Patient-specific modelling of stent overlap: Lumen gain, tissue damage and in-stent restenosis.

This paper investigates the effects of multiple stents, with and without overlap, on the outcome of stent deployment in a patient-specific coronary artery using the finite element method. Specifically, the objective of this study is to reveal the effect of stent overlap on lumen gain, tissue damage and in-stent restenosis in percutaneous coronary intervention. Based on intravital optical coherency tomography imaging, three-dimensional model of a specific patient's coronary artery was developed, with two constituent layers (media and adventitia) and plaque, using Mimics. Hyperelastic models with damage, verified against experimental results, were used to describe stress-stretch responses of arterial layers and plaque. Abaqus CAE was used to create the models for Resolute Integrity™ drug-eluting stents and tri-folded expansion balloons. The results showed that lumen gain was improved by the overlapping stents than a single stent after deployment; however, damage to the media layer was greater, promoting a higher rate of in-stent restenosis. Meanwhile, the lumen gain achieved with the non-overlapping stents was smaller than that with the overlapping ones, due to an increased recoiling effect. Also, non-overlapping stents induced more tissue damage and higher rate of in-stent restenosis than overlapping stents. With respect to long-term clinical outcomes, the study recommended the use of a single stent where possible or multiple stents with minimal overlaps to treat long or angulated lesions.

Very early tissue coverage after drug-eluting stent implantation: an optical coherence tomography study.

The aim of this study was to evaluate neointimal coverage in the very early phase after second-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation using optical coherence tomography (OCT). Patients who underwent staged percutaneous coronary intervention within 30 days after DES implantation were enrolled. OCT was performed to observe DES previously implanted. The median time interval from implantation to OCT examination was 21.5 days. A total of 10,625 struts of 54 stents (52 everolimus-eluting stents and 2 zotarolimus-eluting stents) in 42 lesions were analyzed. Strut tissue coverage was observed in 71.1 ± 19.2 % of the struts, malapposed struts in 2.56 ± 3.37 %, strut tissue coverage at the side branch orifice in 10.6 ± 17.2 %, and struts with protrusion in 0.95 ± 3.46 %. Mean tissue thickness on the covered struts was 39.8 ± 14.2 µm. The percentage of stent coverage was significantly lower in the overlapping segments than in the non-overlapping segments (48.4 ± 17.5 % vs. 74.4 ± 20.2 %, P < 0.05). Most of the stent struts were covered by tissue within 30 days after second-generation DES implantation. However, the percentage of strut coverage was lower in the overlapping segments than in the non-overlapping segments, suggesting that very early interruption of dual antiplatelet therapy might result in increased risk of stent thrombosis, even in second-generation DES.

Hemodynamics in coronary arteries with overlapping stents.

Coronary artery stenosis is commonly treated by stent placement via percutaneous intervention, at times requiring multiple stents that may overlap. Stent overlap is associated with increased risk of adverse clinical outcome. While changes in local blood flow are suspected to play a role therein, hemodynamics in arteries with overlapping stents remain poorly understood. In this study we analyzed six cases of partially overlapping stents, placed ex vivo in porcine left coronary arteries and compared them to five cases with two non-overlapping stents. The stented vessel geometries were obtained by micro-computed tomography of corrosion casts. Flow and shear stress distribution were calculated using computational fluid dynamics. We observed a significant increase in the relative area exposed to low wall shear stress (WSS<0.5 Pa) in the overlapping stent segments compared both to areas without overlap in the same samples, as well as to non-overlapping stents. We further observed that the configuration of the overlapping stent struts relative to each other influenced the size of the low WSS area: positioning of the struts in the same axial location led to larger areas of low WSS compared to alternating struts. Our results indicate that the overlap geometry is by itself sufficient to cause unfavorable flow conditions that may worsen clinical outcome. While stent overlap cannot always be avoided, improved deployment strategies or stent designs could reduce the low WSS burden.