Rigidez carotídea y riesgo de eventos vasculares y mortalidad: el estudio REGICOR / Carotid artery stiffness and risk of vascular events and mortality: the REGICOR study

Introducción y objetivos: Los objetivos son analizar la relación dosis-respuesta de la rigidez de la arteria carótida y la mortalidad y evaluar su capacidad predictiva. Métodos: Estudio de cohorte poblacional que incluyó a 6.468 participantes, con una mediana de seguimiento de 6,5 años. Se evaluaron 6 índices de rigidez. Se identificaron los eventos coronarios y cerebrovasculares y la mortalidad. Resultados: La rigidez carotídea, el coeficiente de Peterson y la velocidad de la onda de pulso (VOP) se asociaron de manera lineal y directa con los eventos cerebrovasculares: aumento del 8% (IC95%, 1-16%) por unidad de rigidez, del 7% (IC95%, 2-13%) cada 10 unidades del coeficiente de Peterson y del 26% (IC95%, 8-48%) por unidad de la VOP. La tensión carotídea se asoció de modo no lineal con el riesgo de enfermedad coronaria: en valores <0,09 unidades, cada aumento de 0,01 unidades se asoció con una disminución de un 16% del riesgo (IC95%, –33 a +6%); por encima de 0,09 unidades, cada incremento de 0,01 unidades se asoció con un aumento de un 16% del riesgo (IC95%, 6-27%). La inclusión de estos índices no mejoró la capacidad predictiva de las funciones de riesgo. Conclusiones: La rigidez carotídea, el coeficiente de elasticidad de Peterson y la VOP tienen una relación lineal y directa con el riesgo de enfermedad cerebrovascular. La tensión (strain) carotídea tiene una relación en U con el riesgo de enfermedad coronaria. Estos índices no contribuyen a mejorar la capacidad predictiva de las funciones de riesgo. (AU)

Introduction and objectives: The aims of this study were to determine the dose-response association of carotid arterial stiffness with vascular outcomes and overall mortality, and to assess their added predictive capacity. Methods: Population-based cohort study including 6468 individuals, with a median follow-up of 6.5 years. Six carotid artery stiffness indices were assessed: strain, stiffness, Peterson elasticity coefficient, compliance coefficient, distensibility coefficient, and pulse wave velocity (PWV). Incident coronary, cerebrovascular, global vascular, and total fatal events were identified. Results: Carotid compliance and distensibility coefficients were not associated with any of the outcomes. Carotid stiffness, Peterson elasticity coefficient, and PWV showed a direct linear relationship to cerebrovascular disease: the risk increased by 8% (95%CI, 1-16) per stiffness unit increase, by 7% (95%CI, 2-13) per 10-unit Peterson elasticity coefficient increase, and by 26% (95%CI, 8-48) per PWV unit increase. Carotid strain showed a nonlinear association with ischemic heart disease. When strain was ≤ 0.09 units, each 0.01-unit increase was associated with a 15% lower risk of coronary events (95%CI,−33 to 6); above 0.09 units, each 0.01 increase in strain was associated with a 16% higher risk of coronary events (95%CI, 6-27). The addition of the stiffness indices did not improve the predictive capacity of validated risk functions. Conclusions: Carotid stiffness, Peterson elasticity coefficient, and PWV have a direct linear association with cerebrovascular disease risk. Carotid strain is not linearly related to U-shaped ischemic heart disease risk. The inclusion of these indexes does not improve the predictive capacity of risk functions. (AU)

Carotid artery stiffness and risk of vascular events and mortality: the REGICOR study.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to determine the dose-response association of carotid arterial stiffness with vascular outcomes and overall mortality, and to assess their added predictive capacity. METHODS: Population-based cohort study including 6468 individuals, with a median follow-up of 6.5 years. Six carotid artery stiffness indices were assessed: strain, stiffness, Peterson elasticity coefficient, compliance coefficient, distensibility coefficient, and pulse wave velocity (PWV). Incident coronary, cerebrovascular, global vascular, and total fatal events were identified. RESULTS: Carotid compliance and distensibility coefficients were not associated with any of the outcomes. Carotid stiffness, Peterson elasticity coefficient, and PWV showed a direct linear relationship to cerebrovascular disease: the risk increased by 8% (95%CI, 1-16) per stiffness unit increase, by 7% (95%CI, 2-13) per 10-unit Peterson elasticity coefficient increase, and by 26% (95%CI, 8-48) per PWV unit increase. Carotid strain showed a nonlinear association with ischemic heart disease. When strain was ≤ 0.09 units, each 0.01-unit increase was associated with a 15% lower risk of coronary events (95%CI,-33 to 6); above 0.09 units, each 0.01 increase in strain was associated with a 16% higher risk of coronary events (95%CI, 6-27). The addition of the stiffness indices did not improve the predictive capacity of validated risk functions. CONCLUSIONS: Carotid stiffness, Peterson elasticity coefficient, and PWV have a direct linear association with cerebrovascular disease risk. Carotid strain is not linearly related to U-shaped ischemic heart disease risk. The inclusion of these indexes does not improve the predictive capacity of risk functions.

Association Between Coronary Artery Disease Genetic Variants and Subclinical Atherosclerosis: An Association Study and Meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Recent studies have identified several genetic variants associated with coronary artery disease. Some of these genetic variants are not associated with classical cardiovascular risk factors and the mechanism of such associations is unclear. The aim of the study was to determine whether these genetic variants are related to subclinical atherosclerosis measured by carotid intima media thickness, carotid stiffness, and ankle brachial index. METHODS: A cross-sectional study nested in the follow-up of the REGICOR cohort was undertaken. The study included 2667 individuals. Subclinical atherosclerosis measurements were performed with standardized methods. Nine genetic variants were genotyped to assess associations with subclinical atherosclerosis, individually and in a weighted genetic risk score. A systematic review and meta-analysis of previous studies that analyzed these associations was undertaken. RESULTS: Neither the selected genetic variants nor the genetic risk score were significantly associated with subclinical atherosclerosis. In the meta-analysis, the rs1746048 (CXCL12; n = 10581) risk allele was directly associated with carotid intima-media thickness (ß = 0.008; 95% confidence interval, 0.001-0.015), whereas the rs6725887 (WDR12; n = 7801) risk allele was inversely associated with this thickness (ß = -0.013; 95% confidence interval, -0.024 to -0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The analyzed genetic variants seem to mediate their association with coronary artery disease through different mechanisms. Our results generate the hypothesis that the CXCL12 variant appears to influence coronary artery disease risk through arterial remodeling and thickening, whereas the WDR12 risk variant could be related to higher plaque vulnerability.