Temporal trends and prognostic impact of reperfusion modalities in Tunisian patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: A 20-year analysis.

INTRODUCTION: With the advent of reperfusion therapies, management of patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has witnessed significant changes during the last decades. AIM: We sought to analyze temporal trends in reperfusion modalities and their prognostic impact over a 20-year period in patients presenting with STEMI the Monastir region (Tunisia). METHODS: Patients from Monastir region presenting for STEMI were included in a 20-year (1998-2017) single center registry. Reperfusion modalities, early and long-term outcomes were studied according to five four-year periods. RESULTS: Out of 1734 patients with STEMI, 1370 (79%) were male and mean age was 60.3 ± 12.7 years. From 1998 to 2017, primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) use significantly increased from 12.5% to 48.3% while fibrinolysis use significantly decreased from 47.6% to 31.7% (p<0.001 for both). Reperfusion delays for either fibrinolysis or primary PCI significantly decreased during the study period. In-hospital mortality significantly decreased from 13.7% during Period 1 (1998-2001) to 5.4% during Period 5 (2014-2017), (p=0.03). Long-term mortality rate (mean follow-up 49.4 ± 30.7 months) significantly decreased from 25.3% to 13% (p<0.001). In multivariate analysis, age, female gender, anemia on-presentation, akinesia/dyskinesia of the infarcted area and use of plain old balloon angioplasty were independent predictors of death at long-term follow-up whereas primary PCI use and preinfaction angina were predictors of long-term survival. CONCLUSIONS: In this long-term follow-up study of Tunisian patients presenting for STEMI, reperfusion delays decreased concomitantly to an increase in primary PCI use. In-hospital and long-term mortality rates significantly decreased from 1998 to 2017.

Prevalence of influenza and other acute respiratory illnesses in patients with acute myocardial infarction in Bangladesh: A cross-sectional study.

Background and Aims: Several studies imply that influenza and other respiratory illnesses could lead to acute myocardial infarction (AMI), but data from low-income countries are scarce. We investigated the prevalence of recent respiratory illnesses and confirmed influenza in AMI patients, while also exploring their relationship with infarction severity as defined by ST-elevation MI (STEMI) or high troponin levels. Methods: This cross-sectional study, held at a Dhaka tertiary hospital from May 2017 to October 2018, involved AMI inpatients. The study examined self-reported clinical respiratory illnesses (CRI) in the week before AMI onset and confirmed influenza using baseline real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Results: Of 744 patients, 11.3% reported a recent CRI, most prominently during the 2017 influenza season (35.7%). qRT-PCR testing found evidence of influenza in 1.5% of 546 patients, with all positives among STEMI cases. Frequencies of CRI were higher in patients with STEMI and in those with high troponin levels, although these relationships were not statistically significant after adjusting for other variables. The risk of STEMI was significantly greater during influenza seasons in the unadjusted analysis (relative risk: 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.18), however, this relationship was not significant in the adjusted analysis (adjusted relative risk: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.91-1.16). Conclusion: In Bangladesh, many AMI patients had a recent respiratory illness history, with some showing evidence of influenza. However, these illnesses showed no significant relationship to AMI severity. Further research is needed to understand these relationships better and to investigate the potential benefits of infection control measures and influenza vaccinations in reducing AMI incidence.

COVID-19 Infection and ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Lessons in Disease Management During a Pandemic.

The emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, causing the COVID-19 pandemic, has profoundly impacted global health, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. This paper presents a case study highlighting the heightened risk of severe cardiovascular complications following COVID-19 infection. A 61-year-old male with hyperlipidemia was discharged after COVID-19 pneumonia treatment and experienced a severe ST-elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) within a day of discharge. A retrospective chart review, supplemented by a literature review, revealed a pattern of increased severity in STEMI cases associated with COVID-19, particularly in patients with pre-existing cardiovascular comorbidities. SARS-CoV-2 induces a prothrombotic state, which causes endothelial dysfunction and systemic inflammation, potentially precipitating thrombotic events. Managing concurrent COVID-19 and STEMI poses unique challenges, emphasizing the critical role of timely intervention, such as percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), in improving patient outcomes. Despite advancements, uncertainty persists regarding optimal thromboembolism prophylaxis post COVID-19, necessitating ongoing research and meticulous clinical management. While COVID-19 infection rates have declined since the pandemic, this case report hopes to emphasize the need for continued awareness in recognizing the potential thrombotic risks of COVID-19 infection and underscore the need for further investigation into cardiovascular risk as new viral strains develop in the future.

Sonothrombolysis in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction with electrocardiographic no-reflow after percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Approximately 50% of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) suffer from microvascular no-reflow. Pre- and post-PCI sonothrombolysis has shown to decrease infarct size and improve left ventricular (LV) systolic function in STEMI patients receiving urgent PCI. The aim of this study was to investigate whether post-PCI sonothrombolysis alone in STEMI patients with persistent ST-elevation could reduce no-reflow and infarct size. METHODS: STEMI patients with symptoms <12 hours, who had persistent ST-elevation (≤70% ST-resolution) after primary PCI. were randomized to sonothrombolysis or control. The primary endpoint was summed (Σ) ST-elevation 60 minutes after study intervention. Secondary endpoints included infarct size, myocardial perfusion score, LV ejection fraction on cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging at two months follow up, and clinical outcome at six months follow up. RESULTS: 67 STEMI patients with persistent ST-elevation after PCI were randomized (49 left anterior descending, 18 right coronary/left circumflex artery). No difference was observed in Σ ST-elevation 60 minutes after study intervention (mean difference: 0.6mm, 95% CI: -1.1 - 2.2, p=0.50). Complete ST-resolution occurred in 14 (40%) of patients treated with sonothrombolysis compared to six (19%) of controls (p=0.16). Myocardial perfusion score index (1.5 ±0.3 vs. 1.5 ±0.3, p=0.93), infarct size (18.0±10% vs. 16.8±11%; p=0.29) or LV ejection fraction on CMR (46±8% vs.47±11% in the control group; p=0.86) were comparable. Incidence of all-cause death, acute coronary syndrome and hospital admission for heart failure at six months follow up was similar between the groups (sonothrombolysis: 2, control: 5). CONCLUSION: In STEMI patients with persistent ST-elevation after PCI, post-PCI sonothrombolysis did not result in more ST-resolution or smaller infarct size compared to control subjects. The incidence of the combined clinical endpoints was remarkably low in this high-risk patient population.

Culprit-Only Revascularization, Single-Setting Complete Revascularization, and Staged Complete Revascularization in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Insights From a Mixed Treatment Comparison Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

BACKGROUND: Complete revascularization improves cardiovascular outcomes compared with culprit-only revascularization in patients with acute myocardial infarction ([MI]; ST-segment-elevation MI or non-ST-segment-elevation MI) and multivessel coronary artery disease. However, the timing of complete revascularization (single-setting versus staged revascularization) is uncertain. The aim was to compare the outcomes of single-setting complete, staged complete, and culprit vessel-only revascularization in patients with acute MI and multivessel disease. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and clinicaltrials.gov databases were searched for randomized controlled trials that compared 3 revascularization strategies. RESULTS: From 16 randomized controlled trials that randomized 11 876 patients with acute MI and multivessel disease, both single-setting complete and staged complete revascularization reduced primary outcome (cardiovascular mortality/MI; odds ratio [OR], 0.52 [95% CI, 0.41-0.65]; OR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.62-0.88]), composite of all-cause mortality/MI (OR, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.40-0.67]; OR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.67-0.91]), major adverse cardiovascular event (OR, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.32-0.56]; OR, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.47-0.82]), MI (OR, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.26-0.57]; OR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.59-0.90]), and repeat revascularization (OR, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.18-0.47]; OR, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.30-0.71]) compared with culprit-only revascularization. Single-setting complete revascularization reduced cardiovascular mortality/MI (OR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.55-0.91]), major adverse cardiovascular event (OR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.50-0.91]), and all-cause mortality/MI driven by a lower risk of MI (OR, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.36-0.77]) compared with staged complete revascularization. Single-setting complete revascularization ranked number 1, followed by staged complete revascularization (number 2) and culprit-only revascularization (number 3) for all outcomes. The results were largely consistent in subgroup analysis comparing ST-segment-elevation MI versus non-ST-segment-elevation MI cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Single-setting complete revascularization may offer the greatest reductions in cardiovascular events in patients with acute MI and multivessel disease. A large-scale randomized trial of single-setting complete versus staged complete revascularization is warranted to evaluate the optimal timing of complete revascularization.

Pulmonary Embolism Presenting as ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Report of Two Cases.

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is often underrecognized due to its ability to mimic other conditions; however, ultrasound can provide diagnostic clues to aid in the diagnosis of PE. We describe two patients who presented with symptoms suggestive of cardiac ischemia and had electrocardiograms (EKGs) indicative of anteroseptal myocardial infarction. In both cases, cardiac point-of-care ultrasonography showed signs of large pulmonary emboli, which were then confirmed on computed tomography angiography of the chest. Both patients underwent successful aspiration thrombectomy with rapid resolution of cardiac dysfunction. Point-of-care ultrasonography should be used as an adjunct in patients presenting with anterior ischemia on EKG to evaluate for signs of PE.

"Very" Very Late Stent Thrombosis: A Detailed Look at Two Cases.

Although percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has radically transformed the scope of treating coronary artery disease with stenting, stent thrombosis (STh) remains a feared complication. Very late STh, a rare complication after PCI, refers to STh occurring greater than one year after post-stent implantation. An even rarer phenomenon, "very" very late stent thrombosis (VVLST), is described in the literature as STh occurring more than five years post-stent implantation. To our knowledge, there are only 10 case reports and one case series describing VVLST. We discuss two additional complex clinical cases of VVLST presenting as ST-elevation myocardial infarction. We highlight epidemiology, pathophysiology, presentation, diagnostic methods, treatment approach, associated complications, and the need for more extensive future work to minimize the risk of VVLST.

Early coronary angiography in NSTEMI: a regional Victorian perspective.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines highlight a paucity of evidence guiding optimal timing for non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) in high-risk and non-high-risk cases. AIM: We assessed long-term major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in NSTEMI patients undergoing early (<24 h) versus delayed (>24 h) coronary angiography at 6 years. Secondary end-points included all-cause mortality and cumulative MACE outcomes. METHODS: Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes were assessed among 355 patients presenting to a tertiary regional hospital between 2017 and 2018. Cox proportional hazard models were generated for MACE and all-cause mortality outcomes, adjusting for the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score, patient demographics, biomarkers and comorbidities. RESULTS: Two hundred and seventy patients were included; 147 (54.4%) and 123 (45.6%) underwent early and delayed coronary angiography respectively. Median time to coronary angiography was 13.3 and 45.4 h respectively. At 6 years, 103 patients (38.1%) experienced MACE; 41 in the early group and 62 in the delayed group (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.23; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.50-3.31). After multivariable adjustment, the delayed group had higher rates of MACE (HR = 1.79; 95% CI = 1.19-2.70), all-cause mortality (HR = 2.76; 95% CI = 1.36-5.63) and cumulative MACE (incidence rate ratio = 1.54; 95% CI = 1.12-2.11). Subgroup analysis of MACE outcomes in rural and weekend NSTEMI presentations was not significant between early and delayed coronary angiography (HR = 1.49; 95% CI = 0.83-2.62). CONCLUSION: Higher MACE rates in the delayed intervention group suggest further investigation is needed. Randomised control trials would be well suited to assess the role of early invasive intervention across all NSTEMI risk groups.

The Ramus Intermedius: A Bridge to Survival in the Setting of Triple-Vessel Total Occlusion.

Coronary artery disease continues to remain the leading cause of mortality worldwide. Coronary blood supply is provided through the right and left main coronary arteries. The left main coronary artery (LMCA) in turn gives rise to the left anterior descending (LAD) and left circumflex (LCX) arteries. In some cases, LMCA may trifurcate into the ramus intermedius (RI) in addition to the LAD and LCX arteries. Atherosclerotic plaque formation and rupture with subsequent clot formation and occlusion of coronary arteries are the underlying mechanisms of myocardial infarction. Though the clinical implications of the presence of ramus intermedius (RI) are controversial some data suggest that the RI is associated with an increased risk of atherosclerotic plaque formation in the LMCA and the proximal LAD. Conversely, it has been proposed that the RI provides an additional collateral source of blood supply to the myocardium and may potentially contribute to improved survival. Case reports tout the benefits of RI, specifically in the setting of multivessel coronary artery occlusions. Whether it increases the risk of atherosclerotic plaque formation or whether it is protective has yet to be determined. We present a case of a 58-year-old male who presented with acute coronary syndrome and cardiogenic shock due to total ostial occlusion of LAD. The patient had also chronic total occlusions of the right coronary artery and LCX but a patent RI, which was the only source of blood supply to the myocardium and practically determined the patient's survival. Additionally, we performed a literature review to identify similar cases, to support RI's potentially protective role in enhancing survival.

Evaluating Cardiovascular Risks: The Platelet Lymphocyte Ratio and the Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio As High-Risk Heart Score Predictors in Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI) and Unstable Angina Patients.

Introduction Acute coronary syndromes (ACS), encompassing non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and unstable angina (UA), present significant challenges in risk assessment and management, particularly in resource-constrained environments like India. The burden of cardiovascular diseases in such regions necessitates cost-effective and readily accessible tools for risk stratification. Previous research has emphasized the role of inflammatory markers in coronary artery disease (CAD), prompting investigations into simple and affordable biomarkers for risk assessment. Platelet lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR) have emerged as potential biomarkers for thrombotic activity in cardiac illnesses, offering simplicity, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness in risk assessment making them particularly valuable in resource-poor settings like India, where advanced diagnostic tools may be limited. Objective This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of PLR and NLR as predictors of high-risk HEART (history, ECG, age, risk factors, and troponin) scores in patients with NSTEMI and UA. Methods A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted at the Saveetha Medical College and Hospitals in Chennai, India, from March 2021 to September 2022. The study included 288 adults diagnosed with NSTEMI or UA, aged 18 years and above. The inclusion criteria comprised patients with confirmed diagnoses of NSTEMI or UA based on clinical symptoms, electrocardiographic findings, and cardiac biomarker elevation. The exclusion criteria encompassed patients with active infections, acute traumatic injuries, end-stage renal disease, malignant neoplasms, and ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). In addition to the HEART score, PLR, and NLR were computed to assess the prognosis of patients admitted to the Saveetha Medical College and Hospitals. Results The statistical analysis revealed significant correlations between PLR, NLR, and HEART score risk categories. The Pearson's correlation coefficient indicated strong associations between PLR/NLR values and HEART score risk groups, suggesting their potential as predictive markers for adverse clinical outcomes. Additionally, analysis of variance (ANOVA) demonstrated significant differences in PLR/NLR values across different HEART score risk categories, further highlighting their relevance in risk stratification. The effect sizes for these correlations were moderate to large, indicating clinically meaningful associations between PLR/NLR and cardiovascular risk. Conclusion In cases of NSTEMI and UA, PLR and NLR show potential as simple and inexpensive indicators of high-risk patients. By leveraging these inexpensive biomarkers, healthcare providers can enhance risk assessment and prognostication in patients presenting with ACS, facilitating timely interventions and tailored management strategies.

Incidence and predictors of new-onset atrial fibrillation in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: A single-center study.

Background and Aims: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia that occurs following ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and can significantly impact clinical outcomes. We investigated the incidence and predictors of AF following STEMI in patients, as well as its association with major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study, including all STEMI patients who presented under code 247 to Tehran Heart Center between 2016 and 2020 and completed a 1-year follow-up. Patients were divided into two groups based on the development of AF during follow-up, and their baseline and clinical characteristics were compared. We used multivariable regression models to identify predictors of MACCE. Results: Out of 3647 STEMI patients, 84 (2.3%) developed new-onset AF (NOAF). Patients with AF were significantly older and had lower levels of total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglyceride, and hemoglobin, but higher levels of fasting blood sugar and creatinine. AF patients were also more likely to have a history of hypertension, chronic kidney disease (CKD), congestive heart failure, and cerebrovascular accidents. The multivariable logistic regression model identified the CHA2DS2-VASc score and CKD as independent predictors of NOAF following primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Furthermore, the incidence of MACCE was higher in the AF group, and AF independently predicted MACCE with a hazard ratio of 2.766. Conclusion: The CHA2DS2-VASc score and the presence of CKD can serve as useful predictors of NOAF among patients with STEMI. Early detection and appropriate management are crucial to improve outcomes.

Relationship between angiogenesis biomarker endocan and apolipoproteins in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Aim: In the current study, serum levels of endocan in patients attended with ST-elevation myocardial infarction, as well as the possible correlation with apolipoprotein-A1 (APO-A1) and APO-B were investigated. Materials & methods: In 80 men, endocan, cTnI, APO-A1, and APO-B levels were measured. Finally, the correlation of endocan with APO-A1, APO-B, and APO-B/ APO-A1 ratio was assessed. Results: Significant changes in APO-A1, APO-B, endocan levels, and APO-B/APO-A1 ratio were found in acute myocardial infarction cases compared with the control arm (p < 0.05). In addition, our finding showed a significant correlation between APO-B and endocan levels, but not APO-A. Conclusion: High endocan level is an independent indicator of endothelial dysfunction and ischemic cardiovascular conditions, which could be related to APO-B.

[Box: see text].

Preoperative intra-aortic balloon pump in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing urgent cardiac bypass surgery.

BACKGROUND: In patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), either with or without cardiogenic shock, mechanical circulatory support with an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) is not associated with lower mortality. However, in STEMI patients undergoing urgent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), preoperative insertion of an IABP has been suggested to reduce mortality. In this study, the effect of preoperative IABP use on mortality in STEMI patients undergoing urgent CABG was investigated. METHODS: All consecutive STEMI patients undergoing urgent CABG in a single centre between 2000 and 2018 were studied. The primary outcome, 30-day mortality, was compared between patients with and without a preoperative IABP. Subgroup analysis and multivariable analysis using a propensity score and inverse probability treatment weighting were performed to adjust for potential confounders. RESULTS: A total of 246 patients were included, of whom 171 (69.5%) received a preoperative IABP (pIABP group) and 75 (30.5%) did not (non-pIABP group). In the pIABP group, more patients suffered from cardiogenic shock, persistent ischaemia and reduced left ventricular function. Unadjusted 30-day mortality was comparable between the pIABP and the non-pIABP group (13.3% vs 12.3%, p = 0.82). However, after correction for confounders and inverse probability treatment weighting preoperative IABP was associated with reduced 30-day mortality (relative risk 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.30-0.88). CONCLUSION: In patients with STEMI undergoing urgent CABG, preoperative insertion of an IABP is associated with reduced mortality.

Development and validation of a machine learning-based readmission risk prediction model for non-ST elevation myocardial infarction patients after percutaneous coronary intervention.

To investigate the factors that influence readmissions in patients with acute non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) by using multiple machine learning (ML) methods to establish a predictive model. In this study, 1576 NSTEMI patients who were hospitalized at the Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College were selected as the research subjects. They were divided into two groups: the readmitted group and the non-readmitted group. The division was based on whether the patients experienced complications or another incident of myocardial infarction within one year after undergoing PCI. Common variables selected by univariate and multivariate logistic regression, LASSO regression, and random forest were used as independent influencing factors for NSTEMI patients' readmissions after PCI. Six different ML models were constructed using these common variables. The area under the ROC curve, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were used to evaluate the performance of the six ML models. Finally, the optimal model was selected, and a nomogram was created to visually represent its clinical effectiveness. Three different methods were used to select seven representative common variables. These variables were then utilized to construct six different ML models, which were subsequently compared. The findings indicated that the LR model exhibited the most optimal performance in terms of AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. The outcome, admission mode (walking and non-walking), communication ability, CRP, TC, HDL, and LDL were identified as independent predicators of readmissions in NSTEMI patients after PCI. The prediction model constructed by the LR algorithm was the best. The established column graph model established proved to be effective in identifying high-risk groups with high accuracy and differentiation. It holds a specific predictive value for the occurrence of readmissions after direct PCI in NSTEMI patients.

Acute Coronary Syndrome: Treatment Strategies and Outcomes in Patients Admitted to a Tertiary Care Hospital in Palestine.

Background: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is the leading cause of death worldwide despite advances in treatment and prevention measures. This study aimed to explore ACS treatment strategies (ischemia-guided vs early invasive) and risk factors among patients diagnosed with ACS in a tertiary care hospital in Palestine and to evaluate related outcomes regarding future events and standard clinical guidelines. Methods: This retrospective cohort study reviewed patient data from a Palestinian medical hospital. The study included 255 patients ≥ 18 years who were hospitalized between January 2021 and December 2021 and diagnosed with ACS. The data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS). Results: 71% of the participants were males. The mean age was 59.59±11.56 years. Smoking, diabetes, and hypertension were the most common risk factors. Unstable angina (UA) was the most prevalent ACS type, accounting for 43.1% (110) of cases, whereas NSTEMI accounted for 39.2% (100) and STEMI accounted for 17.6% (45) of cases. An ischemic-guided strategy approach was used in 71% (181) of the patients. Upon discharge, the most prescribed medication classes were antiplatelets (97.6%), statins (87.1%), PPIs (72.5%), and antihypertensives (71.8%). Treatment strategies were selected according to the clinical guidelines for most ACS types. Conclusion: ACS management in Palestine continues to evolve to overcome barriers, decrease patient mortality, and decrease hospital stay. UA and NSTEMI were the most common ACS diagnoses at admission, and the ischemic strategy was the most common modality. The findings of this study call for an increased awareness of CVD risk factors, resource availability, and adherence to clinical guidelines to improve patient outcomes and community health.

Microvascular recovery with ultrasound in myocardial infarction post-PCI trial.

PURPOSE: Persistent microvascular obstruction (MVO) after successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has been well-described. MVO predicts lack of recovery of left ventricular function and increased mortality. Sonothrombolysis utilizing diagnostic ultrasound induced cavitation of commercially available microbubble contrast has been effective at reducing infarct size and improving left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) when performed both pre- and post-PCI. However, the effectiveness of post-PCI sonothrombolysis alone after successful PCI has not been demonstrated. METHODS: A prospective randomized controlled trial was performed in 50 consecutive consenting patients with anterior STEMI who underwent a continuous microbubble infusion immediately following successful PCI. Intermittent high mechanical index (MI) impulses were applied only in the sonthrombolysis group. Delayed enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed at 48 h and again at 6-8 weeks to assess for differences in infarct size, LVEF, and MVO. RESULTS: There were no differences between groups in age, gender, and cardiovascular risk factors. Significant (> 2 segments) MVO following successful PCI was observed in 66% of patients. Although sonothrombolysis reduced the extent of MVO acutely, there were no differences in infarct size, LVEF, or extent of MVO by MRI at 48 h. Twenty-eight patients returned for a follow up MRI at 6-8 weeks. LVEF improved only in the sonothrombolysis group (∆LVEF 7.81 ± 4.57% with sonothrombolysis vs. 1.77 ± 7.02% for low MI only, p = .011). CONCLUSION: Post-PCI sonothrombolysis had minimal effect on reducing myocardial infarct size but improved left ventricular systolic function in patients with acute anterior wall STEMI.

Long-Term Prognostic Value of Infarct Transmurality Determined by Contrast-Enhanced Cardiac Magnetic Resonance after ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

The long-term prognostic significance of maximal infarct transmurality evaluated by contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance (CE-CMR) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients has yet to be determined. This study aimed to see if maximal infarct transmurality has any additional long-term prognostic value over other CE-CMR predictors in STEMI patients, such as microvascular obstruction (MVO) and intramyocardial hemorrhage (IMH). The study included 112 consecutive patients who underwent CE-CMR after STEMI to assess established parameters of myocardial injury as well as the maximal infarct transmurality. The primary clinical endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), which included all-cause death, non-fatal reinfarction, and new heart failure hospitalization. The MACE occurred in 10 patients over a median follow-up of 7.9 years (IQR, 5.8 to 9.2 years) (2 deaths, 3 nonfatal MI, and 5 heart failure hospitalization). Patients with MACE had significantly higher rates of transmural extent of infarction, infarct size >5.4 percent, MVO, and IMH compared to patients without MACE. In stepwise multivariable Cox regression analysis, the transmural extent of infarction defined as 75 percent or more of infarct transmurality was an independent predictor of the MACE after correction for MVO and IMH (hazard ratio 8.7, 95% confidence intervals [CIs] 1.1-71; p=0.043). In revascularized STEMI patients, post-infarction CE-CMR-based maximal infarct transmurality is an independent long-term prognosticator. Adding maximal infarct transmurality to CE-CMR parameters like MVO and IMH could thus identify patients at high risk of long-term adverse outcomes in STEMI.

Effects of Serum Potassium on Mortality in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

INTRODUCTION: Disturbances in potassium levels can induce ventricular arrhythmias and heighten mortality in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). This study evaluates the influence of sK levels on seven-day mortality and incidence of ventricular arrhythmias in STEMI patients to further improve clinical guidelines and outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective, propensity-matched study analyzed approximately 250,000 acute STEMI patients from 55 major academic medical centers/healthcare organizations (HCOs) in the US Collaborative Network of the TriNetX database. The sK levels recorded on the day of STEMI diagnosis were categorized into four cohorts: sK ≤ 3.4 (hypokalemia), 3.5 ≤ sK ≤ 4.5 (normal-control), 4.6 ≤ sK ≤ 5.0 (high-normal), and sK ≥ 5.1 (hyperkalemia). Patient cohorts were propensity-matched using linear and logistic regression for demographics. Outcomes of seven-day mortality, ventricular tachycardia (VT), and ventricular fibrillation (VF) were compared between these cohorts and the control group. RESULTS: The analysis showed hypokalemia was linked to significantly higher seven-day mortality (7.2% vs. 4.3%; RR 1.69; p<0.001), and increased rates of VT and VF. Similarly, hyperkalemia was associated with elevated mortality (12.7% vs. 4.6%; RR 2.76; p<0.001), VT, and VF rates. High-normal sK levels showed increased mortality (7.4% vs. 4.7%; RR 1.58; p<0.001), but unchanged VT or VF rates compared to the normal sK group. CONCLUSION: This comprehensive study highlights the correlation of sK levels with death in STEMI patients, revealing a nearly doubled risk of mortality with hypokalemia and almost triples with hyperkalemia. More notably, the mortality for STEMIs is higher for high-normal vs normal sK values. Additionally, hypokalemia and hyperkalemia were found to significantly elevate VT and VF risks.

Evaluation of the ODISEA APP for improving a STEMI regional network.

BACKGROUND: The use of technological innovations in ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) care networks has been shown to be effective in improving information flow and coordination, and thus reducing the time to reperfusion. We developed a smartphone application called ODISEA to improve our STEMI care network and evaluated the results of its use. METHOD: Quasi-experimental study that compared the outcomes of STEMI suspected patients with an alert and indication for transfer to a cath lab during a previous period and a period in which the ODISEA APP was used. The main objective was to examine differences in reperfusion time and the proportion of patients with a final diagnosis other than acute coronary syndrome. RESULTS: A total of 699 patients were included (415 before and 284 during the ODISEA-APP period). No differences were observed in patient characteristics, infarct type, or acute complications. We observed a reduction in the time from diagnostic ECG to wire crossing with the use of the ODISEA APP (117 vs 102 min, p < 0.001) and a reduction in the percentage of patients with a final diagnosis other than acute coronary syndrome (17.1% vs 9.5%, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: The use of the ODISEA APP in the management of patients with suspected STEMI may be useful for reducing the time from diagnostic ECG to wire crossing and the percentage of patients with a final diagnosis other than acute coronary syndrome.

Safety and efficacy of platelet-derived mitochondrial transplantation in ischaemic heart disease.

BACKGROUND: Acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains a globally significant health challenge in spite of improvement in management strategy. Being aware that mitochondrial dysfunction plays a crucial role in ischaemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) modulation, empirical evidence suggests functional mitochondrial transplantation strikes as a reliable therapeutic approach for patients with acute myocardial infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a prospective, triple-blinded, parallel-group, blocked randomised clinical trial to investigate the therapeutic effects and clinical outcomes of platelet-derived mitochondrial transplantation in 30 patients with acute STEMI, such that the 15 subjects in the control group were given standard of care treatment, whereas the subjects in the intervention group received autologous platelet-derived mitochondria through the intracoronary injection. We observed that within 40 days, the intervention group had a slightly greater improvement in the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) compared to the control group and experienced a significant enhancement in the exercise capacity (p < 0.001). Moreover, major adverse cardiac events (MACE), arrhythmia, fever, and tachycardia were compared between the groups and lack of significant difference marks the safety of mitochondrial transplantation (p > 0.05). Furthermore, the two groups were not significantly distinct as regards the average length of stay for a hospitalisation (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: We suggest platelet-derived mitochondrial transplantation appears as a beneficial and highly promising therapeutic option for patients of ischaemic heart disease (IHD); however, we are aware that further in-depth studies with larger sample sizes along with longer follow-up periods are necessary for validating the clinical implications of our findings.