TAFRO Syndrome: Guidance for Managing Patients Presenting Thrombocytopenia, Anasarca, Fever, Reticulin Fibrosis, Renal Insufficiency, and Organomegaly.

TAFRO syndrome is an inflammatory disorder of unknown etiology characterized by thrombocytopenia, anasarca, fever, reticulin fibrosis, renal insufficiency, and organomegaly. Despite great advancements in research on the TAFRO syndrome in the last decade, its diagnosis and treatment are still challenging for most clinicians because of its rarity and severity. Since the initial proposal of the TAFRO syndrome as a distinct disease entity in 2010, two independent diagnostic criteria have been developed. Although these are different in the concept of whether TAFRO syndrome is a subtype of idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease or not, they are similar except for the magnitude of lymph node histopathology. Because there have been no specific biomarkers, numerous diseases must be ruled out before the diagnosis of TAFRO syndrome is made. The standard of care has not been fully established, but interleukin-6 blockade therapy with siltuximab or tocilizumab and anti-inflammatory therapy with high-dose corticosteroids are the most commonly applied for the treatment of TAFRO syndrome. The other immune suppressive agents or combination cytotoxic chemotherapies are considered for patients who do not respond to the initial treatment. Whereas glowing awareness of this disease improves the clinical outcomes of patients with TAFRO syndrome, further worldwide collaborations are warranted.

Idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease and connective tissue disorder successfully treated by siltuximab: a pediatric case report.

Background: Castleman disease (CD) is a rare lymphoproliferative disease. Idiopathic multicentric CD (iMCD), representing a distinct entity in CD, is partly attributed to autoimmune abnormalities and the hyperplastic process in iMCD involving the immune system. Consequently, iMCD presents a range of overlapping manifestations with connective tissue disorder (CTD), resulting in an inability to tell whether they coexist or imitate each other. Reports of CD combined with CTD are rare, more cases are needed to be summarized and analyzed to improve the efficiency of diagnosis and accelerate the development of novel treatments. Case Description: A male pediatric patient was diagnosed with CTD in October 2019 and had been receiving regular treatment with tocilizumab and glucocorticoid or methotrexate since April 2020. He was further diagnosed with iMCD of the hyaline vascular subtype according to biopsy-proven histopathological features and imaging-proven multiple involvement in August 2021. He received 4 doses of rituximab and then a combination of thalidomide and dexamethasone for about 1 year. His clinical symptoms were well controlled throughout the disease for a long period, but inflammatory markers were repeatedly elevated, which eventually turned normal after switching to siltuximab from July 2023, although a significant elevation of interleukin-6 occurred. Conclusions: We reported a pediatric case diagnosed as CTD and iMCD, whose inflammation finally be well controlled by siltuximab. Hopefully, our work will add insight into such rare situations and it is undoubtedly that the pathophysiological mechanism of CD and CTD coexistence and prediction models of treatment response remains to be explored to facilitate the clinical management and optimal treatment.

Real-practice management and treatment of idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease with siltuximab: a collection of clinical experiences.

Castleman disease (CD) is a group of lymphoproliferative disorders that share common histopathological features yet have widely different aetiologies, clinical features and grades of severity as well as treatments and outcomes. Siltuximab is currently the only therapy approved by the FDA and EMA for idiopathic multicentric CD and is recommended as first-line therapy in treatment guidelines. Despite the extensive characterization of siltuximab treatment in clinical trials, available evidence from real-world practice is still scant. This collection of clinical experiences focuses on patients treated with siltuximab therapy, particularly regarding the idiopathic multicentric CD diagnostic work-up, and on treatment administration in patients with complex disease entering differential diagnosis with CD or concomitant diseases. Thus, these data help further characterize and improve the use of siltuximab in real practice in terms of effectiveness and safety of long-term administration as well as consequences of treatment interruption.

Enfermedad de Castleman, fisiopatología, avances en el diagnóstico y tratamiento / Castleman's disease, pathophysiology, advances in diagnosis and treatment

La enfermedad de Castleman (EC) engloba a un conjunto heterogéneo de procesos linfoproliferativos que comparten rasgos histológicos bien definidos. Se considera una enfermedad rara o minoritaria u su incidencia no es del todo conocida, aunque se estima en menos de uno por cada 100.000 habitantes. Tiene una distribución bimodal (30-40 años y luego los 60-80 años). Su incidencia es similar en ambos sexos, aunque la variante unicéntrica parece tener ligero predominio en mujeres con proporción 2:1. La EC se clasifica en una forma hialinovascular (siendo esta la más frecuente) y otra plasmocelular, relacionadas con el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana (VIH) y el virus herpes humano tipo 8 (VHH-8), que junto a otros mecanismos autoinmunitarios desarrollan la hiperproducción de interleucina-6 (IL-6) por parte de los linfocitos B. Existen diferentes líneas de tratamiento, donde destaca el uso de anti IL-6, siendo el siltuximab el más utilizado y catalogado como el fármaco huérfano de esta patología.(AU)

Castleman's disease (CD) encompasses a heterogeneous set of reactive lymphoproliferative processes that share well-defined histologic features. CD is considered a rare or minority disease. The incidence of CD is not fully known, although it is estimated at less than 1 per 100,000 inhabitants. It has a bimodal distribution (30–40 years and then 60–80 years). The incidence is similar in both sexes, although the unicentric variant seems to have a slight predominance in women with a 2:1 ratio. CD is classified into a hyalinovascular form (this being the most frequent) and a plasmocellular form, related to the HIV and VHH-8 viruses, which together with other autoimmune mechanisms develop hyperproduction of interleukin-6 (IL-6) by B lymphocytes. There are different lines of treatment, where the use of anti IL-6 stands out, being siltuximab the most used as orphan drug in this pathology.(AU)

A Multicentric Castleman Disease Associated with Mixed Warm and Cold Antibody-Mediated AHA Responsive to Siltuximab.

Castleman disease is non-clonal lymphoproliferative disorders defined by hypertrophy of lymph nodes. The multicentric form (MCD), in which multiple lymph node stations are involved, is not associated with HHV8 infection, but considered idiopathic, although IL-6 appears to play a central role in its pathogenesis. Here, we report the case of a patient who presented with mixed autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) and adenopathy that was very challenging to diagnose due to very low values of hemoglobin and refractoriness of obtaining any improvement of AIHA with standard first and second lines of therapy (steroids, rituximab, immunoglobulin, erythropoietin, and cyclosporine). When we safely proceeded to lymph node biopsy, a diagnosis of MCD was established. This permitted the treatment with siltuximab, an anti-IL-6 monoclonal antibody. After only 1 week, hemoglobin raised and he was discharged. After 1 year, he was still in remission. This case underlines the challenges in diagnosis of MCD, and the first case of response to siltuximab after the failure of rituximab to relieve mixed AIHA.

Idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease: An update in diagnosis and treatment advances.

Idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease (iMCD) is a rare disease, and it is likely underdiagnosed because of the heterogeneity of clinical manifestations and laboratory findings. While the disease leads to significant morbidity and mortality, its causes are not yet fully elucidated. There have been significant advances in diagnosis and treatment of iMCD in the past decade, including the approval of the anti-IL-6 antibody siltuximab. In this review, we provide an update of the many new developments and publications surrounding iMCD.

[Castleman's disease, pathophysiology, advances in diagnosis and treatment]. / Enfermedad de Castleman, fisiopatología, avances en el diagnóstico y tratamiento.

Castleman's disease (CD) encompasses a heterogeneous set of reactive lymphoproliferative processes that share well-defined histologic features. CD is considered a rare or minority disease. The incidence of CD is not fully known, although it is estimated at less than 1 per 100,000 inhabitants. It has a bimodal distribution (30-40 years and then 60-80 years). The incidence is similar in both sexes, although the unicentric variant seems to have a slight predominance in women with a 2:1 ratio. CD is classified into a hyalinovascular form (this being the most frequent) and a plasmocellular form, related to the HIV and VHH-8 viruses, which together with other autoimmune mechanisms develop hyperproduction of interleukin-6 (IL-6) by B lymphocytes. There are different lines of treatment, where the use of anti IL-6 stands out, being siltuximab the most used as orphan drug in this pathology.

Lymphadenopathy in the rheumatology practice: a pragmatic approach.

Lymphadenopathy is a common clinical finding and diagnostic challenge within general medicine and rheumatology practice. It may represent a primary manifestation of an underlying immune-mediated disease or indicate an infectious or neoplastic complication requiring differing management. Evaluating lymphadenopathy is of particular relevance in rheumatology, given that lymph node enlargement is a common finding within the clinical spectrum of several well-known rheumatologic disorders including RA, SLE and SS. In addition, lymphadenopathy represents a hallmark manifestation of rare immunological diseases such as Castleman disease and IgG4-related disease that must be considered in the differential diagnosis because effective targeted treatments can now impact the prognosis of these conditions. In this review we present an overview of the clinical significance of lymphadenopathy in common and rare rheumatologic diseases and propose a practical approach to lymphadenopathy in the rheumatology practice. Differential diagnosis of Castleman disease and therapeutic options for this condition of increasing rheumatologic interest will be discussed in detail.

Long-Term Tolerance and Efficacy of Siltuximab (Anti-IL-6) in a Young Adult with Idiopathic Multicentric Castleman Disease During COVID-19.

Background: Castleman disease (CD) is a rare lymphoproliferative disorder with various subtypes, including the HHV-8-negative/idiopathic multicentric CD (iMCD). The diagnosis of iMCD remains challenging due to its non-specific presentation, in the form of generalised lymphadenopathies and inflammation. Two clinical presentations have been recently defined: a severe form iMCD-TAFRO and a milder form of iMCD not otherwise specified (iMCD-NOS). identification of interleukin-6 (IL-6) as a major culprit of inflammatory symptoms led to the development of anti-IL-6 therapies, with siltuximab being the approved first-line treatment. Case description: A 16-year-old male presented with recurrent fever, night sweats and several other non-specific symptoms. After extensive evaluations, an excisional lymph node biopsy confirmed the iMCD-NOS diagnosis. The patient received high-dose steroid therapy followed by siltuximab for four years. This treatment was well tolerated with only mild neutropenia not leading to dose adjustment. On siltuximab, the patient developed two mild COVID-19 episodes. His response to siltuximab remained effective throughout four years. Discussion: The absence of biomarker or causal agent identification poses a diagnostic challenge requiring lymph node histopathology for a definitive diagnosis of iMCD. Anti-IL 6 (siltuximab) is the recommended frontline therapy, suppressing inflammation and halting disease progression. Intravenous administration every 3 to 6 weeks can impact patient quality of life, prompting further research for alternative treatments. High-dose steroids, rituximab, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, lenalidomide or combined chemotherapy such as rituximab-bortezomib-dexamethasone are among the considered options according to disease severity. Conclusion: Overall, long-term siltuximab effectively controlled iMCD symptoms and was well tolerated by this young adult, who endured two mild COVID-19 episodes. LEARNING POINTS: Lymph node biopsy rather than bone marrow biopsy is needed for the diagnosis of iMCD.We were able to control the patient's condition in the absence of cumulative toxicity during four years of siltuximab anti-IL6 therapy.Immunosuppressive anti-IL6 therapy did not worsen two episodes of COVID-19.

A challenging diagnosis of idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease with complex systemic presentation: A case report.

Key Clinical Message: Idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease (iMCD) is challenging to diagnose due to clinical similarities with other conditions, such as Still's disease. Once diagnosed, iMCD may be effectively managed with the anti-interleukin-6 antibody siltuximab. Abstract: Here, we present the case of a 19-year-old Polish woman with persistent fever and enlarged lymph nodes and whose diagnosis remained inconclusive following initial clinical assessments and extensive laboratory analyses. The patient had subsequent complaints of joint pain and erythema which were suspicious of Still's disease and resolved with treatment with tocilizumab. Later, the progression of symptoms, such as lymphadenopathy, and elevated interleukin-6 levels were consistent with Castleman disease, leading to the diagnosis of idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease seven years after the patient first reported symptoms. Treatment with the anti-interleukin-6 antibody siltuximab resulted in complete symptom resolution and normalization of inflammatory parameters. No adverse events were reported due to treatment with siltuximab.

Are Patients with HHV-8 Associated Castleman Disease Successfully Treated with Rituximab at Risk of Subsequently Developing HHV-8 Negative (Idiopathic) Castleman Disease?

Introduction: Multicentric Castleman disease (MCD) is a lymphoproliferative disorder characterized by lymph node histopathology and systemic symptoms. To our knowledge, there are no descriptions in the literature of long-term outcomes of human herpesvirus-8 (HHV-8)-associated MCD. Case Description: We report a case of a 70-year-old male living with human immunodeficiency virus and a history of human herpesvirus-8 (HHV-8)-associated MCD. The patient reported having had low-grade fever for two weeks. Extensive workup revealed systemic lymphadenopathy without evidence of autoimmune disease or malignancy. Lymph node biopsy was consistent with HHV-8-negative idiopathic MCD (iMCD). The patient was subsequently scheduled for anti-interleukin-6 therapy. Discussion: The present case is the first report of probable development of iMCD after long-term follow-up for HHV-8-associated MCD. The case illustrates the possible long-term consequences of MCD, suggesting the necessity of further research on the pathogenesis of CD. Conclusion: Given the uncertainty in the long-term outcomes of HHV-8-associated MCD, periodic surveillance of patients with a history of HHV-8-associated MCD is warranted. Prospective nationwide cohort studies comparing characteristics of HHV-8-associated MCD and iMCD would bring further insights. LEARNING POINTS: This is the first case describing the probable development of HHV-8-negative idiopathic MCD after HHV-8-associated MCD.Little is known of long-term outcomes of HHV-8-associated MCD and idiopathic MCD, necessitating periodic surveillance.HHV-8-negative idiopathic MCD patients are treated with siltuximab, an interleukin-6 inhibitor, unlike patients with HHV-8-associated MCD, who benefit most from rituximab.

The role of interleukin 6 in the pathogenesis and therapy of Castleman disease - an immunologist's perspective.

Castleman disease (CD) is a heterogeneous group of diseases characterized by lymphadenopathy and systemic inflammatory manifestations. CD can be divided into uni- (UCD) and multicentric form (MCD) according to the disease extent. MCD is usually accompanied by the features of a systemic inflammatory response including fever, weight loss, hepatosplenomegaly, ascites, and edema. In these patients, we can also observe elevation of inflammatory parameters and anemia within the laboratory assessment. Based on etiological nature, the CD can be further divided into human herpesvirus-8-associated (HHV8-associated) and idiopathic form. Interleukin 6 (IL-6) plays a central role in the disease pathogenesis. Inhibition of IL-6 has been shown to be an effective treatment modality. Currently, siltuximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody targeting IL-6, is the only approved treatment for MCD. Its short-term and long-term efficacy and safety have been demonstrated in a few clinical studies.

Infections occurring following IL6 blockade for the management of cytokine release syndrome in onco-hematology patients.

BACKGROUND: Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) is a common adverse event of CAR T cell or bispecific antibody (bsAb) therapy. Anti-IL6/IL6R drugs are used in the management of auto-immune diseases. Some reports showed increased risk of bacterial infection in this context. In onco-hematology, there are few data about the occurrence of infection after administration of an anti-IL6/IL6R for CRS. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all consecutive patients treated in Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus between 2018 and 2021, who received anti-IL6/IL6R for CRS due to bsAb in phase I clinical trials or adoptive cellular therapy (ACT). We constituted a control group including all the patients treated in the same clinical trials or standard of care ACT, naïve of anti-IL6/IL6R. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients have been included. In the anti-IL6/IL6R group (n = 26), five patients developed a grade 2 to 5 infection within a month after anti-IL6/IL6R treatment, including two grade 5 infections. In the control group (n = 26), only one patient had a grade 3 infection. The two patients who had grade 5 infections were treated for diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), one with bsAb and the other with CAR T cell. Fifty percent (3/6) of DLBCL patients who received an anti-IL6/IL6R presented an infection, one of which was a grade 5. In solid tumor patients treated with bsAb and anti-IL6/IL6R, only one patient (/9, 11%) developed a grade 2 viral infection. CONCLUSION: It seems that the use of anti-IL6/IL6R in CRS secondary to bsAb administration in solid tumors patients does not significantly increase the risk of infection, as opposed to DLBCL patients where secondary infection might be a concern.

Siltuximab Monotherapy in Tafro Syndrome: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

TAFRO syndrome is characterized by the presence of thrombocytopenia, anasarca, fever, reticular myelofibrosis, organomegaly, and is frequently associated with kidney damage in the form of membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN) or thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA). Treatment is based on corticosteroids. A 59-year-old man who suffered from heart disease, pancytopenia and hepatosplenomegaly of unknown etiology developed nephrotic syndrome and progressive renal insufficiency, with a kidney biopsy suggestive of MPGN with a "full-house" immunofluorescence pattern. Positron emission tomography (PET) revealed multiple lymphadenopathies which histologically were compatible with multicentric Castleman's disease. The patient was diagnosed with TAFRO syndrome and treatment with siltuximab was started, with evident improvement at 3 months. TAFRO syndrome is a rare entity which may present with severe kidney involvement and histological findings of MPGN or TMA, with or without immune complex deposits. Our case suggests that a corticosteroid-free regimen with siltuximab could be an attractive therapeutic option.

Therapy of Castleman's disease with siltuximab - case report and review of literature.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease (iMCD) is characterized by constitutional symptoms, enlarged lymph nodes and laboratory test abnormalities, which are primarily related to the overproduction of interleukin-6 (IL-6). This form (iMCD) was treated earlier with cytostatics used for lymphoma, later with bio-logic therapy as rituximab, immunodulatory drugs and proteasome inhibitors, and in the last years with an anti-IL-6 antibody, siltuximab. Siltuximab is a human-mouse chimeric immunoglobulin G1k monoclonal antibody against human IL-6 approved in the European Union for the treatment of iMCD. In view of the limited treatment options for iMCD, this case report aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of siltuximab in the management of this condition. CASE: We describe a young woman with iMCD diagnosed at the age of 25 years. For first line treatment, rituximab and dexamethasone were used without any cytostatic because the patient wished to give birth to a healthy child in the future. However, the response after this first line therapy was short. In addition, after 3 years from the start of rituximab + dexamethasone therapy, it was necessary to administer treatment for the relapse of iMCD. We decided for siltuximab in this young woman, still aged < 30 years, and started administration of siltuximab in 3-week intervals. RESULTS: After administration of first two infusions of siltuximab, all inflammatory markers returned to normal value. Moreover, serum hemoglobin and albumin levels as well as C-reactive protein normalized after the first two administrations of siltuximab. The clinical response continue, siltuximab is still administered in 3-week intervals. PET/CT with fluorodeoxyglucose confirmed a very good anatomic and metabolic response to the treatment. Siltuximab demonstrated a favorable safety profile, and the prolonged treatment was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: This result is encouraging and demonstrates the potential of siltuximab as treatment of CD. As earlier published, this case confirms that significantly elevated inflammatory markers in a patient with CD predict a good response to siltuximab.

Recent Advances in Castleman Disease.

BACKGROUND: Castleman disease (CD) encompasses a spectrum of rare disorders with characteristic histopathological features. Unicentric CD (UCD) is a benign, local hyperplasia of lymphoid tissue that is usually curable. Multicentric CD (MCD) manifests as a potentially life-threatening systemic disease with complex symptomatology which is mostly due to an overproduction of interleukin-6 (IL-6) or dysregulation of IL-6-related signaling pathways. From a therapeutic perspective, it is important to distinguish idiopathic MCD (iMCD) from those cases that are associated with the human herpesvirus-8 (HHV-8 + MCD). SUMMARY: During recent years, it has become increasingly clear that even HHV-8-negative MCD is not a homogeneous entity and that there are clinically distinct variants. International consensus guidelines for diagnosis and treatment have been developed for iMCD and UCD. KEY MESSAGES: We herein summarize recent advances in diagnosis, treatment, and novel insights into the pathogenesis of this disease.

Idiopathic Multicentric Castleman Disease Occurring Shortly after mRNA SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine.

Idiopathic Multicentric Castleman Disease (iMCD) is a potentially life-threatening systemic disease whose complex symptomatology is due to cytokine dysregulation. We, herein, present a case of severe iMCD occurring in a previously healthy young man shortly after mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, responding to interleukin-6 blockade with siltuximab. Six months after the completion of siltuximab, the patient remained without any signs of iMCD or inflammation, indicating a temporal trigger of the disease. This case not only adds to the potential pathogenetic spectrum of MCD, but also extends the clinical picture of potential but rare adverse events following COVID-19 immunization.

Immune-related adverse events of biological immunotherapies used in COVID-19.

The use of biological immunotherapeutic drugs is one of the options currently being evaluated and employed to manage COVID-19, specifically monoclonal antibodies, which have shown benefit by regulating the excessive immune response seen in patients with severe infection, known as a cytokine storm. Tocilizumab has received particular importance for this clinical application, as has sarilumab. Both drugs share a substantial similarity in terms of pharmacodynamics, being inhibitors of the interleukin six receptor (IL-6Rα). Furthermore, sotrovimab, a neutralizing anti-SARS CoV-2 antibody, has gained the attention of the scientific community since it has recently been authorized under certain circumstances, positioning itself as a new therapeutic alternative in development. However, despite their clinical benefit, biological immunotherapies have the potential to generate life-threatening immune-related adverse events. Therefore it is essential to review their incidence, mechanism, and risk factors. This review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the safety of the biological immunotherapeutic drugs currently recommended for the treatment of COVID-19, provide a review of the known immune-mediated adverse events and explore the potential immune-related mechanisms of other adverse reactions.

Long-term treatment outcome of Castleman's disease: A real-world experience.

Background: Castleman disease (CD), classified as unicentric CD (UCD) or multicentric CD (MCD), is a rare non-neoplastic lymphoproliferative disorder of unknown origin. Owing to its rarity, the clinical characteristics, therapeutic modalities, treatment outcomes, and prognostic factors related to UCD or MCD are not well defined. Method: We retrospectively analyzed 88 patients with CD, including those with hyaline-vascular, plasma-cell, mixed type, hypervascular, and plasmablastic subtypes, for presenting symptoms, physical, laboratory, and radiologic findings, and treatment response in the Korean population. Results: The median patient age was 44 years (range: 18-84 years) with slight predominance of women (53.4%). UCD and MCD accounted for 38.6% (n=34) and 61.4% (n=54) of cases, respectively. Histopathologically, UCD patients were classified as 88.2% (n=30) hyaline-vascular and 11.8% (n=4) plasma cell types, whereas MCD patients were classified as 27.8% (n=15) hypervascular, 61.1% (n=33) plasma cell, 7.4% (n=4) mixed, and 3.7% (n=2) plasmablastic types. Twelve (13.6%) patients exhibited a poor performance status with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score of 2. The most common presenting symptom was sustained fever, followed by fatigue, anorexia, peripheral edema, and weight loss. Furthermore, splenomegaly, pleural effusion, and ascites were observed to be associated with CD. Surgical resection and siltuximab were the preferred treatment modalities for UCD and MCD, respectively, with favorable symptomatic, laboratory, and radiologic outcomes and safety profiles. The overall survival was 90.2%, with no significant difference between the UCD and MCD groups (p=0.073), but progression-free survival was significantly poorer in the MCD group (p=0.001). Age ≥60 years and splenomegaly significantly affected the overall and progression-free survival rates. Conclusion: Patients with UCD had favorable outcomes with surgical resection of a solitary mass, whereas in patients with MCD, old age and splenomegaly were identified as independent prognostic factors. Further well-designed prospective studies under advancing knowledge of the pathophysiology of MCD are warranted to establish suitable guidelines for the discontinuation or prolonging infusion intervals of siltuximab and treatment modalities for HHV-8 positive MCD patients or patients with siltuximab failure.

Optimisation of anti-interleukin-6 therapy: Precision medicine through mathematical modelling.

Background: Dysregulated interleukin (IL)-6 production can be characterised by the levels present, the kinetics of its rise and its inappropriate location. Rapid, excessive IL-6 production can exacerbate tissue damage in vital organs. In this situation, therapy with an anti-IL-6 or anti-IL-6 receptor (IL-6R) monoclonal antibody, if inappropriately dosed, may be insufficient to fully block IL-6 signalling and normalise the immune response. Methods: We analysed inhibition of C-reactive protein (CRP) - a biomarker for IL-6 activity - in patients with COVID-19 or idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease (iMCD) treated with tocilizumab (anti-IL-6R) or siltuximab (anti-IL-6), respectively. We used mathematical modelling to analyse how to optimise anti-IL-6 or anti-IL-6R blockade for the high levels of IL-6 observed in these diseases. Results: IL-6 signalling was insufficiently inhibited in patients with COVID-19 or iMCD treated with standard doses of anti-IL-6 therapy. Patients whose disease worsened throughout therapy had only partial inhibition of CRP production. Our model demonstrated that, in a scenario representative of iMCD with persistent high IL-6 production not controlled by a single dose of anti-IL-6 therapy, repeated administration more effectively inhibited IL-6 activity. In a situation with rapid, high, dysregulated IL-6 production, such as severe COVID-19 or a cytokine storm, repeated daily administration of an anti-IL-6/anti-IL-6R agent, or alternating daily doses of anti-IL-6 and anti-IL-6R therapies, could neutralise IL-6 activity. Conclusion: In clinical practice, IL-6 inhibition should be individualised based on pathophysiology to achieve full blockade of CRP production. Funding: EUSA Pharma funded medical writing assistance and provided access to the phase II clinical data of siltuximab for analysis.