Revisión histórico - narrativa del ALPPS / ALPPS: a historical review

RESUMEN Las resecciones hepáticas en dos tiempos se desarrollaron para aumentar la resecabilidad de los tumo res hepáticos en pacientes con futuro remanente hepático insuficiente. El ALPPS, descripto en 2011, ha representado un gran avance en el mundo de la cirugía hepatobiliopancreática. Esta técnica acelera la hipertrofia del futuro remanente hepático y reduce el intervalo de tiempo entre las dos cirugías en comparación con las técnicas clásicas. El ALPPS ha ganado popularidad rápidamente, con más de 1200 pacientes incluidos en el registro mundial. Los comités internacionales de expertos se han reunido en dos ocasiones con el fin de emitir recomendaciones, principalmente sobre las indicaciones, selección de pacientes y estandarización de la técnica quirúrgica. Aunque ha demostrado ser superior en términos de resecabilidad (entre el 80-100% frente al 60-90% de la hepatectomía en dos tiempos), su rápida implementación ha sido penalizada con alta morbi mortalidad en las series publicadas, que llega a alcanzar el 40% y el 9%, respectivamente. Además, la evidencia actual sobre los posibles beneficios y desventajas se basa mayoritariamente en estudios observacionales. Presentamos una revisión histórica, describiendo las diferentes modificaciones técnicas que se han lle vado a cabo desde su inicio y realizando una revisión rigurosa en términos de morbilidad, mortalidad y resultados oncológicos.

ABSTRACT Two-stage liver resections were described to increase the resectability of liver tumors in patients with insufficient future liver remnant. The ALPPS procedure, described in 2011, has represented a breakthrough in the field of hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery. This technique accelerates the hypertrophy of the future liver remnant and reduces the interval between the two surgeries compared with previous techniques. ALPPS has gained popularity rapidly, with more than 1200 patients included in the world registry. Recommendations about indications, patient selection and surgical standardization have been discussed twice in international expert meetings. Although ALPPS has proven to be superior in terms of resectability (80-100% versus 60-90% of two-stage hepatectomy), its rapid implementation has been punished with high morbidity and mortality reaching up to 40% and 9%, respectively, in the published series. The current evidence on the possible benefits and disadvantages is mainly based on observational studies. We present a historical review, describing the different technical modifications that have been carried out since its description, with a rigorous review in terms of morbidity, mortality, and oncological outcomes.

Totally Laparoscopic Mini-ALPPS Using a Novel Approach of Laparoscopic-Assisted Transmesenteric Portal Vein Embolization.

BACKGROUND: The initial mortality rates of associating liver partition and portal vein occlusion for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) were high. However, recent data from the International Registry show a continuous reduction of early mortality and major morbidity due to risk adjustment in patient selection and less invasive techniques in stage-1 surgery. During the first ALPPS International Consensus in 2015, we introduced a paradigm inversion of ALPPS, the so-called "Mini-ALPPS." METHODS: We combined a partial liver partition with a novel technique of laparoscopic-assisted percutaneous cannulation of the inferior mesenteric vein for intraoperative transmesenteric portal vein embolization. We report here for the first time, a case of a successful totally laparoscopic Mini-ALPPS, and describe in detail the technical aspects of this new approach. RESULTS: A 61-year-old man with a 6 cm hepatocellular carcinoma compromising the right glissonian pedicle in a fibrotic liver was treated by an extended right hepatectomy using the laparoscopic Mini-ALPPS approach. The patient had an uneventful first stage and was discharged 3 days after. A CT scan performed on postoperative day 8 showed sufficient future liver remnant volume after a 59% hypertrophy. An extended right hepatectomy was uneventfully completed and the patient was discharged 5 days after surgery. The histopathological analysis indicated advanced F4 liver fibrosis and negative tumor margins. CONCLUSIONS: This technical innovation allows avoiding a laparotomy to access the mesenteric venous territory and the risks of liver remnant injuries during percutaneous transhepatic approach. This new alternative may result of great utility not only in ALPPS but also for many different circumstances and scenarios.

[Associated Liver Partition and Portal vein ligation for Staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) in focal liver diseases management]. / Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein Ligation for Staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) v lechenii ochagovykh obrazovanii pecheni.

AIM: To determine ALPPS advisability in small future remnant liver. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 22 ALPPS procedures were performed at the Center for Surgery and Transplantology for the period from 2011 to 2016. Indications were both tumoral and non-tumoral unresectable liver diseases. Postoperative complications were classified according to Clavien-Dindo, ISGLS. RESULTS: According to CT-volumetry future remnant liver before the 1st stage of ALPPS was from 17 to 25%, before the 2nd stage - from 28 to 49%. Both stages were carried out in all patients with R0-resection in 100%. Postoperative complications were diagnosed in 40.9%, 1 death was caused by severe pulmonary embolism. Follow-up varied from 3 to 48 months (median 17.5), 86% of patients are alive at present. CONCLUSION: ALPPS provides rapid and effective FLR growth and can be used for both tumoral and non-tumoral unresectable liver diseases. However, ALPPS should be performed strictly according to indications and only in specialized centers with extensive experience of advanced liver resection and transplantation after previous comprehensive selection of patients.