Renal denervation: a key approach to hypertension and cardiovascular disease.

Sympathetic activation plays a critical role in the development of hypertension and cardiovascular disease, including heart failure and arrhythmias. Renal nerves contribute to the regulation of blood pressure and fluid volume through renal sympathetic efferent nerves, and to the modulation of sympathetic outflow through renal sensory afferent nerves. Previous studies including ours suggest that selective afferent renal denervation with preservation of efferent renal nerves can significantly decrease central sympathetic outflow in animal models of hypertension with renal damage. In Dahl salt-sensitive rats fed high salt diet from an early age, a model of hypertensive heart failure, this central sympathoinhibition by afferent renal denervation may attenuate the development of heart failure without significant blood pressure reduction. Accumulating clinical evidence supports the efficacy of renal denervation as an antihypertensive treatment. However, it remains important to clarify the appropriate indications and predictors of responders to renal denervation in the treatment of hypertension. Several clinical studies suggest beneficial effects of renal denervation in patients with heart disease, with or without hypertension, although most were not sham-controlled. In particular, some clinical studies have demonstrated that renal denervation reduces the incidence of atrial fibrillation or cardiovascular events even without a significant antihypertensive effect. It is essential to accumulate more insightful data in patients undergoing renal denervation, to establish the efficacy of renal denervation in patients with cardiovascular disease in the clinical setting, and to elucidate the therapeutic mechanisms of renal denervation and the renal nerves-linked pathophysiology of cardiovascular disease in basic research. This review outlines the effects of renal denervation on sympathetic activity and organ damage in animal models of hypertension and hypertensive heart failure, including our own data. Beyond the antihypertensive effects, the beneficial effects of renal denervation on cardiovascular disease are also discussed based on clinical studies. Several animal and clinical studies suggest the cardioprotective effects of renal denervation even in the absence of significant blood pressure reduction, probably due to its sympathoinhibitory effects.

Patient-Specific Factors Predicting Renal Denervation Response in Patients With Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The accurate selection of patients likely to respond to renal denervation (RDN) is crucial for optimizing treatment outcomes in patients with hypertension. This systematic review was designed to evaluate patient-specific factors predicting the RDN response. METHODS AND RESULTS: We focused on individuals with hypertension who underwent RDN. Patients were categorized based on their baseline characteristics. The primary outcome was blood pressure (BP) reduction after RDN. Both randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized studies were included. We assessed the risk of bias using corresponding tools and further employed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach to assess the overall quality of evidence. A total of 50 studies were ultimately included in this systematic review, among which 17 studies were for meta-analysis. Higher baseline heart rate and lower pulse wave velocity were shown to be associated with significant antihypertensive efficacy of RDN on 24-hour systolic BP reduction (weighted mean difference, -4.05 [95% CI, -7.33 to -0.77]; weighted mean difference, -7.20 [95% CI, -9.79 to -4.62], respectively). In addition, based on qualitative analysis, higher baseline BP, orthostatic hypertension, impaired baroreflex sensitivity, and several biomarkers are also reported to be associated with significant BP reduction after RDN. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with hypertension treated with the RDN, higher heart rate, and lower pulse wave velocity were associated with significant BP reduction after RDN. Other factors, including higher baseline BP, hypertensive patients with orthostatic hypertension, BP variability, impaired cardiac baroreflex sensitivity, and some biomarkers are also reported to be associated with a better BP response to RDN.

Investigations of Laser-Assisted Renal Denervation for Treatment of Resistant Hypertension.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Renal denervation (RDN) is an emerging surgical treatment for resistant hypertension. However, the current RDN using radiofrequency can cause undesirable thermal damage to the medial and luminal layers due to direct contact between the arterial lumen and energy source. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of the new laser-assisted RDN by exploring the potential treatment conditions. METHODS: For ex vivo testing, six different treatment conditions (10 and 20 W applied for delivery of 300, 450, and 600 J) were tested on the porcine liver and renal artery (RA) by using a continuous wave 1064 nm laser wavelength. The ablated area in the liver tissue was measured to estimate the extent of the coagulated area. Histological evaluation was performed on the treated RA tissues to confirm the extent of thermal nerve damage. RESULTS: The ablated depth, length, and area in the liver tissue increased with laser power and total energy. According to the histological results, 20 W groups yielded more significant damage to the RA nerves than 10 W groups at the total energy of 300 J (0.0 ± 0.0 mm for 10 W vs. 2.9 ± 1.0 mm for 20 W), 450 J (1.9 ± 0.6 mm for 10 W vs. 6.8 ± 1.5 mm for 20 W), and 600 J (2.9 ± 0.4 mm for 10 W vs. 7.3 ± 0.8 mm for 20 W). The treated RA exhibited insignificant medial injury in depth (medial thinning ≤ 25%), and no difference in the medial thinning was found among the six groups (p = 0.4). CONCLUSION: The current study demonstrated that the 1064 nm laser at 20 W with delivery of 450 J could effectively damage the RA nerves with no or minimal injury to the surrounding tissue. The proposed laser-assisted RDN may enhance physiological effects with insignificant complications in in vivo situations. Further in vivo studies will be conducted to validate the current findings by evaluating the extent of blood pressure reduction and norepinephrine changes after the laser-assisted RDN on a large animal model.

Is Renal Denervation Effective in Treating Resistant Hypertension?

Resistant hypertension is diagnosed in patients whose blood pressure target is unmet despite the use of three or more antihypertensive medications. Systemic sympathetic hyperactivation is associated with the development of resistant hypertension. As the kidney is largely pervasive of the sympathetic nervous system renal denervation procedure was developed to control blood pressure by attenuating the renal and systemic sympathetic hyperactivity. Renal denervation is a minimally invasive procedure that uses radiofrequency or ultrasound energy waves to reduce the activity of the renal artery nerves. Previous clinical trials have shown conflicting results regarding the efficacy of the procedure. Symplicity HTN-1 and -2 trials showed effective blood pressure lowering results in the renal denervation group with a good safety profile. However, the Symplicity HTN-3 trial showed no difference in blood pressure lowering effect between the renal denervation and control Sham procedure groups. Notwithstanding, some recent clinical trials with Sham control and meta-analysis showed clinical benefits of renal denervation. Other clinical benefits of renal denervation include glucose control, cardiovascular protective effect, reduction of obstructive sleep apnea, and neuralgia control. A subset of patients with satisfactory blood pressure control response to the procedure may experience improved glucose control due to the overall reduced sympathetic activity and insulin resistance. Sympathetic activity control after renal denervation has cardioprotective effects, especially for those with arrhythmia and left ventricular hypertrophy. Also, renal denervation could be helpful in renalorigin pain control. Renal denervation is an effective, safe, non-invasive procedure with many clinical benefits beyond blood pressure control. Further development in the procedure technique and selection of target patients are needed for wider clinical use of renal denervation in resistant hypertension.

The Global Burden of Resistant Hypertension and Potential Treatment Options.

Resistant hypertension (RH) is defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) that remains .140 mmHg or .90 mmHg, respectively, despite an appropriate lifestyle and the use of optimal or maximally tolerated doses of a three-drug combination, including a diuretic. This definition encompasses the category of controlled RH, defined as the presence of blood pressure (BP) effectively controlled by four or more antihypertensive agents, as well as refractory hypertension, referred to as uncontrolled BP despite five or more drugs of different classes, including a diuretic. To confirm RH presence, various causes of pseudo-resistant hypertension (such as improper BP measurement techniques and poor medication adherence) and secondary hypertension must be ruled out. Inadequate BP control should be confirmed by out-of-office BP measurement. RH affects about 5% of the hypertensive population and is associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Once RH presence is confirmed, patient evaluation includes identification of contributing factors such as lifestyle issues or interfering drugs/substances and assessment of hypertension-mediated organ damage. Management of RH comprises lifestyle interventions and optimisation of current medication therapy. Additional drugs should be introduced sequentially if BP remains uncontrolled and renal denervation can be considered as an additional treatment option. However, achieving optimal BP control remains challenging in this setting. This review aims to provide an overview of RH, including its epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnostic work-up, as well as the latest therapeutic developments.

Effects of renal denervation on blood pressure in patients with hypertension: a latest systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized sham-controlled trials.

The efficacy of renal denervation (RDN) has been controversial, but recent randomized sham-controlled trials demonstrated significant blood pressure reductions after RDN in patients with hypertension. We conducted a systematic review and updated meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of RDN on ambulatory and office blood pressures in patients with hypertension. Databases were searched up to 15 November 2023 to identify randomized, sham-controlled trials of RDN. The primary endpoint was change in 24 h ambulatory systolic blood pressure (SBP) with RDN versus sham control. The secondary endpoints were changes in 24 h ambulatory diastolic blood pressure, daytime and nighttime blood pressure (BP), office BP, and home BP. A sub-analysis determined outcomes by medication, procedure, and device. From twelve trials, 2222 patients with hypertension were randomized to undergo RDN (n = 1295) or a sham procedure (n = 927). At 2-6 months after treatment, RDN significantly reduced 24 h ambulatory SBP by 2.81 mmHg (95% confidence interval: -4.09, -1.53; p < 0.001) compared with the sham procedure. RDN also reduced daytime SBP by 3.17 mmHg (- 4.75, - 1.58; p < 0.001), nighttime SBP by 3.41 mmHg (- 4.69, - 2.13; p < 0.001), office SBP by 4.95 mmHg (- 6.37, - 3.54; p < 0.001), and home SBP by 4.64 mmHg (- 7.44, - 1.84; p = 0.001) versus the sham control group. There were no significant differences in the magnitude of BP reduction between first- and second-generation trials, between devices, or between with or without medication. These data from randomized sham-controlled trials showed that RDN significantly reduced all blood pressure metrics in medicated or unmedicated patients with hypertension, including resistant/uncontrolled hypertension.

Long-Term Changes in Atrial Arrhythmia Burden After Renal Denervation Combined With Pulmonary Vein Isolation: SYMPLICITY-AF.

BACKGROUND: The autonomic nervous system plays an important role in atrial fibrillation (AF) and hypertension. Renal denervation (RDN) lowers blood pressure (BP), but its role in AF is poorly understood. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether RDN reduces AF recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). METHODS: This study randomized patients from 8 centers (United States, Germany) with drug-refractory AF for treatment with PVI+RDN vs PVI alone. A multielectrode radiofrequency Spyral catheter system was used for RDN. Insertable cardiac monitors were used for continuous rhythm monitoring. The primary efficacy endpoint was ≥2 minutes of AF recurrence or repeat ablation during all follow-up. The secondary endpoints included atrial arrhythmia (AA) burden, discontinuation of class I/III antiarrhythmic drugs, and BP changes from baseline. RESULTS: A total of 70 patients with AF (52 paroxysmal, 18 persistent) and uncontrolled hypertension were randomized (RDN+PVI, n = 34; PVI, n = 36). At 3.5 years, 26.2% and 21.4% of patients in RDN+PVI and PVI groups, respectively, were free from the primary efficacy endpoint (log rank P = 0.73). Patients with mean ≥1 h/d AA had less daily AA burden after RDN+PVI vs PVI (4.1 hours vs 9.2 hours; P = 0.016). More patients discontinued class I/III antiarrhythmic drugs after RDN+PVI vs PVI (45% vs 14%; P = 0.040). At 1 year, systolic BP changed by -17.8 ± 12.8 mm Hg and -13.7 ± 18.8 mm Hg after RDN+PVI and PVI, respectively (P = 0.43). The composite safety endpoint was not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with AF and uncontrolled BP, RDN+PVI did not prevent AF recurrence more than PVI alone. However, RDN+PVI may reduce AF burden and antiarrhythmic drug usage, but this needs further prospective validation.

Efficacy and Safety of Radiofrequency-Based Renal Denervation on Resistant Hypertensive Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: New therapies for resistant hypertension (RH), including renal denervation (RDN), have been studied. AIM: Access the safety and effectiveness of radiofrequency-based RDN vs pharmacological treatment for RH. METHODS: A thorough literature search was conducted across PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane databases, focusing on studies that compared the effects of radiofrequency-based RDN versus pharmacological treatment for RH. Treatment effects for binary and continuous endpoints were pooled and used, respectively, odds-ratio (OR) and mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) to analyze continuous outcomes. RESULTS: In the 10 included studies, involving 1.182 patients, 682 received radiofrequency-based RDN. The follow-up period ranged from 6 to 84 months. Analysis revealed that the RDN group had a significant reduction in office systolic blood pressure (BP) (MD - 9.5 mmHg; 95% CI - 16.81 to - 2.29; P = 0.01), office diastolic BP (MD - 5.1 mmHg; 95% CI - 8.42 to - 2.80; P < 0.001), 24 h systolic BP (MD - 4.8 mmHg; 95% CI - 7.26 to - 2.42; P < 0.001). For 24 h diastolic BP RDN did not have a significant reduction (MD - 2.3 mmHg; 95% CI - 4.19 to - 0.52; P = 0.012). The heterogeneity between the studies was high, visible in the funnel and Baujat plots. The OR was non-significant for non-serious adverse events, but also clinically significant for hypertensive crises and strokes for the RDN group. CONCLUSIONS: While the pharmacological regimen of 3 or more anti-hypertensive, including a diuretic, still be the first-line option for RH treatment, our results support that radiofrequency-based RDN is superior in reducing global BP and is safe.

Renal denervation for hypertensive heart disease and atrial fibrillation.

Accumulating evidence supports the efficacy of renal denervation (RDN) as an antihypertensive treatment. Additionally, several RDN clinical studies, including meta-analyses, have suggested that RDN may potentially have beneficial effects on left ventricular hypertrophy, diastolic function, and new-onset/recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF), although most studies were not randomized sham-controlled. In particular, the effects of RDN on left ventricular hypertrophy and AF recurrence appear to be relatively evident. Sympathetic activation plays a critical role in the development of hypertension, hypertensive heart disease, and AF. Notably, several studies suggest the cardioprotective effects of RDN even in the absence of significant blood pressure reduction, probably due to its sympathoinhibitory effects. It is imperative to establish the efficacy of RDN in patients with hypertensive heart disease and/or AF, focusing on parameters of sympathetic activity in the clinical setting, including randomized sham-controlled trials. Moreover, further basic research is essential to elucidate the therapeutic mechanisms of RDN beyond blood pressure lowering and the renal nerves-linked pathophysiologies of hypertensive heart disease and AF. This review outlines the effects of renal denervation on hypertensive heart disease, particularly on left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic function, and on atrial fibrillation. The sympathoinhibitory effect of renal denervation, an important potential mechanism of its beneficial effects on heart disease, is also discussed.

Renal denervation ameliorated salt-induced hypertension by improving cardiac work, cardiac enzyme and oxidative balance in Sprague-Dawley rats.

Background: Hypertension is associated with cardiovascular dysfunction, dysregulation of the antioxidant system and alteration of the level of some enzymes in the metabolic pathway. The possible modulatory effect of acute renal denervation (ARD) on cardiovascular function and the antioxidant system is still a subject of intense debate. This study sought to ascertain the ameliorative effects of ARD on cardiovascular parameters, antioxidant system, creatine kinase and lactate dehydrogenase levels. Methods: Thirty-six Sprague-Dawley rats (5-6 weeks old) were divided into 6 groups of 6 animals each consisting of Normal Salt, High Salt, Normal Salt + Sham Denervation, High Salt + Sham Denervation, Normal Salt + Renal Denervation and High Salt + Renal Denervation. Induction of hypertension with 8 % salt in the diet lasted for 8 weeks. Renal or Sham denervation was thereafter done on selected groups. At the end of the experimental period, cardiovascular parameters, plasma antioxidant status, plasma creatine kinase (CK) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels were assessed. Significance level was set at p < 0.05. Results: Salt-loading significantly increased systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial blood pressure (MABP), rate pressure product (RPP) while reducing superoxide dismutase (SOD), reduced glutathione (GSH) and catalase (CAT). Acute renal denervation significantly (p < 0.0001) reduced SBP, DBP, MABP, RPP, LDH and norepinephrine level while increasing SOD, GSH and CAT. ARD did not significantly alter CK level. Conclusion: Acute renal denervation, by reducing sympathetic activity, ameliorates cardiovascular and antioxidant functions as well as reduces LDH level without significantly altering CK level in salt-induced hypertension.

Efficacy and safety of sympathetic mapping and ablation of renal nerves for the treatment of hypertension (SMART): 6-month follow-up of a randomised, controlled trial.

Background: Previous trials of renal denervation (RDN) have been designed to investigate reduction of blood pressure (BP) as the primary efficacy endpoint using non-selective RDN without intraoperatively verified RDN success. It is an unmet clinical need to map renal nerves, selectively denervate renal sympathetic nerves, provide readouts for the interventionalists and avoid futile RDN. We aimed to examine the safety and efficacy of renal nerve mapping/selective renal denervation (msRDN) in patients with uncontrolled hypertension (HTN) and determine whether antihypertensive drug burden is reduced while office systolic BP (OSBP) is controlled to target level (＜140 mmHg). Methods: We conducted a randomized, prospective, multicenter, single-blinded, sham-controlled trial. The study combined two efficacy endpoints at 6 months as primary outcomes: The control rate of patients with OSBP ＜140 mmHg (non-inferior outcome) and change in the composite index of antihypertensive drugs (Drug Index) in the treatment versus Sham group (superior outcome). This design avoids confounding from excess drug-taking in the Sham group. Antihypertensive drug burden was assessed by a composite index constructed as: Class N (number of classes of antihypertensive drugs) × (sum of doses). 15 hospitals in China participated in the study and 220 patients were enrolled in a 1:1 ratio (msRDN vs Sham). The key inclusion criteria included: age (18-65 years old), history of essential HTN (at least 6 months), heart rate (≥70 bpm), OSBP (≥150 mmHg and ≤180 mmHg), ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM, 24-h SBP ≥130 mmHg or daytime SBP ≥135 mmHg or nighttime SBP ≥120 mmHg), renal artery stenosis (＜50%) and renal function (eGFR ＞45 mL/min/1.73 m2). The catheter with both stimulation and ablation functions was inserted in the distal renal main artery. The RDN site (hot spot) was selected if SBP increased (≥5 mmHg) by intra-renal artery (RA) electrical stimulation; an adequate RDN was confirmed by repeated electronic stimulation if no increase in BP otherwise, a 2nd ablation was performed at the same site. At sites where there was decreased SBP (≥5 mmHg, cold spot) or no BP response (neutral spot) to stimulation, no ablation was performed. The mapping, ablation and confirmation procedure was repeated until the entire renal main artery had been tested then either treated or avoided. After msRDN, patients had to follow a predefined, vigorous drug titration regimen in order to achieve target OSBP (＜140 mmHg). Drug adherence was monitored by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis using urine. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02761811) and 5-year follow-up is ongoing. Findings: Between July 8, 2016 and February 23, 2022, 611 patients were consented, 220 patients were enrolled in the study who received standardized antihypertensive drug treatments (at least two drugs) for at least 28 days, presented OSBP ≥150 mmHg and ≤180 mmHg and met all inclusion and exclusion criteria. In left RA and right RA, mapped sites were 8.2 (3.0) and 8.0 (2.7), hot/ablated sites were 3.7 (1.4) and 4.0 (1.6), cold spots were 2.4 (2.6) and 2.0 (2.2), neutral spots were 2.0 (2.1) and 2.0 (2.1), respectively. Hot, cold and neutral spots was 48.0%, 27.5% and 24.4% of total mapped sites, respectively. At 6 M, the Control Rate of OSBP was comparable between msRDN and Sham group (95.4% vs 92.8%, p = 0.429), achieved non-inferiority margin -10% (2.69%; 95% CI -4.11%, 9.83%, p ＜ 0.001 for non-inferiority); the change in Drug Index was significantly lower in msRDN group compared to Sham group (4.37 (6.65) vs 7.61 (10.31), p = 0.010) and superior to Sham group (-3.25; 95% CI -5.56, -0.94, p = 0.003), indicating msRDN patients need significantly fewer drugs to control OSBP ＜140 mmHg. 24-hour ambulatory SBP decreased from 146.8 (13.9) mmHg by 10.8 (14.1) mmHg, and from 149.8 (12.8) mmHg by 10.0 (14.0) mmHg in msRDN and Sham groups, respectively (p < 0.001 from Baseline; p > 0.05 between groups). Safety profiles were comparable between msRDN and Sham groups, demonstrating the safety and efficacy of renal mapping/selective RDN to treat uncontrolled HTN. Interpretation: The msRDN therapy achieved the goals of reducing the drug burden of HTN patients and controlling OSBP <140 mmHg, with only approximately four targeted ablations per renal main artery, much lower than in previous trials. Funding: SyMap Medical (Suzhou), LTD, Suzhou, China.

Effects of renal denervation on the kidney: albuminuria, proteinuria, and renal function.

Renal denervation has attracted attention as a novel antihypertensive treatment for hypertensive patients who are poorly controlled by medicine. Clinical studies have shown the antihypertensive effects of renal denervation in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension. However, renal denervation potentially has other beneficial effects, such as improving glucose metabolism and cardioprotection beyond its antihypertensive effects. In this mini-review article, we summarize and discuss the effects of renal denervation on proteinuria, albuminuria, and renal function based on the recent findings of clinical studies, and review the renoprotective effects of renal denervation.

CT-guided ozone-mediated lumbar-renal sympathetic denervation for resistant hypertension treatment: A pilot single-arm clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) reduces blood pressure (BP). METHODS: This single-arm open-label study enrolled patients with resistant hypertension (RH) and treat them by CT-guided ozone mediated lumbar-renal sympathetic denervation (L-RDN). The primary endpoint was to assess the changes of BP over 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) and to evaluate the anti-hypertensive medication burden (AHMB) at 3-month follow-up. This study was registered in Chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR2300071375). RESULTS: 17 patients (mean age 65.12 ± 10.77 years) with AHMB of 4.12 ± 1.11 were enrolled. After the procedure, 7 patients (46.7 %) matched the criteria for antihypertensive medication reduction. The AHMB decreased to 3.87 ± 0.96 for the whole objectives and from 3.87 ± 0.96 to 3.55 ± 0.78 for patients with normal baseline renal function. On top of the lessened AHMB, L-RDN further reduced morning systolic BP (SBP) by -8.6 ± 4.0 mmHg (p = 0.034) and diastolic BP (DBP) by -4.6 ± 2.1 mmHg (p = 0.032) for all participants and morning SBP by -13.2 ± 3.6 mmHg (p < 0.001), morning DBP by -6.2 ± 2.4 mmHg (p = 0.011) and daytime SBP by -4.1 ± 1.6 mmHg (p = 0.009) for those with normal baseline renal function at 3-month of follow-up. No adverse events were reported intra- and post operation. CONCLUSIONS: CT-guided ozone-mediated L-RDN might be an innovative approach of RDN for treating RH. Confirmatory studies are warranted.

Sympathetic Pathophysiology in Hypertension Origins: The Path to Renal Denervation.

The importance of the sympathetic nervous system in essential hypertension has been recognized in 2 eras. The first was in early decades of the 20th century, through to the 1960s. Here, the sympathetic nervous system was identified as a target for the treatment of hypertension, and an extensive range of antiadrenergic therapies were developed. Then, after a period of lapsed interest, in a second era from 1985 on, the development of precise measures of human sympathetic nerve firing and transmitter release allowed demonstration of the importance of neural mechanisms in the initiation and maintenance of the arterial blood pressure elevation in hypertension. This led to the development of a device treatment of hypertension, catheter-based renal denervation, which we will discuss.

A novel, proof-of-concept radiofrequency renal denervation strategy to improve procedural efficiency: 12-month results from the SPYRAL DYSTAL pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) reduced blood pressure (BP) in multiple randomized sham-controlled trials of patients with uncontrolled hypertension (HTN). We tested proof-of-concept for a more selective treatment strategy, exclusively targeting these areas to improve the efficiency of the procedure. METHODS: The SPYRAL DYSTAL Pilot study was designed to mirror the SPYRAL HTN-OFF MED Pivotal study, enabling comparison with a propensity score adjusted active-control group. Patients were antihypertensive medication-free for one month before undergoing BP assessment. Those with office BP of 150-180/>90 mmHg and with an ambulatory systolic BP of 140-170 mmHg were selected to undergo open label treatment, delivering energy only to the distal main renal arteries and first order branches. Patients from DYSTAL were compared with patients who underwent maximized RF RDN treatment in the prior randomized OFF MED trial at 3 months. After 3 months, patients resumed antihypertensive medications as indicated. Safety and efficacy outcomes were assessed post hoc through 12 months. RESULTS: The SPYRAL DYSTAL Pilot study treated 56 HTN patients. Baseline office systolic BP (OSBP) and 24-h ambulatory systolic BP (ASBP) were similar between DYSTAL and OFF MED patient groups. The number of ablations (32.3 ± 8.0 vs 46.6 ± 15.3, p < 0.001), procedure time (67 ± 21 min vs 99 ± 36 min; p < 0.001), and contrast volume (173 ± 77 cc vs 208 ± 96 cc; p = 0.014) were significantly lower with the simplified treatment strategy. OSBP and ASBP changes compared with baseline were -9.0 and -1.4 mmHg at 3 months, -20.3 and -13.9 mmHg at 6 months, and -20.3 and -16.6 mmHg at 12 months, respectively. During the medication up-titration phase, BP reductions among DYSTAL patients were similar to reductions observed in OFF MED through 12 months, with comparable number of drugs (1.4 and 1.5 medications, respectively (P=NS)). Two adverse events related to guidewire placement were reported. CONCLUSION: In this pilot study, focusing ablation treatment on the distal main and proximal branch renal arteries was performed, resulting in fewer RF lesions, and reduced contrast volume and procedure time. Whether BP reductions are similar between a selective vs. maximized RDN approach requires further prospective study.

Cardiac sympathetic nerve activity trends after renal denervation in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

This case report describes the application of ultrasound renal denervation (uRDN) using the Paradise System in a patient with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Initially, the cardiac sympathetic nerve activity of the patient exhibited a late heart/mediastinum (H/M) ratio of 2.00 and a washout rate of 66.0% by cardiac iodine-123 metaiodobenzylguanidine (123I-MIBG) scintigraphy. Subsequently, the patient underwent transfemoral uRDN targeting the left, right upper, and right lower renal arteries. At the 6 month follow-up, no significant change was observed in 123I-MIBG findings; however, the estimated stressed blood volume (eSBV) decreased from 1722 to 1029 mL/70 kg. At 18 months, 123I-MIBG findings improved, with the late H/M ratio reaching 2.76 and the washout rate decreasing to 43.1%. This case report highlights the potential of uRDN in reducing eSBV within 6 months and subsequently improving cardiac sympathetic nerve activity at the 18 month follow-up.