Magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients with polymyalgia rheumatica.

Objective: To describe the prevalence of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in patients with the clinical diagnosis of polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR). Materials and Methods: Sixteen consecutive patients with untreated PMR, meeting the American College of Rheumatology criteria, underwent MRI examinations of the shoulder(s), hip(s), or both, depending on clinical complaints. Six patients also underwent MRI of the spine. Results: We evaluated 24 shoulders, among which we identified subacromial-subdeltoid bursitis in 21 (87.5%), glenohumeral joint effusion in 17 (70.8%), and fluid distention of the long head of the biceps tendon sheath in 15 (62.5%). Peritendinitis and capsular edema were observed in 21 (87.5%) and 17 (70.8%) shoulders, respectively. We also evaluated 17 hips, identifying hip joint effusion in 12 (70.6%), trochanteric bursitis in 11 (64.7%), peritendinitis in 17 (100%), and capsular edema in 14 (82.4%). All six of the patients who underwent MRI of the spine were found to have interspinous bursitis. Conclusion: Subacromial-subdeltoid bursitis, glenohumeral joint effusion, and hip joint effusion are common findings in patients with PMR. In addition, such patients appear to be highly susceptible to peritendinitis and capsular edema. There is a need for case-control studies to validate our data and to determine the real impact that these findings have on the diagnosis of PMR by MRI.

Objetivo: Descrever os achados de ressonância magnética (RM) mais prevalentes em pacientes com diagnóstico clínico de polimialgia reumática (PMR). Materiais e Métodos: Dezesseis pacientes com PMR não tratada, classificados pelos critérios do American College of Rheumatology, foram submetidos a RM do ombro e/ou quadril, segundo suas queixas clínicas. Seis pacientes também foram submetidos a RM da coluna. Resultados: Foram avaliados 24 ombros, identificando-se bursite subacromial-subdeltoide em 21 (87,5%), sinovite glenoumeral em 17 (70,8%) e distensão líquida da bainha do tendão da cabeça longa do bíceps em 15 (62,5%). Peritendinite e edema capsular foram observados em 21 (87,5%) e 17 (70,8%) ombros, respectivamente. Dezessete quadris foram analisados, identificando-se sinovite em 12 (70,6%), bursite trocantérica em 11 (64,7%), peritendinite em 17 (100%) e edema capsular em 14 (82,4%). Os seis pacientes que realizaram RM da coluna apresentavam bursite interespinhosa. Conclusão: Bursite subacromial-subdeltoide, sinovite glenoumeral e do quadril são achados de imagem prevalentes em pacientes com PMR. Além disso, achados como peritendinite e edema capsular tiveram alta prevalência nesses pacientes. Estudos de casocontrole devem ser realizados para validar esses dados e estabelecer o real impacto desses achados no diagnóstico de PMR.

Magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients with polymyalgia rheumatica / Achados de ressonância magnética em pacientes com polimialgia reumática

Abstract Objective: To describe the prevalence of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in patients with the clinical diagnosis of polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR). Materials and Methods: Sixteen consecutive patients with untreated PMR, meeting the American College of Rheumatology criteria, underwent MRI examinations of the shoulder(s), hip(s), or both, depending on clinical complaints. Six patients also underwent MRI of the spine. Results: We evaluated 24 shoulders, among which we identified subacromial-subdeltoid bursitis in 21 (87.5%), glenohumeral joint effusion in 17 (70.8%), and fluid distention of the long head of the biceps tendon sheath in 15 (62.5%). Peritendinitis and capsular edema were observed in 21 (87.5%) and 17 (70.8%) shoulders, respectively. We also evaluated 17 hips, identifying hip joint effusion in 12 (70.6%), trochanteric bursitis in 11 (64.7%), peritendinitis in 17 (100%), and capsular edema in 14 (82.4%). All six of the patients who underwent MRI of the spine were found to have interspinous bursitis. Conclusion: Subacromial-subdeltoid bursitis, glenohumeral joint effusion, and hip joint effusion are common findings in patients with PMR. In addition, such patients appear to be highly susceptible to peritendinitis and capsular edema. There is a need for case-control studies to validate our data and to determine the real impact that these findings have on the diagnosis of PMR by MRI.

Resumo Objetivo: Descrever os achados de ressonância magnética (RM) mais prevalentes em pacientes com diagnóstico clínico de polimialgia reumática (PMR). Materiais e Métodos: Dezesseis pacientes com PMR não tratada, classificados pelos critérios do American College of Rheumatology, foram submetidos a RM do ombro e/ou quadril, segundo suas queixas clínicas. Seis pacientes também foram submetidos a RM da coluna. Resultados: Foram avaliados 24 ombros, identificando-se bursite subacromial-subdeltoide em 21 (87,5%), sinovite glenoumeral em 17 (70,8%) e distensão líquida da bainha do tendão da cabeça longa do bíceps em 15 (62,5%). Peritendinite e edema capsular foram observados em 21 (87,5%) e 17 (70,8%) ombros, respectivamente. Dezessete quadris foram analisados, identificando-se sinovite em 12 (70,6%), bursite trocantérica em 11 (64,7%), peritendinite em 17 (100%) e edema capsular em 14 (82,4%). Os seis pacientes que realizaram RM da coluna apresentavam bursite interespinhosa. Conclusão: Bursite subacromial-subdeltoide, sinovite glenoumeral e do quadril são achados de imagem prevalentes em pacientes com PMR. Além disso, achados como peritendinite e edema capsular tiveram alta prevalência nesses pacientes. Estudos de caso- controle devem ser realizados para validar esses dados e estabelecer o real impacto desses achados no diagnóstico de PMR.

Is the Bare Spot reliable for the bone loss measurement?

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the reliability of the Bare Spot (BS) as an anatomical landmark for the intra-operative definition of bone loss in anterior shoulder instability. METHODS: The distances from the BS to the anterior (BS-A), posterior (BS-P) and inferior margins of the glenoid cavity were determined both under arthroscopic visualization and by an open approach in 20 shoulders. RESULTS: The BS did not coincide with the centre of the glenoid cavity of the studied shoulders because the BS-P distance was greater than the BS-A distance (p < 0.05) and was located 40% closer to the anterior margin. The authors suggest a correction factor: BP-A × 1.25/BP-P = 1. CONCLUSIONS: The BS is located at a mean distance of 40% of the joint diameter, relative to the anterior margin of the glenoid. This point may be used as a landmark, using a correction factor of its mostly anterior positioning. Arthroscopy was reliable for bone measurements of the shoulder joint.