38 in patients younger than 40 (P < 0.001). Upper esophageal sphincter (UES) basal pressure was decreased in elderly patients at 83.84 ±â€¯50.53 compared to 105.92 ±â€¯51.49 in patients younger than 60 or younger (P = 0.029). Older patients in their 70s and 80s also had lower UES basal pressures at 75.79 ±â€¯47.66 and 63.45 ±â€¯14.50 (P = 0.003). Additionally, while 71.4% of patients younger than 40 had normal esophageal motility (Chicago classification v4), only 40% of elderly patients had normal esophageal motility (P < 0.001). More severe ventricular obliteration also was present in elderly patients compared to non-elderly patients (P = 0.032), and thick endolaryngeal mucus was less likely to be present in elderly patients (P = 0.007). Reflux finding score differed between age groups with patients aged less than 40 scoring 14.78 ±â€¯2.5, 40-59 year olds scoring 15.83 ±â€¯2.13 and patients 60 and older scoring 15.48 ±â€¯2.43 (P = 0.018). CONCLUSION: Elderly patients diagnosed with LPR have different presentations of the disease compared with younger patients.

The Relation Between Endoscopic and Subjective Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Signs, Vocal Tract Discomfort, Voice Handicap, and Voice Disorder Type: Same Yet Different?

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the relation between subjective voice-related symptoms and endoscopic findings in patients with different etiology of voice disorder and vocally healthy subjects with and without laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study. METHODS: The study involved 149 participants (106 female, 43 male) including 125 with various voice disorders (functional, structural, and neurogenic) and 24 vocally healthy individuals. For self-rating the German versions of the Voice Handicap Index (VHI), Vocal Tract Discomfort (VTD) Scale, and Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) were applied, while endoscopic evaluations utilized the Reflux Finding Score (RFS) and Reflux Sign Assessment (RSA). Statistical analyses incorporated ANOVA with Bonferroni posthoc tests to identify group variations. Correlations between VTD Scale, VHI, RSI, RFS, and RSA were evaluated using Pearson's correlation coefficient. To examine test sensitivity and specificity for the VTD Scale and RSA, we performed a receiver operating characteristics analysis. Youden's-Index was applied to determine the cut-off-value with best discriminatory abilities. The diagnosis of LPR was assumed when the criteria of RFS > 7 AND RSI > 13 was met. RESULTS: Significant differences for all voice diagnosis groups and vocally healthy individuals for RFS and all three self-rating questionnaires were found. Moreover, there was significant correlation between VTD Scale and VHI and RSI as well as RSI and RFS, which was moderate, negative in the group of persons with LPR. However, there was no significant difference for RSA results between the vocally healthy or any diagnosis group. CONCLUSION: Thus, the RFS may be more suitable to predict reflux and voice-related symptoms. The VTD Scale is a useful instrument in screening voice disorders but also LPR and can therefore be used as a tool for decision-making when transferring to a specialist.

Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Scoring in a Pediatric Population.

In recent years, the prevalence of laryngopharyngeal reflux has risen, especially among pediatric patients. The diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux relies on patient history and clinical assessment using the Reflux Finding Score and Reflux Symptom Index as crucial diagnostic tools. Some studies have proposed a link between pepsin and laryngopharyngeal reflux, potentially triggering palatine tonsil hypertrophy. Our study aimed to investigate the correlation between laryngeal and pharyngeal manifestations of laryngopharyngeal reflux through two questionnaires and the presence of pepsin in saliva and palatine tonsils in a pediatric population. Pepsin in saliva was detected using a Western blot method, while immunohistochemistry assessed its presence in palatine tonsils. Although no statistically significant differences in Reflux Finding Score and Reflux Symptom Index were found between the immunohistochemistry-positive (IHC-positive) and immunohistochemistry-negative (IHC-negative) groups, median reflux symptom index and Reflux Finding Score values consistently trended higher in the IHC-positive group. This suggests a potential connection between elevated index values and pepsin presence in tonsillar tissue. Further investigations are essential to fully comprehend the clinical implications of these findings.

Outpatient Clinical Markers for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease: A Correlational Study.

Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) is the result of retrograde flow of gastric contents to the laryngopharynx which comes in contact with tissues of the upper aerodigestive tract. Due to ill defined criteria for diagnosis & followup, LPRD patients are underdiagnosed & undertreated. Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) and the Reflux Finding Score (RFS) are two clinical methods which can be utilised especially in the outpatient setup. This study was done with the aim to assess various laryngoscopic findings in patients with LPRD diagnosed symptomatically and examine the correlation between the RSI & RFS by comparing these two indices. This prospective analytical study was conducted at a tertiary care centre in Bangalore in the Department of ENT for a period of 24 months between Dec 2020 to Dec 2022. The study included patients aged 18 to 60 years diagnosed with LPRD based on symptoms as per RSI score (> 13). RSI & RFS were assessed on diagnosis and patients were followed up for 1, 3 & 6 months for assessment. Total 96 patients were enrolled, with mean age of be 42.49 ± 11.33 years. Prevalence was found to be more in females (61.5%). The most common symptom according to RSI was frequent throat clearing & globus sensation (sensation of something sticking in throat) and most common finding according to RFS was erythema/hyperemia. The mean score of RSI and RFI was found to reduce with treatment at different intervals in follow-up visits. There was a significant strength of association between the RSI and RFS at baseline, 1st month, 3rd month and 6th month of follow-up (r = 0.568, r = 0.684, r = 0.774, r = 0.736 respectively) (p < 0.001).The RFS and RSI showed statistically significant strong relationships between total scores and sign and symptom characteristics. On follow-up, there was a significant reduction in the RSI which was also correlated with a reduction in RFS.

Clinical Evaluation of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux and its Response to Proton Pump Inhibitors.

Aim: To clinically evaluate the patients of laryngopharyngeal reflux(LPR) and their response to Proton Pump Inhibitors(PPIs) using laryngeal Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) and Reflux Finding Score (RFS). Method: This prospective observational study was conducted on 128 patients attending the ENT-OPD of VSSIMSAR,Burla,India, who had persistent laryngeal symptoms for more than 2 months.Data was collected using standardized RSI and RFS after taking detailed history and laryngoscopic examination.Patients who were diagnosed of LPR on the basis of their RSI & RFS were subjected to treatment with PPI-Pantoprazole & were called back for follow up at 2nd, 4th and 6th months.Pre and post treatment RSI & RFS were compared using appropriate statistical tests and results with p-value< 0.01 were considered statistically significant. Results: The overall effect of PPIs on all symptoms & signs of LPR,included in RSI and RFS respectively,is statistically significant except on swallowing (not statistically significant at p <0.01) showing a careful usage of RSI & RFS while diagnosing LPR clinically.Study also elucidated that PPI are effective in relieving symptoms of LPR patients.Evaluating Pearson correlation coefficient,the value of R=0.3717;R2 =0.1382 shows low positive correlation between the RSI & RFS.RSI & RFS are related to each other and any change in the RSI will affect the value of RFI and vice versa. Conclusion: From this study we conclude that LPR is prevalent in age of 28-37 years & has female preponderance.PPIs are effective in treating LPR.Though RSI and RFS are effective and valid parameters for managing LPR cases but have to be used cautiously while interpreting the results.

To Determine the Prevalence of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux in Patients of Various Throat Disorders and to Evaluate the Efficacy of Anti-reflux Therapy.

To study the prevalence of Laryngopharyngeal reflux in individuals having throat complaints by applying the Reflux Symptom Index and Reflux finding score as a prognostic tool after anti reflux therapy. Materials and Methods: A Cross-sectional study of 75 patients of age 18 years and above with clinical diagnosis of Laryngopharyngeal reflux was conducted in ENT. Cases were examined with detailed history and thorough examination with indirect laryngoscopy and Hopkins 70 degree endoscope. Symptoms and findings of patients were assessed by Belafsky Reflux Symptom Index and Reflux Finding Score. Patients presenting Belafsky Reflux Symptom Index > 13 and also Reflux Finding Score > 7 were classified as having Laryngopharyngeal reflux. After 6 weeks of treatment, patients were reassessed and Reflux Symptom Index and Reflux finding score were calculated. Results: The mean age of the study subjects was 37.12 ± 12.39 years. Most common symptom reported based on RSI questionnaire was excessive throat mucus (81.33%) followed by clearing of throat (75%) and coughing on lying down and heartburn. Based on the Laryngoscopy, about 57.33% had thick endolarygeal mucus, 56% had diffuse erythema, 45.33% had granulations and 29.33% had subglottic edema. Based on the reflux symptom scores, we found 53.33% and 80% of patients based on reflux findings score to have Laryngopharyngeal Reflux. The mean Reflux Symptom Index scores were 16.25 ± 5.53 and 10.73 ± 4.40 and also the mean Reflux Finding scores were 13.81 ± 2.42 and 6.61 ± 2.16 respectively before and after the treatment which was statistically significant.

Role of Reflux Symptom Index and Reflux Finding Score in Diagnosing Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: A Prospective Study.

Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease (LPRD) is caused due to reflux of gastric content into the larynx and pharynx. The present study was done to assess the role of Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) and Reflux Finding Score (RFS) in the treatment outcomes in symptomatic patients with LPRD. This is a prospective analytical study conducted on 200 patients for a period of 2 years, from January 2020 to February 2022. Patients suspected with LPR were evaluated using RSI and RFS, and both pre and post treatment scores were compared to assess the change in scores of RSI and RFS following 8 weeks of treatment with PPI (Proton pump inhibitor). The patients experienced a greater incidence of moderate symptoms in RSI. Wilcoxon signed-rank test showed significant difference between pre and post treatment scores with respect to reflux symptoms and reflux findings (p < 0.05). Implementation of RSI and RFS scoring system helped for early diagnosis of LPR, and a significant difference was seen between pre and post treatment scores in both RSI and RFS.

[The application progress on diagnostic scales of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease].

At present, objective methods for diagnosing laryngopharyngeal reflux disease(LPRD) are not minimally invasive, effective, and economical. Diagnostic scales are widely used worldwide due to the advantages of inexpensive, noninvasive, and easy to operate. The reflux symptom index(RSI) and the reflux finding score(RFS) are preferred to use in clinical diagnosis. However, many controversies have appeared in the application of RSI and RFS in recent years, causing many troubles to clinical diagnosis. Therefore, this review briefly discusses the problems of RSI and RFS in clinical applications to provide reference for diagnosing LPRD accurately.

Diagnosing Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: A Comparison between 24-hour pH-Impedance Testing and Pharyngeal Probe (Restech) Testing, with Introduction of the Sataloff Score.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic utility of pH monitoring using 24-hour esophageal pH-Impedance (HEMII-pH) testing versus pharyngeal pH (Restech) testing (Respiratory Technology Corporation, Houston, Texas) for diagnosing laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). METHODS: Retrospectively, patients were reviewed who had completed a Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) survey and stroboscopy within 60 days before or after undergoing simultaneous esophageal pH-Impedance monitoring and Restech testing. Reflux Finding Score (RFS) was determined by 4 blinded observers. 80.45% of patients were on anti-reflux medications at the time of study and had incomplete response to treatment for reflux. Improvement on reflux treatment was determined by evaluating presenting pre-pH monitoring RFS, post treatment RFS, and improvement of symptoms. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to assess relationships among RSI, RFS, and test results from HEMII-pH and Restech tests. RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients were included in the analysis. The inter-rater reliability of the RFS determination was 74.57%, and the intra-rater reliability was 67.00%. Subjects who had a positive RYAN Score had a significant correlation with RFS (r of 0.222 and p-value of 0.0492). There was no correlation between RFS and number or percent time of reflux events, longest event, total number of events, or percent of time at alkaline pH for either HEMII-PH or Restech test. RSI correlated better with HEMII-pH test than with Restech for percent time spent in both upright (r of 0.226 and p-value of 0.029) and supine position (r of 0.261 and a p-value of 0.032). Restech correlated better with total patient symptom Scores including cough, heartburn, burping, and throat clearing, with a r of 0.242 and a p-value of 0.048. Restech detected more percent time in reflux for total reflux, supine reflux, and upright reflux (p-value less than 0.0001). Restech also detected longer event times than Impedance (p-value of less than 0.0001). When diagnosis of LPR is based on the definition of CRC, the Sataloff Score test had 70.45% sensitivity and 80.95% specificity. The RYAN Score had a sensitivity of 72%, and a specificity of 56.45%, and the Wu Score had a sensitivity of 62.16%, and specificity of 54.05%. When the Sataloff and Wu Score were used together, the sensitivity was 71.45%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value of 100%, and a negative predictive value of 59.46%. CONCLUSION: The amount of time of reflux events correlates with symptoms better than the number of events. The HEMII-pH test was able to detect more events of pH<4 than Restech, possibly because there might have been more acid events below than above the upper esophageal sphincter, while Restech detected more total events. Restech recorded longer event times than HEMII-pH test. Since length of time correlates with RFS (probably reflecting laryngeal inflammation), and since laryngeal clearance of acid is more similar to pharyngeal than esophageal clearance, this finding might prove valuable clinically. The Sataloff Score has a sensitivity of 70.45%, and a specificity of 80.95% and appears useful clinically to detect mild to moderate that is missed by the RYAN Score. A combination of Sataloff Score and Wu Score may be clinically valuable to identify LPR with an increased sensitivity of 71.45% and increased specificity of 100%. The Wu Score is not yet available for the general clinical use, but the Sataloff Score is.

The Validity and Reliability of the Reflux Finding Score.

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) disease is common. The incidence of newly diagnosed cases has increased substantially due to awareness and development of new diagnostic measurements. The reflux finding score (RFS) and reflux symptom index (RSI) are believed to be useful in the assessment process, including after the initiation of therapy. However, many authors have suggested concerns about the reliability and validity of the RFS. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity and reliability of the RFS. METHODS: Ninety-two patients diagnosed with LPR who had undergone 24-hour pH-Impedance tests were included. All patients underwent stroboscopy and 24-Hour pH-Impedance monitoring within thirty days. Fifty-nine patients filled out a RSI prior to stroboscopic exam. The RFS was determined by four blinded observers: one otolaryngology resident, two laryngology fellows, and one laryngologist. Stroboscopic images were reviewed again one year later to assess intrarater reliability. RFS and RSI were correlated with 24-hour pH Impedance testing. RESULTS: The Kappa value between reviewers was 0.479. The percent agreement of the four observers for total RFS was 74.04%.The percent agreement between reviewers for subglottic edema was 78.77%; for ventricular obliteration was 65.55%; for erythema/hyperemia was 69.62%, for vocal fold edema was 68.32%; for diffuse laryngeal edema was 66.86%, for posterior commissure hypertrophy was 73.54%; for granuloma/granulation was 96.80%; for thick endolaryngeal mucus was 72.81%. The intrarater reliability of the four observers for total RFS was 67.5% with an intrarater reliability range of 50%-90%. The intrarater reliability for subglottic edema was 85% with a range of 70%-100%; for ventricular obliteration was 77.50% with a range of 70%-90%; for erythema/hyperemia was 65.00% with a range of 50%-90%; for vocal fold edema was 52.50% with a range of 30%-70%; for diffuse laryngeal edema was 62.50% with a range of 20%-80%; for posterior commissure hypertrophy was 52.50% with a range of 10%-80%; for granuloma/granulation was 100%; for thick endolaryngeal mucus was 55.00% with a range of 10%-90%. There was no correlation between RFS and any parameter of the 24-Hr pH-Impedance Test. RSI had a significant correlation with number of upright events (r value of 0.271, R2 of 0.0733 and P-value of 0.037), total symptoms experienced (r value of 0.0.267, R2 of 0.0715 and P-value of 0.041), and symptom correlation score (r value of -0.297, R2 of 0.0884 and P-value of 0.022). CONCLUSION: Many authors have expressed concerns about the reliability and validity of the RFS. In our study we found a fair/substantial interrater reliability, and a modest intra-rater reliability. We found no correlation between the RFS and 24-Hr pH Impedance testing. This study suggests that the concerns about the validity and reliability of the RFS may be warranted. This widely used clinical score should be interpreted with caution and further research and refinement should be considered.

Association between secretory otitis media and laryngopharygeal reflux in adults.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between Secretory Otitis Media (SOM) and Laryngopharygeal Reflux (LPR) hasn't been well investigated in adult. PURPOSE: To study the involvement of LPR- in adult SOM. METHODS: We analyzed 60 adult SOM patients who were admitted to Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, China from January 2022 to October 2022. First, we instructed the patients to fill Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) form and Reflux Finding Score (RFS). Second, Dx-ph monitor was used to monitor patients' oropharyngeal PH for 24 h. Finally, we obtained Ryan index based on the characteristics of reflux events in different body postures. In addition, all patients were evaluated by the Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire-7 (ETDQ-7). RESULTS: The positive rate of RSI and/or RFS scale was 73.33% (44/60) in 60 SOM patients. The positive rate of Ryan index was 76.67% (46/60), and the index was the highest in upright position in 60 SOM patients. The positive rate of ETDQ-7 was 100% (46/46) in 46 SOM patients with LPR. CONCLUSION: LPR may be involved in SOM in adults by impairing the function of the eustachian tube.

The application progress on diagnostic scales of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease / 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志

At present, objective methods for diagnosing laryngopharyngeal reflux disease(LPRD) are not minimally invasive, effective, and economical. Diagnostic scales are widely used worldwide due to the advantages of inexpensive, noninvasive, and easy to operate. The reflux symptom index(RSI) and the reflux finding score(RFS) are preferred to use in clinical diagnosis. However, many controversies have appeared in the application of RSI and RFS in recent years, causing many troubles to clinical diagnosis. Therefore, this review briefly discusses the problems of RSI and RFS in clinical applications to provide reference for diagnosing LPRD accurately.

The Role of Empirical Treatment with Proton Pump Inhibitor as a Diagnostic Tool in Laryngopharyngeal Reflux.

The presentations of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) are diverse and include chronic hoarseness, sensation of foreign body in the throat, sore throat etc. 24 h pH monitoring considered the gold standard of investigation for LPR is costly, cumbersome and not readily available at all centers. Empirical trial of Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) as a diagnostic tool after assessment by Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) and Reflux Findings Score (RFS) is a cheaper, simple and readily available alternative. The objectives of the study were to determine clinical manifestations in patients presenting with LPR and to evaluate the role of empirical treatment with PPI as a diagnostic tool in LPR. 100 patients were divided into experimental group (RSI ≥ 13 and RFS ≥ 7) and control group (RSI < 13 and RFS < 7). Omeprazole trial was given to experimental group and assessed for RSI and RFS at 04 and 08 weeks. Statistical analysis was done within the group and between the groups. (1) The response rate to Omeprazole at 04 and 08 weeks interval (RSI<13 and/or RFS<7) was 60% and 76% respectively. (2) The response to Omeprazole given to the experimental group with RSI≥13 and RFS≥7 was significant at 04 weeks and 08 weeks duration (P<0.0001). RSI and RFS are good clinical tools to assess and diagnose patients with Laryngopharyngeal reflux. Based on the clinical diagnosis an empirical trial of a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) can be given to patients for duration of 02 months resulting in a good response.

Comparison of Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) with Reflux Finding Score (RFS) and Its Effectiveness in Diagnosis of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease (LPRD).

LPRD is a common condition in patients attending ENT OPDs. Although esophageal manometry and 24 h pH monitoring is considered the gold standard for diagnosis, it is an expensive and time consuming investigation. Newer clinical scales have been developed for diagnosing LPR such as RSI, RFS, Carlsson-Dent, ReQuest, GerdQ, etc. The objective of the study is to compare RSI with RFS and to establish its effectiveness in diagnosing LPRD among OPD patients. It's a descriptive cross-sectional study. ENT outpatients with features of LPRD were asked to fill RSI proforma (score ≥ 13 abnormal), after which they were subjected to indirect laryngoscopy to obtain the RFS (score ≥ 7 diagnostic of LPRD). RSI was compared with RFS. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy of RSI were noted. Of 165 patients, 53.9% were females. Mean RSI scores in males and females were 11.9 and 11.5 and mean RFS scores were 6.4 and 5.7 respectively. RSI had 79.1% sensitivity and 83.7% specificity in diagnosing LPRD with PPV 76.8%, NPV 85.4% and accuracy 81.8% (Chi square value 64.5, p ≤ 0.01). There was substantial agreement between RSI and RFS (Cohen's kappa: 0.625, p ≤ 0.0001). RSI is a simple tool to diagnose LPRD which doesn't mandate invasive procedures such as endoscopy or esophageal manometry. Hence it can be used effectively to diagnose LPRD in ENT outpatients and start the treatment at the earliest.

Laryngopharyngeal Reflux in Obstructive Sleep Apnea-Hypopnea Syndrome: An Updated Meta-Analysis.

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is a common disorder in patients with obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS). This meta-analysis was carried out to evaluate the LPR prevalence in individuals with OSAHS and to analyze the correlation of LPR positivity with the clinical features of patients with OSAHS. A detailed review of the English and Chinese literature on the occurrence of LPR in patients with OSAHS was performed by employing online search tools such as PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, VIP, CNKI, WanFang, etc. Two researchers analyzed the studies for quality according to the STROBE standard checklist. The acquired data were analyzed using Stata 11.0 and R 3.6.1 software. The effect size was estimated and calculated using weighted mean difference (WMD) and correlation coefficients. Moreover, a combined analysis was performed by employing either a random- or fixed-effects model. Ultimately, 27 studies met our inclusion criteria. Our study revealed that the LPR prevalence in OSAHS patients was 49%. We carried out subgroup analyses as per OSAHS severity, ethnicity, and body mass index (BMI). The results suggested that the probability of LPR in European and American patients with OSAHS was higher, and the prevalence of LPR was higher in obese individuals and patients with severe OSAHS. Moreover, apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and BMI were higher in LPR-positive OSAHS patients than in LPR-negative OSAHS patients, but no significant variation in age was observed in the two groups. Moreover, the reflux symptom index (RSI) scores and the reflux finding score (RFS) exhibited a positive correlation with AHI. The current literature shows a higher incidence of LPR in individuals with OSAHS (49%). The severity of AHI in individuals with OSAHS is associated with the presence of LPR. Patients with OSAHS accompanied by LPR showed higher BMI and AHI as compared to those patients with LPR-negative OSAHS.

Clinical Implications of the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire and Reflux Symptom Index in Patients With Suspected Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Symptoms.

Background/Aims: To evaluate the usefulness of gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire (GerdQ) and reflux symptom index (RSI) for diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in patients with suspected laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) symptoms (cough, hoarseness, globus, and throat pain). Methods: A total of 98 patients with LPR symptoms were incorporated from either gastroenterology or otorhinolaryngology clinic. Patient's laryngoscopic findings were graded by reflux finding score (RFS), and RFS ≥ 7 was considered as positive LPR. Erosive esophagitis on endoscopy or abnormal results on ambulatory impedance-pH monitoring were used as diagnostic criteria for GERD. Esophageal motor function was evaluated using high-resolution esophageal manometry. Results: Ninety-three (94.9%) of the 98 subjects were diagnosed as LPR by RFS, but only 15 (15.3%) had GERD. For GerdQ, the cutoff value of 9 showed the highest area under curve (AUC) to diagnose GERD by receiver operating curve analysis (AUC = 0.565); the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were unsatisfactory (50.0%, 70.7%, 22.6%, and 89.2%, respectively.) RSI also showed poor performance in diagnosing GERD; the cutoff value of 25 showed the highest yield (AUC = 0.581); the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 42.9%, 79.3%, 26.1%, and 89.0%, respectively. Ineffective esophageal motility was frequently observed (69 of 98, 70.4%), but there was no difference in esophageal motility parameters between GERD and non-GERD patients. Conclusions: In patients with LPR symptoms, significant discrepancies are observed between laryngoscopic diagnosis and GERD. In this population, neither GerdQ nor RSI is useful in diagnosing GERD.

Reflux Symptom Index: Translation to the Kazakh Language and Validation.

BACKGROUND: This research focuses on the translation and validation of the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) in Kazakh language and the comparison of its results among patients with symptoms of Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and without LPR symptoms. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to translate and validate the RSI in Kazakh language (Kz-RSI). METHODS: The RSI from the original American English version has been translated according to standard procedures into Kazakh language. The study included 248 patients, 124 LPR patients, and 124 asymptomatic controls. A final version of the Kz-RSI was tested twice: on Day 0 and Day 14 for participants without LPR symptoms and on Day 0 and posttreatment for those with LPR symptoms. Reliability, validity, and internal consistency of test-retest were calculated. RESULTS: The Cronbach's alpha value for Kz-RSI was 0.94, indicating excellent internal consistency. The single measurement absolute agreement of the interclass correlation coefficient was 0.90 (95% confidence interval [0.86; 0.93]), which indicates good retest reliability. The total Kz-RSI scores and each item were significantly higher in the LPR group than in the control group (P < 0.001). In the posttreatment LPR patient group, the Kz-RSI scores for each item and overall were significantly lower than the pretreatment scores (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Kz-RSI has been successfully translated and validated to identify LPR among the Kazakh-speaking population. Moreover, it is an inexpensive method with strong internal consistency, high retesting rates, reliability, and optimal clinical validity.