Impact of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux in Patients with Voice Disorders.

Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the presence of laryngopharyngeal reflux in patients with voice disorders thereby aiding in the early management and improving the quality of life. Study Design: Cross Sectional study. Methods: This cross sectional study was carried out in a tertiary care hospital, patients with history of voice change for more than 3 weeks were included, and divided into 4 groups depending upon the level of voice use. Patients were asked to fill Koufmann Reflux Symptom Index questionnaire followed by video laryngoscopy and findings were plotted according to Reflux Finding Score. Based on the scoring, impact of LPRD in patient with voice disorders was analysed. Results: Among the 90 study participants, 74 (82.2%) were found to have LPRD. The mean age was 42.76 ± 10.33 years. Majority (43.2%) belong to the age group of 41-50 years, with female predominance (70.3%). Majority (41.9%) of them were level IV voice users. 59.5% were positive Koufman reflex symptom index, 67.6% were positive Reflex finding score. Hoarseness (58.1%) the most common symptom. Conclusion: Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease has to be considered in patients presenting with hoarseness of voice for more than three weeks. Simple and highly reproducible scores like Reflux Symptom Index and Reflux Finding Score proven useful and valuable tools in diagnosing LPRD thereby aiding in early diagnosis and prompt management and improves the patient's quality of life. Level of Evidence: Level 1.

A Study on the Prevalence of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux in Saudi Arabia.

Introduction Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is a condition characterized by the backflow of gastric contents rising through the esophagus, affecting the aerodigestive tract and leading to throat symptoms such as hoarseness, chronic cough, and throat clearing. LPR is recognized as a separate condition from gastroesophageal reflux disease, despite the fact that they both involve the backflow of the stomach contents as their primary pathology. Our study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of LPR within the population of Saudi Arabia. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted using an electronic questionnaire from August to November 2023, involving participants from all five regions of Saudi Arabia. A total of 1140 participants completed the questionnaire, which included the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) to assess the prevalence of LPR. Results LPR was found to be prevalent in 31.2% of the study population, with the most common associated demographics being female gender (p = 0.032) and adults aged 36-45 years (p = 0.006). However, no significant relationship was observed based on region of residence or other demographic factors such as education level or occupation. Conclusion LPR has a high prevalence in the population of Saudi Arabia. Therefore, further research and awareness about this condition are warranted to better understand its impact, improve diagnosis, and develop appropriate management strategies.

Reflux Symptom Index (RSI), Videolaryngostroboscopy and Voice Analysis: A Triad of Non-Invasive Tools to Study Treatment Outcomes of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease (LPRD).

Study post treatment improvement of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease (LPRD) using non-invasive tools of Reflux symptom index (RSI), Reflux finding score (RFS) grading of videolaryngostroboscopy (VLS) and voice analysis. This study from December 2020 to April 2022 enrolled 100 adults with complaints suggestive of reflux symptoms and having Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) more than 13. All patients underwent VLS along with voice analysis. VLS findings were graded using Reflux Finding Score (RFS). Patients were advised for lifestyle modifications and proton pump inhibitors for 8 weeks when post treatment RSI, VLS and voice analyses were again documented. The age range was from 18 to 75 years. Males predominated. Lifestyle modification compliance was seen in 85% of the patients. We found a significant association (P = 0.001) for difference in pretreatment and posttreatment for both Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) parameters & Reflux Finding Score Index (RFS) parameters. Voice analysis pre and post treatment showed a significant association (P = 0.001) for fundamental frequency, jitter, shimmer, harmonic-to-noise ratio and maximum phonation time. The gold standard of diagnosis of LPRD is 24 h pH monitoring but has many false negatives and false positives due to intermittent reflux and inaccurate probe placement. This costly, time consuming and invasive procedure is not widely available amongst our speciality. Excellent visualisation of VLS allowed accurate RFS calculation. Voice analysis permitted early diagnosis of LPRD induced hoarseness before it became clinically significant. It also documented the treatment outcome. We conclude that an 8-weeks proton pump inhibitor treatment combined with lifestyle modification resulted in a significant improvement in the parameters of the non-invasive tools of RSI and RFS and voice analysis.

Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Scoring in a Pediatric Population.

In recent years, the prevalence of laryngopharyngeal reflux has risen, especially among pediatric patients. The diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux relies on patient history and clinical assessment using the Reflux Finding Score and Reflux Symptom Index as crucial diagnostic tools. Some studies have proposed a link between pepsin and laryngopharyngeal reflux, potentially triggering palatine tonsil hypertrophy. Our study aimed to investigate the correlation between laryngeal and pharyngeal manifestations of laryngopharyngeal reflux through two questionnaires and the presence of pepsin in saliva and palatine tonsils in a pediatric population. Pepsin in saliva was detected using a Western blot method, while immunohistochemistry assessed its presence in palatine tonsils. Although no statistically significant differences in Reflux Finding Score and Reflux Symptom Index were found between the immunohistochemistry-positive (IHC-positive) and immunohistochemistry-negative (IHC-negative) groups, median reflux symptom index and Reflux Finding Score values consistently trended higher in the IHC-positive group. This suggests a potential connection between elevated index values and pepsin presence in tonsillar tissue. Further investigations are essential to fully comprehend the clinical implications of these findings.

Outpatient Clinical Markers for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease: A Correlational Study.

Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) is the result of retrograde flow of gastric contents to the laryngopharynx which comes in contact with tissues of the upper aerodigestive tract. Due to ill defined criteria for diagnosis & followup, LPRD patients are underdiagnosed & undertreated. Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) and the Reflux Finding Score (RFS) are two clinical methods which can be utilised especially in the outpatient setup. This study was done with the aim to assess various laryngoscopic findings in patients with LPRD diagnosed symptomatically and examine the correlation between the RSI & RFS by comparing these two indices. This prospective analytical study was conducted at a tertiary care centre in Bangalore in the Department of ENT for a period of 24 months between Dec 2020 to Dec 2022. The study included patients aged 18 to 60 years diagnosed with LPRD based on symptoms as per RSI score (> 13). RSI & RFS were assessed on diagnosis and patients were followed up for 1, 3 & 6 months for assessment. Total 96 patients were enrolled, with mean age of be 42.49 ± 11.33 years. Prevalence was found to be more in females (61.5%). The most common symptom according to RSI was frequent throat clearing & globus sensation (sensation of something sticking in throat) and most common finding according to RFS was erythema/hyperemia. The mean score of RSI and RFI was found to reduce with treatment at different intervals in follow-up visits. There was a significant strength of association between the RSI and RFS at baseline, 1st month, 3rd month and 6th month of follow-up (r = 0.568, r = 0.684, r = 0.774, r = 0.736 respectively) (p < 0.001).The RFS and RSI showed statistically significant strong relationships between total scores and sign and symptom characteristics. On follow-up, there was a significant reduction in the RSI which was also correlated with a reduction in RFS.

Clinical Evaluation of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux and its Response to Proton Pump Inhibitors.

Aim: To clinically evaluate the patients of laryngopharyngeal reflux(LPR) and their response to Proton Pump Inhibitors(PPIs) using laryngeal Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) and Reflux Finding Score (RFS). Method: This prospective observational study was conducted on 128 patients attending the ENT-OPD of VSSIMSAR,Burla,India, who had persistent laryngeal symptoms for more than 2 months.Data was collected using standardized RSI and RFS after taking detailed history and laryngoscopic examination.Patients who were diagnosed of LPR on the basis of their RSI & RFS were subjected to treatment with PPI-Pantoprazole & were called back for follow up at 2nd, 4th and 6th months.Pre and post treatment RSI & RFS were compared using appropriate statistical tests and results with p-value< 0.01 were considered statistically significant. Results: The overall effect of PPIs on all symptoms & signs of LPR,included in RSI and RFS respectively,is statistically significant except on swallowing (not statistically significant at p <0.01) showing a careful usage of RSI & RFS while diagnosing LPR clinically.Study also elucidated that PPI are effective in relieving symptoms of LPR patients.Evaluating Pearson correlation coefficient,the value of R=0.3717;R2 =0.1382 shows low positive correlation between the RSI & RFS.RSI & RFS are related to each other and any change in the RSI will affect the value of RFI and vice versa. Conclusion: From this study we conclude that LPR is prevalent in age of 28-37 years & has female preponderance.PPIs are effective in treating LPR.Though RSI and RFS are effective and valid parameters for managing LPR cases but have to be used cautiously while interpreting the results.

To Determine the Prevalence of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux in Patients of Various Throat Disorders and to Evaluate the Efficacy of Anti-reflux Therapy.

To study the prevalence of Laryngopharyngeal reflux in individuals having throat complaints by applying the Reflux Symptom Index and Reflux finding score as a prognostic tool after anti reflux therapy. Materials and Methods: A Cross-sectional study of 75 patients of age 18 years and above with clinical diagnosis of Laryngopharyngeal reflux was conducted in ENT. Cases were examined with detailed history and thorough examination with indirect laryngoscopy and Hopkins 70 degree endoscope. Symptoms and findings of patients were assessed by Belafsky Reflux Symptom Index and Reflux Finding Score. Patients presenting Belafsky Reflux Symptom Index > 13 and also Reflux Finding Score > 7 were classified as having Laryngopharyngeal reflux. After 6 weeks of treatment, patients were reassessed and Reflux Symptom Index and Reflux finding score were calculated. Results: The mean age of the study subjects was 37.12 ± 12.39 years. Most common symptom reported based on RSI questionnaire was excessive throat mucus (81.33%) followed by clearing of throat (75%) and coughing on lying down and heartburn. Based on the Laryngoscopy, about 57.33% had thick endolarygeal mucus, 56% had diffuse erythema, 45.33% had granulations and 29.33% had subglottic edema. Based on the reflux symptom scores, we found 53.33% and 80% of patients based on reflux findings score to have Laryngopharyngeal Reflux. The mean Reflux Symptom Index scores were 16.25 ± 5.53 and 10.73 ± 4.40 and also the mean Reflux Finding scores were 13.81 ± 2.42 and 6.61 ± 2.16 respectively before and after the treatment which was statistically significant.

Role of Reflux Symptom Index and Reflux Finding Score in Diagnosing Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: A Prospective Study.

Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease (LPRD) is caused due to reflux of gastric content into the larynx and pharynx. The present study was done to assess the role of Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) and Reflux Finding Score (RFS) in the treatment outcomes in symptomatic patients with LPRD. This is a prospective analytical study conducted on 200 patients for a period of 2 years, from January 2020 to February 2022. Patients suspected with LPR were evaluated using RSI and RFS, and both pre and post treatment scores were compared to assess the change in scores of RSI and RFS following 8 weeks of treatment with PPI (Proton pump inhibitor). The patients experienced a greater incidence of moderate symptoms in RSI. Wilcoxon signed-rank test showed significant difference between pre and post treatment scores with respect to reflux symptoms and reflux findings (p < 0.05). Implementation of RSI and RFS scoring system helped for early diagnosis of LPR, and a significant difference was seen between pre and post treatment scores in both RSI and RFS.

[The application progress on diagnostic scales of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease].

At present, objective methods for diagnosing laryngopharyngeal reflux disease(LPRD) are not minimally invasive, effective, and economical. Diagnostic scales are widely used worldwide due to the advantages of inexpensive, noninvasive, and easy to operate. The reflux symptom index(RSI) and the reflux finding score(RFS) are preferred to use in clinical diagnosis. However, many controversies have appeared in the application of RSI and RFS in recent years, causing many troubles to clinical diagnosis. Therefore, this review briefly discusses the problems of RSI and RFS in clinical applications to provide reference for diagnosing LPRD accurately.

Development of a New Self-Assessment Tool for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Screening in Singers (SVHI-12-LPR).

INTRODUCTION: The present study aimed to develop a new tool for the evaluation of singers with self-reported symptoms suggestive of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) (the SVHI-12-LPR), by correlating RSI with SVHI in a population sample of 163 subjects (both professional and amateur singers), evaluated also by videolaryngostroboscopy. This study was a cross-sectional, double-observational study. METHODS: RSI and SVHI were administered to 159 singers (amateurs, singing students, and professional singers). All subjects underwent videolaryngostroboscopy to objectively identify four subgroups: normal subjects (41.5%), subjects with organic lesions occupying the glottic space (17.6%), subjects with functional dysphonia (18.2%), and subjects presenting solely signs suggestive of LPR (22.6%). Using the validated RSI threshold, 33.9% of participants presented an RSI total score >13, suggestive of LPR. RESULTS: Subjects with a suspected diagnosis of LPR at videolaryngostroboscopy presented a mean RSI significantly higher than other subgroups (p < 0.001). Moreover, the SVHI-36 score did not statistically differ between pathological subgroups. A significant positive relationship was observed between RSI and SVHI total score (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient [ρ] = 0.474, p < 0.001). 12 SVHI items (items 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 12, 20, 24, 25, 26, 30) showed a significant association with RSI pathology classification. Statistical analysis demonstrated for the 12 selected items (SVHI-12-LPR) acceptable specificity (0.691) and sensibility (0.833) for the suspected diagnosis of LPR with a cut-off of 15. CONCLUSIONS: From the SVHI-36, 12 items were extracted that correlated with the specific impact that LPR has on the singer's voice (SVHI-12-LPR), as evaluated by RSI and videolaryngostroboscopy. Such questionnaire represents a new tool that could be applied to singers with symptoms suggestive of LPR to select which patients would benefit from a further phoniatric and videolaryngostroboscopic evaluation.

Diagnosing Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: A Comparison between 24-hour pH-Impedance Testing and Pharyngeal Probe (Restech) Testing, with Introduction of the Sataloff Score.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic utility of pH monitoring using 24-hour esophageal pH-Impedance (HEMII-pH) testing versus pharyngeal pH (Restech) testing (Respiratory Technology Corporation, Houston, Texas) for diagnosing laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). METHODS: Retrospectively, patients were reviewed who had completed a Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) survey and stroboscopy within 60 days before or after undergoing simultaneous esophageal pH-Impedance monitoring and Restech testing. Reflux Finding Score (RFS) was determined by 4 blinded observers. 80.45% of patients were on anti-reflux medications at the time of study and had incomplete response to treatment for reflux. Improvement on reflux treatment was determined by evaluating presenting pre-pH monitoring RFS, post treatment RFS, and improvement of symptoms. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to assess relationships among RSI, RFS, and test results from HEMII-pH and Restech tests. RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients were included in the analysis. The inter-rater reliability of the RFS determination was 74.57%, and the intra-rater reliability was 67.00%. Subjects who had a positive RYAN Score had a significant correlation with RFS (r of 0.222 and p-value of 0.0492). There was no correlation between RFS and number or percent time of reflux events, longest event, total number of events, or percent of time at alkaline pH for either HEMII-PH or Restech test. RSI correlated better with HEMII-pH test than with Restech for percent time spent in both upright (r of 0.226 and p-value of 0.029) and supine position (r of 0.261 and a p-value of 0.032). Restech correlated better with total patient symptom Scores including cough, heartburn, burping, and throat clearing, with a r of 0.242 and a p-value of 0.048. Restech detected more percent time in reflux for total reflux, supine reflux, and upright reflux (p-value less than 0.0001). Restech also detected longer event times than Impedance (p-value of less than 0.0001). When diagnosis of LPR is based on the definition of CRC, the Sataloff Score test had 70.45% sensitivity and 80.95% specificity. The RYAN Score had a sensitivity of 72%, and a specificity of 56.45%, and the Wu Score had a sensitivity of 62.16%, and specificity of 54.05%. When the Sataloff and Wu Score were used together, the sensitivity was 71.45%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value of 100%, and a negative predictive value of 59.46%. CONCLUSION: The amount of time of reflux events correlates with symptoms better than the number of events. The HEMII-pH test was able to detect more events of pH<4 than Restech, possibly because there might have been more acid events below than above the upper esophageal sphincter, while Restech detected more total events. Restech recorded longer event times than HEMII-pH test. Since length of time correlates with RFS (probably reflecting laryngeal inflammation), and since laryngeal clearance of acid is more similar to pharyngeal than esophageal clearance, this finding might prove valuable clinically. The Sataloff Score has a sensitivity of 70.45%, and a specificity of 80.95% and appears useful clinically to detect mild to moderate that is missed by the RYAN Score. A combination of Sataloff Score and Wu Score may be clinically valuable to identify LPR with an increased sensitivity of 71.45% and increased specificity of 100%. The Wu Score is not yet available for the general clinical use, but the Sataloff Score is.

The Validity and Reliability of the Reflux Finding Score.

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) disease is common. The incidence of newly diagnosed cases has increased substantially due to awareness and development of new diagnostic measurements. The reflux finding score (RFS) and reflux symptom index (RSI) are believed to be useful in the assessment process, including after the initiation of therapy. However, many authors have suggested concerns about the reliability and validity of the RFS. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity and reliability of the RFS. METHODS: Ninety-two patients diagnosed with LPR who had undergone 24-hour pH-Impedance tests were included. All patients underwent stroboscopy and 24-Hour pH-Impedance monitoring within thirty days. Fifty-nine patients filled out a RSI prior to stroboscopic exam. The RFS was determined by four blinded observers: one otolaryngology resident, two laryngology fellows, and one laryngologist. Stroboscopic images were reviewed again one year later to assess intrarater reliability. RFS and RSI were correlated with 24-hour pH Impedance testing. RESULTS: The Kappa value between reviewers was 0.479. The percent agreement of the four observers for total RFS was 74.04%.The percent agreement between reviewers for subglottic edema was 78.77%; for ventricular obliteration was 65.55%; for erythema/hyperemia was 69.62%, for vocal fold edema was 68.32%; for diffuse laryngeal edema was 66.86%, for posterior commissure hypertrophy was 73.54%; for granuloma/granulation was 96.80%; for thick endolaryngeal mucus was 72.81%. The intrarater reliability of the four observers for total RFS was 67.5% with an intrarater reliability range of 50%-90%. The intrarater reliability for subglottic edema was 85% with a range of 70%-100%; for ventricular obliteration was 77.50% with a range of 70%-90%; for erythema/hyperemia was 65.00% with a range of 50%-90%; for vocal fold edema was 52.50% with a range of 30%-70%; for diffuse laryngeal edema was 62.50% with a range of 20%-80%; for posterior commissure hypertrophy was 52.50% with a range of 10%-80%; for granuloma/granulation was 100%; for thick endolaryngeal mucus was 55.00% with a range of 10%-90%. There was no correlation between RFS and any parameter of the 24-Hr pH-Impedance Test. RSI had a significant correlation with number of upright events (r value of 0.271, R2 of 0.0733 and P-value of 0.037), total symptoms experienced (r value of 0.0.267, R2 of 0.0715 and P-value of 0.041), and symptom correlation score (r value of -0.297, R2 of 0.0884 and P-value of 0.022). CONCLUSION: Many authors have expressed concerns about the reliability and validity of the RFS. In our study we found a fair/substantial interrater reliability, and a modest intra-rater reliability. We found no correlation between the RFS and 24-Hr pH Impedance testing. This study suggests that the concerns about the validity and reliability of the RFS may be warranted. This widely used clinical score should be interpreted with caution and further research and refinement should be considered.

Laryngopharyngeal symptoms and oesophageal disorder: The role of heterotopic gastric mucosa in upper oesophagus.

BACKGROUND: Heterotopic gastric mucosa in the upper oesophagus (HGMUE) was considered as geneogenous manifestation. However, its clinical characteristics may be beyond our knowledge if we focus on its extra-oesophageal presentation. So the aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between HGMUE and laryngopharyngeal symptoms. METHOD: Eight hundred and eleven patients who had gastric endoscopy examination were enrolled in this study and the cervical oesophagus was examined for the patch during withdrawal of the endoscope. Questionnaire for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD-Q) and Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) were completed by all the patients. Pathology feature and therapeutic effect of HGMUE patients were evaluated. RESULT: About 34.53% of the patients undergoing the gastroduodenoscopy had laryngopharyngeal (LP) symptoms. The relevance rate of HGMUE in LP(+) group (10.69%) was higher than that in LP(-) group (2%). The LP symptoms were related to the histological type and expression of H+-K+-ATPase in the histological sample of HGMUE patients. The positive rate of H+-K+-ATPase was 100% in LP(+) group, and that in LP(-) group was 28.6%. PPI therapy was effective for improving the LP symptoms in HGMUE patients. The RSI score in LP(+) patients decreased from 8.12 ± 1.46 at baseline to 4 ± 0.74 at the end of 8 weeks after treatment of PPI. CONCLUSION: HGMUE was an important cause of LP symptoms in patients, especially in those who had no evidence of GERD. The mechanism of HGMUE-induced LP symptoms was due to its location and the function of acid secretion according to the endoscopic finding and histologic characteristics.

Association between secretory otitis media and laryngopharygeal reflux in adults.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between Secretory Otitis Media (SOM) and Laryngopharygeal Reflux (LPR) hasn't been well investigated in adult. PURPOSE: To study the involvement of LPR- in adult SOM. METHODS: We analyzed 60 adult SOM patients who were admitted to Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, China from January 2022 to October 2022. First, we instructed the patients to fill Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) form and Reflux Finding Score (RFS). Second, Dx-ph monitor was used to monitor patients' oropharyngeal PH for 24 h. Finally, we obtained Ryan index based on the characteristics of reflux events in different body postures. In addition, all patients were evaluated by the Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire-7 (ETDQ-7). RESULTS: The positive rate of RSI and/or RFS scale was 73.33% (44/60) in 60 SOM patients. The positive rate of Ryan index was 76.67% (46/60), and the index was the highest in upright position in 60 SOM patients. The positive rate of ETDQ-7 was 100% (46/46) in 46 SOM patients with LPR. CONCLUSION: LPR may be involved in SOM in adults by impairing the function of the eustachian tube.

The application progress on diagnostic scales of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease / 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志

At present, objective methods for diagnosing laryngopharyngeal reflux disease(LPRD) are not minimally invasive, effective, and economical. Diagnostic scales are widely used worldwide due to the advantages of inexpensive, noninvasive, and easy to operate. The reflux symptom index(RSI) and the reflux finding score(RFS) are preferred to use in clinical diagnosis. However, many controversies have appeared in the application of RSI and RFS in recent years, causing many troubles to clinical diagnosis. Therefore, this review briefly discusses the problems of RSI and RFS in clinical applications to provide reference for diagnosing LPRD accurately.

Laryngopharyngeal Reflux in Sleep-Disordered Breathing Patients.

Introduction: Our study aims to evaluate the distribution of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) in patients with sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) via the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) and to describe the sleep architecture in SDB patients with and without LPR. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional, descriptive study was conducted. Patients with SDB were identified via the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and STOP-BANG questionnaire; they were then screened with the RSI and physical examination for LPR. PSG was performed to evaluate obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Results: Of 45 patients, 15 were scored as having LPR via the RSI. Utilizing the Respiratory Disturbance Index (RDI), patients were further classified into four groups: 9 non-LPR with non-OSA SDB, 21 non-LPR with OSA, 4 LPR with non-OSA SDB, and 11 LPR with OSA. The prevalence of LPR was 30.8% in the non-OSA SDB group and 34.4% in the OSA group. All SDB parameters in both groups were similar. SDB patients with high body mass index tended to have LPR and/or OSA. Average ESS scores in the four groups suggested excessive daytime sleepiness, and patients with LPR had higher ESS scores. Regardless of LPR status, SDB patients had a lower percentage of REM sleep and a higher percentage of light sleep. Conclusions: The incidence of LPR in OSA patients was similar in non-OSA SDB patients. REM sleep percentage decreased in the four groups, with the non-OSA SDB group having the lowest percentage of REM sleep; light sleep percentage increased in the four groups, with the OSA group having the highest percentage of light sleep.

The Role of Empirical Treatment with Proton Pump Inhibitor as a Diagnostic Tool in Laryngopharyngeal Reflux.

The presentations of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) are diverse and include chronic hoarseness, sensation of foreign body in the throat, sore throat etc. 24 h pH monitoring considered the gold standard of investigation for LPR is costly, cumbersome and not readily available at all centers. Empirical trial of Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) as a diagnostic tool after assessment by Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) and Reflux Findings Score (RFS) is a cheaper, simple and readily available alternative. The objectives of the study were to determine clinical manifestations in patients presenting with LPR and to evaluate the role of empirical treatment with PPI as a diagnostic tool in LPR. 100 patients were divided into experimental group (RSI ≥ 13 and RFS ≥ 7) and control group (RSI < 13 and RFS < 7). Omeprazole trial was given to experimental group and assessed for RSI and RFS at 04 and 08 weeks. Statistical analysis was done within the group and between the groups. (1) The response rate to Omeprazole at 04 and 08 weeks interval (RSI<13 and/or RFS<7) was 60% and 76% respectively. (2) The response to Omeprazole given to the experimental group with RSI≥13 and RFS≥7 was significant at 04 weeks and 08 weeks duration (P<0.0001). RSI and RFS are good clinical tools to assess and diagnose patients with Laryngopharyngeal reflux. Based on the clinical diagnosis an empirical trial of a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) can be given to patients for duration of 02 months resulting in a good response.

Comparison of Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) with Reflux Finding Score (RFS) and Its Effectiveness in Diagnosis of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease (LPRD).

LPRD is a common condition in patients attending ENT OPDs. Although esophageal manometry and 24 h pH monitoring is considered the gold standard for diagnosis, it is an expensive and time consuming investigation. Newer clinical scales have been developed for diagnosing LPR such as RSI, RFS, Carlsson-Dent, ReQuest, GerdQ, etc. The objective of the study is to compare RSI with RFS and to establish its effectiveness in diagnosing LPRD among OPD patients. It's a descriptive cross-sectional study. ENT outpatients with features of LPRD were asked to fill RSI proforma (score ≥ 13 abnormal), after which they were subjected to indirect laryngoscopy to obtain the RFS (score ≥ 7 diagnostic of LPRD). RSI was compared with RFS. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy of RSI were noted. Of 165 patients, 53.9% were females. Mean RSI scores in males and females were 11.9 and 11.5 and mean RFS scores were 6.4 and 5.7 respectively. RSI had 79.1% sensitivity and 83.7% specificity in diagnosing LPRD with PPV 76.8%, NPV 85.4% and accuracy 81.8% (Chi square value 64.5, p ≤ 0.01). There was substantial agreement between RSI and RFS (Cohen's kappa: 0.625, p ≤ 0.0001). RSI is a simple tool to diagnose LPRD which doesn't mandate invasive procedures such as endoscopy or esophageal manometry. Hence it can be used effectively to diagnose LPRD in ENT outpatients and start the treatment at the earliest.

Laryngopharyngeal Reflux in Obstructive Sleep Apnea-Hypopnea Syndrome: An Updated Meta-Analysis.

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is a common disorder in patients with obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS). This meta-analysis was carried out to evaluate the LPR prevalence in individuals with OSAHS and to analyze the correlation of LPR positivity with the clinical features of patients with OSAHS. A detailed review of the English and Chinese literature on the occurrence of LPR in patients with OSAHS was performed by employing online search tools such as PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, VIP, CNKI, WanFang, etc. Two researchers analyzed the studies for quality according to the STROBE standard checklist. The acquired data were analyzed using Stata 11.0 and R 3.6.1 software. The effect size was estimated and calculated using weighted mean difference (WMD) and correlation coefficients. Moreover, a combined analysis was performed by employing either a random- or fixed-effects model. Ultimately, 27 studies met our inclusion criteria. Our study revealed that the LPR prevalence in OSAHS patients was 49%. We carried out subgroup analyses as per OSAHS severity, ethnicity, and body mass index (BMI). The results suggested that the probability of LPR in European and American patients with OSAHS was higher, and the prevalence of LPR was higher in obese individuals and patients with severe OSAHS. Moreover, apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and BMI were higher in LPR-positive OSAHS patients than in LPR-negative OSAHS patients, but no significant variation in age was observed in the two groups. Moreover, the reflux symptom index (RSI) scores and the reflux finding score (RFS) exhibited a positive correlation with AHI. The current literature shows a higher incidence of LPR in individuals with OSAHS (49%). The severity of AHI in individuals with OSAHS is associated with the presence of LPR. Patients with OSAHS accompanied by LPR showed higher BMI and AHI as compared to those patients with LPR-negative OSAHS.

Laryngopharyngeal reflux as a potential cause of Eustachian tube dysfunction in patients with otitis media with effusion.

Objective: To explore the association between laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD)-related symptoms and the Eustachian tube (ET) function in adult patients with otitis media with effusion (OME). Materials and methods: A total of 105 adult patients with OME were retrospectively studied. All these patients had undergone tubomanometry (TMM) test for the affected ears before treatments. The LPRD-related symptoms were all assessed by the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) scale. Results: Among the 105 included patients, the numbers of subjects with only one and both two ears affected were 65 (57.1%) and 40 (42.9%), respectively. Therefore, a total of 145 affected ears were studied. For these affected ears, a linear regression analysis that included sex, age, BMI, smoking history, drinking history, RSI value, and the condition of the contralateral ear suggested that only RSI value was significantly associated with TMM value (P < 0.001), with the correlation coefficient of -0.112. Among the 9 symptoms in RSI scale, affected ears with the following symptoms (vs. affected ears without) showed significantly lower TMM values: excess throat mucus or postnasal drip, difficulty swallowing food, liquids, or pills, and sensations of something stuck in your throat or a lump in your throat (all P < 0.05). Conclusion: LPRD may disrupt ET function in adult OME patients. A higher RSI score is independently predictive for a bad ET patency in such patients and is indicative for an additional anti-reflux therapy.