Predicting Safe Liver Resection Volume for Major Hepatectomy Using Artificial Intelligence.

(1) Background: Advancements in the field of liver surgery have led to a critical need for precise estimations of preoperative liver function to prevent post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF), a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. This study introduces a novel application of artificial intelligence (AI) in determining safe resection volumes according to a patient's liver function in major hepatectomies. (2) Methods: We incorporated a deep learning approach, incorporating a unique liver-specific loss function, to analyze patient characteristics, laboratory data, and liver volumetry from computed tomography scans of 52 patients. Our approach was evaluated against existing machine and deep learning techniques. (3) Results: Our approach achieved 68.8% accuracy in predicting safe resection volumes, demonstrating superior performance over traditional models. Furthermore, it significantly reduced the mean absolute error in under-predicted volumes to 23.72, indicating a more precise estimation of safe resection limits. These findings highlight the potential of integrating AI into surgical planning for liver resections. (4) Conclusion: By providing more accurate predictions of safe resection volumes, our method aims to minimize the risk of PHLF, thereby improving clinical outcomes for patients undergoing hepatectomy.

Laparoscopic Right Hemihepatectomy after Future Liver Remnant Modulation: A Single Surgeon's Experience.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy (L-RHH) is still considered a technically complex procedure, which should only be performed by experienced surgeons in specialized centers. Future liver remnant modulation (FLRM) strategies, including portal vein embolization (PVE), and associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS), might increase the surgical difficulty of L-RHH, due to the distortion of hepatic anatomy, periportal inflammation, and fibrosis. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the safety and feasibility of L-RHH after FLRM, when compared with ex novo L-RHH. METHODS: All consecutive right hemihepatectomies performed by a single surgeon in the period between October 2007 and March 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The patient characteristics and perioperative outcomes of L-RHH after FLRM and ex novo L-RHH were compared. RESULTS: A total of 59 patients were included in the analysis, of whom 33 underwent FLRM. Patients undergoing FLRM prior to L-RHH were most often male (93.9% vs. 42.3%, p < 0.001), had an ASA-score >2 (45.5% vs. 9.5%, p = 0.006), and underwent a two-stage hepatectomy (45.5% vs. 3.8% p < 0.001). L-RHH after FLRM was associated with longer operative time (median 360 vs. 300 min, p = 0.008) and Pringle duration (31 vs. 24 min, p = 0.011). Intraoperative blood loss, unfavorable intraoperative incidents, and conversion rates were similar in both groups. There were no significant differences in length of hospital stay and 30-day overall and severe morbidity rates. Radical resection margin (R0) and textbook outcome rates were equal. One patient who underwent an extended RHH in the FLRM group deceased within 90 days of surgery, due to post-hepatectomy liver failure. CONCLUSION: L-RHH after FLRM is more technically complex than L-RHH ex novo, as objectified by longer operative time and Pringle duration. Nevertheless, this procedure appears safe and feasible in experienced hands.

Right hemihepatectomy preserving the fluorescently visible paracaval portion of the caudate lobe.

The paracaval portion (PC) of the caudate lobe is a small area of the liver located in front of the inferior vena cava. Conventional right hemihepatectomy (RH) along the Rex-Cantlie line involves resection of not only the anterior and posterior sections but also the PC behind the middle hepatic vein (MHV). However, to preserve the future liver remnant volume as much as possible, PC-preserving RH may be beneficial in selected patients. We injected an indocyanine green (ICG) solution in the PC portal branch under intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS) guidance and performed an RH preserving the fluorescently visible PC in a patient with liver metastasis. The patient was a 47-year-old male with a 24 ×10 cm metastatic hepatic tumor from sigmoid colon cancer. CT volumetry revealed that the left hemiliver excluding the caudate lobe was 55%, and the caudate lobe was 5.3%. Before hepatic transection, the ICG solution was injected into the PC portal branch under IOUS guidance. During hepatic transection, the PC was identified as a fluorescent area behind the MHV using a near-infrared imaging system. Thus, the anatomical right-side boundary of the caudate lobe was clearly found. Following RH, the PC was preserved as a fluorescently visible area. The patient had an uneventful recovery. RH preserving the fluorescently visible PC of the liver is a feasible procedure.

Right hemihepatectomy combined with ligation of the common hepatic artery and gastroduodenal artery for the treatment of intrahepatic HHT: A case report.

Hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) is a rare disease that lacks effective treatment. Here, the authors report the case of a 30-year-old woman presenting with abdominal pain accompanied by severe malnutrition. After a definite diagnosis of HHT involvement in the liver, liver transplantation was the first-choice treatment according to the guidelines of HHT. However, the patient firmly refused liver transplantation. Finally, a new type of surgery, right hemihepatectomy combined with ligation of the common hepatic artery and gastroduodenal artery, was performed based on careful study of the case and with the maximum benefit of the patient in mind. Although the patient developed transient liver dysfunction after surgery, she eventually recovered well and continued to be followed up. As far as we know, this is the first report of this kind of surgery for the treatment of intrahepatic HHT.

Recurrent acute portal vein thrombosis with severe abdominal infection after right hemihepatectomy in a patient with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: A case report and literature review.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a serious complication after hepatobiliary-pancreatic surgery. There have been few studies on recurrent PVT after hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 66-year-old woman who was diagnosed with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and treated with right hemihepatectomy. On the sixth day, the patient developed acute portal vein thrombosis, and emergency portal vein incision and surgical thrombectomy were performed. On the seventh day after thrombectomy, the patient developed acute portal vein thrombosis again, and portal vein thrombectomy+portal vein bridging was performed again. There was still thrombosis after the operation. The patient was then treated with superior mesenteric arteriography + indirect portal vein catheterization thrombolysis and local thrombolysis + anticoagulation and systemic anticoagulation therapy. The patient had a complicated abdominal infection. The total hospital stay was 84 days. There was no thrombosis in the portal vein at discharge. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Although the procedure was carefully performed with a preoperative plan and fine intraoperative vascular anastomosis, postoperative PVT occurred. There are many factors of portal vein thrombosis, and there are many treatment methods. CONCLUSION: PVT often develops in patients with liver cirrhosis postoperatively and after liver transplantation. Recurrent PVT after hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma is a rare complication.

Is the anterior approach suitable for laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy in patients with large HCC (5-10 cm)? A propensity score analysis.

BACKGROUND: Right hemihepatectomy via the anterior approach was initially employed to improve the survival of patients with large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). To date, the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy via the anterior approach (ALRH) for patients with large HCC remains unclear; thus, we compared short-term and long-term outcomes between ALRH and open right hemihepatectomy via the anterior approach (AORH). METHODS: 161 patients with HCC who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria in our department were enrolled in this study between January 2015 and August 2018. Perioperative and oncological outcomes were compared using propensity score matching analysis (PSM). RESULTS: There were 45 patients in the ALRH group and 116 patients in the AORH group. After 1:3 PSM, 40 ALRH patients and 95 AORH patients were well matched. The intraoperative time was longer in the ALRH group than in the AORH group after PSM (median, 297.5 vs. 205 min, P < 0.001). However, ALRH led to less intraoperative blood loss than AORH after PSM (median, 265 vs. 350 ml, P = 0.049). The rates of overall complications (12.5% vs. 30.5%, P = 0.028) in the ALRH group were significantly lower than those in the AORH group after PSM. Moreover, the survival outcomes were equivalent between the two groups with regard to 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates (P = 0.698) and disease-free survival rates (P = 0.510). CONCLUSION: ALRH could be safe and feasible for some patients with large HCCs (5-10 cm) when performed by experienced surgeons, and it had superior perioperative outcomes and equivalent oncological outcomes to AORH.

A clinical study using a new approach for laparoscopic radical resection of Bismuth-Corlette Ⅲa hilar cholangiocarcinoma / 中华肝胆外科杂志

Objective:To study the safety and feasibility of laparosocpic left-liver-first anterior radical modular orthotopic right hemihepatectomy (Lap-Larmorh) in treatment of Bismuth-Corlette type Ⅲa hilar cholangiocarcinoma.Methods:From June 2020 to April 2022, 13 patients with Bismuth-Corlette type Ⅲa hilar cholangiocarcinoma underwent Lap-Larmorh at the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery of the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University. There were 8 males and 5 females, aged (60.9±8.4) years. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, complications and postoperative survival were analyzed.Results:Five patients were treated with percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage to reduce jaundice before surgery. All 13 patients successfully underwent the Lap-Larmorh and there was no conversion to laparotomy. The operative time was [ M( Q1, Q3)] 390.0 (355.0, 435.0) minutes, and the intraoperative blood loss was [ M( Q1, Q3)] 800.0 (300.0, 1 100.0) ml. Postoperative complications occurred in 4 patients with pleural effusion, and 1 patient had portal vein thrombosis associated with pleural effusion, who was managed successfully using low molecular weight heparin sodium anticoagulation therapy and pleural effusion tapping. The postoperative hospital stay was (12.5±5.5) days, and there was no perioperative death. Intraoperative frozen pathology showed 12 patients with left hepatic duct with negative margins, and 1 patient with moderate dysplasia. Postoperative paraffin pathology showed 12 patients with bile duct adenocarcinoma, 1 patient with bile duct mucinous adenocarcinoma, 2 patients with tumors of high differentiation, 10 patients with moderate differentiation, and 1 patient with poor differentiative. The R 0 resection rate was 100.0% (13/13) and the tumor diameter was (2.9±0.9) cm. Follow-up by telephone or outpatient clinics after operation showed 1 patients to be lost to follow-up. The 1-year survival rate after operation was 66.7% (8/12). Conclusion:For Bismuth-Corlette type Ⅲa hilar cholangiocarcinoma, the new laparoscopic approach of Lap-Larmorh was safe and feasible.

Bisegmentectomy 7-8 for Small-for-Size Remanant Liver for Cirrhotic Patients Under Right Hemi-hepatectomy With Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Case-Matched Comparative Study.

Aim: To compare the short- and long-term treatment outcomes of bisegmentectomy 7-8 vs. right hepatectomy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and cirrhosis. Methods: Thirty six cirrhotic HCC patients with infiltration of right hepatic vein in segments 7-8 underwent bisegmentectomy 7-8 for small-for-size remanant liver under right hemi-hepatectomy. Its outcome was compared with a case-matched control group of cirrhotic HCC patients who underwent right hemi-hepatectomy during the study period. Results: The study group consisted of 36 patients and the control group 36 patients selected from 1,526 patients matched with age, tumor size, tumor location, and Pugh-Child staging. There were no significant differences between the two groups in operative parameters and in perioperative main complications which included hemorrhage, bile leakage, ascites, pleural effusion, and liver failure. The overall morbidity rate and morbidity rate classified according to Clavien's classification were similar. There was no in-hospital mortality or 90 day post-operative mortality. The mean follow-up was 30 and 32 months for the study group and control group, respectively. The disease free survival rate (DFS) for the study group was just significantly better than the control group. The median DFS was 24 months for the study group and 8 months for the control group (P = 0.049). Meanwhile, the median cumulative overall survival was 35 months for the study group and 27 months for the control group (P = 0.494). Conclusion: Bisegmentectomy 7-8 was safe and feasible for selected cirrhosis patients, and did not increase the perioperative risk and inferior long-term overall survival outcomes. It extended the indications for liver resection in patients with borderline volumes of future liver remnant for HCC cirrhotic liver.

Laparoscopic portal branch ligation of the right caudate lobe concomitant with portal vein embolization for planned right hemihepatectomy in advanced hepatobiliary cancers.

BACKGROUND: The role of ligation of the portal venous branches to the caudate lobe (cPVL) as preparation for planned major hepatectomy is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic cPVL (Lap-cPVL) concomitant with transileocolic portal vein embolization of the right portal venous system (rTIPE), namely, Lap-cPVL/rTIPE, for planned right hemihepatectomy (rHx) in advanced hepatobiliary cancer patients. METHODS: Thirty-one patients who underwent rHx after rTIPE with/without Lap-cPVL between March 2013 and March 2020 were enrolled in this study. The Lap-cPVL was performed for the portal branches of the right caudate lobe. RESULTS: Eight of the 31 patients underwent Lap-cPVL/rTIPE. The degree of hypertrophy was significantly increased in Lap-cPVL/rTIPE (19.3%, range 6.5-25.6%) as compared to rTIPE (7.2%, range - 1.1 to 21.2%) (p=0.027). The functional kinetic growth rate was also significantly increased in Lap-cPVL/rTIPE (5.40%, range 2.17-5.97) than that in rTIPE (1.85%, range - 0.22 to 6.45%) (p=0.046). Postoperative liver failure ≧ grade B occurred in 21.7% of patients in rTIPE, while there was no postoperative liver failure ≧ grade B in Lap-cPVL/rTIPE. Mortality rates were zero after rHx in this study. CONCLUSIONS: Lap-cPVL/rTIPE is safe and provides an additional effect on liver hypertrophy in advanced hepatobiliary cancers.

Application value of Laennec approach in laparoscopic anatomical right hemihepatectomy / 中华消化外科杂志

Objective:To investigate the application value of Laennec approach in laparoscopic anatomical right hemihepatectomy (LARH).Methods:The retrospective and descriptive study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 2 female patients who underwent LARH via Laennec approach in the First Affiliated Hospital of Kangda College of Nanjing Medical University from May to July 2020 were collected. The two patients were 51 and 57 years old, respectively. Observation indicators: (1) surgical situations; (2) postoperative situations and follow-up. Follow-up using outpatient examination and telephone interview was conducted to detect post-operative survival and tumor recurrence of patients up to December 2020. Count data were repre-sented as absolute numbers.Results:(1) Surgical situations: 2 patients successfully underwent LARH via Laennec approach, without conversion to open surgery. The operation time was 180 minutes and 185 minutes, and the volume of intraoperative blood loss was 200 mL and 400 mL, respectively. No blood transfusion or gastrointestinal decompression was performed in either patient. (2) Postoperative situations and follow-up: 2 patients began to take liquid diet on the first day and out-of-bed activities on the postoperative second to third day. There was no postoperative bile fistula or bleeding, but different degrees of peritoneal and pleural effusion occurred to the 2 patients after operation. One case was improved after right-sided thoracentesis and chest tube drainage due to dyspnea, and the other case was cured after conservative therapy. There was no perioperative death. The duration of postoperative hospital stay of 2 patients was 13 days and 11 days, respectively. Results of pathological examination showed 1 case of hepatic hemangioma and 1 case of primary liver cancer, respectively. The Laennec capsule was observed on the hepatic vein branches of segment Ⅴ, Ⅵ, Ⅶ, Ⅷ, and the gap existed between the Laennec capsule and the hepatic vein. Two patients were followed up for 7 months and 5 months，respectively. They survived during the follow-up，without tumor recurrence.Conclusion:It is safe and feasible to perform LARH by Laennec approach.

Comparison of liver regeneration in laparoscopic versus open right hemihepatectomy for adult living donor liver transplantation.

BACKGROUNDS/AIMS: This study aims to compare differences between laparoscopic donor right hemihepatectomy (LDRH) and open donor right hemihepatectomy (ODRH) in the quality of the operation, postoperative complications, and liver regeneration measured via volumetry. METHODS: This study included 119 patients who underwent living donor right hemihepatectomy at Samsung Medical Center from January 2016 to December 2017. We compared several aspects of LDRH and ODRH and analyzed the results using the independent t-test, chi-square test and Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Among 119 enrolled patients, 66 patients (55.5%) underwent open surgery, and 53 patients (44.5%) underwent laparoscopic surgery. The mean operation time was significantly shorter for ODRH (290.57±54.04 minutes) than LDRH (312.28±53.5 minutes) (p=0.031). Estimated blood loss was significantly less in LDRH (258.49±119.99 ml) than ODRH (326.52±157.68 ml) (p=0.011). The remnant liver recovered to 83.35±10.71% of the preoperative estimate whole liver volume (pre-EWLV) in the ODRH group and 84.04±8.98% of the pre-EWLV in the LDRH group (p=0.707). The percentage of increased estimated liver volume to postoperative estimate remnant liver volume (post-ERLV) was 137.62±40.34% in the ODRH group and 130.56±36.78% in the LDRH group, and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p=0.326). An analysis of postoperative complications showed no significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: LDRH is safe, and there is no significant difference in hepatic regeneration compared with ODRH. Therefore, LDRH can be applied for living donation of liver.

Laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy versus laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in posterior segments: Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS:: This study was designed to analyze the feasibility of laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy compared to laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma located in the posterior segments. MATERIAL AND METHODS:: The study included patients who underwent either laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy or laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma located in segment 6 or 7 from January 2009 to December 2016 at Samsung Medical Center. After 1:1 propensity score matching, patient baseline characteristics and operative and postoperative outcomes were compared between the two groups. Disease-free survival and overall survival were compared using Kaplan-Meier log-rank test. RESULTS:: Among 61 patients with laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy and 37 patients with laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy, 30 patients from each group were analyzed after propensity score matching. After matching, baseline characteristics of the two groups were similar including tumor size (3.4 ± 1.2 cm in laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy vs 3.7 ± 2.1 cm in laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy, P = 0.483); differences were significant before matching (3.1 ± 1.3 cm in laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy vs 4.3 ± 2.7 cm in laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy, P = 0.035). No significant differences were observed in operative and postoperative data except for free margin size (1.04 ± 0.71 cm in laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy vs 2.95 ± 1.75 cm in laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy, P < 0.001). Disease-free survival (5-year survival: 38.0% in laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy vs 47.0% in laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy, P = 0.510) and overall survival (5-year survival: 92.7% in laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy vs 89.6% in laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy, P = 0.593) did not differ between the groups based on Kaplan-Meier log-rank test. CONCLUSION:: For hepatocellular carcinoma in the posterior segments, laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy was feasible compared to laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy when performed by experienced laparoscopic surgeons.

A Glissonean Approach with Individual Isolation During Right Hemi-Hepatectomy After Portal Vein Embolization.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Although the Glissonean approach in hemi-hepatectomy is a very useful technique, right hemi-hepatectomy with Glissonean approach after portal vein embolization (PVE) is difficult because of the obstructing materials located at the right portal branch. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of the Glissonean approach with an individual isolation technique (GI technique) in right hemi-hepatectomies after PVE. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 21 patients who underwent the GI technique between March 2007 and June 2012. RESULTS: In one of the 21 patients, we could not perform the GI technique because of severe adhesions following previous operation; however, there were no troubles in the remaining 20 cases. In addition, none of the patients that were treated using this method developed massive ascites after right hemi-hepatectomy, despite 8 patients (40%) exhibiting severe fibrosis (F3 or F4). CONCLUSION: Even in right hemi-hepatectomy following PVE, our GI technique may be a useful procedures for patients.

Pure 3D laparoscopic living donor right hemihepatectomy in a donor with separate right posterior and right anterior hepatic ducts and portal veins.

BACKGROUND: Despite increases in the performance of pure laparoscopic living donor hepatectomy, variations in the bile duct or portal vein have been regarded as relative contraindications to this technique [1-3]. This report describes a donor with separate right posterior and right anterior hepatic ducts and portal veins who underwent pure laparoscopic living donor right hemihepatectomy, integrated with 3D laparoscopy and indocyanine green (ICG) near-infrared fluorescence cholangiography [1, 4, 5]. METHODS: A 50-year-old man offered to donate part of his liver to his older brother, who required a transplant for hepatitis B-associated liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Donor height was 178.0 cm, body weight was 82.7 kg, and body mass index was 26.1 kg/m2. Preoperative computed tomography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography showed that the donor had separate right posterior and right anterior hepatic ducts and portal veins. The entire procedure was performed under 3D laparoscopic view. Following intravenous injections of 0.05 mg/kg ICG, ICG near-infrared fluorescence camera was used to demarcate the exact transection line and determine the optimal bile duct division point. RESULTS: The total operation time was 443 min; the donor required no transfusions and experienced no intraoperative complications. The graft weighed 1146 g with a graft-to-recipient weight ratio of 1.88%. The optimal bile duct division point was identified using ICG fluorescence cholangiography, and the bile duct was divided with good patency without any stricture. The right anterior and posterior portal veins were transected with endostaplers without any torsion. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 8, with no complications. CONCLUSION: Using a 3D view and ICG fluorescence cholangiography, pure 3D laparoscopic living donor right hemihepatectomy is feasible in a donor with separate right posterior and right anterior hepatic ducts and portal veins.

Laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy following a standardized technique / 中华肝胆外科杂志

Objective To determine the clinical value of laparoscopic right hepatectomy (LRH) carried out following a standardized technique.Methods The medical records of 15 patients who underwent LRH at the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University were retrospectively reviewed.The perioperative indicators which included the operation duration,blood loss,tumor diameter,hospitalization duration and postoperative complications were analyzed.Results There was no conversion to open surgery.The operation duration was (251.1 ± 73.3) min.The resected tumor diameter was (8.5 ± 4.2) cm,the blood loss was (550.8 ± 343.6) ml,and the hospitalization duration was (10.2 ± 3.7) days.There was one patient who developed postoperative bile leakage.There was no other complication and there was no perioperative death.Conclusions The standardized technique of LRH was easy and effective.This technique shortened the operation duration and improved patient safety.

Total laparoscopic living donor right hemihepatectomy: first case in China mainland and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Total laparoscopic living donor right hemihepatectomy (LDRH) has been performed in several experienced transplant center [1-4]. We here report the first case of LDRH in China mainland and literature review. METHODS: A 47-year-old man volunteered for living donation to his wife who suffered sclerosing cholangitis-related liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. RESULTS: Donor height is 165 cm and weight is 65 kg, while the BMI is 23.9. Preoperative liver function tests were normal. The CT volume evaluation showed that the graft to body weight ratio (GBWR) was 1.42 % and the remnant liver volume was 36.3 % for right graft without middle hepatic vein. Biopsy result showed minimal steatosis. The anatomy of hepatic vein, artery, portal vein and bile duct was normal. A transection was performed along the cut line which was to the right side of middle hepatic vein. Two branches of the middle hepatic vein (Segment V and Segment VIII) were <5 mm in diameter, with no need of reconstruction. Hilar dissection was meticulously performed. Right portal vein, hepatic artery and bile duct were transected above the bifurcation. The right liver graft was placed in a retrieval bag and removed from suprapubic incision. The real graft volume was 660 ml with a revised GBWR of 1.14 %. Warm ischemia time was about 4 min. The postoperative course was uneventful for the donor. Literature review is shown in Table 1. CONCLUSION: Total LDRH has been demonstrated technically feasible in selected adult donors. It may be a safe and minimally invasive option for adult donors in experienced transplant center.

Experience of right hemihepatectomy for treatment of hepatolithiasis in the right or both lobes / 第二军医大学学报

Objective: To summarize our experience on right hemihepatectomy for treatment of hepatolithiasis. Methods: The clinical data of thirty-nine patients suffering from intrahepatic bile duct stones, who had undergone right hemihepatectomy in our hospital from Jan. 2000 to Dec. 2006, were retrospectively analyzed. The outcomes of operation, complication, and the follow-up findings were analyzed; and the clinical experience was summarized. Results: The 39 patients included 8 males and 31 females, with an age range of 23-65 years old and a mean of (44.2 ± 10.5) years old. All patients had various degrees of hepatobiliary stricture. All cases underwent right hemihepatectomy plus eholedoehotomy and T-tube drainage, including 28 also had cholecystectomy, 1 had additional left lateral hepatectomy, 1 had choledoehocystomy plus hepatojejunostomy, and 1 had demolishment of anastomotie stoma of choledochoduodenostomy. The post-operation complications included pleural effusion (17.9%), subphrenic infection (12.8%), liver failure (7.7%), biliary fistula (5.1%), and infection of incisional wound (5.l%). Two patients (5.1%) died of liver failure during the hospital stay. One was indicated of having intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and died of recurrence of cholangiocarcinoma 6 months after operation. Thirty-six patients (92.3%) received long-term follow-up (a median of [42.5±2.5] months) and 34 (94.4%) of them were symptom free. Excellent outcomes were achieved in the 31 patients with isolated right intrahepatic bile duct stones. Conclusion: Right hemihepatectomy is effective for right hepatolithiasis, especially for patients combined with right hepatic duct stricture. However, it should be noted that the operation is very difficult and has many complications, so the indications and contraindications of right hemihepatectomy should be strictly selected.