Effective re-induction regimen for children with recurrent medulloblastoma.

Background: There is no standard treatment for the recurrence of medulloblastoma, the most common malignant childhood brain tumor, and prognosis remains dismal. In this study, we introduce a regimen that is well-tolerated and effective at inducing remission. Methods: The primary objectives of this study were to assess tolerability of the regimen and overall response rate (ORR). A retrospective chart review of patients with recurrent medulloblastoma, treated at two institutions with a re-induction regimen of intravenous irinotecan and cyclophosphamide with oral temozolomide and etoposide, was performed. Demographic, clinicopathologic, toxicity, and response data were collected and analyzed. Results: Nine patients were identified. Median age was 5.75 years. Therapy was well-tolerated with no therapy-limiting toxicities and no toxic deaths. Successful stem cell collection was achieved in all 5 patients in whom it was attempted. ORR after 2 cycles was 78%. Three patients had a complete response, 4 patients had a partial response, 1 patient had stable disease, and 1 patient had progressive disease. Four patients are alive with no evidence of disease (NED), 2 patients are alive with disease, 2 patients have died of disease, and 1 patient died of toxicity related to additional therapy (NED at time of death). Conclusions: This regimen is well-tolerated and effective. Tumor response was noted in the majority of cases, allowing patients to proceed to additional treatment with no or minimal disease. Further study of this regimen in a clinical trial setting is an important next step.

Predictors of radioiodine (RAI)-avidity restoration for NTRK fusion-positive RAI-resistant metastatic thyroid cancers.

Context: Two-thirds of metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) patients have radioiodine (RAI)-resistant disease, resulting in poor prognosis and high mortality. For rare NTRK and RET fusion-positive metastatic, RAI-resistant thyroid cancers, variable success of re-induction of RAI avidity during treatment with NTRK or RET inhibitors has been reported. Case presentation and results: We report two cases with RAI-resistant lung metastases treated with larotrectinib: an 83-year-old male presenting with an ETV6::NTRK3 fusion-positive tumor with the TERT promoter mutation c.-124C>T, and a 31-year-old female presenting with a TPR::NTRK1 fusion-positive tumor (and negative for TERT promoter mutation). Post larotrectinib treatment, diagnostic I-123 whole body scan revealed unsuccessful RAI-uptake re-induction in the TERT-positive tumor, with a thyroid differentiation score (TDS) of -0.287. In contrast, the TERT-negative tumor exhibited successful I-131 reuptake with a TDS of -0.060. Conclusion: As observed for RAI-resistance associated with concurrent TERT and BRAF mutations, the co-occurrence of TERT mutations and NTRK fusions may also contribute to re-sensitization failure.

Single or continuous multiple intravenous re-induction in Crohn's disease patients who lost response to ustekinumab: Evidence from real-world data.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Re-induction optimization of ustekinumab is effective in Crohn's disease (CD) patients who experienced a loss of response (LOR) to ustekinumab. However, whether continuous multiple intravenous optimization is better than single dose re-induction remains unknown. We aimed to compare effectiveness of two strategies in CD patients with LOR to ustekinumab. METHODS: We retrospectively included CD patients who had LOR to standardized ustekinumab therapy. They were divided into three groups according to different times (one to three) for re-induction. RESULTS: This study included 50, 26 and 22 of 98 eligible patients in one intravenous re-induction subgroup, double intravenous re-induction subgroup and three intravenous re-induction subgroup, respectively. At week 24, 67.3%, 75.5%, 56.6%, 69.8% and 61.2% of all achieved steriod free clinical remission, clinical response, endoscopic remission, endoscopic response and C-reactive protein normalization, respectively. No differences were found in all endpoints between three groups. Ustekinumab trough level at week 24 but not times of re-induction showed a tendency to predict clinical remission. No serious adverse events were found in this cohort. CONCLUSION: Intravenous re-induction was safe and effective in CD patients who experienced LOR to ustekinumab. Trough level of ustekinumab but not times of intravenous re-induction may associated with clinical efficacy.

Rituximab as add-on therapy in patients with resistant lupus nephritis who have failed induction or maintenance therapy with other agents: A real-world experience from a single center in Mumbai.

BACKGROUND: Lupus nephritis (LN) is associated with poor outcomes and a significant risk of progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Some patients with resistant LN do not respond adequately to current treatment options and need alternative strategies or therapies. OBJECTIVE: The objective is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab as a re-induction therapy (Re-RTX) followed by maintenance therapy for patients with resistant LN. METHODS: Twenty-four patients with resistant LN (failed initial induction therapy or severe relapse after remission) were analyzed. Re-RTX was co-administered with other immunosuppressants. The primary KDIGO criteria outcomes included renal response (complete and partial), disease progression, relapses, and infections. RESULTS: The median age was 28 years (IQR 24.5-42), and the female-to-male ratio was 11:1. All patients had active LN, and 91.3% had proliferative LN. Baseline creatinine was 1.075 mg% (IQR 0.7-1.38), and mean urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR) was 4.9 (IQR 2.8-6.65). Of the patients receiving RTX as re-induction therapy, 66.6% (16/24) had failed initial induction therapy with other immunosuppressants, whereas 33.3% (8/24) had severe relapse during maintenance therapy.Re-RTX had a favorable renal response at 6 months, with 91.7% of the patients responding (20.8% complete response and 70.8% partial response). At 12 months, 58.3% of the patients maintained a renal response (25% complete response and 33.3% partial response). Approximately one-third of patients relapsed within a year.Fourteen patients (58.3%) continued RTX maintenance therapy with two different treatment regimens. At 6 months, Regimen-1 (500 mg every 6 months) resulted in a partial response in 43% (3/7) and relapse in 57% (4/7) of patients. Regimen 2 (1 g dose per year) achieved a complete response in 28.5% (2/7) and a partial response in 71.5% (5/7) with no relapses at 6 months.At a median follow-up of 29 months, adverse renal outcomes were observed in 29.16% of the patients with progression to advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) or end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The overall use of Re-RTX was considered safe, with a reported infection prevalence of 16%, which is comparable to the existing data. CONCLUSION: Re-RTX demonstrated efficacy and safety as an induction therapy for resistant LN. However, the response waned after 1 year, underscoring the need for optimized maintenance therapy.

ffectiveness and safety of ustekinumab dose escalation in Crohn’s disease: a multicenter observational study / Efectividad y seguridad del aumento de dosis de ustekinumab en la enfermedad de Crohn: un estudio observacional multicéntrico

Background: ustekinumab has proven effective in Crohn’s disease (CD). However, some patients will partially respond or lose response over time. Data supporting the effectiveness of dose escalation in this scenario is scarce. Aim: to evaluate the effectiveness of ustekinumab dose escalation in CD. Methods: patients with active CD (Harvey-Bradshaw ≥ 5) who had received intravenous (IV) induction and at least a subcutaneous (SC) dose were included in this retrospective observational study. Ustekinumab dose was escalated, either via shortening of the interval to six or four weeks or IV reinduction plus shortening to every four weeks. Results: ninety-one patients were included, and ustekinumab dose was escalated after a median of 35 weeks of treatment. At week 16 after intensification, steroid-free clinical response and remission were observed in 62.6 % and 25.3 % of patients, respectively. Systemic corticosteroids were discontinued in 46.7 % of patients who were on corticosteroids at baseline. Follow-up data beyond week 16 were available for 78 % of patients; at the last visit, 66.2 % and 43.7 % were in steroid-free clinical response and remission, respectively. After a median follow-up of 64 weeks, 81 % of patients were still treated with ustekinumab. Adverse events were reported in 4.3 % of patients; these were all mild and did not lead to hospitalization or discontinuation of treatment. Five patients (5.5 %) underwent surgical resection, with no immediate postsurgical complications. Conclusion: ustekinumab dose escalation was effective in recapturing response in over half of the patients. These findings suggest that dose escalation should be considered in patients who experience loss or partial response to the standard maintenance.(AU)

Rituximab induction and reinduction in granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis: A retrospective multicenter study in Taiwan.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) and microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) under rituximab induction and reinduction therapy in Taiwan. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study in patients with GPA or MPA receiving rituximab therapy from August 2008 to July 2020 in seven medical centers in Taiwan. The clinical characteristics and outcomes of these patients were analyzed. RESULTS: In total, 53 patients (18 with GPA and 35 with MPA) were included. Kidney involvement (82.9% vs. 22.2%, p < .001) and initial creatinine (3.25 ± 2.37 vs. 1.07 ± 0.82, p < .001) were significantly higher in MPA. Within 24 weeks after the first course of rituximab, there were seven deaths (five due to infection and two due to active disease) in patients with MPA (7/35, 20%) compared to 0 in patients with GPA. Of 33 patients receiving rituximab for kidney involvement, 23 survived and were free from renal replacement therapy at 24 weeks. Their chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages improved in 2 but progressed in 7, while 24 had stable CKD stages. Death or end-stage renal disease (ESRD) was associated with infection and higher initial creatinine. Reinduction therapy for relapse was required in 18 (39.1%) of 46 survivors, which was associated with anti-proteinase 3 (PR3) positive (odds ratio 3.667, p = .049) and younger age with a cutoff of 49.4 (AUC = 0.679, p = .030, sensitivity = 66.67%, specificity = 75%). CONCLUSION: Significant mortality occurred after rituximab induction, especially in patients with MPA. In survivors, age younger than 50 and anti-PR3 positive were associated with the risk of relapse requiring reinduction.

Extra intravenous Ustekinumab reinduction is an effective optimization strategy for patients with refractory Crohn's disease.

Objectives: Ustekinumab (UST) optimization strategies, including shortening intervals and intravenous reinduction, should be administered to patients with partial or loss of respond. Evidence comparing these types of optimization treatments is limited. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of weight-based UST intravenous reinduction in patients with refractory Crohn's disease (CD). Methods: This was a single-center retrospective observational study. Optimization strategies were designed for patients showing partial or loss of response to standardized UST therapy. Clinical, biochemical, and endoscopic response and remission rate were determined by Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI), C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, and SES-CD evaluation. UST trough concentrations were detected and adverse events were recorded. Results: A total of 128 patients receiving UST optimization therapies were included, with 105 patients administered shortening intervals of q8w or q4w, and 23 receiving intravenous reinduction followed by subcutaneous q8w or q4w. The follow-up duration for the shortening interval and reinduction cohorts were 15.0 (10.0, 31.0) and 23.0 (13.0, 70.0) weeks, respectively. A significant CDAI delta variation pre-and post-treatment could be found between groups [17.0 (-4.4, 65.9) vs. 69.0(10.7, 151.0), p = 0.013]. the trough concentration of UST increased [2.5 (1.3, 5.3) vs. 1.1 (0.5, 2.3), p = 0.001] after intravenous reinduction. Clinical and endoscopic remission were achieved in 69.6 and 31.8% of patients in the intravenous reinduction cohort, and 62.9 and 22.2% of patients in the shortening interval cohort, respectively. No significant difference was found between groups regarding safety. Conclusion: Intravenous reinduction brought about favorable recapture of clinical and endoscopic remission, and should have significant priority over the strategy of merely shortening drug intervals, which should be launched before switching to other biologics targeting different inflammatory pathways.Clinical Trial Registration: identifier NCT04923100. https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04923100?id=04923100&draw=2&rank=1.

Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor (ICI) Rechallenge in Advanced Melanoma Patients' Responders to a First Course of ICI: A Multicenter National Retrospective Study of the French Group of Skin Cancers (Groupe de Cancérologie Cutanée, GCC).

BACKGROUND: The long-term effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) rechallenge for progressive or recurrent advanced melanoma following previous disease control induced by ICI has not been thoroughly described in the literature. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective multicenter national real-life study, we enrolled patients who had been rechallenged with an ICI after achieving disease control with a first course of ICI, which was subsequently interrupted. The primary objective was to evaluate tumor response, while the secondary objectives included assessing the safety profile, identifying factors associated with tumor response, and evaluating survival outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 85 patients from 12 centers were included in the study. These patients had advanced (unresectable stage III or stage IV) melanoma that had been previously treated and controlled with a first course of ICI before undergoing rechallenge with ICI. The rechallenge treatments consisted of pembrolizumab (n = 44, 52%), nivolumab (n = 35, 41%), ipilimumab (n = 2, 2%), or ipilimumab plus nivolumab (n = 4, 5%). The best overall response rate was 54%. The best response was a complete response in 30 patients (35%), a partial response in 16 patients (19%), stable disease in 18 patients (21%) and progressive disease in 21 patients (25%). Twenty-eight adverse events (AEs) were reported in 23 patients (27%), including 18 grade 1-2 AEs in 14 patients (16%) and 10 grade 3-4 AEs in nine patients (11%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 21 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was not reached at the time of analysis. Patients who received another systemic treatment (chemotherapy, targeted therapy or clinical trial) between the two courses of ICI had a lower response to rechallenge (p = 0.035) and shorter PFS (p = 0.016). CONCLUSION: Rechallenging advanced melanoma patients with ICI after previous disease control induced by these inhibitors resulted in high response rates (54%) and disease control (75%). Therefore, ICI rechallenge should be considered as a relevant therapeutic option.

Efficacy and toxicity of CLAG combined with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in the treatment of refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia.

BACKGROUND: Refractory and relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (r/rAML) is associated with a difficult prognosis; clinical trials are typically suggested despite lack of a recognized standard of care. Combinatorial chemotherapy regimens utilized for r/rAML salvage play a crucial role in battling this invasive phase. Although it is characterized by a low response rate, CLAG is a traditional regimen used in r/rAML. We aimed to compare the efficacy and toxicity of CLAG+PLD to explore whether there was any improvement with the addition of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) to CLAG METHODS: A total of 110 r/rAML patients were retrospectively analyzed from February 2017 to June 2020 at the Medical Center of Hematology, XinQiao Hospital, the 303rd Hospital of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, and Central Hospital of Chang Sha, Hunan Province. The response, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and side effects in 110 r/rAML patients were evaluated retrospectively. Of these, 55 patients were administered CLAG+PLD, while 55 patients received CLAG alone as salvage therapy. RESULTS: In the CLAG+PLD group, there were 27 (49.1%) cases of complete response (CR) with no measurable residual disease (MRD-), 12 (21.8%) cases of CR with positive MRD (MRD+), 5 (9.1%) cases of partial response (PR), 11 (20%) cases of no response (NR), and no cases of death during the cycles. The response rates in the CLAG group were lower: CR was reached in 24 (46.6%) patients with MRD-, 6 (10.9%) patients with MRD+, 10 (18.2%) patients with PR, 13 (23.6%) patients with NR, and 2 (3.6%) patients who passed away, one from infection and the other from cerebral hemorrhage. The median OS and DFS were not attained in the CLAG+PLD group during the 2-year OS and DFS follow-up, while both values were 10 months in the CLAG group (p = 0.023 and p = 0.045, respectively). The results of the Cox regression analysis for the CLAG+PLD group were strongly illustrative of the importance of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) following salvage therapy. No increased toxicity was observed in the CLAG+PLD group. CONCLUSION: CLAG+PLD is a potential salvage regimen for r/r AML that has a similar toxicity profile to CLAG and that improves response rates, 2-year OS, and DFS relative to CLAG.

Vaccines prevent reinduction of rheumatoid arthritis symptoms in collagen-induced arthritis mouse model.

Metabolic reprogramming of immune cells modulates their function and reduces the severity of autoimmune diseases. However, the long-term effects of the metabolically reprogrammed cells, specifically in the case of immune flare-ups, need to be examined. Herein, a re-induction rheumatoid arthritis (RA) mouse model was developed by injecting T-cells from RA mice into drug-treated mice to recapitulate the effects of T-cell-mediated inflammation and mimic immune flare-ups. Immune metabolic modulator paKG(PFK15 + bc2) microparticles (MPs) were shown to reduce clinical symptoms of RA in collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) mice. Upon re-induction, a significant delay in the reappearance of clinical symptoms in the paKG(PFK15 + bc2) microparticle treatment group was observed as compared to equal or higher doses of the clinically utilized U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drug, Methotrexate (MTX). Furthermore, paKG(PFK15 + bc2) microparticle-treated mice were able to lower activated dendritic cells (DCs) and inflammatory T helper cell 1 (TH1) and increased activated, proliferating regulatory T-cells (Tregs) more effectively than MTX. The paKG(PFK15 + bc2) microparticles also led to a significant reduction in paw inflammation in mice as compared to MTX treatment. This study can pave the way for the development of flare-up mouse models and antigen-specific drug treatments.

Re-induction therapy in patients with acute myeloid leukemia not in complete remission after the first course of treatment.

A standard salvage regimen for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are not in complete remission (CR) after initial induction therapy does not exist. We retrospectively investigated re-induction therapy for 151 patients with AML who did not achieve CR after the initial course between January 2014 and March 2021. The re-induction regimen did not correlate with the CR rate after the second course, whereas patients had similar 5-year overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) based on different re-induction regimens. Multivariable analysis revealed that International European Leukaemia Net (ELN) risk stratification independently predicted both OS and EFS among patients not in CR after the first course, although the re-induction regimen did not predict prognosis. Urgent salvage alloHSCT may improve the prognosis of patients with refractory AML. In summary, our study showed that the re-induction regimen did not significantly predict the prognosis of patients with AML not in CR after the first course of treatment. The development and selection of an efficient treatment algorithm for the treatment of AML remains a pressing research challenge.

Reinduction of Hedgehog Inhibitors after Checkpoint Inhibition in Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma: A Series of 12 Patients.

For patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma (aBCC) first-line treatment with hedgehog inhibitors (HHIs) and second-line treatment with PD1 inhibitors (PD1i) is available, offering combination and sequencing options. Here, we focus on the efficacy and safety of HHI reinduction after PD1i failure. Retrospective data analysis was performed with 12 patients with aBCC (locally advanced (n = 8)/metastatic (n = 4)). These patients (male:female 6:6, median age 68 years) initially received HHIs, leading to complete/partial response (66%) or stable disease (33%). Median treatment duration was 20.8 (2-64.5) months until discontinuation due to progression (n = 8), adverse events (n = 3), or patient request (n = 1). Subsequent PD1 inhibition (pembrolizumab 42%, cemiplimab 58%) yielded a partial response (8%), stable disease (33%), or progression (59%). Median treatment duration was 4.1 (0.8-16.3) months until discontinuation due to progression (n = 9), adverse events (n = 1), patient request (n = 1), or missing drug approval (n = 1). HHI reinduction resulted in complete/partial response (33%), stable disease (50%), or progression (17%). Median treatment duration was 3.6 (1-29) months. Response duration in the four responding patients was 2-29+ months. Thus, a subgroup of patients with aBCC responded to reinduction of HHI following PD1i failure. Therefore, this sequential treatment represents a feasible treatment option.

Efficacy of Intravenous Ustekinumab Reinduction in Patients With Crohn's Disease With a Loss of Response.

Background/Aims: In patients receiving ustekinumab (UST) for treatment of Crohn's disease, there is no proven strategy to enhance or re-capture response. We assessed the utility of UST intravenous (IV) reinduction (~6 mg/kg) to achieve clinical, biochemical and endoscopic response or remission, in patients with partial or loss of response to UST maintenance therapy. Methods: A multicentre, retrospective cohort study was performed. Adults who received an IV reinduction dose of UST for either partial response or secondary loss of response to UST were assessed. The primary outcome was clinical remission off corticosteroids (Harvey Bradshaw Index <5), with biochemical response (defined as ≥ 50% decrease of CRP or FCP and/or endoscopic response (defined as a decrease in Simple Endoscopic Score-CD ≥ 50%). Secondary outcomes included clinical, biomarker and endoscopic response/remission, as well as safety. Results: Sixty-five patients (median age 38 years, 54.7% women) underwent IV UST reinduction between January 2017 and April 2019. Most patients (88.3%) were already on escalated maintenance dosing of UST 90 mg subcutaneous every 4 weeks. Clinical outcomes were assessed at a median of 14 weeks (IQR: 12-19) post-reinduction. The primary outcome of clinical remission off corticosteroids with biochemical and/or endoscopic response was achieved in 31.0% (n = 18). Pre-reinduction UST concentrations were ≥1 µg/mL in 88.6% (mean 3.2 ± 2.0 µg/mL). No serious adverse events were reported. Conclusions: UST IV reinduction can be effective in patients with Crohn's disease with partial or loss of response to UST maintenance therapy. Further studies evaluating this strategy are warranted.

Reinduction of an Anti-EGFR-based First-line Regimen in Patients with RAS Wild-type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Enrolled in the Valentino Study.

BACKGROUND: In patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), growing evidence supports anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) retreatment, whereas little is known on the outcomes of anti-EGFR-based reinduction therapy during the upfront strategy. METHODS: We included patients enrolled in the Valentino study who had disease progression and received at least one dose of post-progression therapy. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression were used for the survival analysis. When comparing the outcomes of anti-EGFR-based reinduction versus any second line, a propensity score-based matching was used. RESULTS: Liver-limited/single site of disease (P < .001 and P = .002), left-sidedness (P = .029), surgery of metastases (P = .003), early tumor shrinkage, and deeper responses (P = .018 and P = .036) were associated with the use of anti-EGFR-based reinduction versus any other second line. All patients treated with reinduction had an anti-EGFR-free interval of at least 3 months. In the propensity score-matched population, progression-free survival (PFS) was similar in the 2 treatment groups, the overall survival (OS) was significantly longer for patients treated with reinduction (P = .029), and the response rate was higher in patients treated with reinduction (P = .033). An oxaliplatin-free interval ≥12 months, left-sidedness, and molecular hyperselection beyond RAS/BRAF were associated with significantly better outcomes after anti-EGFR-based reinduction. CONCLUSIONS: Reinduction strategies with anti-EGFR-based regimens are commonly used in clinical practice. Our data highlight the importance of clinical-molecular selection for re-treatments and the need for prospective strategy trials in selected populations.

Multicenter comparison of first salvage chemotherapy versus novel therapy regimens in adult relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) represent a heterogeneous population and therefore there is no standard of care first salvage regimen. We conducted a multicenter, retrospective analysis to compare chemotherapy (e.g. HyperCVAD, MOAD, Larson/CALGB-9511, etc.) to novel agents (blinatumomab or inotuzumab) in first salvage. The primary endpoint, overall survival (OS), was not significantly different among treatment arms, with a median OS of 10.6 months with chemotherapy and 10.1 months with novel therapy (p = .799). Similarly, there was no difference in the CR/CRi rate, with a CR/CRi in 18 patients (41.9%) versus 16 patients (47.1%) treated with salvage chemotherapy and novel therapy, respectively (p = .817). Age significantly impacted the probability of achieving CR/CRi with novel therapy versus chemotherapy. This analysis suggests the use of chemotherapy in first salvage still represents an appropriate treatment option, particularly for young fit patients, as the median OS was roughly 10 months regardless of whether patients received novel therapy or chemotherapy in first salvage. For the reported outcomes, 100% of patients in the novel therapy arm received a novel therapy (per design), whereas only 60.5% of patients in the chemotherapy arm required a novel therapy. Thus, 40% of patients did not require a novel therapy for similar OS. This analysis demonstrates that first-line chemotherapy can achieve similar results to novel therapies, especially now that novel therapies are available for subsequent relapses. However, this study has several limitations including younger age, increased CNS involvement, and higher blast percentage in the chemotherapy arm and potential confounders, including selection of treatment sequence as 43 patients (55.8%) ultimately received both chemotherapy and novel therapy. Therefore, a larger, prospective, randomized study with adequate chemotherapy comparators and availability of novel agents upon relapse is warranted to confirm these results.

Immune Checkpoint Blockade for Metastatic Uveal Melanoma: Re-Induction following Resistance or Toxicity.

Re-induction with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) needs to be considered in many patients with uveal melanoma (UM) due to limited systemic treatment options. Here, we provide hitherto the first analysis of ICB re-induction in UM. A total of 177 patients with metastatic UM treated with ICB were included from German skin cancer centers and the German national skin cancer registry (ADOReg). To investigate the impact of ICB re-induction, two cohorts were compared: patients who received at least one ICB re-induction (cohort A, n = 52) versus those who received only one treatment line of ICB (cohort B, n = 125). In cohort A, a transient benefit of overall survival (OS) was observed at 6 and 12 months after the treatment start of ICB. There was no significant difference in OS between both groups (p = 0.1) with a median OS of 16.2 months (cohort A, 95% CI: 11.1-23.8) versus 9.4 months (cohort B, 95% CI: 6.1-14.9). Patients receiving re-induction of ICB (cohort A) had similar response rates compared to those receiving ICB once. Re-induction of ICB may yield a clinical benefit for a small subgroup of patients even after resistance or development of toxicities.

Restoring Immune Mediated Disease Control by Ipilimumab Re-exposition in a Heavily pretreated Patient With MSI-H mCRC.

BACKGROUND: Immune-Checkpoint-inhibitors (ICIs) are approved in first line therapy of microsatellite-instable, deficient miss-match-repair (MSI-H-dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), and in second line after standard chemotherapy. Evidence supporting immunotherapy after immunotherapy is scarce. CASE REPORT: This case report highlights the course of a heavily pretreated patient with MSI-H mCRC with progression after multiple local therapies, standard chemotherapies and pembrolizumab. After 4 cycles of ipilimumab and nivolumab followed by nivolumab-maintenance he achieved a long-lasting disease control of 22 months. After further subsequent progression he regained immune mediated disease control by a second "boost" of ipilimumab. CONCLUSION: Re-exposition with ipilimumab is a potential option to restore immune-mediated-disease-control in patients with preceding long-lasting response to ipilimumab/nivolumab and with dMMR-tumors. The clinical situation of progress after long-lasting disease control on ICIs becomes more common and is an opportunity to investigate potential strategies for restoring immune mediated disease control.

Re-induction With Intravenous Ustekinumab in Patients With Crohn's Disease and a Loss of Response to This Therapy.

BACKGROUND: A significant percentage of patients treated with ustekinumab may lose response. Our aim was to evaluate the short-term efficacy and safety of intravenous re-induction with ustekinumab in patients with Crohn's disease who have lost the response to the treatment. METHODS: This is a retrospective, observational, multicenter study. Treatment efficacy was measured at week 8 and 16; clinical remission was defined when the Harvey-Bradshaw Index was ≤4 points, and clinical response was defined as a decrease of ≥3 points in the index compared with the baseline. Adverse events and treatment decisions after re-induction were also collected. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients from 13 centers were included. Forty-nine percent had previously failed to respond to 2 biological treatments, and 24.5% had failed to respond to 3. The average exposure time to ustekinumab before re-induction was 17.7 ± 12.8 months. In 56.6% of patients, the administration interval had been shortened to every 4 to 6 weeks before re-induction. At week 8 and 16 after re-induction, 49.0% (n = 26) and 43.3% (n = 23), respectively, were in remission, whereas 64.1% (n = 34) and 52.8% (n = 28) had a clinical response. Patients who achieved remission at week 16 had lower C-reactive protein levels than those who did not respond (2.8 ± 1.6 vs 12.5 ± 9.5 mg/dL; P = 0.001). No serious adverse events related to re-induction were observed. CONCLUSION: Intravenous re-induction with ustekinumab is an effective and safe strategy that recovers the response in approximately half of the patients with refractory Crohn's disease who experience a loss of response. Re-induction can be attempted before switching out of the therapy class.

Reinduction therapy with everolimus in combination with dexamethasone, high-dose cytarabin and cisplatinum in patients with relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma: an experimental phase I/II multicentre trial of the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG HD-R3i).

Reinduction chemotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant (HDCT + ASCT) is second-line standard of care for transplant-eligible patients with relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (r/r cHL) but has a high failure rate. Because response to reinduction is predictive of the outcome after HDCT + ASCT, we aimed to improve the standard dexamethasone, high-dose cytarabine and cisplatinum (DHAP) reinduction regimen by addition of the oral mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus (everDHAP). Transplant-eligible patients aged 18-60 years with histologically confirmed r/r cHL were included in this experimental phase I/II trial. Everolimus (10 mg/day, determined in phase-I-part) was administered on day 0-13 of each DHAP cycle. From July 2014 to March 2018, 50 patients were recruited to the phase II everDHAP group; two were not evaluable, three discontinued due to toxicity. Randomization to a placebo group stopped in October 2015 due to poor recruitment after nine patients. The primary end-point of computed tomography (CT)-based complete remission (CR) after two cycles of everDHAP was expected to be ≥40%. With a CT-based CR rate of 27% (n = 12/45) after two cycles of everDHAP the trial did not meet the primary end-point. Adding everolimus to DHAP is thus feasible; however, the everDHAP regimen failed to show an improved efficacy.