Neuropathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 in human neuronal, microglial and glial cells.

Neurological complications, both acute and chronic, are reported commonly in COVID-19 affected individuals. In this context, the understanding of pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 in specific cells of central nervous system (CNS) origin is relevant. The present study explores infection biology of a clinical isolate of SARS-CoV-2 in human cell lines of neural origin such as the glioblastoma (U87-MG), neuroblastoma (SHSY5Y) and microglia (C20). Despite showing clear evidence of infection by immunofluorescence with an anti-spike protein antibody, all the three neural cell lines were observed to be highly restrictive to the replication of the infecting virus. While the U87-MG glioblastoma cells demonstrated no cytopathic effects and a low viral titre with no signs of replication, the SHSY5Y neuroblastoma cells exhibited cytopathic effects with bleb formation but no evidence of viable virus. The C20 microglial cells showed neither signs of cytopathic effects nor viable virus. Ultrastructural studies demonstrated intracellular virions in infected neural cells. The presence of lipid droplets in infected SHSY5Y cells suggested an impact on host cell metabolism. The decrease in viral RNA levels over time in all the neural cell lines suggested restricted viral replication. In conclusion, this study highlights the limited susceptibility of neural cells to SARS-CoV-2 infection. This reduced permissibility of neural cell lines to SARS-CoV-2 may point to their inherent lower expression of receptors that support viral entry in addition to the intracellular factors that potently inhibit viral replication. The study findings prompt further investigation into the mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 infection of neural cells.

Consequence of COVID-19 on allergic asthma outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Asthma is a common chronic lung disease, and COVID-19 pandemic as a respiratory viral disease led to lung infection and resulted in millions of deaths. So, the impact of COVID-19 on asthma outcomes and the risk of being infected or hospitalized should be clarified. Systematic review and meta-analysis on the outcomes and risk of asthma for people with COVID-19 was done by searching electronic databases between 1 December 2019 and 31 July 2023. A total of 48 studies from 27 countries spread across all continents were included in the review. The prevalence of asthma among COVID-19 patients was 7.9%, and the analysis demonstrated a 16.5% reduction in the risk ratio for acquiring COVID-19 among subjects with asthma compared to those without asthma. There was no statistically significant difference in hospitalization risk, ICU admission risk, and death risk for COVID-19 patients with no asthma compared to those with asthma. The risk of death from COVID-19 was similar between nonasthmatics and asthmatics. The findings indicated that subjects with asthma may be at a lower risk of having infection with COVID-19 compared to those without asthma, but they have a similar risk of hospitalization and mortality.

Canada's approach to SARS-CoV-2 sero-surveillance: Lessons learned for routine surveillance and future pandemics.

SETTING: In Canada's federated healthcare system, 13 provincial and territorial jurisdictions have independent responsibility to collect data to inform health policies. During the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2023), national and regional sero-surveys mostly drew upon existing infrastructure to quickly test specimens and collect data but required cross-jurisdiction coordination and communication. INTERVENTION: There were 4 national and 7 regional general population SARS-CoV-2 sero-surveys. Survey methodologies varied by participant selection approaches, assay choices, and reporting structures. We analyzed Canadian pandemic sero-surveillance initiatives to identify key learnings to inform future pandemic planning. OUTCOMES: Over a million samples were tested for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies from 2020 to 2023 but siloed in 11 distinct datasets. Most national sero-surveys had insufficient sample size to estimate regional prevalence; differences in methodology hampered cross-regional comparisons of regional sero-surveys. Only four sero-surveys included questionnaires. Sero-surveys were not directly comparable due to different assays, sampling methodologies, and time-frames. Linkage to health records occurred in three provinces only. Dried blood spots permitted sample collection in remote populations and during stay-at-home orders. IMPLICATIONS: To provide timely, high-quality information for public health decision-making, routine sero-surveillance systems must be adaptable, flexible, and scalable. National capability planning should include consortiums for assay design and validation, defined mechanisms to improve test capacity, base documents for data linkage and material transfer across jurisdictions, and mechanisms for real-time communication of data. Lessons learned will inform incorporation of a robust sero-survey program into routine surveillance with strategic sampling and capacity to adapt and scale rapidly as a part of a comprehensive national pandemic response plan.

RéSUMé: CONTEXTE: Au Canada, où le système de santé est fédéré, les 13 juridictions provinciales et territoriales ont la responsabilité individuelle de recueillir les données qui leur permettent d'élaborer leurs politiques de santé. Lors de la pandémie de COVID-19 (2020­2023), pour réaliser les enquêtes de séroprévalence à l'échelle régionale et nationale, les autorités ont principalement utilisé l'infrastructure existante pour pouvoir analyser les échantillons et recueillir des données rapidement, mais cela a également nécessité de la communication et de la coordination entre les différentes juridictions. INTERVENTION: Au Canada, il y a eu quatre enquêtes nationales et sept enquêtes régionales sur la séroprévalence du SARS-CoV-2 dans la population générale. Les méthodologies utilisées différaient selon la méthode de sélection des participants, le choix des tests d'analyses et les structures de rapports. Nous avons analysé la façon dont ces enquêtes avaient été réalisées afin d'en dégager des éléments essentiels qui permettront de planifier pour les futures pandémies. RéSULTATS: Entre 2020 et 2023, plus d'un million d'échantillons, répartis en 11 ensembles de données distincts, ont été analysés afin de rechercher la présence d'anticorps au SARS-CoV-2. Dans la plupart des enquêtes nationales, la taille de l'échantillon était insuffisante pour pouvoir estimer la prévalence à l'échelle régionale. La disparité des méthodologies utilisées a entravé la comparaison des enquêtes régionales. Seules quatre enquêtes fournissaient les données recueillies à partir des questionnaires. Il a été impossible de comparer les enquêtes entre elles en raison de la diversité des tests d'analyse utilisés, des méthodes d'échantillonnage et de la durée des enquêtes. Seules trois provinces avaient couplé leurs données avec les archives médicales. Pour réaliser les enquêtes dans les populations éloignées et lors des périodes de confinement, la méthode d'analyse sur gouttes de sang séché a été utilisée. CONCLUSION: Afin de pouvoir fournir, en temps et en heure, des données de haute qualité pour la prise de décisions en matière de santé publique, un système de sérosurveillance continuelle doit être adaptable, modulable et évolutif. En cas de pandémie, un plan national doit prévoir des consortiums pour la conception et la validation des tests d'analyse, des moyens d'amélioration de la capacité de dépistage, des documents de base pour le couplage des données, un mode de transfert du matériel entre les différentes juridictions et des moyens pour une communication en temps réel des données. Les leçons tirées de cette analyse permettront de mettre en place un solide programme d'enquêtes de séroprévalence au sein des systèmes de sérosurveillance continuelle, et que ce programme sera accompagné d'une stratégie d'échantillonnage et d'un plan d'intervention national, rapide et complet en cas de pandémie.

SARS-CoV-2 spike protein potentiates platelet aggregation via upregulating integrin αIIbß3 outside-in signaling pathway.

Platelet hyperreactivity is one of the crucial causes of coagulative disorders in patients with COVID-19. Few studies have indicated that integrin αIIbß3 may be a potential target for spike protein binding to platelets. This study aims to investigate whether spike protein interacts with platelet integrin αIIbß3 and upregulates outside-in signaling to potentiate platelet aggregation. In this study, we found that spike protein significantly potentiated platelet aggregation induced by different agonists and platelet spreading in vitro. Mechanism studies revealed that spike protein upregulated the outside-in signaling, such as increased thrombin-induced phosphorylation of ß3, c-Src. Moreover, using tirofiban to inhibit spike protein binding to αIIbß3 or using PP2 to block outside-in signaling, we found that the potentiating effect of spike protein on platelet aggregation was abolished. These results demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 spike protein directly enhances platelet aggregation via integrin αIIbß3 outside-in signaling, and suggest a potential target for platelet hyperreactivity in patients with COVID-19. HIGHLIGHTS: • Spike protein potentiates platelet aggregation and upregulates αIIbß3 outside-in signaling. • Spike protein interacts with integrin αIIbß3 to potentiate platelet aggregation. • Blocking outside-in signaling abolishes the effect of spike protein on platelets.

Severity predictors for multisystemic inflammatory syndrome in children after SARS-CoV-2 infection in Vietnam.

Multisystemic inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) might manifest in a broad spectrum of clinical scenarios, ranging from mild features to multi-organ dysfunction and mortality. However, this novel entity has a heterogenicity of data regarding prognostic factors associated with severe outcomes. The present study aimed to identify independent predictors for severity by using multivariate regression models. A total of 391 patients (255 boys and 136 girls) were admitted to Vietnam National Children's Hospital from January 2022 to June 2023. The median age was 85 (range: 2-188) months, and only 12 (3.1%) patients had comorbidities. 161 (41.2%) patients required PICU admission, and the median PICU LOS was 4 (2-7) days. We observed independent factors related to PICU admission, including CRP ≥ 50 (mg/L) (OR 2.52, 95% CI 1.39-4.56, p = 0.002), albumin ≤ 30 (g/L) (OR 3.18, 95% CI 1.63-6.02, p = 0.001), absolute lymphocyte count ≤ 2 (× 109/L) (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.29-3.71, p = 0.004), ferritin ≥ 300 (ng/mL) (OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.38-4.01), p = 0.002), and LVEF < 60 (%) (OR 2.48, 95% CI 1.28-4.78, p = 0.007). Shock developed in 140 (35.8%) patients, especially for those decreased absolute lymphocyte ≤ 2 (× 109/L) (OR 2.48, 95% CI 1.10-5.61, p = 0.029), albumin ≤ 30 (g/L) (OR 2.53, 95% CI 1.22-5.24, p = 0.013), or LVEF < 60 (%) (OR 2.24, 95% CI 1.12-4.51, p = 0.022). In conclusion, our study emphasized that absolute lymphocyte count, serum albumin, CRP, and LVEF were independent predictors for MIS-C severity. Further well-designed investigations are required to validate their efficacy in predicting MIS-C severe cases, especially compared to other parameters. As MIS-C is a new entity and severe courses may progress aggressively, identifying high-risk patients optimizes clinicians' follow-up and management to improve disease outcomes.

Psychological distress mediates the association between COVID-19-related discrimination and subsequent PTSD symptom severity in healthcare workers: a two-year follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: Past research has suggested a cross-sectional association between COVID-19-related discrimination and PTSD symptom severity. However, no cohort study has examined the longitudinal association that better supports causal interpretation. Also, even if such an association genuinely exists, the specific pathway remains unclear. METHODS: We conducted a two-year follow-up study, obtaining data from healthcare workers in a hospital setting. We first evaluated how COVID-19-related discrimination in 2021 was associated with subsequent PTSD symptom severity in 2023. Thereafter, we conducted causal mediation analysis to examine how this association was mediated by psychological distress in 2022, accounting for exposure-mediator interaction. Missing data were handled using random forest imputation. RESULTS: A total of 660 hospital staff were included. The fully adjusted model showed greater PTSD symptom severity in individuals who experienced any COVID-19-related discrimination compared with those without such experiences (ß, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.04-0.90). Regarding each type of discrimination, perceived discrimination was associated with greater PTSD symptom severity (ß, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.08-0.96), whereas verbal discrimination did not reach statistical significance. Psychological distress mediated 28.1%-38.8% of the observed associations. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19-related discrimination is associated with subsequent PTSD symptom severity in healthcare workers. Psychological distress may serve as an important mediator, underscoring the potential need for interventions targeting this factor.

Evaluation and comparison of one-step real-time PCR and one-step RT-LAMP methods for detection of SARS-CoV-2.

BACKGROUND: There is an increasing disease trend for SARS-COV-2, so need a quick and affordable diagnostic method. It should be highly accurate and save costs compared to other methods. The purpose of this research is to achieve these goals. METHODS: This study analyzed 342 samples using TaqMan One-Step RT-qPCR and fast One-Step RT-LAMP (Reverse Transcriptase Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification). The One-Step LAMP assay was conducted to assess the sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: The research reported positive samples using two different methods. In the RT-LAMP method, saliva had 92 positive samples (26.9%) and 250 negative samples (73.09%) and nasopharynx had 94 positive samples (27.4%) and 248 negative samples (72.51%). In the RT-qPCR method, saliva had 86 positive samples (25.1%) and 256 negative samples (74.8%) and nasopharynx had 93 positive samples (27.1%) and 249 negative samples (72.8%). The agreement between the two tests in saliva and nasopharynx samples was 93% and 94% respectively, based on Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ) (P < 0.001). The rate of sensitivity in this technique was reported at a dilution of 1 × 101 and 100% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results of the study the One-Step LAMP assay has multiple advantages. These include simplicity, cost-effectiveness, high sensitivity, and specificity. The One-Step LAMP assay shows promise as a diagnostic tool. It can help manage disease outbreaks, ensure prompt treatment, and safeguard public health by providing rapid, easy-to-use testing.

High prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and low prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in cats recently exposed to human cases.

BACKGROUND: The primary objective of this cross-sectional study, conducted in Québec and Bristish Columbia (Canada) between February 2021 and January 2022, was to measure the prevalence of viral RNA in oronasal and rectal swabs and serum antibodies to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) amongst cats living in households with at least one confirmed human case. Secondary objectives included a description of potential risk factors for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and an estimation of the association between the presence of viral RNA in swabs as well as SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and clinical signs. Oronasal and rectal swabs and sera were collected from 55 cats from 40 households at most 15 days after a human case confirmation, and at up to two follow-up visits. A RT-qPCR assay and an ELISA were used to detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA in swabs and serum SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies, respectively. Prevalence and 95% Bayesian credibility intervals (BCI) were calculated, and associations were evaluated using prevalence ratio and 95% BCI obtained from Bayesian mixed log-binomial models. RESULTS: Nine (0.16; 95% BCI = 0.08-0.28) and 38 (0.69; 95% BCI = 0.56-0.80) cats had at least one positive RT-qPCR and at least one positive serological test result, respectively. No risk factor was associated with the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 serum antibodies. The prevalence of clinical signs suggestive of COVID-19 in cats, mainly sneezing, was 2.12 (95% BCI = 1.03-3.98) times higher amongst cats with detectable viral RNA compared to those without. CONCLUSIONS: We showed that cats develop antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 when exposed to recent human cases, but detection of viral RNA on swabs is rare, even when sampling occurs soon after confirmation of a human case. Moreover, cats with detectable levels of virus showed clinical signs more often than cats without signs, which can be useful for the management of such cases.

A mathematical model of mobility-related infection and vaccination in an epidemiological case.

In this study, we established a system of differential equations with piecewise constant arguments to explain the impact of epidemiological transmission between different locations. Our main goal is to look into the need for vaccines as well as the necessity of the lockdown period. We proved that keeping social distance was necessary during the pandemic spread to stop transmissions between different locations and that re-vaccinations, including screening tests, were crucial to avoid reinfections. Using the Routh-Hurwitz Criterion, we examined the model's local stability and demonstrated that the system could experience Stationary and Neimark-Sacker bifurcations depending on certain circumstances.

Modeling a SEIVRS dynamic behavior with transportation-related transmissionEstablishing a system of two urban as differential equations with piecewise constant argumentsStability analysis of disease-free and co-existing equilibrium pointsAnalyzing bifurcation types around the disease-free and co-existing equilibrium points.Illustrating numerical scenarios that were applied during the pandemic event.

Nanosponges-Road Less Explored Changing Drug Delivery Approach: An Explicative Review.

Nanotechnology exhibits a wide range of applications in the domain of disease therapy, diagnosis, biological detection, and environmental safeguards. The cross-linked polymeric nanosponges (NSs) are a nanoscale drug carrier system with a 3D porous structure and high entrapment efficacy. NSs up to the fourth generation are currently accessible and can serve as a delivery system for both hydrophilic and hydrophobic drugs. The delivery system exhibits superiority over alternative methods due to its ability to achieve controlled and targeted drug delivery. The colloidal structure of NSs facilitates the encapsulation of a wide range of agents such as proteins and peptides, enzymes, antineoplastic drugs, volatile oil, vaccines, DNA, etc. NSs efficiently overcome the challenges associated with drug toxicity and poor aqueous solubility. NS formulations have been explored for various applications like gaseous encapsulation, enzyme immobilization, antifungal therapy, poison absorbent, water purification, etc. This review provides a comprehensive analysis regarding methods of synthesis, distinct polymeric NSs, mechanism of drug release, factors affecting NS development, applications, and patents filed in the field of NSs. Herein, the recently developed NS formulations, their potential in cancer therapy, and current progressions of NS for SARS-CoV-2 management are also deliberated with special attention, focusing on the significant challenges and future directions.

Increased alcohol consumption during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has significantly impacted health, mental well-being, and societal functioning, particularly for individuals with psychiatric conditions and substance use disorders. Recent evidence highlights a concerning increase in alcohol consumption during the pandemic, with a study spanning 2015-2020 indicating heightened usage, especially among young and middle-aged adults, for relaxation and tension relief. Additionally, addressing challenges exacerbated by the pandemic, another study underscored persistent barriers to healthcare access, resulting in increased alcohol and tobacco use rates and limited healthcare options. These findings shed light on the unique vulnerabilities exposed by the pandemic, emphasizing the need to investigate further its impact on alcohol consumption in diverse non-urban American communities. AIM: To investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on alcohol abuse using socioeconomic and medical parameters in diverse non-urban community in America. METHODS: Based on a cross-sectional analysis of 416 participants the United States in 2021, the study utilized The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition criteria to categorize alcohol consumption levels. Participants aged 21 years and above were surveyed through an online platform due to COVID-19 challenges. The survey was conducted from January 14 to January 31, 2022, recruiting participants via social media and ensuring anonymity. Informed consent was secured, emphasizing the voluntary nature of participation, and participants could only take the survey once. RESULTS: Out of 416 survey respondents, 396 met eligibility criteria, with 62.9% reporting increased alcohol consumption during COVID-19. Males (68.8%) and ages 21-29 years (34.6%) predominated. Low alcohol consumption decreased by 2.8% (P = 0.237), moderate by 21.4% (P < 0.001), and heavy increased by 14.9% (P < 0.001). Alcohol abuse rose by 6.5% (P = 0.0439), with a 7% increase in self-identified alcohol abusers/alcoholics. Seeking treatment during COVID-19 rose by 6.9%. Easier alcohol access (76.0%) was reported, while 80.7% found it harder to access medical care for alcohol-related issues. These findings highlight the pandemic's impact on alcohol consumption and healthcare access, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions during public health crises. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated alcoholism and abuse, with increased heavy consumption (P < 0.001) and abuse (P = 0.0439). Access to medical programs for addressing alcohol abuse declined, highlighting the need for targeted intervention.

Digestive and breast cancer patients managed during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic: Short and middle term outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The first wave of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in Spain lasted from middle March to the end of June 2020. Spanish population was subjected to lockdown periods and scheduled surgeries were discontinued or reduced during variable periods. In our centre, we managed patients previously and newly diagnosed with cancer. We established a strategy based on limiting perioperative social contacts, preoperative screening (symptoms and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction) and creating separated in-hospital COVID-19-free pathways for non-infected patients. We also adopted some practice modifications (surgery in different facilities, changes in staff and guidelines, using continuously changing personal protective equipment…), that supposed new inconveniences. AIM: To analyse cancer patients with a decision for surgery managed during the first wave, focalizing on outcomes and pandemic-related modifications. METHODS: We prospectively included adults with a confirmed diagnosis of colorectal, oesophago-gastric, liver-pancreatic or breast cancer with a decision for surgery, regardless of whether they ultimately underwent surgery. We analysed short-term outcomes [30-d postoperative morbimortality and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection] and outcomes after 3 years (adjuvant therapies, oncological events, death, SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination). We also investigated modifications to usual practice. RESULTS: From 96 included patients, seven didn't receive treatment that period and four never (3 due to COVID-19). Operated patients: 28 colon and 21 rectal cancers; laparoscopy 53.6%/90.0%, mortality 3.57%/0%, major complications 7.04%/25.00%, anastomotic leaks 0%/5.00%, 3-years disease-free survival (DFS) 82.14%/52.4% and overall survival (OS) 78.57%/76.2%. Six liver metastases and six pancreatic cancers: no mortality, one major complication, three grade A/B liver failures, one bile leak; 3-year DFS 0%/33.3% and OS 50.0%/33.3% (liver metastases/pancreatic carcinoma). 5 gastric and 2 oesophageal tumours: mortality 0%/50%, major complications 0%/100%, anastomotic leaks 0%/100%, 3-year DFS and OS 66.67% (gastric carcinoma) and 0% (oesophagus). Twenty breast cancer without deaths/major complications; 3-year OS 100% and DFS 85%. Nobody contracted SARS-CoV-2 postoperatively. COVID-19 pandemic-related changes: 78.2% treated in alternative buildings, 43.8% waited more than 4 weeks, two additional colostomies and fewer laparoscopies. CONCLUSION: Some patients lost curative-intent surgery due to COVID-19 pandemic. Despite practice modifications and 43.8% delays higher than 4 weeks, surgery was resumed with minimal changes without impacting outcomes. Clean pathways are essential to continue surgery safely.

COVID-19 Infection and ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Lessons in Disease Management During a Pandemic.

The emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, causing the COVID-19 pandemic, has profoundly impacted global health, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. This paper presents a case study highlighting the heightened risk of severe cardiovascular complications following COVID-19 infection. A 61-year-old male with hyperlipidemia was discharged after COVID-19 pneumonia treatment and experienced a severe ST-elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) within a day of discharge. A retrospective chart review, supplemented by a literature review, revealed a pattern of increased severity in STEMI cases associated with COVID-19, particularly in patients with pre-existing cardiovascular comorbidities. SARS-CoV-2 induces a prothrombotic state, which causes endothelial dysfunction and systemic inflammation, potentially precipitating thrombotic events. Managing concurrent COVID-19 and STEMI poses unique challenges, emphasizing the critical role of timely intervention, such as percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), in improving patient outcomes. Despite advancements, uncertainty persists regarding optimal thromboembolism prophylaxis post COVID-19, necessitating ongoing research and meticulous clinical management. While COVID-19 infection rates have declined since the pandemic, this case report hopes to emphasize the need for continued awareness in recognizing the potential thrombotic risks of COVID-19 infection and underscore the need for further investigation into cardiovascular risk as new viral strains develop in the future.

Long-term follow-up of kidney transplant recipients admitted to a tertiary care transplant center with SARS-CoV-2.

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplant recipients (KTR) are at risk of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) disease and mortality after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. We predicted that hospitalization for COVID-19 and subsequent admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) would yield worse outcomes in KTRs. AIM: To investigate outcomes among KTRs hospitalized at our high-volume transplant center either on the general hospital floor or the ICU. METHODS: We retrospectively describe all adult KTRs who were hospitalized at our center with their first SARS-CoV-2 infection between 04/2020 and 04/2022 and had at least 12 months follow-up (unless they experienced graft failure or death). The cohort was stratified by ICU admission. Outcomes of interest included risk factors for ICU admission and mortality, length of stay (LOS), respiratory symptoms at admission, all-cause graft failure at the last follow-up, and death related to COVID-19. RESULTS: 96 KTRs were hospitalized for SARS-COV-2 infection. 21 (22%) required ICU admission. The ICU group had longer hospital LOS (21.8 vs 8.6 days, P < 0.001) and were more likely to experience graft failure (81% vs 31%, P < 0.001). Of those admitted to the ICU, 76% had death at last-follow up, and 71% had death related to COVID-19. Risk factors for ICU admission included male sex (aHR: 3.11, 95%CI: 1.04-9.34; P = 0.04). Risk factors for all-cause mortality and COVID-19-related mortality included ICU admission and advanced age at SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. Mortality was highest within a month of COVID-19 diagnosis, with the ICU group having increased risk of all-cause (aHR: 11.2, 95%CI: 5.11-24.5; P < 0.001) and COVID-19-related mortality (aHR: 27.2, 95%CI: 8.69-84.9; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: ICU admission conferred an increased risk of mortality, graft failure, and longer LOS. One-fifth of those hospitalized died of COVID-19, reflecting the impact of COVID-19-related morbidity and mortality among KTRs.

Harnessing immunity: Immunomodulatory therapies in COVID-19.

An overly exuberant immune response, characterized by a cytokine storm and uncontrolled inflammation, has been identified as a significant driver of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases. Consequently, deciphering the intricacies of immune dysregulation in COVID-19 is imperative to identify specific targets for intervention and modulation. With these delicate dynamics in mind, immunomodulatory therapies have emerged as a promising avenue for mitigating the challenges posed by COVID-19. Precision in manipulating immune pathways presents an opportunity to alter the host response, optimizing antiviral defenses while curbing deleterious inflammation. This review article comprehensively analyzes immunomodulatory interventions in managing COVID-19. We explore diverse approaches to mitigating the hyperactive immune response and its impact, from corticosteroids and non-steroidal drugs to targeted biologics, including anti-viral drugs, cytokine inhibitors, JAK inhibitors, convalescent plasma, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, cell-based therapies (i.e., CAR T, etc.). By summarizing the current evidence, we aim to provide a clear roadmap for clinicians and researchers navigating the complex landscape of immunomodulation in COVID-19 treatment.

Combined prevention and treatment measures are essential to control nosocomial infections during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 is a highly contagious positive-sense, single-stranded RNA virus that has rapidly spread worldwide. As of December 17, 2023, 772838745 confirmed cases including 6988679 deaths have been reported globally. This virus primarily spreads through droplets, airborne transmission, and direct contact. Hospitals harbor a substantial number of confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients and asymptomatic carriers, accompanied by high population density and a larger susceptible population. These factors serve as potential triggers for nosocomial infections, posing a threat during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nosocomial infections occur to varying degrees across different countries worldwide, emphasizing the urgent need for a practical approach to prevent and control the intra-hospital spread of COVID-19. This study primarily concentrated on a novel strategy combining preventive measures with treatment for combating COVID-19 nosocomial infections. It suggests preventive methods, such as vaccination, disinfection, and training of heathcare personnel to curb viral infections. Additionally, it explored therapeutic strategies targeting cellular inflammatory factors and certain new medications for COVID-19 patients. These methods hold promise in rapidly and effectively preventing and controlling nosocomial infections during the COVID-19 pandemic and provide a reliable reference for adopting preventive measures in the future pandemic.

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on routine childhood vaccinations.

Routine pediatric vaccination is one of the most effective public health inter-ventions for the control of a number of fatal diseases. However, during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, routine pediatric vaccination rates were severely affected by disruptions of health services and vaccine confidence issues. Governments and the United Nations have taken measures to re-establish routine pediatric vaccination, while additional efforts are needed to catch up and develop plans to ensure routine vaccination services for the future pandemics.

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Remdesivir for the Treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019.

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by a novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, has accounted for more than 1 000 000 deaths in the United States alone. In May 2020, the Food and Drug Administration issued an Emergency Use Authorization to allow the investigational use of intravenous remdesivir for the treatment of suspected or confirmed COVID-19 in hospitalized children and adults. Several other agents, such as hydroxychloroquine, dexamethasone, and tocilizumab have been investigated as potential treatment options; however, dexamethasone is currently the only agent that has been proven to reduce mortality in patients who require supplemental oxygen. The purpose of this study was to determine if initiation of remdesivir treatment in patients who presented with early symptoms of COVID-19 (defined as symptom onset < 7 days) had a significant impact on in-patient all-cause mortality compared to initiation of remdesivir treatment in patients who presented with symptom onset of at least 7 days. Methods: This ethics-committee-approved, retrospective, multicenter, double-arm study was conducted across 10 facilities in the HCA Healthcare West Florida Division. Adult inpatients age 18 and older with confirmed COVID-19 and administered intravenous remdesivir from May 1, 2020, to July 31, 2020, were included. Exclusion criteria included patients less than 18 years of age, the concomitant use of hydroxychloroquine or tocilizumab for any indication, or an estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 30 milliliters per minute. The primary outcome of this study was in-patient all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included total length of stay, time to discharge, oxygen requirements, and number of ventilator days. Results: A total of 217 patients from facilities in the HCA Healthcare West Florida Division were evaluated for inclusion. The primary outcome of all-cause mortality occurred in 34.9% of patients with symptom onset of fewer than 7 days versus 31.0% of patients with symptom onset of at least 7 days (P = .57). There were no statistical differences found among the secondary outcomes. Conclusion: Time since symptom onset did not result in a statistically significant difference in all-cause mortality in patients who received intravenous remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19.

Ischemic Colitis in a Middle-Aged Man With COVID-19: Case Report and Review of Literature.

Introduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was a pandemic that began in 2019 and continues to have morbid and deadly consequences throughout the world. During the beginning of the pandemic, many considered older adults and immunocompromised younger adults to be the only populations at risk for the severe consequences of COVID-19. Throughout the pandemic, this was proven wrong with several case reports and studies showing that relatively younger adults can also suffer serious consequences from this perplexing virus. Case Presentation: We report a rare case of ischemic colitis in a 42-year-old obese man who presented to the emergency department with quintessential COVID-19 symptoms. During his hospital course, he developed not only respiratory failure but also ischemic colitis, although he had no past medical history of any coagulopathy and was never on any pressors. Conclusion: As more case reports are being published, it has become evident that COVID-19 has the ability to cause serious extrapulmonary consequences due to an imposed state of hypercoagulability, and younger adults are at risk of facing these consequences, especially if they are obese. Thus, it is imperative that younger adults seek out the COVID-19 vaccine when available to them not only to protect those most vulnerable around them but also to protect themselves from these complications.