RESUMO
AIMS: To evaluate comparative outcomes of straight (end-to-end) anastomosis versus colonic J-pouch anastomosis following anterior resection. METHODS: A systematic search of multiple electronic data sources was conducted, and all studies comparing straight (end-to-end) anastomosis versus J-pouch anastomosis were included. Anastomotic complications, post-operative complications, re-operation, mortality, and functional outcomes were the evaluated outcome parameters. Revman 5.3 was used for data analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-seven studies reporting a total number of 3293 patients who underwent straight anastomosis (n = 1581) or J-pouch (n = 1712) were included. Anastomotic leak and re-operation rates were significantly higher in the straight group compared to the J-pouch group [RD 0.03, P = 0.03] and [OR 1.87, P = 0.003], respectively. Stool frequency per 24 h at 6 months and 12 months was lower in the J-pouch group than the straight group [MD 2.13, P = 0.003] and [MD 1.44, P = 0.00001], respectively. In addition, the use of anti-diarrheal medication is lower at 12 months in the J-pouch group [MD 3.85, P = 0.03]. Moreover, the two groups showed comparable results regarding SSI, sepsis, paralytic ileus, anastomotic stricture formation, anastomotic bleeding, and mortality. CONCLUSION: J-pouch anastomosis showed lower risk for anastomotic leak and re-operation. Furthermore, better functional outcomes such as stool frequency were achieved using the colonic J-pouch reconstruction over the conventional straight end-to-end anastomosis.
Assuntos
Bolsas Cólicas , Proctocolectomia Restauradora , Neoplasias Retais , Canal Anal/cirurgia , Anastomose Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Anastomose Cirúrgica/métodos , Colo/cirurgia , Humanos , Proctocolectomia Restauradora/métodos , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
0.05).The comparison of operating time and hospital stay was not performed due to insufficient data.Conclusion:Relative small J-pouch and straight anastomos is provided similar early results after low anterior resection.Both of these methods were proved to be safe and effective.