Comparative study of antifungal susceptibility testing methods for clinical Candida albicans isolates.

PURPOSE: Candida albicans is the second most common cause of candidemia in Malaysia. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution method is the gold standard for determining its minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC); however, it is laborious and time-consuming. This study was conducted to evaluate the usefulness of alternative methods, namely Sensititre YeastOne (SYO), VITEK 2 system, and E-test for determining the MIC of clinical C. albicans isolates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The susceptibilities of 95 C. albicans isolates were compared between SYO, VITEK 2 system, and E-test with CLSI broth microdilution method. The categorical agreement (CA), essential agreement (EA), very major errors (VME), major errors (ME) and minor errors (MiE) were calculated. RESULTS: Our finding showed the CA varied for SYO from 96.8% to 100%, while the EA ranged from 91.6% to 100%. The SYO method showed 1.1% of VME and ME, and up to 3.2% of MiE. Next, the CA and EA ranges for the VITEK 2 system were 97.8%-100% and 23.2%-100%, respectively. In the VITEK 2 technique, 1.1% of VME were found. For the E-test, the CA varied from 83.2% to 100% while the EA ranged from 64.2% to 98.9%. The E-test method showed 1.1% of VME and up to 16.8% of MiE. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, SYO and VITEK 2 (except flucytosine) could be potential alternatives to the CLSI broth microdilution method in determining the MIC of C. albicans.

Candida auris - Comparison of sensititre YeastOne and Vitek 2 AST systems for antifungal susceptibility testing - A single centre experience.

INTRODUCTION: Candida auris is emerging as an important cause of candidemia and deep seated candidal infection. We compared the susceptibility results of bloodstream Candida auris isolates by Vitek 2 with Sensititre YeastOne (SYO) method. METHODS: Forty-seven C. auris blood stream isolates were simultaneously tested for AFST by Vitek 2 and SYO. RESULTS: All strains were resistant to Fluconazole. 25.5% isolates showed pan-azole resistance. In comparison with SYO, lower MICs for voriconazole were noted with Vitek 2 (VME rate 76.1%). All strains were sensitive to anidulafungin and micafungin by SYO. For micafungin, Vitek 2 demonstrated higher MICs and an ME rate of 23.5%. Susceptibility interpretation of caspofungin by SYO was challenged by development of 'Eagle effect' resulting in sensitivity of 28.2%. We studied the evolution of caspofungin 'Eagle effect' with SYO by serial hourly MIC readings and noted that paradoxical growth commenced at 21 hrs of incubation. Compared to SYO, Vitek 2 showed higher resistance rate to Amphotericin B with ME rate of 25.6%. CONCLUSION: Laboratories using commercial AFST systems for Candida auris need to be aware of the possibility of ME and VME for amphotericin B and voriconazole respectively with Vitek 2 and 'Eagle effect' for caspofungin with SYO.

Commercial Methods for Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Saprophytic Molds: Can They Be Used to Detect Resistance?

Commercial tests are often employed in clinical microbiology laboratories for antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi. Method-dependent epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs) have been defined in order to detect non-wild-type (NWT) isolates harboring resistance mechanisms. We reviewed the literature in order to find studies where commercial methods were used to evaluate for in vitro susceptibility of filamentous fungi and assess their ability to detect NWT isolates according to the available ECVs. Data were found for the gradient concentration strips Etest and MIC Test Strips (MTS), broth microdilution Sensititre YeastOne (SYO), Micronaut-AM and the agar dilution VIPcheck assays. Applying itraconazole, voriconazole and posaconazole Etest ECVs for A. fumigatus, Etest was able to detect 90.3% (84/93), 61.2% (90/147) and 86% (31/36) of isolates with known cyp51A mutations, respectively. Moreover, Etest also was able to detect 3/3 fks mutants using caspofungin ECVs and 2/3 micafungin mutant isolates. Applying the voriconazole and posaconazole SYO ECVs, 57.7% (67/116) and 100% (47/47) of mutants with known cyp51A substitutions were classified as NWT, respectively. VIPcheck detected 90.3% (159/176), 80.1% (141/176) and 66% (141/176)of mutants via itraconazole, voriconazole and posaconazole, respectively, whereas Micronaut-AM detected 88% (22/25). In conclusion, Etest posaconazole and itraconazole, as well as micafungin and caspofungin ECVs, detected A. fumigatus mutants. On the other hand, while the posaconazole SYO ECV was able to detect cyp51A mutants, similar data were not observed with the SYO voriconazole ECV.

Comparative assessment of Sensititre YeastOne and Micronaut-AM EUCAST for antifungal susceptibility testing in candidaemia isolates.

PURPOSE: Antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST) is essential to ensure appropriate antifungal therapy in candidaemia. This study compared two commercial colorimetric broth microdilution tests: Sensititre YeastOne (SYO; Thermo Scientific) and Micronaut-AM EUCAST AFST (M-AM; Bruker) for the AFST of Candida spp. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 74 yeast strains, including C. albicans (n = 40) and non-albicans Candida species (NACS) (n = 34), were obtained from blood cultures of patients admitted to a tertiary care hospital in Belgium from 2017 to 2022. AFST by SYO and by M-AM were performed according to the manufacturers' protocols and interpreted using CLSI and EUCAST guidelines, respectively. Essential and categorical agreements (EA and CA), very major, major and minor discrepancies were calculated for amphotericin B, echinocandins and azoles considering SYO as the reference method. RESULTS: In total, 441 and 392 isolate-antifungal results were evaluable for EA and CA, respectively. SYO and M-AM, showed a high level of concordance for C. albicans strains, with an EA and CA ≥90 % for all tested antifungals. However, we noted significant discordances for NACS, the lowest EA were observed with micafungin (50 %) and voriconazole (58.8 %). These discrepancies were likely due to differences in the raw MIC values obtained by the two methods and the different interpretation breakpoints used by CLSI and EUCAST. CONCLUSION: Our study showed excellent agreement between SYO and M-AM for AFST of C. albicans, while the equivalency was lower for NACS. AFST method should be carefully selected, considering the results might impact the choice of antifungals for non-albicans candidaemia.

Evaluation of three commercial methods of susceptibility testing for ceftolozane/tazobactam against carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa / Evaluación de 3 métodos comerciales de determinación de sensibilidad de ceftolozano/tazobactam frente a Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistente a las carbapenemas

Introduction: Ceftolozane/tazobactam has shown excellent activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, but this drug is not always included in commercial panels. The aim of the study was to evaluate the performance of 2 gradient strips (BioMérieux and Liofilchem) and a commercial microdilution panel (Sensititre, EURGNCOL panel) using this combination against carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates. Methods: Three commercial methods were tested with 41 metallo-beta-lactamase-producing and 59 non-carbapenemase-producing P. aeruginosa isolates. Broth microdilution was used as reference. Results: All carbapenemase-producing isolates and only one non-producing isolate were resistant to this antibiotic. Both essential agreement and bias were outside the acceptance intervals since MIC values were higher than reference values for all three methods. The Kappa index indicated poor or weak agreement. Changes in clinical categories were observed in 3 isolates. Conclusions: The three methods yielded poor agreement with the reference. Despite the differences in MIC values, fewer than 3% involved category changes.(AU)

Introducción: La combinación ceftolozano/tazobactam ha mostrado una actividad excelente frente a Pseudomonas aeruginosa, pero este fármaco no siempre se incluye en los paneles comerciales. El objetivo de este estudio es evaluar el rendimiento de 2 tiras de gradiente (BioMérieux® y Liofilchem®) y un panel de microdilución comercial (Sensititre®, panel EURGNCOL) utilizando esta combinación frente a aislados de P. aeruginosa resistente a los carbapenémicos. Métodos: Se probaron 3 métodos comerciales con 41 aislados productores de metalobetalactamasas y 59 aislados no productores de carbapenemasas de P. aeruginosa. La microdilución de caldo se utilizó como referencia. Resultados: Todos los aislados productores de carbapenemasas y solo un aislado no productor fueron resistentes a este antibiótico. Tanto la concordancia esencial como el sesgo se encontraron fuera de los intervalos de aceptación, dado que los valores CMI eran superiores que los valores de referencia para los 3 métodos. El índice de Kappa indicó una concordancia pobre o débil. Se observaron cambios en las categorías clínicas en 3 aislados. Conclusiones: Los 3 métodos presentaron una baja concordancia con la microdilución de referencia. A pesar de las diferencias en los valores MIC, menos del 3% implicaron cambios de categoría.(AU)

Evaluating amikacin minimum inhibitory concentration in trailing growth for Mycobacterium avium complex.

BACKGROUND: Amikacin is a first-line drug that must be evaluated when performing an antimycobacterial susceptibility test (AST) for Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC). However, the presence of sporadic trailing growth in MAC makes determining the precise point for reading its minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) challenging. METHODS: Susceptibility was re-tested for 134 MAC clinical isolates using the Sensititre SLOMYCOI panel, the rrs gene was sequenced, and amikacin exposure history was investigated. The MIC50, MIC90, and the epidemiological cut-off value (ECOFF) were calculated using the EUCAST method. RESULTS: After re-testing and ignoring trailing growth, of the 22 M. intracellulare isolates originally classified as resistant to amikacin according to the CLSI guideline, 10 strains were reclassified as intermediate and four as susceptible. Similarly, from the seven resistant M. avium strains, one was reclassified as intermediate and four as susceptible. No rrs gene mutations were detected in any isolates, including resistant strains. When ignoring trailing growth, the calculated MIC50, MIC90, and ECOFF values closely aligned with the EUCAST MIC distribution. CONCLUSION: To maintain the current CLSI breakpoint, trailing growth should be ignored when reading the amikacin MIC of MAC. To read the MIC at complete bacterial inhibition, the CLSI breakpoint needs to be raised.

Rapid automated antifungal susceptibility testing system for yeasts based on growth characteristics.

Fungal pathogens are a major threat to public health, as they are becoming increasingly common and resistant to treatment, with only four classes of antifungal medicines currently available and few candidates in the clinical development pipeline. Most fungal pathogens lack rapid and sensitive diagnostic techniques, and those that exist are not widely available or affordable. In this study, we introduce a novel automated antifungal susceptibility testing system, Droplet 48, which detects the fluorescence of microdilution wells in real time and fits growth characteristics using fluorescence intensity over time. We concluded that all reportable ranges of Droplet 48 were appropriate for clinical fungal isolates in China. Reproducibility within ±2 two-fold dilutions was 100%. Considering the Sensititre YeastOne Colorimetric Broth method as a comparator method, eight antifungal agents (fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, caspofungin, micafungin, anidulafungin, amphotericin B, and 5-flucytosine) showed an essential agreement of >90%, except for posaconazole (86.62%). Category agreement of four antifungal agents (fluconazole, caspofungin, micafungin, and anidulafungin) was >90%, except for voriconazole (87.93% agreement). Two Candida albicans isolates and anidulafungin showed a major discrepancy (MD) (2.60%), and no other MD or very MD agents were found. Therefore, Droplet 48 can be considered as an optional method that is more automated and can obtain results and interpretations faster than previous methods. However, the optimization of the detection performance of posaconazole and voriconazole and promotion of Droplet 48 in clinical microbiology laboratories still require further research involving more clinical isolates in the future.

Overestimation of Amphotericin B Resistance in Candida auris with Sensititre YeastOne Antifungal Susceptibility Testing: a Need for Adjustment for Correct Interpretation.

Significant variation in minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) has been reported for amphotericin B (AMB) and C. auris, depending on the antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST) method. Although the Sensititre YeastOne (SYO) is widely used in routine laboratory testing, data regarding its performance for the AFST of C. auris are scarce. We tested AMB against 65 C. auris clinical isolates with the SYO and the reference methodology by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). The essential agreement (EA, ±1 dilution) between the two methods and the categorical agreement (CA) based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)'s tentative breakpoint of MIC ≥ 2 mg/L were determined. The SYO wild type upper limit value (WT-UL) was determined using the ECOFFinder. The modal (range) CLSI growth inhibitory MIC was lower than the SYO colorimetric MIC [1(0.25-1) versus 2(1-8) mg/L, respectively]). The CLSI-colorimetric SYO EA was 29% and the CA was 11% (89% major errors; MaE). MaE were reduced when the SYO WT-UL of 8 mg/L was used (0% MaE). Alternatively, the use of SYO growth inhibition endpoints of MIC-1 (75% growth inhibition) or MIC-2 (50% growth inhibition) resulted in 88% CA with 12% MaE and 97% CA with 3% MaE, respectively. In conclusion, SYO overestimated AMB resistance in C. auris isolates when colorimetric MICs, as per SYO instructions and the CDC breakpoint of 2 mg/L, were used. This can be improved either by using the method-specific WT-UL MIC of 8 mg/L for colorimetric MICs or by determining growth inhibition MIC endpoints, regardless of the color. IMPORTANCE Candida auris is an emerging and frequently multidrug-resistant fungal pathogen that accounts for life-threatening invasive infections and nosocomial outbreaks worldwide. Reliable AF is important for the choice of the optimal treatment. Commercial methods are frequently used without prior vigorous assessment. Resistance to AMB was over-reported with the commercial colorimetric method Sensititre YeastOne (SYO). SYO produced MICs that were 1 to 2 twofold dilutions higher than those of the reference CLSI method, resulting in 89% MaE. MaE were reduced using a SYO-specific colorimetric wild type upper limit MIC value of 8 mg/L (0%) or a 50% growth inhibition endpoint (3%).

Evaluation of three commercial methods of susceptibility testing for ceftolozane/tazobactam against carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

INTRODUCTION: Ceftolozane/tazobactam has shown excellent activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, but this drug is not always included in commercial panels. The aim of the study was to evaluate the performance of 2 gradient strips (BioMérieux and Liofilchem) and a commercial microdilution panel (Sensititre, EURGNCOL panel) using this combination against carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates. METHODS: Three commercial methods were tested with 41 metallo-beta-lactamase-producing and 59 non-carbapenemase-producing P. aeruginosa isolates. Broth microdilution was used as reference. RESULTS: All carbapenemase-producing isolates and only one non-producing isolate were resistant to this antibiotic. Both essential agreement and bias were outside the acceptance intervals since MIC values were higher than reference values for all three methods. The Kappa index indicated poor or weak agreement. Changes in clinical categories were observed in 3 isolates. CONCLUSIONS: The three methods yielded poor agreement with the reference. Despite the differences in MIC values, fewer than 3% involved category changes.

Multicenter Italian Study on "In Vitro Activities" of Isavuconazole, Voriconazole, Amphotericin B, and Caspofungin for Aspergillus Species: Comparison between SensititreTM YeastOneTM and MIC Test Strip.

In this study the activity of Isavuconazole, Voriconazole, Amphotericin B, and Caspofungin against 224 clinical isolates of Aspergillus spp. originating from seven Italian hospitals, was comparatively evaluated with two commercial antifungal susceptibility tests (AST): SensititreTM YeastOneTM (SYO) and MIC Test Strip. More attention was focused on Isavuconazole activity, given the new introduction of the drug in widely distributed antifungal susceptibilities methods in the clinical microbiology lab. The minimum inhibitory concentrations of antifungal drug that can inhibit the growth of pathogen by 90% (MIC90) for Isavuconazole detected by SYO were 0.5, 1, 0.25, and 2 µg/mL for Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus terreus, and Aspergillus niger, respectively, whilst they were 0.25, 0.25, 0.5, and 0.75 µg/mL by MIC Test Strip. Essential agreement between the two tested methods for Isavuconazole is 70% for all the species tested, 75.7% for A. fumigatus, 45.2% for A. flavus, 90.6% for A. terreus, and 40% for A. niger. Although the tested strains do not express any phenotypic resistance, MIC results were quite different if tested with microdilution broth or gradient agar method. This is the first Italian multicenter report on Isavuconazole MIC obtained employing the widely used SensititreTM Yeast OneTM (SYO) and MIC Test Strip on clinical isolates of Aspergillus.

Evaluation of the Sensititre YeastOne and Etest in Comparison with CLSI M38-A2 for Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Three Azoles, Amphotericin B, Caspofungin, and Anidulafungin, against Aspergillusfumigatus and Other Species, Using New Clinical Breakpoints and Epidemiological Cutoff Values.

Aspergillosis is an invasive fungal disease associated with high mortality. Antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST) is receiving increasing consideration for managing patients, as well as for surveilling emerging drug resistance, despite having time-consuming and technically complex reference methodologies. The Sensititre YeastOne (SYO) and Etest methods are widely utilized for yeasts but have not been extensively evaluated for Aspergillus isolates. We obtained Posaconazole (POS), Voriconazole (VCZ), Itraconazole (ITC), Amphotericin B (AMB), Caspofungin (CAS), and Anidulafungin (AND) minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for both the Etest (n = 330) and SYO (n = 339) methods for 106 sequenced clinical strains. For 84 A. fumigatus, we analyzed the performance of both commercial methods in comparison with the CLSI-AFST, using available cutoff values. An excellent correlation could be demonstrated for Etest-AMB and Etest-VCZ (p < 0.01). SYO-MICs of AMB, VCZ, and POS resulted in excellent essential agreement (>93%), and >80% for AMB, VCZ, and ITC Etest-MICs. High categoric agreement was found for AMB, ITC, and CAS Etest-MICs (>85%) and AMB SYO-MICs (>90%). The considerable number of major/very major errors found using Etest and SYO, possibly related to the proposed cutoffs and associated with the less time-consuming processes, support the need for the improvement of commercial methods for Aspergillus strains.

Evaluation of a custom Sensititre YeastOne plate for susceptibility testing of isavuconazole and other antifungals against clinically relevant yeast and mould species in three Australian diagnostic mycology laboratories.

This study aimed to validate the performance of the custom formulated Sensititre YeastOne One (SYO) microdilution plate which includes isavuconazole (AUSNMRC1) to perform susceptibility testing on clinically relevant yeast and mould species across three Australian reference laboratories. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) results were compared with the IVD approved SYO YO10 microdilution plate and isavuconazole gradient strips. A total of 127 isolates were tested on both the YO10 and AUSNMRC1 plates. The overall essential agreement (EA) and categorical agreement (CA) for the eight common drugs was 99.9% and 98.8%, respectively. The EA was 96.9% for the isavuconazole MICs obtained using the AUSNMRC1 plate and gradient strip. The MIC results for all nine antifungals on the AUSNMRC1 panel were highly reproducible for all quality control and reference strains and the overall EA and CA for 45 clinical strains tested across all three participating laboratories were >93% and 94.1%, respectively. These findings demonstrate the SYO AUSNMRC1 plate provides a commercial means to determine isavuconazole MICs by broth microdilution testing.

Comparison of ceftazidime-avibactam susceptibility testing methods against OXA-48-like carrying Klebsiella blood stream isolates.

Ceftazidime-avibactam exhibits good in vitro activity against carbapenem resistant Klebsiella carrying OXA-48-like enzymes. We tested two hundred unique carbapenem resistant Klebsiella blood stream isolates (71% with single OXA-48-like carbapenemases, including OXA-48, n = 62; OXA-232, n = 57; OXA-244, n = 17; OXA-181, n = 5) that were collected as part of a multicentre study against ceftazidime-avibactam using Etest (bioMérieux, Marcyl'Étoile, France), 10/4 µg disc (Thermo Fisher) and Sensititre Gram Negative EURGNCOL Plates (Lyophilized panels, Sensititre, Thermo Fisher) with the aim of comparing the performances of the Etest and disc to that of Sensititre. Ceftazidime-avibactam MIC50/90 was 2/>16 mg/L for the entire collection and was 2/4 mg/L for single OXA-48-like producers. Categorical and essential agreements between the Etest and Sensititre were 100% and 97%, respectively. Categorical agreement between the disc and Sensititre was 100%. Etest and 10/4 µg discs are suitable alternatives to Sensititre for ceftazidime-avibactam sensitivity testing for OXA-48-like producers.

Comparison of carbapenem minimum inhibitory concentrations of Oxacillin-48-like Klebsiella pneumoniae by Sensititre, Vitek 2, MicroScan, and Etest.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this laboratory-based study was to compare carbapenem MICs yielded by Sensititre, Vitek 2, MicroScan WalkAway plus and Etest for Oxacillin (OXA)-48-like Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates. METHODS: Analysis was performed for categorical agreement for ertapenem, meropenem, and imipenem, and the proportion of isolates with MICs ≤8µg/mL and the MIC50/MIC90 for meropenem and imipenem, from a convenience sample of 82 deduplicated blood culture OXA-48-like K. pneumoniae isolates. RESULTS: The proportion of isolates testing susceptible to ertapenem by Etest (19/82, 23.1%) differed from Sensititre/Vitek (0/82) and MicroScan (2/82, 2.4%) (p < 0.001 for all). For meropenem, the proportion of isolates susceptible by Etest (31/82, 37.8%) differed from Sensititre/Vitek (16/82, 19.5%) (p = 0.015). There was variation in the proportion of isolates that tested imipenem susceptible when comparing Sensititre (9/82, 11%) and Vitek (8/82, 9.8%) to MicroScan (27/82, 32.9%), p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively, Sensititre and Vitek to Etest (45/82, 54.9%), p < 0.001 for both, and MicroScan to Etest, p = 0.007. The proportion of isolates with meropenem MICs ≤8µg/mL with Sensititre and Vitek differed significantly from Etest, 58.5% and 85.4%, respectively, p < 0.001. A 2-fold difference between the Sensititre and Vitek meropenem and imipenem MIC at which ≥50% of isolates were inhibited compared to the MicroScan, and a 4-fold difference compared to Etest, was present. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial variability in carbapenem MICs for OXA-48-like carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales isolates by the four methods was demonstrated. Performance characteristics verification of MIC methods in use for the predominant carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales type is required by laboratories to optimize the accuracy of carbapenem reporting.

How Yeast Antifungal Resistance Gene Analysis Is Essential to Validate Antifungal Susceptibility Testing Systems.

Objectives: The antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST) of yeast pathogen alerts clinicians about the potential emergence of resistance. In this study, we compared two commercial microdilution AFST methods: Sensititre YeastOne read visually (YO) and MICRONAUT-AM read visually (MN) or spectrophotometrically (MNV), interpreted with Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing criteria, respectively. Methods: Overall, 97 strains from 19 yeast species were measured for nine antifungal drugs including a total of 873 observations. First, the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) was compared between YO and MNV, and between MNV and MN, either directly or by assigning them to five susceptibility categories. Those categories were based on the number of MIC dilutions around the breakpoint or epidemiological cut-off reference values (ECOFFs or ECVs). Second, YO and MNV methods were evaluated for their ability to detect the elevation of MICs due to mutation in antifungal resistance genes, thanks to pairs or triplets of isogenic strains isolated from a single patient along a treatment previously analyzed for antifungal resistance gene mutations. Reproducibility measurement was evaluated, thanks to three quality control (QC) strains. Results: YO and MNV direct MIC comparisons obtained a global agreement of 67%. Performing susceptibility category comparisons, only 22% and 49% of the MICs could be assigned to categories using breakpoints and ECOFFs/ECVs, respectively, and 40% could not be assigned due to the lack of criteria in both consortia. The YO and MN susceptibility categories gave accuracies as low as 50%, revealing the difficulty to implement this method of comparison. In contrast, using the antifungal resistance gene sequences as a gold standard, we demonstrated that both methods (YO and MN) were equally able to detect the acquisition of resistance in the Candida strains, even if MN showed a global lower MIC elevation than YO. Finally, no major differences in reproducibility were observed between the three AFST methods. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the valuable use of both commercial microdilution AFST methods to detect antifungal resistance due to point mutations in antifungal resistance genes. We highlighted the difficulty to conduct conclusive analyses without antifungal gene sequence data as a gold standard. Indeed, MIC comparisons taking into account the consortia criteria of interpretation remain difficult even after the effort of harmonization.

Utilidad del panel Sensititre YeastOne® para detectar especies de Candida resistentes a los antifúngicos / Usefulness of the Sensititre YeastOne® panel to detect Candida species resistant to antifungal drugs

Resumen Evaluamos las concordancias interlaboratorio, esencial y categórica entre el panel Sensititre YeastOne™ y los métodos de referencia correspondientes al M27 4.a ed. (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute [CLSI]) y al EDef 7.3.1 (European Committee on Antifungal Susceptibility Testing [EUCAST]). Estudiamos 67 cepas de Candida de distintas muestras clí nicas y un panel de 9 cepas resistentes a fluconazol y equinocandinas. El mayor porcentaje de concordancia interlaboratorio se observó con anfotericina B (96,8%) y el menor porcen taje con voriconazol (77,2%). La caspofungina mostró un 5,8% de discrepancias muy mayores con el método de referencia del CLSI. Con el del EUCAST, el itraconazol, el posaconazol y la anidulafungina mostraron porcentajes de discrepancias mayores: el 17,6, el 18,1 y el 19,6%, respectivamente. El panel Sensititre YeastOne™ es una alternativa confiable y fácil de usar, que permite detectar especies de Candida resistentes a los antifúngicos, con algunas limitaciones para las equinocandinas. Los resultados son equiparables a los de los métodos de referencia.

Abstract We evaluated the interlaboratory agreement, the essential agreement, and the cate- gorical agreement between the Sensititre YeastOne™ panel and the reference methods M27 4th Edition of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), and the EDef 7.3.1 of the Euro- pean Committee on Antifungal Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). We studied 67 Candida strains isolated from different clinical samples and 9 Candida strains with resistance to fluconazole and echinocandins. The highest percentage of interlaboratory agreement was observed with amp- hotericin B (96.8%), and the lowest percentage with voriconazole (77.2%). Caspofungin showed 5.8% of very major errors when compared with the CLSI reference method. For EUCAST, itraconazole, posaconazole, and anidulafungin showed high percentages of major errors: 17.6%, 18.1%, and 19.6%, respectively. Sensititre YeastOne™ is a reliable alternative, and easy to perform for detecting Candida species resistant to antifungal drugs, with some limitations for echinocandins. Results are comparable to those of the reference methods.

Comparative evaluation of Sensititre YeastOne and VITEK 2 against the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute M27-E4 reference broth microdilution method for the antifungal susceptibility testing of Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii.

The present study collected 280 isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans and 22 isolates of Cryptococcus gattii and evaluated the consistencies between Sensititre YeastOne (SYO), VITEK 2, and the reference broth microdilution (BMD) method for the antifungal susceptibility testing of fluconazole, voriconazole, and flucytosine. For amphotericin B, SYO was replaced with the BIO KONT amphotericin B microbroth dilution kit. The essential agreements (EAs) by SYO and VITEK 2 for C. neoformans var. grubii and C. neoformans var. neoformans were 98.15-99.63% and 88.89-100%, respectively, with fluconazole, voriconazole, and flucytosine. The EA for C. gattii VG â…  against fluconazole was 29.41% by VITEK 2, while the other EAs for C. gattii strains were 100% by SYO and VITEK 2. The categorical agreements (CAs) by SYO and VITEK 2 for C. neoformans and C. gattii were 94.12-100%, while VITEK 2 failed to distinguish 5/6 fluconazole-resistant non-wild-type C. neoformans var. grubii isolates; this finding confirmed the limitation of testing fluconazole against C. neoformans as documented in the manufacturer's package insert. The EAs for amphotericin B were 97.42-100% for C. neoformans and C. gattii, but the CAs were 17.65-60% by BIO KONT and VITEK 2. Thus, SYO can be used for susceptibility testing of C. neoformans and C. gattii against fluconazole, voriconazole, and flucytosine, and VITEK 2 can be used for susceptibility testing of C. neoformans against voriconazole and flucytosine. Further studies using amphotericin B-resistant isolates are required to assess the agreement between VITEK 2, BIO KONT, and BMD. LAY SUMMARY: Sensititre YeastOne showed a good agreement with the CLSI broth microdilution method for C. neoformans and C. gattii against voriconazole and flucytosine. The limitation regarding fluconazole testing against C. neoformans documented in VITEK 2 manufacturer's package insert was confirmed.

[Usefulness of the Sensititre YeastOne® panel to detect Candida species resistant to antifungal drugs]. / Utilidad del panel Sensititre YeastOne® para detectar especies de Candida resistentes a los antifúngicos.

We evaluated the interlaboratory agreement, the essential agreement, and the categorical agreement between the Sensititre YeastOneTM panel and the reference methods M27 4th Edition of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), and the EDef 7.3.1 of the European Committee on Antifungal Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). We studied 67 Candida strains isolated from different clinical samples and 9 Candida strains with resistance to fluconazole and echinocandins. The highest percentage of interlaboratory agreement was observed with amphotericin B (96.8%), and the lowest percentage with voriconazole (77.2%). Caspofungin showed 5.8% of very major errors when compared with the CLSI reference method. For EUCAST, itraconazole, posaconazole, and anidulafungin showed high percentages of major errors: 17.6%, 18.1%, and 19.6%, respectively. Sensititre YeastOneTM is a reliable alternative, and easy to perform for detecting Candida species resistant to antifungal drugs, with some limitations for echinocandins. Results are comparable to those of the reference methods.

Comparison of Etest and broth microdilution for evaluating the susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae to ceftaroline and of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa to ceftazidime/avibactam.

OBJECTIVES: Decreased susceptibility to ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) and ceftaroline (CPT) has been reported during antimicrobial resistance surveillance and therapy. Conventional laboratories are unable to provide timely susceptibility testing for CZA and CPT because these antimicrobial agents are not incorporated in automated susceptibility testing systems. METHODS: We evaluated Etest and the Sensititre broth microdilution (BMD) method for testing CZA against carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli and CPT against important Gram-positive cocci bloodstream isolates. Genotypes of carbapenemases in Enterobacterales were also determined using the Xpert® Carba-R assay. RESULTS: Etest showed ≥90% agreement with Sensititre BMD for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) (n = 187), carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli (CREC) (n = 28) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (n = 35); however, the very major error rate exceeded 3%. Agreement between Etest and Sensititre BMD was <90% for carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) (n = 81), methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) (n = 92) and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) (n = 170). Both agents remained potent with a high susceptibility rate by Sensititre BMD as follows: CZA against CRKP (95.0%), CREC (89.3%) and CRPA (84.5%); and CPT against MSSA (100.0%), MRSA (95.3%) and S. pneumoniae (94.3%). CZA was active against blaKPC-carrying CRKP (98.5% susceptible), and resistance in the majority of CZA-resistant Enterobacterales isolates (6 of 10 CRKP and 2 of 3 CREC) was due to the presence of a metallo-ß-lactamase gene. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that interpretation of susceptibility results obtained by Etest for both agents should be undertaken cautiously and remains challenging.

Comparison of Two Commercial Colorimetric Broth Microdilution Tests for Candida Susceptibility Testing: Sensititre YeastOne versus MICRONAUT-AM.

Two colorimetric broth microdilution antifungal susceptibility tests were compared, Sensititre YeastOne and MICRONAUT-AM for nine antifungal agents. One hundred clinical Candida isolates were tested, representing a realistic population for susceptibility testing in daily practice. The reproducibility characteristics were comparable. Only for fluconazole, caspofungin, 5-flucytosine and amphotericin B, an essential agreement of ≥90% could be demonstrated. Sensititre minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were systematically higher than MICRONAUT MICs for all antifungals, except for itraconazole. CLSI clinical breakpoints (CBPs) and epidemiological cut-off values (ECVs) were used for Sensititre MICs while for MICRONAUT the EUCAST CBPs and ECVs were used. Only fluconazole, micafungin, and amphotericin B had a categorical agreement of ≥90%. For fluconazole, micafungin, and amphotericin B the susceptibility proportions were comparable. Susceptibility proportion of posaconazole and voriconazole was higher using the MICRONAUT system. For itraconazole and anidulafungin, the susceptibility proportion was higher using Sensititre. It was not possible to determine the true MIC values or the correctness of a S/I/R result since both commercial systems were validated against a different reference method. These findings show that there is a significant variability in susceptibility pattern and consequently on use of antifungals in daily practice, depending on the choice of commercial system.