Comparison between anterior and posterior vaginal approach in apical prolapse repair in relation to anatomical structures and points of fixation to the sacrospinous ligament in fresh postmenopausal female cadavers.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The high prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in women requires attention and constant review of treatment options. Sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) for apical prolapse has benefits, high efficacy, and low cost. Our objective is to compare anterior and posterior vaginal approach in SSLF in relation to anatomical structures and to correlate them with body mass index (BMI). METHODS: Sacrospinous ligament fixation was performed in fresh female cadavers via anterior and posterior vaginal approaches, using the CAPIO®SLIM device (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA). The distances from the point of fixation to the pudendal artery, pudendal nerve, and inferior gluteal artery were measured. RESULTS: We evaluated 11 cadavers with a mean age of 70.1 ± 9.9 years and mean BMI 22.4 ± 4.6 kg/m2. The mean distance from the posterior SSLF to the ischial spine, pudendal artery, pudendal nerve, and inferior gluteal artery were 21.18 ± 2.22 mm, 17.9 ± 7.3 mm, 19.2 ± 6.8 mm, and 18.9 ± 6.9 mm respectively. The same measurements relative to the anterior SSLF were 19.7 ± 2.7 mm, 18.6 ± 6.7 mm, 19.2 ± 6.9 mm, and 18.3 ± 6.7 mm. Statistical analysis showed no difference between the distances in the two approaches. The distances from the fixation point to the pudendal artery and nerve were directly proportional to the BMI. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in the measurements obtained in the anterior and posterior vaginal approaches. A direct correlation between BMI and the distances to the pudendal artery and pudendal nerve was found.

Colpopexia al ligamento sacroespinoso con CapioTM; cirugía, resultados y evolución de pacientes / Sacroespinous ligament colpopexy with CapioTM; surgery patient outcomes and evolution

Introducción: El prolapso genital femenino altera significativamente la calidad de vida de la mujer. El prolapso apical es el segundo más frecuente después del defecto de pared anterior y la colposuspensión al ligamento sacroespinoso es una de las técnicas quirúrgicas descritas para su tratamiento. Objetivos: Determinar la factibilidad de la corrección del prolapso apical en pacientes sometidas a la colposuspensión al ligamento sacroespinoso, utilizando el dispositivo de captura de sutura CapioTM. Materiales y métodos: Análisis retrospectivo de pacientes intervenidas desde junio de 2015 a junio de 2016, en la unidad de piso pélvico del Hospital Luis Tisné Brousse, basándose principalmente en la evaluación del punto C del Prolpase Organ Pelvic Quatinfication (POP-Q). Resultados: Se intervinieron 15 pacientes, con edad promedio de 60,7 ± 6,8 años. Todas presentaron prolapso genital estadio III o IV. El seguimiento se realizó entre 3 y 13 meses después de la cirugía. Ninguna presentó complicaciones graves durante ni después de la cirugía y sólo una paciente recidivó. Conclusiones: La colposuspensión al ligamento sacroespinoso con CapioTM, es una técnica factible, segura y eficaz para el tratamiento del prolapso apical, sin embargo, es necesario mayor tiempo de seguimiento y estudios comparativos con otras técnicas de colposuspensión.

Introduction: Female genital prolapse significantly alter the quality of life of women. The apical prolapse is the second common defect after anterior wall and the colposuspension to sacrospinous ligament is one of the described surgical techniques for its treatment. Objective: To determine the feasibility of apical prolapse correction in patients undergoing sacrospinous colposuspension using the suture capture device CapioTM. Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing this surgery from June 2015 to June 2016, including an objective assessment focused mainly in the C point of Prolapse Organ Pelvic Quatinfication (POP-Q) and a subjective evaluation of the patient. Results: 15 patients, of which only 11 were able to complete follow-up, were included. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 60.7 ± 6.8 years, and all were classified as prolapse stages III or IV. The evaluation was performed in average 6.75 ± 3.39 months after surgery, with a minimum of 3 and a maximum of 13 months. No patient had several complications during or after surgery and only one recurred. Conclusions: The colposuspension to sacrospinous ligament with CapioTM is a safe and effective alternative for the treatment of apical genital prolapse. However, a longer follow-up study is needed, in addition to comparative studies with other colposuspension techniques.

Malla para la reparación del prolapso vaginal apical y anterior: resultados subjetivos y complicaciones / Vaginal mesh for repair of apical and anterior vaginal prolapse: subjective outcomes and complications

Resumen Antecedentes: la aplicación de mallas con fijación al ligamento sacroespinoso para corregir el prolapso apical de órganos pélvicos tiene tasas de éxito objetivo de 92%, con 2-12% de eventos adversos. Objetivo: evaluar los resultados clínicos posteriores a la aplicación de la malla UpholdTM en pacientes con prolapso apical, con o sin útero. Materiales y métodos: estudio retrospectivo y descriptivo efectuado en pacientes atendidas en la Clínica de Urología Ginecológica del Instituto Nacionalo de Perinatología Isidro Espinosa de los Reyes entre los meses de noviembre de 2013 a marzo de 2017 con prolapso de órganos pélvicos de la cúpula a quienes se aplicaron mallas que se fijaron al ligamento sacroespinoso. A las pacientes con incontinencia urinaria de esfuerzo se les colocó una cinta mediouretral. Resultados: se estudiaron 22 pacientes de las que 72% (n = 16) tenían histerectomía previa. El estadio del prolapso de órganos pélvicos fue II en 18% (n = 4), III en 41% (n = 9) y IV en 41% (n = 9). El compartimento anterior se encontró afectado en 41% (n = 9) y en 59% (n = 13) el apical. El 54% (n = 12) de las pacientes tenía incontinencia urinaria de esfuerzo. A 9% (n = 2) de las pacientes solo se les colocó la malla UpholdTM, a 45% (n = 10) se les practicó una cirugía concomitante para corrección del prolapso de órganos pélvicos (colpoplastia posterior [n = 5], colpoperineoplastia [ n = 4] y 1 culdoplastia) y para incontinencia urinaria de esfuerzo a 68% (n = 15) se les colocó una cinta mediouretral. El 9% (n = 2) tuvieron lesión vesical, 40% (n = 9) retención urinaria, 4.5% (n = 1) exposición y 4.5% (n = 1) extrusión. El éxito subjetivo y objetivo fue de 100%. Conclusiones: la colocación de la malla Uphold con fines de corrección del prolapso apical tiene buenos resultados, con mínimos efectos adversos. El procedimiento antiincontinencia concomitante incrementa la retención urinaria.

Abstract Introduction: The use of mesh with fixation to sacoespinous ligament (SEL) for correction of pelvic organ prolapse has a success rate of 92% and adverse events are reported in 2-12%. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical results after the application of Uphold mesh in women with apical prolapse with or without uterus. Methods: A retrospective and descriptive study, 22 patients with E ≥ II voult pelvic organ prolapse who underwent vault fixation or hysteropexy to SEL and mediourethral tape (CMU) in those with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) from November-2013 to March-2017. Results: 72.7% (n = 16) had previous hysterectomy. The pelvic organ prolapse stage was grade II in 18% (n = 4), III in 41% (n = 9) and IV in 41% (n = 9), the anterior compartment was affected in 40.9% and 59% (n = 13) for apical. 54.5% (n = 12) had SUI. In 9% (n = 2) were placed exclusively Uphold, concomitant surgery was performed for correction of posterior compartment pelvic organ prolapse in 45% (n=10) and at 68% (n = 15) CMU was placed. 9% (n = 2) had bladder injury, 40% (n = 9) urinary retention of patients with CMU application, 4.5% (n = 1) exposure and 4.5% (n = 1) extrusion. Subjective and objective success was 100%. Conclusions: The placement of Uphold has successful results in the correction of apical prolapse. The concomitant anti-incontinence procedure increases the presence of urinary retention.